Aetheraeon Notebook 27

I will also study other sources and test for accuracy as well. We will go over other references mentioned here that could be second hand and understand if there’s a likely political agenda at play.

I will briefly mention that the quotes from Germania such as “They worship Mercury above all others” are even to scholars considered these quotes to not be very authentic to their actual culture, interestingly. It’s said this is simply a Roman interpretation of other gods and that Tacitus is likely relying on soldiers observations and not actual ceremonies or texts that mention this.

Here's an interesting one I found in a discussion on some random forum. These are all quotes relating to the forgery of Josephus, which I addressed above and explained before. I agree that PART of his writings about Jesus are fake, but he's still mentioned.

"For these reasons every honest Christian scholar has abandoned it as an interpolation. Dean Milman says: "It is interpolated with many additional clauses." Dean Farrar, writing in the Encyclopaedia Britannica, says: "That Josephus wrote the whole passage as it now stands no sane critic can believe." Bishop Warburton denounced it as "a rank forgery and a very stupid one, too." Chambers' Encyclopaedia says: "The famous passage of Josephus is generally conceded to be an interpolation.""

If you take ALL the sources, as in that there were about 20 different authors who wrote during the 1st century AD but only 3 of them mention Jesus's miracles, Paul mentions Jesus being killed many times though, he blames "the Jews" for it. but everyone is all grasping at the miracles stuff and so since none mention the miracles in any credible detail does this mean they didn't happen? No, and if you want to be objective about it then it's also very likely that they didn't play out like the scriptures say physically, which is also why I say that interpreting scripture is difficult because some of it IS in fact allegory hidden in plain sight, and others are not, which we went over yesterday with the various links throughout history to various figures. 56 of them are mentioned by name across history, and there's likely more I will reveal in the "Moses in the hieroglyphs" book when it gets here, at least 4 more I believe. The only other way to explain this is that those mentions are copy paste allegorical alchemical parts of scripture in native languages at those times.

I've recognized the scope of this study is going way broader than expected it to. I don't have time for this, but the conclusions which have been reached thus far is this. There's SOME evidence of seeming pagan practices in the north during the time of at least 4th century BC to 1st century AD. The outliers which deny this don't hold as much weight. Pre first century there's mostly second hand data on this and some archaeological finds with next to nothing written. Taking the words of Paul as they are to say the lost sheep were not pagan as is seen here is a big contrast. The bible doctrine no matter how you view it has 2 classes of people, those who are destined for glory and those who aren't. That's what I can say and bet my life on. Ancestry is a big theme, and the importance of lineage, seedline, alchemy you could say could represent this in the sense of substances transforming into each other, simulacrums processing, in other words. Thing is that the references to the more modern figures must be explained as well, such as the Greek names I referenced in the last page. From my study about the dating of the earliest scriptural manuscripts of the NT is that they go back to between 100-150AD, meaning that the written scriptures that are mostly of the gospels and Paul's writings were penned FAR after those events might've happened. They're all found in Egypt of all places interestingly too. Thing is this doesn't explain why Christians were written about by other sources, which we also went over earlier too. These are the dates of what we have physically available and dated, though inferred dating is based on other data that's coming from sources in the 1st century,

P52 (papyrus 52) is dated to around 125-150AD though some date it back to 1st century. It's of the gospel of John, chapter 18:31-33 and 37-38. Interesting quotes.
P105 dates to 100-150AD and is of the gospel of Matthew 12:34-37, 43, and 45.
P90 is found to be dated around 125-150AD again. This one is about the gospel of John again, 18:36 as well as 19:7.
P66 is dated later from 150-200AD. It's a nearly complete gospel of John.
P46 is dated to 175-225AD and has 1st and 2nd Timothy in it.
P75 is dated to 175-225AC which contains the full gospels of John and Luke.
P45 dates from 200-250AD and has portions of each gospel as well as acts.

We need to keep in mind here also that all of the NT manuscripts are written in conventional book format with text on both back and front of the page, not like the scrolls of the OT. That's why you hear about "the dead sea scrolls", because they're scrolls written on one side. The NT was written in conventional form. Most so called scholars also will say that the book of Galatians for example was written around 50AD or even a little earlier and the main reason is surrounding written records from the time. The papyrus itself comes from far later in the 2nd century so physically that's what is available but for example what I wrote about in the last notebook entry where Nero was persecuting Christians in the writings of Tacitus which is dated to early 2nd century generally around or before the physical manuscripts are dated, so that in itself is pretty clear that the manuscripts existed before these writings from Tacitus. Remember, the writings on the manuscripts were found in Egypt, there's been very little found in the local region to be dated to that time period either.

I'll quote Tacitus again in an extensive form here. This is in Annals (war stories) chapter 15 "But all human efforts, all the lavish gifts of the emperor, and the populations of the gods, did not banish the sinister belief that the fire (THE GREAT FIRE OF ROME) was the result of an order. Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on the class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilate; and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judea... but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their center and become popular". Here he mentioned Christus, and Christians directly. Also keep in mind that Christianity isn't even really an established religion yet, though one could argue that this thread was being hijacked by an upcoming church at the time. Clement of Rome wrote around 90AD. Keep in mind that the great fire of Rome was also dated to have happened in 64AD, which was about 30 years after the kinsman redeemer is said to have been crucified. What I question still is how such a fire could've spread like it did through Rome. Here's another quote just after the one from above. "Accordingly, an arrest was first made of all who pleaded guilty; then, upon their information, an immense multitude was convicted, not so much of the crime of firing the city, as of hatred against mankind. Mockery of every sort was added to their deaths. Covered with the skins of beasts, they were torn by dogs and perished, or were nailed to crosses, or were doomed to the flames and burnt, to serve as a nightly illumination, when daylight had expired.". This to me indicates there must've been "immense multitudes" of Christians, and yet shouldn't it have been at this point that the following was still growing in 64AD? We also have a bunch of "church fathers" writings too, which date from between 50AD up to about 130AD. These are writings from Didache, aforementioned Clement of Rome, Ignatius, Polycarp, Barnabas, Papias, Hermas and also 2nd Clement. These writings often reference the NT texts and the OT especially. The references to the NT are mostly found in Polycarp, which are dated to be around 110-135AD, around or before the first datings of the earliest known physical manuscripts. This is why anyone making a case based on the physical manuscripts is missing points that are important. That's an ignorant position to take. Three's basically proof here of Christianity as an organized system (not official in Rome yet and still undergrounds) shown to be around the late 1st century, which once again is before the physical papyrus is dated.

Some will argue that because Paul doesn't quote a word Jesus said that it's all fake, or that there's no surrounding evidence of the miracles happening being noted down, for example the earthquake or the sky darkening. Some say that these events were taken from earlier records of notings where the sky darkened and moved forward into the gospels to dress up the story, but I still doubt that. It's on the table though. Paul didn't directly quote the parables of Christ, or quote him though, as far as I know. Thing is he quotes the OT a lot, which I've gone over extensively and connected to scriptures and prophesies from that text but he never actually really directly quotes them 1-1 either but they're very clearly implied. There is a passage in 1 Corinthians 11:23-25 about the supper where Paul says "For I received from the LORD that which I also delivered to you, That the LORD Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took bread" and "And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me" and "After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me" which then overlaps with the words of Christ here from Luke 22:19-20 "And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me" and "Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you." It's a pretty clear reference if you ask me. There's not really any indication this was referencing an OT verse. I've searched on e-sword and can't find any reference to taking bread or anything like that relating to this supper. Most of the references to the word "received" come from the NT writings, not the OT. References to received in the OT are mostly under the context of inheritance, be it familial or blessings in other ways, which alchemically could be seen as opening up new capacities and states. I don't see how critics arguments hold up here about how Paul never quoted any scriptures from the gospels or Christ. We should keep in mind that the original Christian doctrine was very likely oral for a while. It's still an interesting point of contrast, but this being a slam dunk against the validity of these scriptures is dumb if you ask me. Thing is Paul does in fact mention Peter, John and James, which some apostolic traditions about Joseph of Arimathea said went with him up to Britain. I will also make pretty clear here about something of real importance relating to people who claim that this point about Christ not being quoted directly 1:1 aside from the example above is that his letters WERE TO THOSE WHO ONLY HAD THE OLD TESTAMENT TO REMIND THEM OF THEIR HERITAGE. That's a theme that NONE of these critics get right, because IT WAS A REMINDER OF BLOOD BONDS TO THE TRADITIONS THEY WERE FOLLOWING AT THE TIME. The "gentiles" were lost sheep who orally still carried the OT traditions despite not having priests, which I've explained many times and is the BIGGEST reason why I question this whole "barbarian pagan" perspective on the lights up north. It doesn't make sense from a physical biblical interpretation doctrine on either end of the spectrum. They can't explain this one, because they likely don't even consider this because they still believe the universalism doctrine and don't understand that the gentiles he preaches to are his own ethnos, which is what gentile translates to in the Latin meaning of the same genetics, AKA OTHER ISRAELITES WHO ORALLY HAD THE OT. FOOLS. Can't they get that. So once again, it's pretty dumb to claim that all the Pauline epistles were forged by the church and such to control people which some seem to claim. Just because Paul doesn't mention the direct quotes of Christ means nothing when you grasp what the function of the epistles was in reality. This point also doesn't "validate" it either but it's an important distinction to contextually frame criticism. The people who he ministered to in the NT didn't have any awareness of Christ's coming and wouldn't have understood quotes if he said them. How does this make any sense? That's just so dumb to say proves it wrong.

Another criticism of Paul is that all of his experience of Christ was through visions and not written word. He does quote 3 of the apostles as I mentioned before, so I would say that this points to the reality that there's more to that point. What I will say is a very interesting question is this from critics. They claim that since Paul himself states that he was a persecutor of the early Christians and thus didn't live during the time of Jesus's ministry. Here's a quote. Act 7:58 "And cast him out of the city, and stoned him: and the witnesses laid down their clothes at a young man's feet, whose name was Saul". Saul here is Paul before he became Paul, stoning a young man named Stephen who confessed the name of Jesus. Also this quote is telling coming from the 1st chapter of acts 8 titled "Saul ravages the church". Act 8:1 "And Saul was consenting unto his death. And at that time there was a great persecution against the church which was at Jerusalem; and they were all scattered abroad throughout the regions of Judaea and Samaria, except the apostles". What date did this take place? Who knows, but it must've been after Jesus's death I'd guess, though I can't say how long. Tacitus does write about Christians being persecuted for the great fire of Rome which was 64AD, and Christ is said to have been crucified in 33AD, so Paul was likely speaking about experiences in this time. Thing is that it's said that Galatians is implied by surrounding contextual data to be around 50AD, so if Paul converted between 33AD (likely after that) and before 50AD (assuming) then it's likely he had 15 years or so to begin his own writings and ministry. If the fire of Rome was 64AD and Christians were persecuted according to Tacitus writing in 110AD roughly, then it's mid 1st century that all this took place. Also keep in mind that the writings from Paul which reference meeting Peter and James and John come from the 1st chapter of Galatians, which is said to be the first written from Paul. This implies that this is why scholars date Galatians to be the first written (which would be pretty common sense I'd guess) and Gala ions is said to be written around 50AD, or some say 48AD. Either way those other apostles must also have been around then and shared with Paul quotes from Jesus I'd also guess. The biggest criticism of this story is that Paul doesn't mention the miracles of Jesus. You'd think if the Church made it up they'd make it more obvious that Paul would gloat about the messages of these miracles and reference them for propaganda though. Right? That's the agenda, control, to dazzle people with this marvelous story, though when you frame it all under the context of seedline doctrine, it makes far more sense, that he's preaching to the lost sheep about their lost identity which is why I'm saying that the ancestral side of scripture MATTERS to understand because it clears up most of these seeming holes. He's not preaching the doctrine the critics want him to be preaching and they think that invalidates it because THEY don't get scripture. Basically they are critical of the epistles because he doesn't mention the works of Jesus or quotes him, which once again if these are made up to control people by the church then you'd think they'd add that in, like they probably added into Josephus saying that he performed miracles and such. The scriptures themselves from Paul don't say these things. The critics will say that the miracles make Christianity what it is, but I will argue that's a childish take on the message of the bible, the core message is remembering who you are, ancestral power is the core theme, which is also why the genealogies are written all over the place and made important. What don't THEY get? Those are conflated arguing points based on an already refuted doctrine. You can't dismiss these points of Paul not mentioning Jesus much directly because that's really not the point of his writings, and those who follow universalism and this fantastical ideology of scripture fail to grasp and make it out to be a childish dazzling story to wow people with the miracles. I personally believe that the miracles very much COULD'VE been allegorical, but that doesn't take away from the message of the epistles, or explain why he wrote them to where he did. Put this into perspective with everything else mentioned here.

I also believe that since Paul never mentioned the earliest "church fathers" which I listed above it's likely that he didn't follow what they taught. It's very likely that these seeming church fathers had an agenda, the earliest ones at least. Him not mentioning them isn't points off the validity of it. The ENTIRE point of the epistles was to REMIND THE LOST SHEEP OF WHO THEY WERE! THAT'S THE CORE DOCTRINE AND IT'S SO PAINFULLY OBVIOUS. They'll never question that context though. Even if Paul mentioned and quoted Jesus's miracles, once again assuming they happened, which I can't prove outside of scripture, what would that change? They'd still find critical talking points. So what. It's a mute point. He also never mentioned Mark Luke John (the Baptist not the other John who wrote the epistles) or Matthew, and this is yet more marks against him, no pun intended. It's pretty clear that these points don't validate anything even if he did. Like what are they looking for? What do they want to prove this was a thing? The only evidence that would really prove this is external sources other than the bible, which we have and I quoted above. There's another quote I didn't mention too, I don't think I quoted Suetonius yet either, who wrote in 110AD. We should take this with a grain of salt too, just like the other authors, since they weren't writing from first hand accounts, but the second hand info is pretty clear if you ask me especially about what Tacitus said how Nero was persecuting Christians and blaming them for the fire of Rome in the mid 1st century. Suetonis quotes in the life of Claudius "He expelled from Rome the Jews who were constantly rioting at the instigation of the Chrestus". Pliny the younger wrote in 112AD in "letters" chapter 10, "They were accustomed to meet on a fixed day before the dawn and sing responsively a hymn to Christ as to a god...". There's also Lucian of Samosata who wrote in 165AD (to be taken with a big grain of salt) "The Christians.. worship a man to this day-the distinguished personage who introduced their novel rites, and was crucified on that account". Sounds like he's making fun of them, like other examples seem to have that tone to them too. Of course these are sources that wrote many decades later but Tacitus for example references the great fire and Nero which happened much earlier. The writings don't often venerate Christians either, which the seemingly forged passage in Josephus indicates.

I've heard another argument about how the miracles or any great events of Christ were commemorated on any coins in the 1st century and this somehow proves it never happened. Well, simply put, why would the Roman authorities want to commemorate the death of Jesus if that would only validate the story and lead them to lose influence with their at the time polytheistic system worshipping the Olympian gods? Right? The church didn't come into power until centuries later, so how does this prove anything just because there's no coins exploring the testimony of Christ? I'm telling you, I'm going over many of the critiques that critics say, including some who I have gathered data from in the past that IS accurate. With that being said though, it's estimated that there are actually thousands of unique coins that were minted over the 1st century though, but surprisingly none were of the events of the bible during those years, That is a good point, but once again, why mint coins of rebels to the Romans? They maybe could've minted coins celebrating the deaths of Christians but would have been proof of Jesus? Unless coins specifically of these events that are considered miraculous were minted then the hard evidence wouldn't line up so it's kind of a mute point but it's got some merit. Coins were often used a state propaganda, to boast of their own achievements, like in Egypt, so commemorating the miracles of Christ would only do harm to their people. There were in fact coins minted in Judea dated to between 29-31AD which were small bronze coins which some claim are proof of Pilate being around then, but they only say "of Tiberius Caesar" which could've been anyone, though it's said that Pilate was in office serving Tiberius during those years so it's inferred. We know that Tacitus actually quoted Pilate being around during those years though, so once again it's external sources referencing this data. There's also Josephus who references Pilate in antiquities of the Jews/Judeans where he quotes "Now Pilate, who was sent as a procurator into Judea by Tiberius, made an attempt to bring in water by means of an aqueduct... and used the sacred treasure. The Jews did not take his actions well..". This is a pretty clear quote of Pilate being around as a physical person which has ZERO reference to Jesus or any apologetic terms to the Christians. Tacitus also is one who isn't apologetic to Christians either, so once again if the church was forging these examples to serve their agenda then it's not having the intended effect since it's speaking bad against the Christians as troublemakers. There's also the references that Josephus said about Jesus being crucified on the cross but even if you disregard that as real it doesn't explain these other examples, unless the church knew we'd be asking these questions of authenticity but I doubt they went that far because the accounts are few and far between. They seemingly only forged one passage in Josephus, but again there's possibility they forged both, and even then Philo and Tacitus who don't support Christians still wrote about Pilate as a real person.

There's also a stone that is dated to apparently be the same time as before 26-26AD which translates the Latin to "To the Divine Augustus Tiberieum Pontius Pilate, Prefect of Judea has dedicated". It's said that this Tiberium is likely a building of some form dedicated to the emperor at the time which would've had this inscription displayed. This was discovered in 1961 by the way, when NG was still preaching pseudo mentalism. If NG claims that EVERY character of the bible is allegory then explain this?? Philo of Alexandria wrote in around 41AD relating to Pilate saying "Pilate was inflexible, stubborn, and cruel disposition, who administered the province with corruption, violence, robbery, assault, abusive behavior, and frequent executions without trial". He was being critical of Pilate here. There's more quotes. "He was accustomed to treat the people with contempt, insolently overstepping the limits of his authority and driving them to despair". "At the time he ordered that Roman standards bearing the image of the emperor should be carried into Jerusalem, an act which deeply offended the religious feelings of the Jews, who regard graven images as idols.". "When the populace was roused to anger, the Jews protested and sent delegates to complain to the emperor Tiberius. Upon hearing the complaint, Tiberius ordered Pilate to remove the standards.". "When a mob of Samaritans gathered on Mount Gerizim, apparently intending to rebel, Pilate took harsh measures and ordered the soldiers to surround the mountain and kill many of the insurgents, including innocent bystanders.". These are the direct words of Philo who is said to have written in 41AD, though that's still an inferred date and using likely second hand sources, though for matters like these including the Pilate stone, which was actually found to be used as part of a stairway in a theatre which is estimated to have been renovated around the 3th century. Stratigraphy which is layer based analysis of the stone claims it's definitely before 3rd century, and the inscriptions match the lettering style and abbreviations and layout that were common from other stones during the time of Tiberius and that the limestone used using material analysis shows the weathering and markings on the stone used to engrave it are consistent with methods used in those days. Basically there seems to be zero agreement that this stone is a forge, so it's not planted after the fact to validate a story that never happened by the church to empower control. So as I said how can NG just say that this is all made up and that Pilate never existed physically? What a joke. With that being said and we go back to the coins again of Pilate that I mentioned, we're talking over the entire Mediterranean world here with only one coin referencing him or anything related to Christians, but once again it's unlikely many would've commemorated it even outside Rome since they were still seen as rebels. This is mostly a mute point really when you look at it this way. I mean how many arguments do we need to go after here from people who claim to be experts? I also forgot to mention there was a coin

The modern history hoaxes that we've extensively studied in earlier pages like the holohoax and fully refuted 100% do not validate this doctrine. We must be as objective as possible and drop biases, It's fine to go in having certain expectations of what you'll find but finding contrasting data should shift that, and considering how deep I've done study into iron age OT references it's clear to me that many of these cases can LIKELY be explained allegorically, though I doubt that it's ALL that way considering it was common for rulers of those times seemingly to gloat about victories in war, with Pharaohs trying to one up their predecessor. It's difficult to pinpoint exactly physical historical data on those events considering there's such little data outside of scripture itself. If we take scripture at face value the doctrine is clear, Israelites are light and followed exactly what I wrote about before in the redacted pages, that still stands 100% correct when you view scripture in a vacuum and refutes the universalism perspective fully, and really only further validates the alchemical perspective even more. There seems to be partly physical history which is there, and also metaphysical allegory on top.

The biggest issue we have is that Jesus's story is always viewed under this lens of how every miracle and his resurrections and all this somehow must be shown to be valid. That's completely beside the point of the scriptures if you understand them, seedline level and allegory too. His claims of divinity are what most criticize, though if you ask me, it's clear he did exist based on all the surrounding data. Even the conventional secular scholars think that he existed physically, though obviously the claims of miracles and the earthquakes and the sun darkening and all that with the star and the virgin birth and all the seeming impossible stuff make that all get questioned far harder, which once again still misses the core doctrine and leads a lot to throw the baby out with the bathwater. I cannot claim that there's proof of the miracles happening, I don't think anyone can prove that with hard solid data, but either way it doesn't really matter. I don't follow the standard Christian faith anyway which I've refuted fully so who cares. That's bunk, and if people judge scripture from a historical basis on a completely whacked interpretation then they're clearly the ones who need to be stopping and asking actually useful questions instead of chasing after red herrings.

We still need to get back to the study of the pagans of the north. There's also interpretations that can be had which explain the examples of seeming ritual sacrifice and such as something else.

I also found something else here just now. There's a coin that's been minted under Herod of Antipas, who was in power right after Herod the great. The coin is dated to around 37-4BC. Three's 2 coins, one with an anchor and one with a helmet. The anchor one has inscribed "of King Herod" and the one with the helmet likely relates to the power of the kingdom under Herod and on the back side the coin shows a shield, so it's clearly a coin relating to strength. Once again another coin which lines up with the biblical timeline. This coin is used to also corroborate dating of the other buildings related to Herod when he was King.

I will once again speak here and say that just because Pilate existed, and Herod, and these other people, doesn't mean they played the role they did 100% certainly as the scriptures say. The gnostic texts which were burred and discovered over a millennia later differ in the story of Christ. Why? Because they're likely focused on the allegorical side of things. The critiques that we went over above before are still under a whacked context, because they're not asking the right questions. This should always be viewed under the context of allegorical alchemy and or seedline doctrine. So how do we expand on this? Well, if seedline doctrine is all just made up, then it would still have to use figures whom did exist and place them into certain roles to give examples of people who could be relatable to those roles in that time period. This can in fact be a correct interpretation if you really look at it this way, because that's at least partly what it is in reality. There's always allegory involved in scripture, somewhere, somehow. You could argue that the Nag Hammadi texts which date to about 340AD that are gnostic and allegorical are closer to the foundations of what you'd consider the alchemical doctrine over modern biblical scripture. As I also mentioned before, just because the holohoax is a thing, and the Juize lie about everything in history, doesn't make the scriptures fully proven to be historical. Being objective when there's so much data involved and conflicts of interest in various sources and all this to factor into account is extremely difficult. All I know is that history we we've been fed is full of fairy tales that conflict. I will say, no matter how you interpret this, whether the Christians are the lights and are destined for glory or not, we're still being replaced, which supports scripture, and the Juize, are trying to fulfil scripture too with how they're acting out these conflicts. How do you make sense of these things other than that they're there as simply just distractions under a metaphysical allegorical interpretation? They go to such lengths simply for control and influence and power. That's pretty much it really. It's the alchemists vs the ones who want control, mostly to act as a balancing force to keep us small and provide a supply of conditioning on earth to challenge us into expansion. That's really the only common sense way you can make sense of all of this trash out there from an allegorical alchemical metaphysical interpretation. The Juize themselves will play into seedline doctrine by playing their role in seemingly fulfilling scripture just to distract us and make us think it's real? That's a very very big implication if real.

We should consider then, that the original Christian writings, were possibly themed on alchemy, and then soon after then turned into what's out there now. The point that I don't agree with about this is what they've got an objectively incorrect interpretation of scripture which I've fully explored systematically and proven beyond any shadow of a doubt, The doctrine is lineage based, be it physical or otherwise, alchemically substance based, and either way it doesn't support the narrative that if the NT as it is written in the bible today, that it's exclusively written to control with no fact of reality there. If they're going to make their own doctrine, then why contradict their own doctrine is my question? If the church created all of the NT stories as we read them now, why preach a story that can be refuted and doesn't connect to what it actually says even physically speaking? That's a dumb take, unless they're so secretive with the true text that they actually "accidentally" encoded secrets in there that are designed to be hidden. The alchemist says they wrote the scriptures to code allegory with SOME history to distract people into something tangibly based, while NG says it's ALL symbolic of states of consciousness unfolding. The history that's presented doesn't even line up with what's preached, and I've shown various examples in time where light Israel was in fact preached and the universalism doctrine wasn't how it was historically interpreted on mass. Like how do you make sense of all of these threads? There's seeming contradictions all over the place that cancel each other out. It's wild to think that if this was a created doctrine that it's got so many layers of depth there that they themselves don't even play into. Alchemist says that Christ did exist and he taught alchemy to the initiates. NG says he never existed and it's all coded allegory. I say there's elements of truth to both, scattered throughout. You can't make full sense of this one way or another, though there's still heaps of data to support physical seedline doctrine, but I would say not as fully conclusive. The one thing seedline doctrine has going for it is that there's no contradictions in the doctrine, unlike universalism. It's still VERY possible that the story of Joseph of Arimathea was real and that there were lights who travelled north to Britain as I've said which ties into seedline doctrine, because if there is ANY truth to physical biblical doctrine it MUST be according to these interpretations because the Juize as the chosen people and Israelites DOES NOT WORK ON ANY LEVEL. It must be that lights are the Israelites physically which of course makes the most sense historically too, but again doesn't validate this perspective 100%. My brief studies into this so far have yielded inconclusive data, but enough to show there's LIKELY something there, if we're being as objective as possible.

Ok so I've done more digging into the other sources, such as Tacitus and such since they're big supporting parts of the physical Jesus stuff. There's zero references to Tacitus's Christus passage that I've spoken about until AFTER the 14th century. I went through a lot of digging to confirm this. There's a book written on this called "Tacitus and Bracciolini. The Annals Forged in the XVth Century" written by John Ross. I won't go into the details here but if you want to find more data on this then read it for yourself. Considering the cross referencing (a subject I should've looked into sooner by following books that have other sources listed and you follow the trail) difficulty it's not surprising I never considered this before that it was a forge, which I was THINKING was possible with those "flashes" of thought but never took them seriously until I'd exhausted all other options because I didn't want to give into the so called scholarly acceptance because these people are usually just buying into what's well paid. You'd expect that Tacitus would've been mentioned by other writers, even IF he was hostile towards Christians. There isn't any references until over a millennia later There's probably more here. Philo likely has errors too. Man there's so much digging to do just to "prove" this. Like I WISH the law worked, where I could just have confirmed whatever I want in a vacuum and live in a world of perfect comfort without challenge, though that would get boring.

Ok so I found more sources pointing to the Pliny letter to be forge, as well as the Trajan letter and Suetonius too. I will read through these, because these could be slam dunks against Christ being real, and collapse this whole thing but I need to read more. This doesn't disprove the light Israelite doctrine though, that's a whole other story to go into more. Also I've asked multiple AI systems to provide evidence of Tacitus's writings before then and there's no reference outside of the books printed in 1468, and wasn't mentioned by any other writer as a reference in direct quote until the end of the 16th century, so aside from the supposed original from the 11th century which academics use to say it's real there's ZERO mentions for a VERY long time for seemingly a VERY important quote. The annels as it's called wasn't even called that until it was given this title in 1553. These AI systems have so much bias and just leading the context like you'd lead pathways in your own psyche makes this clearly visible. You shouldn't study what they say because I had to ask it the same question like 5 times to get a coherent response about time periods and sources because it seemed to want to shift the discussion into another direction towards supporting the Tacitus being real. I can't fact check what John said in his book, because I don't have time or care to go that deep, but from what I've seen so far it's legit. Once again it wouldn't surprise me if this is forged, though apparently academia generally agrees it's real. Part of me questions this further due to financial reasons. The continued debate on Christian doctrine keeps money flowing, and the circular reasoning that comes up saying that these forces like Tacitus are the perfect way of moving money. What still blows my mind the most is actually that Rome made up a story that didn't even logically fit the scriptures physically speaking. That's crazy, the most crazy of all, unless I'm once again actually finding something FAR deeper than we could've expected with this whole light Israelite tradition that was oral and went out into the world. I need to still do more study on that but at this point I'm going to discount all the extra sources that reference Christ and such from the 1st century. Why? Because they have other errors that conventional historians don't want to look at, just like in the virology and microbiology and physics crowd, who play half games to find more money and acceptance. Even if Tacitus and other writers are in full or at least partially forged then it still brings into question EVEYTHING ELSE. Right? I mean I know Tacitus gets pretty much everything second hand, just like the other sources we went over last night, but it's just so hard to verify stuff that happened so long ago. I'm not someone who's studied Tacitus with every detail and other claims and errors that are pointed out in this book I listed above, but it seems there's enough to prove it's not as authentic as we'd think, and that in itself makes you think that the link to Christ from these other sources as being a man also were faked. REMEMBER THAT DOESN'T MEAN HE DIDN'T EXIST, but it means the story that we've been told IS LIKELY NOT TRUE!

It's funny that Tertullion.org (a VERY pro Christian author and apologist at the time who this website was named after) actually has an entire page referencing debunks of the book I listed above. I doubt someone would write such a book and go to such detail if there were clear issues, it sounds like something I'd have done just to prove a point, and this seeming debunk from Tertullian.org which once again, according to this hypothesis above about keeping debate going and money moving, would add up perfectly! Money is a big motivation, and power that comes from that. This website claims that the claims started with Voltaire of all people in criticizing the French revolutionaries. Now this is a VERY interesting point in time, because Napoleon was granting power to Juize as well, based on other study I've done around that period as well. The exact dates elude me but they're there in my other pages that are invisible. There's also an interesting reference here to a book by Leo Wiener about how Tacitus Germania was also forged. That's something I was referencing yesterday, looking to make sense of relating to seeming pagan practices. That wouldn't surprise me IF IT WAS! I mean I discounted most of that as second hand anyway because it was, he wasn't there to see these people. Tertullian I've basically discounted because his doctrine is incorrect from a biblical perspective anyway. Unless the writer follows seedline doctrine I consider them to be part of the scam of the fake church.

If you ever want to find out how the truth works then you have to dig into your enemies sources, and also ask the right questions. Question EVERYTHING. Don't just follow what commentary says, though take it at face value and see if it holds up, which you've seen me do. I went over it and then I went over the opposing sources. The thing is that with history, you've got layers and layers and layers of sources that will claim stuff that's not FULLY verified meaning every angle of conflicts of interest are factored in. I'll say that pretty much every historian out there lacks the IQ to ask such questions and widen the view to include themes that could prove necessary to grasp the context of what happened under a totally different lens. I view everything that supports conventional Christian doctrine as trash to be refuted and not to be taken seriously because it's so easy to do so, which means if I find sources claiming that Tacitus is real based on Christian apologists then I know there's massive massive barrels of cash involved in keeping that going. There's no other way you can look at it with common sense views. There's still a ton of other questions involved though, and looking at screens for so long burns up my blood, literally. I still stand that there was a historical Christ, teaching alchemy as an oral tradition, and possibly had his followers move north. The Roman Church created the narrative we have today, as in the universalism narrative,, I KNOW that and have known that since at least 2021, but I never fully proved seedline doctrine until earlier this year with a much more expansive study, though I figured that was the case long before. Thing is that I didn't study the NT timeline and figure out what's real and what's not. There's data but lots of that data is probably half true relating to these figures who recorded so called history. The coins that we went over and the Pilate stone would indicate there was a historical guy named Pilate, which is probably where they got the name from to add into the bible as a sort of half truth adding on things he never did, if that's also true, but who really knows. In my opinion, red flags went up when I was writing out those quotes about how ruthless Pilate was because those writings depicted a much different Pilate than what's read about in the bible but I didn't take those thoughts seriously. This is why I say to trust that sense you get of what's right, because even if you can't prove it, it probably is, but then there's conditioning that tells you thinks you think you think are right but aren't, so it's a matter of cultivating enough space to perceive fact from fiction. Another question that came up is when Tacitus mentions "Christus" you could say this would relate to anyone who called themselves this name too, that's a common secular argument but it's still real. I don't think it's a useful question because you can't prove it either way but it's a considering factor though considering what we know happened with the church promoting a fake model of Christian doctrine it wouldn't surprise me still if much if not all of Tacitus and even others were forged. We could say with pretty strong confidence that Josephus talking about the so called messiah who performed miracles as he states is forged, so as I was thinking days ago about this what would stop then these other authors from having forged passages in them as well? Why not? How would you prove that? Well the book I listed goes into tons of examples, many of which I'm sure are valid, and even if some are not fully accurate or half accurate or not at all it doesn't take away from the overarching thread. I did write many times that we should question any of these sources because THEY'RE SECOND HAND, as the source for example Germania actually states. There's another one that's interesting too, where a guy named Serapis was called "Christus" too during that time. I've not looked too deep into this "other Christ's" of the time until now and it seems there's many others claiming to be a Christ, AKA a messiah or savior. This is the point. No matter how you look at it, really, if you widen the view, the relations between these passages and biblical doctrine isn't very clear. This also doesn't refute seedline doctrine either though, about the lights being of a higher caliber, but that's a different question. A question I never asked or took seriously until recently either is about how the Romans, if they'd have kept a record of someone who did such stuff would've called him by his name, AKA Jesus would've been mentioned specifically, you'd think. Christ is a title, as I mentioned, so how would you verify it was him of all people? Who knows. If the records cited by Tacitus who is recalling Roman history had the name "Christus" and nothing else, then you'd think that was terrible record keeping. They would've had his name written down, for real. I mean in the gospels they have his name there, Jesus, on the frame above him on the cross as "king of the Jews".

I've spent a while going over yet more points that explore more forgery. First I want to explain that the church fathers all wrote a long time, many decades AFTER the death of the Christ. We've already spoken about that as established fact. The other writers who claim historical foundation in "Christus" also wrote long after, and often had likely forges in their works which once again we went over many months ago as well for example in Josephus. Next we have the issues with bronze and earlier age history. Most references can very likely be shown to simply be allegorical copies, which I never knew until recently actually because I never went over that history in any real depth. Now I know. I also likely will find out that in the hieroglyphs there's going to be yet more mentions of biblical figures, likely under the same context. Plotinus said that the gospels were fake completely (someone who I respect and have studied extensively) as well as Porphyry who also said similar statements about the NT.

The letter of Pilate is fake.
The gospel of Pilate is fake.
The gospel of Nicodemius is fake (take my word for it)
The epistle of Jesus is fake
The apocalypse of Peter is fake
The gospels of Thomas, both of them, are fake.
The acts of Andrew are fake.

You could basically say that everything that's NT apocrypha except the ones in the 1611 one like Maccabees I and II are fake too. I'm going to stand on this. Apocryphal texts from the NT period between 1st century to around 4th century are almost certainly going to be fake forgeries. I KNOW that Josephus had forges, and Tacitus likely had forged text, as well as the rest. Let's just go ahead and say it. I will also quote Augustine (of Hippo) who was by the way a Christian historian and theologian from around in 4th century who tried to prove the historical basis of the NT story and wrote about the fabricated texts that were used to justify Roman expansion, He said in his work "retractationes" "For that which is now called the Christian religion existed among the ancients, and was not absent from the beginning of the human race until Christ came in the flesh, from which time the true religion, which already existed, began to be called Christian". He also said "I should not believe in the truth of the gospels unless the authority of the Catholic Church forced me to do so". He wrote this after Christianity was made legal in Rome, obviously, because of his role. I find that interesting.

D.M. Murdoch wrote "In fact, the Church started out in a contentious manner and continued in this way for centuries, as is evidenced by the endless forged texts and bloody battles over doctrine. " and the most interesting one that I've contemplated on too here "As the Christian myth was being formulated its proponents were, as noted, ridiculed and rejected by the Pagan intelligentsia, such that they were compelled to create forged texts and long rebuttals to dispute the various imputations against them. In this way, the Christian product became increasingly historicized for a variety of reasons, one of which was because of the charges that the conspirators had simply plagiarized older myths and legends. Indeed, historicizing their godman allowed the Christians to distinguish him from these more ancient mythological characters.". Both quotes go over "forged texts" which is objectively correct, in the case of Josephus especially.

There's links between some stories here as well. This is also from D.M. Murdoch "The Hellenizing charge under Antiochus was led by the “modernist” Zadokite Jesus, a “sage from Jerusalem,” and was opposed by the Hasmonean/Maccabean Mattathias and his sons, one of whom was named Judas. ". This was during the Maccabean revolt which took place in 167BC, which Josephus talks about too, so it's not like EVERYTHING in his stuff is forged, but some of it seems to be. That's the thing, it's almost like these texts are deliberately tampered with over time by certain authorities to justify their acts. I'll also quote this again. Bishop Warburton denounced this quote from Josephus about Jesus being the messiah as "a rank forgery and a very stupid one, too.". Eusebius who tried to prove Christianity was historical said "They possess also short works by early writers, the founders of their sect, who left many specimens of the allegorical method, which they take as their models, following the system on which their predecessors worked." as well as "It seems likely that Philo wrote this after listening to their exposition of the Holy Scriptures, and it is very probable that what he calls short works by their early writers were the gospels, the apostolic writings, and in all probability passages interpreting the old prophets, such as are contained in the Epistle to the Hebrews and several others of Paul’s epistles. ". Interesting. I found another quote here from someone referencing Eusebius named Robert Taylor says "Eusebius has attested, that the Therapeutan monks were Christians, many ages before the period assigned to the birth of Christ; and that the Diegesis and Gnomologue, from which the Evangelists compiled their gospels, were writings which had for ages constituted the sacred scriptures of those Egyptian visionaries.". As said before, Christians can relate to anyone considered as a messiah to be a Christ, because Christ obviously means savior, messiah. Yeah. Pliny with his quote referencing "Christians" supposedly was changed from "Essenes" which was the forgery.

It's crazy. There's like a heap of forged stuff that the Romans wrote to justify the control of the Church. It makes me compare those days to the modern media to screw with people to believe trash. Who owns the media? Juize. I mean isn't it crazy that in their own text they consider themselves to be the chosen ones. Sounds like they'd write this wouldn't they, and yet at the same they also somehow ended up putting quotes in there that go against them at the same time. I just don't understand the motive. Like who wrote this stuff? There's so much depth there it's insane. I've analyzed all of those NT scriptures and compared them closely and the hidden meanings to lineage and stuff and it's actually insane to think that this doctrine that's clearly how it makes the most sense also has within it passages which go against the Juize. Funny enough it paints Pilot in a positive light just doing his job, and not as this crazy guy that other writers made him out to be which we quoted earlier killing heaps of people. How does that make sense from a propaganda perspective. Like people are making comments about how they forged these texts to push political agendas but I don't see it, I just don't. It's a pro white text, period. Nobody can refute that position it's so obvious and I can explain EVERY example that would be used to prop up the universalism perspective. I've even found many examples that I've listed here that show that the church for a time believed that the Europeans were the chosen people. It's there very clearly. So I ask once again, what agenda does this serve to force these things which reveal their own damnation? The Juize of the bible are LITERALLY damned to eternal suffering, that's fact. The parables make that clear, and the implication of who Christ reveals the Pharisees to be from later in John 8 as Edomites, based on the OT lineages you can trace and what happened to them and how they said they weren't in bondage to any man relating to their seed. Edomites. That's so obvious, and Paul says the Juize killed Christ too, and he makes some very very rude remarks against them which surprised me too. Like the bible is CLEARLY anti Jew, very very anti Jew, which is biting them in the butt to this day, so I ask why would they write such forges if that's suppose to serve them? There's more to scripture than what we think. I still don't think that the entirety of the NT gospels is forged, but some of it definitely is if we're real. John 3:16 for example. It's like they added stuff in, or maybe took things out, I don't know. If the church was caught forging texts then who knows to what extent that applies. My point is that the biblical doctrine taken literally is NOT what is taught today, clearly, and the Juize ARE using this doctrine to attempt to bring about their messiah right now today by fulfilling the whole world turning against them with the Palestine conflict. It's also a spear to possibly trigger the moon star cult (Muslims) into attacking us in our own countries from their mass imports over the last few years as we keep seeing "free Palestine" all over the media and support skyrocketing for this insane cause. Israel continues to forge their own place in history as a people they never were, so if it was this group then why create a text that's revealing that they're in fact the enemy of scripture? It makes no sense to me. I don't know how to interpret all of this really, because it can't really be pro Roman either, since they don't even really play much of a role in the stories. It's Christ vs the Jews, basically. Paul himself literally said the Jews killed Christ and called them heaps of names. So really there's no way that Juize would've written it and forged those passages, unless of course the goal was to get people to hate them, because perhaps that's their plan.

Huh. Perhaps seedline doctrine was their 5D chess master plan. That's one I've considered before, but who knows. All I know is that we're being replaced right now and Israel is hated by the whole world. Why is this significant? Well they're the source of pressure to compromise in the world, who own everything and generate artificial scarcity. These are the so called elites, and it seems that their plan is to continue to remain hated, as though they're keeping this illusion going by operating from the shadows. If the plan was to get people to hate them to keep people then stuck in lack as a function of greater consciousness to inspire expansion by cutting through pressure then that might make sense. I don't see any other way you'd make a common sense spin out of how they'd write their own supposed text into a self hating one that demonizes them, but it seems that their persecution over the history was part of the plan, because Napoleon institutionalized them into power and actually established their home land in what is now modern day so called Israel. There might be more history to this story I've not found yet, but it's there. Austrian painter didn't mass kill Juize either, obviously. He shipped them to Palestine to fulfil their plan of fulfilling this seeming scripture that is unfolding before our eyes now. It's almost like it's written for both parties at once, that the lights will have prophesy unfold with them getting flooded (by people) and all that as well as the Juize with the hatred of the whole world who will be at war in the end times which is when their messiah will show up. That's crazy to consider but it might be how things work. They're playing out this created timeline which different people think is for them, and thus they're shaping collective belief systems through that conditioning, which has SOME underlying history and even alchemical allegory within it too. It's CRAZY. This is why I've studied this text so much because it's so unbelievably deep in how far it goes, which is once again why I am VERY critical of NG and his claim that it's ALL allegory. It's definitely more than that, and the fools who read my stuff and think I fail to understand that it's this or that or whatever projection they want me to satisfy still miss the point. It's more than just this or that, it's all of them at once at the same time on loop. It's a truly metaphysical text that manifests on all levels.

What conclusions have we made about Joseph or Arimatheus? Well nothing really. It's still up in the air, and it seems there's SOME data to support this, though as I've said if Christ physically didn't walk (which the alchemist said he did and I've taken this seriously considering his expansion is beyond anyone else I know) then what do I make of this? The alchemist says he's spoken to Jesus the Christ, who was a saint, AKA an "ascended master". So if this is true and he did exist and taught alchemy then where did he go? Well the most common sense answer to me would be that since he was clearly Euro ethnic then he had to have gone north to Britain, which was the entire point of me going into studying this again to prove that, or not. This is the confusion I face with contrasting all these points. If there's all these forges, and we've established that the standard church doctrine of universalism is fake, and the Juize are using it as their playbook over history and to gain sympathy and push political agendas as well as to seemingly inspire us lights into believing WE are the chosen Israelites physically and yet at the same time we've got the alchemy and then also the NG allegory of manifestation. All of these different doctrines interweave, so as I said, how do you make sense of all of these. We can say that clearly physically seedline doctrine exists as the main narrative, that the lights are the Israelites, and their movements and prophesies that were in the OT and even some in the NT have been fulfilled above any other people, clearly that's established, and so what they continued to follow then was a doctrine that was based not on supporting Juize but going after them, hence marginalization, and the various quotes I've listed of for example those close to Napoleon telling him not to give them power because it would "bring the end of the world", almost as though they knew these Juize were the enemy and that scripture was being fulfilled. So then we've got links to 4th century writers who went to try prove Jesus exited only concluding that he never did. This is just so convoluted and my attempts to gain SOLID clarity have all failed. NG definitely isn't correct, because there are real historical figures in there as we've shown many times. It's just.. I don't know. If the lights ARE physically the Israelites which seems to really be the most common sense explanation for all the data and the role that's played out over time, then the Joseph mythos and stuff around that MAY be correct, and that there were forges to keep that history buried, because even historians OF THE TIME were quoting forgeries too. It's crazy stuff. This is why I can't stand anyone having an opinion on this that's one sided because it's SO FAR from that and it's been almost 6 years now of HARDCORE study to figure this out. I just don't know really. It's almost as though it's been divinely inspired 100%, and it contains all these threads there for a purpose, to generate the confusion to inspire transformation and expansion, to be the catalyst for alchemical refinement of the people over time. The bible has been the text that's been the most important of all texts ever written by a lot. With narratives in there that so many different people can relate to it's pretty clear to me that I can prove multiple levels of interpretation as valid at once, which would mean that it really IS a holographic text, and that whatever you see in it is what you're SUPPOSE to see to bring about your transformation.

That's my conclusion based on all this data. All of them are true at once, as crazy as that sounds, because they all have function to some level in collective consciousness. Functionally though only the metaphysical level is really of value. yeah seedline doctrine is cool too but if that's causing you issues like it did with me in conditioning then let it go, because while yes it is a valid interpretation it's not THE interpretation. I hate saying that, that it's relative, but how else do you make sense of these different interwoven doctrines that have been added and taken out over time and used to serve multiple different people at different times and all that? How do you make sense of this all without going down that route? You can't FULLY prove seedline doctrine, because we've looked at sources from bronze age and late iron age including the writings of guys like Juluis Caesar which describe wild pagan types, like you see in pop culture. Unless those are faked, or are minorities he's talking about, then it's not as likely the mythos of Joseph and King Arthur and Merlin and all that were physically real. I don't think you can conclude that this is true, because there's competing data that's not addressed in the books that claim to prove seedline doctrine 100%. I've bought many of them with real money and read through them all (other than the Moses in the Hieroglyphs but I believe that will only lead me to concluding there's more allegorical copying over history and not white Israelite proof) and all I've cone to understand is that there are examples of history proving that light Euro culture agrees that we were the Israelites and that functional societies came out of this (which is a lot f what my last writings were about relating to being someone to inspire through greatness and to become a living legend quite literally) but it never proved using first hand sources of data that the Euros were objectively who they're claimed as. The DNA studies are still inconclusive too, but there's definitely points that are valid, if you make some slight grasp. I don't consider linguistic studies a valid way of interpreting history, despite what others may claim. No matter how you view seedline doctrine it's mostly used as the inspiration that led to the building of the great periods of time when we were at our height as a people. Now we're not, obviously. Either way, the bible is in fact an alchemical text at it's core, a metaphysical exploration of consciousness.

I'm not going to do much more study on this. I've spent something like 5-6 months of this year studying the bible VERY extensively now. I'm done with this, for now. The amount of concentration that I need to do this work is insane and I can feel it literally depleting my vitality. It's rewarding at the end though.

The mechanics of RS still stand, obviously, Living as yourself, mediating pressure, cutting through conditioning. Going all the way. All of that is still real and applies, obviously.

I also want to reiterate. I still say that, ultimately, following inner truth is the only way to functionally live in this world, and yet at the same time for some people that means living like a Satanist. This means having next to no responsibility for anyone but your own fulfilment. The values of honor and truth and being real, even if it's non convenient to you, do these matter? If manifestation is basically just a self indulgence thing that's satanic by definition then does that mean we live in a world that we can live without responsibility to anyone or anything else? Well, technically, you could live like that, though I don't know how far you'd get. You'd very likely gain the most approval from the world living that way, which is what some want, but how can that be the correct position to live at baseline? This is the issue I face. People read when I talk about responsibility to other people and they retract and think that's bad. IF none of us had a sense of responsibility to anyone else then the world as we know it would break down, because it's ONLY through cooperation that anything in the system functions, though there's lines to be drawn with this. Like we see our people being eradicated at record pace around us, and if you see that are you responsible for doing something about it? It directly impacts you, especially if you have children, and this is what I'm exploring. Thing is if you DON'T see that, then again, are you responsible? Well you'd likely not experience the disruptions in your psyche which happen when you "wake up" and see this stuff, because let me tell you, from experience you WILL face conditioning showing up from these things being revealed. Like watching injustice happening all around you, seeing your neighbors suffering, your family suffering. Are you responsible for solving that problem? Are you contributing to keeping that problem in place through inaction to resolve it or at least be part of resolution? Well if anyone else exists around you then yeah, 100%. Does that mean that you MUST play a part in that resolution? Well as I said if you see it and it impacts you then you'll WANT to be a part of it, which is obviously how I came to care so much about finding out what's going on because I hated being lied to. If you don't know you're being lied to or if you do you drop that and play into the injustice and being complicit for satanic benefit then what's that doing?

