Aetheraeon Notebook 30

"Its appearance in the world is harvest so you and I may harvest anything we desire but we must first have a seedtime. It must be preceded by a moment of response or an attitude. How often you say, “I approached it in the wrong attitude” or “He is in the wrong attitude” or “You must change your attitude if you would get on in this life”. I have said it . . you have said it . . maybe we have said it to each other . . but we know the importance of right attitude. We know this much: that I can change my attitude if circumstances change . . that’s automatic. We know that if something happens suddenly in my world of which up to that moment I was not aware, I, becoming aware of a change of circumstance would automatically produce in myself a change of attitude. We all do that, morning, noon and night, but that’s not important, that is a reflect of life. Ninety-nine percent of the world reflect life."

"Now, can I consciously, can I voluntarily, can I deliberately produce in myself a change of attitude, one of my own discretion, one that I myself single out, and not one that is determined by or in any way is dependent on a stimulus of a change in the object itself. Must you change before I will change my attitude towards you? We know that if you do change I will change my attitude towards you, but must I go through life simply reflecting these changes in the objects, and can I not deliberately determine the change prior to the change in the object?"

This is NG telling us that we need to not be dependent on the change to feel the attitude shift. "I, becoming aware of a change of circumstance would automatically produce in myself a change of attitude." That's a pretty clear statement. He's telling us that the inner experience produces the change in attitude, not the other way around. I will argue that our lives should to the degree that we have available, autosuggest to us who we want to be.

"So that is our privilege, that is our choice. If you believe it, aren’t you amazed at the kind of things that you planted, at the kind of seedtime that in our ignorance, in our sleep, we allowed to actually scatter in our world?"

That's an interesting quote. He said seedtime in our sleep. Is he saying that our reactions on the dream level also constitute seedtime that manifest? If that's what he's implying then his sleeping in SATS with a positive mood thing is flawed. Heavily flawed. I've been that way where I sleep when I'm in such a positive state and yet I have horrible terrible nightmares. It's like that night I woke up suddenly after a decent day and I had dreams of me dying and then I woke up and actually experienced that. It was something that to me cannot work, there's so many times I have slept in seemingly positive moods and yet nothing positive showed up in dreams, especially in my past when I was anxious 24/7. All those times don't work, though if you'd say then that my dreams came from something else, then why would he say then that dreams themselves are seedtime as well?

"If man could only remember these moments of seedtime, he would never be surprised when the harvest appears in his world. But because he has no memory as to that moment in time when he dropped that seed, which is simply his emotional response to something he contemplated, something he overheard, something he observed, at that moment the thing was done; he didn’t have to labor to bring it to harvest . . he simply encountered it as something already full grown, so he reaps now that on which he bestowed no labor, outside of choice. He selected it by his attitude, by his reaction."

Well here is NG telling us what "causes" manifesting. I can't say this is always true based on my observations, considering I've manifested things from fleeting thoughts without feeling of any kind, including "wondering" and such that's not a thought FROM the end but of more or less. Clients tell me the same thing, where they say "I'd like if X happened" and it does, including SP contact. This to me proves that there's more to this. I find that the stability of the shen seems to facilitate results most reliably, which will stem from the results of implied involvement that's meaningful and suggests that you're now the person you want to be. It's like when you're consistently persisting in living the expansion of your sense of self in meaningful ways, then you'll find that positive things will show up and people will want to be involved with you more. You could also argue that shen being stable could also validate what NG says, and the reason why would be that if your shen is stable then you'd not be activating seedtime for all the bad reactions and stuff that would imply lack and being stuck in the box still conforming to conditions that continue to show up in the world. If then you're not reacting to the trash and you do what I said in the last page of the notebook then you'll almost certainly end up only working seedtime for functional things that are satisfying. Therefore, no matter how you look at it, applying RS as it's been outlined makes it happen naturally anyway since you're optimizing your experience of reality overall to support a stable shen where negative reactions to the trash is next to dead. If you have small little reactions here and there then it's so what big deal, I've had bits of reactions too at times and positive stuff still shows up, even sometimes expectedly and not this unexpected abundance. When you're constantly seeking the approval you'll never be satisfied. You can't be and so you'll always feel that intuitive sense of lack, that subtle sensation of something that's wrong, and the only way you'll disappear that voice is by getting real with how you feel and starting to remove the problems from your life in meaningful ways. I still totally disagree that we shouldn't "lift a finger to make it happen" because that's the very attitude that kept me stuck for years wasting my life for useless trash of people who are all heavily conditioned themselves. Screw that. I made progress the fastest when I cut out all the trash for good and moved on, but that did involve me needing to drop them off the importance scale to please them, so no matter how you see it this mechanism is still worked anyway where the shen will detach from needless conditions and thus not activate seedtime for the bad reactions that buy into the conditions.

