Aetheraeon Notebook 18

I finally fixed the links. I didn't even notice the broken links before because I never read the notebook outside the editor and the editor looked fine but the HTML had issues with the formatting. Something got messed up ages ago but now it's fixed. I don't think I'll be going back and fixing them all, though maybe one day.

Today I just wanted to talk about some other points that are important to consider. More on the garden of Eden, gentiles, and how we're really at literal war with the other races. I did call this interpretation "race war" interpretation ages ago, probably for a reason. My old notes are so whacked though, the ones I took years ago, they're filled with contradictions because I was still figuring it out but I understood the basic premise.

It's still wind to me to think how far I've come with understanding correct doctrine and how much I've distilled down that heap of contradicting notes. I had so many unanswered questions before, which is probably why I abandoned this study because I didn't have enough connections made, despite spending more time back then than I have now. I spent a good 9 months straight doing bible study back then but I've only had like 3 months in this now and this is where I'm at. It's truly exponential in terms of understanding. Once you grasp the core points and have correct answers then it makes interpretation everything else much much easier.

Mat 10:5 These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not:
Mat 10:6 But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Mat 10:7 And as ye go, preach, saying, The kingdom of heaven is at hand.

Samarians are Japhethitic. That's why he said to not go there, or to the gentiles because in Gen 10:2-5 we hear about this and I never agreed with others when I heard them say it in identity circles before but now I get it.

Nations Descended from Noah
Gen 10:1 Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto them were sons born after the flood.
Gen 10:2 The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras.
Gen 10:3 And the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz, and Riphath, and Togarmah.
Gen 10:4 And the sons of Javan; Elishah, and Tarshish, Kittim, and Dodanim.
Gen 10:5 By these were the isles of the Gentiles divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations.

"By these were the isles of the Gentiles divided in their lands". These are the sons of Noah and their linage that aren't part of the covenant peoples, and thus are gentiles, or people of the same race but are in a different status with God. This is why Christ says that they shouldn't go to the gentiles, and yet they went to the gentiles, which sounds contradicting but as always without grasping these terms and how they're used to define different ethnic groups in the bible you'll never get it. The Samaritans were mostly made up of other Adamites that weren't under the covenant because they're not promised to be blessed from Abraham Isaac and Israel the man. It's something I assumed for a while in different manners but this clears it up 100%. He said to go to the lost sheep which are considered gentiles, but also said to not go to the gentiles and now we know the distinction between them. Other passages in scripture need this discerning eye to recognise fact from fiction.

Who are these people in the modern day? Slavic people of north eastern Europe, mostly. Places like Poland and Ukraine and Russia. Now interestingly enough Hitter actually looked down on slavics and the reason why is because they were outside the covenant and considered "strangers" in the bible. My assumption based on the notes I took ages ago was that they were from Israel, but that's not the case. They can't be, and Eli James is a lying fool who should be avoided at all costs as a false preacher. Euro folk radio is a joke. Either way Hitler knew who was who, which is why he said that Germans and the British Anglo Saxons were considered equal in his eyes. What was this measurement off? The bible. You'll hear over and over and over and over about Jewish propaganda saying Hitler made up some race theory out of thin air and NEVER recognise the bible as the source, say for the times when they recognise it to mislead people and say Hitler made up his doctrine about the Jews.

About the war with the enemy.

Exo 17:16 For he said, Because the LORD hath sworn that the LORD will have war with Amalek from generation to generation.

War with Amalek from generation to generation, implying forever. The Hebrew in Strong's says "From H1752; properly a revolution of time, that is, an age or generation; also a dwelling: - age, X evermore, generation, [n-]ever, posterity."

So that's why it seems that this war in a literal physical sense is still continuing.

Jesus Cleanses the Temple
Joh 2:13 And the Jews' passover was at hand, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem,
Joh 2:14 And found in the temple those that sold oxen and sheep and doves, and the changers of money sitting:
Joh 2:15 And when he had made a scourge of small cords, he drove them all out of the temple, and the sheep, and the oxen; and poured out the changers' money, and overthrew the tables;
Joh 2:16 And said unto them that sold doves, Take these things hence; make not my Father's house an house of merchandise.

Always keep this in mind. Christ literally whipped them out of the temple as the scriptures record. He literally enacted violence against them with physical damage, and yet most say Christ was a passivist. Hitler said Christ was a God of war who came to destroy his enemy. That's EXACTLY what correct doctrine promotes, and he was correct in his words. Nobody understood him because of Jewish filth that's poisoned the minds of the people.

The Song of Moses
Exo 15:1 Then sang Moses and the children of Israel this song unto the LORD, and spake, saying, I will sing unto the LORD, for he hath triumphed gloriously: the horse and his rider hath he thrown into the sea.
Exo 15:2 The LORD is my strength and song, and he is become my salvation: he is my God, and I will prepare him an habitation; my father's God, and I will exalt him.
Exo 15:3 The LORD is a man of war: the LORD is his name.

This is talking about Christ, the LORD is a man of war.

Sing to the Lord a New Song
Isa 42:10 Sing unto the LORD a new song, and his praise from the end of the earth, ye that go down to the sea, and all that is therein; the isles, and the inhabitants thereof.
Isa 42:11 Let the wilderness and the cities thereof lift up their voice, the villages that Kedar doth inhabit: let the inhabitants of the rock sing, let them shout from the top of the mountains.
Isa 42:12 Let them give glory unto the LORD, and declare his praise in the islands.
Isa 42:13 The LORD shall go forth as a mighty man, he shall stir up jealousy like a man of war: he shall cry, yea, roar; he shall prevail against his enemies.

God said he is at war with Amalek (who's seed in is modern Jewry to this day as Amalek mixed with Edom who they admit to being even in the scriptures saying they were not in bondage and were the seed of Abraham) who is his enemy. There's always songs in the bible praising God as "a man of war". Christ did say he came to bring the sword, which based on this doctrine we can understand as a literal sword and not the word of God as passivistic ideology, though the word of God is Christ as John proclaims and he destroys his enemy.

Psa 24:7 Lift up your heads, O ye gates; and be ye lift up, ye everlasting doors; and the King of glory shall come in.
Psa 24:8 Who is this King of glory? The LORD strong and mighty, the LORD mighty in battle.

David calling him mighty in battle. Battle against who? Everybody who's not Israel.

Not Peace, but a Sword
Mat 10:34 Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.

We must clean ourselves of sin regularly.

Rev 3:4 Thou hast a few names even in Sardis which have not defiled their garments; and they shall walk with me in white: for they are worthy.

Interesting passage. White garments. Skin or fabric? Strong's translates it as "light". Seems that we're talking about white skin representing light, because white is reflective of actual light and holy saints wear white clothes so the white and bright light symbolism is manifest throughout our metaphysical makeup.

"In ideological training, I forbid every attack on Christ as a person, since such attacks or insults that Christ was a Jew are unworthy of us and certainly historically not true." - Heinreich Himmler, Bundesarchiv Berlin-Zehlendorf, 28th June, 1938, Berlin.

"In this obeying unalterable laws are included the sacred belief of our ancestors, that everything on this earth was created by God and inspired by God. Only foolish, malicious and stupid people created this pagan fable, the horror stories, that our ancestors worshipped gods and trees. No, they were convinced in God's ancient knowledge and ancient terachings of His Divine Order of this world, wherein we were created in His image and where the plant and the animal world co-exist." - Heinrich Himmler. Die Schutzstaffel als antibolschewistische Kampforganisation.

Another quote I found. I still don't fully trust Himmler but what he spoke here is truth.

Joh 8:38 I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and ye do that which ye have seen with your father.

This right here is talking about the built in natural striving of blood truth I spoke about being a thing before I even went into the bible again. I already "felt" this was a factor, but since HD never described it I could never understand how it worked mechanically. I still don't to be honest, not entirely, but we know it's a thing. So many in HD get upset at this thought, out of utter ignorance of course. Foolish believers of Jewish fables. HD is an incomplete system as I've just demonstrated, either deliberately stifled or otherwise. Clearly the voice wasn't the voice of God but the voice that Christ spoke about here. Ra was a Jew. No surprise. The bible reveals all truths and that truth frees us from delusion. We can see clearly.

Many of the OT prophets prophesies are mirrored in the NT. If this is the case then why would it not also apply to our war with the beasts? There's only one bible, one God, one commandment (the complete works of all the commandments) and we're to follow such without compromise. War with the enemies of God is inevitable when you speak the truth.

5/4/25

I was reading through John again and the amount of passages that make complete sense now is insane. Like there's not a single verse that I can't make sense of anymore it's all coherent, When you ditch all the spiritual salvation stuff and understand that bad seed will intrinsically do bad deeds it connects the dots with his sayings. It's as I thought all that time before about how natural striving is built into you and the seeds are already there. Christ is telling us that our nature is based on our birth. The parables and even the story of the blind man that got healed and the Pharisees didn't believe he was healed talks about this same theme. It's everywhere.

I just saw the mention of "Christ consciousness" and connecting it to the Hindu idea of Samadhi which is basically a term for enlightenment in their terms. Now what I've come to understand is that the goal of all these other systems (all but the bible) is about the idea of enlightenment. This is a new thread I've just discovered that explains the Judaic ideology as it's made manifest in every other tradition on earth. They're not all the same because the bible stands above the rest as the ONLY text that is from God himself and has been proven over and over to have prophesy come to pass, and no other text ever put to paper has or will ever do that. I've questioned these people who follow these other texts and they'll throw at me prophesy that's apparently related but yet we see little to no correspondence to what the biblical scriptures say. They say their culture actually encourages race mixing, which is EXACTLY what proves my point. They don't value lineage because it's not pure to begin with. They're all born of unclean seed. Parable of the sower. They're all unclean. Remember what Paul said about how you can't clean what's unclean and to be separate from the unclean. That's who are Holy, and the rest of the world are bestial sinful seed who cannot see truth because it's not in them just as Christ says. They CANNOT hear the voice of God because they're not of God. Christ said they're born from below and he is from above, implying seedline and holiness. To be holy is to be sanctified, set apart, meaning CLEAN. PURE. That's the ENTIER doctrine of the bible and all its parts. Every other tradition is about mixing which is alchemy. They RELY on alchemical functions to transform themselves because they have no divinity or truth in them already, and those of us who do inner alchemy bastardise ourselves into being unclean. That's why I do NOT follow the higher levels of what the alchemist taught because he's teaching you to disconnect from God in your alchemical composition. We are made in his image perfect as we are, and the hermetic teachings say we are unclean and need clearing. THAT is the doctrine of Satan and is completely opposite of what the bible teaches and I will utterly destroy anyone who says otherwise. They're all wrong and I've fully explored that on every level (that's significant) from top to bottom. These people who preach universalism and spiritual cleansing are teaching the doctrine of unclean seed attempting to become clean in the eyes of their god who is nothing more than a product of the true God's creation. This is why they worship the principle of consciousness and yet cannot define it because it's outside of their capacity to experience. It's a self contradicting ideology from the beginning because it's not founded in truth. Christ is the truth and the life and the light of the world and nobody else. If you look around in the world today you'll see every part of this made manifest and see ZERO contradictions. ONLY the white race is pure in the eyes of God because he ONLY CREATED US! "You only have I known of all the families of the world". "My people". "I will be their God". He never says he will be a God to anybody else but us, because he didn't create them, they're not his people. Parable of the sower.

Mat 15:13 But he answered and said, Every plant, which my heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up.

Right there explains the entire bible and the world we live in today and why there's so much sin in the world.

The Judaic ideology is seen in the bible because they cannot see the truth of the word of God because they're not OF God. That is why NG preaches mind magic trash that doesn't work. It's all a load of trash and needs to be put out as such and burned up in the fire which is exactly what Christ is going to do when he returns. He will destroy ALL false doctrine and cleanse the world of imperfections. This isn't about spiritual cleansing (exclusively) but a literal cleansing of creation on ALL levels. This is why I said that truth is to be determined as correspondent on ALL levels and we do cannot pick and choose which levels we want just because it's comfortable. The truth is that truth has already won because God is truth and all lies and false doctrines and the teachers of those (white Israelites who teach this like NG will not be incinerated but punished with fire) will be utterly eradicated a the abominations they are. God feels wrath as they fill up their cups with sin and he is waiting for the day when their utter destruction will come about just as he said he would. He is at war with them and so are we.

1Th 2:14 For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews:
1Th 2:15 Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men:
1Th 2:16 Forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved, to fill up their sins alway: for the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost.

Num 21:2 And Israel vowed a vow unto the LORD, and said, If thou wilt indeed deliver this people into my hand, then I will utterly destroy their cities.
Deu 7:2 And when the LORD thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them:
Deu 12:2 Ye shall utterly destroy all the places, wherein the nations which ye shall possess served their gods, upon the high mountains, and upon the hills, and under every green tree:
Deu 20:17 But thou shalt utterly destroy them; namely, the Hittites, and the Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites; as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee:
Jdg 21:11 And this is the thing that ye shall do, Ye shall utterly destroy every male, and every woman that hath lain by man.
1Sa 15:3 Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.
1Sa 15:9 But Saul and the people spared Agag, and the best of the sheep, and of the oxen, and of the fatlings, and the lambs, and all that was good, and would not utterly destroy them: but every thing that was vile and refuse, that they destroyed utterly.
1Sa 15:18 And the LORD sent thee on a journey, and said, Go and utterly destroy the sinners the Amalekites, and fight against them until they be consumed.
Isa 11:15 And the LORD shall utterly destroy the tongue of the Egyptian sea; and with his mighty wind shall he shake his hand over the river, and shall smite it in the seven streams, and make men go over dryshod.
Jer 25:9 Behold, I will send and take all the families of the north, saith the LORD, and Nebuchadrezzar the king of Babylon, my servant, and will bring them against this land, and against the inhabitants thereof, and against all these nations round about, and will utterly destroy them, and make them an astonishment, and an hissing, and perpetual desolations.
Jer 50:21 Go up against the land of Merathaim, even against it, and against the inhabitants of Pekod: waste and utterly destroy after them, saith the LORD, and do according to all that I have commanded thee.
Amo 9:8 Behold, the eyes of the Lord GOD are upon the sinful kingdom, and I will destroy it from off the face of the earth; saving that I will not utterly destroy the house of Jacob, saith the LORD.

"Utterly destroy" is his words.

Lev 25:44 Both thy bondmen, and thy bondmaids, which thou shalt have, shall be of the heathen that are round about you; of them shall ye buy bondmen and bondmaids.
Lev 25:45 Moreover of the children of the strangers that do sojourn among you, of them shall ye buy, and of their families that are with you, which they begat in your land: and they shall be your possession.
Lev 25:46 And ye shall take them as an inheritance for your children after you, to inherit them for a possession; they shall be your bondmen for ever: but over your brethren the children of Israel, ye shall not rule one over another with rigour.

Also it makes me wonder about this. Since strangers and heathen are the Japhethites who are the Poles and Ukrainians and Russians and such (interestingly enough that's where the "war" is happening) that this allows us to buy them to use as our workers for our kingdom, and to have them be passed down through the generations as bondsmen. That would also explain why we're told to treat them well, because they're Adamites but not of Israel, There's no contradictions here. Taking a Japhetic (Slavic) Russian for example as a bondsman for your family is biblical and there's a clear doctrine which connects here. Strangers aren't always beasts or such because God despises them clearly. He created the pure lineage white Japhethites who are defined as "gentiles" which means that they're in original blood one of us but aren't known by God as his specifically, though the prophesy about the kingdom where the other mountains (nations) will come under us might also be explained by this because it's the same "nations" word which is translated as gentiles which the Mosaic law clearly makes distinctions. Christ said to keep his commandments, and they're recorded in our bible for a reason. The law shall never pass. So to me this means we're entitled to have these people as our bondsmen and bondswomen so long as we don't mix with them as they're not of Israel who the covenant was made with. Why would God tell us to accept beasts and Jews and such as "strangers" and treat them well when other times we're told to utterly destroy them? These people of Japheth are unmixed though not under the law which is why we can take them as bonds servants and inheritance so long as we don't mix with them as their seed wasn't promised or blessed which Abraham and Isaac and Israel the man's was. That's explaining what this means coherently. The "strangers" and "heathen" (remember Israel was called heathen too because they "went the way of the heathen") yet were still in the fold when Christ died which is what the epistles were for. So this doctrine has ZERO contradictions. If you view it as spiritual seed then this will obviously be a contradiction or if you don't understand who these strangers are then you'll think that God is allowing in blacks and Asians and other races like Jews into the fold but that's not the case because they're going to be absolutely destroyed and eternally tormented forever.

This is once again more proof of why the bible is NOT about a spiritual seed doctrine because the lines cannot be drawn for that. The lines are clearly drawn through lineage and that's made abundantly clear over and over and over and over and over non stop all throughout scripture as to who's who and who's Jew.

Laws Against Eating Blood
Lev 17:10 And whatsoever man there be of the house of Israel, or of the strangers that sojourn among you, that eateth any manner of blood; I will even set my face against that soul that eateth blood, and will cut him off from among his people.

Here's another example of "strangers" that are among us. They're creations of God which is why he's telling us not to destroy them. We've never been told to be in conflict with his creation. They're just not blessed as we are, but they're still his creation.

The Mountain of the Lord
Mic 4:1 But in the last days it shall come to pass, that the mountain of the house of the LORD shall be established in the top of the mountains, and it shall be exalted above the hills; and people shall flow unto it.
Mic 4:2 And many nations shall come, and say, Come, and let us go up to the mountain of the LORD, and to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for the law shall go forth of Zion, and the word of the LORD from Jerusalem.
Mic 4:3 And he shall judge among many people, and rebuke strong nations afar off; and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up a sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.
Mic 4:4 But they shall sit every man under his vine and under his fig tree; and none shall make them afraid: for the mouth of the LORD of hosts hath spoken it.
Mic 4:5 For all people will walk every one in the name of his god, and we will walk in the name of the LORD our God for ever and ever.

Found it. This is the chapter I'm talking about. Micah 4 I believe is relating possibly to end times prophesy about when the Japhethitic nations (mountains) will come to us and they will be with us. I don't know but it wouldn't surprise me. I've not heard commentary on this one before but maybe there's prophesy in Daniel or Rev to further explain this. The bible usually explains it self when you understand what each word means and under the different contexts for the same words that mean different things. It does say "in the end days it shall come to pass" so we're talking about end times prophesy here. Many nations (gentiles of genesis/Japheth) will come to the mountain of God and the house of the God of Jacob (Israel which is why I believe it's talking about our reign in the kingdom to come) "and he will teach us of his ways" "and the law shall go forth from Zion". Now if the plants that God didn't plant are rooted up and destroyed in fire then who's left? The other nations that aren't under the covenant. This prophesy to me explains that. As I said before that this could be the other races cannot work because they're all destroyed so if it's talking about end times and other nations being under the law then it must be other Adamic nations. This might've been the prophesy Visser was talking about which I had in my notes saying that "other Adamites" were brought in under the law when Christ died, and yet that's not actually true because this is the end times and only Israel are lost sheep because of the divorce. God never married the other Adamites as far as I know, and remember there's only 12 gates to the kingdom which are correspondent to the 12 tribes of Israel so this to me must represent the other Adamites in the end when Satan is loosed which would also explain WHY he's loosed to give the other Adamites their opportunity to be under the law and face judgement as we did in Israel, and thus all of the seed that God created that's pure will be in the kingdom because they're his creation. I don't know why God would want to destroy his own creation, the other Adamites, if they're pure. They're currently unclean which is why we're told not to marry them, even if they can live among us, but that we're to respect them. How else could you explain Micah 4? This can't be talking about Israel coming under the law because they're already under the law, unless it's talking about them coming BACK under the law when Christ dies and I'm reading into this too much, though it says end times so I don't see how that would be the death of Christ bringing them back to the law. This is why I believe it must be the Japhetic nations. Also "man" in the 4th verse isn't "ruddy' man but the Hebrew only has "every man" for it's definition as H376.

"eesh
Contracted for H582 (or perhaps rather from an unused root meaning to be extant); a man as an individual or a male person; often used as an adjunct to a more definite term (and in such cases frequently not expressed in translation.) : - also, another, any (man), a certain, + champion, consent, each, every (one), fellow, [foot-, husband-] man, (good-, great, mighty) man, he, high (degree), him (that is), husband, man [-kind], + none, one, people, person, + steward, what (man) soever, whoso (-ever), worthy. Compare H802."

That's the Strong's meaning.

Jesus Curses the Fig Tree
Mar 11:12 And on the morrow, when they were come from Bethany, he was hungry:
Mar 11:13 And seeing a fig tree afar off having leaves, he came, if haply he might find any thing thereon: and when he came to it, he found nothing but leaves; for the time of figs was not yet.
Mar 11:14 And Jesus answered and said unto it, No man eat fruit of thee hereafter for ever. And his disciples heard it.

Jesus Cleanses the Temple
Mar 11:15 And they come to Jerusalem: and Jesus went into the temple, and began to cast out them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves;
Mar 11:16 And would not suffer that any man should carry any vessel through the temple.
Mar 11:17 And he taught, saying unto them, Is it not written, My house shall be called of all nations the house of prayer? but ye have made it a den of thieves.
Mar 11:18 And the scribes and chief priests heard it, and sought how they might destroy him: for they feared him, because all the people was astonished at his doctrine.
Mar 11:19 And when even was come, he went out of the city.

The Lesson from the Withered Fig Tree
Mar 11:20 And in the morning, as they passed by, they saw the fig tree dried up from the roots.
Mar 11:21 And Peter calling to remembrance saith unto him, Master, behold, the fig tree which thou cursedst is withered away.
Mar 11:22 And Jesus answering saith unto them, Have faith in God.
Mar 11:23 For verily I say unto you, That whosoever shall say unto this mountain, Be thou removed, and be thou cast into the sea; and shall not doubt in his heart, but shall believe that those things which he saith shall come to pass; he shall have whatsoever he saith.
Mar 11:24 Therefore I say unto you, What things soever ye desire, when ye pray, believe that ye receive them, and ye shall have them.
Mar 11:25 And when ye stand praying, forgive, if ye have ought against any: that your Father also which is in heaven may forgive you your trespasses.
Mar 11:26 But if ye do not forgive, neither will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses.

Right here is a massive prophesy from Christ, and interestingly the order of this has Christ whipping the money changers (Jewish filth) out of the temple of God). The Fig tree represents Jews specially I believe. Not just tares, but I also believe goats are Jews too, considering they worship goats and the Baphomet is a goat, representing the Satanic seed. The fig tree that's cursed and withers is basically Christ talking about how the Jews will all die off and wither like the tree. He uses the withering of the fig tree to symbolise their eventual destruction and the desolation of their house as Obadiah prophesied. This is why Christ told us not to eat of the fruit of the fig tree forever, not that we shouldn't eat actual fig fruit but that the fig tree was symbolic of Jewish seedline and to not fornicate with fig trees. These different types of trees and their types of fruit are representing different races which God did or didn't create depending on the nature of the parable. The withered fig tree obviously symbolising the faith on a tree with no roots, so there's also spiritual lessons here it's not exclusively seedline but that's the core theme.

Christ does also teach here to us prayer in the sense of believing that we shall receive life. I don't believe that Christ is talking about receiving wordily objects but things that glorify God in this world. His people don't desire the things in this world when they recognise who they are, though if something is needed it will come.

Do Not Be Anxious
Mat 6:25 Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than meat, and the body than raiment?
Mat 6:26 Behold the fowls of the air: for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not much better than they?
Mat 6:27 Which of you by taking thought can add one cubit unto his stature?
Mat 6:28 And why take ye thought for raiment? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they toil not, neither do they spin:
Mat 6:29 And yet I say unto you, That even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these.
Mat 6:30 Wherefore, if God so clothe the grass of the field, which to day is, and to morrow is cast into the oven, shall he not much more clothe you, O ye of little faith?
Mat 6:31 Therefore take no thought, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed?
Mat 6:32 (For after all these things do the Gentiles seek:) for your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things.
Mat 6:33 But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.
Mat 6:34 Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof.

This is Christ saying that we can "manifest" the things we need, and he knows that, which is probably why if we "manifest" things that seem miraculous that it's because we've truly been blessed. The proof of this is that you can think opposite thoughts but since God knows the nature of all our circumstances we get exactly what we need.

Mat 6:32 (For after all these things do the Gentiles seek:) for your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things.

That's the interesting one to me. God knows we have need of these things, that the gentiles seek. He says seek the kingdom of God and these things shall come to us, AKA follow our inner truth as I've said and you'll receive what you need. That's EXACTLY what RS is based on, not this mind magic trash that NG promotes where your imagination "brings an image before the mind of god" and it externalises in the world. God already knows everything before it's happened because he architects the past present and future, and that's why the prophets prophesy come true as God set these things into motion and we're simply receptive to them. I believe that the Holy Spirit is the inner guidance mechanism within us that tells us what is and what isn't right or wrong and that's why Paul said that all flesh have the spirit. That's what this means, it's all built into us and we don't have to find anything outside of us that we need. It's all there and we just have to accept it and move with it.

Fasting
Mat 6:16 Moreover when ye fast, be not, as the hypocrites, of a sad countenance: for they disfigure their faces, that they may appear unto men to fast. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.
Mat 6:17 But thou, when thou fastest, anoint thine head, and wash thy face;
Mat 6:18 That thou appear not unto men to fast, but unto thy Father which is in secret: and thy Father, which seeth in secret, shall reward thee openly.

Just before this part of chapter 6 God also says that we are rewarded for fasting. We're doing this in faith of him and that we shall "live off" his word. That's spiritual meat. This I believe works both ways, fasting from the world and fasting in the sense of food, though Christ clearly says that fasting "not unto men" but to God is what he's talking about in this passage. We know fasting benefits but what exclusively is he talking about here. He says that fasting to the eyes of men makes your continence (skin tone) sad (dark) and that it disfigures the face, inherently enough. Christ fasted for 40 days. Fasting could relate to sabbath perhaps in this sense, of continual prayer to God under the context of fasting from the world. I KNOW fasting from food can benefit and clean out trash as we've outlined but I always saw that as using the inner alchemy which is why I explored it deeper to find correlation, which there is, but it seems it's not exclusively from food. The life comes through us from God. He gives and takes vitality. Fasting to me under this context would probably mean that you're not partaking in the world of degeneracy and are living a clean life following natural striving. It's also in the chapter relating to rewards and prayer and receiving things so it would make sense to be in context. I believe that fasting from the world is the secret here, fasting from the world of distraction and Satanic trash, not just food, though that can benefit too if we're honest, even though Christ says otherwise, so who am I to say otherwise if God says that fasting from food is for the hypocrites. Simply speaking Christ here is saying to disconnect from their world, which is what I've FELT for most of my life as necessary to value my vitality and natural striving.

This is the account from Luke.

Do Not Be Anxious
Luk 12:22 And he said unto his disciples, Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat; neither for the body, what ye shall put on.
Luk 12:23 The life is more than meat, and the body is more than raiment.
Luk 12:24 Consider the ravens: for they neither sow nor reap; which neither have storehouse nor barn; and God feedeth them: how much more are ye better than the fowls?
Luk 12:25 And which of you with taking thought can add to his stature one cubit?
Luk 12:26 If ye then be not able to do that thing which is least, why take ye thought for the rest?
Luk 12:27 Consider the lilies how they grow: they toil not, they spin not; and yet I say unto you, that Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these.
Luk 12:28 If then God so clothe the grass, which is to day in the field, and to morrow is cast into the oven; how much more will he clothe you, O ye of little faith?
Luk 12:29 And seek not ye what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink, neither be ye of doubtful mind.
Luk 12:30 For all these things do the nations of the world seek after: and your Father knoweth that ye have need of these things.
Luk 12:31 But rather seek ye the kingdom of God; and all these things shall be added unto you.
Luk 12:32 Fear not, little flock; for it is your Father's good pleasure to give you the kingdom.
Luk 12:33 Sell that ye have, and give alms; provide yourselves bags which wax not old, a treasure in the heavens that faileth not, where no thief approacheth, neither moth corrupteth.
Luk 12:34 For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.

Not Peace, but Division
Luk 12:49 I am come to send fire on the earth; and what will I, if it be already kindled?
Luk 12:50 But I have a baptism to be baptized with; and how am I straitened till it be accomplished!
Luk 12:51 Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division:
Luk 12:52 For from henceforth there shall be five in one house divided, three against two, and two against three.
Luk 12:53 The father shall be divided against the son, and the son against the father; the mother against the daughter, and the daughter against the mother; the mother in law against her daughter in law, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.

Look at this. Christ taught "not peace but division". War. Sword. Interesting isn't that. He never taught unity. Division. To be holy means to be divvied, sanctified. Own sanctification, don't own ego and lust to be fulfilled.

The Final Judgment
Mat 25:31 When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory:
Mat 25:32 And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats:
Mat 25:33 And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.

"As a shepherd divided his sheep from the goats". Sanctification starts with the seed, and then in the heart.