It's all these questions. What's correct? Well, as I said, wherever your current operates functionally, matters. If operating and participating in being part of the solution is depleting then clearly you're not in the place to be that, if not at that time at least. If you partake in that and you're not being depleted then that's correct. The point is, does this lead to dysfunction in your life? The other question, is that a satanic perspective to live from? Well you probably drift in and out of "satanic" living, by serving the ego at times for your own benefit, that's functional at times, so labelling it this way isn't really a good way to put it but it gets my idea across clearly about what we're talking about in context. Being yourself, outside the awareness of social issues and injustice, that's not your problem. If you are aware, and it's functional for you still to operate this way without losing vitality and using opportunities of heightened awareness that arise to transform resistance more then that's correct. If you're like me and wanted to partake without vitality availability in the past when I was broke and wanted to live under a tree in the forest, well that's obviously not functional. RS only exists because I made the decision that I didn't want to suffer and never live a life of any real monetary independence in this world. That was a decision I knew I needed to make, because I had almost nothing but my research I'd gathered over the years from 2015 onwards. It was something that wasn't functional, and while I knew about this I needed to let that go by the wayside so I could recover my vitality from being at 1%. So I will say this. The solution is being mediated by God, greater process, we're all in a self correction cycle, as has always been. The people who need to play roles to complete that cycle will play the role that's necessary to the degree they have available vitality to be moved to play it with. Those who don't will play the role of passing by the injustice without care, and as much as that stirs the people who see it and want change, they need to get that it's not functional to preach needlessly. It's often because of liver qi stagnations and such, of lacking control in the personal sense, that those types, which by the way I was and to an extent still am if I'm honest, will feel that way about the fools who ignore the obvious objective reality and facts around them with the blinders on playing dumb games jumping circles around to justify inaction. "I, not responding to that". What a joke. The problem isn't that these people can't see, it's that you care too much, your vitality is the issue, as I learned many years ago. My care for the inaction of the blind around me was keeping my stagnations in place and being unable to manifest control in my own life to any meaningful degree. Every time I initiate too much care for those things again I end up in HARDCORE dips, and as I said the only solution is to just let it go and realize that you're not here to save the world. You're also not responsible to play a part you don't have vitality to play, if those who are putting in more to clear the injustice that keeps us all collectively in less availability of vitality at baseline, then you can say "I don't have the energy for this and you need to respect that".

It's all about vital current being available or not, which manifests dynamically the psychology of the functions the circuits that's moving through is activating. That's what EVERYTHING is. It's almost entirely about as I said in my first videos "aethric pressure gradient mediation". There's no broader way of looking at it than that, because you see realty from a yin and yang level and their dynamic dance. That's the point. So I answered that question quote clearly. We're not here to compromise for what we know doesn't work for our vitality, because that's really why you feel the way you do. You're here to nourish the circuits that need nourishing and thus individuate. At that level, if you're going to be inspired to break the Juize down and eradicate the problem then you will, otherwise, it'll be something you watch from afar, and that's fine. The ones who make a big deal about that are the issue, because of the lack of personal control, it gets projected out externally, EVEN IF THEY'RE CORRECT IN WHAT THEY SAY OBJECTIVELY! Being logically correct and having more of that honoring attitude of WILLINGLY sacrificing self to some level to provide further collective availability IS functional and WILL manifest in this world, those people WILL find more value through such acts in the coming time, but that's not here fully quite yet. This is why I say, those types are operating ahead of time and most of the others just haven't caught up yet in their widening of awareness. It's there, it's real, but the degree it "matters" and takes authority and precedent matters only to the degree that it washes over you in a functional way. So that's my ultimate answer to this question of living with honor and glory and living as someone to be respected and seen in a high value by others. That's a FUNCTION OF LIFE, but it's only a function for those who are designed for it, even if in a sense we COULD all live that way and CAN, it really depends, is there available current to mediate those pressures and unfold that experience in a functional way? If not, then you know the answer, you're not going to live with honor. Those who do, then let them show that, and be the example to lead and whatnot. Ideally, we could all be of high standing and functional in a collective sense, but that's not what reality is for here. If we all continue to buy into self serving lives and ignore the obvious issues with being collectively devalued by banking elites and media propaganda and the trash in all the food and water and whatnot, if all we live for is our own comfort then we WILL be enslaved by these systems of control and we WILL be forced to face the facts of our own comforts DON'T MATTER AS MUCH AS WE'D LIKE and thus the pressure to continue to compromise on solving the obvious issue vanishes and we break the box that's keeping the overexpressed satanic self serving perspective in place. It is ONLY through self sacrifice, in the external, with ACTION THAT'S DIFFICULT, does the collective availability of vitality change and we all get availability of resource and such at baseline. That's the NECESSARY pressure that's being faced on a mass level which WILL be broken, eventually, just as it has over history. It's ONLY through challenging that established "I don't need to worry about that" that the condition changes. PERIOD. DIFFICULT ACTION UNDER PRESSURE MATTERS, no matter if it's personal life stuff or otherwise, it WILL need to bae faced one way or another, else the consciousness becomes so dysfunctional its parts separate and it dies. You're here to expand, to become MORE functional, and that obviously involves tending to conditioning that's festering in the psyche as dysfunction, and collective issues of slavery to banking systems which suck more and more and more out of us every day IS PART OF THAT PROBLEM BECAUSE IT IMPACTS YOU AS WELL, though some more than others of course, but it comes for all when there's nobody left for the parasite to leech off. There's people who have cast belief containers over us all, the dysfunctional banking system is the most obvious one which WE ALL SUFFER FROM, I don't care if you have billions it's dysfunctional at baseline because every dollar is tied to debt, so it's still debt that's tied to you because you pay tax, and that's only because of the debt because you have money. You can't escape it, partaking in it automatically ensures monetary slavery exists and it will impact everybody around you until that condition is resolved. That's just ONE example, and being ignorant of it doesn't make it vanish, it only empowers the people who use that ignorance to keep the stage act playing out, and the billionaires are the ones who are actually feeding off this parasitic belief the most. Is it evil to have lots of money? No. You can have lots of money and be functional to provide value to the system, but being a billionaire is most likely meaning you're a disgusting satanic parasite because nobody NEEDS that much money. Don't care the reason or subjective reality, it's objectively dysfunctional. The people at the top who use this belief structure to cause you to buy into it and conform to it because it seems to big that it's not even there, those are the ones who we need to break, that belief system, because if you use money of the modern kind then you're participating in debt based systems and will continue to provide tax money to the state for stuff you've bought. You buy a house and you still pay rates on it, you don't own it. I could go on and on. The thematic exists and it surfaces in so many different ways, and challenging this belief container is next to impossible without fully dismantling it because it's so widespread. The people at the top simply do what they want. Really what we need to do is out compete them and be greater than them to conquer this system. Conquest through eradicating parasitism in greatness, and you guessed it, that's VERY challenging. Either way, as I said, if you're here to play that role you will, and those who aren't who are here to contribute to the system, they will too. It's that the people at the top can "play god" and impose their desires on us all. That's the point. You're being conditioned by invisible containers which bind you in ways you don't even know, that's how deep this goes. These invisible strings which are conditions for lack that infest everything in this system, and those who can see it feel the necessity to break them down because it's an obvious problem. If you don't see a problem then it's because you're not seeing the reality. Remember reality is vital current that's thematically manifest, not some subjective box of "mind" that you get to decide and invent what right and wrong are because in that box only you exist. That's what the people at the top believe, they're almost immortal in a sense, from their own psyche positioning. They're not actually immortals, but they operate from a position where conditioning doesn't prevent them from creating boxes around everything that serves them, and that's the ideology of parasitic Satanism, and a lot of people unknowingly fall into it. You don't get to decide if these strings are put on you or not, you're born into it, and these people are almost put into those positions of influence by God to enforce that conditioning to enable the matrix of expansion out of purification by fire. Those conditioning boxes exist for that purpose. It's that those who operate from the level of self serving ideology don't have to discover what right and wrong is, objectively, they can just make it up and totally detach from any consequence of it. It's the functional part of breaking boxes taken to an extreme. To these people. there's nothing wrong, really. They're just playing the game, and you being a part of the game have to lv up to see the hidden rules of the game and break them down. You discover the fixed functions that exist, and in that you get the privilege of eradicating the relative subjective reality that's been conditioned by being part of that solution. Self serving satanic ideology breeds relativism, and this leads to suffering, because people will think higher function that's better for them doesn't harm others, when it does and will, because we don't live in that kind of reality, despite what the people in LOA want you to believe. We do exist with others who do have responsibilities and such in their own path as well, and so propagating moral relativism is only going to make you an agent of dysfunction in making clarity unavailable at baseline for everyone who's buying into the box you created that serves you. You see now? Your perception of reality isn't ALL there is. There are fixed functions we operate within, and until we learn what those are, we're operating incorrectly, even if you don't see that, and yet seeing that doesn't mean you're limited either. That's the dance of the dynamics of yin and yang, right and wrong, correct operating and dysfunctional operation. We learn these in our own personal lives, so the other level of this expands too, obviously. Rights, human rights, are all functional, where as "wrongs" are objectively wrong. We all know this, and that proves you don't live in a relative reality in itself. We're being objectively harmed on a regular basis because we're fed objectively wrong information, such as the propaganda, and the bible as we've explored. That's not a subjective realty, it's objectively wrong, for everybody. Being told something incorrect when it's correct is dysfunctional. It's not all subjective beliefs that run everything. If something depletes your vitality then it's objectively wrong, obviously. These fixed functions and "rules" exist. Wake up lol. That's how we operate, and until we discover what's right and wrong, we're going to live in delusion and not even realize it, which is most people in LOA. If something you do causes harm to another, either directly, or indirectly, you're contributing towards dysfunction. CLEARLY, even if you don't WANT to admit that, or it's not convenient, it's still an objective fact of the fixed functions that exist. Sweeping it under the rug is part of the problem. Don't guilt yourself for making money for your standard of living that you desire, though, that's just parasitic for yourself. You deserve that, as we all do, obviously. Use common sense. No extremes. The truth lives in the middle where the balance is.

We exist in the furnaces of life to suffer which makes expansion necessary under pressure. That's my explanation. Time to move on.

Live as though you're being watched aby an invisible camera. This invisible camera is translating everything you do into more of what you do. That's how we should live. The decisions we make matter. I thought about this perspective of things some years back and I believe I've mentioned it before somewhere but this is one that entered my mind once again. Live this way to manifest BIG shifts.

12/9/25

I can't find enough conclusive evidence that there were migrations of light Israelites into Britain. Doesn't add up fully, contradictions can't be clearly reconciled, despite reading through tons of data on this and studying the details of sources, which we went over. Also the data I went over on the written stuff in the notebook here is only like 10% of what I've actually been through, those points are just the most relevant of all really. It was insightful to go through the bronze age history relating to references to biblical characters to those ancient peoples. I will say that I can't fully prove this but I believe those references are related more so to copied allegory than not, given the overarching context. That still doesn't explain dual seedline doctrine in the bible being the only logically consistent one which explains how things are physically though, but if we take it at its own merit then it becomes significantly easier to make sense of all things considered. Occam's razor, the most simple answer is usually the most likely one. It's typically that this is true, but I still want to KNOW by eliminating all the data that doesn't add up.

One thing I've learned through diving into so called academic viewpoints is that, most of the time, historical dating is INFERRED, never PROVEN 100%. That's the biggest key points I learned above all else through this whole deep deep study. We pointed out many times that unless there's a way of measuring dates with HARD science then you really can't know and it's interpreted that way, which is why the dating range is so wide and so many disagree. It's all interpreted, really it is. History that they claim as fact is mostly inferred and assumed time periods. Makes me want to study this stuff with palindrome systems more. The ACH dating system by following time forward and backwards in fixed cycle periods reveals a lot.

There's still more data I will be going through in the future when I get more books here (Australia takes up to 20 days to get shipments from these little known book stores that still sell rare stuff) and see what I find but I doubt it will change things. I still believe that it's POSSIBLE that the Israelites did go north after the captivity in Assyria into Britain and stuff and the seeming "proof" that academia is so hell bent on using to show paganism in Europe was rampant (which I still don't see enough to prove 100% conclusively) but I still don't see enough. Second hand little pick ups on the side aren't conclusive evidence. The declaration of Arbroath in context is speaking about the migration of the Scythians and likening it to the Israelites, it can go either way if you stretch it, but given the context is almost entirely about THEIR PEOPLE and THEIR TRAVELS it wouldn't make sense to me that it wouldn't be talking about that UNLESS it's for using the Israelite crossing of the red sea as an analogy but that's not how it reads. It's not "like how ___", it's "Thence they came, twelve hundred years after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea, to their home in the west where they still live today.". THEY. The people of Scythia being likened to the Israelites. This still isn't a FULLY conclusive piece of data which demonstrates the history of seedline doctrine but I'd say it's pretty close. We must be objective. There's almost no mention of the ancient Israelites in any other context throughout the whole thing, so I ask once again, unless they used this as one of the only literary devices likening the people in their migration to the people of ancient Israel, then what's the implication? It's points like these that hold questions, uncertainty, inconclusive data. It's always "it MIGHT" but never IS, and considering academia loves to infer stuff themselves just to draw conclusions and thus get published and make money they'll claim stuff just to make their living. I don't make a cent off this work, so I don't have that bias in play, which is why I am hesitant to draw SOLID conclusions, even if I believe certain things may be true going in I can flip that position like a switch if conclusive data says otherwise.

I think the best way to refute the king Arthur stuff is to study the details and recognize if there's allegory there or not. I also still can't conclude if the NT gospel is forgery, though some does look like it even to me, which I explained before. There's too many connections for it to be artificial. I still need to study the "king Arthur conspiracy" and find points that are relevant though, because unless there's enough historical basis in a clearly shown timeline with surrounding sources to support then I can't KNOW if that's legit or not. One interesting note, Baram Blackett and Alan Wilson, who wrote many of these books, both died within 3 months of each other recently. Another researcher named Ross who was on the team also died soon after too. I wonder what that's about. The thing is, I find the Ross who was marketing this material published by them to be money hungry, just the way he speaks, it lacks deep "passion" that I can hear with others who are more "into" the material. It's like he's too "enthusiastic" about it, though it could just be how he talks. That's what I feel, not to discredit the work, but just to make a note.

One of the claims that Blackett and Wilson make as well that I find to be very interesting is that the Romans were ruled by British kings. Once again I don't have the book yet to read details but it's an interesting hypothesis.

There must be more data that's not factored in to make sense of all this. The reason why it's likely inconclusive is because of how vague things really are.

If only Jason was right, on his chronology. Sounds like someone who knows so much, though still has flaws when I really dig into questioning his claims. It seems there's nobody out there will EXTENSIVELY well backed sources and consistently proven correct with their claims. No wonder the relativists claim it's all in your mind, because finding the fixed pattern is next to impossible for any one person to do with so much data out there. Been through 5TB of data at this point that I've manually downloaded bit by bit over the last near decade and it's still not clear to me conclusively. I can have FEELING of what I FEEL is true but that's not what sources may or may not claim in correctness.

This is an interesting note I found. In 1845, Bishop Stubbs (I think that's how you spell it, I'm going off audio here) who was the Regis professor at Oxford and this guy took all the Welsh history books and basically threw it all out and said that they need to only follow the German model in schools from now on, because apparently they know better. This is what he said, as is claimed by Paul Smith. The Welsh traditions, which obviously go way back to early Britain, that history has been buried, and none are the wiser in academia. So this is what I mean, there's more data that likely exists which outlines important quotes from key figures that we don't have access to, or at least I don't yet know about to go verify and check authenticity. So once again, the undertaking in figuring this out is next to impossible for one guy like me. With all the time I spent studying the history of physics and other subjects it took years, almost 4 years of daily study for that one, and most of my notes are totally scattered and it's just floating around in the back of my head somewhere. I need to find the book he's referencing, because he actually goes over the claims that I actually referenced from the writings of Julius caesar about these seeming primitive pagans painting themselves with "woad" which makes their bodies appear blue. I still doubted that this was the actual light people there of Britain, and that the archaeological digs which found bones and objects and all this stuff isn't to be interpreted as so called ritual sacrifice but likely served some other purpose, OR was from other people. I just don't see how 2 sources like that, which let's be real they're NOT definitive in PROVING what they claim, can somehow refute the data that connects the ancient Israelites with the CLEAR doctrine in biblical scripture to that history. It seems the entire mythos about so called pagans come from these few really insignificant sources, and is once again inferred. It doesn't prove much, and the writings if Tacitus DID mention at the start that everything in the book about them was heresay. So ancient Wales, the origins of Britain, this history has been buried, and most sources in modern well paid academia claim they were all savages. I don't buy this. We know the white people we NOT savages, because they were in Egypt, as clearly the DNA studies themselves show of the mummies of the pharaohs, so explain that? Yeah so what, you find digs of bones buried under the ground, big deal. It can SEEM like they did so called ritual sacrifice or whatever but you don't KNOW that, it's AWLAYS inferred, and the main inference these people rely on is the writings I quoted from Caesar. That's not conclusive, but I would give that more weight than the archaeology.

There's writings on old animal skins (doesn't mean they're primitive it means paper wasn't as easy to come by back then for records) about the marriage of Ana with Arvi Regis (spelling based off audio I don't have direct sources for this so take with salt) which was apparently a figure related to Arthur, king Arthur and was I believe a leader of Britain at the time. What Paul Smith also points out, which is actually a point I've run into with other methods of dating in chronology, is that the way they dated much of the history of Rome was that they used pottery and the dating on the ceramics of Egypt to apply to the Roman stuff because it looked very similar and said therefore it must be conclusive. That's NOT conclusive, but it's inferred. OBVIOUSLY. That's what I've been pointing to, actually PROVING history is VERY VERY VERY difficult, so inference is often necessary, but they made it based on pottery. That's been said by Paul to be inaccurate in dating, mostly because the dates on the Egyptian pottery was using the names of pharaohs which have been known to be scattered and unreliable in the dating they claim, likely because they might've used different systems at the time I'D GUESS and so now we have an inferred Roman timeline based on Egyptian pottery with names of pharaohs on them that's all over the place in some cases. That's why he is critical, which I can see is a valid point. This is also why I said that just because some sources date certain things at some times you should still as always take it with a grain of salt.

Nobody in LOA has this experience, or has the critical thinking to figure these things out. That's why RS is different, because my vigor towards demonstrating causal patterns is insane. If I claim something I want to be 100% SURE of it, though I am not ALWAYS correct in that sense I will correct if I make error, which I have done and explained at times. So we can see here with the history we're going over, that it's not so clear as we'd think, and so called scholars make stuff up all the time based on inferred dates. I need more data to go into that I don't have because using what academia relies on and trying to beat them at their own game is me being in the wrong place to find this stuff. I can't do that, I need new data they don't have or aren't willing to accept.

Paul also quotes a guy named Peter James who talks about the Mycenean people who go into this so called dark age which happened around 11800-800BC and yet it's shown these people still basically lived the same way, wore the same clothes, wore the same language, wearing the same hair styles, basically as though the Greeks of that period never experienced any seeming dark age at all. He's saying that much of the timeline is inferred based on false assumptions. It's said that the Illiad written by Homer likely was written during this period of the so called dark ages. I remember in my school history class I studied Greek mythos and compared when that showed up to the architectural advances of the people. Most of that study is way past me but whatever it's just a fun thing I remember. Paul says that the British claim to have also come from Troy, and he says that the trojan war happened earlier than is claimed, and this dating error was a part of why. He says that the Trojans would go through and name where they'd conquer the names of their home in Britain. Interesting note, I can't prove that and it's simply a correlation but an interesting one none the less.

Ah yes, he mentions the map that Julius Caesar uses to describe Britain at the time, who by the way described the so called British as these wild savages which I was quoting. His map shows Britain to be like a nearly perfect right angle triangle. That's HIS MAP. Go search it up you'll see what I mean. He mapped out showing it looks almost exactly like what the land of "Troad" looks like, which is believed to be related to those who considered themselves part of what means "triangle land" and Britain was considered the "new" triangle land. This is a bit of a stretch to me but it's interesting. Troad, triangle land, Britain resembling this. Paul says that London was part of the capital of "Trinovansen" (meaning "new troy") based on what I can hear him talking about. He claims that London being called that in this "triangle land" is what Caesar was mapping on the aforementioned maps. So we have Triangle land, Troy, Troad, Trinovansen which had a capital called London and Caesar mapped this out in geography that was very similar. Paul claims that the number 3 was very common in ancient Britain, and this relates to the mapping. I think that's a stretch but whatever.

Ah this is a VERY good point. Paul mentions that the ancient British often rode around in Chariots, which remember even Caesar himself talks about in those quotes. He also said that someone named "Marchal Abrahams" and "John Michel" have written about so called great migrations where they explains that in a quarry near "Telford" that a stretch of paved road was discovered and dated to be apparently from 100BC while at "inc pin" between "Exeter" and "top nes" there was more paved road discovered on the routes of the "Fosway". Paul claims that the ancient British had roads, paved roads, to ride their chariots around between major locations of travel and there's others like the "ikveal way" that goes from "Wilcher" up to "Norfolk" and so this can indicate that there were people here that were far more advanced than just wild barbarians. Paul also says that Cornwall wasn't just the bottom tip of Britain but it was the "whole south west Peninsula and probably a bit more" which also would've included Glastonbury which is where obviously many of these so called myths come from about Joseph of Arimathea. If this history is correct then the NT gospels are CORRECT historically speaking. Apparently the King who built many of these highways and put laws in place (which I believe relates to modern "common law") was called King Dovernwell Mulburd, if I spell that correctly. His name means "Donald the bald" apparently.

Paul claims that the original Chaldeans (the Chaldees) were from Northern Mesopotamia which is northern Syria and Armenia and parts of Turkey. The city "uur" I think that's how it's spelled, is actually what was called "Urfey" in Odessa which has a cave in there that the Arabs there (apparently Paul has been to this location) claim that Abraham was born in that cave. That's a lot of hoops, but I'll take his word on it. Paul says that Joseph of Arimathea, St.Barnabas (which I doubt) and St. Paul who supposedly preached in London on this hill that was spoken of earlier that I can't remember the name of which has a statue of him there on a pillar. He also says St Philip also supposedly came here too. Barnabas, and Joseph also named "Illiad" and some others came to Britain. He says that the name Illiad if I'm spelling that right comes from the location named Gilead around modern day Syria I believe. More stretches that can't be proven, but whatever,

Paul also says that the "Gallic empire" which I've heard of before also was significant in this history too. There's also a place called "Tria" or "Trio" (likely more "Troy" land like before) which was important as well. There was a pagan god "Isus" (maybe Esus which is claimed too) which was one of 3 gods that the so called pagans in Britain worshipped during the 1st century. How did they get this? Isn't it interesting, remember the notes of Tacitus we read about how they worshipped "Isis" which was an Egyptian god? Yeah maybe he meant Isus/Jesus? Who knows. They're claimed to have worshipped other gods called "Tyrannis" and "Trigoranos" or something like that. Also apparently the people in Gaul were worshipping Esus/Isus in the 1st century extensively. The region of "Tria" had 2 statues found which had the name of "E/Isus" on it. Apparently St. Helen gave the "robe of Jesus" (not the shroud) at Tria. In the NT the guards who were at the tomb "cats lots" to get their hands on this nice single piece robe of Jesus at the time. Here's a quote. Jhn 19:24 "They said therefore among themselves, Let us not rend it, but cast lots for it, whose it shall be: that the scripture might be fulfilled, which saith, They parted my raiment among them, and for my vesture they did cast lots. These things therefore the soldiers did.". So apparently this robe came into the hands of St. Helen and then she donated it to Tria in a cathedral there. That's just a few points. I don't have time for more now.

The currents that are moving through your meridians manifest AS psychological tendencies. Your psychological process and thought processes and pathways are reflections of what meridians are being illuminated by current. That's one big thing I've discovered is true over and over and over.

Just another note on the history, I still doubt that it's all correct as is claimed in these books, there's so much actual "faith" you need to go on for that to be true, just like any other historical interpretation that's outside of scripture itself. Scripture itself clearly has a dual seedline doctrine that's coherent but proving it outside of that you're going to have a tough time, and I mean PROVING it, not just correlations. I personally believe that the way we can put this to rest once and for all is to study the mythos of Arthur and Merlin and such to find if it really is tangible or not. If there's alchemy then it's MOST likely not history, though as I said since we live in a metaphysical reality it wouldn't surprise me if it's both at once.

There was apparently an asteroid (nonsense) that hit Britain in the middle of the 6th century BC. I'll be real, I think that most of these seeming catastrophic shifts were caused by plasma events. The palindrome cycle hits in 582BC, which is KIND OF in the "middle" of the 6th century but not quite. I guess we could have it pass as another reset cycle to explain the crazy phenomena. This is honestly all just probably alchemy with a fixed cycle of history that plays out on loop like it does in our being. The world being like a body with its own currents moving around all the time and stuff. The deeper you go into trying to "prove" this old history the more questions you need to ask it's NEVER ENDING.

You manifest experiences according to the thematic nature of your inner field geometry. Proven once again right now as I write this.

NG can't prove it's ONLY allegory. It makes me wonder if he went over books written about the scam of the church, and that's how he came to his conclusion without digging deeper. What I do know is this. IF the physical dual seedline doctrine is correct then it would mean that allegory was taught. Physical law following wasn't the thing to be upheld, as far as I know.

I'm honestly done trying to prove physical lineage. It's a part of the literal interpretation, and there's lots of hidden history, but that's where it stays.

The one big thing I've learned out of all this study is that the metaphysical interpretation is far more deep than I've ever talked about. Had many insights on that level that I'll write about soons.

Below I'm going to quote from the book "The Holy Kingdom the real quest for King Arthur" by Baram Blackett. This quote proves my suspicions correct about what Caesar writing about the wild so called barbarians not being the British we were actually studying. I assumed he was writing about some other group of people but couldn't prove that since my understanding of his exact geography wasn't complete. This explains it well.

"Caesar’s friendship with the traitor Afarwy possibly explains why in his memoirs he describes the county of Kent as having ‘by far the most civilized inhabitants . . . whose way of life differs little from that of the Gauls’. Unfortunately, in the same paragraph he demonizes the rest of the Britons in words that have coloured the opinions of historians ever since. He writes: "Most of the tribes in the interior do not grow corn but live on milk and meat, and wear skins. All the Britons dye their bodies with woad, which produces a blue colour, and shave the whole of their bodies except the head and the upper lip. Wives are shared between groups of ten or twelve men, especially between brothers and between fathers and sons; but the off- spring of these unions are counted as the children of the man with whom a particular woman cohabited first.*" These accusations are patently untrue. As Caesar never penetrated very far beyond the north bank of the Thames and therefore had no first-hand knowledge of the rest of Britain, it is likely that he was repeating gossip. That his words give the impression that the Britons were bar- barians with shockingly low moral standards, thereby justifying his illegal invasion, could have been part of his public relations exercise intended to win over the home audience at Rome. Moreover, Caesar’s low opinion of the Britons stands in stark contrast to the reports of the Greek geographer Strabo, who was born in 63 BC and died some time after AD 21. It is known that he visited Rome and, as he normally visited the places he described, he almost certainly came to Britain. His unbiased account presents a very different picture from that of the woad-painted savages of popular imagination and is consistent with the Briton’s own claims that they, or at least some of them, were the civilized descendants of the Trojans: "He came, not clad in skins like a Scythian, but with a bow in his hand, a quiver hanging on his shoulders, a gilded belt encircling his loins, and trousers reaching from his waist to the soles of his feet. With a plaid wrapped around his body. He was easy in his address, agreeable in his conversation, active in his despatch, and secret in his management of great affairs. Quick in judging of present accuracies, and ready to take his part in any sudden emergency. Provident withall in guarding against futurity, diligent in his quest for wisdom, fond of friendships trusting very little to fortune, yet having the entire confidence of others, and trusted with every- thing for his prudence. He spoke Greek with a fluency, that you would have thought he had been bred up in a Lyceum and conversed all his life with the Academy of Athens.’" Between Caesar’s first and second invasions, the Trinovantes had, as far as possible, repaired their defences and secured the River Thames from seaborn invasion by fencing its banks with sharp stakes. Other, much larger stakes, ‘as thick as a man’s thigh and shod with iron and lead’, were sunk into the river bed, mak-
ing it impossible for the thin-skinned Roman warships to sail upstream in support of the legions.!° Caesar was therefore obliged to march along the south bank of the Thames until he could find a place to ford the river. "

Right there explains some major points that I had go against seedline doctrine being physically historically based and proves exactly what I was saying before about INFERRED meaning and how these in academia place it on everything to make their work seemingly easier. This in itself is MASSIVE evidence to support that Christ DID exist historically, though I believe he still played a different role physically than the bible explains. Most of his seeming miracles can be explained by personal cold plasma experiences which were revealed only to certain individuals in a sort of reality bending bubble. In reality, real magic isn't visible to everybody. Not everybody seems to understand how this works, but the wielder CAN decide who comes into their subconscious bubble of influence when they're expanded massively as the alchemist has explained.

Britain at the time was more advanced than modern academics will admit. I believe this is key evidence to prove that the validity of dual seedline doctrine is in fact FAR more likely to be real, and that there was a historical Jesus. We went over many other examples of interpretations yesterday, but this adds things up when you take it in context to the big picture because I've been diving into the opposing evidence and we have explanations for that now. This book has good sources too.

It's it funny that right as I always am about to give up I find more data that's big. I will further study welsh mythology. Later.

I want to update you. In the bibliography of this book with that quote I mentioned above about the British not being savages, he listed the bibliography source as reference 9 and I don't see it listed. I can't verify the source of this, and since he's dead I can't ask where he got the source from in an email. Take that with a grain of salt then, but it wouldn't surprise me if it's real anyway, like many of these are which academia doesn't admit.

I've searched for a reference and I can't find one. Even used AI searches but it didn't help either so if we can't identify the source then I'll say to take it with a grain of salt, though this isn't proof of there not being intelligent civilization there at the time. If there were roads in Britain at those times, then they must've been built by either the locals or the Romans, or someone else. I just checked and the Romans didn't have any roads built there for centuries so it's definitely not Roman roads.

Here's a quote from the book on this. I don't know all these places but I will search for sources.

"As well as these Roman foundations there were in Britain at that time a large number of essentially British cities that were neither Roman coloniae nor municipiae. The most important of these were already, prior to the Claudian invasion, the capital cities of the British tribes. They included: Isurium Brigantia (Aldborough), chief Coritani; city of the Brigantes; Ratae (Leicester), chief city of the Viroconium (Wroxeter), chief city of the Cornovii; Corinium (Cirencester), chief city of the Dobuni; Venta Belgarum (Winchester),chief city of the local Belgae; Caleva Atrebatum (Silchester, near Reading), chief city of the Atrebates; Venta Icenorum (Caistor-by-Norwich), chief city of the Iceni; Duro- vernum Cantiacorum (Canterbury), chief of the Cantii; and Durnovaria (Dorchester), chief city of the Durotriges. city Londinium (London) was, of course, the capital of the Trinovantes as well as being one of the largest cities in the entire western Empire. Linking the regions was a complex network of roads. Historians regularly refer to these as ‘Roman’, but some at least may have predated the Roman invasion. The notable feature of the system is that the roads nearly always travel in straight lines, linking the cities of Britain with a spider’s web that in its day was the equivalent of our modern motorway network. The idea that the British 156 never built proper roads before the invasion is contrary to the evidence of the written British histories, which state categorically that they did. According to the Brut Tysylio and other traditional histories, the road system, as well as the common law, in Britain owed its origins not to the Romans but to the actions of a king called Dyfnwal Moelmud (Moelmutius, or ‘Donald the bald’). Tysylio writes: He [Dyfnwal Moelmud] also restored the old form of government, and established the laws, known by the name of the laws of Dyfnwall Moelmyd [sic] (which the Saxons still observe); and gave privileges of refuge to the temples and cities, and to the roads leading to the courts of justice ... He also made many other regu- lations, which Gildas has written of, but too numerous to treat of here; such as the guardianship of the security of the roads leading to the principal towns, and the granting [of] great roads to the temples and cities to the commonality, so that in his time theft and violence were suppressed.’ According to Tysylio, several very important roads were also built by Beli Mawr, father of King Llud. At that time there was a contention as to roads, the lim- its whereof were not ascertained; and he [Beli] therefore assembled all the masons of Britain, and commanded them to make roads of stone and mortar, according to law. One of these passing through the chief cities which lay immediately in the line, went from Penryn in Cornwall, to Penryn Bladon in the North, which is the extent of the Isle of Britain. The other crossed the island, that is to say, Mynyw [St David’s] proceeding along the’ coast, and to Port- Hamon, that is Northampton. He also commanded two other roads to be made intersecting these, passing as the others did through several cities, and terminating Sy at each end in the angular extremities of the island. When these roads were completed, he ordered them to be made sacred, and conferred on them a privilege of refuge, so that whoever could escape to any of them was to be free from impediments, whatever wrong he might have done.® «. These acts by early British kings seem to be the origins of the concept that the ‘King’s highway’ offers special protection to the traveller. The most important roads in Roman times were Ermine Street, running due north from London to York, and Watling Street, which ran north-west from Canterbury and the Kent coast through London to Wroxeter via St Albans. This road also passed near Lichfield, through the ancient town of Letocetum (Wall). A few miles down Watling Street, south-east from Letocetum, there was an intersection with the third most important road in the country, the Fosse Way. This road began on the south coast, on the border of Dorset and Devon, at Moridunum (Seaton). From there it ran north- eastwards through Aquae Sulis (Bath), Corinium (Cirencester) to cross Watling Street at Venonae (High Cross), to pass through Ratae (Leicester) and finally link up with Ermine Street at Lindum (Lincoln). A fourth road ran west from London to pass through Calleva Atrebatum (Silchester), Cunetio (Marlborough), Aquae Sulis (Bath) and on to Venta Silurum (Caerwent) and Isca Silurum (Caerleon). Large stretches of these four roads, and the many others that linked up with them, are still used to this day. Thus it was that Britain entered the Roman Empire already in possession of much of the infrastructure one would associate with a modern, civilized state. Indeed, ruled over by a dynasty of kings, it was not a country of savages but an organized state with cities, religious centres and universities all linked by a functional road network. As trade with the Roman Empire brought 158 * increased wealth to the country, so during the second and third centuries all these things were improved and developed; yet regardless of surface changes in the political and economic spheres, the fundamentals of the country remained the same. "

Lots there. That's the most direct reference I could find about these roads but there is more.

Ok so I've studied the references here. Brut Tysylio who was referenced as a source wrote centuries later recalling history he didn't see himself, but that's not to discount of course. Modern scholars claim it as all legend but I doubt that. They love passing off anything outside the norm as myth. Anyway the work is called "Chronicles of the Kings of Britain" written as an addition to an original work called the same thing in 1136 (by Geoffrey of Monmouth) but this one is a medieval revision written in the 13th century. It's exploring laws from that time, roads built before the Romans, and ancient Kings, which is what his source is. So basically it seems much of the source material for these ideas comes from these texts, and considering modern scholars demote them to being mythos and legend then they say it's not credible, but you make up your mind. I doubt they are.

Ok so I've gone deep into the work of these ancient texts to find references. Here's a summary of what the ancient book (Chronicles of the Kings) says about the roads in one part. "The words of the Welsh text, which are literally translated above, may admit of either sense. " Dyfnwall began the great roads which were completed by his sou Belt"" and "Were these great roads military roads originally, and (lieir use confined to military expeditions ? or did Dyfnwall originally make great roads, and grant a public use of them ?", and "He first made himself a crown of gold, it was he who made the Molmutian laws, which are slill observed in England: he enjoined, that temples, public roads, find cities themselves, and the farmer's ploughs should protect those zcho fed to them. He was sttcceeded by Belinus, zcho made four public roads, and made the laws which king Alfred afterwards wrote out,- viz. those which Gildas mentions. He and his brother Brenmts burned Home, accord tug to Orosiits*". Some of the spelling here might be off, but that's what the copy-paste did with this old book, it's jank but I'll leave it there. Here's another quote. "He ordered them to be made sacred, and conferred on them a privilege of refuge, so that whoever could escape to any of them was to be free from impediments, whatever wrong he might have done.".

This is a summary of other claims from another source which references this book. "Linked major cities and temples, were made from stone and mortar, had legal protections — i.e., they were “sacred” or had refuge rights, included four main roads that criss-crossed the island, like a grid, were supervised by masons and built by royal command".

So I just realized that the book (the king Arthur book) is actually quoting this text directly. If only we had the source for the British not being Barbarians. Apparently Welsh bardic traditions also reference these roads too, which I don't know if this book mentions but they're there. It seems the bards might hold some keys, in oral tradition to recall ancient events.

So I’ve just been over an important question. There’s apparently only 2 reliably shown cases of pagan ritual sacrifice in all of Britain. One is in the south and the other is in the far north. Proves my point perfectly. This is where Caesar went when he was speaking of these savage people of Britain. In my estimation and given all the data that’s been shown, it’s likely that the few pagans which were around at that time were likely in those regions. They must’ve existed, to some degree, but the lack of evidence is pretty obvious that it wasn’t as widespread as expected. The archaeological record doesn’t show much in Britain itself. I’ve run the question through multiple AI engines and it came back with about 15-20 “high proof” cases of established ritual sacrifice over ALL of Europe. Britain has 2 at most and they’re where you’d expect. These are HIGH CERTAINTY cases, not just ones that could be up for debate. Keep in mind this was using GPT and such to attempt to speed up this process and trust that the sources are reliable given I specified “high proof” examples. If we use “medium proof” examples it goes down to 30-50 it says. Take that with a huge grain of salt. Keep in mind the 2 in Britain that I listed actually follow the trend of being very close to the time period we’re studying, aka around late Iron Age early Roman age. Basically every example of proven ritual sacrifice that’s very high confidence and isn’t debatable counts 2 in all of Britain and it’s right around the time you’d expect. That’s the point. There’s next to no evidence then using this as a surrounding archaeological basis to demonstrate Britain was ruled by pagan savages. There were some but they weren’t wide spread. I think this is the most accurate case made for the reality of things and I believe this is a very accurate position to take. King Arthur and those mythos likely physically existed.

I just told it to widen the list to include “all examples of pagan activity between the late iron and early Roman period of time with the regional location” and it came up with 6 examples. Guess what. They’re all in the south, just as expected. The so called pagans weren’t in British territory very far in at all, which remember is where Caesar went with his notes. I mean that’s pretty deep hitting. I believe this is a very high level proof of the so called legends being correct then. This goes with what that predicts. I went over “every” example once again and it came out to be about 300 total pieces of evidence in all over the time period of 100BC-200AD. This includes about 30 shrines built, “Celtic temples” (which is not count personally as pagan because there’s 150 of them and GPT is probably lumping in other stuff), deposits in bogs and wetlands is about 40 where the ritual pits tally to about 50, “sacred wells” tally 30, ritual burials add up to 30, animal sacrifice goes to about 15, human sacrifice tallies 10 and “deity cults” tally 100 inscriptions found. Most of this is in the south of Britain. I also believe that considering this is a very inclusive expansion that’s got signs of what they’d consider seeming barbarian stuff (which really there’s next to no evidence for) this only proves more or less that they had a Celtic civilization that was more metaphysically oriented in their lives. This is literally every example all over Britain and most of this stuff isn’t even savage stuff it’s just open for debate possible cases which it said, so remember take this with a grain of salt but it said clearly that the proven ones were only really like 10 at the most, and they’re all in the south but 1. That proves my point. The human sacrifice examples probably don’t even prove pagan savage cults, just that some whack heads did some crazy stuff. This evidence to me is conclusive to prove that the King Arthur stories were likely accurate. It said that in south west Britain is where most of the so called temples were. The Romans came in from the south, and they encountered whackos. That’s why I believe now pretty strongly in fact that the physical seedline doctrine exists. It’s there in the archaeology. There’s the most seeming pagan activity down south where you’d expect it but once again keep in mind that what GPT considers to be cultish pagan stuff is probably not in various examples and since I don’t have the time or care to dig into hundreds of examples I’ll just have to trust the AI on this one. The hard examples that I asked for that aren’t disputed by many or even any scholars is only 2 and if you widen it out more it’s at lost 10 and most of them are in the south once again so clearly the map we’ve established makes sense with what the archaeology has found. Caesar probably did see whacko native so called pagan tribes but it wasn’t very many. We were always more advanced than that. There were kings inland, we just never got much documentation of it. Crazy stuff.

13/9/25

I've found the names of the gods of Britain that the Celts worshipped. They worshipped "Esus" and "Varvod Trigaranus" and "Teutates". This was their "holy trinity". I've checked this with scholarly sources who all agree this is real. Isn't that interesting though. Esus. I believe this is the name that a lot of people are using to justify the claim that the early Brits worshipped Jesus, because it's the same, and remember, in those languages there was a silent J, and in Greek Jesus was pronounced "eeh-soooss" which is EXACTLY the same as the British pagan pronunciation. This indicates there was either a commonly shared link to the same alchemical deities OR they did in fact have connection to Jesus, physically or otherwise. The proof of this I believe is that Caesar considered them worshipping ISIS, which sounds very similar. Thing is Isis in Egyptian mythos doesn't represent the same archetype as Jesus, or Zeus, or any of those similar sounding gods, so that overlap doesn't work just by name. I believe the Romans considered them worshipping Isis because of how they pronounced Esus, sounding like Isis, or Zeus, or later Jesus, pronounced in Greek to be like "eeh-soos", or "eee-soos" depending on the accent. The Aesir of the Norse mythos can sound similar too,

You can never figure this stuff out definitely. I've got many videos of giant human skeletons and even physical giants that are living which go back to the late 1800's (the images). Once again, if history is as conventionally is claimed AKA George Peabody and later then Rockefeller and Carnegie and J.P. Morgan sponsored systems of education going back to the late 1800's then why do these giants exist? The oil tycoons getting into education obviously is a MASSIVE red flag. This is WHY I DON'T BUY THAT IT'S ALL ALLEGORY! There's contradictions in the available data that aren't CLEARLY defining it IS. Trying to piece together a coherent history with such little data is a nightmare and a half. Neither side can make a coherent case for history.

I also want to reiterate. The Charlie Kirk shooting lately, obviously was planned. What's the narrative that's going around? He was questioning Israel heavily. This is what MULTIPLE people personally have contacted me and asked questions about, including those who previously rarely would touch on Israel. The fact is that more people now than ever know that Israel are run by disgusting filthy Talmudic Jews and it's seemingly allowed to be seen this way. Why? I can't think of any other reason other than that since their veil of deception is lifting collectively and we can see the manifestation of the programming source on earth in plain sight, like the wizard of OZ when the curtain is pulled back, people can now see what's actually happening, and that everything I've been writing here is in fact correct about that, despite many claiming that I'm a bad person for calling a spade a spade. Why is this happening? Because it's designed to happen, because they clearly follow the scriptures as their playbook of the end times, else why would they call their nation Israel and claim they're people who they never were. What boggles my mind is that nobody in the LOA space asks such obviously important questions. If Israel is all allegory then why is there a terrorist state claiming to be the modern equivalent of Israel? They were originally going to call their land "Judah" but decided on Israel instead since it would more easily deceive people. No freaking duh lol it's so obvious. Chew on that charlatans.

If it's not historical in ANY WAY then how do you explain all the coincidences surrounding this stuff which defies at least part of the conventionally accepted and promoted and funded narratives? There was advanced civilization (not like alien advanced but just not tribal barbarians like is claimed) in Britain before Rome showed up.

It's like I need to find reference to the sources that the giants were found, but that stuff is so buried in my notes I have no idea where to start.

I've just stumbled upon a gold mine of data. Still doubt the credibility but I found a ton of study that I can dig into with other books that I've not heard of relating to the history of Celtic Christianity in Britain before the Romans showed up. Let's find out. I still believe that they were applying an alchemical tradition and not a "Roman" version of Christian doctrine but it's interesting none the less. It seems that as far as I know most of the actual factual based data that has sources to reference it other than "what I feel" is unlikely to prove this history definitely, but I will read over it fast and see what I find. Trying to decipher fact from fiction especially from this Catholic trash is sometimes difficult because most of what they claim is utter myth.

There's a book here I've been going over called "Celtic Christianity of Cornwall" and there's some interesting finds. I've not validated sources yet but there's something here.

"The rule of St. Augustine was not introduced at Bodmin until the time of Bishop William Warelwast (1107-36)."

The source in the index is impossible to find because on the footnote of the above quote it says "1" and then in the index that's "magpie". No idea what that source is.

The skeletons of the giants (often have red hair it seems) that I've seen (you can find them around too online with some basic study) could simply be explained by "giantism" genetic stuff but I highly doubt that. Growth and height comes mostly from underlying Jing. You grow shorter if you don't have as much activating fire, which literally grows upwards, and that's a function of the Jing opening up and activating which is how children develop into adults. There's too many examples of the Smithsonian institute (funded by Gates by the way) covering up archaeological digs they sponsor when they find Giant skeletons. Whenever there's digs that get covered up there's something being hidden and if there's something hidden then obviously there's deception involved. We've already made a solid cast for Christian type Celtic tradition before Rome showed up, based on archeology and testimonial accounts in ancient records.

I've just read through the book "out of dust" quickly relating to the archaeology of the Hebrews and such and there's nothing of significant value it's just commentary on his beliefs. No idea why Celtic Christians referenced this text I found next to nothing useful in PROVING it with sources, but there's some good commentary. There's so many books like this, with next to no real hard data. I only care about hard data that's able to be demonstrable evidence of past events, not commentary on ideas. Ancient mythos can be related though. I'll quote something from the book though that I found interesting.

"One of the unsolved mysteries in the life of Moses is: who was the Cushite woman whom Moses married? Why did Miriam and Aaron so oppose the marriage? Miriam was punished for her part in the conspiracy or resentment, by the imposition of leprosy. God held Moses blameless. In the first place the woman was not Cushite. The usual translation of the Hebrew word is wrong. The proper rendering of the word should be Ethiopian. Now the real Ethiopian race is not Negro, as contended by some writers; but is a branch of the white race. It is a mere matter of speculation, on my part, in wondering whether or not the Ethiopian woman who gave Moses the emerald that constituted the first stone of the second row of jewels on the breastplate became later the wife of Moses. If she was one of the women superintendents of the emerald mines, who was she, where did she come from, and how. did Moses come to be acquainted with her? Ethiopian women were em- ployed as miners and as superintendents of these mines. Did Moses know her during the first forty years of his The Mystic Emerald of Judah 119 life, and while he was the “Prince of Wales” of Egypt? Was she one of the ancestresses of the Queen of Sheba? I wonder! ".

He considered the so called Ethiopians white, and related that then to the name "Prince of Wales" of Egypt. I know that there's genetic studies done on various pharaohs of Egypt (for example the later Tutankhamen) who had red hair according to that genetic study, and so that indicates AT LEAST there were SOME lights in Egypt at the time. Wales, the prince of Wales. That's an interesting title. I do not know the reference to this in source outside this text but it's interesting none the less. I've considered that the so called Ethiopians (who by the way claim that they've got the oldest "bible" written which obviously they didn't write it) of today aren't who are referenced in the scriptures though.

"Among the peculiar artifacts recovered is the breastplate of the High Priest of Stone-
henge. This breastplate is almost an exact duplicate of the one worn by Aaron, as described in the Old Testament. The artifact was found still upon the breast of the skeleton. But we must not be astonished at this; rather, we should be astonished if no such artifact were found upon the British shores. The reader may ask why we should be so astonished. The answer is truly a simple one: the man who introduced Druidism to the ancient peoples of Britain was a contemporary of Abraham, came from the same place in Babylonia; and it is undoubtedly true that he was a personal friend of the Biblical Patriarch, and was of the same Faith. This man is known to the Annals of Britain as Hu Gadara (Gaudara). Of course he did not intro- duce into Britain the Mosaic credo, but that founded by Seth of the Mosaic genealogy, who, in the language of the natives of the Islands, was called Gwyddon Gan- hebon. The date for the founding of this credo is usually given as May 1, 3,903 B.c. ".