"You’re not coming here to be told how bad the world is, for if you believe it is bad, there is something you must do about it because you have planted the world. You have your seedtime. So here people gather to be told how to operate this wonderful gift that the Father gave them. There is this wonderful mind and imagination. So you are told to go out and be choosey in your selection; single out that aspect of reality to which you want to respond, success, health, dignity, nobility, something wonderful that you contribute to the good of the world. As you walk by you are contributing to society, you contribute to the community in which you live, not necessarily by giving dollars but you contribute by your wonderful seedtime. If, in your community, you see the need of maybe a church, you see the need of some wonderful school, you don’t wait until people get together, you actually, in your mind’s eye, contemplate the joy that is yours because of the wonderful school here for the children, a wonderful church here to lift man spiritually, and you wonder what it would be like were it true; . . you feel the thrill of witnessing it within. That is seedtime. Then in a way that you do not know and you need not labor to produce, you will encounter that school and that church and these lovely things in your community."

Well there it is. More of NG telling us that seedtime is the experience of something being true for you there and then. A reaction to something, good or bad, consciously or unconsciously. That must also mean to some extent that even subtle thoughts without much feeling can also do it, though in another lecture he says they don't. That's not my experience though. You can feel emotionally "bad" and yet still have good things show up, which is how that SP manifestation worked back in the day that I've talked about on videos.

"This morning you take not only yourself . . start with self . . then turn to a friend in your mind’s eye, and congratulate him on his good fortune . . congratulate him on his expansion in his world, and actually feel the thrill of such contact . . at that moment of response that was a changed attitude in regard to that friend. . at that moment you planted. Now, in a way you do not know and you need not know, that seed is going to go through its normal natural hidden passage and appear as a reality in your world. Then you will know the power latent within you and you will stop reflecting life and you become one what I call a true creator in the sense that . . I mean creator . . that you are creating by selecting wise, wise, lovely things in this world and giving them expression in this world of ours."

Getting to this so called creator state requires you to detach from the expectations of the world. That's what you hold as important and keep having show up for you.

"So that’s what I mean by seedtime and harvest; the importance of the right attitude: and you can do it, you need not wait for circumstances to change, you need not wait for the stimulus of a change in the object to produce in yourself the change of attitude. In your office, does the boss act in a rude way towards you ?"

"Well then what would it be like if he now saw in me the lady, the helpful person that I really am, or want to be. Suppose he saw in me someone he could praise for my work and raise me in the salary world, give me an increase in salary because of my added effort; suppose he could see that in me, well, contemplate the boss seeing that in you as though he saw it and rewarded you with an increase."

"That moment is the moment of planting. It may not come tonight, it may not even come this week in the paycheck, but it will come. You simply keep on planting the lovely things; but if every day when you leave the office you say, “What a skinflint”, and you go home and you discuss him with your mother or your husband or someone else, and they sympathize because they really believe you, for they are playing the same reflective, negative approach to life; but if as you ride home or walk home, you walk in the attitude that he had done it . . he had increased your income, he had praised your work, and day after day, in spite of other things to the contrary, you persist in it, do you know he will do it? You will produce in him the change of heart because you first produced it in yourself, and he will see in you qualities that he cannot now see, and then your whole vast world begins to blossom . . you do it in every sense of the word. You know someone who is lonely . . one who really should be happily married in this world. What would it be like if you were told, not by the individual necessarily, but by a third party of the good news concerning John, concerning Mary or someone else. Someone desirous of a lovely home and a gracious home. What would it be like ? Don’t be envious. Try to rejoice. Feel the joy that is theirs, and that moment is seedtime for them. They will harvest it . . and that is our opportunity to go through the world planting and planting wisely."