David's Census
2Sa 24:1 And again the anger of the LORD was kindled against Israel, and he moved David against them to say, Go, number Israel and Judah.
2Sa 24:2 For the king said to Joab the captain of the host, which was with him, Go now through all the tribes of Israel, from Dan even to Beersheba, and number ye the people, that I may know the number of the people.
2Sa 24:3 And Joab said unto the king, Now the LORD thy God add unto the people, how many soever they be, an hundredfold, and that the eyes of my lord the king may see it: but why doth my lord the king delight in this thing?
2Sa 24:4 Notwithstanding the king's word prevailed against Joab, and against the captains of the host. And Joab and the captains of the host went out from the presence of the king, to number the people of Israel.

David's Census Brings Pestilence
1Ch 21:1 And Satan stood up against Israel, and provoked David to number Israel.
1Ch 21:2 And David said to Joab and to the rulers of the people, Go, number Israel from Beersheba even to Dan; and bring the number of them to me, that I may know it.
1Ch 21:3 And Joab answered, The LORD make his people an hundred times so many more as they be: but, my lord the king, are they not all my lord's servants? why then doth my lord require this thing? why will he be a cause of trespass to Israel?
1Ch 21:4 Nevertheless the king's word prevailed against Joab. Wherefore Joab departed, and went throughout all Israel, and came to Jerusalem.

These accounts relate to the same event, though if you read carefully the beginning of Chronicles talks about Satan moving David, while Samuel talks about God moving David to take census. I believe that it was at this time that Israel was divorced from God which is why it says Satan moved them, because they were considered unclean to God for being adulterous. God was their "adversary" so to say at that point, though the prophesy was that his anger wouldn't last forever.

Jer 3:8 And I saw, when for all the causes whereby backsliding Israel committed adultery I had put her away, and given her a bill of divorce; yet her treacherous sister Judah feared not, but went and played the harlot also.

Judah got divorced as well after the 10 northern tribes. David was the King of Judea and so since none of Israel were considered God's people it would make me guess then that explains why Satan shows up here in that example to be influencing them because they've given themselves over to Satan in heart.

Jer 3:12 Go and proclaim these words toward the north, and say, Return, thou backsliding Israel, saith the LORD; and I will not cause mine anger to fall upon you: for I am merciful, saith the LORD, and I will not keep anger for ever.
Jer 3:13 Only acknowledge thine iniquity, that thou hast transgressed against the LORD thy God, and hast scattered thy ways to the strangers under every green tree, and ye have not obeyed my voice, saith the LORD.

God will not be angry forever, implying that Christ would come to redeem them. Scattered their ways to strangers of every green tree. Trees are people. Green trees representing something I don't understand yet. Most examples of "green tree" seem to be about real wooden green trees.

The Crucifixion
Luk 23:26 And as they led him away, they laid hold upon one Simon, a Cyrenian, coming out of the country, and on him they laid the cross, that he might bear it after Jesus.
Luk 23:27 And there followed him a great company of people, and of women, which also bewailed and lamented him.
Luk 23:28 But Jesus turning unto them said, Daughters of Jerusalem, weep not for me, but weep for yourselves, and for your children.
Luk 23:29 For, behold, the days are coming, in the which they shall say, Blessed are the barren, and the wombs that never bare, and the paps which never gave suck.
Luk 23:30 Then shall they begin to say to the mountains, Fall on us; and to the hills, Cover us.
Luk 23:31 For if they do these things in a green tree, what shall be done in the dry?

They do these things in a green tree. I believe that green tree in the dry could be symbolic for a state of blindness, as in a lost people who by seed are holy. I believe.

Luk 23:34 Then said Jesus, Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do. And they parted his raiment, and cast lots.

This one just after proves that to me. I can't be sure of it because there's few examples of this but it makes sense. A green tree is a people that are watered and nourished. Interestingly I'm surprised Christ considered Jerusalem at that time to be a green tree, unless I got it wrong. The dry part meaning the end consequences? There's more symbology to decode. So much. Dry trees are dead trees, withered trees like the fig tree. The Greek G3584 translates as "withered" or "dry" or "land". The Hebrew word H2717 means the same thing, except with more examples. It's transited as "waste", "dried", "desolate", "dry", "wasted", "decayeth", "destroyed", "destroyer", "drieth", "slain", "slay". Interesting that to "dry" someone is to "slay" them. So then we can think it would mean instead "what shall be done in desolation"?. Interesting that it's a question in that sense. What manner of sin shall they commit in their desolation and death, spiritual deadness, though Christ also talks about being barren and bombs that never bare (fruit/offspring) and he says to the mountains to fall on them, which I'd assume is symbolic for being consumed by sin. Context matches up. He's saying to the people with him that they should weep for their own ignorance as to their nature. He says these things they do on a green tree (I'd guess meaning a "healthy" tree) then what manner of sin would they fall into out of ignorance of their nature (they were divorced and lost sheep) in lands that are consumed by death and decay, just like the world we have today. He's literally referring to the world we live in today, as the same state as things were back then, forgetting who we are.

If we take this theme of forgetting about who we are then it would be another link to that doctrine here. Lost sheep. Remembrance. It's so common. It's so powerful. All these fools who take spiritual recollection from a relativistic solipsistic ideology of remembering your own personal God, which is filthy degenerate Jew trash that they spew out without a shred of understanding. The alchemist saying we all have a personal greater yang is correct on the mechanical level under the eyes of Judaic doctrine but from a biblical doctrine that doesn't work in any way at all. I almost can't believe what I'm saying right now I never thought I'd be here back then. The thoughts do not drive you, the inner truth does. The inner truth is the guidance mechanism, natural striving, the body reveals to you the truth, and if you accept how you're moved, for better or worse depending on the ideology you serve and the seed you're from then that determines the manifest outcome. I almost can't believe I've connected all these dots it's wild. I didn't do any of this it all came through me. I just sat here for hours and hours and hours every day studying without any way of stopping and this came out of me onto this page. I did not intend for this to be how RS would go, but it went this way anyway. It was all natural striving coming through me. All these FOOLS who preach NG TRASH will be destroyed and crushed under the truth of the word of God and RS. I WILL DESTROY THEM ALL! Not one can refuter this doctrine. NOT A SINGLE PERSON CAN PROVE THIS WRONG! I DARE YOU TO TRY!

Rescue the Weak and Needy
Psa 82:1 A Psalm of Asaph. God standeth in the congregation of the mighty; he judgeth among the gods.
Psa 82:2 How long will ye judge unjustly, and accept the persons of the wicked? Selah.
Psa 82:3 Defend the poor and fatherless: do justice to the afflicted and needy.
Psa 82:4 Deliver the poor and needy: rid them out of the hand of the wicked.
Psa 82:5 They know not, neither will they understand; they walk on in darkness: all the foundations of the earth are out of course.
Psa 82:6 I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High.
Psa 82:7 But ye shall die like men, and fall like one of the princes.
Psa 82:8 Arise, O God, judge the earth: for thou shalt inherit all nations.

Foolish NG thought that we are all gods means that we're imaginal and incorporeal at our core, but that's the breath of life, the angelic nature as having been created by God, sons of God. Notice how he uses lower case g in gods. These filthy Jews think that this passage makes them equal with God because that's how they see reality. That's why they're bad seed, they cannot see the truth because there's no truth in their father who they came from, just as Christ said. These utter ignorant fools. Their doctrine is FILLED with contradictions. If only I could present this on Jewtube, Boy NG and all his followers would be utterly ruined. I want to see nothing but their desolation for speaking such filth about the words of the true God. This doctrine will be destroyed either by me or someone else like me.

You Must Be Born Again
Joh 3:1 There was a man of the Pharisees, named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews:
Joh 3:2 The same came to Jesus by night, and said unto him, Rabbi, we know that thou art a teacher come from God: for no man can do these miracles that thou doest, except God be with him.
Joh 3:3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.
Joh 3:4 Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother's womb, and be born?
Joh 3:5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.
Joh 3:6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.

Unless the PHARISEES be born again (die and be born from above not this "spiritual" type rebirth from accepting Christ like so many believe and even I use to assume foolishly too) then you'll never see the kingdom because that would mean you're born again. He's condemning them to eternal pain not speaking about spiritual rebirth! Born of flesh. Born of fornication. The flesh birth is meaning these filthy Jews are born in the image of that which is created, instead of born as a son of God from above. Born of water (body) and spirit (the breath of life breathed into ONLY the white race) then they can't see heaven, AKA they'll be eternally tormented with unbelievably agonising levels of suffering the likes of which we cannot even begin to describe. Utter agony for all eternity. Imagine that.

Joh 3:7 Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.
Joh 3:8 The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit.

Joh 3:13 And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven.
Joh 3:14 And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up:
Joh 3:15 That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life.

Unless you're born from the correct genetic lineage then you're damned forever because God did not create you. You're a product of Satanic fornication and have no good in you. That is the message of Christ here, which is clearly consistent all through scripture and has ZERO contradictions. I'm trying to find them and I can't. For the first time when I accepted that everybody around me is in fact an ignorant fool and accepted the truth that these other races are inferior then I began to accept the TRUE word of God. I shed a tear and let go of this equality trash ENTIRELY! This was how I had this revealed to me, I was moved to see this in my studies on Hitler and their Christian roots, and looking at the lies propagated about him and what he believed and how only a fraction of a percentage of people even have an idea of what that implies or really means. When I accepted being "racist", just as God is then I came to see what is really there. THE TRUTH IS THAT ONLY THR WHITE RACE ARE THE CREATIONS OF GOD! The others are all bastards, born of fornicated filthy seed from Satan and this disgusting universalism trash that's propagated since the early Catholic church has made abundantly clear to me the deliberate agenda to hide the truth of the word of God that even I was deluded about for so long. God came to DESTROY everybody except that which he created, which was good. You are born of the flesh if you're not white, and that's what Christ is saying here, condemning them to destruction in the most unimaginably brutal manner imaginable just as they deserve in his perfect judgment. Praise Jesus who is the Christ!

Prophecy Against the Prince of Tyre
Eze 28:1 The word of the LORD came again unto me, saying,
Eze 28:2 Son of man, say unto the prince of Tyrus, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Because thine heart is lifted up, and thou hast said, I am a God, I sit in the seat of God, in the midst of the seas; yet thou art a man, and not God, though thou set thine heart as the heart of God:
Eze 28:3 Behold, thou art wiser than Daniel; there is no secret that they can hide from thee:
Eze 28:4 With thy wisdom and with thine understanding thou hast gotten thee riches, and hast gotten gold and silver into thy treasures:
Eze 28:5 By thy great wisdom and by thy traffick hast thou increased thy riches, and thine heart is lifted up because of thy riches:
Eze 28:6 Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; Because thou hast set thine heart as the heart of God;
Eze 28:7 Behold, therefore I will bring strangers upon thee, the terrible of the nations: and they shall draw their swords against the beauty of thy wisdom, and they shall defile thy brightness.
Eze 28:8 They shall bring thee down to the pit, and thou shalt die the deaths of them that are slain in the midst of the seas.
Eze 28:9 Wilt thou yet say before him that slayeth thee, I am God? but thou shalt be a man, and no God, in the hand of him that slayeth thee.
Eze 28:10 Thou shalt die the deaths of the uncircumcised by the hand of strangers: for I have spoken it, saith the Lord GOD.

Does this sound like a God who loves all? No chance. He makes a mockery and destroys enemies without mercy. How else do we manifest a world of order and abundance? The evil filth will never get lost under LOA, they love it because it keeps righteous spirits passive and lacking, that's why our TEST levels are being destroyed. I can tell you mine is sky high right now. That righteous aggression is killed in our people, chemically, artificially through cancer culture promoting passivity and tolerance and shutting your face in the sight of evil filth. You die in the spirit and lose a part of yourself when you fornicate spiritually with that sin in compromise. You don't want to be unclean before Christ when you are judged. Be clean. Cleans the evil trash and accept the truth.

The Sound Of The End - Keigo Hoashi

Dark Colossus Kaiju - Keigo Hoashi, Keiichi Okabe

Battle music.

Christ was confrontational and angry at hypocritical filth and he whipped and physically assaulted the Jews in the temple. He felt anger and righteously so. All these fools who tell us that feeling anger towards enemies and being blazingly passionate for the truth is meaning you're unbalanced are full of ignorance. These people are to be utterly refuted systematically and for truth to reign. Jesus Christ who walked the earth as the perfect example for us all rebuked them sharply! Why would I compromise when I know the difference and feel the spirit of truth moving me to TEAR their world views to ABSOLUTE SHREDS BEYOND ANY SEMPBLANCE OF RECOGNITION! ZERO compromise. THAT is how TRUE manifestati9on works. NOT THIS MIND MAGIC TRASH!!!

We are moved by the spirit that is dwelling in us, aware of our essence or not it moves us through the inner truth. Destroying evil filth is what Christ said he came to do, and that's what I intend to do too, without a single particle of compromise. I dare you to challenge me, I seemed to have been moved to be a ruthless warrior for this truth whether I chose this path or not. I accept where I am moved and hold nothing back because I know I have no other choice, and neither do you.

I have no words to describe how much I want to rip these fools to shreds.

Heirs with Christ
Rom 8:12 Therefore, brethren, we are debtors, not to the flesh, to live after the flesh.
Rom 8:13 For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die: but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live.
Rom 8:14 For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God.

We don't live through the flesh, for those who live after the flesh will die. Through the spirit do the deeds of the body you shall live. Those led by the spirit are sons of God. He's identifying fruit, seedline, spiritual inheritance. He called them brothers. Romans. The lost sheep. Christ said those who are of Satan do his works, are of the world and will die in their sins. We are eternal, we are immortal, we are promised ever lasting life. We are saved while everybody else around you who's not white will be destroyed! All these beasts and filthy Jews who rob us of an unimaginable amount of resource and vitality, they will be utterly destroyed. We are living in the world built by Satan and his children, quite literally. We are in a real war with them except we've already won the war.

Rom 8:15 For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father.
Rom 8:16 The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God:
Rom 8:17 And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together.

Glorified in the spirit of God that we share and no other does.

Keep in Step with the Spirit
Gal 5:16 This I say then, Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh.
Gal 5:17 For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the things that ye would.
Gal 5:18 But if ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law.
Gal 5:19 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness,
Gal 5:20 Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies,
Gal 5:21 Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.
Gal 5:22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith,
Gal 5:23 Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law.
Gal 5:24 And they that are Christ's have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts.
Gal 5:25 If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit.
Gal 5:26 Let us not be desirous of vain glory, provoking one another, envying one another.

The spirit is in the seed. Righteousness is built into you because you have the discernment of God to see that where the other seed walk blind and dead in the spirit who know nothing but sin. It's not built into them. They learn civilised living and so called righteousness but it's not in the sprit which naturally leads them. This is why God must utterly destroy them because they're vessels fit for destruction. Now I understand truly what living with high TEST is for, It's for destroying the enemies of God, and not to be driven to live more in the world as it would for the beasts. We are more powerful than them in every way and are moved by the spirit. When the spirit moves us then we are moved naturally. The spirit is our guidance mechanism that we feel in the body as inner truth and natural striving.

Without God moving me to see all these things I've seen since I woke up in 2015 which is a decade ago I'd never be here now with this truth. Never, It was by his grace in by choosing me to play this role despite all my deficiencies that I may a warrior for truth, the thing I battled with for so long. Moses was slow to speech at the tongue, he had a speech issue, and yet he was chosen. Why? Because that was the perfect person for God to work through who was receptive because of that weakness. Me and all my weaknesses and deficiencies that I had forced me to study deeper than others to find solutions though observing myself over that time and comparing that to what I'd learned. Doing this over and over and over is what led me to this understanding of the mechanics of reality on top of having the spirit to see right from wrong. I didn't decide that this would be my path consciously, though I FELT it intuitively, the FEELING I was moved through cannot be changed but only lived and breathed because the spirit moved me. How else would I have come to this understanding and find myself questioning the very foundation I stand on? It was all building up, and I'm sure the spirit has more in store for me in future with even greater revelations to come, whatever they may require of me to go through. All I know is that since I was a child I knew something was very wrong with this world but I didn't know what it was. I looked at myself in the mirror back in 2015 when I accidentally discovered gazing and said "there's got to be more to life than this" and ever since that point of acceptance I've been on this journey and now here I am living totally differently than anyone expected or even I expected. It had to come to pass because it was his will. I am clay in his hands being formed to his image with his spirit. I am living such an experience because of his grace and mercy on me, and anyone else who he chose to play roles of such nature. I honestly enjoy this role, as insanely challenging as it is, and all the boxes I have to go through almost on daily basis, facing the fire of uncertainty and coming out the other side with foundation that's stronger than before.

I found some interesting data. 1959 apparently only 4% of people in the US approved of white marrying non white. Culture has changed a LOT. Now take that back even further and you'll have explicit racism against anyone else. I've found many many books written in the 1800s and even earlier talking about beasts as blacks and other races as lower ordered than whites just like Hitler promoted under the context of covenant status. Jews being the bottom of the barrel always, even the original church fathers said that the Jews were a disgusting race. I quoted some of them earlier in the notebook. I'll read through these sometime but I'll list them here now anyway. It's good when you study "history of racism" and such because you find a paper trail of books to follow which all reference each other and the whole picture opens up. I bet some of these books are written under the context of Jewish eyes because I know they ran a lot of actual slave trade back then and one of them talks about cotton so it wouldn't surprise me. My bet is they'll misinterpret the "strangers" as beasts for some reason and place in there people who shouldn't be there. There's no way God wants beasts or unclean products of fornication anywhere near his altars of sacrifice.

You'll be able to find them on archive.org, or elsewhere. Keep in mind that many of them have the "google books" tag inserted into the front of the PDF so I'd avoid anything Jewgle has had its hands on and find one that's not been tagged by them. If you can't then just grab a copy anyway because it's better than nothing.

Bible defence of slavery - Josiah Priest

Negro a beast - Chas Carroll

A defence of southern slavery - Henry Clay and Alex'r Campbell

An essay on the origin habits &c of the African race - J Jacobus Flournoy

Cotton is king pro slavery arguments - E. N. Elliot

Slavery as recognised in the mosaic civil law - Stuart Robinson

Bible servitude re-examined - Reuben Hatch

Slavery sanctioned by the bible - John Jones

The American churches, the bulwarks of American slavery - "An American" (no joke that's the authors name)

Pro slavery argument - Chancellor Harper

I'm really not a fan of the "slavery" terms being thrown around because that's really not what it is if we're honest, we're not suppose to even keep them as slaves but to eradicate any source of sin off the earth. Using them as slaves defeats the purpose of why God commanded their destruction.

6/4/25

Exo 13:9 And it shall be for a sign unto thee upon thine hand, and for a memorial between thine eyes, that the LORD'S law may be in thy mouth: for with a strong hand hath the LORD brought thee out of Egypt.

Deu 6:8 And thou shalt bind them for a sign upon thine hand, and they shall be as frontlets between thine eyes.

Deu 11:18 Therefore shall ye lay up these my words in your heart and in your soul, and bind them for a sign upon your hand, that they may be as frontlets between your eyes.

1Sa 14:10 But if they say thus, Come up unto us; then we will go up: for the LORD hath delivered them into our hand: and this shall be a sign unto us.

Notice that. Signs and marks into/upon the hand.

I believe that the mark of the beast isn't necessarily a physical mark but more so a sign of fruit. If those who receive the mark worship him then those will be the the bad fruit, because their spirit wouldn't move them to take it, or so that's what doctrine says.

Rev 13:15 And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.
Rev 13:16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
Rev 13:17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

It's also the image, and an image is a likeness, a spiritual likeness, as we know from Gen 1 with the creation of man in his "image". Really its "our" image but same thing, his spirit, the creation of their essence under the sense of God's spiritual insight. To me I always thought that the mark of the beast couldn't be a physical mark because it would be too easy to prove the bible and people would point it out and not take it, so to me worshipping the image of the beast relates to those passages mentioned in Deuteronomy as a sign. It says between their eyes and also on their hand, and since Rev says it's on the right hand then to me that indicates the marking of the Israelites who are the sheep on the right hand of Christ.

Joh 3:17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
Joh 5:34 But I receive not testimony from man: but these things I say, that ye might be saved.
Rom 10:1 Brethren, my heart's desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved.
1Th 2:16 Forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved, to fill up their sins alway: for the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost.
2Th 2:10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.

"Might be saved"

This needs clarity. We must clear up any and all seeming contradictions with doctrine.

Here's Webster's dictionary meaning.

"MIGHT, n. pret. of may. Had power or liberty. He might go, or might have gone.
1. It sometimes denotes was possible, implying ignorance of the fact in the speaker. Orders might have been given for the purpose."

A possibility would denote a chance to not be saved. The Greek word "might be saved" ("might" on it's own isn't in these scriptures it's all 3 as one word) is "sode'-zo
From a primary word σῶς sōs̄ (contraction for the obsolete σάος saos, “safe”); to save, that is, deliver or protect (literally or figuratively): - heal, preserve, save (self), do well, be (make) whole."

Doesn't sound like possibility to me does it. Webster's meaning in English doesn't mean what this means. It literally means "TO" save, implying an action WILL be made. I am going TO do X. It's an event to come, "to save". Christ is saying here in John that "through him to be saved", as this is his mission. Literally Christ means "anointed", or "messiah" as in saviour. To be saved/might be saved referencing the Greek means one in the same thing, as Christ came TO SAVE. That's the magic of having the Greek words to check for more detailed meanings. I don't like needing to analyse Greek but this is more so for certainty. Make up your own mind if it means "to save" or with the might implying possibility that they won't, which changes doctrine. The Greek clearly means an action to be done, to save, though the English leaves room for possibility. If we take the Greek as the truth (which really it is what the word says) then we have no contradiction with doctrine that all of Israel is already saved, because Christ came TO SAVE, which is what those passages in John and are implied in the others mean, do they not?

The age of reason - Tom Paine

This guy wrote this book in 1794 which was during the French revolution when the Jews were beginning to gain power in France and over the church as we established. The church had to back off despite putting up resistance. No wonder he wrote this book criticising the church and the doctrine of the bible. I've been finding authors during the "enlightenment era" who started the shift in doctrine to universalism and atheism or whatever other theology, even metaphysical. By the way agnostic is "technical" atheism, as in what most atheists think they are but aren't because atheism doesn't deny the soul but denies the personification of the deity that created them. Agnostic is natural, not atheistic. Atheism is "no-god", where agnostic is "no spirit" as in the natural world only exists and nothing outside of the senses can be known. It's all stemming from around the time Napoleon gave the Jews power in France, which I don't find to be a coincidence. People had something to write about because of the shift in power and authority, thus making people question the status quo. He's pure white in lineage but of course got identified with the culture and it's shifts in power structure over time.

So I've been looking through more history and I found a common thread. Whenever economic wealth gets higher for the average person the ideas around liberalism become more mainstream and the denial of the correct doctrine of the bible plays out. Boom bust cycles artificially used by Jewish bankers to influence collective consciousness? The beginning of the age of enlightenment started by supposedly observing Asian cultures and other cultures which didn't hold to a "dogmatic" view of reality that "oppressed" peoples lives, AKA liberalism. The individual liberty above external authority, or in this case the authority of God. Sounds like the Weimar Republic days, except less degenerate and more gradual. There's sooooo much to dive into here.

It goes a little something like this. Reason enters the mix of philosophical ideas to explain human experience. Rationale and critical thought take centre stage and questioning any form of "absolutism" so to say would become a popular view on life to "liberate" the people from oppression. This is where especially women entered the academic sphere and took higher tier roles in politics. Francis bacon was one of the founders of this age of reason. In 1637 (not long after the KJV was printed) Descartes "I think therefore I am" was one of the first to write about the idea of the mind playing a role in the human experience in a meaningful way, which obviously opened the door to LOA and such that we have today which gradually evolved over time. Descartes basically said that from a critical thinking mind perspective we find ourselves believing things we really don't have rational basis for, AKA the natural view which is disconnected from the spirit. It was the beginning of the questioning of the spirit of God in academia. This very questioning of God is what Liberalism is founded on, people who don't fear God. From this point the individual identity became a part of conventional thought and placing importance on questioning anything which would challenge the supposed liberty that any free man should have. This is by definition a Judaic ideology, exalting yourself above the law of God and questioning yourself as to the rational basis for believing in such ideas. That's exactly what the Jewish thought is based on which is why I suspect Jewish influence here, because this doesn't just come out of the minds of children of God, unless it's coming from a place of accepting temptation through a shift in culture. Culture conflicts, ideology. That's why I spoke so much on that back when we studied Hitler more in notebook 12. Scepticism became the basic philosophy of the later 16000s.

One common thread I find here with all this is really about the open and free availability of information. Availability is a HUGE part because it established the "access" to a thematic current that can be experienced under a supporting ideology that appeases to the senses or the egoic mind of self identity) of information. Access to the printing press "democratised" the access of information where the collective could now attain access to information they could never get before. This is a part of the whole liberal ideology playing out and contributed to this shift in thought. The church was being criticised in the early 1600s around when Descartes and others were founding rational thought as necessary to know what is and isn't correct. I believe that the church was infiltrated by Jewish parasites and corruption became standard, This was also just around the time that the protestants gained influence. Technically the protestant reformation started in 1517 with Martin Luther questioning the authority of the church, but we can see the same principle here of questioning authority and attaining a will to individual liberty. This continued on as the church really became under pressure when the KJV was made available and people throughout Europe could begin to read their own bible. Availability. You see the common thread here? That's the trick. It's like these events in a series of succeeding events led to the shift in culture which then led to critical thinking when the church was no longer as prominent as it once was due to the printing press making English bibles available to everybody. I'm sure others even in the secular sphere have observed this but they view it as a good thing, while we here who grasp the real doctrine of the word of God and know who's benefitting from this culture know that it's not a good thing at all. If anything it's likely a necessity in the unfolding of the plan of God to reveal his word to us naturally just as we are experiencing today, The entire cycle of liberalism needed to go through its peak and dip to gradually lose influence over time, mostly due to economic factors.

I did say before that the enlightenment era started up more so probably because of the availability of resources, and since the Jews control the money supply they support or destroy culture through elevating or depressing (literally) peoples moods based on how available resources are. This was the time that people had more food than ever, and of course this was the time that since people weren't "struggling" to get by (due to artificial limitations imposed on them due to Jewish bankers playing God with money supplies) then it gave them time to read and think and study critical thought as a way of explaining the world, since those ideas were seeded in culture it was popular to follow such trends just like the technological revolution. It came and everybody just accepted it like it was normal because it was shiny and new and something to be explored. Naturally people would gravitate towards such an idea. I still believe that these ideas were in fact seeded through Jewish thought, though I have yet to prove that. It's the same ideology so why wouldn't they be involved. Anyway since the age of "discovery" was under way around this time in colonising the world in the 1700's it came that Europeans touched base with the other cultures and of course sucked ideas from their cultures. This is why God of course told us to be separate. If Satan never came down and spawned these people we'd never be in this mess. Europe basically was able to import novelties from other cultures, such as new foods, art, literature, clothing and such that became a sort of "cool" thing to have. "Look at me and my Asian painting" or whatever they'd do. Many were still racist back then as they should be because it's biblical but I'd take guess that the elites got a kick out of this and Jewish merchants likely sold these things. John Locke basically started the idea that people are born into the world with no intrinsic values and learn everything about their world from their environment and observations. He proposed in 1689 that everything we learn comes from our experience, which we know isn't the case because the seeds are within us already. Obviously they'd naturally unfold into something that from the outside appears to be like we're blank slates learning about the world but that's not biblical. I believe that this idea from him really opened the idea that the white race isn't divine or anyone is divine at all, and that we're all equal in our rights to live life to learn and experience what we're desiring. This sounds just like Satanism, dressed up in shiny clothes obviously. John here said that the senses are how we learn about the world, over the spirit. This idea propagated through culture and thus over time took the form as what we know today. It's absolutely disgusting to be honest. Ignorant trash.

Hume. Hume. I hear his name mentioned a lot even now. Hume says that there are no intrinsic valued built into us. Notice the distance between culture in those days (after Hume published "principles and morals" in 1751) and the opening up of these ideas. Remember that these ideas took off more back then because this was more readily available to access through the books printed in a less saturated market than now. These people likely had influence and ties to elites, though probably not all of them, but it wouldn't surprise me to be honest. It's just like how the Rockefellers dropped funding for homeopathic hospitals (which were standard in the 1800's) and thus they died out not because they didn't work but because the availability of resources was dulled out for them and thus they also died out too, and the same thing happened with the aetheric model of physics. I've seen this happen over and over. Germ theory was the same thing, Carnegie's with Rokefellers took over steel and education and institutionalised the biochemical medicine and normalised it in culture. I believe the same thing happened back then too, just with different names and methods, though I can't prove it. They won out by having more access to resources and not because it worked more, though often times their ideas appealed to the "problem solving" mind that people live with today.