More interesting data. Again, no references here but it's still an interesting quote. One of the descendants of Abraham apparently was responsible for sharing druidism AKA Christian alchemy in the original sense, into Britain originally.

"They considered the universe infinite, being the body of the ONE who created it out of Himself, either by extension or contraction, just as you please to try to understand the Infinite. The essence of this Being is pure mental light. As far as man is concerned, he is forced to apprehend Him under three different phases: (1) the Creator of the past; (2) the Savior of the present, and (3) the Re-creator of the future. This forms the Druidic Trinity, under the respective names Beli, Taran, Esu or Yesu. This last name is easy to recognize, and in the old British tongue (Welsh) has never the Greek, Latin or Hebrew form, but still re- mains Yesu. In regard to this trinity, the Triads re- mark that ““There are three Primeval Unities, and more than one each can not exist; One God, One Truth and One Point of Liberty, where all opposites preponder- ate. Three things proceed from the Three Primeval Unities; All of life, All that is Good and All Power.” Druidism believed in the resurrection of the dead, not spiritually or symbolically, but bodily; and in the idea of atonement through vicarious sacrifice. In 54 B.C. Caesar wrote: “The Druids make the immortality of a Messiah. of the soul the basis of all their teaching, holding it the chief incentive and reason for a virtuous life.” He also wrote—“The Druids teach that by no other way than the ransoming of a man’s life for the life of a man is reconciliation with divine justice of the immortal gods possible.” This was the Druid way of expressing the idea of atonement and redemption. The historian Hume remarks that “No religion has ever swayed the minds of men like the Druidic.” The Druids and the Israelites expected the coming typified Him as the “Branch” of which the prophet spoke; the Druids typi- fied Him with mistletoe and called Him “The Curer The Israelites of All Ills.” Their temples consisted of stone circles, of stones that had never been touched by metal. The outstanding in literature, of course, is Stonehenge; but there one are many smaller circles scattered over the whole known world, as well as one larger. Usually in the center of these circles are to be found single stones, called Llogan in the Welsh, or THE STONE, which undoubtedly is symbolical of the “Rock” which is Christ. Dr. Petrie settled forever the notion that the Druidic religion offered human sacrifice upon its altars. He settled it emphatically in the negative. He had the temerity to lift the great altar stone at Stonehenge, and found beneath it only the burnt bones of cattle. The Druids were not sun-worshipers, but they were astronomers; and because of their skill in this science and their attention to it, they were accused of being idolaters by ignorant observers and reporters of their activities. ".

That's VERY interesting. Lines up with what we've already discovered. This ancient oral tradition of druidism and their holy trinity, this sounds almost entirely like the offshoot of the OT system. Looks like I'm going to eventually come to accept that Christian dual seedline doctrine, while clearly present in scripture, isn't historical in the sense of what we can PROVE with data. There's data POST 33AD that would prove this but beforehand is much less clear, though there are still data points which suggest this yet they're not overwhelming. White race mummies in Egypt don't prove that they were, but I still believe they were based on everything else we know surrounding it. I can't prove that 100% but it's something that wouldn't make sense to me not to be, considering pretty much all other cultures on earth, say for the Asiatics, didn't have any form of advanced society and still lived with VERY primitive tech. The so called barbarians of the ancient days had chariot as admitted by Caesar, so at the very least they already had more advanced tech, and the quote from that book we went over before would demonstrate that they likely had roads and established infrastructure too, as well as how the archaeology not really showing much in the sense of crazy human sacrifice or whatever is claimed was widespread among pagans. There's very little HARD evidence of that being the case, and this text once again went into how the suspicions of scholars who thought that Stonehenge was a site for human ritual sacrifices found nothing of the sort. Animal bones in the ground could be from anything from various times in history. That's why I realized last night when going into the archaeology that it's clearly not an established fact that the entire region of Britain was just savage primitive pagans, because how could people who seemingly wore animal skins all the time and couldn't even process dairy have chariots? That doesn't make sense to me, and that's what Caesar wrote.

Either way the above quote describes Druidism, AKA an offshoot of the OT tradition in Britain as an oral one. Makes sense to me, which was in fact my hypothesis.

"One of the Druids from early Christian times writes as follows: “Christ, the Word from the Beginning, was from the first our teacher, and we never lost His teachings. to Christianity was a new thing in Asia, but there never was a time when the Druids of Britain held not its doctrines” (Taliesin, the Arch-Druid). Without going further into the Druidic doctrines, which we might do with profit if time and space per- mitted, we may say this; Druidism and Christianity had two fundamental principles in common, the im-mortality of the soul, and the vicarious atonement. The idea of the Logos was-not new to the Druidic priests _when it was propounded to them by the first missionary preach in Britain, Joseph of Arimathea, and even the name of Jesus was already in their language, and they understood readily what the missionary meant when he named Jesus as that Word, as the Vicarious Atonement, as the “Star” that should come out of Jacob, as the Messiah who had long been expected. ".

"The oldest living language of Europe today is the Welsh. It is closely allied with the ancient Hebrew. We shall not go into a discussion of its origin here, but will say that the oldest literature in the oldest living language of Europe is in the Welsh tongue. This literature is known as “The Triads of Wales,” or “The Historic Triads of the Island of Britain.” There are 160 of these Triads still in existence, handed down by oral tradition, and reduced to their first writ- ten form about 600 a.p. The first mention that we have in a literary form concerning Druidism is found in the works of Hecatoeus of Miletus about the year 600 B.c. Druidism is the name of a form of religion, while the word Druid is a title confined exclusively to the priesthood. The title is derived from the Welsh,” “der wydd,” in which “der” means “superior,” “wydd” means “priest” or “inspector.” ".

Yet more interesting data. "Superior priest". Superior race? I mean where did all this come from? If they spoke languages that are close then obviously it's likely closely related. If Egypt had lights there in power and the Welsh closely relates to Hebrew (I'm taking his word for that) then it would indicate yet more physical lineage relationship which has been my thesis this whole time. Druidism IS the OT tradition brought into the early BC time period.

"We modern peoples are inclined to look upon all who are called “ancient” as illiterate folk, people without what is now called education, people without But in this we are
all wrong. schools, colleges, or universities. This sort of belief is purely egotism on our part. We are taught in our schools that these so- called “ancient”? peoples were what we call barbar- ians, i.e., peoples without “culture.” But I say again that we are all wrong. If such a theory were the correct one, from whence, may I ask, came our vaunted “cul- ture” so suddenly? The Greeks had an answer for that question in the legend of one of their goddesses springing full-grown from the brain of Zeus. Let us be fair and just in our study, and attempt to solve some of the problems involved. ’ We now know that, through the influence of Druid- ism, there were forty universities south of the Forth, of which thirty-one have been identified. The total number of students enrolled at any one time was around 60,000. Our modern young people resent the idea that they must spend so much time acquiring a so-called educa-tion; but let them thank their luck that they do not live back during the time of the Druidic Universities. During that period in human culture, the student was required to spend twenty years in the university before he could come up for examination for a degree. There were two mapped courses, and no “electives”:
(1) the course that led to the degree or title, “Druid”;
(2) the course that led to the degree or title, “Bard.”
Each course took fully twenty years, and there were no short-cuts. In some respects the courses were iden-tical, and varied only wherein it was necessary for specific purposes. These courses included the study of natural philosophy, astronomy, geometry, jurispru- dence, medicine, poetry, oratory, etc., etc., and it all must be transmitted and mastered by memory. Those who specialized in theology and its allied subjects became Druids, but the number of Druids was con- trolled by law. The others who specialized along the poetical and musical lines became Bards. The first degree would correspond to the modern A.B.; while the other would correspond to our Bachelor of Music de- gree. Yet the Bard was the more important from the historical point of view, because he became the his- torian and scientist, the legal theorist, the innovator of political activities, etc. From the Universities came the whole civil and ecclesiastic set-up of the British people—their church, parliament, courts of law, college of physicians and surgeons, magistrates, clergy, and bishops. The teachings of the Universities were framed in a literary form known as Triads. In the Orient this form is usually known as Proverbs. Let us illustrate by using the Druidic doctrine concerning man’s spiritual life. The doctrine takes this form:
“In every person there is a soul,
In every soul there is intelligence;
In every intelligence there is thought,
In every thought there is either good or evil;
In every evil there is death;
In every good there is life,
In every life there is God.” (DUW)
Regarding God (DUW) the Triads have this to say: “Let God be praised in the beginning and the end, Who supplicates Him, He will neither despise nor refuse; God above us, God before us, God possessing all things, May the Father of Heaven grant us a portion of mercy.” we When we come to study the philosophy of the Trinity, cannot step beyond that which the Druids have long ago formulated for us in the following: “There are three Primeval Unities, and more than one of the same substance cannot exist; one God, one Truth, and one Point of Liberty, where all opposites predominate. As a result three things proceed from the Three Primeval Unities: All of Life, All that is Good, and ALL-Power.” In their philosophy, the Druids did not attempt to define that which constitutes the soul of man, though they fully recognized the existence of that entity. They did not attempt to solve the puzzle of the soul, but they definitely set forth the qualities of the soul, for they said that in these three things will be seen the qualities of the soul of man: “in what he may fear; in what he would conceal; and in what he would show.” What better can the modern philosopher offer? I would ask: Is there anything new under the sun? In their thinking, the Druids envisioned what we of today call an angel. Nowhere, so far as I know, did they ever attempt to describe an angel; they did not give the celestial beings the form of man with wings attached to the shoulders, nor any of the artistic touches prevalent in our imaginative fairyland productions. Whether they thought upon those things, I do not know; but they very definitely did formulate the qualities of an angel, for they say “three things exist which will make a man equal to an angel: the love of every good; the love of exercising charity; and the love of pleasing God.” And then we wonder where Paul got some of his teaching tenets! In their teachings, and in formulating a philosophy of life, they placed duty far above mere sentiment. Sentiment, for them, was all right in its place; but it must not usurp the place and dignity of duty, They formulate the three duties of each and every man: “Worship God; be just to all men; die for your country.” ".

This one is a gem. I still don't see source material for these claims, just opinions. Keep that in mind and take with a grain of salt. That last quote is interesting. Worship God, be just to all men, die for your country. Isn't that what I teach with RS? People listen to me explaining the importance of morality in operating correctly and yet they swat that off for nonsense and imposing my seeming beliefs on you. Isn't this exactly what the druids taught here according to this text? He's quoting SOME reference to this writing. Either way he was writing about how they had education, which they obviously would've had if they had these traditions, just as we do today. I don't think you need sources to prove that to be honest if we apply some basic critical thinking. If there's data of them having roads, chariots, alchemical traditions that go back to the OT scriptures, then why would we assume that it was anything other than an advanced people who had education and valued, honor, courage, truth? They're not barbaric savages, obviously, anyone knows that who's got some common sense and critical thinking. The other races are more barbaric, they don't have any form of advanced systems. Look at this. Egypt and Assyria and Babylon, all historically speaking reference THE SAME NAMES AS BIBLE CHARACTERS FROM THE OT IN THEIR ARTEFACTS! What does that prove? The same tradition went all through the middle east and into Europe. We don't find really any data to support this tradition being in Africa or in Asia major or Oceana, or the Americas, or anywhere else. It was all Mediterranean region tradition. Think about that. What I've likely uncovered here is a multi millennia Mediterranean tradition that's of white racial foundation (which by the way the genetic studies support) and that the tradition went all through this region and became what the Romans hijacked and the Juize turned into their false origin story when they weren't related really at all. The so called Juize never carried this tradition, the genetics don't align, the archaeology doesn't align, the linguistics also doesn't FULLY align, though some claim it does, but we've gone over some of that already before. The more modern history also doesn't agree, because we have the declaration of Arbroath talking about this same thing too. There's the stone of Scone which went from Jerusalem to Britain after 33AD. I mean there's so much data here, the alchemist says that Christ did physically exist but he taught alchemy to the initiates and was white. There's still no CONCLUSIVE proof of this Christ physically existing though so.

I also wonder if the land of "Troad" and this fascination with the figure 3 relates to their whole tradition and culture being formed around these 3 principles. Isn't that another interesting connection I just thought about. They were all considered the land of the trinity. People can hate on me for being so pro Euro tradition and disregarding everything else, but I say once again, why is this history being hidden and not talked about? Yeah, the real hard data is still pretty vague, but when you get enough dots that just seem to coincidentally line up, then you can't help but form a coherent picture. I will still search for hard data in sources to further back this up, but at this point I still don't see how you can logically refute such a position based on what I said above with all those parts. Keep in mind, I can list at least 28 different discoveries in the last 2 centuries and even earlier that prove that 8 foot+ people with skulls twice as thick as ours existed, some with double rows of teeth. If Giantism is so rare, then why are there so many bodies found that are massive? You explain that? If the myths of the bible are just ALL allegory then we have to be able to explain the giants, clearly that exist, to some capacity at a time in history that's even going back to the 19-20th centuries and earlier because there's various pictures I have and even giant books and tools that no human our size would've used. People still don't want to study this in LOA because they're still too childish to open up to the fact that their God Neville Goddard may not be all he's cracked up to be. I'm someone who destroys other peoples beliefs, always have. Always been a maverick that's ahead of the curve and go so deep that I can't be refuted by anybody. I do this study to find facts that have been hidden from us.

Once again, just remember, you'll find many cases of giants being covered up by Smithsonian institute. Why? What is being hidden? Various skeletons go upwards of 10 feet tall and higher. For example, in 1868 there was a find from quarry workers found a skeleton over 10 foot tall. Now you don't hear about this as much, but back then there were a lot of these skeletons discovered. Jason, someone who's work I respect, says there was a vapor canopy which increased the vitality on earth and we ended up with giant people and even giant animals and this explains the so called dinosaurs and stuff and the giant plants you see fossilized into rocks. It's pretty clear that there was a time in history that there were giant creatures, obviously, but this isn't factored in by NG to his understanding of history. Why are we not taught this? You tell me. I've got pictures of these giants, some of them even living back in the late 1800's and early 1900's before WW1. They're out there, though whenever you study this stuff in scholarly circles they run for the hills and don't want to touch it, because it means their works would be off and lost funding. You need to understand, money is only put into work which benefits an already determined outcome, just like in studies of biology and even physics. There's no open discovery. So I will say that since we have images and various giants I consider that primary source evidence, most of which are pictures from the early 1900's and earlier.

"The Druids taught the doctirine of the resurrection of the dead; but they went still further, and added the doctrine of the reincarnation of the soul, and divers punishments until the soul should be purified and purged of all impurities.".

Yeah. Purged of all impurities alright.

"Some modern people still believe in prayer and its powers. The Druids believed in and taught the efficacy of prayer, but for untold centuries they had gotten far away from the Kindergarten phase, i.e., the phase that modern slang might tag as the “gimmies’” in the small personal and selfish vanity of man. Solomon’s prayer was for wisdom in the broadest sense. Where did he get the notion that wisdom is the most desirable of all things? Listen to this Druidic prayer, and then venture a guess:
“Grant, Oh God, Thy Protection;
And in Protection, Strength;
And in Strength, Understanding;
And in Understanding, Knowledge;
And in Knowledge, the Knowledge of Justice;
And in the Knowledge of Justice, the Love of i
And in that Love, the Love of all Existences;
And in the Love of all Existences, the Love of God
And all Goodness.”
This is a typical prayer of the Druidic religion. Where will we find a loftier longing of the soul for the ultimate Goop? Yet in our popular literature we picture the Briton as a savage whose face was painted with a woad to give him an appearance that would strike terror to the hearts of his enemies. ".

That's an interesting prayer, and yes he's referencing the woad thing again. This is a source that pretty much every historian uses to INFER savages lived in Britain who were like wild animals dressing in animal skins. Light people have never lived this way, obviously, because the traditions with the same names go back to Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, the SAME names of the holy scriptures are found in this artefacts and writings.

"Caius Julius Caesar was the man who first put such notions in writ- ing. How wrong he was! But his writings concerning these people were purely Roman political propaganda for home consumption, i.e., at Rome. Caesar himself knew better, for he was entertained and banqueted at St. Albans and what is now London, and both the Druids and the Bards were present. It is due to the records of the latter that we now know how, when, and where Caesar was entertained. If Caesar considered the British “painted savages,” what could he say concerning modern American women, if he should come back unexpectedly and visit our shores? Druidism was a form of monotheistic religion nearly 1,500 years before the first Roman was born; yet he dared to judge concerning it and condemn something beyond his comprehension. In the main, the popular notion of Druidism is entirely due to the writings of that great ruler.".

Yeah, exactly. That's an interesting point. Caesar banqueted in London back then huh, with druids and bards. Where is this source? REFERENCE SOURCES! If he's right then this adds another nail in the coffin of conventional history of scripture.

This is from the "Celtic Christianity" book.

"From Julius Caesar some useful information is to be gained respecting the religion of the Celts of his own day. He states that they had many gods, the chief of whom, in Gaul at least, answered to the Roman Mercury, patron of arts and crafts. Mars, Apollo, Minerva and Dis Pater were represented in the Celtic system, but it is not easy to equate them satisfactorily. After the Roman conquest the Britons followed the custom of other subject races and iden- tified their gods with those of Olympus. Some of their gods found no corresponding analogue, like Nodens, whose temple overlooked the Severn ; others again were purely local and patronal. During the three centuries while Britain remained a province of the Empire the Romanisation of the native religion had free scope, the spread of Chris- tianity meanwhile striving with indifferent success to keep pace with it. " The larger half of the altars and shrines, discovered in Britain are simply set up to honour the ordinary gods of the Roman world." Among these latter were many strange divinities, who in origin were neither Celtic nor Roman, but were those of alien races led to Britain by the hope of pro- fitable traffic or by compulsory military service. Mithras, for example, whose worship was intro- duced at Rome under the Emperors, found in this way a place in the British pantheon. There is no evidence to show that either nature worship or sun worship was the dominant religion of the Celts either before, during or after the Roman occupation. It is, of course, possible to say of the Romans that they practised both, but it is an abuse of language to say that they were either sun wor- shippers like the Egyptians or nature worshippers like the Phoenicians . The same holds good of the Celts. "

So we've got another reference I found here talking about the Celts relating to what Caesar said and this authors take on it.

"Under Roman influence the days of the week received Latin names derived from the planetary system, all of which except Sunday (Dies Solis which became Dies Dominica) continued to be used by our lawyers until English took the place of Latin in the courts of record. In Cornwall, notwithstanding the Saxon invasion, the Latin names were retained until Cornish ceased to be a spoken and written language. Thus Sunday, Dies Solis became De Zil, Zil being the Cornish derivative of Sol and not a variant of the Cornish word Houl.1 Until the Roman occupation the Celts reckoned time by nights, not days. Thus the first night (of the week if they had weeks) was the sixth night after new moon, that is when the moon was on the point of becoming half-full. Their year, therefore, consisted of thirteen months. The Celtic mind appears to have revelled in the realm of mystery. The practice of magic ; the prevalence of human sacrifice ; the numerous local divinities, with strange names preserved to us only in the dedications of their shrines, whose attributes and powers remain unknown ; the hidden virtues of the mistletoe and the selago ; above all, the secrets of the Celtic priesthood — the Druids — suggest, but un- fortunately only suggest, a religious differentiation which carries us back to a period more remote than that of any religious system with which we are familiar. Professor Sir John Rhys has attempted to show that Druidism was a pre-Celtic survival, the religious system, in short, of some race which preceded the Celts in Britain, and his judgment would doubtless have been accepted had there not been good evidence to show that the system was not peculiar to Britain but to the Celts themselves. It prevailed among the continental Celts just as it prevailed among those of Britain and Ireland. On the other hand, its affinities with classical mythology are not sufficiently pro- nounced at the time when it is first encountered to indicate an JSgean origin. When the original home of the Celt has been determined it may be possible to discover the home of his religion. to The Druids1 were the interpreters of divine things the Celtic conscience. They shared with the knights the administration of public affairs, expounded the ceremonial law and determined the times and modes of its application. Caesar states, but not on good authority, that Druidism originated in Britain, and Tacitus, who lived towards the end of the first century of the Christian era, that Anglesey was its religious centre. An impressive picture is given of the scene (A.D. 60) which was presented to the army of Suetonius Paulinus preparing to attack that venerable sanctuary. " Along the shore was seen a dense line of armed warriors, while women were rush- ing about between the ranks garbed like the Furies, in black gowns, their hair flowing loose, and torches in their hands. The Druids were visible in the rear offering sacrifices to their gods, raising their hands to heaven, and calling down dire imprecations upon the head of the invader."1 Of Druidical worship in Cornwall there is no direct evidence.2 The kinship and intercourse and close relations, however, which subsisted between Cornwall, Wales and Ireland leave no room for doubt that Druidism was its religious system. It should be need- less to observe that its megalithic remains, dolmens, circles, and the like, which were erected many cen- turies before the Celts appeared in Britain, had originally no connection with Druidism and that there is no evidence to show that they ever became identified with it. Without stopping to compare Irish and Gaulish Druidism with that of Britain there is one point which claims attention and which, whethe Druidical or essentially primitive and sporadic, bears witness to the existence of a cult which, occurring in Ireland, could not have been introduced by the Romans. ".

Please pardon the terrible formatting, This text is just bad with copy paste because it's got those old yellow pages. I could put a lot of commentary on this but I need to reference this point once again. The real reason why the so called Juize have the scriptures and claim to follow it is because of John Hyrcanus who went into Edom and converted all the Edomites (which the bible says are who the Pharisees are by the way by inferring what Christ says about who they come from) to follow the law. How did the Pharisees become a power in Jerusalem? It was because of John, who converted them around 130BC. There's coins of this guy existing. Read that history. We carried the tradition before then, because the earliest known time that the Juize had it was through the so called oral traditions of the Talmud which go back to around the 3rd century BC. It doesn't line up perfectly with the timeline but the tradition likely existed in Edomite circles before then. The Maccabees talk about some of this history. The timeline is close enough to what we can interpret given all the surrounding data we have, I mean if Egypt had the tradition and Assyria had it and Babylon had it, then clearly there would've been SOME so called Pharisitical Juize of Edom who carried the oral tradition as COMMENTARY on the Torah and other texts like the Mishnah. So once again, NG claiming that the Juize wrote these texts, I don't buy that. How did the druidic Celts of Britain have this tradition which dates to around the time or even possibly before (can't prove that but it wouldn't surprise me) the Juize had it as the order of Pharisees that are spoken of in scripture. If there's a physical analogy in scriptural then it's likely there was an order of people very similar in the world, especially other notes we have from writings from the time. We could argue that the Juize, are the "lowest consciousness" people on earth, because they PHYSICALLY interpret it PROVEN by the existence of the Talmud, which preaches vile filth about things you shouldn't want to read.

"The origin of the idea, the doctrine, or the longing for a Messiah, or Savior cannot be traced to its origin, for it is found as far back as the history of man can be traced. The Israelites and the Druids were the ones who put it in the most concrete form as a religious tenet. They both believed in the coming of a Messiah who should redeem the people from their sins. The Hebrews typified this idea by a- scapegoat and other emblems that are more or less constant in the Orient.".

We're back to "out of the dust" again. This book has good quotes, but little sources. Opinion is still good though. Also he said what I was just thinking. The "Hebrews" who I'm still assuming he's relating to Juize in this, says they "typified this idea by a scapegoat" AKA a physical savior that doesn't mean they're responsible. It's a bypass of responsibility. Sounds just like the religion of Satanism doesn't it. "I'm not responsible for anything other than my own pleasure".

"The Druids looked for the coming of a “Curer of all Ill,” who was typified in England by the mistletoe, which was identical with the “Branch” of Hebrew proph- ets. Taliesin, the Arch-Druid of early Christian times in England, made the following statement: “Christ, the Word from the beginning, was our Teacher, and we never lost His teachings.” This statement was made many years before the advent of St. Augustine. So -- far as can be traced, there never was a time when the Druids did not hold these doctrines. In order to have a place in which to perform their rituals, at least three great circles were erected in Eng- land. that Each cathedral or circle had 2400 priests, so 100 at a time might sing the praises of God each hour of the 24 without interruption. Over these cathedrals, temples or circles presided one high priest, as cited above. Can the reader determine from whence came the practice of singing Mass?".

Interesting quote, BUT WHERE IS THE SOURCE!? If I'm going to PROVE this then you NEED sources. Is this coming from the "Chronicles" book? I don't know I've not found this quote in there. This next quote is a very interesting one. I'm basically copying the whole chapter at this point, because it's filled with lots of bits.

"Druidism was not known as such by the Druids themselves, but as the STONE RELIGION (Y Maen). This religion had its symbols, its sacred objects, its rituals, and all the paraphernalia that accompanies visual worship. To illustrate: the three golden rays were the symbol of Trinity. This has come down in England to- day, and is typified by the three feathers in the cap of the Prince of Wales. Of course this does not mean that the prince is thus deified; but it is to remind him that he is the Defender of the Faith of his fathers. There were quite a number of sacred objects, among to them being:
(1) the sacred bird, which in England, was the crested wren;
(2) the sacred tree, which in all countries was the oak;
(3) sacred grain, which, again in all countries, was wheat;
(4) sacred plant, mistle- toe, which grows on the oak;
(5) the sacred herbs— the ritual called for the trefoil and hyssop;
(6) and the sacred animal—the white bull, Taurus.
Put these sacred things together in their proper order, and we have the basis of ritual among the Druids. How much of this was handed to them already made, and how much was original with them? When the first apostle of the Christian doctrine, or The Way, as it was then called, visited the shores of the British Isles, he found that the thousands of Druids were already acquainted thoroughly with the doctrine, and needed, in fact, not to be taught. The church was already organized in Britain, and did not come in contact with nor in conflict with the Rome version until the arrival of Augustine. When Paul arrived in England, he found his doc- trine established in parts of the realm, and he preached the Druids in the form they were accustomed to employ; viz: the Triad. The following are some of the Triads attributed to Paul:
I. “There are three sorts of men: the man of God, who renders good for evil; the man of men, who renders good for good and evil; 'and the man of the devil, who renders evil for good.”
IJ. “Three kinds of men are the delight of God: the meek; the lovers of peace; the lovers of mercy.”
III. “There are three marks of the children of God: gentle deportment, pure conscience, patient suffering of injuries.”
IV. “There are three chief duties demanded by God: justice to every man, love, humility.”
V. “In three places the most of God will be found: where He is most sought, where is most loved, where there is least of self.”
Vi. “Three persons have the claims and privileges of brothers and sisters: the widow, the orphan, the stranger.”
If the student carefully reads these, can he not truth- fully say that they have all the identification marks of the pen of Paul? Pauline theology has been a puzzle to the orthodox commentators for centuries. Have we here the key that will ultimately unlock the puzzle? "

That's a very interesting connection I've never considered.

"If the student carefully reads these, can he not truth- fully say that they have all the identification marks of the pen of Paul? Pauline theology has been a puzzle to the orthodox commentators for centuries. Have we here the key that will ultimately unlock the puzzle? When we study the rituals and ceremonies of the Druids, we find them identical in every way with the Mosaic ritual, even to the breastplate of the high priest. When this has been determined, we are compelled to _change our views concerning the means of communication between distant nations and groups of antiquity. We have been taught for the past seventy-five years that the ancients did not communicate with each other as we do today. Perhaps they did not with the same speed; but their communication was constant and vigorous. In this manner the Mosaic ritual was seen trans- ferred to the British Isles. We have not space here to go into detail as to the route by which these ideas were transported; but they did reach England in due time, and were adopted, and somewhat adapted by the descendants of those who were taught by Gardara, who,
by the way—so tradition says—was the first man to compose poetry on the British Isles. When we reduce every evidence to its lowest terms, we are led to the conclusion that Druidism, like Judaism, was a PREPARATION FOR THE GOSPEL. BRITAIN WAS
THE FIRST TO NATIONALLY ACKNOWLEDGE CHRIST AND RECOGNISE HIM AS THE MESSIAH. , AND THE ENGLISH SPEAKING PEOPLES ARE STILL THE FOREMOST RACE ON EARTH SPREADING THE HOLY WORD.".

Oh look at that he's a racist! Lol get over it kid. None of that at the end was capitalized by me by the way, that was his enthusiasm for such a find, just like how I write with passion for the truth. I've done so much study on this for so many years now and I can confidently say that given ALL the data I've found there's actually VERY little that PROVES that so called Juize actually carried the scriptural traditions we read in the modern bible today. The whole thing was carried by us, the light people, literally. The biblical story, physically and otherwise, is written for us, nobody else. These other traditions adopted what we wrote. Did they not? The difference between the work I do here with creating RS and the rest of the stuff out there is, you guessed it, critical thinking and logic, something 99% in LOA lack, because apparently critical thinking shouldn't exist else you'll manifest confusion. Yeah, it IS confusing to generate a solid hypothesis based on data, but that's the point of why challenge exists because this work is VERY difficult but VERY VERY rewarding because then you KNOW things.

"The origin of the cross is lost in antiquity. We know not who, nor when, nor where was made the first cross. Even the original word for the symbol has come down to jus from the time when men began to put their words and thoughts into durable form. It comes from the Sumerian word Garza, which, in the original, means “Scepter or Staff of God.” In its secondary meaning it has the idea of the “Scepter of the King.” From the very beginning it was a religious symbol and had sacred significance. In the beginning it was represented by the intersecting of two lines at right angles, or what is today called the Greek cross. This equilateral cross was undoubtedly symbolical of space, the earth, and the sky. From this simple form evolved the figure known as the swastika, or gammate cross, which, in its simplest form, is represented by the capital letter Z. The earliest significance of this figure was prosperity; it indicates, “good luck.” This early form seems to have originated among the “Aryan” (?) races, i.e., it was first formulated by those who spoke Sanskrit. The two arms that form the swastika are called pramatha, and swastika, and it is associated with fire- worship. The arms turn from left to right—this is the “Good Omen.” This symbol is to be found among all the early civilizations—in Asia, Africa, Europe, and the Americas. Regardless of its origin, shape and design of the cross began to differ as the civilizations began to differentiate. But in some form and in some shape it has existed, and has exerted its influence upon the “progress” of man.".

Ah yes the connection between the cross and Celtic people, and others. Also keep in mind this book was written in 1940, but much of his data was probably in the works some years before, so this "Aryan" connection with swastikas and stuff that the Austrian painter used likely come from the influence of the time. The cross in my opinion means the 4 elements, and the circle in the middle is the substrate of existence, like the symbol for RS.

"The Chinese have a saying that God fashioned the earth in the form of a cross. To represent that idea they placed the cross within a square, indicating thus the four points of the compass. This may be another form of the swastika, or it may be the revolving cross, which in its final analysis is the symbol of Divine Victory. There is another form of the swastika; it turns to the left, and represents the retrograde move- ment of the returning of the victorious sun through the realms of Death, and indicates in the language of symbols nothing more or less than a belief in a coming Resurrection. This is the female swastika, and symbolizes the Resurrecting sun, the sun of Righteous- ness, pent. and at the same time the piercing of the Ser- The serpent plays a prominent part in the early
folklore of the race, and we find the serpent represented as impaled upon one of the arms of the swastika. One such representation is to be found in ancient Briton at Meigle, Forfarshire. "

And now we know why there's 4 spirals angled to the right in the RS logo. Surprise!

"The next oldest form as represented by the relics of man was probably the Egyptian Tau. Originally it was this form: but later there was placed on the top of the transversal an elongated loop, or handle, so that the priest might easily carry it on his forearm by slipping his hand through the loop. This became for the Egyptians. the “Anxu,” and became the symbol of “The Key of the Life to Come.” This symbol we find upon the breastplates of the priest as represented upon the monuments 4,000 B.c. This proves to the archaeologist that the Egyptians had a deep and abiding belief in life after death, and that the future life was their entered by means of or through the cross. In England, the Druids held the oak as a sacred tree, under whose branches they were accustomed to hold services—excepting that these particular trees had no branches to cast shade, for the trees had been trimmed of all branches excepting two, one on each side of the trunks directly opposite each other, thus forming a cross. When we study carefully and extensively the symbols relating to religion found upon the monuments of Egypt, we get quite close to their original belief in God. We were taught by the college and university instructors that the Egyptians were polytheistic to the nth degree, that they had hundreds of gods and goddesses which they worshipped. The archaeologist must now candidly contradict that thesis. These many gods were simply the personifications of the various attributes of the One God, whom they called Amen Ra, the King of gods. In their hymns we find these pas- sages dedicated to Amen Ra: “Thou art the Lord of Heaven, the Lord of the earth,” etc., for many stanzas. These hymns are found in the so-called “Egyptian Book of the Dead,” which was brought to Egypt before the First Dynasty. From whence it came, and who brought it, is at the present time not known; but some day archaeology will tell us. "

Right there. All different ATTRIBUTES. THIS IS FIXED FUNCTION ALCHEMY WHICH IS WHAT I TEACH. There are all these COMPONENTS of consciousness and the Egyptians divided them into personified elements that interact and overlap to manifest that psychological function. ALL THESE FOOLS BELIEVE THAT THE BIBLE IS TEACHING MENTALISM BUT THAT'S ALL COMPLETE TRASH!!! This irrefutably proves that over and over. There's no solipsism in the ancient world, that a new invention. Isn't it funny. This book was written in 1940, and this guy knew all these alchemical functions before NG was publishing his books. That's no surprise, NG wasn't unique or special or receive some complete understanding of scripture. All of those people need to get SCHOOLED! There's mountains of data which refute what NG preaches, and this is one of them. We're talking about FIXED FUNCTION ALCHEMY, which again, NG did preach near the end IN VERY LIMITED DEGREES, but I don't consider that part of his doctrine because what he taught for the most part was simply getting over your trash and psychologically transforming pressure, as I've irrefutably proven through all the study I've done here. There's nothing special or different about what NG preaches, he only really talks about practically that imagining is A WAY of experiencing transformation THROUGH FEELING (the reality of experience) AND OR suggestion. That's it really. Is that right?

"Archaeology will tell us. ‘The Creed of the Egyptians can be easily put into this form:
(1) the belief in the immortality of the soul;
(2) belief in the continued existence of the heart- soul;
(3) belief in the transmutation of offerings;
(4) belief in the efficacy of words of power (prayer) ;
(5) belief in the physical resurrection of the body
(that is why they so carefully mummified the deceased,
and so carefully hid the mummy away in order that
it might not be disturbed through time);
(6) belief in a Judgment Day when the good would be awarded with everlasting happiness and the wicked with utter and irretrievable annihilation. That was the Egyptian Creed and Belief. Now let us place beside it the Christian Creed and Belief in outline:
(1) Redemption;
(2) the promise of Eternal Life;
(3) Resurrection;
(4) Judgment Day when the “Saved” shall receive their rewards according to the deeds done in the body, and the wicked and rebellious against God shall go to their Eternal Punishment to pay for the sins done in the body. The symbol of the Egyptian Belief was the Cross; the symbol of the Christian Belief is the Cross. If the Bible did not relate the story of the Fall of Man, the archaeologist would and could write the story independently of Holy Writ. As soon as man got out of direct contact with God, he fell, and began his long toboggan journey to the depth of degradation. At that point God inaugurated a plan of Redemption, means by which man could, if he would, climb back to the original position that God had made for him. The Christians of today keep the Sacrament in remembrance” of the Plan of Redemption, but the ancients kept it in anticipation of a Messiah who would redeem them. This ritual rapidly degenerated, in some parts of the world and in some civilizations, into human sacrifice as a substitute for the anticipatory Sacrament. This debasement was displaced by burnt offerings by Abraham and his descendants. Thus began, before Abraham, the darkness that blotted spiritually out of the consciousness of many nations. Regeneration was confused with reproduction; the resurrection with the regrowth of vegetation; and the Sun thus became a solar deity. "

I don't think that's 100% correct but it's close enough. I don't agree with his next statements about the winged disks and stuff so I won't bother mentioning them here.

"These were not, as the laity thought, mere representation of the sun, but they were, as the ‘priests well knew, the physical representation of Deity in abstract.. All these symbols had a two-way aspect:
(1) an historical connotation;
(2) they turned the eyes of the worshipper to the future in hope and faith—to the hope and faith that a Messiah would ultimately come to redeem mankind. ".

"The Cross, to the Christian Churches, is the symbol of Atonement already accomplished for those who are willing to accept; so did these ancient Crosses hold out the hope of coming Atonement. As a matter of fact, the Egyptians knew the exact date that the Atonement would take place. They fixed this date as the 3,226th year of the vice-regency of Thoth. This period began in 3196 B.c., as one mathematician and astronomer has calculated it, and ended 30 a.p. Now according to latest and most authentic calculations regarding the Crucifixion, it did occur in 30 a.p. ".

Don't know if that's accurate, but it's to consider.

"It was during the fourth century that the Church openly adopted the cross as its major symbol. At that time the Christians were perfectly safe, for the Em- peror Constantine had proclaimed Christianity the State religion of the whole civilized world. At this point in history Helena, the mother of Con- stantine, though she was very old (in her 80th year),
asked her son for the privilege of going to the Holy Land to attempt to identify some of the holy and sacred spots in that part of the Empire. The son readily granted his mother that privilege. She went to fulfill her self-imposed task. The first spot that she attempted to the identify was the place of the nativity of Jesus. This she did by identifying the cave over which she built the Church of the Nativity. She had great fore- sight, or divine guidance, for it is the tradition of Catholic Church and the consensus of Biblical
archaeologists that she found the actual cave in which Jesus was born on the 15th of Tizri, i.e., October 4th, as our calendar now stands. By the way, this day was Sabbath (Saturday), if astronomical calculations be correct. The next thing that Empress Helena did was to see if she could possibly locate the cross upon which Jesus had been executed, for she knew that it was the Roman Law that the cross of an executed man must be buried deeply in the vicinity of the site of execution. At first she was balked in every-direction as she essayed to accomplish her mission. Knowing that it was illegal to crucify within the walls of the city, she must look for Calvary outside of the walls. There were many problems, among them those caused by the destruction carried out by Titus in 70 a.p. and the later rebuilding of the city as it was at the time of her visit, in the year 326 A.D. She understood these problems, and did her best to solve them. The story goes that through the aid of the Bishop of . Jerusalem, St. Macarius, a very aged Jew was discovered who knew,: through the teachings of his forebears, the exact spot where the Cross of Jesus had been buried after His execution. The old man said the cross lay buried beneath the Temple of Venus which Hadrian, two centuries before, had built over Calvary and the tomb of Joseph of Arimathea as a heathen protest against Christianity. Helena had this temple completely demolished (this is actual history) in order to clear the ground for the search. The first discovery made after the temple was demolished was the tomb of Joseph of Arimathea, and then, near it, the three crosses. But now the question arose as to which of the three was THE Cross. One tradition says that Helena solved this puzzle by having a sick woman touch all three in turn. When she touched the real Cross she was instantly healed. Another tradition has it that she had a dead man brought and laid upon the crosses. When he was laid upon the genuine cross, the dead man instantly came to life. These are the traditions, and not substantiated by documents. Close to the Cross were found four iron nails that had nailed the Christ to the Cross; also the superscription written by Pilate and fastened to the cross over the head of Jesus. Helena built a church over the sepulchre, believing that she was building it over the actual tomb from which Jesus arose that first Easter morn. ".

I can't verify ANY of this, and this is the kind of stuff that you read in these types of books with no sources and you can't verify any of the facts there. Thing is, if that's the case, and there was a historical Jesus Christ with this crazy history, then why did Josephus have forged passages and likely other passages too? I will go out and say that most apocryphal texts written after the NT are fake, and stand by that. The only apocrypha that's considered real to me would be the book of Enoch and probably Jasher. The Maccabees has real history in it that's well documented, so that's something, and yet we're told by NG that it's ALL allegory. What a joke.

"Now, reader, you are inclined to ask: Does this church actually mark the spot where the Cross of Christ stood, and is the Holy Sepulchre the one from which Jesus arose? We must answer that present-day Archaeologists believe that the Church of the Holy Sepulchre does Nor mark Calvary, or the tomb of Joseph of Arimathea. It is the opinion of most scientists that the actual tomb is just outside of the present Damascus Gate. If this be true, how account for the present church? If we know the history of the city, it is not difficult to account for the error if there be one. In the first place the Church may be upon the right site, for archaeologists have thought very strongly that the wall in the time of Jesus did not run where the wall now is built, and that the site of the Church may have been outside of the walls. The correct location of the tomb depends entirely upon the question of the location of the city wall in the time of the Savior. Personally, if I may offer my humble word, I believe that the tomb of Joseph of Arimathea lies outside the Gate of Damascus. Then the question arises: How can that be true? We must reply that the city and its buildings have been destroyed several times since Helena built the church. Is it not possible that, in the several processes of rebuilding, the original site was lost, and the new structures placed in the vicinity of the original structure? Let me say that the whole question can be answered by conjecture only. We may know some time, but we do not know definitely at present. ".

Smart conclusion. I'd say the same. We don't know. We need DATA. I also want to make sure we understand here. This author (J O Kinnaman) believes that the alchemical tradition also includes a physical history along side the allegory, which I'm also inclined to believe as well, since there IS physical history there, IRREFUTABLY, but the question is how much? So the point is, he believes that the Celts and druidic traditions and even the Egyptians and all that did all these things to represent the coming of a physical messiah, to fulfil the prophesies of the OT. I believe that's correct ON ONE LEVEL, but the coming of the messiah is also about inner alchemy and transformation and marriage too. Remember God divorced Israel, and then Christ came to marry Israel again. That's the story. This represents the substances coming into overlap and splitting and overlapping again. That's what this actually means. Physically speaking it manifests as the supposed history of the bible.

"In THE beginning, the followers of the “The Way,” Christianity was first called, had a very hard, and difficult way. They were outlaws and outcasts in the eyes of the Roman law, and of the mass of the Roman people. “The Way’ was a hard and persecuted way. The believers had to meet in secret places at untoward times. The Christians were hunted like wild beasts, hounded, and sometimes killed upon sight. They did not build places of worship openly as was later done, but sought out the most secret, remote places that could be found. There was no definite organization, at least known to the public, yet what organization there was maintained the secrecy of a lodge, with pass-words, grips, etc. "

Interesting take. I still believe that many so called secret societies are founded on these principles.

"In the eyes of the Roman law, this organization was exceedingly dangerous to the Roman Government. The Government held that this cult sought the overthrow of organized society, and therefore was an enemy of all mankind. This was the attitude of the Government and the mass of the people. "

Yeah we know that. Tacitus, IF his writings are real, and the others, will reflect the Christians being a menace, BUT THE THING IS HE WROTE THAT THERE WERE "an immense multitude was convicted" AND NOT A SECRET UNDERGROUND SECT. This is why I believe it was forged, mostly. It doesn't make sense to me that there would've been a huge uprising in Rome for this cause. The so called Jewish revolts and such would've happened anyway because of tensions between the groups. Christ physically being there or not is irrelevant.

"Christianity was organized in Rome long before Paul arrived there. The story of the crucifixion of Jesus had been carried to the very palace of the Emperor Nero by the Roman Centurion who was the Captain of the Guard that surrounded the cross upon that fatal day. This officer left the record scored in the plaster of the wall of the Guard Room of the Golden House of Nero, and it can still be seen there, intact, just as it was written. These hunted, harrassed followers of “THE Way” sought places where they would be out of the reach of the law. There was one such place—the place we now call a cemetery. But there were no cemeteries which were not occupied by the countless dead in the time of the Roman Republic. However, there were the deserted and abandoned stone quarries, that were like great channels beneath the city of Rome. These the followers of “Tue Way” appropriated to their own use, converted into columbaria, or burial places. After burial had been begun in these galleries, they took the name of Catacombs, which is a Latinized Greek word that means “hollow,” or “by the hollow.”".

Where's the source of this? It sounds like an inference based on Tacitus and his notes about Nero going after Christians, which is still possibly a forge. So this point is up in the air. The main reason why it's said that Tacitus is a forge with his Christus quote once again is because it's not quoted by ANY other known works until the 15th century. It's also sus because it says that there were "immense multitudes" of Christians. That's unlikely, though if Christ DID physically perform miracles and lots of people knew about "the way" that was taught by him and such then obviously there WOULD be immense multitudes but I doubt that it would've taken decades to reach a point of critical mass because the tradition would've been almost entirely oral. Why did they not riot when Christ was physically killed? Why not? Why wait so long if that's the height of inspiration to revolt. I personally believe that it's a forge for many reasons, but I can't prove that 100%, and neither can the other side.

"In the burial places of the dead, the Christians could gather without fear of interruption by the law. Thus these catacombs became the first churches of the new sect, and the Christians proceeded to beautify the walls and ceilings of these galleries, and thus arose the first Christian Art, most of which can still be seen. Where the galleries crossed either at right angles or otherwise, altars were set up and the rituals of the church performed. "

These are some good points actually. Decorated catacombs are well known, though once again I want sources. I have no doubt this is correct, but still. Most of the Christian symbolism in the catacombs according to my quick study goes back to around the 3rd-5th century AD.

"Here in this Catacomb, for the first time, the power of death was denied, for there is an inscription that reads: “accersitus ab angelis,” which translated is: “summoned by angels.”
Christianity had its first home in the Catacombs, the home of the dead; but the followers of “The Way” of said that death is NoT death, but a sleep. Lucian says of them: “The poor creatures have persuaded them- selves that they will live forever.” Among the oldest of the Catacombs is that of Pris- cilla on the Via Salaria Nova. It dates to the time the Apostles, as do four others. It was in this catacomb that the sarcophagus of the daughter of St. Peter was found. Her name was Petronilla, and the inscriptions tell us who she was. While Lucian, the Roman writer, makes light of the belief and inscriptions carved by the Christians, they had one word that appears the most often in their in- scriptions in the catacombs, and that word is “spes”— “HOPE.” ".

Cool stuff.

"This law must, of necessity, be circumvented, and this was accomplished by the old, old trick of using symbols that only the “elect” could interpret. Thus Christianity, in the beginning, was a secret society. These were the originals of the later great basilicas such as St. Agnese, St. Paola, and many others. Later the name basilica was changed to cathedral, which we still use. ".

Yeah that's what I was saying before. Makes sense, to some level at least.

"When we come to identify the oldest individual catacomb of them all, we are compelled to say that it is the catacomb of Domatilla, and was made by her for her own use. This lady was the daughter-in-law of the Lord Mayor of Rome, the man who tried St. Paul in his second trial. Paul did not plead his case but, as before Agrippa, the Apostle tried with all] his power to convert the Mayor to Christianity: and he did become a Christian, but not while Paul lived. The Mayor, Titus Flavius Sabinus, with all his family, became Christians, and suffered martyrdom. The cata- comb of Domatilla is the oldest of the Christian cata- combs, and her sarcophagus is the oldest known Chris- tian coffin. ".

Proof? WHERE'S THE SOURCES? This is too detailed to not have sources. To me it sounds like inference based on surrounding data, which DOES make sense, but this detail here about these specific people and time periods and such require sources.

"After burial had become an established custom and the catacombs had come to seem like home to the Christians, they began to beautify the galleries in various ways. Certain ceremonies and rituals being denied to them by means of speech, they avoided transgressing the law by the use of symbols. These symbols all meant something deep and occult to those who were — initiated into the secret of them. For illustration: the faithful soul was typified by the lamb and the dove; the symbol of the Christ, was the fish, as well as the Greek letter “chi” (X); the diametrically opposite of Christ, Evil, was designated with the symbol of the serpent; and Eternity was represented by the peacock. It was a short step from the representing by symbols to art in the form of mural paintings. ".

"Now let us remember that the Hebrews (Jews) never produced art in any form whatsoever. Christian Art had its origin where art, as we know it, began and continued to flourish, i.e., with the Greeks. The first to inquire regarding the teachings of Jesus were Greeks, and the first to pro- duce any art that is now called Christian were Greeks. Here in the catacombs the Greek artists produced the first Christian murals. ".

Funny. No "Jew" made any art. It was all us. I still disagree with him on the whole Juu thing about them being Hebrews. Three's a ton of extra history in the pages to come that's VERY detailed but I can't prove any of this stuff because there's no sources or anything and it's really not relevant to what we're exploring here so.

"But after the Invader had passed on his way, Christianity came from the cemetery, no longer forced to remain in hiding, and adapted and transformed one of the Classical Temples of Rome into The First Chris- tian Church in Italy. This church was lately found out on the Via Corso, and it is now called by the Archaeologist The First Church of Rome. But this was not the first church above ground in at the world. This honor must go to the ““Wattled Church” Glastonbury, Avalon, England. ".