This is him going on about how the emotion is simply to elicit a movement of current, that means something about us, and our relationship to the world. A shen that's raised up for a brief moment will activate "seedtime" it seems, good or bad. The stability of the shen is the most important variable therefore under the NG doctrine of manifestation.

"So go out wisely today . . go out determined to become more selective, more discreet in your choice of ideas you will entertain and single out the idea that would bless an individual and produce in yourself the emotional response that you have witnessed that state in his world, and know at that moment of response, you planted for that individual, and he is rooted in you, there is no such thing as he will not be found in your world for he is rooted in you. Everyone is rooted in you . . therefore you will not lose them. It is planted relative to that being and that being is going to harvest it, and you will know the harvest when it appears in his world. You simply plant and let the harvest take care of itself."

What does he mean about "It is planted relative to that being and that being is going to harvest it"? He also said that the emotional state is simply to elicit a witness to a state, to an attitude of mind, an experience that you had that means something. The seed is the activation of pathway cascades, states are seeds he says, and he also says that seeds are attitudes of mind. This is his quoted method of explaining these things. If manifestation is due to these moments of heightened awareness of experience then that would mean anything that you respond to at all in this world would cause seedtime and thus manifestations.

"Now, am I responsible for others in my world? I certainly am! When I take my little mind, my little imagination and think because it’s mine . . my Father gave it to me, that I can simply misuse it, it isn’t going to hurt another. I tell you, you do have to use more control for the simple reason I am rooted in you and you are rooted in everyone and all of us are rooted in God. There is no separate individual detached being in my Father’s Kingdom. We are one. I am completely responsible for the use or misuse of my imagination."

Also that. Apparently NG is responsible for everyone else in the world. He's saying that since there's one source of all things, which at the highest level of things is correct, then that means any alteration in the attitude of mind of you will impact others. That's why he's saying he's responsible.

"Now, the seedtime is when you imagine a state . . that’s the seedtime. That’s when you sow. And, then, in due season, you’re going to reap exactly what you sowed, so do not be deceived. You can’t sow the unlovely act and expect something other than the unlovely act to appear in your world. You can’t do it."

So to imagine a state is to experience a heightened awareness according to him, since he's given us many examples where you don't need to be IN the imaginal scene with sensory detail and he also said that in a lecture. This simple act of reaction, except he's saying you create your own reaction in a positive sense. You create an experience inwardly in some way shape or form that will elicit a response and thus alter your attitude of mind. Remember he did also say that the whole point of imaginal SATS at night was to get you to think from it during the next day. That's literally what he said in one of his other lectures. So he's never actually telling us to constantly imagine, but to be efficient with regularly experiencing an inward movement of current that thematically implies that we're the person we want to be now.

"So, here tonight, when I say, “Awake O Sleeper, and rise from the dead”, I’m appealing to you to become more and more aware of what you are imagining, for as you become more and more aware of what you are imagining, you are awakening. And, so you become every moment of time aware, and you refuse then to allow your imagination to entertain the unlovely things in the world, and you simply put it on the lovely you do it, and that moment that you do it you plant it, and then you have confidence in God’s unbroken law that it must come up, that you may harvest it. In due season it will rise, and in due season you will harvest it. It’s a law established in the very first chapter; read it in the 11th verse. It’s stated so clearly and so perfectly that no man can break it, and then it is captured in the last verse of the 8th chapter: that as long as the earth endures, seedtime and harvest shall never cease."

This idea that awakening is becoming more aware of what you imagine isn't entirely correct, but it's on the right path.

"So, seedtime . . you have it. Every time you imagine anything, that’s seedtime. And the harvest must follow; it can’t precede it. So, you have seedtime and harvest established forever and forever as long as the earth endures. And you are the one spoken of in 8th chapter. It is to you that the whole thing is addressed, for the whole thing is about you."