We can see with all these events leading up to the time when Napoleon broke the authority of the church completely and Jewish rights were established that it was the true beginning of the end. We're so far from God it's insane.

I heard a story of someone who's about 70 years old now (I'm guessing here) about how when they went to Sunday bible school they were told that it was a win to marry black people. Remember the data that said in the 50's it was barely even considered at all that being with people of colour was acceptable? Makes sense. Back then they believed still even that blacks were sinful creatures. Where did they get that from? When I said that the narrative shifted from this understanding to the common universalism Judaeo Christian doctrine I meant very gradually. There were smaller institutions still teaching this but the bigger ones with funding obviously would've followed the new doctrine because that's how they're established, just like the rest of the sciences and such that I discussed before.

I remember looking into this briefly earlier today but I didn't write anything on it. I was looking up studies done on children and their trust of other races and research finds that a vast majority of children find anyone who's not white not to be trusted. Now of course they'd always cling to their parents the most and that's natural but we know the scriptures say that it's within us and it's even been studied about adults having racial bias within them too. The Jews seek to eradicate this from our culture, though they'll never fully eradicate it from within our spirits, for it was there even in the Egyptian and Assyrian and Babylonian captivity. We've always had forces trying to snuff out our spirit but it never happens. This is why all of Israel is saved. We are objectively superior from the eyes of God as it clearly makes that known in how he treats Israel and the other Adamites, We've been taught to disown that racial linage and the implication of that in our world over centuries and it's getting more and more and more intense with the white gaslighting. It's all made to destroy our connection to spirit. Our culture is funded by Jews who know we're children of God and if we recollected that (a common theme in the bible) then we'd wake up to our true nature and eradicate the Jewish filth off the face of the earth. It's coming when Christ shows up again with a sword in hand to utterly destroy them and throw them into agonising eternal torment. This is the facts of scripture,

Why would we compromise on that just because it means we'll face persecution? This is the world of Satan but Satan didn't make it, God made it, and God only made us which is why these Jews want us rubbed out of history as the people of God. They warp the word and make it multicultural and replace meanings of words and do all this trash to separate us from the truth. Even in the 50's they taught racial segregation still and now that's all but dead. This doctrine is correct and having the guts to preach it publicly is the act of the faithful, Faith is hope in things unseen. We can however see in the world the prophesy unfolding, and the fact that we FEEL that something is wrong with this world only illustrates to that point. The spirit calls us, God has called us as his elect to play a role in awakening our brethren to their true nature as Israelites and to fight and utterly destroy the enemy. Why would it be any other way? We are here to patiently await our Father to come and lay the smackdown on the Jewish filth, but that doesn't mean we must be passive. Christ never really commanded us to destroy our enemies as far as I know, and I've read the gospels through over and over and over and I've never heard of his commandments of such, though we can infer that through his acts and the acts of the Israelites of the OT that we'd be in every right to take the lives of the enemies of God if they're in our way for this earth is ours and nobody else's. God commanded us to take dominion over the earth and yet here we are bending the knee to filthy Jew government having to work our lives away to earn a fraction of a percentage that the billionaires take from our work. That's capitalism run by Satanic Jews. Capitalism also emerged around the time of the enlightenment too. Basically the enlightenment was the period of time that the Jewish filth established valid power structures in culture and eventually in government. They basically controlled the popular narratives and ideas that got seeded and thus unfolded with carefully orchestrated events. This happens today as well. CV-19 being one of them, an artificial event that never happened, at least under the context of there being some deadly virus that never exited spreading around. This is just one example in recent history, and with the injections it's probably ruined the blood of many people. I'd never touch that stuff knowing the difference. All they can do is corrupt just as Christ said, corrupt our blood and make us unclean. That's probably what the injections are doing, though I can't prove that. It wouldn't surprise me though, that Satan would want our souls to be sent into the fire with them because they knew they're doomed. As far as I know though it's birth that matters for salivation, and not the end state of the genes at death. If a white Israelite got GMO'd like mad and had their skin turn black or whatever would they still be an Israelite? Well Scripture says that if you're born from above then you're going to inherit the kingdom and everlasting life, else you'll be destroyed.

I'm searching for refutations of this interpretation. Always learn from your enemies. Little to nothing coherent yet that I've found refuting this doctrine in a systematic manner. Funny enough they're all presented by beasts trying to prove that the bible is multicultural and such. What a load of trash. They need to get lost and fear the return of God to destroy them.

Found nothing. All the same trash about curse of Ham, which obviously doesn't work. Yeah I mentioned that point ages ago because it was in my old notes from years ago but never took it seriously. You can't get white people giving birth to black people, and the curse isn't of skin. Still waiting to find even a single reference to a refutation of this doctrine about good and bad seed. So far not a single commentary has been made that I know of, though surely they're out there. I can't be the only one. I know some in CI talk about the parable of the sower and other such parables where bad fruit will be destroyed in fire but they've always just done that with Jews and not the other races.

For all the fools who say that I'm just following what an ancient book says, I'd say that you don't even need the doctrine of scripture to see these things in the world. Anyone with the spirit can see it. These people are the righteous sons of God.

One doctrine part I question still is how Ham for example or Esau could be cursed and hated despite being from technically pure white Families. How did this come about if every white man born is of good fruit? I don't understand that still, and I'd consider it the only hole in the doctrine. Though I've never understood it at all period, and It's always assumed one way or another to explain, I don't find anything in scripture yet to explain it though I'm sure it's there. My guess is that the remnant of the Satanic seed still exists within certain offspring of the white race up until Israel the man wrestles with God and becomes purified of this. That's my guess. Abraham wasn't purified fully because Esau cam from his son Isaac who was hated in the womb as Paul mentions.

Act 17:26 And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;

A lot of the refutations mention this verse, though we know that nations are other white nations and that the men are white men. The Greek here isn't the one for ruddy but that doesn't matter. The Hebrew has "Adam" translated with multiple words too. One of them is the ruddy H120 and the other Adam is H121 which just means "man". The H121 only shows up 9 times while the H120 shows up 561 times all through the OT and 393 times refers to the "ruddy" man which means we clearly know that the ruddy version of the translation of Adam matters far more since a vast majority of the word "man" actually is the same Hebrew to determine clearly who's white and who's not, though that's not always the case as white men are also referred to as other Hebrew words too. If you look at the distribution of the H120 it shows up a ton in the early and later books of the OT especially in Ezekiel surprisingly. Does this matter? I don't think so, though it could be referring to the other adamites than Israel perhaps, but I don't know. We know that the one blood is the blood of Christ meaning Adamites that are pure and especially Israelites so the doctrine still holds solid here anyway regardless of what the Hebrew term is used for. Strong's has minimal distinction between them anyway. Interestingly enough Adam in the Greek as G76 only shows up 9 times. Clearly that's not every instance of white man.

Interestingly enough Strong's also translates the Hebrew word goy/goyim as "a troop of animals or a flight of locusts". This is the same word used to translate into English as nations, heathen, gentiles, people. So clearly the context always matters when reading, because the same word can have totally different meanings. Interesting note here too. Only the book of Joshua has the word "people" translated for goy. We know that it's white Israelites because the verses and chapters they're mentioned in are clearly about Israelites.

Also another common thread I've found is the amount of verses relating to the serpent literally eating "dust" (of the earth usually). It's very commonly mentioned, and I want to grasp this part of doctrine more. We know Adam was formed of the dust of the earth which was red. The way I see this is that the serpent since being banished from heaven (there's a war in heaven with the angels and Satan was cast out as it says in Rev which is why he brought down 1/3 of angels to earth and they mixed with white women and beasts) then all he can eat is literally the creation of God instead of basking in his glory because of the decisions Satan made. Satan cut himself off from the light and so that's what God is saying, only dust shall he eat. Eating fruit might even relate here, only flesh shall he eat, corrupted creations. I don't know for sure but that's my current interpretation. I've contemplated that it could also be that they're literally "eating our dust" as in always following us to survive like parasites since they can't yield crop to survive on because of the curse.

The fools who say that there's a contradiction in the bible are utter illiterate fools. They say James 1:13 is contradicting Gen 22:1 where James says that God doesn't tempt anyone and yet he's saying that Abraham was tempted. God doesn't tempt his people under Israel is what James is saying I believe, because in Chronicles and Kings God was said to tempt David as well, which also in the other passage says that Satan tempted David, so obviously God became the adversary and "tempted" "his people" but they weren't under the covenant at that time because they were divorced which is my point as to why Abraham was tempted. This isn't contradicting the scripture or any doctrine. Only an illiterate fool would say this explains the bible and people without any understanding of real doctrine would fall for it. Then you've got the fools who think that justification by faith and works are contradicting when that's never the case if you grasp seed. Justification by faith is all over the bible and so is works, but they all stem from fruit/seed which is why we're the holy people. You have faith and hear the voice of Christ and come to him (faith through the feeling of inner truth from the Holy Spirit within you) unlike the bad seed, which Christ makes ABUNDANTLY clear and we've explored. Some fools will also argue that no man has seen God, which clearly Jesus Christ is God and God appeared as a man to Moses (as Christ) and they say there's contradictions in John 1:16 "No man hath seen God at any time" and John 4:12 ""No man hath seen God at any time" and 1Ti 6:16 "Who only hath immortality, dwelling in the light which no man can approach unto; whom no man hath seen, nor can see: to whom be honour and power everlasting. Amen.". Apparently talking about the essence of God as the beyond imaginal comprehension essence is talking about the physical manifestation of God as he's been made known to us throughout the bible, That's no contradiction John and Timothy are saying that no man has ever or will ever "see" the glory of God because he is infinite and beyond the senses. No surprise there what a load of trash that comes from these foolish atheists who think the bible is filled with contradictions.

Oh yeah then you've got the utter ignorance of the idea that there's a contradiction that "if you worship God you will not suffer" which is just unimaginably bad as an excuse to discredit holy scripture. They think that Mat 5:11 Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake. contradicts Pro 12:21 There shall no evil happen to the just: but the wicked shall be filled with mischief. and all these:

Psa 91:5 Thou shalt not be afraid for the terror by night; nor for the arrow that flieth by day;
Psa 91:6 Nor for the pestilence that walketh in darkness; nor for the destruction that wasteth at noonday.
Psa 91:7 A thousand shall fall at thy side, and ten thousand at thy right hand; but it shall not come nigh thee.
Psa 91:8 Only with thine eyes shalt thou behold and see the reward of the wicked.
Psa 91:9 Because thou hast made the LORD, which is my refuge, even the most High, thy habitation;
Psa 91:10 There shall no evil befall thee, neither shall any plague come nigh thy dwelling.

Apparently this also contradicts them. Joh 15:20 Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my saying, they will keep yours also.

Suffering as a Christian
1Pe 4:12 Beloved, think it not strange concerning the fiery trial which is to try you, as though some strange thing happened unto you:
1Pe 4:13 But rejoice, inasmuch as ye are partakers of Christ's sufferings; that, when his glory shall be revealed, ye may be glad also with exceeding joy.

They also point to this chapter literally titled "suffering as a Christian" to justify it. So suffering as a Christian is facing persecution from the government of the world today, and Christ said blessed be those who suffer for his name, as in those who can see the truth and speak against it for they are moved by the spirit. While it can suck to face persecution I don't find suffering in it from the context of "suffering" as in being under burden or whatever because following the spirit is satisfying, despite the persecution. We're never guaranteed to be delivered out of suffering at all, the proverbs and psalms are talking about suffering as in eternal suffering and such, the weight of being born a bastard and having no light to bask in regardless of circumstances. This solves the seeming contradiction, because it's through the spirit that we are moved towards where we must move, even if suffering temporarily in the physical sense occurs because the outcome for us as the sanctified (holy and separate) will always have no evil done to us, for we are children of God. Once again you've got utter ignorance being thrown around. I can rest easy every night in prayer knowing that my salvation is done, it's nailed to the cross with the blood of Christ. We face temporary persecution which naturally comes out of us because of our spirit but at the same time because we are spirit nothing bad can happen to us in the sense of our eternal destiny which is why we shall not suffer. Under their logic Christ who is God come to save us in the flesh to re-establish the covenant with Israel also cannot suffer either and yet he suffered. Some people have like 30 or more "obvious contradictions" but I'm not even going to bother going into them all and wasting time on this most people who understand real doctrine can understand there's no contradictions.

This is from the transcript of a lecture I found in Jewtube. I don't know which one it is as in its "name" but I'll just paste the transcript from YT. Heads up the formatting my be strange so the text may be tiny when I save it but I don't know.

"If I use the word god or the word christ the word jesus the word lord and in any way it conveys the sense of an existence someone or something outside of yourself you have the wrong concept of god or christ we are told do you not realize that jesus christ is in you do you not realize that you are the temple of the living god and the spirit of god dwells in you so if the word conveys this something outside of yourself you've got the wrong god"

Luk 17:21 Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.

2Co 6:16 And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.

These are the verses he's referring to.

These don't prove anything that God is within you. God is thin you because you're made in his image and have his blood, he's within you because that's the spirit which only the white race can contain. Duhhhh.

I also find it funny that NG quotes "Ferrar Fenton" bible who was in league with masons by the way from what I've heard of him. That bible is quoted by NG because it's based on Jewish ideology. No surprise. He's a joke. I can't believe his message still breathes. I want to slay it mercilessly and burn it in the most blazing fire imaginable.

7/4/25

Going through more of what NG says about the bible. He says that Gal 3:8 proves that things are already pre-determined. We know this from Gen 3:15, the enmity (NG still can't explain this) and the prophesy of Christ coming to crush the serpent.

Gal 3:8 And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed.

Ng also claims that Galatians was the first book written, or had pen put to paper in the NT. Job was apparently the first book written in the OT, but that also doesn't prove anything based on what we know about the nature of how prophesy unfolds in a strange manner of order and how in Rev 17:8 there are the names that "were not written in the lamb's book of life from the foundation from the world" under the context of them who will be cast into the pit and never escape. Before the foundation of the world is the pre-determined election according to the will of God. Apparently NG says that since the book of Galatians was written before the gospels that it must've been based on something other than real history otherwise Paul wouldn't have experienced these things that he writes about beforehand. What NG seems to not grasp is that these things were written through the Holy Spirit and were inspired based on oral tradition back then as few actually wrote books themselves. Of course the books are going to be written in strange orders chronologically. The fact that these books were written around the time of the letter of Pilate and Josephus's writings and such also demonstrates further sources to support this idea.

Either way NG says that since Paul says that apparently the gospel was preached to Abraham. Are we talking about the actual written gospels of the bible with Christ on earth and his story or are we talking about the gospel in relation to the "story" of redemption in principle, because in the OT and Gen 25 when Abraham dies there's zero indication that God revealed any gospel to him, if we're talking about the gospel of Christ in details we have recorded. He did preach the "gospel" to Abraham relating to the promises, which is literally what Paul says "In thee shall all nations be blessed" which we know relates to the Israelites and if you want to stretch it their redemption which was actually eluded to in Gen 3:15 and earlier in passages in Moses I believe you'll find scripture relating to the coming of Christ and their redemption ahead of time. Gen 3:15 proves that. So what basis does NG have to say that the gospels as we have in the books of Mark Matthew Luke and John were preached to Abraham? He's making it up! He literally made that up there's ZERO reference to that anywhere and Paul QUOTES the promise made to Abraham so once again NG is literally making things up. he also says that gentile means "non Hebrew" which is NOT the case. He didn't say Jew probably because he wasn't into the racial idea but that Hebrew would be a class of people on the earth, the chosen ones, though he never explains this.

Joh 8:56 Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw it, and was glad.

This is the passage he has to prove that Abraham received the gospel.

Joh 8:57 Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham?
Joh 8:58 Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.

Before Abraham was I am. There's NG and his "I AM" idea again. The Angels in heaven also rejoiced at the creation of the earth and there are names written in the book of life before the foundation of the world and the prophesy was to play out which means that what was to come was already planned and Christ could likely be referring to it under that context considering Christ literally says that he was before Abraham was, implying he planned this all along as was prophesied so NG is still making stuff up. I don't think you could stretch this and say that Abraham's seed saw it implying him and his fruit carrying forth to see the unfolding, that's a bit far and isn't implied.

Job 38:3 Gird up now thy loins like a man; for I will demand of thee, and answer thou me.
Job 38:4 Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding.
Job 38:5 Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who hath stretched the line upon it?
Job 38:6 Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner stone thereof;
Job 38:7 When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?

This is God talking to Job here, to gird up his loins like a man and answer. He's asking Job where he was when the word of God created the world, when the sons of God sang when the earth was created.

Anyway what NG says next is ""he saw the fulfilment of a play which was that the sons of God would actually BECOME God that all would be raised to the level of God the father but that they could only be raised to that level by passing through the horrors of this world" Then he says that you can't see the horrors unless you become "buried in a garment of flesh and blood". Whoa. Did I just hear NG say that. "So the sons of God fell in love with the daughters of men and came down and penetrated and annexed the brains of these garments of flesh". That's a serious error. We know that these are the angels that didn't keep their estates as Jude talks about who fornicated with men. Rev also says that Satan cast down 1/3 of the angels from heaven with his tail. This has nothing to do with our ethereal spirits coming into bodies. If that's the case then what's gen 1-2 about? NG says that when we came into the world and "annexed the brains" of the bodies that were created that they became animated. Well That doesn't work, because Adam was breathed into him the breath of life before God said he repented of his creation of man. Why would that work.

Increasing Corruption on Earth
Gen 6:1 And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,
Gen 6:2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.
Gen 6:3 And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.
Gen 6:4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
Gen 6:5 And GOD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
Gen 6:6 And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.
Gen 6:7 And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them.

Men began to multiply, because Adam and the angels which fornicated (as Jude explains among with other passages I've listed here which elude to that) with the daughters of men and beasts and such. I've assumed that the falling of the angels happened before Adam had the breath of life breathed into him, though that's not demonstrated in scripture. There's no timeline as far as I know of that can prove this. Either way if the angels according to the order of Genesis as it plays out came down then that means there were already animated men on earth such as with Adam and Eve and the serpent. How does NG explain the enmity between the seeds and the prophesy of Gen3:15? How does NG explain the literal specific laws of the Mosaic law in Lev and Deut. Why would God repent that he created man and have it grieve his heart about the seeds he didn't plant on earth relating to the giants and such that he flooded? Sounds like NG is picking parts of scripture to make a story like most do.

"To be every one of them states of the sleep into which the soul may fall when it leaves paradise following the serpent, the symbol of wisdom and knowledge". He's saying that the serpent represents the knowledge of Good and evil, which the tree in the garden can elude do which we were told not to eat from (mix with which actually under the NG context would support what Jude says about the angels that fornicated and kept not their estate but in a stretch because the context of them was spoken of as evil vessels fit for destruction and not to gain knowledge and experience like what NG says here) and that we "followed" the serpent (I'm assuming into the body representing kundalini so called serpent and such) into the body which bound us into the form and that the goal is to transcend the body, just like every other Judaic system that comes from traditions of non white men.

"Having gone though all we come to the climax and the climax is resurrection, and may I tell you it's an actual literal fact. I have experienced it. I have reached the end of the drama. It came to me in 1959. I am now approaching my 12th birthday after my birth from above ((WHAT A JOKE NG IS IGNORANT OF WHAT THAT MEANS)) and we are told we will not return to the kingdom of God, raise to the level of God the father until we are born from above((become as one with God as all the Jewish ideology believes)), and birth from above and resurrection coincide. Man awakens within his skull and he comes out of that skull to find the infant wrapped in swaddling clothiers ((Christ child I'd assume he means)) and the 3 witnesses present to the event. He is unseen by the witnesses because he is spirit, he is God, he is God being born, born this time not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man but of God, so God is giving birth to himself, raising himself to higher levels of his own being. So all the sons come down into this world and they go back after they've completed the journey and they go back after they've completed the journey and they can't get back until they're born from above as is told in the 3rd chapter of John".

Oh man I found so many holes in this its's insane. He's quoting this to prove that apparently spiritual rebirth is a thing, which we KNOW is not the case given all of doctrine that's established as actual seedline lineage and the Jews Christ speaks to in John 8 PROVES that because they add the details that they weren't in captivity to man meaning they're from Edom and avoided the Assyrian and Babylonian captivity. WHAT A JOKE!

Joh 3:3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.

Apparently this proves his narrative. He's buying into the Jewish ideology hook line and sinker that God is imperfect and has to experience corporeal being to expand. His glory is not infinite as he is learning, expanding, growing. That's basically what NG is saying which is never eluded to anywhere in scripture that's a total fantasy.

He's saying this proves it when we know this relates to being created white and that everybody else will be destroyed! He's saying that since God was in heaven and his sons descended from heaven (the angels that fornicated apparently is who NG is talking about which is also a joke) that only those who descended who were once in heaven (white seed made in his image, though technically Adam and Eve weren't IN heaven as far as I know) can see heaven. He says that also since Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness during exodus that so shall the son of man be lifted up, under his context relating to the rebirth. So NG promotes spiritual rebirth narrative, which we've established doesn't work. The terms for gentiles doesn't work either. Who are the "Hebrews" in what NG says? Maybe he'll get there. I've yet to do a full on breakdown of his explanation of scripture in a systematic manner like this using all his examples to outline his doctrine. Perhaps I should fully explore this so we can all see it from both sides and see which holds up. So far NG is saying that we fornicated with flesh. Under his doctrine that works because you could see the overlap of spirit and flesh as "fornication" technically also but again Jude is speaking about them under a negative context that these angels are remaining in everlasting darkness and chains at the end, not resurrection, so who's he talking about? We're of course assuming here that Jude is talking about the fallen angels of Gen chapter 6 which also supports Rev 12:4.

Rev 12:4 And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born.

Jud 1:6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.
Jud 1:7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.

Sounds to me that NG has a hole in his doctrine that makes perfect sense under what I've established, unless I'm missing something. Christ did say he came to bring the sword and to divide the nations and all that, not to bring peace and love to all, because NG is saying that every race has spirit in it from God but that's not true.

Neville quotes William Blake when he said that "All men in eternity are rivers, mountains, cities, villages" according to bible language. Where's the trees? We KNOW people are trees and seed and fruit and branches and vines. I'd guess that he's saying those are imaginal seeds, tending to the imaginal vineyard.

Honestly I might as well just post his whole lecture in another page linked here so that you can reference his model. He never outlines fully the biblical language anywhere in a single book or lecture in a systematic manner so I don't have that to reference and when people ask nobody has a direct answer to where you can look to, as far as I know. I've been in live chats with big name coaches undercover and they usually just pass off questions about scripture that wasn't explained as "that's for kabbalah". What a joke, He has a single book that's barely what I'd consider an explanation called "interpretation of scripture" but it's really not a systematic exploration and more so picking bits out of the bible to make the narrative seem coherent. He's never explained anything about how the physical world has manifest the history as it is and that I've explored and found revealing insights through pointing to the fact that there is in fact a totally opposite end doctrine that refutes his which has been lost. We're heading towards a time where what NG says is approved more than ever, and that's also proving my point, the doctrine of universalism is becoming conventionally accepted though still questioned by those like us who know the difference and know something here is off.

https://realitysynthesis.com/pages/neville-goddard-lecture-biblical-language-09-26-1969

That's the link to his lecture that goes into some of this. I might even just archive every one of his lectures here on RS for people to read over for themselves. One day.

In his book I quoted above he says "the awareness of being as God is states hundreds of times in the new testament". Where is this? Yeah Christ says I AM a few times and refers to himself as God and implies in his actions but how does that prove that Christ is a character of consciousness?

Eze 16:10 I clothed thee also with broidered work, and shod thee with badgers' skin, and I girded thee about with fine linen, and I covered thee with silk.

He says this proves that we're born into bodies as I quoted him saying before. The linen and garments spoken about in scripture are the bodies of the sons of God. That's why he always says about people are "waring garments" which we see and precise. The alchemist also said this too. He agrees with NG that the goal is to attain the "robe of glory".

"LAM i unconditioned. It is neither rich nor poor, strong nor other in him there is neither Greek nor Jew, bond nor free, male nor female. "

Whoa that's an insane doctrine I actually can't believe he said that. Does he not understand that Paul is referring to the Israelites that were lost and that Jew means Judean? He seems to have no idea what a Jew is. John 8 proves beyond a shadow of a doubt dual seedline doctrine, especially the Jews confessions about being Abrahams seed but not facing bondage. NG seems to think we all came from Abrahams seed, as in one of his lectures he eludes to this, saying under the context of how Christ revealed his gospel as I mentioned him saying early on in todays entry.

Gal 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.

People take this quote from Galatians WAYYY out of context every time. We know what it means, because Paul is talking to his own people, Israelites (as he describes himself from the tribe of Benjamin) and how those from Judea are no different from those in the Greek cities under the blood of Christ because we all go back to the proper seedline. That's actually what it means. NG assumes this is a universal doctrine. What blows my mind about NG and his doctrine is that it's actually a Jewish ideology he's buying into and yet the Jews had nothing to do with the bible or ancient Hebrews outside of being Edomites mixed with Canaanites and all that which they themselves admit to in their almanac and encyclopedia and that their rabbis admit to this too. Like what more needs to be said?

"“IAM that IAM”; such vain repetition id and fruitless. would be both stupid. It is not the words that make it effective; it is the consciousness of being the thing which makes it effective. When you say, “I AM”, you are declaring yourself to be. The word ‘that’ in the statement, “I AM that I AM”, indicates that which you would be. The second “I AM” in the quotation is the cry of victory. This whole drama takes place inwardly with or without the use of words. "

Here NG says that repeating words mindlessly is wasting time, which we can all obviously get behind. He's had examples where people have looped thoughts in their heads for hours and they got it, like that guy who said "I have a lavish steady dependable income with mutual benefit to everybody" or something like that. This guy locked himself in his room for most of the day and looped this in his head till he assumed it. Sounds like the opposite of what NG teaches here doesn't it. Yeah you could say he was "working himself into" the state, but if it's something that is a one and done why loop it? "That's how he does it leave him be as he wishes" they'd probably say to validate it.

The way I see the method of this is having still calm waters below with the nourishing fire touching the heart to conjugate and reflect a steady "state" of experience which can satisfy the natural striving where contrast is negated, otherwise you'll always be separated.

"The Bible proves beyond the shadow of doubt that Moses and the prophets, were in one hundred percept accord as to the identity and nature of God. And Jesus’ life and teachings are in agreement with the findings of the prophets of old. Moses discovered God to be man’s awareness of being, when he declared these little understood words,"

The book I'm copy pasting from is a jank version I got for free with notes on it written in the pages so it makes edits necessary to comprehend. /p>

Here's a link by the way.

https://ia904605.us.archive.org/12/items/interpretation-of-scripture-by-neville-goddard-compressed/Interpretation%20of%20Scripture%20by%20Neville%20Goddard_compressed_text.pdf

NG says that "the word" means "desire". The word was with God. He says that "The word, or desire, must be fixed with consciousness to give it reality. The awareness becomes aware of being the thing desired, thereby nailing itself upon the form or conception and giving life unto its conception, or resurrecting that which was a dead or unfulfilled desire". Here it's implying you plant seeds and that gives life to them. Notice how it's all about desire too, all about going after the fleshly lusts. The bible also explains this under correct doctrine as the fruit and seed have built into them the works they'll do based on who they're born from. Those who are born from above cannot sin as John said. /p>

1Jn 3:6 Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him.
1Jn 3:7 Little children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as he is righteous.
1Jn 3:8 He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.
1Jn 3:9 Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.
1Jn 3:10 In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother.

NG says of course the devil is the tempter or accuser or adversarial role, or a principle for doubt of the truth. The Jews of today have a master they serve and they definitely walk after the lusts of their father just as we see in the world. Christ sharply rebuked them and physically attacked them.

Back to this point he makes about states of consciousness and feelings. I've always said that feeling comes from theamtic sensations and those thematic sensations are going to thus determine how you experience that "feeling" as a sensory experience in the imagination. The stillness of the waters matters a lot. If the waters are not still because you're very very hot and the water is boiling then you'll be literally unable to anchor a "state" of being because you'll have contrasting feelings show up all the time. I know because I spent years with this and talk to people all the time about this stuff. Satisfying it involves purifying it by going through it, spending energy correctly, else how does it work. There's a fixed point of reference and the body determines that. You don't, The spirit communicates to the body, and NG would assume this is divine desire that you must accept, even if it means being evil like a Jew.

"You cannot put new wine in old bottles or new patches on old garments" he says. "That is; you cannot take with you into the new consciousness any part of the old man. All your present beliefs, fears, and limitations are weights that bind you to the present level of consciousness." In other words limitation needs to be transformed and you need to not see it as important, which means your supply of nourishment must purify what's showing up as bigger than it should be.