Riiight the Glastonbury church again. Avalon. When is this dated and are there any aftefacts? Well that king Arthur book might have some I've not found yet.

"On his way to Rome, Ignatius wrote some letters of which there are more than ten existing today. Eusebius, a historian of the first half of the fourth century, collected seven which he set forth in his history. Seven of the letters Ignatius wrote on board ship on his way to Rome are mentioned by St. Jerome, and are considered some of the most sacred possessions of the church. In addition to these seven, Ignatius wrote two to St. John, which are still in existence. Then he wrote a letter to Mary, the mother of Jesus. Of course, he did not write this letter while on his way to Rome, but years before. Mary relayed it to the churchman, and her letter is still in existence. Of course, I am aware there are adverse critics who challenge the gen- uineness of these letters, such as Zahn and Lightfoot; but these critics have only one object: to discredit the Bible and, if possible, the history of the church. On the other hand, we have many scholarly experts who believe these letters to be exactly what they purport to be. I may not be an epistolary expert, but I am per- fectly willing to take the word of those who are so fitted.” : Of course, Ignatius could not have written the final scene in the Coliseum. Who did write it? The answer must be that Polycarp wrote the story of the final scenes. Also we have sundry passages in the work of Irenaeus, one of the Church Fathers. Polycarp wrote to the Philippians regarding the life work of Ignatius, and thus he became a “source” of information. Poly- carp stands like the rock of Gibraltar in Church history, for he stands as the link between the Apostles and the early church. He was born in 69 a.p., the year that Nero committed suicide, and was followed by three different emperors within the year, about the time of the martyrdom of St. Paul. He died long after the events which he writes of Ignatius, during the year 155 a.p. The Apostolic Age ended in Rome about the year 69 a.D., or the year in which Polycarp was born, and the year of the death of the last of the real Caesars. The “sub-Apostolic Age” closed with the death of St. Clement. _ In Asia the Apostolic Age ended with the death of St. John, during the year 100 a.v. The sub- Apostolic Age closed in Asia with the martyrdom of Polycarp, February 155 a.p. Polycarp was appointed Bishop by St. John. Thus it is possible to trace the history of the church, without a break, directly back to the contemporaries of Christ. ".

Well, I have more source digging to do. Thing is he mentions Eusebius. I've dug into this guy quite a bit. I'll reference his quotes again here. Eusebius who tried to prove Christianity was historical said "They possess also short works by early writers, the founders of their sect, who left many specimens of the allegorical method, which they take as their models, following the system on which their predecessors worked." as well as "It seems likely that Philo wrote this after listening to their exposition of the Holy Scriptures, and it is very probable that what he calls short works by their early writers were the gospels, the apostolic writings, and in all probability passages interpreting the old prophets, such as are contained in the Epistle to the Hebrews and several others of Paul’s epistles.". This means that the early church must've been allegorical alchemical? If Eusebius here is talking about how the OT "Christian" (salvation) doctrine has been around for ages then clearly we understand that Eusebius understood much of biblical symbolism. It seems what we're discovering here more or less is that the original Christians knew that the bible was more than just history but also allegory. Makes me want to cross reference like 3 other books and study a figure named Origen of Alexandria, who wrote some very interesting things. I mean you have got to be a buffoon to say the bible is ENTIRELY allegorical symbolic. That's just unbelievably ignorant and I will continue to call a spade a spade for what it is. NG.

Origen taught that there was a physical historical interpretation, a sort of moral level, and then the allegory of alchemy. He viewed it as a multi level doctrine that had basis in more than one way of reading it, which I agree with. Keep in mind Origen is from 2nd-3rd century and was WAY ahead of his time. I need to study this guys work more because I've not done super deep study on him yet. NG with his idea of the imagination being mental is a joke, though practically what he taught, is impossible to work with imaginal senses, His real doctrine was that your psyche manifests, but that's lost and forgotten, and arguably not even really what he taught if you take his words at face value, though through basic logic you can figure out it's not imaginal senses because the imaginal senses don't "feel" since they're sensory, it's the reality of experience, and he said quote exactly that the "technique has no power WHATSOEVER" and that it's all what's implied that has the power, AKA the reality of experience AKA moving currents through your circuits to activate desired psychological functions. This is how I coach, I work with this alchemy, which by the way RARELY involves giving someone an imaginal scene. Sometimes I do but usually it's about processes that expand substance supply so spontaneous insight can arise, which it VERY OFTEN DOES IF SOMEONE DOES THE WORK.

I should study Origen of Alexandria and Eusebius more because both view scripture as both history and alchemy. That's what was taught for millennia, obviously. It was OBVIOUSLY not ALL allegory. Thing is, DID Christ physically exist? Well, I BELIEVE he did, but I can't PROVE he did using irrefutable data from sources that DIRECTLY demonstrate his existence, though considering the impact his story had and how the bible is partly based on real history then it wouldn't surprise me if there was a historical Christ, but you'd need to make lots of inference to make that work, obviously. There's evidence for and against, and just because we can see forged texts that doesn't also mean he didn't exist.

If I can prove that Christ DID exist, despite all the contrasting proof, then I believe I can come out swinging hard against NG and PROPERLY replace his GARBAGE model of manifesting, because let's be real, it offers next to nothing above common sense "go all the way" to manifest. EVERYBODY who claims they understand what he wrote is full of it, they're ALL alchemically illiterate, as you should know by now and that should be ACCEPTED instead of fought against since it's so obviously true. His doctrine offers little to nothing of value over what already existed way before he wrote a single word on paper, because he has minimal value on alchemical transformation nor on functional psychological processes. His interpretation of scripture is ALWAYS THE SAME POINT. Believe in imagination. IS THIS NOT TRUE? WHERE'S THE DEPTH? He seems to claim that ALL the stories end up in the same lesson, trust imagination, as though it's the imaginal senses. Don't you think it's VERY disingenuous to teach "imagination is God" when that's NOT TRUE! Nobody would grasp that imagination is NOT the imaginal senses, when that's ACTUALLY the LOGIC HE HIMSELF USES WHEN HE DEFINES WHAT THESE THINGS MEAN! Why do you expect me to go easy on such a guy, seriously. WHY? His doctrine is EXTREMELY limited in scope, and YES there is SOME value there but again it's just the same lessons you'd find anywhere else. Faith in imaginal senses has NEVER been taught in ANY school of thought EVER because that's COMPLETE SOLIPSISTIC MENTALISTIC TRASH! Is this not true? Mentalism is a cancer that should be killed off, because it's the anti scriptural truth, denying fixed functions. His doctrine is interpreted by a vast majority of people to be this thing about imaginal scenes that are real to you manifest. Is this not true? Yet they DON'T GET the underlying functions HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THE IMAGINAL SENSES AND HE ADMITTED THIS! He said the IMPLICATION is where the power is, AKA the "feeling" of current in your circuits WHICIH IS THE REALITY OF EXPERIENCE AND IS IMAGINATION AND IS GOD! What else can it be? Nothing else. That's what is missing in his doctrine and I am probably the only person in the entire LOA space to understand this and talk about it on YT. That last video got lots of dislikes by the way, interestingly enough, even though it would help you manifest everything you desire if you follow exactly what I said, as has been proven by my clientele who apply this on the regular and get places.

Can I just make something clear. This whole "know that you are I AM" idea and how that's somehow about "the feeling" CANNOT deny that when that "insight" comes AKA you're sensing intuitive impulse of a recognition of something, be it a truth or a movement, it will be a SOMATIC sensation, unconscious/subconscious/earth/water element playing out. Your field geometry ACTIVATES, current is felt. ANY feeling is a sensation of current, meridians activating and a corresponding thematic psychological sensation follows. This is irrefutable objective fact that nobody ever has or ever will deny as reality. This is the ENTIRE explanation of I AM. Your field geometry as a microcosm of reality, God, has all the components that correspond on the external within you, and thus the psychological functions exist to unfold through you when they're in supply. The feeling is to get you to mediate pressure AKA ratios of volume of activating current within the circuits to become proportionate so that supply can be attained, NOTHING ELSE. Whenever someone has success, that mechanism works, that's why. THAT'S THE ONLY REASON. Suggestion through clarity, and it also explains EVERY example of these seeming contradictory success stories because what to someone if felt more as an activating yang current to bring more scattering energy to a meridian will be someone else who needs anchoring yin current, which most need. It's ALWAYS about yin yang balance, AT BASELINE, for unconscious clarity AKA the felt sense operates coherently and unfolds THROUGH you. Explaining this clear fact seems to fall on deaf ears, even for people I've spent 20+ hours with. It's no difficult to understand.

"Helena, the emperor's mother (from whose name having made Drepanum, once a village, a city, the emperor called it Helenopolis), being divinely directed by dreams went to Jerusalem. Finding that which was once Jerusalem, desolate 'as a Preserve for autumnal fruits,' according to the prophet, she sought carefully the sepulchre of Christ, from which he arose after his burial; and after much difficulty, by God's help she discovered it. What the cause of the difficulty was I will explain in a few words. Those who embraced the Christian faith, after the period of his passion, greatly venerated this tomb; but those who hated Christianity, having covered the spot with a mound of earth, erected on it a temple to Venus, and set up her image there, not caring for the memory of the place. This succeeded for a long time; and it became known to the emperor's mother. Accordingly she having caused the statue to be thrown down, the earth to be removed, and the ground entirely cleared, found three crosses in the sepulchre: one of these was that blessed cross on which Christ had hung, the other two were those on which the two thieves that were crucified with him had died. With these was also found the tablet of Pilate, on which he had inscribed in various characters, that the Christ who was crucified was king of the Jews. Since, however, it was doubtful which was the cross they were in search of, the emperor's mother was not a little distressed; but from this trouble the bishop of Jerusalem, Macarius, shortly relieved her. And he solved the doubt by faith, for he sought a sign from God and obtained it. The sign was this: a certain woman of the neighborhood, who had been long afflicted with disease, was now just at the point of death; the bishop therefore arranged it so that each of the crosses should be brought to the dying woman, believing that she would be healed on touching the precious cross. Nor was he disappointed in his expectation: for the two crosses having been applied which were not the Lord's, the woman still continued in a dying state; but when the third, which was the true cross, touched her, she was immediately healed, and recovered her former strength. In this manner then was the genuine cross discovered. The emperor's mother erected over the place of the sepulchre a magnificent church, and named it New Jerusalem, having built it facing that old and deserted city. There she left a portion of the cross, enclosed in a silver case, as a memorial to those who might wish to see it: the other part she sent to the emperor, who being persuaded that the city would be perfectly secure where that relic should be preserved, privately enclosed it in his own statue, which stands on a large column of porphyry in the forum called Constantine's at Constantinople. I have written this from report indeed; but almost all the inhabitants of Constantinople affirm that it is true. Moreover the nails with which Christ's hands were fastened to the cross (for his mother having found these also in the sepulchre had sent them) Constantine took and had made into bridle-bits and a helmet, which he used in his military expeditions. The emperor supplied all materials for the construction of the churches, and wrote to Macarius the bishop to expedite these edifices. When the emperor's mother had completed the New Jerusalem, she reared another church not at all inferior, over the cave at Bethlehem where Christ was born according to the flesh: nor did she stop here, but built a third on the mount of his Ascension. So devoutly was she affected in these matters, that she would pray in the company of women; and inviting the virgins enrolled in the register of the churches to a repast, serving them herself, she brought the dishes to table. She was also very munificent to the churches and to the poor; and having lived a life of piety, she died when about eighty years old. Her remains were conveyed to New Rome, the capital, and deposited in the imperial sepulchres."

This is the original source material from Socrates Scholasticus - Church History dated to 439AD. This is actually where the idea that the cross of Christ was found. Scholars consider this mythos, but I doubt that. I will study this source more and try to understand its history. Perhaps there's valid refutation other than just "myth" because when someone says that as a debunk I usually take it seriously, because myth is just the most lazy cop out excuse.

Can't find a reliable way of proving this source. There are other references though which provide some kind of answer as vague as this is. This is Earl Doherty:

"In all the Christian writers of the first century, in all the devotion they display about
Christ and the new faith, not one of them ever expresses the slightest desire to see the
birthplace of Jesus, to visit Nazareth his home town, the sites of his preaching, the
upper room where he held his Last Supper, the tomb: where he was buried and rose
from the dead. These places are never mentioned! Most of all, there is not a hint of
pilgrimage to Calvary itself, where humanity’s salvation was consummated. How
could such a place not have been turned into a shrine? Is it conceivable that Paul
would not have wanted to run to the hill of Calvary, to prostrate himself on the sacred
ground that bore the blood of his slain Lord? Surely he would have shared such an
intense emotional experience with his readers! Would he not have been drawn to the
Gethsemane garden, where Jesus was reported to have passed through the horror
and the self-doubts that Paul himself had known? Would he not have gloried in
standing before the empty tomb, the guarantee of his own resurrection? Is there
indeed, in this wide land so recently filled with the presence of the Son of God, any
holy place at all, any spot of ground where that presence still lingers, hallowed by the
step, touch or word of Jesus of Nazareth? Neither Paul nor any other first century
letter writer breathes a whisper of any such thing. ".

He also says about another topic,

"Before Ignatius, not a single reference to Pontius Pilate, Jesus’ executioner, is to be
found. Ignatius is also the first to mention Mary; Joseph, Jesus’ father, nowhere
appears. The earliest reference to Jesus as any kind of a teacher comes in 1 Clement,
just before Ignatius, who himself seems curiously unaware of any of Jesus’ teachings.
To find the first indication of Jesus as a miracle worker, we must move beyond
Ignatius to the Epistle of Barnabas. "

That's why I also believe Barnabas is a bust, yet the Celtic Christian texts that are written often cite his work as credible. I doubt that. This mess of webs to find the facts is such a task. The story of Helena in my opinion, having been written by a so called church father who's also named "Socrates" is fake too. I can't prove that using this story. If you think it's credible then have fun. We have to be objective. What I will say is that there is pretty close to what I could consider proof of a Christian LIKE doctrine, specifically OT type alchemy, existing in Britain before Rome showed up, and in places way before then which taught the same stuff. I believe this is what we can reliably prove to be pretty sure of the fact.

"There is not a single existing site in Jerusalem which is mentioned in connection with
Christian history before 326, when Helena (Mother of Constantine) saw a cave that
had just been excavated, and which was identified with Jesus’ tomb.".

That's from "the Christ conspiracy" referencing George Wells as the author of that quote, who is a "professor of German and rationalist". What a whacked title to have. Rationalist.

More quotes from the Christ conspiracy "St. Augustine, along with Origen, was forceful in his pronouncement of Genesis as allegory: There is no way of preserving the literal sense of the first chapter of Genesis, without impiety, and attributing things to God unworthy of him.". Remember, Origen was someone who had alchemical understanding.

Gal 4:24 Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar.

Can't refute this. Galatians literally opens this passage with "this is allegory". Well I guess that proves the NT isn't all fake then. I never caught that.

"The use of important stones as witnesses to oaths is an old custom that goes back to the Bible. In Genesis it is said that Jacob raised his Pillow Stone to bear witness to a covenant with God. In Wales people often took oaths whilst sitting on the grave of an important ancestor; where this was not practicable, their memorial stones served a similar purpose. In the same vein, British monarchs, even today, take their coronation vows whilst sitting on a throne containing the Stone of Scone, other- wise known as the ‘Stone of Destiny’ and believed by many to be the original ‘Jacob’s Pillow Stone’.’ Jack Cade’s striking of the London Stone seems to have been done for a similar purpose. ".

This is from "The holy Kingdom". Interesting point I've heard about once before. The stone of Scone. Some claim that this is because the monarchs to this day all have this in their coronation ceremony which somehow proves that Christ was physical. It more or less proves that the British have far more to do with the origins of Christianity than anywhere else. I also want to make something clear here. I do not believe that the critics who say that "just because nothing was written in the 1st century" or whatever don't want to accept the fact that Christian doctrine clearly was an import from Britain. It was relatively underground and I believe that if there were writings like they'd expect to be around aren't recognizing the possibility that it was oral up in Britain with the kinds of talks they'd expect to have happen. We've been over this before about how it really couldn't have been possible for "immense multitudes" to have been following Christianity back then, because we already know that there was historically a lot of activity in the catacombs in the 1st and 2nd century which reveals to us that it's unlikely there was much in the way of people in Rome following Christianity. I don't believe that the miracles Christ performed were physically observed by masses of people either, no matter how you look at that I believe EVEN IF he did those and physically was there he would've made these miracles occur to only the chosen people who would overlap his subconscious field and experience these things, but I still doubt that too.

All of the physically based evidence points to the Christian doctrine being moved to Britain and the Celtic druids picked up on that and followed along with it. That's still my hypothesis since the start which hasn't changed based since the start having cross referenced probably 30 different texts now at least with many individual sources. There's no way you can really prove Jesus physically was doing what the NT claims he did, and again, if he did physically exist, which once again I still believe he did, then he would've taught alchemy to a handful of people and that then migrated to Britain where it continued before Rome seized the opportunity to deceive the whole world with the trash that's around now with Catholicism. I've been through so much data. It's like I'm at that point again where I don't think it's worth to dig deeper to attempt to prove physical NT accurate Jesus because I just don't see it. It's LIKELY he existed, not just because the alchemist says he did, but also because there's the foundations of alchemy that's in the OT and that there's proof of druids being involved with this in the Welsh traditions and such we've gone over.

I also wanted to write about the Juuish elites, who live without a sense of responsibility to anyone else. One thing we can pretty clearly also conclude is this. The white race carried the scriptures over the world and were the ones with this enlightenment in the beginning. Can't see how that's inaccurate. All the data points to this being the case, because Juize have taken it TOTALLY backwards in the Talmud, almost by design. I believe that the Juize at the top VERY likely know this, and play to their roles and fully be uncompromising in ruining everything good in this world like well functioning parasites do.

I also want to mention I've gone over some key doctrine in what Origen teaches vs NG and they are similar in many ways but Origen still lacks deep alchemical understanding about scripture. Origen I actually disagree with more than NG to be honest, when I study what he said much closer. He still believes there will be a physical return of Christ, which I've also considered, but the thing is that if we can't prove Christ physically existed as he is described in the NT doing miracles (which WOULD'VE been written about for sure in other texts other than Josephus) so how can we be sure he will return physically as is described too. If the most likely answer that Christ was an alchemist teaching the initiates either physically or spiritually for that time then that means he's already here. As far as I know the alchemist wouldn't say he's returning physically either. To me the resurrection is the point at which the Christ child is fully submerged in the overlap of the 7 core archetypal powers and has been therefore transformed from the Christ child and "sacrificed", like how Odin died to himself, meaning the lesser yang dies which in the lesser conjugation had the baseline level of operation moved closer to air but now it's gone from lower air all the way up to the top of heaven and now is about to be conjugated with the higher genius. The marriage supper (the effect of the greater conjugation of earth and air through lesser fire and water being taken up into those elements and transformed through the 7 archetypal powers being integrated under pressure) reprints what seems to be the greater conjugation having been complete where he dines with the saints in heaven at the top of air to celebrate the work being complete. What else could it mean? That's my best guess right now. ANY mention of marriage, or even sexuality of any form referenced, relates to states overlapping 100% of the time, because that's what it is. It means you're taking a lesser state (a lower degree of function THAT'S YOUR CURRENT BASELINE (IMPORTANT POINT!) and evaporating that up into a higher order state which transforms it because "purification" IS exposure to illuminating starlight LITEARLLY) and elevating it up into a higher one which burns the lower out fully. You can't go back, hence you're married, AKA bound. The structure changes, and the birth that happens is the product. The Christ child is the manifestation of the product of the lesser conjugation, as far as I know. You do the whole inner alchemy process all over again when you reach the lesser conjugation to attain the greater conjugation. Christ wrapped in swaddling clothes means you're wrapped in a lower state, instead of the "robe of glory". The quality of garments in the bible determines the level of function that personified child is at, and in the case of the greater conjugation, it's Christ putting on the robe of glory or merging earth with air, the star father also can represent the empowered air element that's been fully grown up. Growing into a state, maturing, taking a child and growing it up, they're all effectively the same allegory.

It seems Eusebius taught also a lower form of Christian alchemy. All of them fail to teach true alchemical doctrine. No wonder we're all whacked and can't make stuff work, the REAL doctrine is STILL mostly hidden. I mean I could read MOST of the bible and understand what the inner alchemical doctrine would be but I still can't see it all there yet. I'm not at that level, though I don't know anyone else who really is, say for a few I personally study with.

NG sees sheep as "states of consciousness". He sees "Goodness and mercy" as qualities of the character. Remember that FEELING is FEELING INTO AKA GROWING INTO a state, a HIGHER state. Just imagining without moving current AKA overlapping inner substances of taking conscious into unconscious mind MEANING being put under fire and transformed, unless that mechanism is worked then no transformation AKA elevation of state works. That's the thing he should've emphasized, else people get deluded into mentalism, which is what it seems like.

I've read most of the big points that claim the Joseph of Arimathea moved to Britain with some others and established the new order. I still believe that King Arthur was likely a thing, but I still don't KNOW. I will also interpret the death of Christ for you with the disasters that happen. So it's about to fully integrate the components. The sun darkening means you'd likely lose consciousness for a period of time, or that your thinking mind would "die", the earthquake would be the experience that I feel when I have quickening's except MUCH stronger since you're overlapping literal God here and getting the full dose of illuminating starlight move through you as you merge with that power. These things happening in Jerusalem represents the seat of your consciousness being moved up another level. Any disaster in Jerusalem and the destruction of temples and all this stuff are signs of good things, because it means you're breaking old stuff. NG interprets this as "awakened imagination". I see that as way too simplified. His doctrine misses so much detail of substance interaction it's insane. I KNOW this is correct because systems like TCM exist. NG denied kundalini yoga as a way of enlightening remember. I quoted him going after them in page 4 or 5 I believe. This whole "realizing who you are" thing that NG preaches is an EFFECT, not a CAUSE. It comes THROUGH you. You CANNOT "know yourself" with ANY technique. It's always through transformation and owning who you are that this becomes something practical, AKA breaking boxes means THE SAME THING AS AWAKENED IMAGINATION! There's ZERO difference mechanically speaking. You won't hear this from anyone else because they STILL think imagination is imaginal senses.

"Worship God; be just to all men; die for your country."

When people read that they'll think this is totally devoid of alchemy, and yet we operate within an unfolding story with physical opportunities available to perform transformation on the regular. Worship God means be yourself without compromise and increase function and individuation, be just to all men means see the essence in everybody, and die for your country, means apply a sense of responsibility when necessary. The thing is, this whole "die for your country" thing is still a bit of a stretch, I don't teach that, that's dumb, but the principle underlying that holds true. Guess what. If men of this world didn't hold a sense of responsibility or duty we'd all be living in the 3rd world. CORRECT? We would NOT have a world with the resources and tech we have now, and it's ONLY because people came together and served the best interests BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT THEY WANTED, is the most important part. I don't teach anyone to literally go out and die for any block of land, but to provide the best material foundation for your people, family, and all that, because it only elevates you, which goes into be just to all men. Common sense right? Ultimately though, it's to be yourself without compromise. Nobody should participate in wars and all this stuff, because wars are banker wars. With that being said, I pretty much will conclude this.

As stated before, Christ LIKELY physically existed, since scripture obviously connects to real people and places that existed TO SOME EXTENT, and he taught alchemy to a handful of initiates. I agree with the alchemist on this, because that's his take. I cannot really refute this reliably. There's too many examples of British writings about Christ existing and all that as well as the links to BC period of iron and bronze age examples of almost exact passages from scripture being "copied". All the flood accounts from these other seeming cultures are also all retelling the same stories, in allegorical terms. You can KIND OF reconcile a physical history but it's a real stretch, if we're real. The druids in Britain operated under the carried on OT doctrine into the new age. The duty and responsibility is really relating to taking opportunities to stretch your heights of demonstrating you HAVE SUPLPY OF LOVE within you. If you respect yourself fully, you'd WANT to provide that to others WHEN NECESSARY. Most people I don't believe will struggle with that though, at least not the ones outside the LOA space. Don't take that to some extreme, simply apply common sense, though if you went back a few centuries this would be part of life. Military activity has defined most of our history, has it not? Of course that's what the druids would have written, because it was necessary. Now it's about defending against aliens, and eradicating power structures and banking systems. I don't believe that the physical crucifixion of Christ happened, though I'm still unable to fully tell. The best examples are still very unreliable. The son of God is you, the lower yang, and since he IS God, it's that there's a simulacrum connection. Your lower yang is NOT God in the complete sense of fully individuated, else there would be no need for marriage. THE FACT THAT MARRIAGE IS A THEME IN THE BIBLE PROVES THERE'S TRANSFORMAION THROUGH OVERLAPPING SUBSTANCES! Remember, the NG version sounds VERY empowering, that your mind is God, which it is, but not how he says it is, else the marriage isn't a thing. Also remember he says that God is separate from you in his later lectures by saying that "God zaps you" "for the work to be done in him". No surprise, he did teach this, but nobody knows this. The clear context of that was about expansion. The NG interpretation is filled with subjective interpretation, and in most cases, leads to a solipsistic view on reality, mentalistic relative view where it's all thought and imaginal senses, which it's not, obviously. That's an EFFECT, not a cause, though mind AKA imagination IS YOUR WHOLE PSYCHE, and yet he also said FEELING IS THE ONLY WAY TO IMPACT REALITY, AKA to move current WITH the mind. Mind in a vacuum isn't the cause, overlapping the thinking mind with the water is the way to change AKA expand, AKA manifest through expansion of the seeds within unfolding as automatically implied suggestions. NG says that marriage in the bible is joining with your imaginal end. You see the FEELING of that IS the overlap, so mechanically speaking I can agree with him on that but it's SO HEAVILY WATERED DOWN THAT NOBODY WOULD KNOW THAT! The interpretation of praying in secret and "entering her bed chamber" and whatnot AKA implying an "psychic sexual act" meaning that you're using the thinking mind to feel is also correct, but he never talks about it like this because he never discusses the alchemy. Look whenever he talks about feeling you can think of it like using your conscious mind to experience the unconscious mind AKA the substantive aspects of the field geometry and the current moving in the meridians. When he talks about then entering the bed chamber in secret, IT"S NOT WHAT HE SAYS ABOUT IMAGINING AT NIGHT BEFORE BED IT'S ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF OVERLAPPING STATES. OBVIOUSLY. That's THE ONE PATTERN PLAYING THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE BIBLE. PERIOD.

The bible can't all be allegory though, there's too many things that relate to physical reality for it to exclusively be allegory, even if they're few. There's a physical manifestation of allegorical overlap, AKA literal sexual experience which births literal children. Why is this even a thing? Why are there 2 sexes? Male and female? Why? Because it's one pattern. Yeah NG has mentioned this one pattern I believe at some point but once again it's never emphasized. I guess he taught this way because he wanted people to just feel like they can be who they want to be and to apply themselves more in life, but that came at a cost of MISINTERPRETING HIS DOCTRINE.

If you interpret everything that he mentions about "imagination" to be the substances we've established here which are DIVISIONS or COMPONENTS of consciousness AKA imagination then you'll understand it FAR better.

"Let us take a vivid example. When Hitler and his Third Reich came into power, unnumbered happily married women who loved their husbands and children fell in love with the concept of a superior race . . a Germanic race who would enslave humanity. And as the idea caught fire in their minds, these women had an affair with Hitler in their dreams. It was not the person, Hitler, that they had union with, but the state he personified"

The above quote is from "your husband" from 1968. NG obviously doesn't understand real history. What a fool. Either way, he was teaching us that our imagination AKA overlapping states is how we manifest. PERIOD. The functional mechanism I've taught since the very first video on my channel IS THE SAME THIHNG HE TEACHES, except mechanically explained 100x better. Remember NG also wrote a book called "The story of Jesus is persistent assumption". That's meaning persistent overlap, persistent challenging of boxes and limits, persistent unfolding of truth. This is ALL expansion through overlapping, else the functional process of alchemy doesn't happen. The emerald tablet makes this clear.

"In truth, without deceit, certain and most veritable,
That which is Below corresponds to that which is Above, and that which is Above corresponds to that which is Below, to accomplish the Miracles of the One Thing. Just
as all things have come from this One Thing, through the mediation of One Mind, so
do all created things originate from this One Thing through transformation.
Its Father is the Sun, its Mother the Moon. The Wind carries it in its belly. Its Nurse is
the Earth. It is the origin of all, the consecration of the universe. Its inherent strength
is perfected if it is turned into Earth.
Separate the Earth from Fire, the subtle from the gross, gently and with great
ingenuity. It rises from Earth to Heaven and descends again to Earth, thereby
combining within itself the powers of both the Above and the Below.
Thus will you obtain the Glory of the whole universe. All obscurity will be clear to
you. This is the greatest force of all powers because it overcomes every subtle thing
and penetrates every solid thing.
In this way was the universe created. From this comes many wondrous applications
because this is the pattern. Therefore am I called Thrice Greatest Hermes, having all
three parts of the Wisdom of the whole universe. Herein I have completely explained
the operation of the Sun."

That is EVERYTHING about the bible in one place. That's everything there is in reality right there. Notice it says all things that are above correspond to that which is below. That's because you're a simulacrum. It's talking about your states, your substances, your capacities of growth. That's what it's talking about. The one thing, through transformation. Then it gets into how. The father is the sun, obviously, which we went over before. The wind is air, carries means moves, activates. Nurse is the earth means that's the density of Saturn which drives the intelligent organizing of what that activating wind is going to do to your lower states, for example when you are gazing. You're fulfilling that part of the tablet. It's all there. You're actually doing that when you do what NG says, but of course I'm the only one who seems to grasp that because everything is interpreted as just mind imagining by NG. There's no deeper breakdown. The process then it says of turning it into earth actually means taking the overlap of those lower sun and moon, moved by air into earth, creates more earth! That's proof of the creation of more subconscious as the foundational part of expansion. From there you separate earth from fire, meaning you're extracting "the secret salt" as some call it. Lab alchemy is clear on how delicate this process is, because it's a very slow process, though naturally all substances are doing this. We simply accelerate this already unfolding process. Wow I just had a blast of juice then. How fun. So when it goes from earth to heaven and back it's what I was talking about with the death of Christ before. That process is the same thing, in essence. Then you obtain the glory of the whole universe, AKA your whole imagination, AKA your whole simulacrum is integrated and you're immortal. That's the deeper truth of the NG allegory of "awakening imagination" and all that. It's THIS process unfolding THROUGH you as you expand under pressure. That's it.

Also notice he calls himself thrice greatest Hermes? Yeah. Britain. Tri/Tra/Tro. Those lands we went over, triangle land. Perhaps these so called savage pagan druids knew more than we think. This is why I believe that the light people carried this tradition. It's everywhere in our architecture, coded into the matrix almost. The emerald tablets are Greek as far as I know, which carried our tradition too. The trinity comes from here. the druids are an extension of that.

14/9/25

I've been developing my own theurgy process using specific imaginal experiences. Since theurgy is simply inner alchemy, AKA imaginary acupuncture to use a TCM comparison, all we need to do is generate overlap with the right elements under specific conditions of pressure to purify the base elements. This can involve imagining the most simplistic representation of those themes. THIS DOESN"T HAVE TO BE ABOUT REAL EXPERIENCES IT CAN EVEN JUST BE COLOURS OR SHAPES. I get a LOT of geometry revealed to me in gazing, and when I wake up. Overlapping 5 star geometries with particles floating around. I'm pretty sure it's an underworld entity looking to contact me and explore this process further. Also creating audio that leads context does the same thing effectively to, so long as you can surrender to the experience. Manifesting through decoding the thematic nature of a limit and using that as a proxy experience for the real thing is TECHNICALLY JUST AS EFFECTIVE. Gazing while doing this has power.

Been thinking more about the nature of pre-determined reality, the collective experience, and responsibility. I KNOW a ton of people who read my take on that are offput, the feeling of needing to deny inner truth surfaces, and it's heavy. Here's another level explanation, the one that's broader, and considering the cyclic expansion nature of reality. Cyclic expansion being a natural self correction cycle, swings in and out of pressure on a reoccurring basis. The entire point of what I said before about holding responsibility for reality other than self is that those swings of the states that collective experiences go through are opportunities to expand further, because they're extra-personal, if that's even a word. So, pulling away from the narrower perspective of specific stuff, like banking systems and stuff and instead learning to master the wider view. You see, blood and soil is still a temporary reality as well within the metaphysical nature. You're tied to blood and soil on the context of how you're impacted by that on the collective events perspective. Those factors WILL matter, because the collective perception of such variables will determine the shift in culture of what's deemed acceptable or not for you to act on, and to you what was once acceptable now no longer be acceptable, and that will be a supply of pressure. The recent event, Kirk, you know the guy. This WILL initiate a shift within culture, for the better I'd say, but to a lot that will marginalize them further and further and further. This was OBVIOUSLY an event that's designed to initiate the final "straw that broke the camels back" to provide a REASON to unload the pressure people felt within about how they've been tolerating degeneracy from those on the other side of the spectrum. You see, what I mean, blood and soil WILL impact you, your take on such WILL impact you, because having a side will place you in a box that will determine what now becomes pressure for you and thus opportunities to further individuate. The responsibility to make decisions that "benefit others" more or less is an extension of your personal expansion overlapping the same processes that others are unfolding through, and so because now people feel safe generally to unload the pressure within and speak their minds then that generates a 100'th monkey effect where now everybody feels safe and the new trend is established.

What I failed to realize, or at least properly recognize as the most important variable in this whole thing, arguably, is that the only constant is CHANGE. People swing from left to right ALL THE TIME on a cyclic basis, Thus, we can say the the seeming responsibility CHANGES all the time. Who's a friend now becomes an enemy, or not. The only ones who seemingly don't get impacted by this are the ones who get around playing on either end of the spectrum who win in the end, because everyone else ISN'T INDIVIDUATED. Why do I say that? Because when you're operating from a degree of function that's greater you won't WANT to give your vitality to reaction to such low level events, or hold passion for sides. I don't preach sides, though I will still argue functionally that where things were was worse and if left unchecked would continue on forever into complete dissolution, but that's also the point. You see, there's greater processes playing all this out, through us, through the media campaigns. It's like it's DESIGNED to harvest vitality, and the ones who win are non reactive because it's seen as the forest for the trees instead of just seeing tons of trees. So our responsibility to others, then, from a wider perspective, becomes the responsibility we play into moving through the process that's unfolding to bring about the changes we need to use our vitality in a functional way and by extension that impact is what's correct. It's how roles overlap and interact, in a functional way. So, does that mean then that harming someone else physically can be functional? Yeah. 110%. Guess what. The shooting event with Kirk was functional. Why? Because it was a catalyzing event that led to the release of pressure within a lot of people. It's like all that unconscious trash in the 2nd ring was made conscious for those types and they felt all that pressure surface. It was functional, because it led to more consciousness. Does this mean personally that harming others is dysfunctional? I want to say no, but that's just not true in all cases, despite what so called "natural law" experts would say. I just gave an example that was functional, because it led to expansion, not willingly in the same way, but it still expanded views. When I had commentary last time on those quotes from centuries ago about how promiscuous women was taken on the street and shamed publicly, it's one of those things that many here in this space would look at and think "that's not how you teach lessons of function" and yet in our own lives, when we get beat, we have a moment of heightened awareness where we're forced to face our feelings. Is this not true? I don't care HOW it's done, it's the functional mechanism that matters. So the law of "do no harm" once again, how are we interpreting this? Is harm a negative thing if it'll lead to someone becoming conscious of unconscious resistance? The robber plays the role to steal from the seeming innocent, and yet somewhere in that innocent persons psyche lays a layer of dysfunction that was necessary to be made conscious and transformed through such an experience. Is this not how manifestation works? Thematic supply demand?

The rich will be the host of envy where they walk. The beautiful will garner envy too from the gross. There is a necessity for both levels of the roles to play. The rich bankers NEED people to go along with their psychological box for their condition to work. Is this not true? Thing is when it comes to things on such scale, you as an individual navigating such likely will not need to see that as a condition, because it's something 99.9999999% out of your control to any degree that's impactful to change that condition. Let's be real. So why spend vitality in ways that's not functional and worry over needless trash. Drop it and move forward, because that vitality can be spent far more functionally. This is my main point. Morality. This mechanically speaking comes back to spending vitality to lead to expansion, and not about following any subjective codes of HOW that may be manifest. If vitality is spent functionally to expand then you win.

The big point is this. There's rules here, but they always move, and we've seen examples of this. Blood and soil, as I said before, is not a permanent variable. The only variable is the mechanical function of expansion or contraction, though blood and soil is A variable within that scope. It matters, just like the rest, but only to the degree that they do within context of necessity to transform and mediate pressure. This is the overarching truth I was always meaning to write.

With this in mind. Who carried these traditions of expansion of consciousness through the ages? Us. Always was and seemingly always will be. The aliens never did. Zero hate, just facts. All modern so called enlightenment systems came from western minds, and I just went over the history of biblical doctrine. Looking down upon another means you have that within you, though is it dysfunctional to look down upon a parasite who cannot provide anything seemingly good in this world? Well even the parasite has its own place. The parasite enables transformation of other opportunities to become available. The conditioning force itself is the very essence of what enables transformation, and thus we have gratitude to the parasites who suck the life out of us, because it is them who drive us above all else to WANT to expand. The functional condition of baseline dissolution of vitality CANNOT BE STOPPED PERMANENTLY. The ONLY variable that doesn't change is change itself. Things always change, and thus a force for change must exist, therefore I have gratitude for the aliens and the banking parasites who make our lives worse. Why? Because without those manifestations we'd not be here now writing about such great mechanisms of consciousness. Some may interpret this as negative, but I don't care. I don't care one bit. I only operate through functional mechanics, because that's where correctness is obtained, and always will be. Expansion through following inner truth, how you feel, knowing where vitality needs to move to expand, that's the inner guidance mechanism which leads to individuation. Always was. Always will be. That invisible torch that lights an invisible track to walk on invisible floor, and thus we walk in faith, but we know the way because we keep seeing the light moving in a certain direction and it's all we have to go on so we trust and follow the pattern because the pattern exists to expand us.

I also want to reiterate on a main point here again. We have clearly come to understand through the recent historical studies, that dating history, is almost 100% based on inference. Carbon dating, which I've already expressed serious doubt over as to the accuracy of it, as well as ice core dating and all the rest, which all rely on some whacked ideas, just like microbiology and especially virology. I've 100% exposed virology to be a bunk science and I'll debate ANYBODY ON THAT AND DESTROY THEM! I put in over 3 years of HARDCORE study on those sciences and went through HUNDREDS of papers on the subject and I know how viral isolation protocols work like the back of my hand. That's all a bunch of trash, just like almost every other so called science. That's what I want you to take out of this if anything. Everything that's promoted out there is a joke.

There's more historical study that needs doing on other things. I do not believe the past is what it's claimed to be, that we evolved millions of years ago. That's dumb as heck. What a brain fart you'd have to be to believe that.

I also want to make something else clear here now. Going on about the point of historical nature and peoples who carried various traditions through time. I still do not believe that the history of racial nature is also untainted with absurdities either. I do believe that there are some types of people who do not exist anymore, at least not where we see them. I know that there have been other races of humans, giants, and that they have played a role in our history. What role? I don't know. There's various ideas, though nobody can PROVE it, only infer through enough data that would make it seem pretty clear as to a logical foundation. There is some VERY good data put out there I've seen, which infer that the giants existed due to vapor canopies in the atmosphere, and that this world undergoes regular collective "scenarios" which shake up the conditions we face thematically on a regular basis. The whole program is driven by a greater process, and that various plasma events have happened throughout time and even sudden petrifications of life that can clearly be seen today in stone still around. Humans included, every form of life, us included. I believe that this likely happened at some point, because the biblical explanation for giants being around is that they were fallen angels, which makes sense within dual seedline doctrine and really has next to no contradictions in scripture, but I still don't see a complete explanation there.

You know, the nature of things, and how pre-existing narratives can colour our views, it's not like we should let current circumstances shape our historical lens. Just because Juize admit to wanting to eradicate us, doesn't mean that's the big picture. It means that's how things are going now, for whatever reason, and that's likely what we're SUPPOSED to learn to integrate so that it DOESN'T move us. Are we suppose to solve those problems personally? It's not something I really believe we SHOULD need to, and that the greater process will mediate collective circumstances more or less to harvest your vitality and get you to pay attention to the inner transformation more so than anything. Like the real question is, do those circumstances ACTUALLY matter. Well they impact us, but the thing is are we actually suppose to SOLVE them? Is that just like trying to grab air, because the nature of how pressure manifests here collectively isn't something we're SUPPOSE to change, which is why the history of these groups of people seem to indicate that they never lose, at least not for long. I've got literally 60+ different examples of people who went after them in history and failed, though there's been victories, however short lived, so it makes me consider the fact that we do not live in a reality where changing such conditions is in fact part of our process, and that mattering this system without holding responsibility for the lack of others and that seeing them suffer is simply yet more of the reality of how things work here to be transformed and cut through. It really makes me wonder, because I KNOW there's no judgement for morality, so called morality, I know there's no judgement for such, even though scripture says so I simply don't see how that would work. I believe that the judgement is more or less a plasma event that's based on how functional you are, and those who aren't filled with dysfunction won't be evaporated, or in the case of what we know to be the case based on archaeology, instantly petrified into stone or glass.

I'll be real here. I believe that most of these events, that are designed to trigger us, collectively, are more or less for the purpose of making what's unconscious conscious, and that it's ONLY until a mass of people reach a tipping point that scenarios can change with Juize in power. Personally, you're not in that place to play the role to remove them. Nobody has, personally, that I know in history through all the figures I've studied. I know they knock off almost everyone who goes for their system, but we never seem to come out on top until and or unless there's enough collective backing to support that movement. It's like, unless there's "consciousness" that can move the pendulum to the other side, though gradual shifts in collective awareness as a function of these events which awaken unconscious conditioning, then things cannot change. Really. Let's be real. So, in my case, my liver qi stagnation that's stuck around for so long, which got worse and worse as a function of caring too much about seeing things burn down, I can recognize and let go, because it MUST be dropped to move past the plateau. In fact, last night, I had another manifestation of the geometries manifest in my vision, like the overlay. At first I thought I was in a room, there was glowing shapes moving all around me like I was in a holographic chamber or something but it was just in my bed. They were so bright, and they all moved together. These various geometric formations. Every time I push through one of these levels, I tend to see new formations. New geometries that are looking to reveal mysteries to me. If you do gazing enough, you'll see them too, and they'll speak to you and show you things. You'll experience what NG did about going to "other worlds".

The only way to explain Jesus with his miracles, is through personally projected plasma events. I'm almost willing to go ahead and say that the only real reason why we still suffer, is because that's simply the nature of the dynamism of the mechanics of reality. Thing is there's been events in history such as instant petrification only reveals that there's got to be divine powers at play and that there's no chance there's natural explanations from people doing crazy stuff. This was something which happened TO US. It's almost like we live in a system designed to torture us and constantly test us and push us into provocation. The media, the banking, the food and medical systems, science, history, all of it. The very conditioning exists to pull you into conforming with the conventional views and narratives that are propagated. The alchemist dismisses the demiurge, yet it's so organized in how it seems to act in this world through certain people.

The ori OST. I remember this use to bring me to tears on the regular. I’ve been listening to other music that’s like this again with the heavy emphasis on woodwind and strings for instruments. This kind of stuff when done right I belive represents the air element, that ethereal sensation that’s thematically associated to this stuff brings out tears with me. I’d often listen to darker sounding stuff, more “gritty” and earthy and wood element type stuff but the air element seems to bring out real transformation. I’ve also been imagining myself filled with deep heavy thick substance and then condensing it into even more dense substance and just feeling my body get packed with the most direct manifestation of yin I can think of. I also to the light sensation with a bit of floaty and rising energy from my shoulders up. Seems to lift qi into the upper burner where it’s not typically getting to. Empowering the kidney yang seems to help this at baseline as a root cause but imagining this or more so “feeling” that part of my field causes interesting sensations of balance. I’ve manifested another sum of money today too out of seeming thin air. I went back to look at my notes and it was $1100 less but close enough. Money manifesting seems to be easy, mostly, especially when I just forget about it. Contacted from some people is mostly easy too though I’d say often it’s either I think about what I want to do with this person for a few days then leave it and then it happens or I leave it after just a single thought. Still working on appearance stuff. I’ve noticed something that’s actually making it worse, and I belive it ties into a lack of this qi in the upper burner meridians. The lung qi seems to be a big thing I need to work with personally, and liver blood. Thing is studying as many hours as I do literally burns liver blood and yin. Not good.

Living in a sort of “ethereal” type sensation as though I’m as light as a feather and being agile and on my toes all day heals me. I swear there’s an affinity here because ever since 2015 I’ve been this way. It’s so powerful I can’t describe it. It’s like all my power in flow comes from physically moving my body. I get infinite energy this way. Literally I mean that like the less I move this way the worse things go at baseline it seems. It’s been this way for over a decade. Totally unconscious for the most part. It’s like I HAVE TO be doing acrobatics or martial arts or whatever swift kind of movement of some form. This only ties into my idea about how the air element is where tons of my power comes from. Once again, looking back before I started studying so hard and not moving as much over the day I started to lose vitality and things got harder. When I move I get easier better results. Can’t make it up or deny this pattern. I still have never applied this type of thing in coaching before but it’s there. I use to effortlessly mog so hard back then when I lived and breathed this life for a time. Makes me wonder. Be real. Cut through conditions.

Man it’s so clear huh. There’s the living in the end right there.

Side note. Gazing raises liver yang.

15/9/25

How do we make sense of all this stuff

So it appears to me that there are fixed cycles of history that play out, totally out of our influence. In fact, we are USED to manifest them. I've already spoken about this, about how our field geometry manifests thoughts through us depending on what currents are playing out and which ones aren't. History is the big thing that's always made me question the NG bible doctrine. There is truth there, but it's not the deepest level, or at least not the level that's really how things should work given all the parts of the puzzle. Self empowerment seems to be his niche which is obviously why it's so popular. His doctrine tells us that the experience of the field geometry must reflect in the world, and this is "the law". Thing is it's marketed as this mentalism thing that's obviously totally backwards from how reality works, because there's intelligence outside of our influence here that's seemingly manifesting collective experiences. The banking system for example, the false sciences and all the trash in the history texts, which I've already gone over.

The fact that the biblical dual seedline doctrine contradicts the Juize very intentions to influence and manipulate in contrast to the catholic papacy indoctrination that's been fully refuted 100%. Here's where I was coming at this from this whole time, for years really. If dual seedline is in the bible clearly shown, and we can clearly see in the world today that the Juize are purposefully replacing our people with aliens, and falsifying our past and making up trash about those periods of time WHICH WE WENT OVER IN GREAT DETAILS, then how could this be incorrect? Then there's the question of the Juize also being caught up in this false doctrine of them being the chosen people, and that they believe they're those who are fulfilling scripture BECAUSE OF GLOBAL EVENTS THAT TURN THE WORLD AGAINST ISRAEL JUST AS IT SAYS IN THE END TIMES OPENING THE SEALS. So there's these contradicting doctrines, where one side of the story has the Juize who can seemingly demonstrate they're those types, yet also with us, and the flood of people and the false history and all the rest of that which goes back to Britain and the land of Troad and such. If this is the case and also that these characters go back to the ancient 800+BC period of time with the Stele we went over, and also that the alchemist himself testified that Christ existed and taught alchemy, how do you connect all of this? Well, there must be an intelligence driving the seeming conditioning on a mass scale to be deceived by design, and the NG stuff is part of that. The Egyptians had red hair pharaohs, Tutankhamen and Ramses, and probably others I've not gone deep enough into to make claims of such nature. The thing is that it's clear that the light people showed up seemingly out of thin air, I wouldn't deny that the other types of people have been here longer, but that doesn't mean they wrote the texts. They've shown next to no signs of being capable of building their own civilizations past the stone age when left to their own devices. It's almost like we showed up out of thin air with all the technology and stuff like we spawned in out of thin air. The pyramids were built with such precision which couldn't have been done without assistance from some higher awareness of some form, so it's either we're living in a reality that's cyclically shifting around variables to manifest the will of the intelligence that's running it so that we're going to be conditioned to manifest the will of it (whether that be God or not but as far as I know God is personal to us and yet also answers to a God above them according to the alchemist) in which case, we're being moved through an unconscious willing acceptance of those greater processes to manifest what it wants instead of what we want. It's like the media exists, that phones and streaming exists, all of this exists now to serve the function of delivering payloads of conditioning as effectively as possible, which is also why I believe they will never go away until they're no longer useful. All of this tech, all of this stuff that can delver conditioning to us easier, that's what's promoted, normalized, popularized and thus used against us. to keep us away from our own inner truth. The gazing breaks this box by denying that supply for our insight.

When you look at one of the core doctrines that NG preaches, he's basically telling us that we need to believe in our own desire, to mediate our own supply of pressure, but never really gives us tools to differentiate that and in so doing thus he assumes we have that connection when most don't know the difference in reality. Many people who apply that will still just manifest what the conditioning wants them to. Playing their role in building these artificial boxes of conformation. It's just clear to me really, that this whole CHRISTOS idea, that we have a means of salvation, means that there is SOMETHING WE NEED SAVING FROM. I DO NOT see ANY reason that the salvation is from limiting beliefs, in a vacuum. Immortality. Immortality OF WHAT? The components of consciousness which comprise the interface of who we are. What is metaphysics? The study of the components that thematically unfold into tangible manifestation. Right? Metaphysics is the study of the language of consciousness itself, the interface, and thus mastering this hidden underlying interface means mastering the so called reality. Reality Synthesis. So once again, is salvation from the lower senses just for the purpose of living out pleasures of life or is there a greater process involved? I do not see how this can lead to anything except immortality, but to be real, you can't help but question the nature of history and all these things when you go dep enough. Why are there so many deceptions that seem to have such momentum and influence and power behind them? There MUST BE an intelligence manifesting these things which we're all buying into. What if the salvation is more so from the conditioning of the intelligence driving all this more so than simply living out a reality where all your "greatest desires" can be realized. To me, that sounds like continuing to buy into the false reality. There's false history, false science, false paradigms of realty itself, a completely compromised political system which we seem to have ZERO influence over and yet all watch and are influenced by. Why is this so pervasive? What are we being saved from? Why is suffering even the condition? Expansion, integration, though is it necessary? Is all this REALLY necessary? Why are there so many flat out deceptions and harmful acts done by the filth in power playing their roles to warp the very fabric of what's believed? This right here, this dark reality is the foundations of what started me on this path, of figuring out the facts. I can let that go and go live in fantasy land which I have before and yet the conditioning once again sticks out to me the moment that something I know to be untrue surfaces. Is it ALL just limited beliefs or am I aware of something we need saving from? What are we being saved from? If the higher genius is here to use us as tools for what it needs, mutually seemingly benefiting us, then obviously there's some other process involved on a collective level where each so called higher genius is in cahoots and manifesting and mediating us to play out the will of what it wants, which is supposedly also what we want. We're controlled by the will of that intelligence, and it will force control if it so chooses to and override our consciousness if it wants, according to the alchemist. To what end? All I see out of this is the conditioning of capacity to individuate and hold back that capacity because it doesn't want to deal with that. It's like there's a competing force that's keeping us into a box it wants us to be in, and thus salvation must be from that force, that intelligence, that conditioning influence, and immortality more so is the integration of the real you, the capacities that we have and integrate them.

The question we still need to answer is this, If the "expansion of consciousness" as it's called is simply becoming aware of more, then what MORE are we becoming aware of at once? Is it just removing all the trash that's not self? Well that's what this really is about, so what's not self then? EVERYTHING! Literally. I don't buy this idea that we need to dissolve into a particle of dust with nothing there. That's Buddhist trash. What I see as a more reasonable answer is more so that the expansion is that you become someone on the level who can live without being influenced by the intelligence of conditioning. You don't FEED INTO the conditioning field, you experience everything that is NOT the conditioning field, right? Everything in this world is trying to devalue you, attack you, bring you down, keep you small and weak and powerless. That's what it is doing to us all day every day, this friction, this burning of vitality, and the extension of that would be a HARVESTING OF REACTION TO SERVE WHAT IT'S BUILDING. HD says we're building an intelligence that doesn't have our interests in mind through our existence here, which to me sounds about right. The alchemist said that the archetypes are always coming in and out of existence every moment of every day all the time for all eternity and that what I've deduced is that this IS aetheric friction AKA anti-infinity, it IS the manifestation of limitation. Energy, believe it or not, in aetheric physics, IS ENTROPIC. There's an infinite supply but as soon as the door opens then you're burning, or "rubbing" up against that substrate of infinity and thus creating sparks which are the product of aethric friction. This is the burning of Jing, and it seems that each of us have the door closing more and more every day until there's no more sparks left to grind off that infinitely replenishing stone which we live off. Without that infinite supply then we're dead. Thus, immortality, in this case, is integrating all components of our psyche to manifest proportionately as one functional unit and to keep that door open, to BREAK THE PROCESS OF LIMITATION BY NATURE. This is what we're being saved from, the force of depletion, of lack and stagnation, of conditioning to be someone you're not, and to identify as that poor little pitiful person. This interface therefore, IS the "matrix" itself, as a simulacrum of elements we "play" like an instrument and thus "manifest" like magic. The intelligence uses these interfaces which we're all hooked into to basically take what is infinite and "harvest" our cognition to serve it in how it distracts us according to the will it has, and thus we play out its will. We, by partaking in the money system, manifest ITS will. We have the self correction mechanism that's built into the cyclic nature of how vitality transforms and processes which acts as a counter balance to this parasitic influence. Therefore we can explain how someone who's playing into the system is as I said before by design harming everybody else, though in their personal experience it may be functional that way, yet it's still them buying into the box that the conditioning system needs us to be playing into to manifest it into the world, though the thing is that stopping it seems next to impossible based on all the accounts in history I've seen. Nobody has really been able to stop them. They're hijacking our awareness to some degree, to serve their agenda, and thus propagate the normalized cultural foundation of what's not there to be questioned.

There's also this consideration. As I said, since we're a simulacrum of higher genius, of God, of the highest function of reality in existence, then that means that the salvation of the lesser components that reflect that which is above, is for the ultimate purpose of serving a mutually beneficial interest of higher genius and yours as well, since you're now no longer giving your vitality willing to the conditioning process. The Juize are the most direct manifestation of this. The land of Israel has nothing to do with the bible. This is what I mean. This conditioning field exists, this program, this process, this seemingly immortal power that's causing chaos as a function of our existence that's woven into the nature of how energy manifests itself. So once again, the point is to disconnect from the invisible contracts to things that deplete that vitality, close the door, keep us in friction. That's what we're being saved from, because we will be eradicated otherwise. The thing is, does that conditioning field have an intelligence of its own? Well self recursive procession says yes, and in that case, the so called program that's causing all this mess must also have an agenda, a supply it requires to exist and function. You know what that is? Our attention. Our friction with it. The alchemical tradition, it seems the entire purpose of it is to detach from giving our supply to invisible contracts that don't serve us, contrast barriers which keep us compromised, and in the boxes of psychological conditioning. That's pretty much the nature of what we're being saved from, and the alchemical tradition is the code and language of the simulacrum which opens up the method by which detachment can occur, since we're all pretty much born into this place with cords attached. The interesting thing is that, the real you, "consciousness" as in your higher genius, that intelligence seems to be aware of all of this reality and can influence this reality and you as well, and yet it doesn't end this whole thing. Why? Because expansion must be necessary. The contract must be willingly broken, and what does that mean? Well if we cannot manifest anything which we don't have within us (and yet the mass collective cataclysms would say otherwise so it's not a solid point) then it must mean we have to GRADUALLY be detached, else we will explode from too much juice running through the interface and blow it up. It's almost like our link IS an interface, that the elements themselves are like this interface, and we're being saved from the limits of the interface itself, and transcending the necessity to be bound by those archetypal thematic components by integrating them, so they don't move us but we move them. This seems to be what the "program" DOESN'T WANT because then it loses control. The power dynamic shifts.

If NG is telling us that the only reality is imagination, that the components are the only reality, then he's telling us to integrate those components, to then become the supply or really to tap the infinite supply by which we have no limit for to warp the conditioning field around us and shift the balance of influence so that we influence it, and thus we override IT instead of the other way around. What if the only way to destroy the so called demiurge, or the contrast conditioning circuit, is to master the very pieces it uses to influence us through the nervous system and all that and thus become the master of it and to destroy the banking filth then is to become greater than them. This was why I went into this study again, to recognize the overarching function of these dynamics and why they exist in a cosmology that's logically consistent with all the things we know about this place. The giants, the people who showed up seemingly out of thin air and have gradually vanished over time. We, the light people, showed up out of thin air seemingly by coincidence with technology and traditions and all that. You can't trace the history reliably, there's too many anomalies to KNOW. Either way, the fact that there were giants in the world, and that the bible is a metaphysical text which represents physical and non physical events corresponding to the manifestation that the INTERFACE unfolds (which is a metaphysical substrate which filters infinite capacity into limited frictional forms of manifestation represented as what we've decoded here with RS), then we can make the assumption that miracles can and do happen and that the physical nature of reality is able to "bypass" the filter when you're no longer bound by it, meaning those components of limitation become your foundation instead of what you rely on to exist. Individuation. Manifestation. I AM. You become everything and nothing at the same time, because you are all of it, and thus pose a threat to the system of contrast here. You don't dissolve into dust, you become the real you, beyond the interface, the supply which was born into limitation to master the limitation and thus become a supply to contrast the seemingly immortal conditioning pattern.

These ancient worlds possibly could've shown up out of thin air as an effect of someone who broke the boxes and performed such acts. If your imagination AKA your components become the reality directly, which we can clearly see as a metaphysical substrate, then exiting the "limits" means you'd reach that point of expansion where all those components become who you are at once all at the time time, and also to some extent, by design, information and time becomes all accessible at once too because there's no limitation on the propagation velocity of light. Aetheric friction locks C. We have a simple equation therefore, and operating outside those bounds, it's really going beyond suggesting to the substrate of themes of experience.

Interestingly though, there's some people who seem to be CHOSEN to receive this insight. The reason why I say this, and that my current conclusion must follow, is that nobody KNOWS the nature of this reality to the degree that's been revealed in texts such as the bible unless something is revealed through will of who/whatever is delivering those insights. It's almost an act of mercy, on us, the lesser components who are stuck behind the interface unable to play it effectively because we're born into ignorance. Why are some of us CHOSEN to see these things? Because GOD, AKA higher genius, AKA your source of emanation and bottleneck of all out divinity, to serve a function of being a counterbalance to the conditioning. You'd never have figured this out on your own, ever. You'd' need to have these things revealed to you by someone or something, though as we know as you conjoin your components more that becomes accessible, Expansion of awareness is ANTI conditioning, by nature. There's no other way to put it, other than that, God, the higher genius, whatever, that stellar level beyond the interface itself, must be reaching into us and influencing us and manifesting shifts in our reality as hints of dysfunction in the conditioning to bring awareness and contrast to the lack which catalyzes expansion. Is this not true? Therefore, there must also be an influence that's ABOVE the conditioning system that's got a will to destroy it as well, though THROUGH us taking those subtle hints, Why can't it just instantly destroy the conditioning force? Because if that happened we'd all explode because we'd be forced to face an immense amount of light at once and it would blow us up. Those who do advanced gazing know this. There is a counter balance, a built in self correction system, a cyclic process which instills in certain people at the right time with the right scenarios dynamically moved by those who are involved exactly the right experience to enlighten you, just enough to reveal contrast and conditioning barriers for what they are and expand awareness. This makes me wonder, is there a fractal nature to reality itself, that there's a world just like this one outside of and beyond the higher genius where that integrating all those components to effectively transcend this conditioning field opens up to another one? If reality is cyclic then you'd assume so right? But then, is it infinite? Is it as the emerald tablet says, that which is above corresponds to that which is below and how this relates to our personal nature of the components of the interface as a simulacrum or is this about reality itself as well, because metaphysically it would correspond right? These infinite worlds, they're there, but are they OUTSIDE the simulacrum and actually in the "above" FULLY? The alchemist says even he doesn't know what's beyond the higher genius. I can only assume, but it might be a world just like this where we wake up in the dream in the dream in reality, and that there's multiple layers of seeming dreams here that represent the layers of fractality to master. I don't know. All I know is that mastering this place requires us to be ourselves, AKA the real self beyond the interface which binds us to the limits of the substances.

If physical alchemy exists too, then that must mean that building technology here in the system must also enable us to integrate components of the interface outside the system since they correspond. This is why "imagination creates reality" as NG describes it is VERY misleading, because that's not true, else physical lab alchemy couldn't exist. That's the test of a true metaphysical system, which is why RS must be closer to how things work than what he says, There are fixed functions corresponding to this interface, and there are cyclic events that unfold TO US collectively which warp our realty and spawn in whole groups of people out of thin air as though they'd always been there the whole time. I can't prove that, but we showed up out of thin air, nobody can make evolution work. It's insane.

The pyramids are geometrically perfect. Why are they built like that? What does this have to do with ancient Egypt and the people who were there? Were the pyramids spawned in? They certainly weren't built with slave labor. What do they have to do with alchemy? Maybe I should study Egypt more. I've got the Egyptian book coming on Moses in the hieroglyphs.

It seems that a lot of the seeming magic that happens is based on personal bubbles. There's like the overlapping consensus subconscious level of structure and cause and effect, AKA if you drink a cup of mercury you WILL die. Thing is, I remember a story that NG talked about where someone burned their hand and she said "nope" or something like that and it unburned. No signs of burning. There's stories like this that are interesting to me, and I've experienced superhuman stuff too at times. Also I believe to some level that the so called "ark" metaphysically represents the thematic interface on some level. Don't ask why. It's just a hunch. There's like this possibility of running current from higher genius level through the interface and bypassing it, almost as though you're accessing an integrated level of those themes and directly overlaying your subconscious to the collective census level, as though you were already immortal. This phenomena exists in flashes, though my question is this. Is that God playing peekaboo like how I got zapped on the 2nd day I did gazing right as I was about to give up or is this actually something they consciously deliberately did? Was it something that happened THROUGH them or because they "tried" to make it happen?

I just can't shake this sense that there's a way of manifesting substances from outside the limits of the interface of the wu xing. If it can be done, which it has, then that must be a possibility. How? Heightened awareness. Opportunity, Spontaneity. I believe this is the only way you can have these things come through you. It's like you're chosen to be given this chance, and taking it over compromising is how you override the rules of the system. The rules of the system still apply, that should be CLEAR, and yet the examples of people defying this in those rare situations, including in my own life, they're almost designed perfectly to mediate the wu xing into where it needs to be and manifest those substances to channel the greater level of those themes to bring about the realtime manifestation of what you're moving through, It's there. The difference is are we establishing a baseline here that's available always or are we being spontaneous to expand it in moments of opportunity which has really been the most productive method in terms of "speed".

To what extent does this "personal" relative seeming experience apply then? You're overlapping by nature, the collective experience. To override the collective experience and restrict the conditioning of influence then you trace the thematic back to the supply and unfold it through. How? Spontaneity. Heightened awareness. It comes when you're about to give up. It comes almost as a force of applying pressure to you to force that opportunity to open up. If you've not persisted enough you don't get that opportunity through facing the pressure. That's why the built in test works this way, the self correction mechanism. BOOM! Another point. When it comes to conscious so called manifestation, you're applying this process. This is why getting real works instead of living in some fantasy projection and trying to avoid pressure, but even then you'll be forced into facing pressure anyway when that all falls apart. This is the common thread. Is it not? You will be burned, and when you're facing the fire then things move. "I don't need __" makes it show up. Why? Because the inner truth is already there.

Someone who's highly individualized, meaning they don't compromise and take spontaneous intuitive impulse and opportunity by the horns and throws themselves into that unknown, that's when things change. Breaking patterns, to put simply, PHYSICALLY FOR REAL. The reality of experience, we could say. The reality of the experience of breaking patterns being yourself IS WHAT CAUSES MANIFESTATION. That's my thesis. Going all the way IS this, because it's operating according to the self correction mechanism by willingly facing pressure. That's really the functional mechanism. Heightened awareness, experience of inner truth, owning it and cutting through conditioning. Breaking pattern. That's as simple as it is, though we've always said that anyway so. The important part is the reality of experience of breaking pattern. That's how you OVERRIDE the seeming limits, through operating through the interface from greater supply. That moment of heightened awareness IS LITERALLY an opportunity to channel that current. Same thing happens with advanced gazing, which is why you feel the quickening's happen spontaneously and it clears trash, most of the time. You will be opened up more from that. The whole theme is to be saved by God, be saved by greater supply, to be saved from relying on the lesser interface for vitality and nourishment, because that will cause you to die.

The conditioning is DESIGNED to get you to believe in the reality of IT'S experience instead of your own. This is why the solution is an opposing moment of heightened awareness to overlap conscious and unconscious and force the pressure to be squeezed out as all that discomfort is cut through and the conditioning burns away. Is this not true? It's these moments that hold the highest potential for CHANGE, BREAKING PATTERN, SATISFACTION.

No matter how many times I visit this idea, the conclusion stays the same. The function of these fixed processes of conditioning that are driven by the "conditioning field" and the intelligence that's designed to destroy your creative essence AKA JING AKA THE DOOR OF VITALITY BEING OPEN FOR YOU, this intelligence will want you to BELIEVE it's real through the reality of experience, and it will PROVOKE reaction and get you to buy into the realty of that experience over your inner truth, thus an overlay is formed which is the conditioning ring. You will want to avoid the conditioning ring because it hurts to accept that you're not yourself. The solution then is to buy into the story of what this conditioning means about you, and to respond to it in that way by default, but you will instead of cutting through it in a moment of WILLINGLY facing pressure and purifying fire, run into the projection ring which is where the avoidance of self responsibility is seemingly realized, until it bursts open and all that unconscious trash you're trying to overlay with projection and fantasizing and denying necessary transformation, that will force all the unconscious conditioning to become conscious. It is in these moments that the self correction cycle will work for you instead of against you. These moments are experiences you have where you're able to see the truth closer without the projection overlay holding true that you tried to prop up but always fail. You will NEVER manifest satisfying experiences from the 3rd ring. You will ALWAYS dip, because it's necessary for transformation. Thank God for this cycle else you'd be stuck and never have opportunity come up to transform, since you're WILLINGLY avoiding it at that level. This is why LOA keeps people stuck through living in their mind, living in a false bubble of compromised perceptions thinking they're in truth but aren't, and the reason why is because they're avoiding the very reality of experience which would imply they're no longer bound by the unconscious conditioning they've accepted and are avoiding facing. That's why you always end up in the same cycles. So, how do you cut through it? You experience what's necessary UNDER PRESSURE, meaning you create the reality of experience either internally or externally, and that will mean you're ACTUALLY breaking pattern instead of pretending to do so without commitment and putting yourself into the unknown. All moments of heightened awareness involve throwing yourself into an unknown, and that is why you remember them because they're moments where you're illuminating more unconscious trash through a deeper overlap of those components. This is the difference between the 3rd ring and the 1st ring, because the 1st ring will always be satisfying and will be the product of accepting self as is. The solution therefore to cutting through the 2nd ring and getting to truth is to not allow the seeming reality of experience of the 2nd ring to control the decisions you make, what you accept, what's REAL to you, because it's only real due to the somatic sensations of "felt truth" in your body. This process overrides them and clears the trash because you actually learn that it's not necessary to avoid who you are and that you CAN be yourself and experience the role you want.

That's the best description of the 3 rings I can right now.

We receive a "wish" to quote NG, aka a desire/intuitive impulse/a spontaneous opportunity to play a role that's DIFFERENT AND CHALLENGING to who you are now, at least if it'll be SATISFYING. From here we have opportunity to ACT, to DECIDE, to REALISE the reality of experience of BEING that person FOR REAL. Actions are the product of what you believe in, really. If you don't believe in your inner truth, wish, intuitive sense or that FEELING (current illuminating your circuits to reveal different psychological functions that are CHALLENGING to the conditioning of the 2nd ring) then you WILL act in accordance with that conditioning which is doing what it wants you to do. It's keeping you in the REALITY OF EXPERIENCE of "I'm this person" instead of going through the truth and cutting through the pressure of the conditioning which often involves facing the unknown and judgements that FEEL REAL to you because of that crystalized current in the field geometry but these opportunities are the ONLY REAL WAY to clear and transform that. Actions, for real, are a revelation of what's happening inside your field geometry, which is your thematic composition and that's the definition of what your metaphysical interface for higher source of emanation is currently filtering into this lesser corporal iteration. So truly, to change who you are, to change your "conception of self" to quote NG again, you must experience the reality of being someone else, and to do that you need to either virtually experience that for real or you physically play it out. They are no different. You will feel the same in both instances, though the physical reality often won't pose enough of a challenge at certain levels of expansion and therefore theurgy becomes necessary where you stand before more powerful things than what you find in the world.

The question then becomes, do you source vitality from the conditioning which is depleting or do you source vitality from greater supply, which is past the interface and has integrated components which pre-exist those theamtic currents even unfolding through the order of emanation. The further out you go, the more unknown there will be, but that's why it feels so uncomfortable because it's challenging. This is why highly challenging experiences in the world feel like they do, because they're opportunities of you moving closer to truth, where as when you're in conditioning and you're putting up projections then it'll artificially feel satisfying in the pseudo satisfaction cycle but it will never last and you will always crash. That stimulations relies on your shen being artificially stimulated into false comfort and most people consider this experience to be what "the feeling" is when in fact the feeling is more so the realty of experience of being yourself, among other things but that's the functional transformational level of it.

Also do keep in mind, not all of your thoughts are yours. We know this, clearly. You're moved by processes that are outside of you all the time. This is really how manifestation involving other people and collectives experiences happen. Someone suggests, and that thematic composition gets received by those who are playing the role of polarity in which they can be "victims" of an "abuser" which is why then we see these dynamics always play out. There's someone who provides the suggestion for experience and someone else will play the role to fulfil that AUTOMATICALLY and they will be moved to make decisions through your conviction of that assumption of yourself, your role. This is how the phenomena of LOA works, there's no mind magic involved. The mind is simply swimming in all these currents and the individuated mind isn't perturbed by those waves and can drive it.

Reality Synthesis is the only model which correctly explains the dynamics without touching on relativity or subjectivity as the cause. Those who preach "we're emanating a frequency and we experience what's on that frequency" fail to ask the question, frequency OF WHAT? "particles and waves" or whatever. WAVES OF WHAT, PARTICLES OF WHAT? "The quantum field". Yeah right, some magical field that bends to the will of your mind. If you liken this to the aetheric substrate which goes back to antiquity then you'd be more right, because it's a thing that exists arguably AS the interface between what's "real" and imagination AKA the thematic currents which unfold into our experience here. Pressure gradients, magnitude, friction and overlap, interferometry. There's substances which interact to form integrated components which otherwise didn't exist in their own state. The so called field is a self acting substrate that is designed to form into patterns of varying natures which resembles the metaphysical composition of the currents reflecting the substances you're experiencing. Water, wood, fire, earth, air, these aren't "things" but "states" of the aetheric substrate which feed into cycles that self propagate, self recursive circuits. These in themselves become cycles which can overlap you and influence you, and thus in essence, all your conditioning is your overlap with processes of such nature that have organized by other peoples thoughts that you're buying into and accepting to be moved by, thus why I called them "contracts" before, because that's what they're like. You're buying into contracts and agreeing to continue to play the role that this influence is necessitating you play through the reality of experience, which illuminates parts of your receptive field geometry and "forces" you to feel those things to be real, even though they're not beyond those conditions. It seems like they are but they're not. The solution is to see them as conditioning and make necessary decisions which provide the reality of experience which can clear that trash and replace it with functional truth which is proportionate with what God is inspiring you to create here.

Very few of your thoughts are actually yours, in truth. Those ones that are though, those are your way back to infinite vitality. Filtering the trash is necessary, else you'll play the role someone ELSE wants YOU to be. This is WHY fasting from the world is SO IMPORTANT. Gazing for example is the way you reestablish the link to truth, opportunities will spontaneously arise in the thick of the trash as it surfaces in those murky waters and clarity will wash over you. Been there many times myself, just as you want to get up and leave you decide to go through the agitated sensation of heat and you get blasted with illuminating starlight. Visions, voices, clarity shows you what you need to see. This is another way of WILLINGLY facing pressure to cut through conditioning. It's that the deeper you go into overlap the harder you'll find things to be to continue through but the greater the purification will be, This is why I say all the time that transformation happens spontaneously, because the conditions need to be right and pressure needs to be mediated. You're either operating according to false comfort pseudo-satisfaction cycles of not self conditioning that's likely stemming from someone else or the "program" or you're playing as yourself and going against the world. That's the challenge. What are you being saved from? The trash that keeps you stuck in the limits of the interface. Who's the savior? Opportunity. Imagination isn't the savior, imagination isn't God, imagination is the unfolded interface that you experience as sensation of experience AKA the reality of experience which opens up deeper overlap of the components to come closer to truth. The Christ is the between space. That's REALLY "imagination", that "formless" consciousness. It's all the inverse of unfolded components, the rolling back up of unfolded components, you're refolding yourself and the experience of this is as we said before opportunity of transformation. Imagination therefore cannot be the Christ, because imagination still exists as the unfolded unintegrated components. "Divine imagination" if we'd call it that or TRUE imagination, the integrated folded up components that are proportionate and can operate from outside the limited interface of the wu xing, that we could argue IS the Christ, but again that's the RESULT of exposure to opportunity and owning the IMPLICATION, the reality of experience, because YOU'RE EXPERIENCING WHAT'S ACTUALLY REAL THEN AS YOUR TRUTH. You see now? That's why I go after Goddard. Everything that's operating as the lesser still disproportionate unintegrated unindividuated components, those emanate from the interface of the wu xing of the thematics that have yet to be integrated and drive you, cause friction, challenge, and therefore it necessitates that opportunity must also exist through those components because they have yet to be folded back into their proportionate format through, THE REALITY OF EXPERIENCE.

You're either experiencing yourself, your truth, which is satisfying and proportionate and not depleting which isn't entropic and loses vitality or you're operating as someone else who you've been conditioned into believing you are and so operate from a narrow view of that because it means you'll be comfortable and have the approval of the people around you and the program itself that propagated these ideas will USE YOU TO FURTHER CONDITION OTHERS! This is why RS is a threat to that program.

Here's the important question which everyone needs to ask. What is your supply of reality of experience? Are you being supplied to be someone through external stimulus from others or your inner truth, that subtle voice of inner truth, reason against conditioning, felt intuitive sense of contrast against who you are. You can't describe it often but it's there. What that is, is the subtle sense that's always available to get you to question who you are and what role you're playing and what that's coming from. Is that coming from yourself or is that coming from someone else? If it comes from you then own it. If it comes from someone else, then disown it. Forget all the moral stuff, just do it. I won't lecture on what's functional for the civilization you're in because that's beside the point for this. You're really not responsible for that under this context, most of that happens to you anyway, but you'll be moved to navigate it without impact that's dysfunctional. The program, the banker kings, they'll always be there, nobody has been able to take them out in pretty much all of recorded history, say for a brief few centuries in the past. Why is this? Because they're designed to be there to open up opportunity for you, as much as that sucks it's the reason why. We must therefore let go of trying to control those conditions, as much as some of us might want to. Everybody who has tried has failed.

What's the most affordable way to be conditioned? Heightened awareness, and secret suggestion, for example watching media. All of that stuff will influence you, it will move you. You know that, it's designed that way.

Actions are 1000X more powerful than words. Do you want proof of this? You think different and don't get that thing. When you act accordingly, it does.

I just manifested a bunch of free food. You know how? I'm at my friends house tonight and there was a bunch of food out and I wanted some but they said no. I said yes I will. They said no and we exchanged like 10 times, I was denied every time, but you know what I said. I don't care I'll have what I want and I walked in there and had what I wanted and walked out and smiled and they didn't stop me. Screw that. Happened before. I swear, action towards what you want matters 10X more than thinking or hyping up. Just have the guts to own what you want in life. The reason will work for you. Stop being a coward and show up dammit. Same thing happens with girls. Don't take no for an answer. There was this 11/10 who was literally like mind blowing in my massage class who had the same name of the girl I said was going to show up in massage months before I enrolled. I was walking to the shop to get something and I thought passively "Someone like X is going to be there" or something like that and she was. Thing is, I was a coward back then and compromised so hard you wouldn't believe. I eventually got the guts to approach her and tell her I liked her and she's like nope. I said "at least I tried" and moved on. I took no for an answer. I remember throwing my number in her bag because I was such a coward. I knew I wasn't going to get that. Then this other girl showed up a while later at the forest I walked in through my older videos. Guess what, she said yes and asked for numbers and stuff from me just by not taking no for an answer. It worked. Clients who feel all this positive stuff never contact their SP, they get all these insane imaginal things come through them but no physical result. Why? Because they're STILL not contacting them. The moment you break pattern in meaningful ways things change. BIG TIME.

Attitude is like 30%. Applying that attitude is the rest. Acting on it, going all the way. Cutting through the "what if". Lead pathways, act spontaneously, break pattern.

I have so much money showing up lately. Tens of thousands without "lifting a finger". Spontaneous movements. Correct elemental experiences. Movement in those powerful spontaneous pirouettes in the middle of a public space, moving with such efficiency and elegance, those moments I perform without compromise, those impulses to allow vitality to flow through my liver meridian, it manifests as "free flow" in my life. THE THEMATIC CURRENTS ARE REAL AND REPRESENT THE INTERFACE. I've proven everything 110% and tomorrow I will eradicate the IGNORANT FILTH that's in this space which espouses mentalism. I've got so much fire you couldn't even comprehend it. I touch things and transform them. My SP is exactly where I want her, playing out the EXACT things I dreamed of, going exactly where I imagined. Action, action matters. No compromise. I'm going to systematically refute NG and his ignorance of the so called law and irrefutably prove that scripture is both historical and allegorical, because it's a metaphysical thematic text that's manifest on all levels. It IS the code of reality which we can interface with and thus will experience on all levels. I will make him seem so extremely ignorant that the NG subreddit and all these fools who preach mentalism will bow down with embarrassment for promoting such ignorant trash and we will all know who made it happen. Legendary DJ. Reality Synthesis. I've got so much data here on historical biblical accounts that I have ZERO doubt and 100% confidence that nobody in this entire space will even stand a 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001% chance at demonstrating how I'm incorrect. I've done the hardcore study daily for over a decade on this subject. That vitality is present, the power, the drive to destroy, to conquer, to manifest MY WILL here on this pitiful earth and show these fools how a master of the metaphysical nature of reality operates. Screw all that trash, screw ALL the conditioning. None of it matters. It's all dead. Always has been.

I can't stand ignorance. Ignorance needs illuminating. I've proven the past is a fantasy conjured up by parasitic Juize who thrive of deception. Screw all those parasites. Come at me. I'll tear you to shreds! Take down my channel I'll build it back up! TRY ME I DARE YOU!

I'm at that level where just thinking about this stuff is "arousing" not in a sexual way but in a "I find satisfaction in this" kind of way where my vitality is PHYSICALLY BEGGING ME to unfold it. That's how much juice I got in my being, I'm so amped up with vitality it's insane and it didn't take long to recharge. All I had to do was imagine the right stuff to work with my wu xing interface and manifest proportionality. THIS IS THE FREAKING SECRET THAT WORKS AND I'VE FULLY DECODED IT! I get juiced up and I turn into a solid block of steel JUST THINKING ABOUT DESTROYING NEVILLE GODDARD THAT'S THE KIND OF ENERGY WE'RE TALKING ABOUT! IT'S INSANE! People are showing up. They're getting out of my way. They're bending the knee. I'm in charge. I'm creating. I'm the one who runs this show. I created Reality Synthesis and I manifest the reality I WANT. The kidney yang is off the charts, but it's well anchored. THAT'S WHY I IMAGINED MY BODY FILLED WITH THICK DENSE SUBSTANCE BEFORE I SLEPT. I never imagined myself "feeling vital" I worked with the interface of the wu xing. Prove me wrong, LOA buffs. That was the "implication" that was correct for me.

16/9/25

I've just come up with a genius explanation for this stuff. It's massive. Not going to talk about it here. Don't have to spill all my secrets. All I can say is that it's got to do with more of the idea of polarity dynamics, cyclic unfolding of thematic components. processes within princesses. I TALKED ABOUT THIS ALMOST 3 YEARS AGO! I think I understand more of the significance of how gazing and such directly initiates new cycles. You're generating cycles within cycles, all the time. Suggestions and thematic compositions that are dynamic in their unfolding through activity and passivity, yin into yang, and so forth. Day into night. This dynamism is an integral part, and the phenomena of manifestations happening like magic through both ends of this polarity reveal the hidden secrets. Dynamism is how this all functions, at a more core level. There's all these parts, every core piece all exists within an overarching process. Processes within processes. THIS IS THE POINT. Most people who just think and live in the internal and don't unfold with a yang dynamic of spontaneity don't juice up that movement, intuitive impulse represents this opportunity to unfold that substantive crystallization into something active and expressed instead of just the formed composition without charge. The charge comes through you, dynamically, because of this cyclic nature of how yin MUST unfold into yang, EVERY TIME. Without that cycle then you're not completing the process. Yeah, we have to burn trash out and whatnot, but this plays an integral part IN THAT, as I've said doing the burnoff through physical action to transform your baseline availability of the nourishing currents is the easiest way. I'd still argue that it's the ONLY way, because it's metaphysically and alchemically correct. Being broken down and put into circulation and purified, this IS AN ACTIVE FUNCTION. The raw material AKA the dense substance gets BOIILED and TORN APART in the process, meaning you're by nature going to be breaking boxes through being spontaneous. YOU CAN'T NOT. Spontaneous response to intuitive impulse IS THIS FUNCTION IN NATURAL STRIVING. It's all built in. The problem is that you're either playing too much one one side. There can be TOO MUCH activity in which case you don't get to sink charge and reestablish foundation to stand on in stability (which burns yin and causes agitation where you become reactive from too much activity) or you are too passive and not spontaneous enough activating the yang phase of dynamism. The Tai Jitu. It's so obvious. It's right in your face. Too much activity generates heat, which stagnates qi and causes you to dip through the pressure you feel from compromise. Compromise is really a form of holding onto inactivity which isn't functional. You deplete vitality, and thus you'll face self correction cycles. Obviously,

Responsibility for anything except function is dysfunction. Those who play the role of evil expand the function for others by being so. Judge not. God does that. It just can't work. Stuff the banking system. All that trash, this world is temporary and it'll come and go when God decides it's time to go. That overarching process is out of out influence. It's only those who still try and grasp at that, like I did, who get stuck trying to find solutions to unsolvable problems. We're not here to save the world. That was my error, thinking it was MY task to do that.

Being fearless, IS doing the alchemy, just as gazing does. You create your own opportunity. You don't wait for baseline substances, you willingly generate an opportunity and be spontaneous. You change who you were minutes ago in the now and be someone new. This game of dynamism is the secret I've already written about before but it's so much more clear now. My vitality hasn't been this high in literally months. I have INFINITE power, like I have that INFINITE stamina I had when I was 17-18 and I move with such ferocity nobody can look away when I'm in their view. I move like lightning. I had EVERYBODY attracted to me, despite my flaws, I still had that. I have it again, and it's EVEN STRONGER now. Damn it's amazing. There's no way I could ever portray this in word or on video. All I did was give myself what I needed, and was spontaneous. Yeah, the herbs probably helped, but I stopped them some time back and yet all of a sudden BOOM here's all the juice I could ever ask for. Every time I feel fear, I immediately create an opportunity on the spot and make a movement which shocks reality into shutting up those signals. DYNAMISM IS SO IMPORTANT. Sinking charge outside of that, feeling the stability, that vitality without floating and being unanchored. This power seems to be unlimited. I've literally been able to go from getting so puffed I couldn't run through the whole circuit before to now doing multiple rounds. My physical capacity literally went upwards of 10x in days. Can't make this up. Turning heads. It's insane. I believe a big part of this was cutting through the trash of holding onto needing to save the world, and hold those responsible who continued to perpetuate Jewish banking slavery. Jewish filth. Disgusting. I can call a spade a spade, without it moving me. I know these people are not of Israel of the bible, So what though. Screw those parasites, we're way past that now. Don't even consider them a factor. Leave the parasite to suck the life out of those playing the victim role and show them how much you're NOT falling into slavery in their system. YOU WIN THEN!

You are the supply. Spontaneity fulfills the yang polarity cycle of manifestation according to the elemental thematic composition which you'll then unfold THROUGH you as the role that receives the corresponding format of the experience you're suggesting. The suggestion is already there, no need to juice it up. If it lights you up by default then let it do so. Glow.

I believe a BIG part of the causes of qi stagnation is holding onto conditions and denying spontaneity. What's the opposite of the thematic of stagnation and restriction? MASSIVE FLOW. Spontaneous action.

The "gate of life" in TCM IS THE DOOR OF VITALITY. Jing is the key that opens it. The manifestation of vitality is infinite when you're in the other side of the interface. Is this not what illuminating starlight really IS?

17/9/25

Ok. The bible is absolutely historical. There's so much more data I've been through that I've not noted on here but I've been through an incredible amount of data you'd not believe it. I've literally read so much it's given me a whole new frame. NG is flat out wrong about the bible. FLAT OUT WRONG! Yeah, I said it. WRONG. The bible is 100% ALSO historical and I can PROVE IT! Can I prove it with first hand source? No. But I can prove it with hundreds of other OBVIOUS inference. This isn't a stretch, because these different traditions out there almost unanimously believe in cyclic resets of history and my points about the giants and skies regularly darkening and green gel like substances falling from the sky (which I've had multiple documentations of this over the years from centuries gone by) indicate that there is a FIXED trajectory for collective experience. 100% certain. Irrefutable. This explains why we're not in a solipsistic reality, obviously. Thing is, that within that collective trajectory you can navigate within those thematic components you've got available to mostly avoid any impacts from the trash out there. What the so called law of assumption has done has given people a means of basically removing themselves from the overlap with most of the parasitic sources out there. You've got all these parasitic sources, and that mostly comes from Juize, who own everything, and propagate the will of parasitism here through all the machines we've got which are becoming more and more pervasive. Thing is that there are regular cataclysmic cycles that reset the balance of power and switch things up so that no power structure ever gets too out of hand. The will of God as we call it is the metaphysical geometric mathematical conditioning of reality itself. This is why I was an idiot for promoting responsibility for the system being taken down BECAUSE YOU CAN"T! IT'S DESIGNED THAT WAY. Everybody who's tried (I have hundreds of assassination attempt stories on these people going back literally millennia and many more I've not found yet) to take out the ones who are keeping this system in place always fail. You ALWAYS run up against a wall, because it's designed this way. You're not allowed to impact that, at least not when it's not ready to. These people DO have their time when they lose influence but that's on a fixed timeline and the people necessary to bring about that change will play their roles when needed. They will be moved.

So the biblical accounts of giants, for example the battles that happen after the exodus, were physically real. There's too many accounts in other traditions talking about giants for this not to have been the case and since reality is 100% metaphysical and corresponds on all levels it MUST therefore manifest accordingly. Samuel has most of this history. The time when the sky fell, the flood. I remember doing a study on the so called firmament and concluded that there was a large body of water above the earth. This body of water "fell" and flooded the world. This is what the flood was, it was global. PERIOD. There is a physical firmament, 100%. Why do I believe this? Green gel, this stuff has been recoded falling on opposite sides of the world around the same dates. I don't have source material for this, because it's lost on my drive somewhere and I was dumb and didn't name it correctly but it's there, you'll have to take my word for it. These seemingly impossible anomalies exist and are like certain triggered events that happen from within the metaphysical nature of reality hitting thresholds where these things will manifest.

The vapor canopy as is proposed by some makes sense. The vapor canopy is pre-flood time because it's the waters above the veil blocking the sun. The flood happened from 2239BC and ended in 2238BC which is the beginning of the bronze age. White people, AKA Adamites, were created around 4039BC, and were expelled from the garden in 3895BC. I'm so glad I found my old notes on this. I went over much of this history back in early 2022 when I was done with my physics and biology studies for the most part. This is not all my unique work though, I draw from findings others have and filter what does and doesn't seem to fit, though of course I'm willing to be wrong but I used cyclic processes to map history and not sources that were found and written. This is the way you decode history reliably. This last study into Britain made me realize I've already got this data and forgot I had it. I've been through so much that often these things don't stick in my head when I'm laser focused on one track. I finished most of my cyclic history studies back in November of 2022, a few months after I posted gazing and pathway work videos.

So from an unknown time before the Adamites showed up, but I'd have to assume it would be around 5700BC, there were other races on earth between then and when Adam showed up. This pre-Adamite period lasted about 1344 years but there was also a period where there is no history of the pre-Adamites either. Some chock this up to be the "Annunaki" but I don't still buy that, yet, though when I was studying this back in 2021 I found some interesting things either way but that's not to mention here. They're more primitive for a reason. That's just the nature of this timeline that's played out, like a story book with different characters playing different roles and all that stuff. The bible talks of all of this. I need to do a more detailed study on this from a wider perspective and connect other mythos to it but once again, I'm one person with only so much time to go into this stuff.

You didn't create the world you're born into. You spawned into it. You're emanated from higher genius for a function of gaining experience to reach a point of critical threshold of expansion where higher genius has completed what it needs from the lesser being. Now I personally am coming to question the alchemist on a lot of this too, because I believe that this reality as we have it doesn't in fact hold stakes, at least not for higher genius, and that the lesser consciousness that you represent are what's projected from the interface of the wu xing. I believe the wu xing is the interface that splits light into different wavelengths, metaphysically speaking, to correspond with the interferometric wave patterns which represent the geometries of the different thematic elements. This is why I can't stand anyone saying that it's "frequencies" that make this work because that means literally nothing. My subliminal is built on the principle of waves of aether perturb each other and interact with each other at VARYING frequencies to generate a pattern of fractal field geometry which is a self organizing structure and corresponds to certain thematic currents we have in our field geometry, since we're simulacrums of the whole. It's a splitting of light and that these different bands then overlap and that overlap forms geometries and those geometries process different "information" and so conscious experience "receives" these superluminally from the fractal field geometry receptor of the wu xing which is how I said manifestation worked way back in like 2021. Wu xing is the base form of the interface. The interface is what the higher genius WEARS AS US, an emanation, a splitting of light from the source of emanation into a pattern that's broken out from what was once a unified field if we'd call it that. So reality is simply a splitting of capacities that were once merged into separate components. When we do alchemy we overlap these components and align our field geometry to trace back up those patterns to reach the supply once again, and the more you overlap those "states" AKA different degrees of function AKA proportionality with your unique pattern, then the less Jing you'll burn at baseline and the more immortal you're operating as, more function, more availability of currents to move and mediate.

Here's the key point to grasp. The collective experience is pre-determined to suck, or be abundant, according to the way these currents are unfolding. These cyclic processes are simply the thresholds of overlap where the current that's emanated into the fractal projection is much higher which necessitates that massive destruction of all that casts shadow is eradicated. This cosmology works on all levels, unlike before. Because I KNEW that holding onto certain senses of responsibility was making my liver qi stagnation worse but I thought I could find a solution, given all the data I've been through but obviously the solution was to do as I say and drop the trash. It was necessary, and so what I wrote before about all that responsibility and stuff for saving the world and judging for being a sucker for Juize was the stagnation talking. It was the last gasp, because I can assure that it's long gone given my vitality has gone backwards like 10 years, in a good way that is. It's like a huge barrier was lifted out from blocking flow. Now I get juiced up so easy and spontaneity is natural to a degree that's not feeling somewhat "forced".

So my whole point here is that the stakes are simply for you to gain experience, and being a sucker for collective conditioning only makes your life meaningless because you're not gathering the themes into a coherent functional whole. The measure of success in this reality is variety and depth of transformation in different realms of ignorance, not in a knowledge sense but in an experiential integration sense. Individuation. History demonstrates this irrefutably. Also the earth is older than 6000 years, pretty clearly, but not millions. The so called giants of the past were because they existed in the periods of highly charged and dense vapor canopies. We must understand that impossible phenomena does exist in time, as I've already explained there were many giants found. This is not giantism magically showing up in a group of people because there's examples of giants going back not even more than a century and it's possible there's some around still but I highly doubt that. It's said in some of my study notes that there was a vapor canopy from between 522-25 and 540, about a 25 year cycle. My notes also say there was another incident but no date periods. They come and go over time, and the next cycle is actually said to happen after 2042, so. This was the most recent vapor canopy period. Some claim that the vapor canopy pre flood lasted over 1656 years but I don't think it lasted longer than one reset cycle of around 138 years, There'd be way more extensive data showing long standing history with this but it doesn't seem to be that way. There WAS giant creatures and plants and people but they didn't ALL stay that way for long. This is built into the fractal field geometries overlapping and processing different elements according to the themes that are projected into the collective experience we're all integrated within and are bound to. We cannot escape this reality, unless you reverse yourself into the source of emanation by conjoining all the components. That's what alchemy is about, and really the function of your existence.

Reality is a bunch of wavelengths that have a propagation velocity that's proportionate to the overarching process and it's propagation velocity too which determines timing. Do I know what the overarching cycle rate is, or the base frequency of reality? Probably panks constant, if I had to guess, though I'm not a fan of being a blind sucker for that stuff. Either way our personal reality overlap with this collective pre-determined process is also operating on the same principles. There's overlapping components of consciousness that integrate and operate as greater than the sum of the parts to generate specific experiences in our lives. Instead of us being then driven by external supply, we tap into our own supply and thus we don't lose vitality to aetheric friction by operating disproportionately. The entire system is designed to promote a false history and cosmology which never existed before, They create it and repeat it over and over and over and over and suck others into it so they agree and basically amplify that belief system which then will influence you and cause friction by running up against it, There's an incredible amount of vitality necessary to run up against the collective trajectory, I also want to say that I do not believe the exact predictions from the HD system are correct. I believe 2027 will hold shifts but not the kind it predicts. This whole 7-9-11 center being in my opinion isn't a thing, because if that's the case then the interface must also change, which would mean that there's either a dynamically adjusting metaphysical interface that higher genius is interacting with through to experience us or that there's something that's fixed and the alchemy stays universal for all. The HD systems at face value make sense, but once again the further you compare and contrast points to find overlap the less it makes sense, but the principles are still valuable to study.

Also an interesting note. 2239. The year the flood ended. The vapor canopy fell. At this exact time, the same year, the Sumerian system created the "sun calendar" which was a representation of the god UTU-Shemash and Horus (which ties into advanced gazing mind you) was added to the Egyptian Pantheon. There's no reference to Horus which represents greater yang, was in the Egyptian system before then. There's some who will infer he was but that's not the case. I don't have the time go go over the sources because it will take hours so you'll have to take my word for it. Remember the gods represent personifications of components, aspects of the interface, which are metaphysically correspondent. Sodom and Gomorrah ended 390 years later in 1849BC. About 2.8 reset cycles after the flood.

An interesting study would be on the rise and fall of different civilizations. I believe this one would smack some logical sense into the people in LOA who deny logic is a thing in this so called imaginary world. Civilizations typically last in periods of roughly 552 years. Every 138 years X 4 is the reset frequency for minor civilizations, which the last one was in 1902. There's lots of data showing the buried world under major cities from the past, many photos of shops that were dug out of the ground and new ones literally built right on top. When every 552 X 3 (1656 years again) then you get major resets. Notice the trend. Cycles within cycles. Then every 4968 + 1104 (552x2) being 6072 years is an even larger cycle which lines up pretty closely with the 6000 years of time the bible says the world would have here, which should end around 2033. Expect shifts at around this time, according to this data. All I know is that the time period between 2027 and 2042 is going to be very different from what we have now. How do I know this? Because of the way the system is going, and how it's going to have to reset because of the swing of power in this world. That's how my system of chronology works, cycles swinging from polarity to polarity back and forwards at fixed time periods. When you integrate data like this you begin to see the fractal pattern of the projection of the collective interface that we're all swimming in that's driven by greater proses. Process within process. How do you then create order? Breaking cycles within cycles. Spontaneous movements.