"To do this you take your attention away from all that is now your problem or limitation and dwell upon just being, and continue to do so, until you are lost in the feeling of just being, faceless and formless". So NG is telling us to do gazing and cultivate space, which calms the waters from being excessively hot and rapidly moving bringing up all the trash. Thing is a vast majority of people cannot do this without their bodies reacting negatively. Go out and ask anyone to do this and they'll tell you they'll feel uncomfortable, especially the ones who are younger and live online being stimulated by brain rot all the time. They literally cannot sit still for longer than like 30 seconds without feeling anxious. Why? Because their yin is depleted and they've got no space. Their unconscious mind is filled with trash and their nourishing current is so overwhelmed by the depletion that all they can do is partially run up against the space of stillness. Gazing would help any of these people as it would anybody but it's not as simple as it's made out to be.

"When the expansion of consciousness ((the subconscious capacity which is the overlap of conscious and unconscious) is attained, then, within the formless void deep in yourself ((reference to genesis?)) give form to the new conception by feeling yourself ((experiencing thematic currents come through you that are already there that you're still and able to "recollect")) to be that which you desire to be".

"You will find within this deep of yourself all things to be divinely possible. Everything in the world which you can conceive of being, is to you, within the present formless awareness, a most natural attainment".

So here we can see NG saying that cultivating space

"To be absent from the body and be present with the Lord". "The body being the former conception of yourself and the Lord, your awareness of being. This is what is meant when Jesus said to Nicodemus".

Joh 3:3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.

Then he quotes John 3:3 again. He loves this one. This obviously means that unless you're born from the correct seedline of generation then you're not going to inherit the kingdom because only this lineage was created by God. That's what we know. Look in the world and you'll see it.

What NG says is so tempting, because he's giving you a doctrine that validates lust, or anything else. There's no restraint because to NG restraint and even feeling mad about things is because you're giving into the devil. The devil is your voice of reason within you, and you shouldn't listen to your voice of reason. If you desire something then it's yours. That's his doctrine in a nutshell. Imagine it and own it and accept it.

""The husband is head of the wife" may not be true of man and woman in their earthly relationship but it is true of the conscious and the subconscious ((still failing to understand the overlapping of the UNconscious and conscious)), or the male and female aspect of the consciousness". Yeah obviously that's a metaphysical fact that even children can understand and observe. God designed things with order, no surprise. "He that loveth his wife loveth himself and they two shall be one flesh". Yeah obviously another manifestation of the alchemical principle. That is true on all levels, including the consciousness because of the way inner alchemy works on the mechanical level, but that doesn't validate it meaning that your imagination IS God. I AM. NG himself admitted we cannot avoid death, and yet here he says "with God all things are possible" so where's the state of immortality on a physical level then? Why can't I teleport through solid objects instantly at will? Even if I imagine that like a daydream where I lose myself in the experience it won't show up because I remember imagining myself in those places doing superhuman stuff all the time as a child, like many do, and yet they never happen. If the sensory experience matters not then how do the details show up automatically? Why do we have limits on our abilities? If all things are possible then does that mean that none of us have let go of our limits enough yet according to what NG says? It's simple. NG said you're going to die and the reason why is because you cannot manifest Jing out of thin air because you felt yourself there, unless the natural striving is present to do so, which may even transform over time.

""IAM that.” This understanding that you are the thing desired will cause a thrill to course through, your entire being. When the conviction is established and you really believe that you are that which you desired to be, then the second “I AM” is uttered as a cry of victory."

You feel that "thrill" because the fire touches the heart in a coherent manner with still waters. If the waters (the unconscious mind and mostly related to the yin of the lower meridians) is boiling and perturbed with disproportionate trash then all you'll get is bad feelings because you're FEELING the disturbances of the body and that's unavoidable with the mind if it's anchored.

"This mystical revelation of Moses can be seen as three distinct steps; I AM, I AM free, I really AM".

As I was writing about before in notebook 17 the heart and the kidney meridian where your foundation comes from (the unconscious at the base and the conscious residing in the heart (at least from a TCM view though HD sees the monopole there aside from ego)) is how this satisfying inner alchemical process can be played out. You must have the heart able to proportionately feel the fire from below without disturbances. So SOOOO many people feel a disturbed fire with disturbed waters and it causes pathogenic fire to destroy them because whenever you feel this "thrill" it's not coming THROUGH you but because you're artificially trying to make up for depletion of currents that aren't available in an attempt to feel natural. If you do enough gazing and go deep enough with the expanded space then yeah you'll have still waters and you'll be able to be moved naturally because intuitive impulse will hit "deeper" so to say in an instant and the spontaneity can play out naturally and the thoughts and all that will be without contrast, or not much if at all.

"Righteousness is defined as the consciousness of already being what you want to be".

What a load of trash, NG is saying there's no objective standard of morality or inner truth based on a love for the brethren, our own kind. This is natural that we see in everybody who's not raised in pathogenic environments.

"break off thy sins by righteousness"

"My righteousness I hold fast, and will not let go: my heart shall not reproach me so long as I live".

"My righteousness shall answer for me in time to come".

These verses are his proof of LOA.

"Now are these two? The Word of God is called Jesus Christ and the Word of God is called scripture. Now, you follow this closely: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God” (John 1:1). Suddenly this plan of salvation—for the word is logos which means “plan of salvation,” which means “meaning”; it’s a thought with a plan, with a purpose—suddenly it becomes a person. “He was in the beginning with God.” Now if the Word is God and suddenly now the Word is a person, is God not a person? Are you a person? You’re a person. Tonight I will show you from experience that you really are Jesus Christ."

This is from another lecture but I threw it in here because it seemed to fit. I find it interesting that he defined "logos" as "plan of salvation". I honestly believe that's a good interpretation for silent knowledge, natural striving, centripetal convergence as the inverse potential space (physics terms) which proportionately unfolds when available pathways are there. In practise what NG says works, but only really when all the currents for natural striving are present for that to be made manifest. He seems to think otherwise but when you look in the world the data would say otherwise. /p>

Isa 48:9 For my name's sake will I defer mine anger, and for my praise will I refrain for thee, that I cut thee not off.
Isa 48:10 Behold, I have refined thee, but not with silver; I have chosen thee in the furnace of affliction.

He says this also proves why we must exist in the body and have struggle. That's not what this is about this passage is about how we were once cut off but are redeemed.

https://realitysynthesis.com/pages/neville-goddard-lecture-the-bible-your-biography-2-5-1963

Here's another one of his.

He says that these psalms are about our incarnation and trial.

Psa 82:6 I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High.
Psa 82:7 But ye shall die like men, and fall like one of the princes.
Psa 82:8 Arise, O God, judge the earth: for thou shalt inherit all nations. <

We're like sons of God, angels, made in his image. That also supports his view but he sees everybody as the same. NG also views Gen 1 and 2 as totally different creation stories, the 1st being about intention and the other about experience.

I think I've gone into enough of this for today. It's clear that NG has not done a systematic exploration of the bible as I've done, connecting every scripture (well most of the core themes at least) to every other reference and then to experience and then to the world and history and metaphysics and alchemy. He makes some points that are obviously correct, but anyone who's even slightly metaphysically inclined could see that. His interpretation of the bible is not systematic and that's the issue, it's not complete. It's either he's done that work and hasn't written about it or he has and I haven't seen it yet. All his writings on explaining the bible are very very limited in scope and don't address many core themes that run through the bible such as seeds and fruit and the clear link between lineage and the differences in nations and their fruit and all that connecting the serpent to the devil in Rev. Is he proposing that the nervous system is the devil then? How could "that old serpent the devil and Satan" as Rev says connect to inhabiting bodies like serpents? He never has answers for these types of questions. The bible is one of those texts that is written in such a way where there's no chance of anyone without clear eyes to see to interpret effectively without also having the spirit of truth to infer those meanings into the world we experience. NG preaches the Judaic ideology as we've discovered, about exploring the individual idea of being. I do wonder how old this doctrine that NG speaks of is though. I'd guess it goes back to the days of Babylon, original Babylon, the oral tradition.

"If you would believe in your own wonderful imaginative world, everything would be under your control".

That quote right there from NG sums it all up. Imagination controls reality. Really what this actually represents is I want to experience what I want and I won't let any conditions stop me. This is coming from a Satanic ideology, self serving self exalting ideology. Putting yourself equal with God. That's what every tradition teaches except this one, and perhaps the Muslim tradition on the Quran but that's a joke so I won't even bother.

Interestingly I found reference to this book.

https://dn790008.ca.archive.org/0/items/MetaphysicalBibleDictionaryCharlesFillmore/Metaphysical_Bible_Dictionary_Charles_Fillmore.pdf

This is a book NG used to explain the bible.

Maybe this is another book to study. So much reading. Such little time.

I think the thing that makes people gravitate towards the NG interpretation is the lack of responsibility in the sense of objective moral responsibility to listen to their inner voice of truth and how the body feels about these things. This whole "we are all one" ideology is the most destructive thing imaginable. We clearly see what happens when we mix cultures. Things don't work. That's not my opinion. That's always been this way throughout history. History destroys NG and his interpretation of the bible, and really any so called metaphysical interpretation because there is an objective history. Those people will go ahead and say that this objective history cannot be proven and that It's subjective, as I've had discussions with such supporters and when they can't refute the mountains of data I've gone into they'll just go ahead and dismiss it all as subjective data that "I wasn't there for" which is an utterly insane proposal to state considering that a vast majority of the so called proof has various supporting sources which only amplify the authority of that and yet these people were just having their own experiences of a subjective experience or event in history that may or may not have happened. It's utter insanity the lengths the bible metaphysician will go to to justify avoiding actually studying history. They'll say there's probably more data that I don't have awareness of which would demonstrate my position to be incorrect and yet when I ask them to provide such data it's never available. It's always assumptions, always stretching and creating and inserting narratives to avoid the facts, the cold hard facts. We are in a culture conflict and that culture shapes the collective consciousness of our people over time. We've seen this happen over and over and over and the very people who created the interpretation of the bible that NG follows, the Jews, the "Hebrews", they don't even follow it themselves anyway. I've personally never seen Jews talking about the NG interpretation, at least discreetly.

I found this from a random website. I've never heard this before. You can find it here: https://maxharrickshenk.wordpress.com/2017/03/24/how-abdullah-taught-neville-the-law-he-turned-his-back-on-me-and-slammed-the-door/

"But if I judge from appearances, I would say, “Well, he can’t be a holy man.” For which today I am most grateful that he wasn’t! Because he taught me real Christianity. And he was born in North Africa, of Jewish parents, and raised in a strict Orthodox Jewish home. But he knew more Christianity than anyone I’ve ever met, because he spoke the Hebrew tongue perfectly. He spoke other tongues. And Rabbis would come to study with him. And he and I would discuss, day in and day out, for over five years, teaching me all that he could teach me that I could absorb concerning the Kabbalah the great mystery of how this thing is put together in these simple little letters of Hebrew."

This is NG quoted here too by the way I believe from the lecture this is copied from. I don't know which lecture this is but if you want to find it then you can. This is NG in his own words saying that Abdullah was a Jewish Rabbi. Interestingly enough he said that Rabbis would study under Abdullah. This Abdullah guy must've learned his stuff from somewhere, though we can clearly see the ideology linking to the whole universalism idea of "we are all one" and that God came down to earth to experience limitation to learn about himself more and expand his "consciousness" as if that means anything. They're admitting that God is flawed and limited and not created perfectly and that we're actually those imperfections by which the imperfection that God assumes the state of is imparted onto in a virtual reality experience. Sounds familiar doesn't it? That's basically what came out of the enlightenment era we went into some brief history through yesterday.

Yet more proof of NG being taught by a Jew. These fools tell me "Abdullah is an Arab name" and yet they don't actually understand that Rabbis have aliases they go by. We know that the Jews are cursed filth who will be destroyed because they have no truth in them. This Abdullah obviously couldn't see clear doctrine because he was blinded by his spirit of Satanic origin. He studied it and demonstrated his ideology. This is why I said that the bible is written in such a way I believe on purpose so that these false doctrines can come up as part of the false doctrines of prophesy unfolding in the world to deceive the elect. Goddard is seemingly under the assumption that his understanding is correct based on how incorrect the universalist doctrine is, which most people know doesn't work because it's devoid of common sense or reason with the whole multi cultural ideology and how the Jews cannot obviously be the chosen people. They don't satisfy any conditions of prophesy being fulfilled.

Charles Fillmore interprets "chosen of God" as this:
"chosen of God--God has chosen each of us as a medium for the expression of Himself as love, life, wisdom, abundance, health, and so forth. "Ye did not choose me, but I chose you, and appointed you, that ye should go and bear fruit" (John 15:16)."

So he says that the chosen are all of us, as in every conscious being, because apparently it's all consciousness and we're all equal as one people. No chance. I wonder how he explains the fig tree, or the tares, or the goats, or the part where Christ talks about his sheep, or his whipping of the Jews in the temple. He'll probably proclaim that this is an example of Christ expressing strength and overcoming the devil or something like that, though how would he explain the example where he calls the Canaanite a dog. You see how it's infallible. You could insert any stories into these examples and analyse their metaphysical composition and make up a meaning that apparently is there to explain away different parts of how consciousness works, like anyone would be able to write something like that without much challenge. The interconnected nature of scripture is what makes it challenging to fully comprehend. Since when would a child who reads the bible assume that the story NG is preaching is what they'd get out of it? Nobody would assume that in the days that the bible was written and a child reading it, that God was everybody and everybody was Christ themselves imagining and dreaming the world and that all the suffering in the world was because they imagined it, that these evil people are bad states of consciousness they've accepted. Where do you draw the line because if imagination is God and I can manifest anything I imagine (that I desire within the heart else it won't play out because there's no seed there) then that would mean I can teleport and be as a superhuman and run super fast and all this. I imagined that alllll the time. I even told a story where I seemed to have had superspeed for a brief moment when I was very young and that came naturally through me. Why aren't there limits on what NG says? Because of the body? Well then that would mean that some people and their desires cannot be made manifest can it? Wouldn't that mean that these desires can't be realised in the likeness desired, but would instead probably need expression through art or something similar.

Living naturally according to natural striving will automatically provide your imagination all the seeds to unfold through it when needed because it's who you're being automatically anyway. That's your fruit. I don't see how the bible is intelligently put together according to the NG interpretation. The connections between scriptures is almost meaningless in cumulative knowledge and adds little to our experience of reality or expanding on the essence of imagination creates reality doctrine. It's really just needless expansion of ideas to pad out examples of how they apply. Once again as mentioned above the Rabbis were coming to Abdullah to learn his method, meaning that unless you're learning from the interpretation that was either actually found by someone else or made up by them then you don't know. It's as I said before, unless you have a Rabbi to interpret the bible then you'll never figure it out.

I'll copy this from the Charles Filmore interpretation.

"chosen of God--God has chosen each of us as a medium for the expression of Himself as love, life, wisdom, abundance, health, and so forth. "Ye did not choose me, but I chose you, and appointed you, that ye should go and bear fruit" (John 15:16).

chosen people.
Metaphysical.
Along with the doctrine of hell and eternal punishment, there came into the theological world a very warped idea of a "chosen people." In the minds of certain churchmen and their followers the belief became general that God chose certain people to be saved in heaven, and elected the remainder of the race to eternal damnation. There is not the slightest foundation in the Bible for such a belief. There is, however, a beautiful teaching about a chosen people. In all the history of this race God has at different times chosen certain ones to do a certain work. Sometimes He made the choice of an individual, as Moses, Elijah, and Paul. Early in recorded history He chose Abraham, and then his family, and then the whole race of Abraham's descendants. This race of people were called Israelites and they were chosen for a special purpose in God's plan of blessing for all men. They have been watched over, kept, guarded, guided, and disciplined by the Most High in a marvelous way, that the seed of faith in the one true God might be kept alive and nourished in men and that a people might be prepared through whom His kingdom would be established upon the earth.

But the "chosen people" of the greatest importance are the class described by Peter in his first letter: "Ye are an elect race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for God's own possession, that ye may show forth the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvellous light."

The calling of Israel was justified when out of Israel came Jesus Christ, the world's deliverer and Savior. The ministry that He began in Palestine has been going on for two thousand years, and has not yet reached its completion. His great work of restitution calls for a company of tried and trained and spiritually developed people to work with Him in establishing His glorious kingdom of righteousness and peace upon the earth; these people are now being made ready. We are living in the times of restitution. Out of this generation the royal priesthood of those that are to reign as kings and priests (Rev. 1: 5, 6; 5:10, A.V.) will come. These people will be the beginning of the holy nation that is to fill all the earth with its glory. They are now the light of the world, and their light will increase until all the dark places of the earth are lighted up. By overcoming they are incorporating into their own consciousness the attributes, the virtues, of God, and are therefore becoming more and more the living expression of His righteousness and glory. They make up the Christ body that is so wonderfully described by Paul. Through them the world is to receive its restitutional blessings, and Jesus Christ shall be glorified as the King of this whole earth.

In individual consciousness "people" represent thoughts. Our "chosen people" are our spiritually enlightened and obedient thoughts. As fast as the various states of consciousness and thoughts in us become awakened by the inner Christ light and change their activities to accord with Truth, they enter the ranks of the "chosen people."

chosen people--The "royal priesthood" making up the Christ body; by overcoming, they have incorporated into their consciousness the attributes of God. They are the living expression of His righteousness and glory."

So that's his definition so "chosen people". Universalism if I've ever head it. No separation. How does he explain why Christ said he'd separate and divide the nations, and his people from the goats and all that?

He translates this too: "Massah (in A. V., Psalms 95:8, temptation), mas'-sah (Heb.)- causing to flow; melting down; proving; temptation; trial; solution; dissolution; complaint; murmur; calamity; evil."

Temptation. He says this is a trial of faith, meaning apparently there's built in trials for us. Is that what the division is about that Christ spoke about?

This is how he translates "the elect" that I searched for:
"Dodanim, dod'-a-n;m (Heb.)--covenanters; confederates; the elect; civilized; lovable; beloved; sympathetic; pleasing.

According to Genesis 10:4, a son of Javan and grandson of Japheth, Noah's son; he is called Rodanim in I Chronicles 1:7.

Metaphysical. Unifying thoughts (covenanters, confederates) of a very excellent character (the elect, civilized, pleasing) that belong to the intellect in man. Japheth, the second son of Noah, typifies the intellect, or reason. (See JAPHETH.) Javan, the father of Dodanim, also belongs to the intellect. Fallows says of Javan, "The interest connected with his name arises from his being the supposed progenitor of the original settlers in Greece and its isles.... Javan was evidently the name given by the Hebrews to Greece." This name is connected in history with the Grecians and the Syrians, and these peoples are symbolical of different phases of the intellectual in man, in its spiritually unillumined state.

While the intellect is prized very highly (beloved) by one who is just rising above the purely physical, and is far in advance of that phase of consciousness, yet its greatest degree of comprehension is much less than spiritual understanding. This is because intellectual reasoning is based on outer seeming, while spiritual understanding is founded on Truth. When the intellect is quickened and illumined by Spirit, it expresses in the highest and truest way, since it reasons then from the standpoint of Divine Mind, Principle."

So it seems he believes the elect are those who are intellectuals or something, which is probably why he associates it to Greeks and such who were intellectual.

"false prophets (Matt. 7:15).

Metaphysical. Deceptive thoughts that have been built up by error, selfish desires. Outwardly they present the appearance of being candid and open; inwardly they are ravenous for personal sensation and worldly gain. In order to attain their end they deceive even "the elect."

"By their fruits ye shall know them." Constructive, spiritual thoughts always yield a bountiful harvest of good; therefore the motive back of every thought should be watched prayerfully. Under the analysis of Truth all deception is brought into the light and the fact that the fruit is error reveals the motive to be error. The tree (motive) should be cut down and cast into the fire (denied).

family, the Christ--Jesus said: "Who is my mother and my brethren? And looking round on them that sat round about him, he saith, Behold my mother and my brethren! For whosoever shall do the will of God, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother" (Mark 3:33-35).

family, the universal--If God is the Father of all, then all men and women are brothers and sisters in a universal family. In the Christ consciousness we are all one. "

Yet more universalism stuff. Good luck getting the beasts of the field to follow this.

To me the only possible way that this could be proven is if the Tartarian empire of old could be systematically proven to be true, but all my investigations into that have yielded no consistent narrative which is why I don't follow it. There needs to be a consistent thread of data to follow. There's some old maps which have places mapped that are different to what we know today, Details elude me.

Fillmore interprets John the Baptist as someone of a higher state of awareness, more complete. "He signifies high intellectual perception of truth". He also says that John represents represents the process of baptism about how you removal of limited thoughts. Notice how it's all about thought control. No body intelligence. That's all mind. It's all mind according to this interpretation, but as I've said if that's the case then where's the limit on that? Why is there a limit on the mind? All of this can be explained through understanding inner alchemy under a TCM perspective and recognising that thematic functions that relate to different currents moving through different meridians and such will activate different functions of consciousness which NG interprets as all "imaginal" senses playing out. Thing is I've mapped a lot of that to biochemical processes, such as the hormones that get used in allowing you to actually transform resistance because if you're depleted on these things then you'll be almost unable to even feel the end because the current simply isn't AVAILABLE.

Availability is EVERYTHIGN. You can technically "create" more availability through going deeper into a subconscious state of expanse to tap more of the unconscious waters to nourish the lower circuit to put out pathogenic fire and allow a more stable state to come over you but I find often when doing this the the yang will feel less impactful because you've taken away in ratio more yang to yin than your baseline is use to experiencing and so you won't "feel" the contrast but it'll still be there and the naturalness won't be normalised effectively. Availability of vitality makes this all work. How do you do that? Common sense. NG would say that all the data gathered on nourishing your body with sun and good food and moving your body is just manifestations of an assumed state. Yeah obviously you're going to have an idea of where you're moving come into your mind but that's one level of the correspondence of the metaphysics. NG would simply say go deep and assume it, and yet they sit and feel anxious when they're in silence. NG would say to continue to sit and yet no silence comes. I've never had full on silence for extended times really, though you can get close at times.

No matter how you slice it the experience of breaking boxes and transforming stuff can all be mapped to the meridians, and hormonal shifts and even nervous system changes in parasympathetic shifts but those come about as a result of hormones being released and balancing each other which correspond to the thematic components unfolding as the state is satisfied. I will simply say that no matter how you slice it from an experiential perspective the LOA stuff will always apply, unless you begin to question how far it goes, because if revision applies to past history the way NG claims then that means all the history I've uncovered and all the design behind how it's played out naturally over centuries with the shifts in ideology and who's involved in playing those roles and all that wasn't just randomly ordered by a bunch of people assuming all sorts of thoughts in a sort of wild chaos of states but happened in a very elegant manner with almost predictable outcomes. NG sees nothing wrong with a universalism type environment, and probably denies the reality of culture mixing being an issue that's always been a problem and always will be a problem. The data shows that we don't trust other racial groups and their cultures by default, and we trust our own people more naturally. Now when everybody is buying into their own self serving ideology then of course collective trust even in the same racial group will be limited but it will still be there at the core. Are these all just manifestations of someone's assumptions that seemed to have crossed my path or what. There's an intelligence in how we're moved, an intelligence that we don't have any control over. If imagination is God then where does the self organising principle come in if we control everything or is it that the degree to which we control things only based on the fulfilment of a sensation of being within us, the "feeling" of being that person that we're looking to attain through natural striving. That would be the only way you could even come close to validating this idea in a way that makes sense on all levels because it would explain why there's limits in place, yet still revision and the changing of actual history doesn't work in that sense. Immorality that the alchemist has pretty much attained had nothing to do with LOA or any of that and he made fun of LOA multiple times as basically like the first step in occult initiation that people think is so big when it's really not.

The thing I will always say is that availability of vitality determines an outcome. If there's availability of vitality then natural striving will play out. Why do we even have limitations to begin with? Because evil exists in the world to play contrast. God will play both roles, though he doesn't tempt his people unless they're outside the covenant as we established before. Let me guess NG has some smart explanation for explaining the divorce of Israel. The divorce of Israel is explained in the doctrine I've explained here in a systematic manner so I don't know how NG would be able to explain it. I just searched the bible interpretation guide by Fillmore and there's no explanation for divorce in the bible. Never heard NG talk about it either. Wonder why. It's a HUGE part of doctrine and has implication in multiple ways. Christ ONLY came because we were divorced from Israel and the ONLY times that God is portrayed as Satan is during those times. Once again another missing piece of the puzzle.

Sceptics of this interpretation will argue "why would God create Adam and Eve and then allow his creation to be defiled by Satan and have all this suffering for nothing" and to that I will say what suffering. This whole earthly experience for the white race will be like a memory from times gone by, we do not suffer, which I explained yesterday as one of the so called contradictions that atheists love to bring up. We will look back at this time and think how interesting these times were, and how glad we are that they're over, because we're all redeemed, and those who elicit evil acts will be destroyed. All the evil will face judgement, even the works of Israel that are worthy of stripes will be given their punishment for making such decisions. The whole thing is that when you're born and elect then your spirit doesn't necessarily even desire the things of this world, it wasn't truth, the word of God, the righteous path, even if in the flesh in the moment that means suffering. It will be like any other pressure experience, and for others it wont' be so bad, but we have eternal life granted to us since the beginning so there's only suffering till Christ shows up and after that this will be transformed because we will be resurrected. When the body dies and is restored perfectly then all that trauma will be burned off. You won't feel suffering the same way, and these experiences will not seem "important' to you like how we apply RS.

To me the biggest issue is that the sons of God aren't simply incorporeal spirit but the fallen angels that came with Satan to earth, 1/3 of them. That's clear as day. Jude mentions their fornication. The apocryphal books also talk about this too, how the angels sinned and knew they sinned. How about the Jews that killed Christ and said let their blood be on our hands and the hands of our children? What about when God hates Esau and hated any other nation of people that's really not Israel, and how Christ said any plant that he didn't place on earth will be rooted up and destroyed. I thought God plants all plants, under the NG ideology that is. Why would it say that God didn't create them all, but are corrupt. Trees of corruption. There's so many holes in his model, that either have explanations that I've not seen yet or don't work and prove my point.

2Pe 2:7 And delivered just Lot, vexed with the filthy conversation of the wicked:

2Pe 2:10 But chiefly them that walk after the flesh in the lust of uncleanness, and despise government. Presumptuous are they, selfwilled, they are not afraid to speak evil of dignities.

2Pe 2:12 But these, as natural brute beasts, made to be taken and destroyed, speak evil of the things that they understand not; and shall utterly perish in their own corruption;
2Pe 2:13 And shall receive the reward of unrighteousness, as they that count it pleasure to riot in the day time. Spots they are and blemishes, sporting themselves with their own deceivings while they feast with you;
2Pe 2:14 Having eyes full of adultery, and that cannot cease from sin; beguiling unstable souls: an heart they have exercised with covetous practices; cursed children:

Apparently the people who "miss the mark" or sin in the eyes of NG are people who hate government (the authority of God) and are self willed and presumptuous. Doesn't sound like people who are simply unable to "accept the truth of the spirit" or anything that's implying they can be saved and thus redeemed. Any time unclean things are spoken it's never under the context of having transformation within them, for they will be destroyed. Pretty much every instance I can think of has examples of them relating to destroying them for being unclean or sinful. Why would it not speaks of them to transform their sin when spoken about outside the context of Israel. If all people spoken about here are states then can't all states or people be transformed under a universalist ideology? Yet another hole.

Need I continue. Unless you have correct doctrine then interpreting the NG view will seem far more tempting to buy into because it validates sin, and comes from unclean Jewish Rabbis who Christ rebukes sharply and Paul said were "cretins" and to not listen to their "Jewish fables". Plain as day.

Oh yeah also Fillmore claims that the cities of Greece that Paul went to also all have meanings, like Athens for example where Paul preached represents the intellect. That's honestly a stretch even under a metaphysical lens.

"Metaphysical. The Edomites were descended from Esau (hairy), who represents the body, or physical vigor. The Edomites therefore represent thoughts pertaining to the outer body consciousness.

Achbor represents a gnawing, fretting, destructive belief in evil, in the human consciousness, a belief that tends to weaken and to tear down the body (mouse, rat, gnawing) . Rats and mice represent a belief that evil is working underhandedly against one."

That's what he believes about Esau, who God hated. Apparently God hates physical prowess and the body who lives that, yet he created them. He says all the wars with Canaan and Edom and other nations represent different parts of your consciousness running up against each other.

"Edom, e'-dom (Heb.)--red; reddish; ruddy.

a The name that was given to Esau because of the red pottage for which he sold his birthright to Jacob (Gen. 25:30; 36:1-19). b The country where Esau's descendants lived
(Gen. 36:l6); this country is also called Mount Seir and Idum¾a.

Metaphysical.
The outer man, the body, or the carnal, physical phase of man's consciousness and organism.

Edomites, e'-dom-ltes (fr. Heb.).
Esau's descendants (Gen. 36:9). They lived in the southern part of Palestine, and later were enemies of the Israelites (Num. 20:18). They were conquered by David and became servants to him (II Sam. 8:14).

Metaphysical. Thoughts and tendencies in man that belong to the Esau or Edom consciousness. (See EDOM and ESAU.)"