Carnegie institution was created in 1902. Big money right there which funded the startup of all the fake sciences. Considering how organic the technological advances seem to be, it's crazy to assume that it's planned ahead of time and that these people who seemingly invent these things ARE ACTUALLY RECEIVING DATA THAT IS BEING PROJECTED INTO THEIR MIND FROM GREATER PROCESS MAKING THEM THINK IT'S THEIRS. They didn't create anything, it's what came through them, just as this is with me. It's not theirs, they process thematic compositions which are translated into sensory level data that they have those "lightbulb" moments, literally. Interestingly Oliver Heaviside (someone I've studied very closely and has some VERY interesting papers) and Arthur Kennelly BOTH INDEPENDENTLY predict the existence of the ionosphere AT THE SAME TIME! If this doesn't prove to you that much of our world is pre-determined with the advances that seem organic but aren't then I don't know what to say. We're living in a highly organized structure of overlapping thematic elements that process and unfold in perfect order. January 1st, Nathan Stubblefield demonstrates the "first" wireless phone that transmits information between 2 devices. Literally the first day of the year. He would've showed up with it the year before you'd think so he could've got in a year earlier with his invention but nope it was January 1st. Surprise. Another one. The supposedly furthest anyone has gone south happened in this year around July 14th. Air conditioning was invented in 1902 as well. It's like this tech shows up on the surface out of thin air, because these old worlds were buried. People just appear with new tech all of a sudden, and people who existed before suddenly find the exact same discoveries it seems. There's a lot more but there's events like these that happened with multiple people being involved with finding the same things at the same time around these reset events. There's many articles of "scientific American" which started in 1845 and still runs to this day under the name "popular mechanics" which documents much of the history of science that many of these references can be found.

This whole process is why I tell people that just because you had those thoughts and it manifested doesn't mean it WAS YOU who did it, as I've always said. Even NG taught "thought transmission" in his early works, so if this exists then clearly not everybody has unique thoughts, according to him, and that we're not the only authority but much of what we think we think is not ours. How do you know it's not yours? Well I'll say this. To become individuated, you'd break cycles of thought and find our what remains. That's how you know. When I fasted from the world I reset my system and a lot of new stuff showed up without me even thinking those thoughts.

The miracles of Christ, I don't know if they happened or not, I've not done extensive chronological study on this time period, but given the papacy admitted many times to forging texts it wouldn't surprise me if SOME of scripture is fake, but I can't conclude that. There's also a possibility that there's parallel cycles running around this time too, not timelines since there's only one timeline, but that certain people were moved in and out of collective level events dynamically to make history show up like it did, a plasma event, like I said might explain it and why there's no documentation. Certain people experience certain things because they need to for the whole process to work, and that they're driven by greater process accordingly. Tools for the higher genius to gain specific experience that's necessary to further the geometric procession. I did say we, in this form, are simply tools, not the creators. We're the result of all of the macrocosmic process playing out, though we have the CAPACITY to individuate instead of just being a receiver instead of a creator. You can only CREATE new stuff (through negation of not self) by breaking cycles of dysfunction. That's also why spontaneous movement manifests fast, because you're PLAYING OUT NEW CYCLES. I swear this explains so much of why people when they first find LOA and stuff they see things happen and then it stops. The act of playing into LOA in the start is like this big thing and they might manifest something but then it goes. Why? Because the shifting of the cycle into something new then gets adapted and since they've not been told the mechanism of manifesting they'll believe it's all thought when in fact thought leads to actions which are the more tangible representation of what's inside. Action is way way way more powerful than thought. Debate me and I'll tear you to shreds and you know that. Most people who seemingly manifest with thought can't prove they did any of that themselves, as I just explained above. You don't know if the thoughts you have are yours often times, even if it's stuff you seem to want.

There's something interesting here. CuiCuilco volcano in Mexico was found with layers of pavement under the lava blocks. Organized pavement. This is actually from a pyramid with blocks under the lava that seems to have buried it, but the thing is there's actually no volcano it's a pyramid buried in lava, as though lava fell from the sly and dropped on top of it, like the flood, but with hot lave which killed everybody on he surface and it was just magically spawned in our of thin air. I'd show pictures but I can't. The book I found this in is unknown, but it's there. There's various examples of this, where there's buried civilizations under the world. We all know this from archaeological digs when artefacts are found. Obviously they're under the ground because there's some kind of pre-planned reset on the surface which buries the old one. Thing is that some people within that frame don't experience the same level of destruction, and so not everybody experiences the burying of the old world because it's something that you're navigating through within the collective experience and some are chosen to stick around while the rest are killed and a new age begins again with a new balance of power. Why would it not? We know this is true. Dark into light and so forth. Everything is like this. Day into night. A metaphysician decodes all of this stuff, though most aren't willing to go that far. These resets are mostly global but also kind of regional because it's picking and targeting certain areas that NEED the reset. There's buried cities, with pavement on top, then lava and ash then more pavement and another city buried. Buried cities under buried cities. How did the structures get there under the ground? Why are there multiple layers of pavement? These are all in Mexico. There was a book detailing the research a team did but I don't have the source. Much of my original work had little to no sourcing. The only way these cyclic resets can actually happen logically is that the CAUSE of manifestation are THEMATIC PRINCIPLES WHICH WE OVERLAP THAT MANIFEST INTO THE COLLECTIVE AND THUS WE OVERLAP THEM. The ones who DON'T overlap them are the ones who have integrated those aspects so they're not "moved" WHICH IS WHAT I'VE BEEN SAYING FOREVER. THAT'S WHAT INDIVIDUATION AND IMMORTALITY IS. You don't get cleared out and killed in the resets as waste in the system because that's how it sees you.

Most science is inferred, especially dating stuff, and assumes conditions are perfect for their predictions to be correct. They've not PROVEN a DAMN THING. I'VE GONE OVER THIS SCIENCE SO MUCH AND I KNOW THEY MAKE STUFF UP ALL THE TIME BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT PAYS THE BILLS! Virology is a TOTALLY fake science. 100% fake. I can destroy any scientist on this. There's ZERO proof of viral contamination or transmission of disease. Anything that may SEEM like that is simply those people buying into that suggestion as to the cause, but every experiment TRYING to prove contagion FAILED, because they don't cause disease. Same with bacteria and most protozoa. It's all Juu funded propaganda, trash. Just like everything else. Nobody can prove me wrong on that. Not a single person, this is the fact. If that's the fact then what does that imply? It means the world isn't what we've been told. What does that imply? It means there's a fixed function of this system out to deliberately deceive you and keep you locked into what IT wants you to believe so that you don't become an individuated being. Being in the thick of this stuff is difficult often times to detach from seeing the narrow view because it's so deep and heavy. This stuff is way deeper than most circumstantial situations you'd face in the world on day to day journeys. The reason why I'm going to be burying my research data in hard cased vaults is to ensure my data will stay uncorrupted into the next reset cycle, if the predictions are correct. I will use this to make fortunes on the other side when everything is back to Juu sponsored history again like it's always been.

Books on old maps are big. Part of the reason why we might not also have documentation of much of the ancient world is because of these resets where only certain data is seemingly discovered, which will typically fit the narrative. That's what's popularized and propagated and assumed to be true. This is why I say you need to find more books, more data, often lesser known stuff, because those will typically contain the juicy stuff. Trusting such data is another question though, often times it's fake just to sell, such as the alien Annunaki story and whatnot. If ancient aliens propagates such ideas then it's obviously fake, because they'd not have that show up to people if it'll reveal deeper mysteries, so these false trails are thrown out like throwing a bone to a dog to keep it happy, The real study isn't on what's popular.

The "dark ages" of the past, makes you wonder if there was another period of vapor canopies. There are maps of an ice free Antarctica and an ice free Greenland from back then. There's a reason why the ice poles are called that now, because it buries much of the history of those periods. Once again, these anomalies exist in old books, but it's always chocked down to "those people weren't as scientific as us and therefore they must be wrong" and yet the world has changed a lot since then. The thematic composition of the collective experience has shifted. Makes you question ice core data too, which I've been studying to find correlations which do have overlaps but that's also likely not by accident either. Just because there's links between C02 and the ice core data doesn't prove millions of years passed with these cycles. There's evidence of instant petrification of certain creatures and people in the past. This place operates on rules that aren't "scientific" by conventional standards. What's crazy is that there's basically zero humidity in Antarctica, no snow fall. Then they create these far programs that we're causing global warming by driving cars and they tax us on it. It's all to promote this trash to control and keep people stuck in what the SYSTEM wants you to believe and thus perpetuate because then you're sucked into what it wants you sucked into. There's no fear I'm promoting here, it's just fact.

The radar that's used to view what's under the ice also shows that many of these ancient maps are VERY ACCURATE, but that's obviously not talked about either. That's a bomb shell right there against the idea that NG believes it's all allegory. What an ignorant fool. yeah, he understood a lot but that's not to say he had it all, which is fine, but propping what he says up as the best is just stupid and clearly shows those who support his stuff lack the experience as someone like myself has in the study of such a field as metaphysics. That's just how it is. This realm of study takes decades of many many hours to fully go through. There's not enough time left really to even read through it all now.

As I did with my archaeology findings refuting the model of pagan worship in Britain that goes against the conventional narrative, the same applies with many other parts. I believe I'm likely one of the first to discover that overlap, because I always question what hard data can show us vs these inferred ideas. When linked to to source material that's written then it can become more clear.

There's also some data pointing to the amount of people in the world to be almost at ZERO around the 6th century AD in 522. 522 had a major reset cycle. 522AD might as well be the beginning of our world. Believe it or not, also, it's clearly admitted by many of the tour guides who take you through Rome that many of the buildings are actually reconstructed because they've been destroyed so badly that they're not safe to go through. There's images of many of these buildings going back to the early 1900's that they were just wastes of bricks and stone without a formation and yet today they're rebuilt into what we see. Those aren't the original buildings. Makes you wonder huh. The people who scoff at such findings obviously haven't seen enough data yet to know the difference. I've known these things for nearly a decade now. That's some heavy stuff to carry around. We're going to experience this happening again in the near future according to how the charts track these things. This probably explains why the system is becoming more and more parasitic and economic devaluation is happening at record pace in the west, though it's likely there will be an upswing soon to counterbalance this at least for a little while. What doesn't surprise me now is that birth rates are falling off a cliff in our world now, at least for the light people, and that's likely what happened in Rome too. Near zero. Revelation must be cyclic, as well as overarching. There's biblical prophesy within biblical prophesy, the same events occurring within each other at different scales.

The world we're in today is just one of various "formats" of what this world is designed to go through and that the people who are here spawn in when necessary to go through these experiences. Makes you question a lot of things. If the flood can happen then people can spawn in, because that's something that's unexplainable by modern science. I mean how do you explain all the tongs stones. Look these things up. Nobody built these things with basic tools. They're all in the pacific by the way too, none in the Atlantic. Who built these? What were they for? Once again. questioning history of the bible becomes easy when you have these things here. There's signs of advanced structures that would've been impossible at the time, for example Mal Tepe in Turkey. The pyramids themselves prove this too. Gobekli Tepe is another site with all these buildings buried in the earth. Once again, people buried under people buried under people over and over, just like is shown all over the world in other places, under the ice caps too. It's global. Makes you wonder what Uluru is too, and why you can't climb it anymore. There's even images of provinces in the Dutch region of Drenthe with literally giant people and then smaller people. I remember hearing the theory that every reset people get smaller, many years ago. There were giant books, giant doors in giant doorways that wouldn't have been practical to be opened by single normal size people because the handles were huge and up high, and all kinds of crazy stuff. How do you explain these structures? It's just not possible for things to have been linear evolution of the same kinds of people. We KNOW that the modern model of history is a joke, because it's well funded and keeps people busy debating the same points because it's profitable and keeps the circus going. Meanwhile here in RS land we go deep into the unknown. Pretty much every real metaphysical system has giants involved. No coincidence right. It's metaphysical, meaning those thematics manifest on a physical basis too. Why would they not? What's the truth about Christ? Did he perform miracles? Who knows, but it wouldn't surprise me if there were plasma events then which would explain much of the mystery that you can't otherwise decode.

We are as I've said, just puppets used by higher genius going through this world in different collective SCENARIOS, like a game campaign with different missions in different times and such, which we as the game characters think we're playing out of free will but really aren't. The alchemy is to reveal you're in the game, to be spontaneous in the moment and break cycles of compromise which keeps you running on the collective cycles instead of your own. If you're on your own cycles then you create your own world within a world, and the metaphysical nature of reality will dynamically move you through that without you dying from these cataclysms because you're not cannon fodder, you're actually doing the work and individuating. The alchemist said that the higher genius only pays attention to those who do the work. Gazing brings that contact, and I've been doing this for a very long time. Maybe that's part of why I've had this stuff shown to me, but I only found this through YEARS OF HARD WORK AND DEEP STUDY AND DOING THROUGH MOUNTAINS AND MOUNTAINS OF DOUBT OVER AND OVER. You hear me doubting here now still, that's part of the process of refinement. If I flip flop then it's part of how synthesis is attained, by entertaining differing views and comparing and contrasting them.

The technolithic period in history, it was all before the flood, before 2239BC and likely started in 3439BC. 2 cycles of 600 years. These people created stone walls that were angled with laser precision, like they'd been physically cut with something advanced. There's the Ogygian deluge of 1687BC too, another day the sun darkened for another 25 years like in 522AD. Why is this thread so common? There's even images of the Incans building walls on top of these razor flat cut bricks during a totally different time period.

You really think NG has the whole picture? That the bible is ALL JUST PSYCHOLOGICAL ALLEGORY? YOU REALLY THINK THAT!?

I've got more books with tons more references in the bibliography. So many books to read, so little time. It's said that 25% of people will die in the next 15 years from this reset.

There's an image of a corner of a stone building made of these perfectly cut laser precise bricks, and the corner IS MADE OF A SINGLE BRICK. The brick itself has a right angle in it. Did you catch that? The brick itself, that's distinct, has in its form a right angle that fits perfectly smoothly into the corner of the room. That's impossible to have been done with basic chisel and hammer and then LIFTED INTO THE CORNER LIKE THAT. No way.

I believe that the so called pagan ritual sacrifice was likely signs of other people from a prior time period. Makes me also wonder that since the light people are the most advanced there are then it's clear that the greater process playing this game through the Juize want us gone so that we can't be a threat.

Cargo Cult. Very interesting study. Primitive peoples worshiped the US military when they dropped supplies on these islands during WW2. They saw these people as gods. This is how the blacks are in their native environments, literally worshipping planes and building monuments and worshipping the monuments hoping they'll return and drop more supplies to the island. Can't tell me we're all equal like that.

There's interesting linguistic stuff that relates every language branching from a single one. When I was being critical of linguistic studies, I was applying that under the context of how it's used to explain really dumb stuff.

It's said that if you die after the cycle of the 4th seal being opened in revelation then there's no more higher genius emanation. Can't verify that I'm simply noting it here. This would also by the way explain population collapse. the 4th seal is opened 2032.

I strongly, I mean, STRONGLY believe that the next war will be between Christian west and Muslim middle east. When? Well, considering that our schools have upwards of 30% Muslim students (I've seen this for myself in person by the way) and none of us really want to accommodate the cultural differences, then obviously tensions will skyrocket. Aus is becoming East-Asia (Chinese and Indians) and Muslim central. You don't believe me? Go check the website for the department for education and see that there's next to no local light Aussies there, it's all non natives. Check the UK. What has this got to do with LOA? Metaphysical dynamics and collective experiences you're forced into experiencing because it's part of the thematic composition that's driving everything here including your thoughts. You cannot separate the collective experience and the personal experience. Yeah, you can lose impact from the collective experience personally by not buying into the propaganda and trash and just living the life you want anyway but the impact will still ripple to SOME EXTENT into your reality no matter how independent you are from it. Mid 2026 is very likely when there will be conflicts in the UK going on first, then in the US, then locally in AUS and probably in Canada too. I believe it will begin with the UK and then spread to the US and elsewhere. There will be a newly established order in the US, it will be that there will be a huge swing towards the right side of politics and nationalism and Islam will go for the east and west coasts of the US which are more available to attack. The massive rise of nationalism is obviously part of the script of the bible as I've talked about many times. We will see if I'm right. If I'm right I'm going to remind everybody of this and prove that it's not something to be avoided and ignored but to understand and integrate so it doesn't move you, so that you become frictionless with the absolute frame of reference of the aetheric substrate of reality itself.

2028 will also be interesting. There will likely be more crazy stuff happen, including major natural disasters which people will probably claim are acts of God since the Christian right will take hold politically. Prepare to hear about these reports from the president, even if minor in scope. More war propagated by the middle east, Israel will claim that it needs defense as it nears closer to establishing the san hedrin. 2029 will have more conflict in Europe between Christians and the Muslims carried on from 2028. I don't think that Europe will be involved much in 2026-7. 2031 will likely end up with some European country, or the UK, being taken by Muslims. Both sides will lose out in this war though, neither end will come out on top. Keep in mind, all of this is propagated by Juuish propaganda. These people are the ones who play the role of dysfunction in the system as it moves through them. Remember, I don't hate anyone, they're just playing these roles. I can call a parasite a parasite but understand it has a function in the totality of things here. 2032 will result in a short lived president of the US, for half a year. Nostradamus predicted this, using a corrected chronological timeline that is. This Islamic push to dominate the west will now likely be at the end and will fade into obscurity by 2033, I guess. At this point the nationalistic ideology will be at the peak and there will likely be massive killings of non white Christians in our countries in the west to purge the remnants of the Muslim and other people who tried to take over. Mark my words it WILL involve pogrom type activities that will be JUSTIFIED THROUGH SCRIPTURE, and in reality it will be Juize who propagate this and the faith people put in this new solution to guarantee safety will backfire on the people and they will no longer have faith in the system. It will be the true end of freedom for the people who are "anti-semitic", but really it's just anti zionist, because to participate in this new system you WILL be monitored. Unless you know this and integrate these themes to become immortal, seeing them for what they are instead of them moving you, you move it, at least personally. You don't stop the script collectively, those who participate in that side will be sucked in. I don't want that to happen but it will. Watch it. Mark my words it WILL happen. There will be more and more segregation of people and mass either killing or deportation of people who aren't keeping up tradition. Imagine this highly tolerant world we live in now except THE EXACT OPPOSITE. You and me might not buy into the propaganda, and in fact if you're living life as yourself this probably won't impact you to any significant degree, just remember this is the overarching experience THAT YOU CAN MOSTLY BYPASS THROUGH OPERATING OUT OF IT. That's what's on the way in less than 8 years and the constitution will be re-written to support this under the new system that will be put in place to protect the people. My guess is this. Noahide laws, just as I wrote out back in 2021 as the goal of Israel. All nations turn against Israel, in which case they will then integrate within the new law system in the US, and probably global. These years will suck for anyone against the system, such as myself, because I knew about all of this well over a decade in advance. Every great revolution/war ends up in policy change, EVERY TIME. It will happen again, to us. Watch it happen. I am correct and you will see this play out. We don't have to experience this to any degree that would be scary if we're being ourselves, we will be able to skirt around this stuff and it won't cause us suffering, but also keep in mind that for a while there will be economic booms from around this time onwards in future. Likely because of technological advances, I'd guess, but I don't know exactly I just know that there will be another boom in the false economy. It won't be for us though, it will be for silicon valley and the likes. Graphics rendering tech will shift towards tensor processing as a primary means.

I'm not manifesting any of this. This is collective condition playing out with a fixed function cycle that's BUILT INTO our existence. In 2028, there will be another OBVIOUS false flag attack, and the people who aren't sucked into media propaganda and know the difference will see through that, and they will see the errors, and they will KNOW that it's just a script being played out. That's how this should all be viewed. Scrap everything I said about being responsible for saving the world, that was my qi stagnation talking like a fool justifying the conditioning from narrow view. You're able to bypass this almost entirely, just by living the life you want and ignoring it. That's not your game to play, Don't fight against it, see it as just background noise to be discarded as not important. My error was thinking that there's necessary moves to make but that's not for us that's the script to play out what it's needing to play out. Revelation is cyclic, which I proposed a long time ago in an old notebook entry but now it's plain as day to me. It's not JUST cyclic, but that's how it'll manifest for most of us. Each seal of scripture opens in 4 years increments. 2028-2032-3036-2040. Each one will have a major event that will shake up order, but in reality that's how you awaken to YOUR order, because it makes you step back and question what's going on. That's the built in self correction mechanism that's the macrocosmic reflection of the inner one. Screw all this negative trash, that's just pre-determined collective stuff but guess what, because you're integrated within that, you can build your own experience of it. That's not to say it won't happen for others, and that they won't suffer and all that, but you won't be impacted by it because you'll be on a different thematic composition building a different experience vs those who get sucked into what's being given to them. You deny that is an influence and you manifest something new, something great, even if the whole damn world falls down around you.

Note. The ancient Chinese/Orientals were actually the same people as the Sumerians.

Farming and agriculture and husbandry and all that stuff exploded in the 34th century BC after the Gihan flood. That's the time of the end of the major vapor canopy. There's been multiple floods. Book of Enoch talks about "the watchers" who came and provided these sciences to the people. The watches (some call the Annunaki) came from supposedly mount Aris. The source of genetic mixing was from these Annuna.

3319BC. The beginning of the bible, which is about the light people, as I've irrefutably proven. Why? The flood. The earth HAD BECOME without form and void. Be aware, I've studied the Hebrew here and when it says "the earth was without form" it's relating to an event which PRECEDED GENESIS 1. That's what I concluded from the study I did way back in mid 2021. The bible supports that people were here on earth before the light people. You see, when it mentions God in the bible it's also according to some relating to the creation of certain benefactors that existed on earth who restored the heavens and the earth. Then you've got the alchemy, the circulating of air and earth, the descent of the substances into form. Then NG says that this points to the soul coming into the body. There's SO MANY INTERPRETATIONS AND THEY'RE ALL VALID. The chronology points to the physical history, and the alchemy points to the metaphysical analysis. Understanding both is necessary for the full picture. The Adam and Eve reset are the light people that came from the mountains (not aliens in spacecraft that's all trash that needs to get lost) is when a new people almost magically spawned on earth for the next phase of the procession of the elements of consciousness. This moment is the 120th year (after the 3439 Gihan flood) before the so called Annunaki showed up, whatever they are, who seemed to have manifested advanced people on earth. All we know is that they're light, very bright, like walking stars. They were worshipped as gods, just like the US military was on the islands in the cargo cult. This 120 year time passage marks the moment that the pre-adamites sought to apparently take out Enlil, the female Annunaki form, whatever we're going to call them. These forms that were manifestations of the factors that manifested humans as we are, but not THE FIRST humans, because there were Cro-Magnons before then, who were white like us too, interestingly but I'll get to that later. This moment was 414 years before the pyramids were started with their construction in 2905BC. The pyramids took 90 years to finish in the year 2815BC. 180 months. There's a ton of source material that confirms these dates by the way, including the established system too so. The 414 years is 3 reset cycles. Stephen Jones, who is a bible chronologist, wrote in "the secrets of time" and called this period a "cursed earth" period. Strange enough right. This guy has the reset cycles pretty spot on and comes up with the dates that many cataclysms show up. As I've said, this has many sources which all collate to confirm this time period.

The reflection of 3319BC is 9133BC and the negation of 3319 to this is 5814. Why is this significant? The great pyramid according to David Davidson in "great pyramid and its divine message" says that this is the height in inches of that pyramid. Technically it's a "pyramid inch" but it's almost the same as a standard inch, but slightly longer. This unit of measurement is found inside the antechamber of the pyramid on a granite leaf. This has actually been known since the 1880's. This isn't new or made up. 9133BC might be the beginning of this entire reality for all we know. Everything in reality runs in cycles. That's what I decoded wayyyy back in 2019 when I was studying aetheric physics and realized that it's all about cycles within cycles. This is how geometry is formed and all the components that make up what we call as "electricity" are aspects of this, just like we are. There's more than one format of electric current, some are superluminal and others are slower than C and they all disperse through a spark gap in different geometries. Some can turn into flames and others into conventional arcs. Electric fields are very interesting things to study. Every part of reality contains every other part of it within, which is the insanely precise design of this place where it's ALL fractal where everything contains everything else. It's perfect. You can't make this stuff up.

3175BC. This date is significant because Maria Scholten shows in a book (I don't have source for this so keep with grain of salt) that ancient South American ruins such as Machu Pichu and a bunch of others around the region all show being a part of a grid type pattern which when measured against the tilt of the earth when calculating the rotation of the earth at baseline reveals that this time period was the time period that these were built. Very interesting find.

Stonehenge. This is an interesting place too. It's once again another fractal calendar, like the pyramids. This is why I considered the Celts who were up in Britain at the time to be more than just savage barbarians because they likely had connection to the site. The focus of stonehenge is actually about the month of May, which is when the resets happen. Carn Enoch is the name that's given to these other big stones around the site. There's a passage in the book of Jasher which talks about this too. My notes say "The Book of Jasher mentions the reference to Stonehenge in the context of Enoch's 45th year reign and megalithic sites around the period 456 through 490 (3439 BC to 33), describing Enoch's ministry and the building of monumental complexes. It includes details about the origins of the bluestones from Wales (Caen Enoch) and connects to megalithic structures like Stonehenge, with Chapter 34 of Enoch specifically about Stonehenge, describing a "glorious device" toward the north. The Book of Jasher also recounts divine instructions given by Enoch for building such monumental complexes, linking Enoch's rule to the construction of these ancient sites.". There's actually multiple works which are all considered as "stonehenge". Stonehenge original if we'd call it that was built in the 70th year of Enoch's reign which was after the bluestones. There's a whole book focused on this actually that I can't remember what it's called but it's there in my notes somewhere.

" Stonehenge I (Outer Sarcen Ring)
30 sarcen pillars
30 sarcen lintils
1. Megalithic sarcen ring forms 360-degree circle of contiguous stone, identifying the
archaic 360-day year.
2. Ancients divided the 360 degrees of heaven into 12 regions (Zodiac). The 30 lintils
(raised in air signifying heaven) x 12 is 360, representing the astronomical year.
3. The 30 massive pillars are the foundation supporting the raised lintils, each pillar having
4 sides: 30 x 4 is 120. . . the FOUNDATION number (a third of 360).
4. Each 6-sided stone has 8 corner angles. The 30-sarcen pillars have 240 total corner
angles, but only 120 are visible (120 buried underground).
5. Each of the 6-sided lintils was attached end-to-end with advanced tongue-in-groove
locks, eliminating 2 planes on each stone for a total of 120 visible planes. Each lintil
maintains a spherical curvature forming a perfect raised ring, unlike anything else found
among ancient megalithic architecture.
6. In antiquity holy men were regarded as pillars (pillar of the community) who supported
heaven (men means stone: i.e. menhir) as in the Book of Revelation where the redeemed
among men shall become “. . .pillars in the temple of God,” a pillar being the symbol of
a repository of divine knowledge. The number of MAN is 6 in the LAST book of the
Bible (Revelation) and in the FIRST book (Genesis), mankind was created on 6th day.
Thus, the 60-sarcen pillars and lintils, each having 6 planes (60 x 6 = 360), links the
concepts of MANKIND and TIME.
7. Total sum of corner angles and planes of the 30 lintils in the outer ring was 420,
however, only 360 were visible due to their attachment end-to-end.
8. The 120 visible corner angles of the sarcen pillars combined with the 240 visible joints of the lintil corner angles are 360 total visible angles in the outer sarcen ring of Stonehenge.
9. The outer sarcen ring’s PLANES and CORNER ANGLES combined together in sections
6, 7 and 8, above, demonstrate the sum of 360 three different ways, for a total of 1080
(360 x 3): GREAT PYRAMID FINISHED 2815 BC, OR 1080 ANNUS MUNDI.
10. Total dimensional computation of sarcen ring’s pillars and lintils (480 angles and 360
planes multiplied against each other) is 86,400, the precise sum of seconds in a day, the
second being the lowest ancient denominator of time and 864 is the foundation of time
number in seconds, minutes, hours, days, months and years. There are many crop circles
formed near Stonehenge that employ geometrical dimensions that mathematically equate
to 864 and its variants (see Crop Circle Calendrical Codes).
11. Sarcen ring’s 30-pillared divisions x 360 produces 10,800.
12. Sarcen ring’s total of 60 stones (pillars and lintils) x 360 produces 216,000, the exact
sum of days in a 600-year period (Great Year or Anunnaki NER period); the
reoccurrence of 60 and its multiples denotes a connection to the Sumerian sexagesimal
system.

The outer sarcen ring of Stonehenge embodies the concept of Original Time in the
beginning of Men, the 360-day terrestrial year synchronized perfectly with the 360 degrees of the celestial sphere. Not coincidentally, the outer circular embankment around the site (ditch and wall) has a diameter of 360 feet.(4)
The sarcen ring identifies the calendrical units by which the rest of Stonehenge (the
Trilithons) and its later additions (Bluestones) employ in its calendrical messages. These units of time encoded within the dimensions of the outer sarcen ring are:
1 day (86,400 seconds)
60 days (86,400 minutes)
120 days (and years)
360 days (8640 hours; and years)
30 years (10,800 days)
600 years (216,000 days; Great Year)
1080 years (Annus Mundi year Great Pyramid finished in 2815 BC)

Stonehenge I (Trilithons)
These inner monoliths are virtual rock giants, and the best-preserved features of the
Stonehenge complex. They are sarcen stones, 24 feet high and up to 45 tons. The Trilithons are formed of 10 pillars, forming a horseshoe topped with five lintils. These lintils are not connected to one another as they are in the outer sarcen ring, giving one the distinct impression of five great Ages.

The Five Trilithons are like five portals, forming the Inner Sanctuary of Stonehenge.
Their distribution forms an ancient geometrical symbol for the Creator, derived in antiquity from the belief that the Eye of God was the polestar, the only star in the heavens that did not move, with all stars encircling it since the Earth’s axial line pointed directly at it. To the ancients this gave off the impression that all the stars in the sky worshipped the Polestar. The Trilithons first form this five-point geometry, but the star symbol itself is formed also by the four Station Stones outside the sarcen ring, and the long line intersects within the Trilithons to form this ancient sign for God.

The total corner angles of all 15 trilithons are 120 (15 x 8). Because the trilithons depict a
pentagram with 5 corner angles, we find produced the sum of 600 (120 x 5). 600 years was a Great Year, also known as an Anunnaki NER. The Great Flood of 2239 BC was the 600th regnal year of the Anunnaki Kings who began to rule in 2839 BC, 600 years after they descended to Earth in 3439 BC."

That's what I've got which I copied from a book called "annunaki homeworld", which by the way has no connections to the aliens idea. There's a LOT MORE I could go into with this but that's not for this. There's almost too much to decode.

The word Saturn apparently relates to the Egyptian god Set, which also overlaps with the term "Typhon" which also relates to the "phene". This is said to be connected to the geometries of reality. Saturn is structure. Geometry. The very personified patterning of reality itself which contains all things, and arguably IS all things. The alchemist has said many times that "this is all the work of Saturn". The connections we draw from the druids in Britain overlaps with this data. Jacobs pillow. It's said that the book of Enoch was written in the far north, not where the rest of scripture was written. I consider the book of Jasher and Enoch, and also probably Jubilees as another real text that's not just made up to sell juu Christian doctrine.

The Mayan long count calendar. This one ends in 2046. Very soon. It wasn't 2012, it was dated incorrectly. These are the real end times. There's a Chinese calendar which overlaps this date too, and Enoch references once again as well as the Sumerian (the same people but an earlier calendar) calendar. All of these different calendars show up after the Gihan flood which was 34th century BC. 3113BC was when this one was made. It points to 2046 with 1,872,000 turnings of the stars. It's all cycles within cycles, This calendar references 13 heavens which are each a cycle of 400 years and this was then divisible by 360 turnings of the stars meaning each cycle was 144000 days. 13X144000 days = 1,872,000 days. November 1st 2046, which is the end of the calendar, apparently an "invasion of demons" are going to arise from the underworld, according to the Mayan prophesies. "Time will collapse", which apparently means that we will have 16 hour days from then on. "A time" by the way in the bible can relate to 60 days, as is the chronology on various ancient calendars, which relates the opening of the last seal as a period of 60 days from then before the complete end of the reality is over. 2106AD. Why does everything in this world seem to happen like it's planned? Because it IS. These fools in academia want you to think these Mayans were wild savages. "Ritual sacrifice". Remember at the time of the 7th seal opening in the book of revelation there will be Satan who is "loosed for a time". This relates to the demon called El Shaddai shown in the book of Job, the adversary. The beast kingdom begins in 2046 and lasts 60 years. In the 2nd trumpet judgement it will be when "wormwood" appears. This wormwood is likely overlapping the Mayan prophesy of the shortening of the days by 1/3 by the way. It can't be coincidence. This whole place is one big pre-determined movie that you're all playing into not realizing it's all coming through you. This has been the message of RS since the start. To be yourself without compromise we must be spontaneous, follow intuitive impulse, which is our own reliable connection to the inner guidance mechanism outside this metaphysical interface system. This shortening of the days likely relates to a passage about "the shortening of those days for the elect sake". The chosen ones. 2Ti 2:10 "Therefore I endure all things for the elect's sakes, that they may also obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus with eternal glory." Mat_24:22 "And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened."

Those who say this is all written by men have no idea, Some claim the gospels were written by men who wanted to control us. I've read those books, and they make good cases at face value, but the adding up of patterns and chronology, this can't be made up. What is the meaning of all of this? It's to bring awareness to you of these facts so you can understand that the world is a metaphysical reality which is geometric and pre-planned with how it's designed to unfold. We didn't manifest the world, it was here before us, and we overlap it. Overlapping processes within processes, states within states, components within components, geometries within geometries. It's all thematic elements interacting and overlapping and forming unique formats of experience which we're decoding through our receptors in the metaphysical wu xing interface overlay unfolding light into various wavelengths and overlapping those aetheric perturbances with wave interferometry forming the fractal reception of your consciousness within all pieces of the entire scope of reality itself. How wild is that. You heard it here first on RS. The REAL mechanics,

108 + 108 + 36. The field geometry of water, a perfect triangle. Gone over this way back in 2019. 3100 is the date everybody (including those in academia) talks about Narmer (meaning Pyramid by the way) which by the way is the 108th year of Enoch's reign in Egypt. 108. The pyramid number. 138, the reset number. 144, another magic number. I've never been a fan of numbers like this but you can't ignore the overlaps. 3103BC is by the way when the Vedic kali yuga calendar began. Enoch was 170 years old at this time. That's 2040 months, which is the date of the next cycle. These calendars were all created within 18 years of each other (108?) between 3163BC and 3103BC, all of those systems came into our reality. This is right around the time that civilization as we consider it today took off and is recognized in the conventional record. The calendars were all made. This all occurred within 60 years, a time. 2046-2106. The end of the world, which by the way 2046 is the date the calendars point to as the end of time. 60 years. Wow I just noticed that. Interesting right.

Greek Atlantis was 13th century BC by the way.

Interesting overlap. During the time the great pyramid was being built, the first dynasty of China was founded 2852BC which was the dynasty of the 5 monarchs but there were 9 rulers at this time. The Chinese claim that their first dynasties were 646 years which is very close to the 670 years that the Sumerians claim to be ruled by their kings. The Sumerian prism says that 241200 shars was their time in ruling and that's then divided by 360 days per year and you get 670 years. 670*360 = 241200 shars. Overlap coincidence? This Chinese dynasty was ruled by dragon kings, which apparently means "bearded" kings, which was pretty much at the same time as the 7 kings were ruling Sumer. It's said by most scholars that Chinese and Sumerian pictographs are basically leading from the same source. Ignatius Donnelly wrote in the 1800's, (mind you he was also in congress at the time interestingly enough), that the Chinese came into contact with a superior race of demigods. There's a work he wrote called "Atlantis: the antediluvian world" and quotes "The early history of China indicates contact with a superior race. ‘Fuh‑hi, who is regarded as a demi‑god, founded the Chinese Empire 2852 B.C. He introduced cattle, taught the people how to raise them, and taught the art of writing." as well as "He might have invented his alphabet, but he did not invent the cattle; he must have got them from some nation who, during many centuries of civilization, had domesticated them; and from what nation was he more likely to have obtained them than from the Atlanteans, whose colonies we have seen reached his borders, and whose armies invaded his territory!". This is relating to the same time period as we're talking about before, after 3100BC. En-Ki, Fuh-Hi? Similar names? In mythology they both speak about creating humans, that they survived floods, taught the people about how to farm and use more advanced technologies, were gods/demi-gods and had serpent type symbolism. "That old serpent".

Rev12:9 "And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him."

Interesting connection huh. That old serpent. The gods who created humans, were claimed to have flooded the world, are referred to as dragons or serpents, who live in the earth, and have angels, and who deceives the whole world. The juize, who play the roles of those who play out this will on the earth for these gods, who are almost untouchable. I mean Christ in the gospels calls the Juize the seed of Satan who is their father, so.

2839BC. Man there's too many dates to go over. I can't even.

Oh wait, I remember. The vimana, the Vedic flying machines that were written about ages ago. The Chinese also talked about these flying machines too.

The entire biblical text is about the history and the metaphysical history of consciousness. Existing inside the process and unfolding it all (through multiple iterations to gain experience of all of these aspects which they overlap and to integrate them) AS WELL AS "accelerating" this process as the alchemist says using processes such as gazing and whatnot ARE ALL FUNCTIONALLY UNFOLDING THE SAME PATTERN ARE THEY NOT? If the physical history reflects the very alchemical patterning of the substances which we're processing through on a metaphysical level then wouldn't just existing also play this out as well? Yeah? Makes sense to me. We're all processing the overarching process with all component processes within them.

Another point. It's said that in medieval times the women with babies would sleep with them so that these fairies as they're called wouldn't snatch their children and replace them with something else. Interesting hey.

Richard L Thompson (PH.D mathematician) wrote in a book called "Vedic Cosmology and Astronomy" where he says that the Vedic people accurately measured the circumference of the earth and the ecliptic plane rotation. How would this have been possible with primitive ancient people? Us existing as creations of gods that came out of the earth here according to the lore we've gathered, is the collective scenario of this experience of the dynamic unfolding of all the thematic elements possible for us. This is the scenario we live in, and it's the grand stage play, as NG says. "for the work to be done in him". Now another point is that 2800BC was the 15th year of the great pyramid being built, and considering how aligned the pyramids are with the stars and the geometry, it wouldn't surprise me. Thing is, these people who built these must've known everything about the metaphysical nature of this system. 2778BC. This is the start of the Egyptian chronology, which was made 37 years after the great pyramid was built. 2699BC. This is the 414th year of the Mayan long calendar, which is the cursed earth chronology that's outlined in the guy I mentioned before "Stephen Jones" in the book "the secrets of time". 414 is 3 reset cycles. We know that from already established histories, including the most recent one, that quite advanced tech for the time begins to appear. Same thing likely happened after each reset. There was a benefactor to rebalance the pressure cycles and restore order for a while which leads to "good times" and then things begin to suck again and so it repeats with the compromise patterns being broken and whatnot. Personal-collective process of self transformation. This date by the way, is the time that's given to when ancient Chinese civilization beginning with their calendar. This is the post "traditional" period which was what we were talking about before, as the Sumerians. What's insane to me is that around this time is when TCM showed up. Nai Ching, the book of medicine showed up around 2650BC. They also had a book of maps. There's a book called "1421" which is about Chinese fleets sailing around the world mapping all this geography. More interesting data. Seems that the Israelites AKA light people weren't the only sea farers.

There's an old book from 1827 called "Celtic Druids" written by George Higgins (one I've been through a bit of a while back) talked about how Stonehenge and the other stone circles all encoded the geometry of a 60 year cycle. We once again pointed to that before, the 60 year cycle after 2046 to the end of reality itself in 2106. These stone circles were built during the reign of Enoch remember, when all these ancient calendars started within that same time period, 60 years. The 60 year period was a part of the Sumerian dating system. Herbert Chatley, who's a Chinese historian and engineer, notes that the 60 year period which was venerated in ancient China originated around 2637BC, 2647 is when another big reset happened (a very very major cataclysm that destroyed a lot), once again in the same century as most of these other discoveries in China coming to surface. There's coding in the geometry of how the interface is being driven by greater process. How did I miss this for so many years despite having known this years before creating RS and making all this stuff on manifestation. It's crazy. I mean what a crazy link that I go into studying history of Britain with the druids and then this stuff shows up in my "forbidden history" folder. Good thing I've got most of this on DVD backups.

Plutarch wrote "The number 60 is the first of measures for those persons as concerned themselves with the heavenly bodies" and "The early Egyptians represented the 60 year cycle as a crocodile". Remember, a single turning of the stars at night to those people was measuring the cycle of a day, and Alpha Draconis (eye of the dragon/center of God) referenced a crocodile AKA a "dragon". These people of ancient Egypt were likely counting crocodiles. Interesting note. 60 crocodiles was one cycle of the turning of the eye of the dragon. Many mentions of 60. I thought I was just making this up but not really. There's probably tons of other references I've got here that I've not found yet. There's obviously now a clear reason why all these ancient people were SO HEAVILY FOCUSED ON ASTRONOMY. It's NOT about "astrology" but in fact, following the stars because they map the metaphysical process of reality itself. Astrology as the alchemist notes is the study of the inner stars, which obviously exist on the outer too, and that's the study of how they overlap and process. They followed the stars because these stars revealed when they would be destroyed, the metaphysical countdown of Armageddon. The Mongols and the Tartars and the Manchu people all had calendars that followed 60 year cycles as well, interestingly.

2359BC. This is 120 years before the great flood. You know what this means? 60+60 year cycles. Noah is warned in the bible that the flood will occur in 120 days. Pentagrams are 10 angles of 108 degrees by the way. If you extrapolate this into 3D you get a pyramid. 1080 degrees.

18/9/25

I believe there's a way to improve HD.

Scratch that.

I've got so much more data I don't think I'll ever get even 10% of this on the notebook it's insane. Like the amount of data I've found is unbelievable. I've decoded so much more my brain is overflowing at this point with all kinds of new levels of insight, mostly relating to lining up historical events to scripture etc. Most books written pre-1920 are where the juicy stuff is at. It's the old books that contain the non-sanitized facts. Maps of the old world for example, reveal to us that modern science is totally backwards.

Here's some notes from some interesting connections between Greeky mythos.

"Apollo is the father of Coronus, a king of Sicily. (The White Goddess p. 52). Aesculapius is represented carrying a staff entwined with oracular snakes. (The White Goddess p. 52) The Greeks held that Apollo was the same as Dionysus, that they were the same figure. (The White Goddess p. 257) In fact, just as Apollo’s wife was Coronis, the wife of Dionysus wore the crown Corona Borealis. (The White Goddess p. 99) Godfry Higgins in 1836 in Analcalypsis wrote that Horace asserted that Apollo and Dionysus were the same. (p. 45) Both Apollo and Dionysius were gods of the solar year. (White Goddess p. 227) In Bulfinch’s Mythology we learn that Apollo was associated with Helios. (p. 884) Robert Graves wrote that Helios was regarded as the Demiurge and that the Orphics identified this deity as their god Apollo. (The White Goddess p. 249). Both Apollo and Dionysus are said to be the father of Phaethon, who caused the sun to lose its course when the four-horsed solar chariot lost control. Apollo Helios. (The White Goddess pgs. 127-128, 320) The identity of Apollo as Dionysus unlocks more meaning from The Mysteries of which the Book of Revelation is descended. Dionysus is the god of wine, ivy and grapes, specifically its intoxication. He is the Patron of Theater. His is a "spiritual intoxication." He is the Roman god Bacchus."

Phaethon. I've heard that name before. Apollo Helios. Also this.

"In the early times of the Oracle at Delphi, Apollo was not a sun-god, but was regarded as an underworld oracular hero. A figure of ORACLES in the underworld (p. 53). "

The book is written by a guy named Robert Graves. Copy pasting this stuff from notepad documents is a nightmare because the formatting is totally whacked, Apollyon is the destroyer, Apollo, Helios, Phaethon. As far as I remember Phaethon means one who "wanders the hollows", or the underworld. This confirms what this text said above. This can't be an accident. It was after 538BC that Apollo became a sun god. Why? do the math. It's a reset year.

"The Greeks held that Apollo was the same as Dionysus, that they were the same figure. (The White Goddess p. 257) In fact, just as Apollo’s wife was Coronis, the wife of Dionysus wore the crown Corona Borealis. (The White Goddess p. 99) Godfry Higgins in 1836 in Analcalypsis wrote that Horace asserted that Apollo and Dionysus were the same. (p. 45) Both Apollo and Dionysius were gods of the solar year. (White Goddess p. 227) In Bulfinch’s Mythology we learn that Apollo was associated with Helios. (p. 884) Robert Graves wrote that Helios was regarded as the Demiurge and that the Orphics identified this deity as their god Apollo. (The White Goddess p. 249). Both Apollo and Dionysus are said to be the father of Phaethon, who caused the sun to lose its course when the four-horsed solar chariot lost control. Apollo Helios. (The White Goddess pgs. 127-128, 320)"

Here's some bombshells. To everybody who continues to deny that the Juize are the ones that are propagating all of this trash we see in the world then you'll have to chew on this one for a while and swallow the meat and try not to choke. I will make all of these people appear to be grasping at air to make a case against this fact. and then some, just like I did with proving the NG mentalism cult to be utterly insane.

"When all the company requested and earnestly begged it of him; first of all (says he), the time and manner of the greatest and most holy solemnity of the Jews is exactly agreeable to the holy rites of Dionysos; for that which they call the Fast they celebrate in the midst of the vintage, furnishing their tables with all sorts of fruits, while they sit under tabernacles made of branches of the vine and ivy intertwined, which they call sukkot."

This is from Plutarch "convivial questions" book 4 chapter 6. I'm not done yet.

Tacitus (yeah that Tacitus once again) says in histories book 5 chapter 6 "Therefore they erect no statues in their cities, still less in their temples; flattery not being paid to their kings, nor honour to our Caesars. Yet because their priests chanted, sounding pipes and cymbals, and wearing ivy garlands, and a golden vine was discovered in their Temple, they were thought to be devotees of the worship of Father Liber (Dionysus), conqueror of the East, despite the incongruity of their customs. For Liber established joyous festive rites, while those of the Jewish people are vulgar and unmusical."

There's more.

"Some say that the Jews were fugitives from the island of Crete at the time when Saturn was driven from his throne by the power of Jupiter; the name is said to be derived from Idaei, the name of the people who lived around Mount Ida in Crete. Others assert that they were a race of Ethiopian origin... Others again say that they were a people of illustrious origin who were driven out of Egypt by the rulers of the land... Most writers agree that once they were settled in their new homes, they built a city and dedicated a temple."

"Others say that proscribed and banished Egyptians, under the leadership of Hierosolymus and Juda, came and occupied the country. Their religious practices are said to be opposed to those of all other nations. Things sacred with us are profane with them, and things held criminal by us are lawful with them. They allow their own gods no images, no temples, no country. They set apart the seventh day as sacred, because that day brought them rest from their labours."

"Some think that the Jewish worship is derived from the cult of Dionysus (Father Liber), because of the following evidence: they use the ram’s horn and cymbals; they are crowned with ivy; and a golden vine was found in their temple. These things are all typical of Dionysiac rites. But this seems improbable; for Dionysus established joyful festivals, while the customs of the Jews are mean, sordid, and gloomy."

Chew on that one. Jews worshipping a cult of Dionysus. This isn't taken out of context which is why I quoted multiple passages. I could easily just quote simple passages to be concise but I don't want to seem like I'm grasping at air so the context is revealed. This is once again more proof of whacked stuff. So, was this a forged passage? Probably not, considering the parallels, but once again we need to be aware of possible re-writings but as I said it seems that these things exist in these texts for a reason.

I've got notes that Pliny the elder also wrote on this connection too but I can't find source material to back it up, but it wouldn't surprise me once again. So with this connection we can clearly see there's links between the Jewish god and Bacchus, Apollo, Helios. Helios is a very interesting connection. Helios is an underworld god, now considered to be a solar god. This has profound impacts when it comes to interpreting the mythos and the substances represented as these personifications.

"Valerius Maximus records that about the year 139 B.C. the Praetor of Foreigners, C. Cornelius Hispallus, expelled from Rome certain Jews who were 'trying to corrupt Roman morals by a pretended cult of Sabazian Jove'. The inference is that the Praetor did not expel them for a legitimate worship of this god, but because they foisted novelties on the Thracian cult—probably circumcision, which was regarded by the Romans as self-mutilation and a corruption of morals—for they admitted aliens to their Sabbaths. (P. 335)"

Sounds like what the Austrian painter did. Juize corrupting morals by a pretended cult. Remember everyone, the first tranny clinics opened in the Weimar Republic.