So God hates the body and corporeal consciousness then. Interestingly they say that Esau is the Ruddy one. Perhaps this is where the Jews get their idea of the white people being their enemies come from? Why does God hate Esau under this context though? Why does God hate the body if the body is why God came down to begin with? The serpent who was made war against in heaven and cast out. If Satan is the serpent in the body that we're at war with and the body is Esau and the serpent are almost metaphysically related in that sense.

So the prophesy to Rebekah about the nations coming from her. Lets check Rebekah.

Rebekah, re-bek'-ah (Heb.)--tying firmly; fastening; binding; noosed cord; captivating; snare; beauty that ensnares, grace that enraptures.

Daughter of Bethuel, wife of Isaac, and mother of Jacob and Esau (Gen. 24:1567). The name is spelled Rebecca in Romans 9:10.

Metaphysical. The soul's natural delight in beauty. This essence of the soul is continually going forth and making attachments with the harmonious and beautiful (interpretation of Gen. 24:59).
Genesis 24:60: Through the inherent love of the harmonious, thousands are blessed and many hearts of "hate" are directed into other channels of expression.

"Adam, ad'-am (Heb.)--red; ruddy; reddish; firm. a The name of the first man of the human race, according to the Bible (Gen. 5:1-5). b A city (Josh. 3:16).

Metaphysical. The first movement of mind in its contact with life and substance. Adam also represents the generic man, or the whole human race epitomized in an individual-man idea. Eve is the feminine aspect of generic man, outwardly manifest: "male and female created he them. "

This next one is a very very long one. It's about Jacob. This page is already slowing down like crazy.

"Jacob, ja'-cob (Heb.)--heel catcher; lier in wait; supplanter; leaving behind; bringing to an end; recompensing; rewarding. The younger of the twin sons of Isaac and Rebekah, but the one who obtained the birthright (Gen. 25:26-34; 27:11 to end of The Book of Genesis).

Metaphysical. Jacob and Esau represent the mental and the animal consciousness within each of us. Esau, the hairy man, typifies the animal, which comes first into expression. Most of the human family let him rule in consciousness; but in the line of human unfoldment this man of nature, Esau, must be supplanted by a higher type, called Jacob, the supplanter, the mentality or understanding. Jacob also represents an idea of the I AM identity, through which the faculties of the mind receive their original inspirations. Jacob had twelve sons, to each of whom he gave an office and each of whom he blessed, or inspired, with his spiritual wisdom. The Bible narrative about Jacob and Esau has always been read historically, and theologians have had trouble trying to excuse Jacob and Rebekah for the apparent duplicity that they perpetrated upon Esau. When read in the light of spiritual understanding or considered as part of the history of the unfoldment of the individual soul, the incident loses its aspect of duplicity and we find that it is a description of the subtle working of the soul in spiritual evolution, under the guidance of Divine Mind. The soul is progressive. We must go forward. The soul must meet and overcome its limitations. Esau was a hunter--he finds his pleasure in the realm of animal forces. The cravings of the lower nature are in the ascendancy--Esau gave his birthright to appease his hunger. The "red pottage" mentioned in the Scripture symbology refers to the life substance of the body. The natural man is first in man's evolution. First that which is natural, then that which is spiritual, says Paul. We all agree that a strong body is required to express a strong mind; that is the divine plan. The men of the new race will have robust bodies; they will not be weaklings mentally or physically. Healing of the body is fundamental in the outworking of God's perfect-man idea. The natural man is not wise. Esau was a hunter, and he loved sport better than Spirit. He was not seeking development through soul culture, and in order to carry forward the whole man it was necessary to supplant and suppress him. This is the meaning of the deception by Jacob and Rebekah. The mental must gain the supremacy and the physical must lose prominence. This is what Jacob and Rebekah did.

They got Isaac (I AM) to acknowledge the mind as first in consciousness. Jacob went to another country, which represents apparent separation. An explanation of Genesis 28:10 22 is as follows: Jacob (the mental) went toward Haran (high place): the mind enters a higher state of consciousness.

At "a certain place" in consciousness the understanding is unillumined. "One of the stones of the place" that Jacob put "under his head" represents the contact of understanding with material conditions.

The "ladder" represents step-by-step realizations of Truth. These pure thoughts (angels of God)
ascend and descend in consciousness. "Jehovah," the I AM (verses 13 and 14), occupies the highest
place in consciousness. The spiritualized thoughts of the mind become the seed and bless all the earth
(body consciousness).

The Lord is constantly in our midst, and we must eventually come into divine consciousness (verse 15). The mind is startled when it discovers God to be an omnipresent principle (verse 16). In verse 17 is represented the realization that the body (house) is the temple of God and that the mind is the gate to heaven (harmony).

In the light of understanding, "the morning" (verse 18), the things that have been our steppingstones become holy and we anoint them with oil (love, joy, and gladness).
Beth-el signifies house of God. Luz means separation; that which has seemed separate and apart is brought into unity (verse 19).

Verses 20 to 22 represent the first attempt of the enlightened mind to covenant with God and trust Spirit for all things. Keeping the law of giving and receiving is recognized as a step in spiritual development.

Taking a wife symbolizes a unification of the I AM with the affections. Jacob was told to go to Paddan-aram (tableland) to the house of Bethuel (unity with God) and take a wife from the daughters of Laban (white, pure, shining) (Gen. 28:2-7). This points the way to a unification with the love principle in its higher aspects. Exalted ideas, divine aspirations, and pure motives are here designated as necessary to the union with the soul that the I AM is about to make. In Genesis 33:1-15 we read of the reunion of Jacob and Esau. In the 1st and 2d verses

Jacob (the mental) prepares to unite with Esau (physical expression). Mind and body must be joined before the divine law can be fulfilled.
Verses 3 and 4: The mind must be unified with the body in all the seven natural faculties. When the union between mind and body takes place a humility born of surrender of the self comes into expression.
Verses 5-7: The women and the children here represent the accumulations of the mind.
Verses 8 and 9: The mind is willing to share its accumulations, but the body (Esau) cannot receive the gift until it has been uplifted. In verses 10 and 11 we find that, after mind and body are reconciled and adjusted, they share alike the gifts of Spirit.
Verse 12: Jacob, the mind, should go before and direct the body (Esau).
Verse 13: The children, and the young animals in the flocks and herds, symbolize new ideas' being established in consciousness.
Verses 14 and 15: There is not necessarily enmity between the mind and body of man, but only a difference in states of consciousness. The body becomes an obedient servant of the mind when the two are unified in Divine Mind."

If the ego, or will, which is man, has adhered to wisdom faithfully and has carried out in its work the plans that are idealized in wisdom, it has created a harmonious consciousness. Adam in the Garden of Eden is symbolical of that consciousness.

Adam in his original creation was in spiritual illumination. Spirit breathed into him continually the necessary inspiration and knowledge to give him superior understanding. But he began eating, or appropriating, ideas of two powers--God and not God, or good and evil. The result, so the allegory relates, was that he fell away from spiritual life and all that it involves.

Man is Spirit, absolute and unconditioned; but man forms an Adamic consciousness into which he breathes the breath of life; this, in its perfect expression, is the Son of man, an expression of the divine idea. This Adam is all of what we term soul, intellect, and body. We are continually at work with this Adam; we can breathe into his nostrils the breath of life, inspiring him with the idea of life in all its unlimited fullness. We can lift up this Adam by infusing into him these sublime ideas, and in no other way.

Adam--Red; reddish. The first movement of mind in its contact with life and substance.
Adam was created from the "dust of the ground" (Gen. 2:7). Dust represents the radiant earth or substance. When spiritual man (I AM) enters into this substance and makes use of the God ideas inherent in him, he brings forth the ideal body in its elemental perfection. Adam was first perfect as an idea in elemental divinity.

Adam man--Unregenerate sense man; antichrist: the man who has fallen away from spirituality. Originally Adam was the spiritually illumined man of God. The Adam man was primitively identified with an infinite capacity for expansion. When he recognizes his identity as spiritual he expands in divine order and brings forth only good.

Adam man, ills of--The many ills of the Adam man grew out of his belief that he could satisfy and nourish himself with material food and drink alone. To feed the body is not enough. The spiritual man hungers for the bread of life and thirsts for living water, even the Word of God.

Adam man, transformation of--We are not to erase Adam, but we are to transform him by the renewing of our mind. "And be not fashioned according to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is the good and acceptable and perfect will of God" (Rom. 12:2). "

There's also this:

"Heth, heth (Heb.)--sundered; broken; weakened; destroyed; filled with fear dismayed; terrified; confounded.

Son of Canaan and grandson of Ham (Gen. 10:15). Ham, son of Noah, pertains to the physical in man. It was from the children of Heth that Abraham purchased a burial place for Sarah; these descendants of Heth were inhabitants of the land of Canaan at that time (Gen. 23:3-20). Esau took wives of the daughters of Heth, which was very displeasing to Isaac and Rebekah (Gen. 26:34, 35; 27:46).

Metaphysical. A very active thought of fear, terror, dread, the result of thinking apart from Spirit (sundered). These errors are among man's greatest enemies; they belong to and dwell in the adverse, carnal consciousness. The Hittites, representing thoughts of opposition and resistance were descendants of Heth. Resistance and opposition are the direct result of fearfulness; people fear many things and they set up a resistant state of mind, which expresses in their words and acts, as well as in their thoughts, and brings trouble. Like so many of man's internal enemies, fear springs from a belief in a power of evil. Only the love of God, and a firm belief in the one Presence and one Power, the good omnipotent, will eliminate fear from man's consciousness. Having won the victory over fear, he will dwell in safety and there will be nothing to molest him or to make him afraid (see Leviticus 26:6 and Zephaniah 3:13)"

So it seems that different races of people represent different degrees of a state, under a given son father relationship in the genealogy. More advanced sons I'd guess would be more fearful states.

Also this:

"Hethlon, heth'-lon (Heb.)--swathed, bound about; wrapped up; place of concealment; lurking place; stronghold.

A place mentioned by Ezekiel as being on the north (Ezek. 47:15).

Metaphysical. The strong tendency of intellectual man, through his highest sense reasonings, to keep the Truth wrapped up and hidden from view instead of clearing it up so that it can be comprehended in its fullness and reality. (Hethlon was on the north border of the land. North signifies above, in man's consciousness, and refers here to the reasonings of the intellect guided by outer observation and by the senses. Man can never, through reason alone, find God or come into an understanding of spiritual Truth. The understanding of Spirit springs from the indwelling Holy Spirit. Man receives this understanding by inspiration.)"

Random.

This is on the Jews.

"The Scriptures portray the Jews and the Gentiles. The Jews, in their highest sense, represent the regenerate. They are those who come into consciousness of the power of the spiritual man. They are the "chosen of God"; they are the people who are coming out of generation, who are coming out of the material, carnal, animal man, into a higher man. The Gentiles are those who are in generation. They are under the law of the man of flesh.

We set spiritual ideas working with just one object in view: the introduction of the regenerate consciousness. When we have received the full baptism of Spirit and have come into the Jew consciousness, we are conscious of a new spiritual formation within us. This is the new creature in Christ Jesus, and the carnal man is transformed, readjusted, and lifted up into unity therewith.

When Jesus spoke of salvation's being from the Jews He meant that salvation is of or from the regenerate man. There is no salvation without regeneration. One must put on a new mind; one must take the ideas that are presented by Truth, and adjust the whole man to them. Every department of man must be lifted up. There must be a new man in Christ Jesus and the old man must pass away."

Wow so Jews in this bible doctrine are seen as good.

"Jew, jew (fr. Heb.)--of or belonging to Judea. ((CORRECT))
A man of the tribe of Judah; more broadly speaking, a Hebrew. Mordecai, the Jew (Esth. 2:5), was a Benjamite.

Metaphysical As a descendant of Judah, son of Jacob, and as a member of the tribe or kingdom of Judah, a Jew signifies a thought springing from and belonging to the praise and inner-life consciousness of the individual. As a Hebrew, which a Jew is in the broader sense, the significance is the same as that of HEBREW, which see. For the symbology of Mordecai the Jew, see MORDECAI. See JEWS also. Jew--Broadly speaking, a Hebrew. ly, a thought springing from and belonging to the praise and inner-life consciousness of the individual.

Jewess--The soul or feminine aspect of that in consciousness for which a Jew stands. jewels--"Jewels of silver, and jewels of gold" (Exod. 12:35) represent wisdom and love in the external sense, which are to be asked for or demanded by the Children of Israel. This means that we are to affirm that all wisdom and all love, even in their most external manifestations, are spiritual. This puts Spirit in control both within and without.

Metaphysical. "Jewels of silver, and jewels of gold" (Exod. 12:35) represent wisdom and love in an external sense, which are to be asked or demanded by the Children of Israel (the word "borrowed," in the Authorized Version, is an error). This means that we are to affirm that all wisdom and all love, even in their most external manifestations, are spiritual. This puts Spirit in control both within and without, and does away with the external ruling power that is the "first-born in the land of Egypt." The "firstborn" of every state of consciousness is the personal 1. When the flood of light from the Universal is let in through our declaration of the one wisdom and one love, this I of every mortal state of consciousness is slain and there is a "great cry in Egypt; for there was not a house where there was not one dead." Jewess, jew'-ess (fr. Heb.)--a female Jew. A woman of the Hebrews (Acts 16:1).

Metaphysical. The soul or feminine aspect of that in consciousness for which a Jew stands. (See JEW, JEWS, and HEBREW.) Jewish, jew'-ish (fr. Heb.). Pertaining to the Jews (Tit. 1:14).

Metaphysical. Pertaining to that in consciousness for which a Jew stands. (See JEW and JEWS.) Jews, jews. People belonging to the tribe and kingdom of Judah only, or to the Hebrew nation generally (II Kings 16:6; Matt. 2:2).

Metaphysical. Jews in their highest aspect symbolize divine ideas, or spiritual consciousness. Each individual has his formless and his formed mind, and they seem in the present race consciousness to be hostile one to the other. In Scripture these are referred to as Jew and Gentile. Mind has two broad aspects, the formless and the formed. In its formless aspect it is a unity; in its formed aspect it is a diversity. It might be compared in its first aspect to vapor, and in its second to that same vapor precipitated into crystals of snow. In the vapor aspect there is a homogeneous whole; in the snow each little crystal has form and character peculiarly its own. Raise these inanimate crystals to the plane of thought and free will and you have a parallel to the formed mind of humanity. In the New Testament, Jews symbolize our established religious thoughts and systems of worship. The Jews were always the hardest to reach with the new thought. They were very set in their religion, and they usually refused even to listen to new teachings of Truth (see Acts 13:45). So we find in ourselves that our religious convictions frequently stand in the way of our accepting the new revelations of Truth that come to us. The orthodox church has a very large number of people who are truly spiritual and would quickly grasp the real import of Christianity were they free from the restraints of religious habits of thought and worship and from the established customs of the church. The Jews symbolize our religious thoughts and the Gentiles symbolize our worldly thoughts. Paul was determined to reconcile the Jew and the Gentile (Acts 21:13, 19). We find that there is a separation between our religious thoughts and our worldly thoughts. We have built up a Sunday religion and thrown around it a wall of sacredness. In it are rites and ceremonies and sacrifices according to a standard fixed by some sect, whose teachings about God we have accepted as true. Then the broad Truth of the Holy Spirit enters the mind and begins to break down this wall of separation between the religious thoughts and the worldly thoughts. It perceives that the principles involved in the Fatherhood of God must go to the uttermost parts of the mind and the body and unify them in Spirit. Fixed traditional religious thoughts, the Jews, that follow the letter of the law rather than the living Truth that seeks to unite in spiritual harmony both Jews and Gentiles, are the opposing force in Jerusalem (the religious consciousness) that would hinder the word, presented by Paul, from doing its work (Acts 21:11). But the living word of Truth cannot be killed. Paul's words of JEZER

Truth were bound for a time, but they have filled the whole world. So it is with the living words of Truth now being sown in our consciousness: they will do their work of restoration throughout our being"

Well that's a lot. So Jew in this means multiple things. Mostly Jews relate to "spiritual" type thoughts, interestingly enough, while gentile is worldly thought. Beast. It seems that jew could represent a thematic association to experience.

"Joseph, jo'-seph (Heb.)--whom Jehovah will add to; Jehovah shall increase; he shall increase progressively, i. e., from perfection unto perfection."

This is Joseph son of Jacob.

"Judah, ju'-dah (Heb.)--praise Jehovah; celebration of Jehovah, laud Jehovah; confession of Jah. a Fourth son of Jacob and Leah (Gen. 29:35). "And she conceived again, and bare a son: and she said, This time will I praise Jehovah: therefore she called his name Judah: and she left off bearing."

Jacob's blessing on Judah was (Gen. 49:8-12):
"Judah, thee shall thy brethren praise:
Thy hand shall be on the neck of thine enemies;
Thy father's sons shall bow down before thee.
Judah is a lion's whelp;
From the prey, my son, thou art gone up:
He stooped down, he couched as a lion,
And as a lioness; who shall rouse him up ?
The sceptre shall not depart from Judah,
Nor the ruler's staff from between his feet,
Until Shiloh come;
And unto him shall the obedience of the peoples be.
Binding his foal unto the vine,
And his ass's colt unto the choice vine;
He hath washed his garments in wine,
And his vesture in the blood of grapes:
His eyes shall be red with wine,
And his teeth white with milk."

b The tribe of Judah was composed of the Israelites who were descended from Judah, the fourth son of Jacob. When the kingdom of Israel was divided, this tribe stayed with Rehoboam, Solomon's son, and became the kingdom of Judah (II Sam. 5:5; I Kings 12:20). At this time the tribe of Benjamin was with Judah (II Chron. 11:1). Moses' blessing on the tribe of Judah was (Deut. 33:7): "And this is the blessing of Judah: and he said, Hear, Jehovah, the voice of Judah, And bring him in unto his people. With his hands he contended for himself; And thou shalt be a help against his adversaries."

Metaphysical. The Hebrew meaning of the word Judah is praise Jehovah. It is evident that Judah represents the spiritual faculty that corresponds to accumulation or increase in the mental; this is prayer and praise. Prayer should be a jubilant thanksgiving instead of a supplication. It quickens the mind and makes it draw, like a magnet, that from the realm of causes which fulfills one's desires. At the very apex of the brain is a ganglionic center that we may term the center of reverence or spirituality. It is there that man holds converse with the intelligence of Divine Mind. This brain center is the home or "house" of a spiritual consciousness, which is in Scripture designated as Judah, whose office it is to pray and praise. This faculty is also called the superconsciousness; that is, it is above the various states of mind, but not separate from them. It pervades every phase of thought as an elevating, inspiring quality. All lofty ideals come from this faculty; it is the inspiration of everything that elevates and idealizes in religion, poetry, art, in all things that are true and real. This is one of the foundation faculties of the mind. It is that consciousness which relates man directly with the Father-Mind. It is quickened and enlarged through prayer and all other forms of religious thought and worship. When we pray we look up from within, not because God is off in the sky but because this spiritual center in the top of the head becomes active and our attention is naturally drawn to it. One of the offices of the spiritual faculty is to gather ideas. Through it man can draw, from the universal Mind, God thoughts; that is, ideas absolutely true. Therefore prayer is accumulative; it accumulates spiritual substance, life, intelligence, and everything else necessary to man's highest expression. When we pray in spiritual understanding this highest realm of mind comes in touch with the universal and impersonal Mind, and the mind of man is joined to the very mind of God. Thus God answers our prayers in ideas, thoughts, words, which are translated into the outer realms of form, in due season. Praise is closely related to prayer, and is an expression of spiritual consciousness. Whatever we praise, we increase, through law of mind. Praise is the positive pole of life. Praise is the key to the increase of life activity. If you depreciate your life you decrease your consciousness of life. Thus w e find that Judah, besides symbolizing the place in consciousness where we come into touch with the highest activities of Divine Mind, typifies also the central faculty of consciousness. It operates in body consciousness through the spinal cord, as well as in the top head, and finds its outer expression through the life center, which, unregenerated, is "Judas," who had a devil. When life is separated from the other faculties and endeavors to express without their cooperation, man gives himself over to his animals in human forms. In Acts 3:2, the "door of the temple which is called Beautiful" signifies spiritual understanding. This door opens when we pray and praise. Among the twelve faculties of the mind, as typified by the twelve sons of Jacob, praise is Judah. When he was born Leah said "This time will I praise Jehovah." "Peter and John were going up into the temple at the hour of prayer." Some persons think that the understanding of the inner life can be attained without prayer, but they are mistaken. All who have reached heights in things spiritual have been noted for their devotions. Jesus was a striking illustration of this. He spent whole nights in prayer, and He seemed to be asking the Father and thanking Him in almost the same breath on every occasion where He did a great work or expounded a notable truth.

Judah means praise Jehovah. This tribe is often used to designate the whole Jewish nation, indicating that praise is an active principle in our spiritual thoughts and should be given first place in all our thanksgiving. "Bless Jehovah, O my soul;
And all that is within me, bless his holy name." Praise keeps the soul fresh and pure and beautiful. It is the power that opens the inner portals of the soul to the full and free inflow of spiritual light and aspiration.

The tribe of Judah, which remained with Rehoboam when the kingdom of Israel was divided (I Kings 12), represents the central faculty of consciousness. It may be roughly described as the focal point of body organization. Its physical expression is the spinal cord, yet this is but the visible aspect of an invisible energy. This energy or mind substance at the very center of the man is susceptible of the highest and of the lowest. It is the serpent that may resist divine wisdom and crawl upon its belly in the dust of materiality, or it may be lifted up and exalted to the most high place among the faculties of man. When it is sensualized it becomes Judas, who had a devil. It is related in I Kings 12:20 that the only tribe that followed Rehoboam was Judah. Thus persistent sensuality vitiated the very core of the man, and he lost control of his other faculties. This is often observed in people who have lived on the sense plane until they are animal nature. In II Sam. 2:1-6 the "cities of Judah" are aggregations of thoughts in the praise consciousness of man. Gratitude is another name for this state of mind, symbolically known here as Judah. Praise and thanksgiving multiply and increase everything that we center them on. Jesus gave thanks before He raised Lazarus. He gave thanks before He multiplied the loaves and fishes. Scientifically, He was increasing the thought stuff until it precipitated into the realm of visibility. "Go up into . . . the cities of Judah" and use the law as here stated, and you can bring forth whatever you set your heart on. The kingdom of Judah, over which Asa was king (I Kings 15:9-24; II Chron. 14, 15, 16), ly represents the inner life force of man's organism. We usually refer to this inner life force as the vitality. Those who are not students of mind have but slight comprehension of the real character of these subjective energies. They know that the heart beats and the blood circulates; that digestion and assimilation go on, and that the body is the most wonderful structure in existence; yet they are ignorant of the intelligent power that directs and sustains its intricate machinery. An intelligence transcending that of the intellect is manifest in this realm under the heart. Symbolically it may be said that another man presides there, who in these texts is designated as King Asa. (See ASA.) The purging of Judah and Jerusalem (II Chron. 34:3) signifies systematic denial of errors of thought and practice, that have become habitual in both the objective and the subjective realms of consciousness. "Asherim," or "groves," were symbols of the Phoenician Venus, the goddess of love, and were usually of a sensual character. ly, the "molten images" and the "graven images" mean the productions of the imagination that are first in a free state and then in a formed state of consciousness. The lascivious imagination is the "molten" state, the second step of which is the "graven image," or physical sensation. These are both to be purged and denied in mind and body. We thus dissolve or make "dust" of these conditions; they go back to the formless and inert. The burning of the bones of the priests on the altars means the sacrificing or giving up of the material or gross forms of our religious ideas of God. You may have overcome sensuality, and changed your ideas about the personality of God, yet be clinging to some personal spiritual leader or priest. Burn these "bones" by vigorous denial of human foolishness and ignorance, and affirmations of divine wisdom. In ancient times it was (and today in some instances is) the habit of the devout to give special reverence to the priest or the spiritual leader and to call him father. Jesus commented on this manworship in Matthew 23:8-9. "But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your teacher, and all ye are brethren. And call no man your father on the earth: for one is your Father, even he who is in heaven." After purging the mind of error by denial we should see to it that we put the builders to work upon "the temple." Denial is always destructive and leaves vacancies in the consciousness to be filled up with true statements. When vigorous denial is followed by a feeling of weakness, we may know that we have destroyed some thought structure on which we have been depending, and have built nothing in its place. The carpenters and builders are the universal constructive forces of Being. These are always at work in the organism when right thought is holding sway, but after a siege of error it is necessary to start them anew by using affirmations of substance based in Truth--"hewn stone"; the unity of good- "timber for couplings"; and the eternity of the now--"beams for the houses.""

That took so long to format. Whenever I paste this stuff in it's all spaced and there's lines missing and I have to join it all together.

Anyway I don't even know where to start my brain is fried. I need to come back to this later.

Fun note. This guys bible dictionary never mentions the divorce nor does it mention punishment by stripes mentioned in the psalms and proverbs Deuteronomy. The fact that the divorce is not mentioned is a huge hole. I need to find the metaphysical definition in their own words. I don't know how you'd explain it, because divorce is literally to separate, and separating from God would be impossible right? NG claims there's no objective morality because three's no law of course. Basically NG would say that since we're all one mind and there's no real difference in consciousness at it's core that any attempt to rationalise barriers to natural striving in the world are self imposed limitations out of ignorance of self. I'd guess. Self. This whole idea of self being transcendental is the core theme. The thing is that it's a never ending self contradicting process, because if God is perfect in all ways then why are we here having this experience to expand that awareness? God hates the body (your incorporeal consciousness for some reason hates the body and its senses yet that's the reason why it's here so that it can expand itself further out of pressure to be through the body) so there's no real way to unify these ideas. Under racial covenant doctrine God is perfect as he is and his glory transcends our capacity to experience, which is why no man hath seen God, except through Christ of course, or the spirit within us, but that's FELT more so. According to NG then we all have the spirit since all of Israel has it, which means that racial barriers are based on a limiting view of the other who is really still yourself on a level that's more still than what the senses can experience at base. We already know this, and it sounds so much easier on the mind to accept than the massive interconnected web of parts that RS has become to systematically explore the phenomena of consciousness. I don't even know where to begin in systematically exploring the NG metaphysical doctrine of the bible and spending literally months connecting dots. At least all the dots are there for me, mostly, I just need to recognise them.

I will say though that racial covenant doctrine has many common threads with NG doctrine too, because recollection is part of it, which God said he'd hide the truth about our identity up until recently. Now NG would say "look that proves my doctrine" but it also proves this one too,, considering all the shifts that happened in culture and books being written about Anglo Israel as well as what Hitler followed which was part of that shift in identity of Israel that would be a clear landmark of this recollection. You could argue that the NG interpretation would be more significant though because LOA and such has taken off WAY more than this doctrine, by literally tens of thousands of times at least. If we're going to systematically destroy NG and his metaphysical interpretation we're going to need to connect not just the personal experience of it but the collective experience, because that's objective and everybody can view it and see it.

The morality that comes from following traditional values in the bible and the eradication of Judaism in the world as one of the core themes of it cannot be underestimated as an important thread of doctrine. Judaism and Satanism and all the self serving ideologies that come under it which disregard the feeling for another in order to attain pleasure of the sense and stimulation of the body are at odds with being moved by the spirit where natural striving for pleasure is intrinsically more controlled and feeling for another is built into our seed because we're connected on that level. NG could claim the same about this whole states idea. How do you "disprove" what NG preaches though, because in practise it works, up until you begin to question the extent of it though of course and asking the question of how does historical significance of events that we've explored here on the notebook validate or invalidate the racial covenant doctrine, or dual seedline doctrine. It seems that for the purpose of application a vast vast majority of people will say "so what" and ignore the deeper study because that doesn't interest their natural striving which means that speaking to the truth requires a more simple and efficient means of explaining the depth of the historical studies, such as questioning certain events validity such as the holohoax, but then you run up against the "conspiracy theorist" wall. How do you manage that? You can't really it's spirit that needs to be open to awareness. Even if NG is correct how do you explain these historical events being as they are. They'll say "so what it doesn't impact you". That's what would be said, and yet I feel naturally drawn to question such things to find deeper threads and many others are too. Should we just disregard this data on history being falsified and businesses being built around these events being falsified? Should we just ignore and die to that importance? If we die to that importance would it then matter? If you postulate the idea that if your natural striving did shift through a change in state then wouldn't that indicate that the importance of finding those hidden facts no longer seems like something you actually have energy to want to study and thus all that feeling of importance on finding the truth is now basically dead? wouldn't that then characterise the dulling of the spirit of truth under dual seedline doctrine?

It's a constant circular movement. At this point defining importance of natural striving needs to be established and where the anchor is. Is the anchor in the body or the spirit? The anchor to me seems to be in the body based on how we feel things, but the spirit is within us that the body translates "spiritual sensation" that's on a thematic level into visceral sensations that the conscious mind can swim in and experience. In this case natural striving comes from the spirit, as Christ did say. We have to recognise that desire within us that seems to want to move towards a direction of opposing ideologies of what we find to be important under the context of "finding truth" more often than not will come from a place of wanting stimulation to feel good. Gentile desire, in that sense from the NG terms. So it's either Jewish desire or gentile desire. I don't even see how that works in scripture to be honest, the whole "heathen" vs the "spiritual" people and their variance in body importance vs spiritual importance has little correlation to scripture from what I know. Another contradicting idea I find is that while in a divorced state with the prophesies of the major prophets about how a saviour will come and the reflection of many end times prophesies in the OT too, how this can explain God moving through us but without Christ? That there will BE a saviour to come that God promises not to hold anger against us forever and that we will be redeemed. Is this simply about the idea that the corporeal consciousness can get lost but God will always be there to manifest for us whatever it is we're in?

I just don't know. I KNOW that the dual seedline doctrine is solid especially when it comes to recognising history and the culture conflicts we're in right now and how the bible clearly talks about how we're flooded by foreign peoples and stuff as punishment for sin, but then on the other side from the NG lens that would be saying that we'll manifest bad thoughts from the lusts of the body and the senses of the eyes and ears disconnect from the Jewish sense (that sounds crazy to say) which can transcend the limited senses. The way i see this is "slow down and make space and disconnect from the body" to be saved, which from a vitality perspective is a big part of the process. The idea that heathen will be used against us works on both sides, because there's physical AND metaphysical manifestation, though the thoughts can be positive or negative and still manifest outcomes based on wherever you're being moved to that might not even be intended consciously. I never planned to end up here and yet here I am. This was never my aim. though the theme of studying reality to find deeper hidden secrets was always there. I always wanted to be at the top, the best of the best, and that's how I've manifested y reality, because it was just within me already. In fact that's part of my nodal view of my design chart, so it's definitely already there. This is what I mean by how there's both metaphysical and physical significance to consider here. You can't just throw out all the historical studies as irrelevant to your life experience and you also can't just go out and say that there's no LOA phenomena. LOA is explained in the bible using dual seedline doctrine anyway. I've posted about some passages relating to that. Luke has some of them I know. The dual seedline doctrine has no contradictions as far as I know, and if it coherently explains the bible physically AND metaphysically then isn't that a slam dunk against NG? The thing is that the Judaic ideology is at total odds with the morality perspective with fixed laws to follow vs subjective states with no objective laws or anything that's fixed we must conform to other than the sensations of natural striving. This is why the doctrines are at total odds with each other. You cannot reconcile the core of their doctrine. One is based on what we can observe in the world and what we can experience regardless of the world around us because the world reflects the inner state. That supports the relativity and quantum models, and multiculturalism, and all the degeneracy that we see in the world as "just states that's part of the play". Basically they see all this historical stuff and what's happening now as part of the movie to not get involved in, and yet it seems that people must be impacted by it else the play couldn't operate the way it does, and if everybody in it is saved then why is suffering so rampant? Did I create all this suffering within me and therefore I can imagine away the Jewish influence? Were all the people who tries to fight back against Jewish banking just fighting their own sensory delusions about who they were?

This is the contradiction I see, because NG is telling us that these things in the world don't matter. They don't matter to us and our experience. They say we need to distance ourselves from these historical deceptions and ignore them basically because looking into them means you're placing importance on the world and not on what you want. Notice that, it's always based on things that you desire. Desire desire desire. I've gone over why approaching LOA from a fulfilment of desire standpoint will never really fulfil anything, yet NG says that when you've gone through all the states your consciousness is needed to (however that's measured) then it will begin to open up and you finish the play, That's revelation. The "revelation" that you were playing all the roles all the time on every level, fractally speaking. The Jewish ideology is never about actually creating anything though, they're always seeking to transform base substances into something that's higher order, with the ultimate intention of rebirth or in this case resurrection. Resurrection of what? the spirit that was lost inside the body, inside the literal skull.

The way I see it is that from the LOA NG perspective all these physical level threads we've observed and are following as clear connections to dual seedline doctrine are only there under the context of how we're simply observing the pre-determined parts the play that we shouldn't really be involved in having a stake in because that's not for us. They're there, the bible exists and has history, but that's simply one level of manifestation of the metaphysics we're observing here which is why the threads are so similar. The contradictions come when it comes to primary doctrine. Following sanctified laws vs following your body and how it feels desire. What's more important? What's more correct? What's the truth. Both? One? The other? None? Well if you ask me I say that if we're going to live naturally and our determined seed is fit for destruction because we're not white for example then acts we perform are going to be coming from a place of degeneracy from the eyes of God. God did say he'll be a lying tongue to us and he'll give us over to a reprobate mind and give us what we desire (for better or worse) if we choose that.

I do not know how you could make sense of these contrasting ideologies. There's still contradictions in what NG preaches as I've explained because it denies the history and any objective sense of morality that we have built into us or that we must follow and that the suffering in this world isn't because of not following the law of God but because we're not following our inner truth, so to say, under the LOA sense. The absolute frame of reference of the aetheric model of physics would demonstrate that consciousness is not subjective but fixed and absolute. Thing is that we know that the thematic elements correspond to how we experience body sensation based on "spiritual sense" so with all those mechanics in mind it explains the whole LOA state stuff but then you could say that the LOA state stuff is made manifest THROUGH these mechanics. This is why I say you can never truly say that it doesn't exist at all unless you get to the point of questioning the limits by which it's applied and then of course you get to the history discussion and how the circumstances the world you're born into are determined. NG says that you're born into a world just like this one when you die and that you pick up with a life already under way that you won't even recognise you died before in, and there's like these overlapping seeming timelines and such, else how would NG be able to determine that? Basically NG says it's all a dream and God dreams everybody at once which is your imagination so Imagination is God and if you assume a state then you also influence everybody else's state, but then you get to the contradicting statement of "what happens when 2 people imagine the same thing" because if other people are also God that influence me then how do I know that I'm not being impacted by them? How does my desire impact others? Do they even exist then or are there infinite versions and everybody has their own little bubble of reality but if that's the case then how does reality even generate from within a bubble without any supply of ideas to feed into it as well as doubts and such that come through media. Is the Jewish filth in the world only existing to provide us a challenge to assumption in that case by making resources unavailable at baseline? All I see are contradictions in LOA cosmology where it simply doesn't work when you view it under that context.

So really the question still remains. how do you fully refute LOA and NG and the metaphysical bible interpretation? Cosmology? History. I don't know to be honest but there's more than enough holes in the LOA doctrine of the bible and how it relates to the cosmology and history that I doubt that this is THE truth about reality, even if it's the easiest to assume. In practise if you're sufficient on space and vitality then you'll just naturally unfold all the seeds anyway without ever having to know any of this. I just don't know really. My brain is totally dead at this point.

All I do know is that if I want to I can experience whatever I desire, and under the Holy Spirit I don't desire anything that is degenerate. Objectively degenerate. How does LOA reconcile degeneracy in the world? That's right God says he will play those states to test us. The adversary is built into reality for us to overcome, just as the alchemist says. The adversary is there to keep you in the box. So at that level challenge is built into the matrix of the LOA cosmology and every bubble has an adversarial intelligence we could say then manifesting opposing experiences to "test" your faith. This will manifest in all the ways that it will, all the way to the end. Basically NG says that if you desire something and you have a limitation or a gentile thought in the way of it then it should be challenged.

Well how come Paul tells us that Jewish fables should be rebuked and that they're "cretins" and to be avoided. If Jewish thought is spiritual then how come the Jews are spoken bad against all throughout scripture? What about the harvests? NG would probably say that these are harvests of the experiences that God has through us and that the impure (heathen or bad thoughts and fruit) will be discarded and burned away, yet isn't that valuable to the expansion of consciousness? Corrupted trees will be destroyed, trees representing bad thoughts, burned up in the fire. Why eternal punishment then? What's with the eternal part of that relating to angels that sinned? Once again there's still contradictions in the LOA NG view of the bible. The temptation to want to live lawless and go after lusts is so alluring with the NG stuff because it's all indulgence then and basically not holding yourself responsible for anything that you shouldn't worry about based on natural striving. This lack of responsibility permeates the NG doctrine, disregard the world and its rules that limit you and accept the desire. That's the practical of what NG preaches. Satanism. Is this not true?

I just don't see how that can work, and yet one some levels it does, but those levels are all explained under dual seedline doctrine anyway so what's the point? What can NG LOA explain that the dual seedline doctrine can't? Dual seedline explains it all, history and cosmology and morality and "manifestation" and the context under that too. It is also understandable to people who are new to the bible, so long as they don't have preconceived notions. I bet that if someone read the bible brand new without any ideas on it then they'd get a physical literal interpretation (obviously) and they'd understand that the gentiles were divorced Israel if they follow the story through from the beginning and if they read the racial descriptions then they'd know which seedline they're talking about and interpret it correctly. It's all correspondent and works. The main difference is spiritual vs literal physical interpretation, and the spiritual view says that the physical interaction with the world is not real while the physical interpretation says both physical and spiritual are real. Which one sounds more common sense to you? Manifestation is still 100% explainable without the law including why there are limits that aren't just artificially imposed as well as the nature of the adversary and all that built right into your metaphysical composition so as far as I'm concerned simply by fact of explaining more about the phenomena of consciousness in general that RS and the dual seedline doctrine of the bible can explain far far more about reality than NG and LOA can because they're by definition all about denying the senses to basically filter reality into being how your natural striving desires it to be, and yet the threshold on your degree of influence in that is still limited as we observe so it's no absolute in the sense that imagination is God and controls all of reality as I literally quotes NG saying "control" with. So with all that in mind you can negate the importance of the LOA NG interpretation of the bible and the contradicting cosmology under the context of everything we've learned in LOA and how that ideology is permeating to distract us from what's objective and objectively spiritual, instead of subjectively real and objectively spiritual. I see it as extremely ignorant (literally ignoring information but that's the ideology of LOA so no surprise right) that their entire ideology is founded on the idea that the historical account never happened. So its either every historical piece that's been found to support this happening which I've explored are fabricated and or placed there to make it seem that way or that this historical narrative is part of the metaphysical unfolding as the dual seedline doctrine plays out because it works on multiple levels at once, as that's the nature of the perfection of God., unlike God in the LOA doctrine where God needs to learn and expand because he is imperfect.

Side note. I've found multiple sources now talking about how Hitler published his own version of the bible with all of the OT cut out and some of the NT also cut out. I find this to be very ignorant of him but his doctrine is still dual seedline none the less. I don't find it of massive significance but the fact that he apparently cut out the whole OT and claimed it was a Jewish book surprised me. I've heard this one before, I've yet to find source material for this but it wouldn't be impossible. His basic doctrine was sound but it seems he's missing much of the details o the OT and how it explains the NT. That's just another curveball in the mix of this strange history. The holohoax never happened, and yet all this happened around that regarding the removal of Jewish ideology from Germany. It seems that from LOA view the Gov we have is just part of the play and we have to accept it, for better or worse, though wouldn't that go against the very nature of the principle of imagination controls reality where you could change that tyrannical immoral Gov? I'd LOVE to imagine these Jews gone and everybody living in nature in their own racially pure cultures free from mixing and all this stuff. It would be amazing, but that's what the kingdom to come is described as.

Trees.

"trees.

Metaphysical. "Trees" represent nerves, and nerves are expressions of thoughts of unity; they connect thought centers. In Ezekiel 47:7 the trees growing on both sides of the river represent the nerves radiating from the spinal column, and connecting and unifying the whole organism through the nerve fluid.

The "tree" (Gen. 2:9) signifies the connecting link between earth and heaven --between body and mind, the formless and the formed. "Every tree that is pleasant to the sight" pertains to the perceptive faculty of mind. It is always pleasant to perceive Truth. The substance of spiritual thought is the "food" that is good. The "tree of life also in the midst of the garden" represents the absolute life principle established in man consciousness by Divine Mind. The roots of the tree of life are centered in the solar plexus region, and they are symbolized in the physical organism by the nerves.

The generative center in the loins of man is the point at which the physical man contacts life, but when the consciousness has been redeemed and man has placed himself in the "garden" through I AM,

Jehovah God, he contacts the "tree of life" at the solar plexus region, or heart center, and from this center exercises authority and dominion over the whole current of life in the organism. The "tree of the knowledge of good and evil" represents the discerning capacity of mind. Man first perceives Truth; then he must discern the relation of ideas before perfect activity is set up within him.

Jehovah God told Adam to avoid the tree whose fruit was a knowledge of good and evil, "for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die." It is evident that this tree is closely related to individual free will, which is in direct touch with the "serpent" or selfhood. In that state of consciousness, or day, the individual shall surely die.

The branch that separates itself from the tree withers away and dies. So a belief by the ego that its life, substance, and intelligence are self-derived cuts off the source of supply, and the ego begins to revolve in a mental vortex whose dominant tones are good and evil, birth and death--duality. It is through the affections, the feminine in us, that we partake of both good and evil. The soul, or woman, was given to man by Jehovah God, and is the avenue through which the inspirations of Spirit come. When the I AM assumes mastery over the soul it brings forth only good. If man could lay hold of the tree of life while thinking both good and evil to be real, he would go on living in the negative part of his being and would bring destruction upon himself.

Man lost consciousness of his divine nature in Spirit, and so must begin again to lay hold of the potential ideas in substance and must "till the ground from whence he was taken." The spiritual life is protected from the coarser consciousness by the "flame of a sword which turned every way," or the word of God and "the Cherubim," sacred wisdom. Man can regain entrance into Eden only by being "born anew" of Spirit.

The "tree of life, bearing twelve manner of fruits, yielding its fruit every month" (Rev. 22:2) is explained as follows: The "tree of life" is the inherent life of the organism; it is symbolized in the physical by the nerves and the spinal column. The spinal column represents the tree; the nerves, which carry the living waters, are the branches and the leaves of the tree. Every month a transmutation of the living waters takes place, under divine order; thus are the "twelve manner of fruits" produced by the "tree of life . . . in the midst of the garden," the spiritualized body. (This latter text reverts to Gen. 2:9.) Man is kept from partaking of this precious, healing, life-giving fruit only by thoughts of sensuality. When this phase of sense consciousness is taken up in Truth and eliminated, and the idea of purity is built in, man's body begins to express its original holiness and perfection. We eat of the fruit of the "tree of life" when we appropriate ideas of divine life, ceasing to dwell on life as something that comes and goes, or something that is governed by birth and death. tree, oak--An oak tree in itself stands for something very strong and protective; but in Hebrew it has a deeper significance than this. The word comes from the root from which is derived the word

Elohim; so we are reminded of the truth that those who trust God as their defense, as their refuge, their fortress, and dwell "in the secret place of the Most High, shall abide under the shadow of the Almighty," and shall not only be kept from all evil and its results, but shall continue to grow and unfold in understanding, in spirituality, and in every good. "tree of life" (Gen. 2:9).--The eternal, omnipresent life of God that is within man. The tree of life "in the midst of the garden" is the innate, indwelling idea of immortal life, and the fruit of that tree is the consciousness of eternal life in the body.

The "tree of life" (figuratively in the midst of the garden) manifests in the body as a reserve force. The brain is the center, the solar plexus is the subcenter, and there are innumerable minor centers throughout the organism, the spinal cord, and nervous system. A conservation of the life and substance of the organism is necessary to its spiritualization and redemption. "tree of the knowledge of good and evil" (Gen. 2:9)--Indicates a dual state of consciousness, a belief in both good and error, which eventually drives man out of the garden (his body temple). tree, olive--Growing both under and above water, represents the restoration of unity between the material and spiritual, or God and man. trinity--The religious terms for the trinity are Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. The terms are mind, idea, and expression.

Father is the source, origin, essence, root, creator of all. Son is that which proceeds from, is begotten of the Father, like Him in nature, and essentially all that the Father is. Holy Spirit is God's word in movement: the working, moving, breathing, brooding of Spirit, made known to men through revelation, inspiration, and guidance. The Holy Spirit is the Comforter who will bring all things to their remembrance.

The doctrine of the trinity is often a stumbling block, because we find it difficult to understand how three persons can be one. Three persons cannot be one, and theology will always be a mystery until theologians become Metaphysicalphysicians.

God is the name of the all-encompassing Mind. Christ is the name of the all-loving Mind. Holy Spirit is the all-active manifestation. These three are one fundamental Mind in its three creative aspects."

Trees in this never relates to lineage, obviously because it's metaphysical.

Late night update

Stuoid mobile version of the text editor changes the formatting and makes it bigger. Whatever. Anyway my point is this. How does LOA explain the default condition of the world and the fact that tons of people die in wars, the Ukraine one for example, where honest civilians are having shells rip through their houses. What about all the Germans who got sent to the rein death camps that Eisenhower wanted to use to exterminate them all? Did they all imagine that or assume this? What about events in history where collective wealth was made available when Jewish banking was dissolved. I’ve talked about this before. What determines these types of collective shifts in consciousness on a mass level that involves millions of people? How does history get shaped through the will of just a few higher up Jews who plan on exterminating a bunch of Germans end up killing millions in other countries? How does that work? What they’ll say to avoid answering this obviously is “that doesn’t impact you so why worry it shows you’re holding importance on others lives” and yet someone would naturally feel for these people. It’s a Jewish ideology satanic. They basically need to deny that suffering exists on a collective level. They say God sends enemies to us if we’re in a bad state but that’s always personally based is it not. Did I manifest Neville Goddard existing with the so called law? How did I determine this idea if I’ve never heard of it before. All these things they’ll never explain, and will bypass responsibility and pass it off to “ways and means we know not of”.

This is the point. Does the metaphysical bible interpretation determine there to be a fixed definite unfolding of collective events or is this allllll in my state? If other people reflect parts of my own state then how does that correlate to the current situation with geopolitical realities in Gaza and Israel for example where we’re being given fake news to program our view. Is this part of the program? Why is the program so deceptive to us and lies to us and forces us to wear masks when they decide it’s lockdown time over so called viruses that don’t exist or to get injections to keep your job. Why is it like this and not more supportive and that we have more of our own personal struggles. I find so many in LOA are totally ignorant of these things and will avoid looking at them because looking at them would mean that the bubble isn’t as solid as they would like it to be. The comfortable bubble they’ve established and live in doesn’t want to be popped, it feels pressure when those boundaries are being stretched. Most of these big name coaches who actually do practise what they preach obviously end up less empathic generally speaking and this is the state of self serving ideology that serves Satan.

We’re tempted by what NG says because it gives us a basic pathway to pretty much experience self gratifying pleasure in life without consequence. It takes out the moral responsibility for restraint and balance and community where everything turns into profiting for yourself and prioritising yourself and all this satanic trash they all preach. Yeah you should value your vitality which represents your sense of self but coming at it from a parasitic perspective is an issue and yet from the LOA NG bible view that’s weakness that’s avoiding your potential to experience abundance, or whatever the idea of abundance is from the self serving ideology. I don’t preach any of that trash because it is by definition parasitic and ends up manifesting a world where people struggle to get by. That’s Jewish ideology. This is what Christ speaks against and what those in LOA support because it’s all about you. Notice the culture around this and the ideology and all that stuff. The support for this idea to help you feel better. The grounding isn’t in blood truth of being a redeemed Israelite but it’s based in this idea that you’re God and you can experience anything you desire. That opens up temptation like nothing else because if your God then there’s no moral justification to not be able to experience something. In LOA the ideas of restraint and empathy for others is basically thrown out the window because it’s all based on playing your role be it good or bad. This is satanic and this is what the tares live by. It’s filthy Satanic Jewish ideology seeping into Israelite nations to seed ideas that sin is ok and we can accept sin and that the history of Christ suffering for our race to be redeemed didn’t even exist. They’re anti-Christ by definition. They have no balance and no morality and no sense of self sacrifice because self sacrifice for the other in LOA terms would be a bad thought that should be avoided.

You can see the obvious issues with this ideology. Yeah it’s got truth on some levels but as with all good satanic ideologies that draw well meaning Israelites into temptation it’s going to have some nice dressing on it to make it seem shiny when in reality they’re thorns in our sides waiting to be felt in the aftermath. There’s nothing good that can come from this other than punishment from the one true perfect God who’s name is Jesus Christ who is our kinsman redeemer and died only for the race he created so that they may have eternal life. NG has never recognised the historical significance of the things we’ve explored and as far as I’m concerned the massive grey area that comes with the LOA doctrine will never be fully explained or systematically explored on every level to demonstrate legitimacy as the true doctrine of the bible.

I will continue to explore the LOA doctrine more thoroughly and find anything I might be missing. I can’t say I’ve done a full systematic refutation of what NG says without addressing every single angle possible and answer every question they can’t. RS is the only complete model of manifestation on earth currently and probably will ever be, but who knows.

What I do know is that NG has zero risk in his message and his message supports the Jewish elite. His position threatens them not, and yet we live in a world where both sides should exist to balance the act right? Why would the stage act end with us being destroyed and systematically enslaved by Jews and flooded with migrants who will destroy our history that we have generations of family who built and maintained with their blood sweat and tears just to let it all go because “we’re all one” and these ideas are sinful because they’re of the world. What a joke. LOA supports the Jewish establishment which is why it’s so popular and so well known unlike the doctrine I’m speaking of which explains everything. NG preaches Satanism in disguise. There’s no objective meaning to anything in LOA because it’s all God experiencing himself as all good and bad characters and there’s no need for morality because if you desire evil then evil you will do if you own the state, or being poor or being born with genetic health issues. It’s true that you can’t control your birth conditions and your fate is sealed before you’re even born but that makes far more sense then reality being about the letting go of the attachment to the world and anything that stops you from experiencing bliss.

NG always spoke about bliss. “I am blissfully married”. The bliss of his cricifixion. You know these NDE’s also refute the NG stuff, because people often experience contrary things to what they believed. You’ll hear atheist NDE stories where they went to hell despite never believing it and the opposite too where Christian’s will say they met some other God or something they didn’t expect. NG said that when you die you wake up in a world that you don’t even recognise as different, like he’s said the example of you don’t even know you die when you do, and yet here’s these stories that are backed up by the surgeries having recordings of what the NDE experiencer told them happened while they were dead that would’ve been impossible if they had no brain function. They clearly had spiritual experience but was that them being in that experience or was that fed back into them like an implanted memory ahead of time because the bible makes it clear what happens after death truly. I personally believe that there’s some deceptive force that exists to play with these peoples experiences when they die, but I can’t prove that for sure. The amount of universalism NDE’s that say people from every race and religion were there with God in heaven is insane to me and is 100% contradicting with scripture. You either believe what the word of God says or you believe the fairy tales (Jewish fables) that are preached by people who still don’t know Jesus Christ their redeemer and God above all who will utterly eradicate the enemies on earth when he comes. Nobody knows the hour. NG thinks that the titsnic happened because someone wrote a story similarly to what happened on paper in a book before it did, yet doesn’t have an answer to explain why flying dragons and other mythical creatures don’t exist despite tons of people reading fantasy books. This to me irrefutably proves his position to not work, regardless of how coherent his bible interpretation is because it simply doesn’t work on the level that is said it can. If my imagination is God and whatever state I experince manifests then why can’t I be in a state where dragons exist flying in the sky dropping lots of gold on all our houses! There’s no fixed point of comparison with what NG preaches and he’s just another satanist in disguise and he will get flogged in the end by his father for being a naughty boy spreading false doctrine.

If reality really is like what NG describes then I subscribe to what 2B from nier automata says in the opening line. “Everything that lives is designed to end. We are perpetually trapped... in a never-ending spiral of life and death. Is it a curse or some kind of punishment? I often think about the God that blessed us with this cryptic puzzle and wonder if we’ll ever get the chance to kill him”

Well said. Kieth Cerelli would love that line.

You can “manifest” whatever you’re available to experience. The “feeling” is natural intuitive impulse coming through your body because the currents are available and metaphysical pressure gradient mediation will play it’s role and the people involved will reach out if needed to play their parts. No mind magic needed to explain it. NG is done and there’s nothing more to say. Anyone who still buys into LOA is an absolute joke who needs actual brain scrubbing. They really need Jesus Christ but we can joke too right.

Read scripture and pray. Our time here is limited to make it last and have gratitude for being born white, even if your situation isn’t ideal currently.

Interesting idea here. According to LOA it would have to be like this. If I assume a state where I view reality existing where Jews are evil and currently there’s zero evidence for that, then if I continued in this feeling then gradually history would change to reflect this and I would find evidence through history that supported my position and in the current world. Thing is did that history exist before I assumed this? Am I dynamically creating history with certain intelligently defined events throughout time demonstrating that Jews are evil and when I change that assumption that since I no longer experince that and I think they’re now good would that past history vanish that I no longer partake in or even consider as real? Would other people forget who I would’ve spoken to? Would any data I’ve gathered on the subject magically vanish off my drives or that my drives die and the data is lost and the websites get taken down or however it naturally plays out to confirm the assumption. How would that work? I’ve browsed the entire web for someone answering this question systematically but I’ve never seen an answer that’s satisfying. Am I also manifesting not finding answers?

My point is how is history and or other events that are totally out of your scope of awareness come into your awareness? Like how does an infant have things intelligently unfold in life without any awantess of it say in war zones for example despite not understanding what’s going on around them? Some will say we forget our lives as infants but some don’t. I remember some bits but it’s vague. Either way think back to your earliest years of experiences and 99% of the time they’ll be highly emotionally charged experiences, something that “hit” hard. A high contrast feeling. Those stick out. According to NG natural states stick out because they change direction of manifestion. I ended up here because I questioned why others couldn’t see auras that I use to believe I was seeing and that I thought I had superpowers. I had all kinds of people magically attracted to me back then like I mean people throwing themselves at me without even wanting it or thinking I was even worthy of it to be honest I just gazed a lot on a regular basis and attracted all kinds of interesting things and really lucky outcomes. Nourishment. Vitality.

I assumed that I wouldn’t get attraction but I did, because many years before people always told me that I’d never get it but when I stated gazing it showed up like magic and my beliefs never changed. I still felt “isolated” back then and alone yet they threw themselves at me and o made friends super easy and whatnot when I was gazing. It was so easy and yet that’s all I did. I just saw myself as special and different, but still isolated and alone in my own world. I had friends and stuff I hung out with on the regular but that wasn’t the scope of attraction and new friends coming in easy and life opening up. It was something that I don’t see a correlating assumption with to explain how it played out. I did manifest experiences like people saying I’m glowing because I use to tell myself that a lot when I’d do my early version of mirror or arm gazing but I never expected others to say that to me. You could say it was a natural unfolding of assumption thoigh I’d argue it was just how having more space and vitality available at a younger age made me experience reality and how people responded to me. If I tried to manifest life like that again it wouldn’t be the same based on what I’ve learned and where I am now. Also nobody has proven real age reversal using the so called law. Still waiting to see the real age reversal testimonies. I’ve had people tell me I look really young like even a teen on multiple cases and had security pull me up as I’ve said many times before but those aren’t actual age reversal. I still looked the same, though perhaps I’d have a shift in s temporary sense that was perceived by others.

No matter how you slice it anyone who does LOA stuff is doing Reality Synthesis anyway so there’s no separation except I can explain history and temporal stability in reality and how there’s no dragons flying in the sky or aliens flying around in small saucers on the road with us.

8/4/25

Answers. Need answers. The page is already super slow and I've only just started so that's something.

There's an interesting idea about how the bible is made manifest in the world physically and metaphysically because if prophesy is unfolding physically that we can point to and then also the metaphysical would invariably correspond automatically, thematics. How else would you explain it? Why would the NG bible interpretation need multiple different accounts of the gospels and other historical events with multiple witnesses if it's simply trying to lay out a principle? How would it define the world in which we start off with and the progression of consciousness in developing culture and conflict and historical associations to that which we can see today? Like how is history experienced under this model is the biggest question, because history to me is one of the most understudied things there is. Are the contradicting historical accounts that are pushed by Jewish media vs what actually happened suppose to exist in reality to enable the contrast of views and thus open up the state that I'm in now? All these things I've contemplated on before in the past but I've never had complete examples that are able to explain them systematically. We have historical data on the literal stories, though nothing that's 100% going to irrefutably prove it, because we're piecing together fragments.