"According to Leclercq's Manual of Christian Archaeology, burials in the cemetery of Praetextatus at Rome confirm this cult of a Jewish Sabazius. That the Jews of the Dispersion may have used false etymology to equate 'Sabazius' with 'Sabaoth'— Jehovah was the Lord of the Sabbath, and also of Sabaoth, 'of hosts'— does not disprove the original identity of the two gods. Sabazian Zeus and Sabazian Dionysus were different names of the same character,"

Another connection here. The Juize use false etymology to fool the Romans. "Lord of hosts". We hear that ALL THE TIME in scripture. I've heard of this before, about how "God" in the bible is actually referring to multiple different deities under different contexts, relating to who's referring to God in that case would be different from other passages. I've known that for a long time but I never caught on. The Romans threw out the Juize in response to this corruption of their people. Doesn't that sound similar? It's the same story. Juize vs Israelites. Israel vs Judea.

"If so, it seems probable that the concealed disc was engraved spirally with her own Holy and Ineffable Name as the Libyao-Pelasgian Goddess of Wisdom; and if this Name was spelt in letters, not hieroglyphs, it may have been either the five-letter IEUOA, or the seven-letter JIEUOAO, formed by doubling the first and last letters of IEUOA. Or, since she was the triple Moon-goddess, namely the Three Fates who invented the five vowels, together with F and H, it may have been a nine-letter form JIEHUOV(F)A6, composed to contain not only the seven-letter Name but also the two consonants, representing the first and last days of her week, which revealed her as Wisdom, hewer-out of the Seven Pillars. If it was JIEHUOVAO, Simonides (or more likely his predecessor Pythagoras) showed little inventiveness in stabilizing the eight-letter form JEHUOVAO in honour of the Immortal Sun-god Apollo, by the omission of I, the death-vowel, while retaining Y, the semi-vowel of generation."

Well that's a surprise. The Juize hijacked the names of other gods to hide their own. Is that not what this is outlining?

I've got notes here that the alchemists were Juize. How does that work? I need to dig deeper, because if the meanings of these embodied thematic currents represent substances that aren't clear according to the texts then something is off about these alchemical traditions. I've already been questioning the alchemist on many themes and yet he has no answers. The discrepancy is immense. I KNOW that gazing raises liver yang. IRREFUTABLY. I've studied TCM so much that I know exactly which meridian is activated from this because I've felt all the sensations, and my connection between TCM and gazing has been a first as far as I know.

"Dionysus Sabazius was the original Jehovah of the Passover; and Plutarch also identifies the Jehovah of the Feast of Tabernacles with Dionysus Liber, or Lusios ('he who frees from guilt'), the Wine-god, by suggesting that the word 'Levite' is formed from Lusios; and he says that the Jews abstain from swine's flesh because their Dionysus is also Adonis, who was killed by a boar. The rituals of Jehovah and Dionysus, as Plutarch pointed out, corresponded closely: mysteries of barley-sheaves and new wine, torch dances until cock-crow, libations, animal sacrifices, religious ecstasy. (P. 336)"

"There is even numismatic evidence for the identification of Jehovah and Dionysus: a silver coin of the fifth century B.C., (which appears in G. F. Hill's Catalogue of the Greek Coins of Palestine) found near Gaza with on the obverse a bearded head of Dionysus type and on the reverse a bearded figure in a winged chariot, designated in Hebrew characters JHWH—Jehovah. This is not, of course, by any means the whole story of Jehovah, whose affinity with other gods, especially Cronos (Bran), has already been mentioned. It is easiest perhaps to write about him in terms of days of the week (P. 336)."

There's so many references. Bearded heads, relate to dragons in China, white race genes. Crocodiles in Egypt. Serpents in the east. "Reptiles".

"His first pictorial appearance is at the copperworkings of Ras-Shamra in Sinai in a carving of about the sixteenth century B.C. He is then Elath-Iahu a Kenite Smith-god, the God of Wednesday, presumably the lover of Baalith the local Aphrodite and Goddess of Friday. Later in his theophanies at Moreh, Hebron and Ophrah he is the terebinth-god Bel, the God of Thursday. The story of his defeat of the prophets of Carmel concerns the conquest of his Bel aspect by Cronos the God of Saturday in the person of Elijah. Bel and Cronos are always appearing in opposition, Bel being Beli and Cronos, Bran; as has been shown. 'When Israel was in Egypt', Jehovah was Set, the God of Sunday. At the Jerusalem feast of Tabernacles, on the Day of Willows, he was the God of Monday, His name El, connected with the scarlet oak, proves him to have been also the God of Tuesday. Thus the universality claimed for him by the Pharisees and typified by the Menorah, the seven-branched candlestick, rests on a solid enough mythological basis. (P. 336-337)"

El. All the "Baal" references I've heard way back when don't even scratch the surface here. This etymology must have root somewhere.

"Dionysus was the barley god. Graves wrote that, ‘Jehovah was preeminently a protector of barley- the Passover was a barley harvest.’ (The White Goddess p. 336) Dionysus Sabazius was the original Jehovah of the Passover. (The White Goddess p. 336) Plutarch wrote that the rituals of Dionysus and Jehovah correspond closely. (The White Goddess p. 336)"

"Jehovah as Lord of Sabbath, the counting of sevens, is mirrored in Dionysus Sabazius, and the number seven was important in Apollo worship. Hymns were sun got Apollo every seven days just as modern Church services and synagogues hold worship services every seven days. Encyclopedia Brittanica, 1902 (APOLLO) pg. 185, The Worship of the Dead, p. 235)"

What a surprise. Again.

"Godfrey Higgins in 1836, in Anacalypsis, wrote that the IE on the Delphic temple inscription is the same as in the title, Apollo Can-ia, or IA, the JAH of the Jews, and that Apollo described from A-pol, or the more ancient e-bol, or the god Baal. (Anacalypsis p. 589)"

Right on queue. Baal. We were just talking about Baal. What another wonderful surprise. It's funny because Mark Passio must be wrong about Baal, at least according to these texts. I went through his 16 hour lecture on natural law (I have it burned on DVD) and he connected Satan with Baal. Guess he's wrong. Satan-iel, El, Baal. The cherub. There are many connections between Satan AKA the adversary and Baal but it seems that's not the only one. Who's right? I don't know, but knowing scripture and how stupidly complex it is I wouldn't be surprised if "God" is mentioned as multiple different beings. When I can go through the documentation on ancient alchemical traditions and the connections here to these terms and the renaming of thematic substances then perhaps I can understand better. I drew pretty firm conclusions about what these meant but as always I'm willing to be proven wrong if enough data can show otherwise. The alchemy doesn't recognize physical history as how we analyze is not. Nobody in my private inner alchemical circles agrees with me about this history. Too bad really, I'm at conflict with my own initiates. I say, prove me wrong, or in this case, the data. This isn't about me vs you or anyone else, this is about the data, the geometry, the patterns. The cycles of thematic processes. So much of what those people brought to the table has been either flat out wrong or half truths at best. The deepest truth MUST fit the pattern of ALL OTHER data, because every function of truth contains every other element of truth in it. If you come up against a contradiction and cannot explain it then you must be wrong. This is what I thrive on, willingly running up against contradicting data and seeing what fits and what doesn't, because that's the ONLY way you come to understand truth, objectively, about the pattern of reality.

If NG and his "I AM" which comes from the burning bush encounter with Moses which turns out to be historically speaking a different intelligence then we have a conflict with core doctrine and NG must be fundamentally wrong then. There's hundreds of these conflicts, how do you draw conclusions when everything has so many points of contrast. The people who write these claims don't look to reconcile such data, they ignore it and make profits from doing so. I don't like that, I find this to be the sign of a coward.

The Sumerians called the firmament the hammered bracelet. The deeper back in ancient history I go the more what I thought I knew falls apart. I love it. It means I'm going to reach a new level.

Jacobs ladder is the ladder of Set in the Egyptian book of the dead and also called the ladder of typhon or the ladder of phoenix or in Egypt it was Naph. Phene.

I believe that knowledge and conversation with the higher genius as the alchemist calls it, conversations in theurgy, that this is not just communicating with archetypal intelligences.

I've got a feeling that most of the so called psychological thematic meaning that these alchemical texts seem to portray is not JUST psychological.

Within 150 years of the OT was written so was the NT, the zodiac was also created along with the OT. The bible isn't what we think.

It's said that in 1902 only about 70k people died in the last reset.

The sphynx in Egypt was actually Anubis but it's been worn down. It was a dog laying down, taking commands. It symbolized the people as those dogs being good obedient slaves.

The ancient Aztecs believed in a sacred mountain place and that mountain marked the head of 9 rivers and those 9 rivers were protected by a giant dog. The 9 rivers are the 9 Egyptian bows and the holy mountains are the great pyramids and the giant dog was the sphynx.

The alchemical treatises written between the 15th-19th century with all those images mostly had globes for world images. The old maps didn't see the world that way.

The Juize are using religious systems in order to hold the balance of pressure in their favor. They're playing with the dynamics of reality in the self correction cycle to avoid mass destruction of their work on the top in enslaving everybody under banking systems. They've been gradually manipulating people over and over to keep them in a sort of sense of necessary morality to prevent the self correction mechanism of corruption balancing from destroying their built up empires. That's what I've taken away from all this. It's ALL pressure mediation, just as the physics I studied ages ago revealed to me. It's all pressure mediation. Balancing currents.

I also want to correct my last predictions of war. The 2028-2032 period will be likely pockets of conflict scattered throughout the west between Christians and Islamic aliens. This is what is going to occur. Then from 2028 onwards of course the economic situation will boom, mostly for the elite, but there will be some trickle to the people too, since economic pressure needs to be released. The Juize are immortal because they're under contract by the god of this reality to play their role. Our task is to see through it all and operate as ourselves instead of the conditioning cycles they're putting us in.

Manifestation is a scam. All is mind is a scam. The whole LOA idea is a false doctrine to sucker people into buying into the system and reaping the benefits. Higher genius probably is tapped into the demiurge to some degree, else why would the Juize get into such a position of power?

I can't shake the feeling that purification of being has to do with rejecting the Jewish system. I CAN'T GET THAT OUT OF MY BEING. It's been the very reason why I asked the question "there's got to be more to life than this" to myself back when I first started gazing. I can't shake it. We're not responsible for what happens here, yet also playing the role and BEING POLARIZED by the propaganda means you fail the test. I passes the test when I was 15, and I arguably passed it before then too. Why do some get born in with such a hared for Jews like I was? Probably because it's within me to despise the system of slavery. The difference between someone who's mastered it and operates through those means without getting polarized is that they'd be creating functional processes in their lives to act as a counterbalance to the trash. Basically the test is, can you separate from the polarization and create your own functional process in life? That's REALLY how I practically see it, next to the alchemy of course.

Manifestation is nothing more than breaking from the pre-conditioned processes that are built into this world and that you're freeing yourself from the artificial realities that you're tricked to buy into. It's not special or magical, it's simply psychological individuation through facing pressure and tests that are based on what you can clearly see and feel with what's revealed in the system. You decide who you're going to be based on what you serve, what you integrate within, what you're operating and feeding by partaking with it. Are you functional to create something new or are you running on other people's conditioning? That's the question. Are you being who you want to be and unfolding your seeds or are you compromising and holding back to stay safe in the constructed system around you trying to pull you down and devalue you every day so you accept being someone else's puppet and play toy. The dog of Egypt. Are you a dog or are you an individuated person? This is what LOA is REALLY about, it's not mentalism in a vacuum, nor is it really even how NG talked about it, though obviously he said that we will each go through all the different states, which I decipher as integrate all the substances necessary for individuation. That is immortality on a non physical level.

Tartarus also relates to the Tartars. In the original tradition of the Greek mythos the realm of Tartarus was the far west in the realm of Tartar. Tartaria. These mythos are also physically based, AKA NG is dead wrong about the bible, by a LOT. This realm of Tartar was the ancient Americas. The maritime people are the ancient Israelites, the white light people, the descendants of the Annuna. We are called the Imeru. The light people were originally named the Imaru, from Annuna, later became Tartars, or as we know now, European descendants. Israelites. Mediterranean people were sea farers, we fulfill the prophesies in the bible who spread all over the world. We are the ONLY people on earth who did this. We are also anti Jew by nature, because we're designed as a force for order and function, if nothing sabotages us which is what they're doing. The whole reality is set up this way for this purpose. Outside of Genesis, most of the bible is pro Jew. The covenant with Abraham was for the descendants of Annu, the Imeru, which if you HAVE Imeru blood, then you're under that covenant. Works on all levels.

The first Pharaoh appointed by Osiris in the book of Jasher, His name was Rikayon who was the father of Osiris. The first Ruler of Egypt in the book of Jasher is called Anam, and in Jasher it says that Anam came from Babylonia. He moved from Babylon to Egypt and his son became the first Pharaoh. Anam is the reverse of Mana which is related to the term means in Greek who is Minishtu. Prof William Waddell mentioned this same name of Anam except he never cited the book of Jasher. I don't have his source but it's there. Western Semitic is the exact reverse of Egyptian apparently in the linguistics. Athene in Greek is Neith in Egypt. Very interesting. Similar gods reverse their language between tongues. It's because in Egypt they wrote from right to left, where the Semites wrote left to right. This means that the names got reversed, but maintained the same meanings.

The Imeru were in Mauritania. King Juba was from the Imeru. There's history between these people and the Romans, and it's said that Atlantis was in that same region too. Remember that Atlantis wasn't originally underwater before, because there's been shifts in the water on earth. It's said that archaeologists in the Mediterranean regions have found over 300 sunken underwater cities. Atlantis had the disaster that sunk the city in the 14th century.

19/9/25

More corrections to make. Will update those here. I like leaving my mistakes in because it's revealing the thought at the time as well to understand the context that was present of those ideas. Also I didn't write last night here but I woke up with more geometry patterns and formations of shapes overlaying (interestingly dreamt of snakes and stuff) and then I got these ideas about how to form "Reality Synthesis 2.0". if we'd call it that using visual diagrams. EVERY time I try and come up with visuals for these ideas they fail, but when they come to me spontaneously then I get insights that are huge. That spontaneity is the point by the way. I've got it all logged down.

So my notes on the Imeru were off. I've gone through more data and corrected things. So Imeru literally means "serpent people". No surprise. In fact, the white people are the serpent people, according to the ANCIENT history. That's what we're studying here. The Ebla tablets of Tel Mardish in northwestern Syria, which are Canaanite texts written in Sumerian cuneiform show the names of Imeru. These tablets contain names familiar from biblical tradition, such as Uruz-Salimah, Jerusalem, Abramu (Abraham), Ismail, Israelu (Israel), and others. Hodder M. Westrop and C. Staniland Wake wrote published a book in 1875 called "Ancient symbol worship. Influence of the phallic idea in the religions of antiquity.". This book has various sources of discoveries. I'm not going to go over the logic and stuff here because it's not worth filling up pages with more quotes so you'll just have to take my word for it. These old books have far more data than new ones published by most academics. Studying these ancient tablets more closely should reveal more insights.

More notes. Grafton Smith wrote a book on the stone burial chambers in Egypt that look like flat top pyramids and comparing them to the ones in Britain and concluded they're the same construction and likely made by the same people. This was in 1913 by the way. Mortima Wheeler, a Harvard university professor none the less who also fought in the British army in the 2 world wars, said that the findings Smith made were "too close to be together accidental", referring to the similarities. Please do not that once again I have no source material for this one. My notes are scattered all over the place with a hode podge of quotes from random sources I've been through over the years way back in like 2016-2019 before I started organizing things more. I've literally saved my download history going back over 8 years now and have dates on when I found certain data points. You can imagine this would take a LOT of drive space to have backup copies of all this data. There's also a massive stone monument in Britain called Avebury. There's ZERO CHANCE this was built by pagan savages. ZERO chance. It's massive, and absolutely dwarfs Stonehenge like crazy.

The people here before the moon appeared were called "pre-celanites" who were on the earth before 4039BC. When the moon arrived after the capture flood (4039BC) then they became the celanites who existed after the moon showed up. There was a time in history before there was a moon, according to my notes. 3499BC, people were still generally in a primitive state. There's minimal form of data that shows people were more advanced at this time, since this is pre-Sumerian culture. These people had 600 year periods in history.

The alchemist said a phrase. "Evolutionary impulse". Very interesting term. It's a natural raising of yang because it's available to be moved and to flow.

This idea of the "coming of a savior" that's scattered through so many traditions isn't just a Christian thing. The ancient Chinese have one too, despite being seemingly poly. Fuh-Hi (possibly also said as "Hoo-Yi in modern systems") was pretty much a prophet who said there'd be a coming of a savior. The biblical OT also has this thread over and over and over.

Organizing all this random data needs a structure. Best I go at it like this. Tradition. Time period. Focus of that time. Event/person/thing. Details. Cross references.

We need to keep in mind this self correction cycle arising out of this falling. This white population collapse will result in pushback, just as we see today. When I got triggered like mad was when I saw what happened at the rallies locally here against Albo the traitor. There's going to be a big self correction cycle. I needed to pull back and view things from cycles within cycles going back in history and understanding the trends trend but have cycles within each direction of ups and downs that keep people blind as to the overall trend. The seeming chaos masks the underlying order, or in this case, disorder. Cycles within cycles. It's all there. All of this data that's pointing to the removal of our people. the promotion of nationalistic stuff, how Christian (fake doctrine mind you) doctrine is becoming more widespread in zooms. There's way more zooms taking up religions again, because of the insane extreme "liberalism" that's taken place. It's just like before Nazi Germany. Weimar republic ruined the nation, then the Austrian painter came through to correct the extreme liberalism we have today. IT"S SCARILY SIMILAR. This is what I see happening, because this was the same scenario as what happened then, politically speaking. The 1980's might be the zenith between these periods. People will become infantilized by the pseudo religious propaganda. The self correction cycle, except a manipulated one, it's a manipulation of pressure to move people into certain ideologies. People will BEG for this solution BECAUSE IT SOLVES THEIR PROBLEMS, or so they think. The Juize CREATED the problem of extreme liberalism and this cultural suicide, people don't want that and so they begin to hate the current establishment. Then, the result, the solution, a swing to the other side. Look at the stats I mentioned on the last page. The stats in the UK, there will be VERY big shifts. Most people are already approaching the extreme, but the buildup is JUST BEGINNING. I was narrow sighted. The juize STILL WANT US GONE, but it's a SHIFT IN TREND to create a sort of chaos to bring order that's hidden and manipulative.

Let me tell you. They will "just do it". There will be no hesitation. They've always "just done it". What I mean is that the shift will be sudden, though it won't seem like that to you in the moment. It will be like "2 weeks to flatten the curve", even though there was no curve, because Virus don't cause disease. Never have and never will because it's impossible. Fools believe in fairy tales. It will involve WILLING participation, because it gives those people purpose. Think about all the whackos who played into the hands of the rainbow culture trash. It'll be like this, but on the other polarity. Why? Because the correction must be soon, considering the tensions are getting too high. Look at the shift in political ideology, which I was talking about ages ago. People are quite quickly now swinging to the other side because it's designed to polarize. Here's a consideration. Class conflict, ideological conflict. It will be culture wars, Christian vs Islam. Simple. I don't see how it will be racially based, because people won't want to go there, it will be ideological. Remember the plan is still to eradicate lights, as they say themselves, but it will be under a mask. Things will continue to heat up between religious ideology. The Kirk killing was the foreshadowing of what's going to show up. It'll be between Islam extremists (which we see already rising and getting away with it BY DESIGN) and the people in the west, who will be EMPOWERED by the state VALIDATING their view THROUGH RELIGION. People I know who were on the fence about Christian stuff ARE STUDYING WHAT KIRK SAID about his beliefs and are GETTING INTERESTED. This is JUST the beginning. I've not heard anyone else talk about this stuff. Cycles within cycles. I still can't shake the idea that Israel will still be under the eye for a while, that people will still want to blame them, but in my opinion, this will be turned into a situation where those who have been sus of Israel and are on the fence will doubt that belief. The Islamists will continue to blame Israel while they openly expand into the territory they've been planning on moving through. Trumpet playing at odds with BB being all up and down is once again to get people to buy into the chaos instead of the overarching plot. Peak dip. It's the same personally as it is collectively. Why wouldn't it be. If Israel will want to play the cards where "all nations turn against Israel" and claim that they're under attack from all the Islamic nations then this could be the precedent for a script shift, so UNTIL THAT MOMENT in the script, ALL NATIONS DID IN FACT TURN AGAINST ISRAEL, but it was only for the time it was necessary to move on with the next phase of polarization.

Could be wrong, but that's my analysis of putting it all together coherently. If you've read this far then obviously you're interested in more than just trying to get an SP. I don't think anyone with that as their goal, being so childish to focus on a person they need and ignore everything else around it, those people will be gone by now. Good riddance. Those people need a shock, a sudden spontaneous movement. That's what will get their SP to show up. I got a client success story show up in my DM yesterday with an SP thing. It happened this exact way. They "reacted" instantly in ways they'd not normally do and they got thrown out of their living arrangements from being reported to a certain department and then their SP started acting all nice and now they're on good terms. Early days still but the coincidences that occurred was wild. This guy is also getting serious with business too, as in he's ACTUALLY being involved in actions that are DIFFERENT CONSISTENTLY. Surrounding themes, remember. People in the LOA space deny this and yet all the data shows that the MORE you change AT ONCE surrounding the primary desire that overlaps in thematic relationship then the faster that will support the primary SP desire to show up. It's not beliefs in vacuums, though at times it can be, but for me it was that with my current girl I needed to break boxes surrounding it as well as think "maybe I won't get her" and "move on" or drop it. What does this mean. It means I'm not playing into self depreciating cycles of compromising on things that ACTUALLY MATTER TO MY NOURISHMENT SURROUNDING THE SP so that the themes that reflect her being with me can be stabilized. Those cycles can change, and it was through DIFFERENT ACTIONS OF BEING MORE INDEPENDENT that it happened. PROVE ME WRONG! It's ALWAYS the same formula. The thing is, people don't want to do that, and that's why they still suffer and can't get places with "manifesting" because ACTION GOES HAND IN HAND WITH ALL THE OTHER STUFF. It's all the same thing, really. The people who manifest the biggest stuff the fastest ACT SPONTANEOUSLY IN NECESSARY WAYS. They become a DIFFERENT PERSON IN AS MANY WAYS AS IS NECESSARY TO IMPLY THEY'RE WITH THE PERSON. You will know this if you do pathway work.

Side note. There will be "enemies of the state" that will be pointed out around the time the peak of this shift happens in a few years. I will say that it will be like Nazi Germany, where people will WANT to be a part of the shift in the cycle. Juize will LIKELY be exposed, and it will satisfy this seeming hatred that people have, though of course they will be false actors playing roles. None of the hard hitting names will be taken out, unless they fake it somehow. Israel is being set up for something, and people WILL WANT there to be shifts with that. I see things as ALLOWING themselves to be seen in a way that will satisfy this genetic hatred for Juize. Remember, Nazi Germany WAS A CHRISTIAN SOCIETY IN RESPONSE TO THE WEIMAR DAYS. People STILL don't understand that, and I believe this was DELIBERATELY hidden for this purpose. People don't realize that Christian doctrine in that time was the justification for the power exchange. Remember that. It will happen again.

Arabs are basically Jewish pirates. Mixed with Celts. The Myceneans aren't who we're talking about here.

Davidu goes back to Rashemric, Uguri. These are more ancient names. David goes back 4000 years.

The Vatican was responsible for eliminating the 552 year major reset cycle. There's suppose to be source material listed but I don't have the details for that. The AD/BC time scales we have now are designed to hide the true calendar and chronological system that reveals the nature of reality. 522AD is the only year that massive cataclysms came tp wipe out an enormous amount of people. There's definitely pre-determined systems of correction in this reality. This period is called is Justinian darkness period. These are the true dark ages, when there was another vapor canopy. This is when the giants likely last showed up, at least that can be verified. 1212AD had MASSIVE amounts of children suddenly vanishing out of thin air. This is the where the "children's crusade" came from. It was the church trying to explain these impossible events where people would just despawn out of thin air.

The phoenix palm tree of Egypt was the sacred tree of Thoth. Thoth is the scribe or messenger of the gods. Most call him the god of wisdom knowledge literature and magic and judgement but he's the one who manifests the "will" of God. He is the manifestation of necessity. Robert Graves who is someone I've quoted extensively earlier talked about this. Gerald Massey wrote an extensive book with enormous amounts of references in the late 1800's called "Ancient Egypt The Light Of The World". The word "nef" in Egyptian means spirit. Some scholars seem to connect Nef to the phrase in genesis "and darkness covered the face of the deep". Spirit. Saturn eating his children, according to the alchemist and most alchemical literature, says that Saturn (the mother matrix) ferments all the thematics through her/him, because Saturn is polar too. This ALSO has physical manifestation, with physical cataclysms that show up all of a sudden and destroy the world. This is the reset of the system of reality and all that's contained within it. 3895BC is year 1 of the AM calendar precedes the pre flood world which genesis picks up from. We've already established that the world had been reset when we went over this in dual seedline doctrine study. This time is 1656 years until the great flood of Noah. 3895BC was a massive reset year where there was a massive flaming sword in the sky that revolved and destroyed everything. This is how it was described in old texts. Now back to Nef. Who is Nef? What is this personified aspect? This IS the intelligence that manifests AS the reset phenomena. This facet of Saturn, of the substantive structure of yin as a polarity of God, this is what Nef is, and what the "holy spirit" is in the bible, I believe. There's 3 cultures connected. Fenrir is also associated to Nef too. Nef-Fen/rir/s. The bringer of ragnarok, who eats the moon. The moon gets blotted out. Fenris covers the moon, "eating" the moon. You see? This is a PHYSICAL phenomena and THIS HAS BEEN WHAT I'VE BEEN TRYING TO CONNECT FOR SO LONG. THERE MUST BE PHYSICAL MANIFESTATION OF THE ALCHEMY! NG is dead wrong about the bible, or at least half true.

Nef also relates to Phenc, Phoen, in Celtic druidic tongue. The phoenix relates to rebirth from ash. The destroyer, and revival. Christ, the savior. Solar, but also lunar.

The Heliopolitan priesthood in northern Egypt was at the base of the great pyramid. Here was the city of Annu, later known as On, literally "On". The Greeks called it Heliopolis, which I'm sure you've heard of. Heliopolis is the "metropolis of the sun". There was a temple near the Pyramid here called the "mansion of the phoenix", and strangely enough inside this place was a scaled down copy of the great pyramid called the "Ben Ben" stone. You can see images of this online. This Ben Ben stone was supposed to have been some secret part of the pyramid, it's said to be the capstone, and relate to a phoenix based on the symbolism carved into the stone. This is said to be the "stone the builders rejected".

Finding sources all all these notes is going to be a nightmare. There's a lot more notes.

So the cosmology of the heliopolitan system was actually based off a more ancient system drawn from a site called "edfu" which was further south and built by the Greek Macedonian kings of Egypt earlier. It says that in the "first time", which is the "Zep Tepi", before Egypt even existed, there were 10 rulers of the whole world. The 10 kings of the Zep Tepi, as named by Berosus, Alexander Polyhistor, and Eusebius, include Alorus, Aloporus, Alamemnon, Amemnon, Amegolorus, Dionysius, and the 10th king is Zithros. Believe it or not, the Sumerian dynasty of the 10 kings lines up here and then there's the "opposing" rulers who are said to be 7 annunaki kings and they all rules 5 cities called the Sumerian Pentopalis. Very creative name. Basically it's outlining there's a contrast of leadership before there was the first major flood. Thing is that there's a kicker here. There's actually 10 listed in the genealogy from Adam to Noah, who we know existed between the time of the annunaki showing up and the great flood of Noah when the vapor canopy collapsed and the reset happened again on earth where enormous amounts of people were killed off in the cataclysm. There's Adam, Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalal, Jared, Enoch, Methuselah, Lamech, and lastly Noah who was told that there'd be 120 days till the flood was to arrive. The opposing side has 7 too. That's the SAME SYSTEM BETWEEN SCRIPTURE, EGYPT AND SUMER. 10-7 rulers IN THE SAME TIME PERIOD! No accident. None of this is accidental. NG has ZERO interpretation for what these different sons actually mean nor does the alchemist as far as I know. This explains these impossible parts of scripture, because it's a physical chronology hidden in plain sight, but you have to connect it to other traditions, which has been my suspicion for a while now. The only way to make sense of these is to find overlaps between time periods and traditions. These aren't just alchemical traditions, they're time keeping systems that map out how reality is processing. The bible is a time keeping system that reveals processes within processes, a metaphysical alchemical chronological historical allegorical psychological text. Isn't that insane.

The Neteru are the Egyptian gods, with the word "NTR" meaning "one who watches." They are associated with the Anunnaki, also known as the Watchers, who descended among men before the flood. The Neteru were considered divine beings or gods in ancient Egyptian belief. So the heliopolitan system says that in "the first time" (Zep-Tepi) BEFORE the Neteru were around (the 10 rulers of Egypt AKA SUMER FRM THE SAME STORY), the world was visited by the "PN" god. Phenc., Phoen, Nef. Phoenix. This diety is considered a a fiery sky dragon figure (called the "great leaping one") associated with destruction and cataclysm of reality prior to the first creation of the world. The devastation of reality as a whole was so overwhelming that everything that lived instantly died. EVERYTHING died. That's what this world is, it's not a playground for your imagination like NG promotes. Genesis 1:1, then moves into Genesis 1:2. This is what I've proposed for a long time now, that there were people here before the bible story begins. This is also the Egyptian system, according to the heliopolitan cosmology. This account of the "PN" god was BEFORE Gen 1:2. This was when there were other people on the earth, Cro-Magnon. Basically this story is talking about how the entire world that existed prior to Genesis 1:2 all got instantly eradicated in an instant when this deity arrived. Crazy stuff. Remember, Adam and Eve weren't the FIRST HUMANS ON EARTH. I've said that for a long time now, that Adam and Eve were a NEW CYCLE OF HUMANS ON EARTH. This means that this entire world is likely a repeating program on loop where people spawn in and then get instantly eradicated and then a new world is born again. Cycles of creation and destruction, and the juize have done a fantastic job at creating circus to hide this fact from us throughout history. Also keep in mind, that I've considered Adam and Eve to likely be GROUPS of people, since Cain and his wife and son are said to have "builded a city" according to Gen 4:17. You don't build a city with 3 people. This MUST mean there were MORE people like them around for this. These characters are placeholders for groups of people, most likely. Single people DON'T MAKE SENSE FULLY. There's still holes, which I've pointed out in my prior bible study, as well as many other bits, but I discounted them since I didn't have a chronological system to line up with relating to surrounding traditions and systems such as those in Sumer and Egypt.

In the Babylonian and Amorite coniform we have the term "Adamu". Adamu are really a distinction of a SPECIFIC type of people. Adamu/Adam are the same people, the same group of people, who lost their world. People "from the red earth". I went through a bunch of Etymology of these terms many years ago so this is all in my head. Keep in mind that this PN story was taught by these priests in the mansion of the phoenix, about a phoenix visiting this world and eradicating all life on earth BEFORE they were created. PN, "Phoen", Phenc. I mean how many overlaps are there. In Greek, Phoen IS PN from Egyptian. Same word, different spelling. The PN reset event started the AM time code. Anno Mundi. This is the time code they worked on. It ran for 6000 years. 3895BC is 1AM. Thing is that that's not 6000 years from now, it's less than that. The REAL complete reset is 2178, where there will be another "PN" type god show up and eradicate all life on earth 100% and wipe the whole reality clean for a new world to be created just like this one. So putting this all together, the cosmology of these systems is all about cycles within cycles, just like RS has talked about since day 1. This is the CORE principle of RS in fact. They believed that time and all things are cyclical. Process within process. Fractality. Robert Graves talks about this, as I mentioned multiple times before where he references the Egyptian "Bennu bird" or PHOENIX. This is the "sacred bird" of heliopolis. Why? Why do they venerate this bird. There's some that seem to connect it to Osiris (which is also connected to Juize by the way which I went over before) and I believe there's likely a reason why the heads of many Egyptian gods are bird like. The Egyptian image in the Greek tradition is a purple feathered bird. This wasn't an actual bird remember, it was a celestial deity like a "dragon" which ONLY showed up in the sky at regular intervals. This is just like the native American tradition and their "thunder bird" it seems. Why do these people always have totems with wings at the top? Same reason. Same entity. It's always birds.

So we've got the 10 kings in Revelation AKA the 10 horns and then you've got the 7 angels and vials and seals. Always 10 and 7, though there's also 12. 7 is a JEWISH number by the way. Everything they do is in 7, and 6.

Amenhotep IV became Amenhaten and then Akhenaten. Renamed a lot. An Egyptian papyrus written in Greek but dated as a copy of an older text from the time of Amenhotep specifically reads, "For in the Typhon time the sun is veiled." This indicates that the quote is attributed to a text from Amenhotep's era, though the surviving papyrus is a later Greek copy of that older Egyptian text. Typhon is another name for the phoenix. The important thing to understand here is that these gods aren't JUST personified elements of consciousness and reality, but that they reflect physical manifestations too. That's WHAT THE STUDY OF METAPHYSICS IS, but few want to go that far with it because they don't have the capacity to break out of the conventional view of how things work in history and how there's tons of evidence of giants and structures that were built which would've been impossible for the time.

Another point. So we need to understand that the heliopolitan system that the priests worked with in the days of post Zep-Tepi time period was different from what was before that too. They have a pantheon called the "Ogdoad", which the name suggests clearly had 8 deities. There was also the Agniad. The Agniad in Egypt refers to a very ancient and well-established group of nine gods connected to ancient Egyptian and Greek traditions, linked to the priesthood cult of northern Egypt near the Great Pyramid. This concept is associated with the Heliopolitan cult and has ties to Sumerian and Phoenician influences, reflecting a deep, archaic religious and cultural heritage in Egypt. These older pantheons were before Zep-Tepi. Now this is THE key point to understand with where all this is going. This will make you think "whoa". Ok so this heliopolitan priesthood brought in a new god POST Zep-Tepi called, Horus. That's right. Horus the solar god was NEW. How did they not have a SOLAR POWER IN THEIR PANTHEON? Advanced gazing works with the solar level as a balancing of the lunar, because it's the balance of solar and lunar that generates proportionality and alignment. Horus was the son of Osiris who battled with Set. This is sourced from the Chester Beatty Papyrus which includes various traditions between biblical and Egyptian and even has verses from the book of Enoch. So the kicker is this. Do you know why Horus the solar deity is new? Because the sun became manifest from being hidden. After the sky fell and the vapor canopy collapsed the sun was "born". IS THAT A COINCIDENCE OR WHAT? HOW CAN THAT BE JUST A COINCIDENCE! When the Zep-Tepi was over and this new god Horus showed up it was because the great flood of Noah had ended and they now saw a new deity in the sky. The sun. IF THIS IS ALCHEMICAL THEN WHY DID THEY INTRODUCE ANOTHER SO CALLED SOLAR DIETY WHEN THE SKY FELL? Yeah they had Ra as a solar god but I KNOW we don't work with Ra in solar level gazing because that's not who the alchemist said this works with. It wasn't Ra it was Horus. Yang. Horus is the "new" sun god. Once again, if the gods are FUNDAMENTAL TO ALCHEMY AND IT'S ALL ALLEGORY then WHY DOES HORUS SHOW UP AFTER THE SKY FELL! The great flood that happened in 2239BC ended the old Zep-Tepi time which lasted 1656 years of the antediluvian world which represented the NEW WORLD of the bible in Genesis that started in the year 3895BC with the PN god showing up and destroying the old world. Gen 1:2 "And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.". This is why. Because these gods are ALSO based on physical events that happened and REPRESENT PHYSICAL PHENOMENA THAT MANIFEST IN OUR REALITY COLLECTIVELY. It's ALSO a collective metaphysical system, not just a personal psychological allegorical level. This is pretty clear now to me that my idea about this that I couldn't ever PROVE is far more accurate than I ever thought. This is catching onto something BIG. Right after I went through a hard dip, that's when I found all my old data I dug up back in early 2022 before I got into studying LOA full time.

Notes say "The books that reference the 1656 years of the vapor canopy include Genesis, Antiquities of the Jews by Flavius Josephus, works by Usher, Rashi, Talmudic texts, writings of early church fathers, and books by biblical chronologists such as Stephen Jones and Robert A. Bullae.". I need to dig deeper into those for quotes.

In Genesis the Sethites were those who made up the 10 kings, and the 7 kings of the opposition were the Cainites. Remember, Cain and his son and his wife BUILT A CITY. Guess what. In Sumerian tradition, the Cainites were the builders, who built cities and worked metal in the city of Bad-Tibira, they built the shipping yards of Larak. Sippar the city of knowledge which was like the great library, which later became a Babylonian city and the Giza complex in Egypt which was the largest library in the world, Shuruppak, and the capital Eridu. Enki and his consort Damkina were the rulers here in this city.

What's even more crazy actually is that since we established before that Set and Typhon (which is the phoenix AKA the reset cycle) and according to mythology it's said that Horus FOUGHT Set in a battle and won, and Set is the God of STORMS, CHAOS, DARKNESS. No joke. The vapor canopy. Floods. Set was defeated by Horus. The cycle processed and there was a new "god". ONCE AGAIN IF THIS IS ALCHEMICAL THEN HOW COME HORUS SHOWED UP AS A NEW GOD IN WHAT SHOULD'VE BEEN AN ESTABLISHED SYSTEM OF THEMATIC COMPONENTS OF CONSCIOUSNESS! If NG is claiming that these traditions (biblical which obviously mirrors other traditions) are ALL allegory then we must have a reasonable explanation for THIS and the reason why the world SUCKS so much under the control of Juize. HOW do you explain this connection in any way other than that the new sun god Horus who defeated the god of storms and darkness and chaos if it's not physical history AND allegory, since it's metaphysical. Set and typhon are the same thing, the reset cycle. Horus defeated the reset cycle or balance of power. By the way, Horus is where we get our time system of "hours". Horus. Suns and birds. Funny that.

The tempest stele which was built by Ahmose I supposedly in 1550BC says:

"Long live (?) the Horus “Great of Manifestations,” He of the] Two Ladies “Pleasing of Birth,” the golden Horus “Who binds the Two Lands,” King of Upper and Lower Egypt, Neb-pehty-Ra, son of Ra, Ahmose, living forever.

Now, His Majesty dwelt in the town of Sedjefatawy (“Provisioner of the Two Lands”) [in the district just to] the south of Dendera.

Now then, A[mon-Ra, Lord of the Thrones of the Two Lands,] was in Heliopolis of Upper Egypt (= Thebes).

It was His Majesty who went south (“upstream”) in order to [give to him bread, beer and everything good and] pure. Now after the offering, [. . .] their(?) [. . .]. Then attention was given in33 [. . .] this [dis]trict. Now then, the cult image [of this god . . .] [. . .] as his body was installed in (lit. “united with”) this temple
while his limbs were in joy.

[. . . Now then,] this great god desired [. . .] His Majesty [. . .] while the gods complained of their discontent. [Then] the gods [caused] that the sky come in a tempest of r[ain], with [dark]ness in the condition of the West, and the sky being in storm without [cessation, louder than] the cries [lit., “voices”] of the masses, more powerful [than . . .], [while the rain howled] on the mountains louder than the sound of the underground source of the Nile that is in Elephantine.

Then every house, every quarter that they (scil. the storm and rain) reached [. . . their corpses(?)] floating on the water like skiffs of papyrus outside the palace audience chamber for a period of [. . .] days [. . .] while no torch could be lit in the Two Lands.

Then His Majesty said: ‘How much greater this is than the wrath of the great god, [than] the plans of the gods!’ His Majesty then descended to his boat, with his council following him, while the crowds [on] the East and West had hidden faces, having no clothing on them after the manifestation of the wrath of the god. His Majesty then reached the interior of Thebes, with gold confronting gold of this cult image, so that he received what he desired.

Then His Majesty began to reestablish the Two Lands, to give guidance (or “a conduit”) for the flooded territories. He did not f [ail] in providing them with silver, with gold, with copper, with oil and cloth comprising every bolt that could be desired. His Majesty then made himself comfortable (= seated himself) within the palace (life! prosperity! health!).

Then His Majesty was informed that the mortuary concessions had been entered: the tomb chambers collapsed, the funerary mansions undermined, and the pyramids fallen – what had been made rendered non-existent (lit., “what had not been made”).

Then His Majesty commanded to restore the temples that had fallen into ruin in this entire land: to refurbish the monuments of the gods, to erect their enclosure walls, to provide the sacred objects in the noble chamber, to mask the secret places, to introduce into their shrines the cult images which were cast to the ground, to set up the braziers, to erect the altars, to establish their bread offerings, to double the income of the personnel, to put the land into its former state. Then it was done in accordance with all that His Majesty had commanded."

Modern scholars think this is the "first weather report". What a joke. You can see in this the battle between Horus the sun and the darkness of Set. Now get this. Amenhotep III was also called Amennophis. Nophis in Egypt was, the winged disk. You know what that is? The Typhon. It's not the sun. Whenever you see a WINGED sun it's relating to the reset cycle, the Typon, Nophis, phoenix. The "hidden" phoenix. 2Sa 22:11 "And he rode upon a cherub, and did fly: and he was seen upon the wings of the wind.". W.J Perry wrote in his book "children of the sun" all about how virtually EVERY tradition ALL OVER THE WORLD suddenly introduced solar deities into their systems. WHY? WHY THE HECK IS THIS A THING IF IT'S ALL ALLEGORY? HUH?? A complete metaphysical system of psychological allegory SHOULDN'T CORRESPOND TO PHYSICAL EVENTS LIKE THIS IF IT'S INDEPENDENT! Right? Am I just crazy here? Gerald Massie and Robert Graves wrote about this shift in solar deities showing up all over the world around the same time period all of a sudden. Before these time periods it was ALL Lunar and Stellar calendars. Stellar and solar ARE NOT THE SAME THING. I've had discussions with the alchemist about this. Why did they all follow lunar and stellar systems until the vapor canopy collapsed? Connect the dots. You want to know where the vapor canopy is? It's IN THE ICE PAC AT THE POLES. DO YOU KNOW WHY THE OLD MAPS HAVE LAND MASSES THERE THAT CORRESPOND TO THE RADAR THAT'S SHOWN TO BE ACCURATE TO THEIR MAPPINGS UNDER THE ICE? IT'S BECAUSE THE ICE CAPS ARE ALL THE WATER THAT'S FALLEN AND FROZEN OVER WHICH WILL SOON BECOME A NEW CANOPY IN LESS THAN 15 YEARS FROM NOW. That's if the predictions and charts are correct, which seems to be the case based on trends and past cycles. Those ice caps contain mammals that were once on land that've been FLASH FROZEN. The petrification of fish INSTANTLY solidified. People TO THIS DAY in for example Siberia melt that snow and eat the mammals that were once on land now frozen inside. Go look up some video for yourself and see. They eat sloths, bison, pigs, rhinos. It's all there. Flash frozen mammals. They'd have probably gotten eaten by the sea farers around there if they fell in and somehow froze over. That's just crazy.

Apparently I need to get up on camera and tell people the bible is all allegory or I'm a bad person for not following what NG said. Screw you. You're wrong. I've done the HARD WORK EVERY DAY FOR YEARS TO FIGURE THIS OUT AND I HAVE THE RECEIPTS TO PROVE THIS RIGHT HERE!

20/9/25

The Nef of Ancient Egypt is the spirit of God in the bible who created the heavens and the earth and moved over the waters of the dark world without form. The "intermediate "periods that the so called historians claim are just proof of these resets. This should be obvious now. There's 3 of them. 2613BC-2181BC, 2181BC-2040BC, 2040BC-1782BC.

4639BC. 5239BC. 600 year cycle. Guess what. 4039BC was when the moon appeared. I need to dig into source material to show this stuff nobody would believe this. I've got most of the source I need to dig for the exact quotes I got notes on. We know that Enki and stuff showed up in 3439BC. This whole thing is in the blood.

I found some more notes.

"The races that were here before Ekni came included the Mongolid and Nigroid races, who were firmly established before Caucasians appeared. The Sumerians called themselves the "blackheaded people," distinct from the tall, bearded, Aryan Caucasian Annuna newcomers. The Adamu and Kainu were also races or cultures described before the flood, with the Annuna being tall, bearded Caucasians who intermarried with local Sumerians to produce modern so called Homo sapiens. Thus, the Mongolid, Nigroid, "blackheaded" Sumerians, Adamu, Kainu, and Annuna peoples were present before Ekni."

"The Annuna came from the Americas, having departed from a mass destruction there before 3439 BC, and reappeared in Old World legends and traditions. They brought advanced technology, including flying aircraft and written flight manuals (vimana for example), which were unfamiliar to the new matriarchal peoples they encountered. Their origins are linked to a civilization destroyed pre-3439 BC in the Americas, and they were later remembered as the Anunnaki in Babylonian tradition."

So 3895BC is when these Annuna got caught by a reset cycle. The moon showed up (just like how Horus showed up in the mythos of the Egyptians when the sun showed up AGAIN) in 4039BC but only 144 years later the lights that were there wiped out from another reset and probably got buried under mud, since it was a lunar cycle. This also might explain the matriarchal society they were, moon civilization.

Imagine that the so called Annuna-ki (annuna) were just like the typical Aryan you'd think of, except even lighter and more glowing and stuff. That's pretty much who these people were. They weren't giants, they were just like us, but taller and more advanced, not aliens, and they dwelled in the Americas, often INSIDE the earth. There was a civilization around between 5239BC and 4309BC. Notice the multiples of 60. 60 seems to be the primary time scale of reality. The 600 year cycle from 5239BC to 4639BC was the period that apparently had an advanced annuna civilization who were advanced alchemists and such and were actually getting deep into a state of collective immortality to transcend this reality. Remember, where did our modern alchemical understanding come from? Somewhere other than here. I've got notes that say this period had 2 suns. A greater and lesser sun, like a sun and moon but not the same. It seems that the general "day night" cycle isn't what we think it is, if this is correct. There's been periods without normal day night cycles like here, and if you go to the poles you won't have a normal day night cycle either. So in the 930th year of these people thriving on the surface, 330 years after 4639BC you had their big reset. as though there was a massive correction on collective illumination where their alchemically enlightened civilization was destroyed so badly they'd never recover. Almost all life was destroyed in this time but not everything completely. This was like a built in self correction cycle to prevent expansion from happening too fast. The alchemist has apparently said this is a function of the higher genius which will keep you down if it needs you to be kept back, but in this case their entire world got absolutely destroyed. This isn't the same event as the PN god showing up and wiping reality clean for a new creation of people, which is how then we get the "annunaki" story of creation once again after which is basically these people arising once again to rebuild in this new reality cycle. Genesis other than 1:1 is the telling of the creation of a new reality, written from the perspective of the PN god of ancient Egypt, who is woven into the fabric of reality. This seems to be an overseeing collective higher genius.

IGIGI are Juize.

Enki is Enoch. Enki became the trickster and also the savior.

Occult means to hide. To veil. To keep from being seen. What is being kept from being seen? The nature of reality. Metaphysics. The history, which is another level of the metaphysics also counts.

Anki didn't land in Sumer. The Annuna landing was elsewhere but recorded in Sumer.

This is a quote I've found

"The Akkadian calendar was anciently 360 days. Alexander Heidel cites Neugebauer in writing that in early Babylonian times the calendar was 12 months of 30 days each for a 360-day year.

Sir Isaac Newton assures us that the 360-day year was the only one known to the ancient Israelites, that they brought it out of Egypt, that it was the official ancient Egyptian calendar, that at the Temple of Osiris the priests ceremonious filled 360 bowls of milk a year.

Pliny the Elder in Natural History 2000 years ago admits that the ancient Athenians knew the year to be 360 days.

Alexander Heidel citing Neugebauer wrote that early Babylonian calendar was 12 months of 30 days for a 360 day year.

John Jackson in Chronological Antiquities, 1752, wrote that the 360 day year was maintained by the ancient Egyptians, Chaldeans, Phoenicians, Persians, Greeks and Romans as evidenced in writings of Diodorus Siculus and Berossus.

In Long Livers, 1722, Eugenius Philolethes wrote that the ancient Egyptians and Persians divided the year into 360 days.

Max Duncker in The History of Antiquity, 1877, wrote that the Egyptians maintained a 360 day solar year of twelve months of 30 days each.

Alexander del Mar in The Worship of Augustus Caesar, 1900, wrote that the 3600 year period mentioned in ancient writers was a convoluted 360 year cycle as found in the Surya Siddhanta.

In The Phoenix, An Essay by John Goodridge, 1781, wrote that the antediluvian year was 360 days

Robert Watson in An Universal History from the Earliest Account of Time to the Present, 1740, wrote that the ancient Chaldean year was 360 days.

Immanuel Velikovsky in Worlds in Collision shows that;

Vedic texts of India record an older 360-day year

Hindu texts formerly recorded a 360-day year

Ctesias wrote that Babylon’s 360-furlong long walls was same as 360 days of the year

Assyrian decade was 3600 days, or ten periods of 360 days for a years

Egyptian Ebers Papyrus maintained a year of 360 days

Plutarch wrote that reign of Romulus the year was 360 days

Chinese calendar anciently 360 days until changed to 365¼

Genesis 7:24 reads that the floodwaterds endured 150 days. Elsewhere in Genesis the Flood lasted five months. For 150 days to be five months then all five months were 30 days each, meaning the Genesis year was 360 days.

The Mayan Long Count Calendar only works on a 360 day year. The baktuns of 144,000 days and the full system of 1,872,000 days is divisible by 360 [360 x 5200]

All yugas [see Sex, Symbols and the Stars] were divisible by 360, showing these ancient time-keeping systems have a common origin."

360 days. The universal time code. There's a book called "The chronology of ancient kingdoms by none other than Newton. There's also a book called "The Babylonian Genesis" by Alexander Heidel.

2052 is the arrival of the annuna, the same 7 kings that will implement the "beast system" and control everything we do. These are said to be the SAME kings from the las vapor canopy period who will physically come (as humans they're not aliens) and implement this. The biggest thing I noted here is that they arise during a period of extreme darkness when the whole world will be basically destroyed and there will be massive famine and death everywhere you look as tribulation unfolds. They are showing up because the thematic environment of the world will become more yin, the sun will vanish and so they will manifest in response. The swing of the cycle went from solar to lunar. No way around that. Personal reality experience for someone who's solidly empowered could stand in the middle of this world destroying cataclysm and survive without a scratch. If you're not there though, you'll get who you really are being. Are you living as someone who's stuck, in fear, small and weak, or are you empowered as yourself and can stand before the highest nature and look it in the eye and be unmoved?

What I get out of this more than anything is to live how YOU want to and be reborn THIS INSTANT. Shouldn't need a countdown to the opening of the vials of judgement of revelation to do that though. It's already within you. Live in a functional way and you'll manifest abundance while everything else falls apart. That's just always been the case. Living functionally is the point.

There's a book. "The light of Egypt Science of the Light and Stars". This talks about many important points.

21/9/25

Took a break for a while today. There's so much data. I can't even describe. Also this page is slightly slowing down so I must be near then end of it, though I've got hundreds of tabs open in brave using over 20gb of ram so. Even a max OC 285k can't keep up. Maybe the bus speed is the bottleneck, I don't know. Seems that no PC on earth can run shopify page editor smoothly.

So I need to make more connections between time systems. I also believe I have a few errors in groups of people that I've linked, there's so many different systems that use different names for the same people and finding reliable sources that link these names is a challenge The 7 kings of revelation. Interestingly as far as I know NG never commented on this, He did say this though.

"The words of prophecy spoken of in the book of Revelation are your basic desires which must not be further conditioned. Man is constantly adding to and taking from these words. Not knowing that the basic desire contains the plan and power of expression man is always compromising and complicating his desire." - freedom for all chapter 7.

"By basic desire is meant your real objective. Secondary desires deal with the manner of realization. God, your I AM, speaks to you, the conditioned conscious state, through your basic desires. Secondary desires or ways of expression are the secrets of your I AM, the all wise Father. Your Father, I AM, reveals the first and last – “I am the beginning and the end” [Revelation 1:8, 22:13] – but never does He reveal the middle or secret of His ways; that is, the first is revealed as the word, your basic desire. The last is its fulfillment – the word made flesh. The second or middle (the plan of unfoldment) is never revealed to man but remains forever the Father’s secret."

So base desire is the "thing" and the secondary desire is the thematic undertone to be integrated. Right?

Oh no. nevillegoddardbooks.com is down. I hope they've not been nuked. I was gathering a database from there. There's almost every lecture on that website. Damn this is why I offline download information because it can be removed with the blink of an eye just like this. Studying what NG says about this stuff almost ALWAYS comes to be the same thing. It's going back to fulfilling desires and cutting through trash, practically speaking at least. This involves action. Saying otherwise is just dumb, because someone

Site note. I've had TONS of juice lately. Like I'm laughing at so much stuff and just filled with youthful joy, for lack of a better term. Haven't taken the heart blood tonics in ages now so that's interesting. It's ever since I went through that last dip. The baseline has shifted up SO MUCH.

In 1998 a whole convention of anthropologists and geologists and archeologists and a bunch of other scientists got together relating to the bronze age timeline and they all concluded that at around 2240BC is the time that the new bronze age began. Guess what. That's 1 year BEFORE THE GREAT FLOOD. This thread of MASSIVE innovation showing up RIGHT AFTER a cataclysmic destruction is irrefutable there's WAY TOO MANY OVERLAPS FOR THIS TO BE COINCIDENCE. This is planned into the nature of reality. It's all pre-determined. Frank Joseph, Bruce Massie (who I've referenced before) wrote about this and published data on this pretty conclusively lining these things up. It matters that you bring ALL the data together and compare and contrast notes and reach a reasonable conclusion. This is once again another representation of this.

22/9/25

The 7 kings began their original control system on earth back in 2909BC which lasted 670 years. There's that number. They left just before the flood in 2239BC. They must've known it was coming. This is why it's written in the Sumerian tradition that the 7 kings ruled 670 years. These are the "dragon kings" of those days. Genesis is mostly just a form of the tablets of the Babylonian Enuma Elish, which I quoted parts of before. This is why bible critics all claim that these traditions copy paste each other. I remember going over a bunch of flood accounts from other traditions which almost like up 1-1 perfectly including ark measurements and everything.

I remember seeing a vid from someone who was developing D-Wave so called quantum computers saying something about "We're summoning the Lovecraftian old ones" or something like that relating to the imprisoned beings spoken about in the book of the dead. It's said that the ancients said the stars were friendly but the planets themselves were literally "chained demons". Given that the archetypes themselves we interact with through advanced gazing represent personified intelligences that can sometimes be seen this way it wouldn't surprise me. The alchemist passes this off as just subjective experiences, but considering I know he has blind spots in understanding of systems outside of his realm of understanding, it wouldn't be something I'd just pass off as fairy tale given everything else that lines up here we've gone over. Now I remember reading about an event in 2052 that's going to be the time of the return of these "old ones" who ushers in the 7 kings kingdom under the "beast system" of revelation. The return of the 7 dragon kings. These are humans, not aliens. The planets are themselves admitted to cause us suffering, through influence by way of aetheric friction as I've talked about before. This is why we burn Jing, I believe. Friction where our substrate runs up against and causes friction against the layers of our fractal field geometry representing those planets. It's built into the interface it seems, which is the "soul cage" that the alchemist calls, though he says it's necessary for transformation. I agree, though that doesn't take away from the reality of what that really is, that this is a binding force to literally forces of actual dysfunction in this reality. I believe the Juize are subordinate to these intelligences, who physically do exist, as well as holding a metaphysical substrate on a macro level too. The way we bypass their influence is by being our own supply, to integrate those thematic elements and thus we master reality not by fighting against them per say because that's not our function but to exist within the same collective overlap and yet operate as ourselves where God will ensure that as we transform into our highest capacity we are granted our wishes accordingly. It's more or less that you're able to exist without being driven by the processes that they want you to, and that you operate in your own process.

This is much of the new level of RS manifesting theory I've refined further over the last week.

Got more notes on a place called Magan.

"The forgotten country called Magan was a civilization that existed before Egypt came into existence, located in northern Egypt and North Africa. It is referenced in old cuneiform tablets and the Necronomicon's Magan text, which describes Magan as a lost civilization destroyed before the rise of Egypt. The texts portray Magan as connected to ancient, possibly supernatural forces, with humans playing a key role in opening a gate called Yaxacak to release the "ancient ones" seeking vengeance. Magan is considered the real ancient precursor to Egypt, distinct from the Egypt known today."

Here's a quote from the Magan text of the book of the dead.

"Man is the key by which the gate of Yaxacak may be flung wide by which the ancient ones seek their vengeance upon the face of the earth, upon the offspring of marduke (man). For that which is new came from that which is old, and that which is old shall replace the new and once again the ancient ones shall rule upon the face of the earth."

There's overlap here with the so called ancient ones and the "old serpent" and these "Lovecraftian old ones" given multiple data points I've gathered over the years which for some reason all showed up in my mind at once. So this place called "Magan" is really the OLD ancient Egypt, possibly from before the PN god showed up and instantly destroyed everything that lived on the world which picks up then after Gen 1:2. That quote seems to represent reference revelation prophesy and this leading into the destruction of the old world, as an old cycle ends where a new one begins. Process. It says that MAN IS THE KEY BY WHICH THE GATE OF YAXACAK MAY BE FLUNG WIDE. Man is the key. Us performing their rituals, it's by us buying into their conditioning and the processes that WE ARE USED TO MANIFEST THEIR WILL HERE ON EARTH. This is a conditioned collective prophesy manifest through the Juize control over everything in this world. This is why I have recognized that living correctly really relates to actually building your own world totally devoid of feeding into the system that's established and tries to suck you into "believing in it" at every opportunity.

This gate mentioned in the book of the dead also relates to the same as the Gate of Rostau (or Rostale/Vrostal) in ancient Egypt. It is described as the "door of the corridors of the mountain," which likely refers to the Great Pyramid of Giza. This gate is guarded by Kalipatoroth, the Sphinx (named Kalipatoroth, not the same sphynx we see built near the pyramid), and is linked to Gnostic records. Humans are considered the key to this gate, meaning human destiny is deeply connected to the function of the Great Pyramid with how it's mapped out the collective timeline. The great Pyramid and places like Stonehenge function similarly as countdown monuments to events that are within the unfolding of these various processes manifest in our reality. The gate is associated with ancient technology that, when activated by humans, could open the "Dark Satellite" coined by Christian mystic Thomas Burgoyne (follower of gnostic texts of course) in the 1880's, which is there to free the ancient ones, specifically the Anunnaki who ruled before the flood.

This is what Burgoyne quotes, just to provide source in the book I mentioned earlier "the light of Egypt" in chapter 3 for this thing:

"It is needless to add that these vampires are lost to all that is redemptive and good; they have gravitated to the lowest realms of brute animality in nature upon the descending arc, and ultimately they become indrawn within the death whirl of that magnetic orb known as the dark satellite, and are swept to their final doom, extinction"

"The magical hierophants of the Inversive Magi, are beings we consider not worthy of the name of Adept, because they are the legionaries of the Dark Satellite, and as such are only adepts so far as the mysteries of practical magic are concerned. They cannot penetrate beyond the astral zones of the cosmic and magnetic elementals, hence they know absolutely nothing of the higher states of the soul world, or of the mysteries of angelic life. They deny their very existence, and substitute a delusive Devachan, and dreamy Nirvana of nothingness in their place."

"This eighth orb is known to Initiates of the highest interior degree as "the Dark Satellite," whose ruling spiritual hierophant is known by the name of Ob. From this name came that of Oberon and so evil and infernal is the power of this sphere that all cases of demonia, enchantment or possession came to be termed Obsession. The buried cities of the Gobi desert belong to races who were the devotees of this Ob. (This was after the Gobi had become a portion of the continent of old India and does not refer to the "Golden isle" of the sea, when the Gobi was a tropical ocean.) Hence its name, Gobi, that is, the followers of Ob, or the country of Ob. This is the reason for the awful traditions mentioned in "Isis Unveiled" as to the hidden treasures being guarded by a legion of infernal spirits. It is from this evil orb that the powers possessed by the Black Magi are derived, and, in fact, it is the Spiritual correspondence of those brothers on Earth. For, remember, there is not a class of people, or a society devoted to any subject on Earth, but what has a spiritual correspondence in the realm of spirit. The Hermetic Law is one grand truth, viz., "As it is above, so it is below, as on the Earth, so in the Sky." St. Paul mentions, or rather refers, to this "Dark Satellite" when he publicly declares: "We wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against powers and principalities, princes of the air," etc. "

"During the lapse of the ages, countless legends and allegories have been evolved, to embody the facts and the processes connected with this arcane mystery, but the metaphysics of these legends have never been revealed to the uninitiated. Especially has this been the case in regard to the Dark Satellite. However, the time has now come when certain facts in regard to this orb of evil are for the first time given out to the world "pro bono publico.""

"They are the active Occult agents of that potent fraternity within the spiritual world which has its external expression and correspondence in the brotherhood known upon Earth as the "Black Magi," or "Inversive Brethren." These two fraternities, viz: the spiritual rulers and potentialities of the dark satellite upon the astral plane, and the schools of Black magic, vice and crime, upon the physical plane; constitute the two halves of the planet's evil desire."

"We have pointed out the fact that it is the dark satellite from whence proceeds the spirit of lies, murder and frauds. This was well known to the initiates of the greater Hermetic mysteries, for we find the idea very clearly defined in the mystical language of the ancients, as the following extract from one of the supposed lost magical works of Hermes Trismegistus will show. Speaking of the magical rulers of the dark satellite as they sit in council, creating delusion, we read:
"So they called forth a form
From the deep dark abyss
To embody their evil desire."
"Obedient it came
From the realms of the dead,
Arrayed in its magic attire."
"As it passed o'er the earth
The fair flowers fell dead,
From its breath of poisonous £re."
Indeed, so thoroughly has this poisonous fire of self-interest permeated the world, that the fair flowers of disinterestedness have become an almost entirely extinct species, and should the real state of unselfish, unworldliness of a true mystic become known, he is either regarded with pity as non compos mentis, or else looked upon with suspicion as an imposter, acting from motives more subtle than govern the ordinary mortal. The manner in which this poisonous magnetic energy is projected from the dark satellite to the earth is wholly inversive, and the rulers and magical hierophants make use of this inversive force to distort and corrupt Truth in every form wherein it struggles to become manifest upon earth. The powers and influences attributed to certain races of astrals, by the authors of "The Perfect Way," belong in reality to the rulers and principalities of the dark satellite, who mercilessly distort every arcane truth into theological dogma, of partial error, causing it to assume to the human mind the delusive form of the externals of truth and logic. But the delusive form is, after all, only a very flimsy sophistry when subjected to the keen searching eye of the soul. Consequently, it is always those who are half informed of Nature's mysteries; the half-initiated, so to say; who fall into the snare. Herein is seen the Occult truth in the proverb, "A little learning is a dangerous thing."".

That right there is a very interesting passage. Talks about trapping people in false paradigms that are half true because that's what people know and since they're unaware of all the surrounding deception they'll buy into the fiction without realizing there's actually fiction in that model. Remember, I only know these things because I've been moved to go through many terabytes of data.

"At this point the question na~mall y arises, "of what personal or selfish benefit is the propagatiOn of error to the inhabitants of the dark satellite?" The answer is simply this, it furnishes them with the means of prolonging their external existence while on earth, and supplies them with an addition"! lease or life in the world to come; as will be made manifest from the Hermetic laws or death given below. Aceording to llennetic laws, death is not what is known as physical, dissolution, but is a failure on the part of the human being to polarize the atoms which constitute his soul so he may realize immortality. It is, therefore, a falling from the h\lman plane to the animal plane, where conscious existence many be prolonged inde6nitely by means of dark magica 1 arts. The following arc an accurate rendering of the real ideas as taught hy Hermes Trismegistus.
LAWS OF DEATH
I. "As it is below, so it is ahovei as on the earth, so in the sky."
II. "There are two states of being; one is mortal, the other is immortal."
III. "That which is mortal is dissolvable, and dissolvable bodi<"s pas-s away like a mist in the morning."
IV. "An immortal body is an essence which is eternal and incorruptible."
V. "But the twain, the mortal and the immortal, cannot exist together forever, but each returneth to the place from whence it came. "
VI. "The mortal body is sensible, but the immortal is reasonable."
VII. "The former contains nothing that is perfect, the latter nothing that is imperfect; for the one is the essence of the matter, and the other the essence of spirit, and man, the microcosm, holds the balance of the twain."
VIII. "And there is a fierce warfare for the victory, between the lower and the upper, as they both desire to obtain the body as their prize; for the state of man is envied by the lower and glorified as a noble state by the higher."
IX. "Now if the man inclines toward the lower nature which is mortal, he thereby aids the lower imperfect powers to oppose the higher which is immortal, and must suffer the pains of slavery for his disobedience to the Work-Man, his maker. But if he inclines to the higher, then he is truly wise and blest."
X. "Should man, after being attracted by the vanities of the world and then, after obtaining a knowledge of the things that are, return to the vanities of the world, he will be punished with torments and fire in the darkest states of disembodied souls."
XI. "Should a man after knowing the things that are become rebellious of restraint to that part which is immortal, and return to the vanities of the world, the higher essence will straightway depart from him, and he will become the slave of the lower essence which will seize upon him and drive him to all sorts of wicked arts and evil ways."
XII. "When man has thus impiously disobeyed his Creator and turned his face away from that which is immortal, behold, he is then disinherited from his birthright, and is no longer counted among the children of God, because he has become an evil, perverse thing, possessing only those things which are mortal, and he is punished with death."
XIII. "And so death is meted out to all those who rebel against their Creator impiously, because they know the things that are. But to those foolish souls who are ignorant, and who have not knowingly rejected their Creator, behold, they are purified after much sufferings and are sent to the world again."".

I never knew that Hermes wrote about the laws of death, but here we are. You learn new stuff every day. He's mentioned in another part that the dark satellite is the moon of a dead planet, which many call Nibiru. Sitchin who wrote the fairy tales of lizard aliens coming to earth and creating humans jumped on this and now we have "ancient aliens" on the history channel, to those of you who remember that.

So this is another level connection. When searching for this so called dark satellite it returns heaps about this "black knight satellite" so called conspiracy. very funny. Seems this is well known then if there's wiki particles written about it. I became aware of this term through "Annunaki Homeworld" by Jason Breshears who's also got a book called "when the sun darkens" which outlines various incidents of such nature recorded through history, other than just eclipses. So this dark satellite is the orbiting moon of a dead planet, and in the model that Jason mentioned above lays out he's saying that the return of Nibiru in surprisingly the year 2046 that's called "nemesis unknown" reflects the end of the Mayan calendar we've talked about here which is the end of this world, in a metaphysical sense, because from there it will be nothing but pure slavery for all on earth, or at least those who aren't living as themselves.

Burgoyne is pretty much saying that these people are the personification of evil and thrive off us buying into their fictions to gain power. How? RS says that processes integrated within other processes generate higher order proportion and thus access to more current which is a mathematical reflection of the exponential increase of C at a rate of phi per level of integration. This is how light has been measured at over 300X C before, which I've found papers writing about such measurements done in experiments from years ago. This is not new. C is just a base constant to be further amplified. Evil filth propagate through feeding off others buying into their fictions and gain power whenever we believe in them. We keep their processes going by overlapping them thematically speaking. This is why actually, correctly living to destroy evil is to shine brighter than it so that it can't influence you. When you are the supply then others will be forced to orbit you, so to say. These 7 kings thrive off us feeding into their trash, and technology that's used to deliver us specifically crafted data to feed into our processes which cause us to overlap their processes deeper without us realizing is how they feed off our vitality and suck our life away. Remember, ignorance isn't what I'm talking about, I'm talking about being aware of this data, and not pretending like it doesn't matter, but simply to understand that anything that's not serving your higher function is feeding their process because whatever is outside of your own supply is feeding other processes and makes you become dependent on that supply for vital current to move. Their impulses become your own, instead of your own being your inner truth driving you. This is why getting real matters. The parasites in power are puppets of the 7 kings of the dark satellite who's "planet" is in ruin and thus requires a new host to live from. The annunaki are the "watchers" in the Enochian texts, and in the bible. The Juize are waiting for 2056 to come so that their plan can be fully realized. Once again, if there is no plan, then obviously everything I've said is just made up trash out of the mind of a loony. Make up your own mind.

I just remembered an idea I had ages back in early 2022 when I was starting to put together what is now RS. "Reality wheels". That's what I called them. Processes which held LITERAL MOMENTUM behind them. Processes that are highly proportionate and crystalized. How does this work? You've got lots of other people buying into your reality wheel, and they feed into it. You emanate this signature through the assumption, but obviously that's based on what you experience for real. the reality of experience. People say anxiety as an emotion kills momentum but I say it's not the emotional feeling but more or less that the anxiety causes someone who experiences it to be narrowed in their view to draw their movement away from where they're wanting to go and into the direction of lack.

Just because we are able to see through the trash, doesn't mean we're also able to emanate our own supply and be the one who drives others.

Most of the "original" bible is written by Amorites, Imeru/Amurru and those were typical Aryan light people. Tall, blonde hair, blue eyes, all that stuff. Notes below.

"Much of the Old Testament Bible, including many ancient texts, originated from the Amorites, an ancient Near Eastern people who ruled regions like Babylon, Mari, Ugarit, Byblos, and Syria around 1800 BC. These Amorite writings were later rewritten and edited by Jewish scribes. The Jews composed many texts after the fact, often writing in future tense to create the appearance of prophecy, and they incorporated and adapted Amorite materials into their scriptures. Thus, the core ancient narratives and writings came from the Amorites, while the Jews produced later versions, edits, and additional texts that shaped the Bible as known today."

That's what's similar to my original thesis when studying Britain and such. Where did the original salvation doctrine stem from? It seems going up against Juize in the system is an integral part of this doctrine, as "awakening" also involved being aware (more conscious) of the systems of limitation they enact on us and detaching from their influence over us. If the original biblical material is written in regions around Babylon then it would make sense considering the Enuma Elish is very similar to OT stories and seeming metaphysics and history.

I've been contemplating on this idea about the higher genius and us as lesser corporeal beings, and how according to scripture we're predestined for eternity. I understand the alchemy, though something about me is still questioning this point. It's CLEAR that the lesser yang conscious thinking mind when you die continues as it does, though the higher genius doesn't gain more experience from that iteration of reality. You see when you're going about this live experience through the frame of NEEDING to because you're going to be destroyed if you don't complete the work is a bad way of looking at things. Salvation, being saved, being saved from ignorance of being. Realization is an integration of components. Thing is, considering that through history the "star of David" as it's called (which I believe is actually the star of Remphan) an an alchemical symbol representing the integration of the 4 elements into one overlapping substance isn't what the mysteries claim, but that it's a symbol marking the deceptive nature of NEEDING to to some alchemical allegorical work in order to inherit eternal life. Dual seedline doctrine says we're all saved if we're of the light lineage. That's clear, and there's a TON of examples which point to this being the case. I've written over 1000 pages of notes in total over the years on that study, and yet it doesn't explain how the alchemy exists because the condition of salvation is blood. That's a coherent doctrine, even if it's not what is LIKED that's still there. Once again, then there's the alchemical interpretation, which means we still have a condition on salvation by which necessary overlaps of states to integrate components is necessary. Reading through what NG wrote, clearly outlined that this is part of his later doctrine. I've done studies on that which you can read. Then there's the immortal being perspective for lack of a better term which is mostly what NG buys into saying that there's no alchemy to be done in terms of the experience of inner transformation through the "mysteries" in ways such as gazing and taking quintessence and all that stuff. What he's saying is that this is simply to gather experience, for the sake of it. I don't buy into that. That sounds really dumb to me, though he says that's for the function of expansion. Thing is that expansion requires pressure, as we know. How do we blend all this together?

We know that by blood/nature we're already redeemed. This more or less means that your consciousness is eternal and cannot be destroyed. Does this contradict the alchemical perspective? Not really, since the higher genius as we know it has all of the experience of every iteration, though that doesn't mean you have complete access to all of that unless you've expanded enough in this one to tap that. So if the higher genius is the immortal aspect, and the corporeal persona is the mortal part, then we can say that more or less, the body is the corporeal part (not just lesser yin but also yang would HAVE TO come into that too), the projected emanation through the thematic interface where the greater yin and yang are eternal parts. Those are what's guaranteed to be saved, but for what? Why descend? To gather experience. This is mostly what the alchemical perspective has as the functional mechanism for salvation, the integration of the components of lesser and greater. I will say that this happens over the course of multiple iterations OR in one, though in one isn't really a thing as far as I know. It's always stretched out over time, over multiple iterations, which all gather data and experience. To what end though, for expansion into what? Complete quintessence. To take the base elements up into a higher order nature, but what does that reflect? What is that product? What psychological functions come out of that? This is the question. We know that as a result of deeper overlap between states of yin and yang or conscious and unconscious we will experience more of our nature and be our own supply. This is the PRODUCT of expansion, is it not? Operating as yourself, and not as a function of the conditioning of this place. So, in that sense we can now separate out the trash from the gems. The functions that NG talks about as the means of expansion means to operate as yourself more, which is by moving through natural striving, to fulfil your vision, mediate the pressure driving you to be yourself into reality. To create YOUR OWN reality and have that unfold through who you're being FOR REAL. That's the "test", right. Are you going to live according to the conditioning of others or as yourself? If you're already saved, by blood, then that means your composition is already correct for that condition. There's endless passages in scripture which talk about God only dealing with those of Israel. This whole desire manifesting stuff more or less is an extension of the idea of how you're here to manifest what's within you.

In my opinion then, taking all these parts, about composition of components AKA blood, and the capacity for expansion AKA the inner alchemy and transformation, and also the desired reality manifesting stuff which is you being your own supply tapping from higher genius over other peoples conditioning, then we can put together a pretty coherent picture by which ALL of these doctrines can line up. Dual seedline says blood pre-destines salvation, which we can metaphysically infer as thematic composition and innate capacity being there for this work to be done. The template exists, and therefore salvation is guaranteed, pre-determined. Alchemy necessitates challenge exists by which transformation can unfold through which is the gold we make led into. The immortal being is who's looking through the thematic translation layer which interfaces into this corporeal form. Every iteration is experienced by the higher genius, which is why it gains all the memory and stuff. Thing is I want to expand more on this point. I believe strongly that overcoming the trash of this world, AKA Juize and how they're the main supply of conditioning for us, is a BIG part of this process of expansion and what pressure we need to gain experience of mediation through. We're not here to beat them, we're just not. Let's be real. That's never happened throughout history ever and it's not prophesied that this will be the case. We're simply suppose to live as though there's no overshadowing limits on us from their parasitic systems and live as though we're operating from who we are and stand before the enemy of this world and our expansion and look them in the eye with courage FROM THE EYES OF THE HIGHER GENIUS AND NOT GIVE A DAMN. What does this mean? It means that you don't fear this world, it means that you see this world as filled with evil filth for a purpose and if you can see it and still operate as yourself and manifest experiences that you're not compromising on for conditioning, then you've turned lead into gold. The inner alchemy, given all the experience I've had with this, is more or less simply for the purpose of WILLINGLY facing DEEPER levels of conditioning to integrate those parts, but as I've always said, regardless of what the alchemist or anyone would say, functionally living this stuff out in the world for real and being real as yourself is DOING THE SAME THING. Why wouldn't it? That's why I believe that ultimately you never need to know the inner alchemy to attain immortality, really. I believe that the deeper states of overlap of those processes afford access to can be done by running up against the physical manifestation of Jewish filth in this world. Disgusting Jewish filth. Running up against that as the physical manifestation of those conditioning processes does the same thing.

So, to put it together. We have capacity (blood/yin/template/structure) to expand and gain experience (for the purposes of seeing more of what reality is and operating as yourself over what the conditioning wants you to buy into MEANING YOU'RE IN ESSENCE THEN CREATING WHO YOU ARE AS A TESTINOMY OF CHRIST/SALVATION) which is the gold which the alchemical side attains, and then the immortal aspect simply gathers this experience and takes that away from needing further iterations and moves onto whatever next level there is which takes what we do here as a part of what that level needs. This is the "work to be done in him" AKA the corporeal being gaining this experience for the higher genius to take into another level. This is why I see the level of what NG said about "imagination is the only reality" means in essence, is that operating as higher genius MEANS OPERATING MORE FUNCITONALLY IN HIGHER STATES AS YOURSELF AND THUS CLOSER TO YOUR CAPACITY. Right? BEING IMMORTAL MEANS TO OPERATE AS YOURSELF BECAUSE YOU'RE UNFOLDING INNER TRUTH THEN AND ACTUALLY "CREATING". Instead of manifesting someone else's stuff, you manifest what's within you. This I believe is the overarching nature of what this place is for. You have an innate capacity for immorality and abundance because the parts are there, reflecting the higher genius perfectly, which means that expansion is available through this corporeal being existing in a collective conditioning field and thus those who "overcome the world" means OVERCOMING JEWISH CONDITIONING. Seeing these things as they are is part of the test, and as I've always really said, being "awake" means seeing things for what they are, on ALL levels. This seems to more or less be a test of perceptions and truth, not in a sort of martyrdom type scenario but in the sense of we should only see this iteration as just that, as that your life here IS SIMPLY THE FUNCTIONAL PROJECTION OF "REAL" SELF TO BE PUT UNDER STAKES TO TEST YOUR ABILITY TO TAKE WHAT YOU OVERCOME INTO THE LEVEL BEYOND THIS. Is this not what individuation is? Is this not what cutting through conditioning is? Operating as yourself, being more individuated, integrating those components, is the overarching function of expansion and so because we have all the parts to make that happen and that this is all just temporary for the function of expansion, then we can see reality for what it is and operate AT THAT STATE. THIS SHIFT IN PERCEPTIONS AND TRUTH LEADS ONE TO MAKING CORRECT DECISIONS AS THEMSELVES BECAUSE IT IMPLIES THEY'RE "FREE" OF CONDITONING AND HAVE COMPLETED THE WORK. Right? Simply "doing what you want" IS THE WORK. Right? The test is, will you allow conditions to prevent you? This is the functional process of manifesting. Going all the way.

Does this not link everything together then and expand the metaphysical analysis of this process? Seeing this being AS JUST A THROWAWAY COMPONENT IF NEED BE OPENS UP COURAGE TO BREAK PATTERNS OF DYSFUNCTION BECAUSE YOU'RE NOT ACTUALLY LOSING ANYTHING AND YET YOU'RE GAINING EVERYTHING. You're doing the work, in gaining expansion, being real. Being real is where all the work is done, Deeper inner alchemy leads to the same functional processes being opened up, you're facing pressure in DIFFERENT ways, though in my opinion, isn't necessary to COMPLETE the work. I know many people who are VERY expanded when it comes to subconscious activation AND YET they're still totally illiterate when it comes to the collective conditioning of the system in place that I've identified since I was very young. I believe we're all at different stages of breaking through that level, among others, but just because you've got massive subconscious space and can see through walls and stuff doesn't mean you're immortal in the more pure sense, because there's still no gold that comes out of that person. What's the gold? Someone who creates their own life in their own image despite all the conditioning around them. They become impervious. They just be, and when faced with something which would threaten their paradigm they know how to cut through it because they know the feelings of the nervous system are just temporary and never permanent. It's the person who "has" Christ who operates correctly. It's not any one act, or even a series of acts, of creative things you make here, or whatever, it's a "state" of being that you're operating from without fear determining who you're being because you see through the conditioning. That right there is the magic, and this is also why being spontaneous is the efficient way of opening up this capacity because you're not drawing anything out. You're just "doing the work" in the moment, AKA unfolding what's within and manifesting your truth. It's not about the goal, really, as in WHAT you create, but that the gold is attained, that the baseline state of function is able to see through the trash and just "pull out" from seeing this as "real" and operate from higher genius perception more or less. This is what I actually said way way back in my old vids. Full circles again.

Sooooo. Being "in" Christ, having been elect before the foundation of the world, having being chosen by God beyond the higher genius BY WHCH THE HIGHER GENIUS IS STILL BOUND TO (you're ACTUALLY the higher genius and the more you live from that perception the more you're "gold" and "in Christ"), is more or less a matter of ripeness in the degree of expansion already attained. This is my Reality Synthesis of the biblical functions of alchemy and such, from a very broad view. Operating as yourself, out of that pressure, is the function of transforming lead to gold, right. That realization of "this is just temporary pressure" gradually opens up perception of "this whole world is just trying to keep me in the box and isn't real" and thus we give context to what NG says with "imagination is the only reality". THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH YOUR IMAGINAL SENSES OVERRIDE EVERYTHING BECAUSE THEY DON'T BUT THAT THE INNER TRUTH IS THE ONLY REALITY. Your inner truth, how that unfolds is the only reality. The Juize who condition the whole world are just one level of this, because eventually you'll run into it. They lie, they deceive, they manifest massive conditioning processes that you'll be sucked into and buy into and operate from blindly, and seeing that for what it is is the alchemical overlap and then creating truth underlying that AKA "this isn't real" is the magic which affords you to transform into gold, AKA into YOURSELF. YOU ARE THE TECHNIQUE. Operating from your own process of reality AKA "imagination is the only reality" now makes sense functionally. Higher state, more of yourself, more gold, more product of election and capacity realized. We are projects of what's beyond the higher genius, for the higher genius AKA the "imaginal" you or the REAL you who's looking in through the eyes of corporeal you, we're the "trained" simulated beings being refined through trial by fire and the self correction mechanism keeps us on track.

Remember. We're chosen. We're saved by the grace of God, always. It's not ALL us, and knowing that, that there's an influence that's nudging you along and showing you the way, that means you're not alone in this. I've always said I was chosen, I didn't do this work. It was what came through me, among other parts of my being which played the roles necessary.

Do you know why I believe that salvation is bound to facing the Jewish filth? Because it's the collective form of pressure. Reproving it, calling it out for what it is, as evil filth and disgusting parasitic degeneracy is a functional and divine act, because YOU'RE RIGHT! I cannot see someone who's attained immortality that would bend the knee to take the cov shots and be devalued like that. What a load of trash. That event right there proved who's saved and who's not, spiritually. Everybody who got shot was marked. That event was part of the seals opening, though I still believe that those people can "wake up" and reprove evil afterwards. The work we do here demonstrates this. Having a big number of followers means nothing to the quality of this work. Being functional means calling out trash for what it is, because you can see through it and don't compromise and accept going along to get along. This doesn't mean you storm the gates of hell as a one man army, but that you're not a mat for Juize to walk on, which is their goal. You're here to contrast that, in the scale that your experience affords.

Look. See it like this. There's nothing in this world for you, this world is full of filth that wants you to lick the boot. When you're PAST THAT, you've SEEN THROUGH IT. That's the gold. This isn't an escapist attitude, but that you carry this attitude, (NG defines states also as "attitudes of mind") into the next iteration, if there will be one. You don't need another iteration if you see through the trash though, because you're now NOT OF THIS WORLD. YOU SEE THE TRASH OF THIS WORLD AND SEE THROUGH IT. Have we ever considered that seeing that you're not of this world means that you're not someone who will just mindlessly conform to these boxes of conditioning and accept them, more so than to do inner alchemy? If it's mechanically about overlapping states, meaning facing pressure to expand capacity, then wouldn't this be involved in functionally the same process? You're being MOVED BY GOD ARE YOU NOT? This COMES THROUGH YOU. When you're chosen, when you can see, it's because God is behind you guiding you, as I've always said, and you have to move with that. Faith in that inner truth, that invisible hand of intuitive understanding. where else is there to go? That's why you're not of this world, because this world is the training ground to attain the testimony of Christ. The kinsman redeemer redeems all who are of his blood, his GEN, metaphysically representing a composition of components in a template.

Individuation, expansion, not being of this world AKA not of the conditioning that's hoisted upon us all at baseline, having turned lead into gold, having put on Christ, having the testimony of him, having the immortal capacity realized by having seen through the game and that this was JUST a game after all. and that there was never anything to fear. This to me, sounds like the result IN A COMMON SENSE PERSPECTIVE of what someone who's done the work represents and lives by. They'd effectively be a master manifestor. The alchemical stuff opens up further expansion even beyond that it seems, but according to this idea, that's still optional. I wrote a lot before about how we exist here to expand and not going through that complete transformation of joining all the parts means that we're going to roam the underworld for a few thousand years comes from alchemical traditions and what I've learned from the alchemist. This is traditional alchemical perspective, hermetic mostly. I don't know about you, but given ALL the variables at play we've gone over, I see the "wake up in the dream" perspective and LIVE BY THAT FOR REAL quality as the work being done, because REALLY once you're IN THAT and OPERATE FOR REAL by that then you can't go back. It should be a THRESHOLD of transformation, that "marks" you to God. Quintessence. Your components are aligned. We're "saving" our world, because we know that's the only reality. We overlap the collective, and will be overlapping it, but that doesn't mean it influences us to be someone we're not. That's what I mean, that's what I see the practical outcomes of this to be, and the inner alchemy stuff is EXTRA ON TOP which is also working the same mechanical functions. You're chosen by God.

You could say then, that the truth lies in the middle of all the doctrines we've gone over. Dual seedline represents that the blood bonds you to salvation, AKA the substantive template and lineage. Do you have the makeup of someone who qualifies for the promise? Then we have the mechanism of transformation through pressure and overlapping states. Alchemy. Turning lead into gold. Then we have the whole "imagination is the only reality" and seeing THROUGH the game of the systems of this world and not being moved by them as a function of individuation which is another level of the inner alchemy. That's the overlap between these different levels. Make of it what you wish.

Reacting to the trash and actually compromising and buying into other peoples processes manifests unsatisfying outcomes. You supply, not receive and react because it's not what you want. How do you do that? It's as I said. Shock yourself into the reality you want. Go all the way and break every part of your life down that doesn't work at the same time. Be as spontaneous as possible. Totally become someone new.

23/9/25

Apollo is the god the Juize are bound to worship. YHVH is Apollo. There's actually coins from 106BC which have Apollo in Greek on one side and on the other side IN HEBREW it has the tetragrammaton YHVH. Why? Why does this coin exist with these 2 on it together. We've gone over Apollo before and I heard reference to the YHVH being linked to Apollo but I didn't believe it. I thought that was a stretch because the entirety of the work NG produced says that YHVH means what we went over in prior entries, the 4 "mighty ones". That doesn't seem to be true, at least that's not the full picture. I always saw his analysis of the tetragrammaton as very shallow and vague, but this might be something which opens up a whole new level. Yeah, the tetragrammaton is a hand, or a fist. Meru foundation figured that out which I saw way before I even read anything NG wrote, and I've heard NG reference the fist as well. "The hand of God" and his hammer and such, he's mentioned this in his 4 mighty ones lecture, or something like that. Isn't that crazy though, God would have a hand and a hammer. Forging. Mason. Freemasons. Juize. Wonder hey? I don't say that's conclusive that the Juize really do worship Apollo but it seems to be this way given all the surrounding symbolism they hide in plain sight and in the alchemical texts. I don't think even the alchemist recognizes this, and yet I'm suppose to take his analysis of this alchemy as unbiased. How can I have any unbiased alchemical view with this as a factor in the equation? Everything seems to have trash overlaying it in some way shape or form. Nobody out there has a fully complete understanding of EVERY variable, they all seem to buy into SOMETHING that's deceptive, and I obviously have my own blind spots to this too.

I just brought up a new level when I did pathway work today. Very interesting stuff. I can say that with 100% certainty given all the data that being spontaneous is the magic trick. Intuitive impulse is simply a rising of kidney yang and liver qi dispersing through the body in response to a conceptual resonance given the currents are available to facilitate that which makes you WANT to break processes of dysfunction and form new processes that correspond PHYSICALLY to that experience you desire. This VERY SIMPLY means that you'll disengage from ACTIONS in your life that correspond to you being in that lower state, of function. The actions MATTER A LOT. Obviously, though I will say THEY ONLY MATTER TO THE EXTENT THAT YOU'RE SPONTANEOUS IN APPLYING THEM. Waving in and out of action over long periods of time is useless and a waste of time. Unless that process is baseline then the actions will be automatic, and there won't be ups and downs since it's established as par to your self recursive circuit. How did I manifest the SP overnight that time, and other times since then? I was IMPULSIVE AND SPONTANEOUS BECAUSE I HAD TONS OF PRESSURE MOVING ME THROUGH THAT TRASH. This is what cutting through conditioning is all about. You'll have that vital current driving you towards saying "NO SCREW YOU I'M WAY PAST THIS NOW!" and bury it THROUGH HOW YOU RESPOND TO LIFE. In that instance, I didn't need to act differently, but those are VERY VERY RARE. Do NOT take that as a general guideline, because it's not how it'll work for most. You have to be SO FILLED WITH FURY to make that work. I believe that the deeper you overlap states then the less action is necessary because the transformation is being done there and then instead of THROUGH the actions but it's the same functional process, which you should know by now. Imagination is only used to suggest experiences and comprise targets for the intuitive level intention AKA "targeting sense". That's really all there is.

Any time there's a spontaneous feeling of current that's leading you towards a desired outcome AND YOU DON'T ACT YOU WILL DIP VERY HARD. All that vitality NEEDS to go somewhere. If you hold it, then it turns into trauma. Trauma, is imply stuck current that then needs more spontaneity to break it down and move it through correct experiences which thematically fulfil what was compromised on before. Everything else is trash. Throw it all out.

Most of what I've written here was spontaneous.

Notes on Marduk.

"Who is Marduk? Marduk is the patron god of ancient Babylon, originally known as Amor Udaac in Sumerian records and later called Merodach in Akkadian. He is the same figure as Nimrod in the Bible and is associated with the hero god who slew the sky monster Tiamat using a lightning spear called the labrys. Marduk's story is linked to the rise of Babylon after the fall of the Akkadian Empire, and he is considered a central figure in various ancient texts, including Jewish writings where his life and deeds are recorded under different names but refer to the same person."

Ok so I've finally found differentiation between the Imeru and the Amorites. Imeru were NOT white. Amorites WERE white. I knew there was an error considering my sources had opposing qualities. The Israelites of the bible, according to this categorization, were Amorites, Phonecams, Aramaeans. Syrians. These are all light people. Imeru and Ameru are different, despite sounding the same, which is why I got mixed up. The Israelites of the bible are Mediterranean light people.

Enki was the title of a ruler. This is the biblical Enoch, as far as I know, to cross reference traditions. He is also Loki, the one who tricked the other gods. 1447BC is the year of the Exodus of the bible. So it's said that the covenant between Abraham and God AKA the Abrahamic covenant (which the light people fulfil) is different from the covenant about keeping the so called law of the rest of the Mosaic books. The Mosaic law was imposed on us by another god. This is the thing, different entities in history are all called "God" or "LORD" or whatever you read in the bible but aren't always the same. The tetragrammaton that NG talks about as I AM is not actually the same as the God of Genesis who created the world again and told man to replenish the earth. So according to this interpretation, there's different FACTIONS of individuals serving different interests who are all referred to as "God" in the bible but aren't always the same. NG makes the assumption that this is the case. How do we know this? Cross reference with the other systems that exist out there. Does the alchemy overlap? Not directly. The alchemist I talk to has continued to tell me that Hermetic systems do not overlap Daoist systems. Thing is, in Daoist systems, there's actually 8 kings, which is correct, because in the days of ancient Sumer there were 8 kings but the 8th didn't get to rule because the great flood was on the way, and so the other systems have 7 kings, or gods. Do these represent the different archetypal powers of alchemy or the gods AKA the kings? Historically speaking, they're the kings, and these archetypal powers are extrapolated powers from these people who ruled the world in the ancient days.

So the I AM so called God in the burning bush that Moses speaks to was not the same God as is the one who gave the Abrahamic covenant. The Levites had their own law too, to atone for sin with sacrifice. Was sacrifice necessary in the days of Abraham? No. The thing is that God tested Abraham to see if he would kill his son. So I still say, are they the same? If there was no Isaac then there would be no Jacob, and no Israel. Reading it from the perspective of an overseer vs an intelligence with a vetted interest in pushing law and control, is the frame that's portrayed here to distinct the "gods". It's said that the Levites were the ones who followed the "leviathan". You see, if you read the older books in the OT and overlay that on Jesus the Christ then you get a story that is in fact NOT starkly different, because Christ did in fact go hard. Some claim that Christ was fully peaceful and all that, but that's not true. This is why the Austrian painter said that Christ was a warrior for truth. Why did he say that? Why did he call Christ a warrior? Because his acts were racist, as I've explored very deeply in my older study. Most people can't see that, but it's there. If you assume that everybody he's talking to are mixed when he's doing the sermon on the mount (which they weren't if we take context into account) then it's supporting the universalism perspective but I simply can't see that, which once again is why I see seedline doctrine to be clear as the literal interpretation. That's also not to say that the position of the YHVH god of the burning bush I AM being different from the Abrahamic covenant and Christ god, but it's not super clear either way. If we apply come common sense to things and don't take context into account in the text, then you will say they're different, because a "loving God" wouldn't kill people. I agree. God did in fact kill many Israelites, sometimes for very whacked reasons if we're real. Most of the commandments were to eradicate foreign people. Thing is, that this God is likely a different ruler who was also called God who isn't clearly communicated to the reader. I need to overlap these accounts further with other traditions and see what lines up. Perhaps someone has done that study to make my job easier but I don't know.

The amount of reading that I need to do is insane.

The Israelites, AKA the light people. WERE the ORIGINAL carriers of the alchemical traditions, and the OT tradition which became Celtic and all this stuff we talked about before. The Juize took all that and warped it. They serve I AM, which I mean NG is flat out WRONG about the bible being a JEWISH book. It's not in it's core tradition. The NT teachings of the Christ IS AN ISRAELITE TRADITION, as I proved clearly by studying Celtic people and what they believed even before we got into ancient history.

721BC is when the 10 lost tribes narrative begins when they scatter after captivity. We are the descendants of those people, as I've explored before. Some whack heads out there still want to cling to this JEWISH filth that they're the people through the whole text but they're obviously not.

Hermes is Enoch and Enki from the Sumerian tradition. He was an alchemist.

More interesting notes I've not heard for like 3 years.

"an ancient copy of the original gospel, consisting of the words of Jesus (the red letters) along with 13 letters attributed to Paul, was in the possession of Marceon, a navigator nearly 2000 years ago. This collection, originally circulated as the Gospel of Marceon, represented the original idea of Christianity focused on the Logos and spiritual teachings of Christ, distinct from later church writings (the black letters) added by scribes."

Gospel of Marceon. It's said that Paul's 13 letters were from someone named "Apollonius". Apollon. Apollo. You know who Apollo is in Greek? Messenger of God, shortened to Paul. Interesting. This seems to line up well with my idea that Christ was teaching the Israelites alchemy, purity, manifestation, and that this world is temporary.

It's still said that there's zero evidence that Christ was crucified. I remember hearing about how it was impossible for someone to be crucified in 3 days from facing a charge because Pilate would need to have sent messages to Tiberius who was ruling at the time and gain permission to execute. Also makes you question Tacitus with his quotes about how Pilate was very ruthless, because in the bible he seemed to not be like how Tacitus writes, which I questioned when we went through that text. It's very likely that much of the physical scenario that Christ was involved in through the NT gospels AKA virgin birth and many miracles and the crucifixion and all that stuff was added in afterwards, which people still to this day attach as necessary belief for salvation in the conventional Christian doctrine but I've always seen that as stupid even from a dual seedline perspective. There's ZERO importance on such for salvation, no matter what valid doctrine you view it through, and considering that NG still believes that the crucifixion story was real, it makes me personally question much more of his teaching, which we should all do considering his lack of clear communication of these things in his writings. His vagueness makes me once again question his real understanding of scripture, as well as his so called mystical experiences and what was driving those. This crucifixion as he explained he experienced with the 10 vortices (why 10?) sounds a lot like something he had through his subjective synthesis and that this isn't actually part of divine scripture which as far as I know I've never read anywhere and yet he spoke of these experiences he had as something everyone will have. I don't see ANY alchemical association to these experiences, though SOME of them do, like the golden light rising, which I've had bits of myself, and many others have and will.

Notebook page 28: https://realitysynthesis.com/pages/aetheraeon-notebook-28

Item added to your cart

Aetheraeon Notebook 27

Aetheraeon Notebook 27

Country/region