If you look at it purely metaphysical it would be all confirming. From the physical view the dual seedline doctrine is clearly what we see in the world, OBVIOUSLY, but at the same time the metaphysics aspects also have implication, but the thing is that those metaphysical aspects can't exist in a vacuum without also having physical manifestation at the same time. There's data that supports a great flood happening based on the fact that basically every culture has a flood story, even in the same likeness or similar to the biblical account. This is what I mean by the metaphysical interpretation must also have manifested as the prophesy physically predicted to play out including the race war stuff, and that it's part of the program on the physical level. So it makes me wonder then that since there's the dual seedline doctrine that connects a ton of dots to physical history and then the metaphysical analysis which can (mostly I'm assuming here) explain the "consciousness is God" idea then they'd have to almost compliment each other in how they unfold, so that we're existing within the unfolding experience of the physical interpretation and at the same time we're unfolding the metaphyscical thematic supply demand process that RS has explained fully with all the inner alchemy on the level of personal navigation within that pre-determined collective trajectory. We simply cannot throw out the fact that Jewish filth are running the world, but in that sense wouldn't these thematics be fixed then? The correct trajectory would then be related to how can we navigate through those fixed thematics in a manner that serves our vitality, and in a manner that's not parasitic. Will those who are designed to play parasitic roles play parasitic roles because that's their baseline trajectory they're integrated within, vessels fit for destruction, the beasts with no civilised culture? Thing is that if there's any fixed functions then that would mean we don't create everything in the sense of controlling events using states, but more so it would be that a state or a thematic expression would lead you through that collective experience without it impacting your life in a way that's destructive to your vitality, because vitality is everything.

The only way to reconcile these points is to accept that there is a collective trajectory which is fixed but that you simply navigate through it in a manner that doesn't impact you, and the whole being responsible for collective trajectory is truly a delusion because you have no influence on it, and the people who are making the big moves in pushing forward the Jewish agenda and their relativistic ideology of universalism as made manifest metaphysically on many levels would be played by people who would naturally be moved to play those roles. Natural striving. In that case it's all pre-determined wouldn't it be? In that case it's the entropic experience of time dilation from the frame of reference from the body vs the singular consciousness which would have this all unfold in an instant. If God is perfect and has all within then what's the whole expansion idea for then still? It is because it is. Sounds like more Jewish contradicting ideology. It's either the nature of reality is truly relative because you'd never be able to really disprove it in the absolute sense of three's an absolute frame of reference which is moving this all and our lives are effectively pre-determined, or at least we have fixed trajectories which we can seem to consciously move into or out of, and that's where this whole timelines stuff comes from which only overcomplicates things more. When we base it off what we know to be demonstrated throughout history and the Jewish agendas playing out then we can clearly see a morality conflict, but that would be built into the physical manifestation of the metaphysical side of things and that the dual seedline doctrine in principle exists and there are people born of inferior moral compass when it comes to their natural striving and those who are chosen to be actors for good in the world, and on top of that the history we explore is revealing the natural striving decisions that were made by each of these parties in manifesting those thematics into the collective trajectory to almost "drag" us all along with it in the thematic implications and how that will trickle down into the individual reality for those who are involved.

You cannot make LOA in a vacuum work, though you still can make dual seedline doctrine work in a vacuum too. There seems to be metaphysical aspects as well as physical aspects in the bible, and that we're created as we are with the natural striving that we have as both doctrines seem to support, though more so the physical one. Jesus the Christ walked the earth over 2000 years ago, and the intricate historical data that is recorded in the bible cannot be thrown out as exclusively mental states because there's too much detail there to see it as just irrelevant nonsense that isn't actually part of the text. We know that the beasts of the field and their culture is NOT compatible with ours, and that preaching tolerance is only going to cause natural division based on our built in biological instincts. This is what I mean, how can the bible in the metaphysical sense be all about love and such when often times the program of collective trajectory is at complete conflict with that, and how resources are made artificially scarce and how there's been periods of time in history where millions of people suddenly had their lives taken out under their feet almost overnight. This would mean that there would have to be an external influence moving the thematic associations people will be basically forced to assume and accept (mostly unconsciously of course) in the way that these historical events unfold. The Eisenhower death camps, the abolition of usury under King Edward, the technological boom we've all lived through recently where collective vitality is at its all time lowest by a mile. These very rapid shifts in collective experience that are backed up by Jewish ideology and the elites which support making this manifest aren't things we consciously assume. If the end desire is to have tech we have today, say the theamtic composition of the state is relating to "freedom" (authority and liberation from wood element and some metal) and "communication" (very fire based as you're "projecting" energy) and "effortlessness" implying a lack of need to expend energy to attain the outcome, like higher tech making physically laborious jobs easier. If this is the end desire that that's an example of the composition of what would be experienced then how would it manifest in a manner that would end up with Jewish parasites being the ones who market the tech and make it profitable for them to deplete our vitality and push political agendas and hide certain information to us? Why did it manifest in such a way? This is the point I make, what determines the overarching context of the "morality" underlying HOW it's playing out. What determines who's righteous and who's not because it's obviously not a black and white thing on a metaphysical level because nothing would have any basis to anchor in, the body is fixed in everyone (except for racial characteristics of course) and the world is another manifestation of that, with the biosphere and how all the ecosystems interact. That was created intrinsically almost in a sense that's built into who we are. The body might contain these programs, though LOA doesn't really say this.

No matter how you slice it there's a fixed direction of movement at LEAST on a collective level which is pre-determined. I do not see how culture mixing will cause unity when culture mixing all throughout history has always destroyed nations. Culture mixing is metaphysically what LOA would support because it's more under the ideology of "unity" and all that new age trash but I still wonder about if this is the trajectory that the program wants on a thematic level and that it's being made manifest through the Jewish systems that we can trace through history and relate to dual seedline doctrine and the Jewish admissions themselves and even including the meanings of many of the hybrid creatures in the bible born of fornication relating to mythological creatures in Greek mythos for example. I just find it funny how the white race are the ones who do not worship serpents while everyone else does. This is what I mean. It's like the reality that we live in is built in such a way where these culture conflicts are built in as we've explored for a purpose to open the option for division and conflict to be experienced on those levels. If division and conflict is the basis of reality and only suffering is guaranteed then it would imply that the lesson to be learned is to transform the conditions causing it, yet if it's intrinsically built into the program that we have no seeming influence over in any meaningful way then that's a contradicting idea, unless it's only applied to our personal navigation within it and that throwing a certain sense of morality to conform aside to avoid conflict. If you can see the Jewish ideology in the world for what it is then how can you navigate this reality without moral conflict without letting go of those morals? Is that part of the limitation in accepting the natural striving and that conforming to the system is really just a necessity for most people so they can navigate that moral dilemma without facing suffering and separation and division? Christ said we'd be persecuted for his name sake, and we are. The metaphysical level in a vacuum doesn't explain why the moral dilemma exists in the conflicting manner it does, and for different people too.

The ones who abandon responsibility for their brethren will likely navigate the collective trajectory in a way that benefits them more, though under that context you'd assume someone who's living in a more abundant state separated from the conflicts of the moral dilemmas of the system and simply has accepted the decisions they make as normal by throwing away that inner voice of reason, you'd assume that they would also in turn manifest the circumstances around them to be more abundant with relation to other people and the general overarching economic situation wouldn't you? If there's a spill over effect then wouldn't it impact surrounding thematics as well under that ideology? This is once again another aspect that cannot be explained without fixed functions of consciousness. I simply cannot see a way of it making sense.

This whole study is unbelievably insanely complex on so many levels it's mind bending even for me. I just don't see an interconnected web of thematics that can correlate between them on a complete level, though some can relate as we've explored. It doesn't work on all levels though and that's why I say that the LOA interpretation of all is mind cannot be true to the very core unless all is mind has limitations intrinsically built into it that LOA doctrine simply hasn't outlined clearly yet in any way. It can't all be mind because if it was then everything would be meaningless and all caused by subjective random thoughts that originate out of seemingly thin air that systematically somehow manifest all surrounding circumstances like generative AI painting in holes in an image intelligently based on a suggestion you give it. It's just a program then, mechanics unfolding eternally. God doesn't exist in the sense that we'd personify him in Christ for example under that lens. God is a force of nature, or the point of supply for all unfolding and emanating thematics. Once again this self contradicting ideology doesn't work when you view it critically as we've explored. The only real way that it can make sense is that it's correlated on both the principle metaphysical and physical levels, though the metaphysical level would imply that the physical is a product of assumed states and not the fixed trajectory though we've said that there's a clearly observable timeline of how things unfolded according to dual seedline doctrine that makes complete sense on pretty much every level you look at it. So what then is the truth? Both? The LOA idea is at odds with the moral responsibility for the seedline Christian because to God both good and evil are just states that unfold into experiences that are then subjectively interpreted to be good or bad for that person in how they feel. People are moved to be either depending on the ideology they serve, which dual seedline says is built into you. If it's built into you then are we really consciously deciding? In dual seedline if it's possible to act unrighteously and face consequences for it as judgements (what we obviously see in the world today with all the pacifist mindsets of depleted men with no TEST or understanding of their racial background to Christ) and yet we have within us the seed to not sin by nature then it was through external temptation built into the program which interacts with us and suggests ideologies which break that nature then it would imply that our navigation through life will no matter what you do always involve conflict if that's your target intrinsic nature because the world around you is insanely immoral. How could you live in a state of abundance when you see the Jewish filth for who they are every day when you walk down the street and see rainbow culture trash and other gods on shop fronts and this stuff, the things that Christ whipped the Jews out for. Why is reality by nature seemingly contradictory to this ideology at baseline? It's not like the baseline is abundance and availability of resources and vitality, it's the opposite. Why is it that the people who abandon morality attain the most comfortable boxes. When you view reality like that the White Christian based on dual seedline doctrine will never truly be able to live without conflict because of the intrinsic nature of the spirit in seeing all these immoral things, from the perspective of their natural striving when temptation hasn't been firmly planted and accepted. How does all this get reconciled?

I don't know. It's making my head spin. Any time you begin to logically explain LOA it just gets wild and nothing but unanswerable questions come up. That's why I don't see how it works. From the perspective of your personal experience and wanting to experience pleasure and abundance and satisfaction to a degree then LOA can serve you because you'll abandon yourself, literally, in return for the things of the world. This isn't to say that everybody who's self serving in terms of attaining what they need are parasites to others, or that they don't value their kinsmen and such and prefer to keep their culture clean, it's more so that these people would live in a vacuum and will not want to even engage in the kind of study we do here because opening up such questions would break their illusion down of logical security. Perhaps it's suppose to be that way? Staying ignorant results in an easier life because you're simply not even having the contrast come up of certain responsibilities. You're probably going to be more in your body because you're not needing to search for answers to be certain about things, though as someone with defined head with logic channel as my sun earth I almost can't help it because it's part of my composition. I could leave all this study behind and go dive into LOA and even knowing what I know about dual seedline doctrine know that from that perspective I'm still saved because I'm of Israelite descent which means there's no real "downside" other than having to show myself to God as someone who knew differently and still went the way of self serving ideology to benefit my own senses over the senses of providing freely wherever I can to others in meaningful ways and asking the tough questions that nobody else seems to be able to ask.

Practically speaking when applying RS and any of this stuff it's simply about going all the way, and accepting that conditions against your natural striving or things that produce intuitive impulse should be negated as contrasting so that state streaks and unfold without restriction and the effortless life of living without seeming conflict can play out. In essence there's nothing to be lost from serving your own desires in this world on a level of divine responsibility, though dual seedline means you'll still face consequences and not be granted rewards for your faith in this world at the end. You'll never see negative outcomes hit you for being a good Jew slave and accepting that as a fact of life. If you live as someone who hates the Jewish system because it exploits us and only artificially makes resources unavailable for us and others then you'll be an angry bitter frustrated and unsatisfied person because you'll be trying to change things you have zero influence or control over, because it's prophesied to play out this way. Preparing for his coming and waiting patiently and having satisfaction in the faith that you're already saved makes the suffering in the temporary sense in holding to moral responsibility in contrast to Jewish ideology all the more worth while when you think about it from that way. No matter how you slice it the white race who's pure lineage Israelite will not be destroyed. I'll still argue that if the human body is created intrinsically the way it is for the spiritual experience to play out with the LOA idea then the white people are still more of an image of divinity than anyone else. Reflective and transparent skin is by definition more akin to the aetheric substrate as manifest energy than anything else could be. White is the colour of divinity because it reflects all else in it, black absorbs and consumes. Yin. Convergent, parasitic and absorbs for itself. It has no reflective capacity. Light is both, but our experience of "warmth" and love from that heartfelt type experience is more white than black. Black is also able to be viewed as supply of light too though, as Jing, though that's an already condensed form. The Jing being inherited and "capacitive" energy, to black holds and binds and keeps together white or diversion and dispersion and radiance. Emanation is black unfolding as white. Within white is black if we're looking at it principally, though no level of reality experiences pure black because that's simply the principle of innate supply built into God which is available and infinite.

So what's the deal. How do we reconcile these? Do we throw the morality perspective away? Who's the judge? The intrinsic natural striving is based on the ideology you have available to you that the seeds will unfold through. We know that the white race is far more creative within them based on how culture has developed and how we've built all the great architectural and artistic works and invented all the tech we use today while nobody else has been able to create anything even close in Africa or Asia. The Asians are closer but they're still devoid of connection to Christ, they don't have the spirit. Why wouldn't it be true that way? In their own vacuum they don't create anything new, only mix and corrupt what's already there. The Hindu culture encourages culture mixing, as my client who told me about that said some time ago. It seems that different racial characteristics have intrinsic natures that are different, different cultural contexts. Is this only this way to enable diversity for God to experience from the LOA view or what, because diversity is conflicting with the biological nature of how the bodies we are born into experience. SO again there's a conflict built into this and the Jewish ideology has produced massive amounts of propaganda to get us to believe that race mixing is ok. NG would support that fully, when before people were always racist and separate with their own people and the people grew together in unity as one people, though scarcity of resources always made conflicts even within the same culture inevitable, but less prominent.

Culture conflicts is built into reality no matter how you view it, especially in the age we live in today. In that case why would God want that from the LOA view? Why would God hate the body (Esau) in LOA if the body is why it's here in suffering to attain knowledge? Does it hate it under the context of temporary suffering? In that case it's the same as the principle of dual seedline doctrine as I explained before abbot the contradiction others claim refutes the bible that's explained by understanding that we're already saved. Contradictions seem to be a part of what's built into the LOA view of reality, and that contradiction is necessary to balance infinite movement in one direction or the other without contrast. It's the self correcting mechanism to keep cycles playing out instead of being in one ideology forever, almost like it's forcing parasitism into the world just because it causes suffering to be experienced, but for what purpose? Expansion, apparently.

Well I'll simply say that because you exist like this with these limitations on you then it would imply that they're there for a reason. The LOA view says there there for the purposes of enabling the metaphysical view of conscious unconscious interaction to play out, and that the body is the manifestation of anchored and stabilised thematic awareness to your senses. dual seedline doctrine says that limitations exist because we're created for the purpose of living lives here in harmony with the opportunities that the natural abundant world offer us to grow in challenge and serve God who created us through that. We are glorified in his glory, there's no parasitic relationship. I have always questioned though why God would allow sin to exist in the world to the degree it has, and how the serpent was even allowed to cause such chaos. I just don't see a purpose of manifesting suffering for the sake of it, even if it's all just going to be like a distant memory in the end as I've said. From that idea it still connects to the NG perspective of it being a dream, because the end outcome seems to be the same, though we're not God. The binding nature of the unconscious must be explored in the NG interpretation for it to make sense. If it can explain history and the binding of limitations as part of our experience for a cause and explain it all consistently then I can see a case for it, though if not then I will say it's another limited view in explaining the nature of everything.

When you get down to it, if you exist and have natural striving to unfold an experience and you deny that because of a contrasting feeling that may or may not have attached to it a different ideology, then what would be the decision to make that's best? Compromise is only compromise because there's a fixed point of comparison in contrast to a condition you're stopping yourself over. The mind controlling the body, but I found that when I pray to Christ as I know him that desires I had before often fall away and don't feel importance because I know I'm already saved and that it's ok regardless. I drop the charge, because there's no feeling of need. I nourish the circuit in that recognition that salvation is already here for me. It's ok, there's no importance on that and I don't even think about it. Is this not naturally how LOA is done? It's the same process in experience really, just a different method of attaining state stabilisation, state being of course thematic composition. At that point the manifestation model actually doesn't matter because the experience of it is the same for being "saved" by Christ or not. All these stories about being saved by Christ I personally find are silly, because you're already saved. I've always questioned that, though the mechanics of it are more correlated to LOA and RS than the intelligence of God shifting limitations in you intelligently because you accepted him into your heart. He chooses you, not the other way around. You're simply just breaking importance on conditions and thus feel relief. All that stuff about salvation in his name is silly even from the literal perspective. There's no way to explore it without applying the mechanics of RS. You will be doing inner alchemy no matter what because that's how it is for all of us, though making that the importance that you serve, and having those as conditions against the actual experience of breaking conditions will hold you back. Vitality supply and availability is the only thing that holds back natural striving from naturally unfolding anyway.

The theory behind this is mind bending. I cannot reconcile these points in an intelligent manner. I really don't know if you ever can, or even if it's possible to to be honest. The seedline doctrine is one that works on all levels and explains everything coherently as I've fully explores throughout the notebook, with the only contrast being that we're held responsible for our decisions vs LOA which says the responsibility is up to you and how you're moved, which feeds into which spirit you are born into with dual seedline, so they complement each other in ways and in other ways they conflict, such as the purpose of it all and about history. I think it's extremely ignorant of NG to deny all the history we've gone into here and throw it all away as myth. The mechanics of LOA can all be explained under RS, and history and the way the collective trajectory works is explained in seedline doctrine in almost every way that we've explored. There's no major contradictions in doctrine and it reflects how we experience reality. It just works, yet people will still insist that LOA is above it all. You can't prove otherwise because you can't negate thematic principles from reality to test these ideas. If we follow logical thought then RS and seedline doctrine explains everything we can observe and test and prove, while LOA is one based purely on accepting that reality has logical contradictions but that it's ok because we can just experience whatever we want if we desire, and it's a total passing off of any "weight" and responsibility to be as light as possible in your life, IF you apply it according to how it actually works which RS explains. The allure of LOA is because it takes off the intrinsic weight that's built into having your doctrine based on how reality is by nature immoral and against your abundance in the sense of attaining satisfaction in the world without conflict. It comes down to do you accept the weight or not. When we negate and dissolve it all down, it's truly about accepting the weight of responsibility that may or may not be there objectively or dissolving that responsibility and just moving through natural striving without conditions against it from a morality perspective when we contrast that against the Jewish system of degeneracy. LOA buffs basically are ignorant of this willingly because navigating reality with that assumption results in the experience I'm having and this view of conflict over ideologies. They don't want that because it doesn't feel good and "light" and free without weight, they prefer to drop the weight so to say and move freely and not judge themselves.

Seeing everything as just "energy" or thematic functions taking form without importance and distancing the conscious mind from having stake is how one freely flows without contrast getting in the way. Purifying trash on the spot and allowing yourself to drop importance on it and allow yourself to move through the experience is how this works. In essence that supports the LOA view more than the seedline prayer view does, mechanically speaking. We know it's about dropping importance because that's signalling vitality supply to manifest the experience in the way it does, and yet at the same time there's tons of experiences we have that show up in our lives without us having importance on them that throw us way out of balance which we have no control over, for example getting flooded. Thousands lost homes here recently, I doubt all of them had fearful minds. They all lost their stuff, but some perhaps ended up getting insurance claims or support or whatever else after the fact that the suffering was temporary and it ended up better for them in the end. Temporary suffering seems to be a common thread I find in both LOA and seedline doctrine. We don't actually suffer in the end, even if in the moment it seems like that. Both sides work in that respect, and if you're filled with vitality then it'll work out for you because you're a supply for abundance. Mechanically speaking LOA works more if we ignore the contradictions, because prayer from seedline will always work anyway if the mechanics are present. Does God literally hear prayers an answer them with eyes seeing our circumstances and decides to grant us what we desire or not? Yes. That's in scripture as we've proven, God will give us what we want for better or worse, though the elect will be chosen to play roles which may involve more conflict than others, those who keep his commandments. Which way works better practically? LOA does. Which one makes more sense if we're discussing theory? seedline does. In that case does doctrine matter more than practical? Most often no it wouldn't matter really if the application is sound. If the theory doesn't matter then it's not a weight or a condition against natural striving, though under seedline doctrine and the righteous ideology your desires will be transformed anyway so under both you can live naturally, so long as under seedline you don't run up against the system too much and see Jewish influence. Seeing it as just necessary for reality to play out or as something to compete with then makes the difference because if there's something to compete with then it's going to mean you're placing importance on the Jewish system and having weight you're carrying, I'd assume. It feels like that to me sometimes, though not always. Under seedline doctrine you'd need to accept that these things are there as it all supports and connects the ideology and cosmology of reality in a logical sense (unless that's part o the LOA trap built into the program to keep the "natural" men in their minds and away from truth and I've gone all the way through it and decoded it and see it as just part of the program) but then depending on how you view Jewish influence in the world you'll need to drop importance on it or deny it and leave it behind as I did for a period of time when I did manifest more physical abundance then I ever have before because I wasn't involved in answering these seemingly unanswerable questions. In that case then you'd have to consider why Christ literally was in conflict with the system and sees importance on it to destroy it when he comes back. If Christ whipped Jews out of the temple then why wouldn't we in being moved by the spirit feel righteous hatred for evil and want to eradicate it from our reality? Is that the trap of seeing the physical and ignoring the state stuff that LOA talks about as placing weight on things that don't need weight on them? If God who is perfect despises evil in the world and calls impure breeds of humans dogs and tells them he's not come to save them then wouldn't that reflect in our attitude when approaching it from that same spirit of discernment?

Metaphysical view sees all these impure Jews and hybrids as worldly conditions against natural striving and Christ destroys or whips them and such out of the temple, body. I'd guess that's how you'd interpret it. It makes sense on that level. I feel that I must fully explore the metaphysical doctrine systematically and gain the lens to view the bible that way to contrast it to the seedline doctrine which we can logically demonstrate and effectively prove on all levels outside of LOA. I've explored seedline doctrine sufficiently to recognise how to interpret the bible in that way and I can 100% prove it to be the truth about how the bible relates to history considering that the manifest world is literally unfolding according to scriptures so there's no doubt in my mind that if we're looking to have faith it would be in this doctrine as it's provable, but as I said perhaps that's part of the program and I've been one of the few it seems who's fully gone down to the bottom of that and seen it all the way through and ended up concluding that the application of RS is simply a logical manner to explain and describe the invisible metaphysics of LOA and that the contradicting nature of LOA is simply how things are and that you can't prove it logically because it's actually outside that, even though you can't really prove it either way. Practical LOA is doing RS and RS explains the seedline doctrine and everything else we've studied so as I said making sense of reality cannot be done with LOA, unless I'm ignorant of something else.

As far as I'm concerned RS and all these studies are complete and at this point I simply need to systematically explore LOA theory and either finally destroy it for good as a contradicting doctrine that's just a new cult like system that self gaslights you to suck people into avoiding the cold hard facts about Christ coming in the flesh or that these will somehow compliment in the end, or that LOA will come out on top and say that all the logical stuff is simply part of the manifest program and that the contradicting nature is just to be accepted as a necessary part of doctrine that doesn't need explaining and that trying to explain it is the trap that keeps you stuck. No matter how it turns out though RS as it's been outlined is 100% solid and applicable in how we experience reality and I've proven the phenomena of LOA and the history of reality and everything else around it with the gradual shift in culture and the Jewish ideologies in subverting seedline doctrine and all this other stuff. That's all explored now so what more is there to do other than dive into the individual parts? Not really. It's already done. All of Israel is already saved. Just live according to your ideology that serves righteousness. Follow the spirit. It's already there.

It's like if LOA in the bible is correct then the seedline doctrine and the manifestation of the Jewish system and everything it proves and reflects is a big trap. What a joke.

Interesting question.

How come the random native tribes in the middle of nowhere who've never seen a lightbulb don't manifest technologies that we have today? Is it because they don't have awareness of that within their tribes? What then determines how they'd come into contact with such tech? How do they advance at all? How does any new ideas formulate if there's not a fixed influence driving this all and for specific groups of people. It's like this force of technological and parasitic cultural development driven by Jewish investment is the fixed function in the world, and that re-creating that would involve you basically totally disappearing from it to "un-create" it, somehow. That never made sense to me, because if I am to actually un-create that then that would mean I'm influencing the reality of everybody else, but the personal reality bubble idea doesn't work either. It's just so whacked and self contradicting.

Feels like I've gained some clarity. Even though I've not found a definitive solution that's 100% correct on every level it's more aligned than ever, by a lot. We can make sense of all this historical stuff in context and in a way that's wholistic on every level. The historical data that I've gone over during this time exists for a function it seems. The LOA interpretation says there are no facts, which means there is no absolutes except God, which means that finding absolutes is searching for the invisible needle in the haystack. I've gone through that search and found proof of God in the haystack, though it's a heavy proof and contains burden. Is that the ultimate truth? I find that a vast majority of so called Christians aren't even close to carrying the full burden of following the law on their shoulders, and accepting the doctrine. The thing that really lifted me up was KNOWING that no matter what, I'm already saved. Always saved through lineage. That relief that I felt when I accepted that opened me up it seemed. No longer was it of massive importance, I went through my own purification process I believe. It feels like it. The amount of pressure I felt just a few days ago was unbelievable. I was boiling from the inside out, and I almost exploded with pressure it was insane. All I can do is go through it and allow it. Then I recognised what it was revealing. All these things that were importance held back nourishment, and thus natural striving.

If people would manifest dragons it's because they're available in the program. It seems that availability of collective thematic functions cycles in and out and that's making what's available for us to experience. The shifting of the zodiac we could say, down to the gates of the I'ching. The contradicting nature seems to be what enables opportunity, I don't want to say possibility because that's really not it because availability opens up possibility and if availability in the seeds isn't present then that's not going to play out because it's not for you, just like how we can't have dragons flying around in the sky. Dragons in the old days were Jews. That's why the idea of dragons hoarding pots of gold showed up in some art and literature. Once again we see reference to Jewish ideas playing out. Just think, if you're born a Jew and have the consciousness of a tare then that's simply who you are and that cannot be changed. Our lives are as they are, and natural striving comes through the body, form the Holy Spirit, and we can't avoid that movement because it's what's unfolding through us that's available for not just us but also the collective experience which we navigate through. The autonomic nervous system functions are built into that seed, all you can do is observe. You don't control the sun o the moon or your body or the trees growing or any of that because it's unconsciously unfolding, though the things you're suppose to experience because they're thematic sequences that will "purify" unseen and silent knowledge within you to be able to make that insight available for the consciousness to then interpret and naturally express into the world which completes the cycle of outputting whet's inside. This is how the Jewish filth who run the world got into that position of power, because that's their natural striving, they're tares and goats. It's their nature, just like it's our nature to be the sheep.

This is why I see the physical manifestation of the bible as 100% valid in how we view it in seedline doctrine. Israel is already saved, meaning the white race of the world are already determined to be in Christ, and the others such as Jews will play their part in manifesting through their natural striving this tendency to have enmity between us. That's what we observe in culture conflicts that's built into our bodies. We can't prevent that from manifesting on a collective level which it has and will continue to because that's a means by which God uses that enmity to reveal who's who and out of that opportunities open up for both abundance and exploitation. Now that doctrine exists within the greater metaphysical doctrine. The spiritual nature of other races serving other gods throughout history under the context of being polytheistic has in fact manifested, if we look at it outside of the metaphysical lens. That's all come to pass, and you can't just ignore that history as nothing of importance. This reveals to us how the will of God is made manifest in the world. Why are Jewish filth the way they are? Because that's what the manifestation of the will of God necessitated, and his will is beyond our comprehension. Point is that LOA in a vacuum denies this fixed frame of reference, but to us it's all natural anyway. That external stuff isn't "in the way" because natural striving would lead you through it in such a manner where it won't prevent the unfolding of whatever you're suppose to play out, and really it would provide the availability of circumstances to play off your seeds and the thematic composition which would be unique to that time in history specifically just like how I was talking about before with the whole dragons thing. We don't have dragons but the collective landscape is shifting from nationalism to universalism, for better or worse when it comes to our individual cultures. In the end that greater overarching process is part of the will of God because it's prophesied to manifest.

Connecting together these parts in a coherent manner is the challenge but I believe this foundation can explore more. The infinite wisdom and glory of God is fantastic in all his ways, we are moving in his created reality and are being moved by him at the same time based on our spiritual essence. Do all races truly have the same spiritual essence? Well LOA would say yes because they're human but are a diff colour and have different other traits, but the bible seedline doctrine says they're created from impure seed, as in they're created from fornication between angels and flesh beings, thus being born of the flesh and not from above. They still experience the LOA type metaphysics because they're still created in an image of the angels which are like God (let us make man in OUR image) and thus contain the simulacrum but the specific phenotype characteristics in the physical manifestation and their associated creative essence when it comes to cultural progression aren't there the same as we have. We built all the great architecture from the past. I also don't believe that angels gave others like Canaanites or whomever advanced tech or the pyramids were built by aliens or even by slaves, but other more common sense methods. No matter how you view it though, any shift in experience will result in a shift in the associated importance to those thematics that were held back from conditions. Things that we view as something to be avoided will hold the resonant thematics in the seeds that would otherwise naturally unfold in a bind and the condition must be dropped with its importance for the box to drop. Feeling through it and facing the fire as I've discussed opens it up. Dropping importance and sinking charge and going through the experience to the point where you learn through the reality of experience that it's not so much of a big deal after all is game changing.

With all this in mind, to the person with an innate importance on morality that's contrast against their natural striving especially when it comes to Jews in the sense of vitality cultivation should be dropped and allowed to play out. This is the conflict of the morality question, but that comes from a natural striving seedline perspective, and that since the baseline availability of degeneracy is made baseline for all whites now in the world with the current culture it's made sinful degenerate acts easier to make than ever. The availability of such opportunity to make sinful acts morally speaking emanates from the greater program making them variable. If you lived in a small village without any cultural degeneracy and common sense laws were applied you'd not WANT to go and make sinful decisions simply because you couldn't or never even considered those options. Sinful trash like multiculturalism spreads when you've got it available as options to move into. That's the thing about prophesy is that this is also correspondent to the seedline interpretation because Israel moved into and out of apostacy on a cyclic basis, where we had periods of abundance and then periods where we were separated from righteousness and morality in the sense of living natural lives (which would lead to depletion of vitality and thus sinful acts that destroy your connection to spirit because subconscious space is warped) because that's available and normal, hence why the contrast to want to make sinful acts would inherently not really apply in a society like before where that's not even really available. This is my point also about how different collective experiences and availabilities to manifest outcomes opens up. It's the "fornication" of culture that opens up degeneracy in the world to be exploited because of how the biology is wired. I hope this is all making sense.

The physical interpretation of the bible from a seedline perspective is valid and makes sense and we can connect all those dots in clear ways and at the same time the metaphysical level also is containing that physical level within it. Arguably the metaphysical level takes precedent over the seedline level because of the shifting of availability of various dynamic thematics on a collective level. Those open up either techno futuristic "corrupted' type realities or smaller communities with more natural living and greater vitality available, but then there' also a trade-off it would seem. Could we have both a nourishing culture that's nationalistic and coherent and moral combined with a more advanced technological basis that culture lives within, like for example free energy and housing for all and good food for all and having people still work physically and nourish themselves not just for recreation but as a way of live and balance with their environment and society? Would that be possible? Well technically it's existed in the past, when King Edward threw out the Jews England thrived for a while where people were well nourished but there was no advanced tech. Typically we see it play out as good times create weak men who now have the availability to sin without consequence and then bad times come because peoples vitality gets depleted and God is going to judge them for such which means they'll end up repenting and thus turning from their wicked ways. Will there ever be a stable cycle of righteous living and abundance? Well this has never happened for a long time as far as I know and you must wonder why. Is it because prophesy is cyclic in the sense that since God determined the Israelites would turn to him and then they would sin again, is it because of this manifesting as such or would it be because this is just the metaphysical nature of how alchemical cycles of transformation ever unfold and shift over time? Well it's both probably.

LOA is self contradicting because it seems that the contradicting nature opens up opportunity. I don't know any other way of explaining it, and the morality perspective of the bible exists within cycles as the history outlines. In the end in heaven only Israel will exist without degeneracy and Jewish filth corrupting the availability of culture or temptation to sin or deplete vitality. The chosen people are us all because we exist and yet it's also our culture which has been taking center stage. The Jewish culture is not theirs, it's ours, and we've proven that. Judaism isn't a Jewish thing, their history has always been nomadic and they've always faced persecution and been thrown out because they're parasitic. Why did this happen over history if the gen 3:15 prophesy of the enmity between the seeds is an unfounded idea that's not based on anything tangible. The fools who dismiss any history in the bible obviously haven't made these connections and probably aren't able to see it because their views aren't open to that because of how it feels too heavy. I've been through this and negated the heaviness, because I can look at it with clear lens and see it for what it is, and explain the morality perspective and the relative morality perspective in one go as well as the history and metaphysical nature. The RS view of the bible is the most complete, when I've fully systematically explored the metaphyseal interpretation of it that is. I believe I'm the only person on earth to have this connection made, which is just another part of my state and path unfolding here. I'll not really teach this doctrine on mass because it's not suppose to be, because it'll face persecution but to those who are open I will share it to them and it will be available. It's here so.

Question is do we remain separate and rebuke the beasts in the world and the Jews? I'd say no unless you've purified that fully and don't have importance on it and only speak it when opportunities show up. Why? Because you're holding excessive importance on being critical of Jews at that point. Did Christ willingly go to the Canaanite and call her a dog? No. She harassed him and he called her a dog. Did Christ whip anybody else but the Jews in the temple? No. He only whipped them because they defiled a known sacred temple which everybody would agree is a common sense thing to do to rid evil from the common place because it got in his and the Israelites way. He rebuked the Jews in their synagogues but never went out of his way to attack Jews on the street randomly. He always had purpose and he felt anger and got heated naturally when the time came to express such feelings. According to LOA the bible would lead someone to never feeling anger, and to basically live on this floating cloud of effortless living, yet that's never rally been the case. Conflict exists intrinsically and avoiding it is impossible. Pick your battles and always apply the common sense rule. Do not overextend into unnecessary bounds where you're simply attacking someone because they're a beast for no cause other than because you feel importance. Allow your body to do the talking. It will happen when it's required because the current would be there and your expression will be natural as it was with Christ. That's what it really means to be led by the Holy Spirit. You're not really going out of your way to rebuke them, but if opportunity comes to have a righteous testimony then rebuke them on their fables without any importance on it. Simply speak the fact and then move on. Christ never tried to deter anyone from their beliefs, because they didn't have it in them. He allowed them to have their view but still spoke the facts to them because it was the facts and compromising would cause you to hold excess energy unnecessarily. Holding in and avoiding unnecessarily are both bad for your vitality. This is why I always say only express when necessary, allow others to disagree and not have it perturb your center. Speak the truth and move on. Know that you're saved. It's always as RS has been. Spontaneous effortless effort, coming from a place of still and clear waters with a spontaneous sprouting of vitality to express inner truth from the spirit. Those who will disagree will disagree and allow them to have that position. Allow them to have it without you feeling the unnecessary need to try and convince them and be approved of. That's not our goal as Israel.

It seems that from this angle these 2 doctrines can be a =t least mostly reconciled. Even though massive doubt and confusion I still made it to this point, which obviously also points out how along the way feeling doubt and stuff is natural and part of the process of learning. If I didn't feel doubt I'd never learn anything new. Being grounded in this approach and also liberated in opportunity is the difficult balancing act. Most will take one or the other and assume that's all there is. The seedline doctrine exists within the metaphysical doctrine. It doesn't take importance as the only one, but that they feed into each other and it gives discreet objective context to how collective consciousness unfolds in the world for different people in different ways, in a common sense view. I don't know currently how else you could reconcile these different seemingly conflicting ideologies other than how I've done it. Simply saying it's all states of consciousness denies the absolute reference frame and collective trajectory and the fixed nature of thematic composition of the body with the unconscious and conscious mind interacting. LOA denies inner alchemy, it assumes it's all just imaginal or spiritually sensed states of "assumption" on that spiritual sense level. They don't say that but that's really what they're talking about, it's experienced in the body and not in a greater sense, though the spirit leads the body to feel this way and thus the spirit unfolds through the body naturally into the feeling of naturalness of a state where you're lead without contrast barriers and all the RS things we've built out.

I also want to write about the essence of "it's all me as God" and "I'm the only person" because you're not. So when an LOA buff comes up and says that it's not anybody else doing those things to you but that it's all parts of you doing this to yourself, what they really means (without recognising it obviously because they speak effectively delusion) is that the thematic components that are within you are currently disproportionate compared to where you need to be and so this person in their availability of supply to make you into their victim is using you to manifest their outcome, which is all about availability. This is the same thing with the collective outcome and why it's that they are doing this to us and yet at the same time if you see them as important and make them the pedestalised beings who control you and dictate natural striving then yeah they will be doing that to you. It's all about recognising that you're having a valid experience but that it doesn't HAVE to just be this way because frustrating bad cycles are usually because of holding onto importance where it's unnecessary.

I'm actually going to give LOA as we've been taught it a full shot under the RS process of application with gazing and sinking charge and breaking boxes and going all the way and such. Space and nourishment and going all the way is everything in RS. I'm going to drop the state of constant studying for a while and work on testing things I've not gone through you in a systematic manner. Now that I've concluded that both seedline doctrine and the metaphysical LOA type view of the bible can compliment each other pretty well I don't have reason to stay in "study" state and can love for other functions now. This work is pretty much done, though I'm sure I'll be back with new insights.

I'm going to try a method of application based on fractal application of dissolving importance on biological limitations and actually test hardcore revision of aspects of reality that would bind entropic outcomes into experience. Simply speaking I'm going to apply actual age reversal methods purely from an inner alchemy level without using quintessence or anything except simply applying the basics of RS and going all the way with it. Cultivating vitality and allowing it to unfold through me naturally. I've honestly been in study mode for months, like over 6 months without anything else really being in my focus. That's why I've written around 1000 pages since then. Wild stuff. I'm here now that the theory of both ends of this are established at baseline (I'll still study parts but not make it priority in focus) which is pretty consistent without holes that would break the doctrine. It's been very satisfying now that I've explored all this and finally came to conclusions that are sound. The reasoning mind has no need to doubt because it's all correspondent and you're not denying history with the bible or denying Christ in the flesh but are understanding of all aspects that correspond to this doctrine in the world and BEING OK WITH IT! Being ok with it. "Am I ok with this". "Does this really matter?" "Do I need this?" These questions to bring center are very important to the process of sinking charge and allowing the waters to be still and reflective so that a coherent nourishing fire and purify the heart without effort, because that current is available and ready to unfold through the seeds.

Currently I honestly feel pretty mid when it comes to vitality. I went through a LOT of dropping of feelings over the last while with understanding seedline doctrine fully and going all the way with it.

11/4/25

"Seedtime and harvest" is a book I've not read of his yet surprisingly. I wanted to find his reference to biblical proof of this planting seeds idea because everything I understand about how this works says otherwise. Willing to be wrong but I need to see a systematic explanation.

NG says there's 4 parts to consciousness which correspond to the tetragrammaton of YHVH. That's symbolic of the 4 rivers of Eden. The first one is about the producer who "suggest the theme of a play, this he does in the form of a wish". Wish in this sense I believe he's relating to desire, or how desire is innate within us it seems. That's what I've said, the producer is feeding you desire, wishes to experience. Natural striving comes through this part it seems. Interestingly enough NG also calls them themes, which they are as we know.

Then he says that the next one is the author who "writes only the last scene of the play". "The scene must dramatize the wish fulfilled". "When the scene is clearly visualised the authors work is done". That's what he says. So here it seems more like the unfolding of that desire through availability of thematic current with open channels as to then translate the thematic resonant currents in the seed matching what's coming through the correspondent channels in the body and thus translated by the mind as the imaginal experience.

The third is the director. "The dissectors tasks are to see that the actor remains faithful to the script and to rehearse him over and over again until he is natural in the part". This is just like the author but more so then in this case about the conditioning of the body in normalising those currents and having them stabilise that thematic arrangement in the body. "This function may be likened to a controlled and consciously directed attention, an attention focused exclusively on the action that the wish is already realised". I don't see how this statement can be accurate because we know that many many times without any conscious input big and seemingly impossible things can show up.

"The form of the fourth is like the son of God, human imagination. This fourth mighty one performs within himself in imagination the pre-determined action that implies the fulfilment of the wish. This function doesn't visualise or observe the action, this function actually enacts the drama and does it over and over again until it takes on the form of reality. Without the dramatized vision of fulfilled desire the theme remains a mere theme and sleeps forever in the vast chambers of unborn themes. Nor without the cooperative attention obedient to the dramatized vision of fulfilled desire will the vision receive objective reality".

"1st is Jehovah's King who suggests the theme, the 2nd is Jehovah servant who faithfully works out the theme in a dramatic vision, the 3rd is Jehovah man who is attentive and obedient to the vision to the vision of fulfilled desire who brings the wandering imagination back to the script 70x7. The form of the 4th is Jehovah himself, who enacts the dramatized theme on the stage of the mind".

Right so that's from his book. The 1st is the pre-determined theme of experience, which is actually what I've been saying this whole time. I've never heard NG mention is this clearly before anywhere else. Wonderful it's like I'm opening up yet more levels. As if I've not been through enough already. So there's then the servant who I don't have anything to really liken it to in RS terms, other than the conscious recognition of the themes of the seed, so the servant in RS would be like the translation of that niggling desire as sensory imaginal experience to be targeted. I actually like that he said themes that's correct language. I can't fault that. So on top of this the 3rd would be like the body it seems, considering NG said he's "obedient" it makes me think of submissive feminine nature of the unconscious mind where the "impression" is anchored which is really just the seed unfolding through the body as it exists in thematic potential. 3th is the manifest outcome, where the mechanics of reality move everybody naturally through who they're being using the body as the substrate. It seems here that the conscious mind would relate mostly to either the 2nd or the 4th, because God observes and so do we.

I won't quote it because it's massively long but in chapter 4 he talks about the "increasing meaning" of events and what they represent in our reality. He's saying that viewing reality more from the "higher meaning" level is the goal. I agree and this is also partly what gazing does as I've talked about. You begin to literally see through the veil. This reminds me of when I was at my most powerful, because I was able to see through the veil sooooo fast back when I was 15, even more so than today. It seems to me that holding onto conditions that are of excessive importance as to imply that you cannot see through the veil need to be dropped, because this is the wall you run up against. Clearing the channels seems to relate to his idea. This is how I say the practise of RS should actually be done in that the experience of these veils is to be dissolved as a function of nourishing your body with the vital currents we cultivate and circulate. I've argued that keeping the veils here would be for a reason before but yet at the same time the contrasting view seems to be how advanced gazing leads you to experiencing reality. When I was most "pulled out" in consciousness and most effortlessly abundant was during that time when I first started gazing up for about 3 months or so. It was quite interesting what happened. I remember good and bad things happening to how I expected, yet at the same time things happened I didn't think about consciously at all and I also remember that, where certain experiences caught me off guard.

NG also says that the "half time" interval in the bible is the period of sleep. Sleep representing a half time.

I've been through the whole book now and there's no mention of planting seeds. Very disappointed. I've still not found reference to the bible about seed planting. The way that NG describes creation here it seems that the seeds are already there, as "infinite states" which correspond to the degrees of nourishment over various themes of experience that we can inhabit. Inhabiting a state is experiencing the themes of it and having them available to us.

Also NG mentioned being "progressive" in one of his examples in the book which I found interesting. He said something about the US being filled with "progressive intelligent people" under the context of needing to accept someone who wasn't white to be in a burial after he died at war. People back then weren't accepting of anyone who's not white, as we've established, and NG said that progressive (modern views) are for "intelligent people". I don't know why he'd think that current cancer culture is a good thing but whatev.er I believe he's bought into Jewish ideology quite closely.

Here's a copy paste from a post I found on persisting and dropping seeds, which to me is totally contradicting. How do you persist in an assumption without bringing it up which isn't letting tit go and dropping, unless your body is already moving you anyway because the contrast barriers are gone. The formatting here is from the post not mine.

"Drop It & Persist" From Neville's Own Words

Drop It:

“A seed must be let go. I can’t hold in my hand, a seed must fall into the ground and die before it is made alive. You want something big in this world? Your holding on to it, it hasn’t dropped. (That’s why the big things don’t appear – you have a death grip on them.) – – It’s the little things that you don’t care about (that do). All the little insignificant things so you feeling intensely then you drop them because the other things are so big and so important.” – Neville

"I don’t care what it is; when you know what you want, you can make your desire so real, so natural that you will reach a feeling of certainty which no power in the world can stop. When that feeling is yours, drop it. Don’t ask anyone if what you did was right or wrong; you did it and that’s all that is necessary." - Neville (1968)

"In your mind's eye, you feel that they are as you would like them to be and then drop it. The secret is dropping it. "Let me go" is one the last statement in the gospel. "Do not hold me." If you hold on to it then you haven't dropped it. The seed must fall into the ground and die, before it is made alive. If I hold onto it and keep on holding on to it, I haven't dropped it, and it has to be dropped and left alone too. You can't pick it up every morning and see if it has root. I must drop it and leave it alone and the confront the harvest." - Neville

"So, that peculiar seed that I have just planted for a friend or for myself – how long it is going to take, I don’t know, but I must actually believe it. And when I believe it, I drop it. A seed must fall into the ground and rot if it is to be made alive. I cannot hold it in my mind’s eye; if I take it and do not drop it, then it remains just a seed. I must drop it into the earth and let it rot. And when it rots, it means that I have dropped it from my mind. I’ve done it. That’s all I can do. And then, in its own wonderful appointed hour it will ripen." - Neville

"Impress upon your consciousness the fact that you actually heard him and that he told you what you wanted to hear; feel the thrill of having heard. Then drop it completely." - Neville (1942)

Persist:

"Your reasonable mind and outer senses may deny it; but I promise you: if you will persist, you will receive your assumption. Believe me, you are the same God who created and sustains the universe, but are keyed low; so you must be persistent if you would bring about a change." - Neville (1968)

"Claim you are what you want to be. Persist in that assumption. Continue to assume that role until that which you have assumed is reflected in your world." - Neville (1968)

"Prove to yourself that you are God by feeling your desire is now an accomplished fact. Listen to your friends talk about you. Are they rejoicing because of your good fortune, or are they expressing envy? Imagine their words are true. Persist in imagining they are true. Continue to imagine your desire is already an accomplished fact; and when it is objectively realized, proof will be yours." - Neville (1968)

"It is not enough to feel yourself into the state of the answered prayer; you must persist in that state... Only persistency in the assumption of the wish fulfilled can cause those subtle changes in your mind which result in the desired change in your life... When it appears that people other than yourself in your world do not act toward you as you would like, it is not due to reluctance on their part, but a lack of persistence in your assumption of your life already being as you want it to be." - Neville (1953)

"If you find it necessary to recreate the act every day, you are not casting your bread upon the water. You may imagine over and over again, but you are only going to impregnate once." - Neville (1969)

"All things are made by the human imagination. Imagine something that is not now a fact. Persist in your imaginal act, and when it becomes a fact, you have found God. And once you have found him, never let him go!" - Neville

“Your only responsibility is to remain faithful to your imaginal act until you experience it in your outer world. You can repeat your imaginal act each night before falling asleep. In fact, you may wish to enact this drama over and over again until it feels normal and natural to you as you drop off to sleep. Your imagination will work out the means to realize your dream while your conscious mind sleeps.” – Neville

Contradiction Resolved:

"When the feeling of reality is yours, for the moment at least, you are mentally impotent. The desire to repeat the act of prayer is lost, having been replaced by the feeling of accomplishment. You cannot persist in wanting what you already have. If you assume you are what you desire to be to the point of ecstasy, you no longer want it. Your imaginal act is as much a creative act as a physical one wherein man halts, shrinks and is blessed, for as man creates his own likeness, so does your imaginal act transform itself into the likeness of your assumption. If, however, you do not reach the point of satisfaction, repeat the action over and over again until you feel as though you touched it and virtue went out of you." - Neville (1948)

"If you reach the point of relief, your bread has been cast upon the water to return, perhaps in the matter of an hour. I have had the phone ring – minutes after I have imagined it – to hear confirmation that it has happened. Sometimes it has taken days, weeks, or months; but I do not repeat the action once I have done it and felt the feeling of relief, for I know there is nothing more I need to do." - Neville (1969)

So I don't see how that can work by persisting and dropping if dropping implies it's done and persisting implies bringing it up. To me persisting is more or less dropping importance on surrounding contextual conditions which are thematically related. That makes it work. "Do not hold onto me" sounds like the body resisting, because your mind only swims in the unconscious which means the bad feeling of resistance makes you want to grab and hold on, meaning the resistance hasn't actually gotten lost. This is why I say that NG and his SATS method of reaching satisfaction is in itself a purification method and not anything separate or different or whatever else. It's just normalising the sensation of being that in the body. How else can you drop it and naturally persist. His contradiction thing is totally a contradiction because if you're holding onto trash and don't actually reach the point of letting go for good (which is really what the imaginal act should be doing if it's effective) will cause you to dip HARD and manifest opposite results, at least from my experience and the experience of many others I've spoken to.

Based on the logic NG preaches here he's saying persist in imagining until it's satisfied and that you need to stop it but dropping it IS a result of the satisfaction which is what the "impotence " is, so you can't actually drop a seed until persistence is "completed' we could say and the satisfaction is attained, going through to the end or going all the way is persisting and dropping the seed is effectively what satisfaction is, because then you'll not WANT to dig it up because it's not important anymore. I don't understand why people still don't get it. The only thing to do is nourish the body so that the satisfaction can be reached naturally and then it's done, you've let go. All we can do is let go of trash because the seed is already there and often always unfolding through us all the time. Usually this will involve making tough decisions but when you do it then it's done. It's satisfied. The importance and stuff is gone because you went through it. It's only important because it's basically nagging you to pay attention and go through it. How else does importance get felt?

Listen very very carefully.

Dropping the trash through the inner alchemy I've explained over and over IS what "dropping the seed" and reaching satisfaction is. They're THE SAME THING! Persisting is running up against the resistive trash with nourishing current that the body responds to favourably and in that place you can purify the trash and thus transform the state into satisfaction where it's truly done, because when the trash is burned out and gone for good then there's naturalness of being that person in the body. You won't be able to help but be different, because it's who you now are because the trash is gone. The importance of that trash is gone. You have no contrast to get in the way of natural striving, and thus the vision you have MUST be realised. The moment of realisation that you can be who you actually desire to be is the moment of "impression" or dropping the seed or any of that stuff. That is when it's satisfied because the body is nourished. I've gone over this over and over and over and over and that's literally the only way it works. When I hear success stories and what they did to attain the outcome it was coming from a place of accepting who they are, the acceptance of the seed is clearing the channels for those themes of experience to flow through you and because that's nourishing to your body and it feels comfortable you will feel satisfied like it's done, because what's there in supply that your body needed is now fulfilled. What more is there than that? That's ALL there is to manifestation and Reality Synthesis.

You cannot drop the seed consciously without the body letting go. The body lets go and drops the seed. The body feels satisfied. The body believes. The body is the key ingredient to manifesting because unless the body feels comfortable then you're screwed and you'll forever be persisting and peaking and dipping until the trash is gone. Feeling it for nothing in a vacuum isn't going to often break boxes, though in some cases it can. What you really should do is bring up all the trash that you're holding onto, go to your pathway notebook and remind yourself of all the thins that bring you pain and how important these things are to hold onto that they're bound by as the conditions and then go through the hardcore pathway revision in "what if this was never an issue" and "what if this was never important". That is THE most powerful "technique" ever in my opinion in impacting serious changes. If you actually do this then you WILL purify your trash for good and allow the body to be itself and the seeds to unfold through it where you can just observe and watch the movie. All this constant positive thinking will SCREW YOU UP BIG TIME!

When I manifested that SP overnight that tie it was because I did exactly this without realising it. I had immense vitality supply and because I felt so frustrated and almost raging at myself for being such a loser that I just said "screw this I'm done" which is basically me saying "This isn't important anymore I'm over this" and she showed up THE NEXT MORNING! I couldn't believe it when I saw it. I felt ANGRY and yet here was a positive outcome. THIS PROVES THAT YOU DON'T NEED TO FEEL BLISSED OUT TO MANIFEST SPECIFIC THINGS UNLIKE WHAT NG PREACHES OUT OF IGNORANCE! That's the fact. Dropping trash through running nourishing current up against it when targeting conditions IS dropping the seed because the seed is always unfolding and yet you're unable to clear the pathways that it's coming through. NG is correct in thecase of "working yourself up" becauseoften when you're bringing up resistance you'll feel the bad feelings and the fire will rise (which is what we acually want if we're transforming them) in which case the importance of them when brought under the context of what is can be released. Releasing negative feelings has everything to do with your willingness to actually just drop them but you need to bring up that context as I've written about over and over especially early on in my writings. Contextual sense when applied to the resistance through nourishing current WILL purify it. Just sitting with the trash feelings in a vacuum CAN release them but in my opinion you should be doing it the way I just said because it's alchemically based, unlike what NG preaches about feeling blissed out. You cannot feel blissed out if you're filled with important conditions against allowing yourself to feel blissed out. He has no idea.

I can't disprove everything he says but his practical basis for SATS is totally backwards and contradictory and I just proved that in his writings. He never understood how it works, and he's always assuming that you're going to have the correct contextual basis brought up by default to purify it with the positive stuff. The contrast needs to be felt for it to work. SATS without much emotional charge is also fine, and often that will be because you're not holding into trash. You're already clear, and any positive feelings will come as a result of the scene. The positive feelings in contrast to the trash will come naturally when the contextual basis is established, It will come out of your body and through your conscious mind IF the vitality to actually clear that is available to do so, which for most people is but they're not applying it correctly of course.

Doing what I just said will transform everything for you. That's THE techniqie. Facing the fire under correct context. Bring up the trash with pathway work in the conditions that are important you've identified which amke you feel that "heavy weighted down" type feeling and then run those up against the direction of inner truth and natural striving and accept that these old conditions aren't important anymore. Drop that trash and you'll cleaer the pathways by which the seed that's ALWAYS THERE can unfold through you like magic. NG never preached any effective model, else he's be saying what I'm saying. His method is unreliable because it's assuming you know what to do with bad feelings. He's also assuming that everybody is well nourished which they're obviously not especially today. NG never spoke about the body to any degree that matters under the context of how conditioning works and basically ignored it as any important factor in inner alchemy He assumed that the body was just subservient to all conscious imaginal work and there's no more to it. This is objectively incorrect. Feeling good unnecessarily will destory you because you're going to be depleting yourself by doing that without running it up against the contrast. The feelings are there and you're not transforming them. NG taught a method that is self contradicting and doesn't work for most people and his interpretation of the bible, if correct, should reveal these facts as the alchemist has made known to me.

I will reveal these things on video in the coming days. I'm done hearing this trash about people telling you that "it's done" in a vacuum of positive feeling because that rarely ever results in positive transformation.

By imagining more you're only going to make the thematic resonance in the body more focused, and in doing so if you continue to fail to be moved with it then that energy will basically backfire and cause OPPOSITE results in the world. If you're hyping yourself up and yet still compromising you WILL suffer because the body WANTS to move through the experience and you'll get the intuitive impulses ALL the time to do so and yet you'll compromise because you're afraid. "Persisting" really is simply about going all the way through pressure, and it's got nothing to do with what NG says. The whole persistence idea from a mental level is UTTER TRASH that's going to get you in deep trouble. Seriously I can't believe NG could write this stuff and talk about it and have such a cult following and people claim "You don't know anything about NG". What a load of trash NG hasn't offered any reliable methods and tells you to "don't lift a finger to make it happen" and all that's doing is IGNORING intuitive impulse through the body. The "Feeling" of that intuitive sense of "I KNOW this is my correct movement" and you compromise is going to cause stagnating in the movement of current through your circuits and the only thing that can come from that is BAD BAD BAD things. Vitality amplifies intuitive impulse AND allows you to process more trash at the same time too. Gazing opens this up where you'll feel more with less. Efficiency of stimulus is everything. Fasting from the world amplifies this feeling/intuitive sense too. Unless you listen to that movement and go all the way then you're screwed plain and simple. You'll not manifest the end if you're unable to drop the importance on the conditions against the natural striving and just go through the movement/. There's no magic ingredients to what NG says, if what he says works it's because your body was already comfortable and didn't need any purification of contrast barriers. It's all there. I literally just explained everything about LOA in practical terms That's Reality Synthesis and it's here to stay.

Reality Synthesis is here to replace the law of assumption because the law of assumption obviously doesn't work else it wouldn't be a multi billion dollar industry. It keeps people coming back to feel better and live in their heads while ignoring their bodies. These morons at the top like Joe Dispenza and trash keep peddling mind magic and trash and somehow still haven't figured out the mind body connection yet and think it's all about single transcendental experiences instead of actually just living life as yourself and going through the pressure in a natural way the way a vast majority of people actually manifest anything of abundance. I'm so done with seeing this trash I swear. Nobody else seems to have figured this out so I'm going to ruin LOA with my BARE HANDS! I swear. You know what. I'm going to put up vids every 3 days or so destroying NG and his mind magic model and blow up. I've get all the answers right here and it's all free so nobody can say otherwise. It's done. I'm done. All this work I've done has been building up to this point.

The truth about the bible will be revealed too.

Who needs more entries here I've done more than enough work building out the theory. No compromise. Mercilessly and ruthlessly go all the way until it's done. It's already done because it's within me, I just have to go all the way through it. That's it.

13/4/25

I'm going to clearly outline LOA in the next page. Think of it like a mini course.

Notebook 19: https://realitysynthesis.com/pages/aetheraeon-notebook-19

Item added to your cart

Aetheraeon Notebook 18

Aetheraeon Notebook 18

Drop It:

Persist:

Contradiction Resolved:

Country/region