That can't be true, because if every time you imagine or think you activate seedtime, then you're contradicting what you said before that all of your thoughts that manifest have feeling behind them, meaning that's substantial and evokes naturalness.

" Everything told us in our scripture is true. As we told you earlier, that simple little gesture when it appeared before me and above me, why should I raise my hand? And why should it be my left hand? I raised the left hand and the left is always descent. He was descending upon me. I raised my hand automatically; and here came this hand and this finger projected; and then the symbol of the Holy Spirit rested upon it and then smothered me in kisses, just as told us in scripture. Then comes this eternal promise: “As long as the earth remains, seedtime and harvest shall not cease.” And so you and I…if there is seedtime there must be a sower, and then there will be a harvest. It shall not cease. So you and I can plant in this interval while we wait for the unfolding of the picture within us when we go back, and then we rise into a world completely subject to our imaginative power. But everything is put under our power, as told us in the 9th chapter of Genesis, but everything. Not one thing is left out. Everything is given into the hands of the individual after the flood subsides, after the new world appears."

Well now I need to know about what NG interprets the flood as.

"Let no one tell you that you are some little worm. You are here because there is that child of God to be separated from the outer form by which you are recognized when you walk the street. Exercise this power for everyone in the world and not only wish them well but identify yourself with your wish for them. Then it is done, and you do not need to raise a finger to make it so, you let it be so. They will conform to what you have done. It does not matter who they are, whether they are simple people or if they have degrees: these degrees are given by Esau to Esau, and you are only concerned with Jacob. Isaiah 49: “He who formed me from the womb to be his servant and to bring Jacob to him again.” There in your Bible you will read it. “How can you find him? He is so small. How can Jacob stand?” He will stand all right! How small he is I know, for the infinite ocean tossed me on its back and I know it did not care. It was doing it for a purpose; I was tossed all over its infinity. I was afraid to go to sleep when I sensed the approach of these nights, and then when I closed my eyes this separation took place. He was pulling me out of Himself. That was the great ocean of life. When you understand this you will know what the Flood means, and the true meaning of the story of the Ark."

I see. The flood is the world basically, the filling up of conditioning that we're born into that we separate out of and are restored from. The ark is the vessel I'd assume, where every kind is within the ark (all the thematic currents) and when the flood is over then you'll be restored?

"That vision did not come within the 1,260 days; it came after, so I recorded it in my Bible. If I had dropped this garment the night of the dove it would have been perfectly all right, for in that vision the heavens became translucent and the dove floated twenty or so feet above my head. It made no motion with its wings, but simply floated on crystal clear water with me submerged twenty feet below. So when the dove appeared to descend, it didn’t come through water; instead I must have emerged, as told in the story: “When Jesus came out of the water the dove descended upon him.” The way this story is told, people think of earthly water; but in the vision the water was crystal clear, so translucent I could not tell if it was liquid or not. Do you know that we are actually living at the bottom of an ocean of air? In the spiritual sense we are in the flood, and when the dove appears he floats until the individual emerges. Then the dove takes your finger and smothers the individual with kisses."

The flood is the immersion in the world, in the body. "We are in the flood" he says.

"Well, facts have overflowed the world like the flood. Man actually is “drowned” with facts, victimized by facts. It is in the Imagination that everything lives, and not in its actuality, not in the fact. Unless Imagination penetrates the facts, the deluge remains a deluge. We are now in the deluge. This is the flood!"

Right so here he says that the conditioning of the world is the great flood. The nervous system responds to the flood.

"bread into the substance of fairy. I sort of like that,” he said. “But when I listen to you I hold the chair and I put my feet right firmly on the ground to feel the reality and the profundity of things. You aren’t going to take me away with you. You are going to leave me right here where things are solidly real, so I feel the place under my foot and I feel the things next to my hands. I hold on tightly while you weave your story concerning moving off in one’s imagination.” He would not penetrate the facts. So, when did he get out? When the other millions got out. So he remained with his facts for the next three years! I got out in March of 1943; he came home to New York City in 1946, demobilized as the other millions and millions of boys were. He could not let go [of] the facts. This is the flood . . there is no other flood . . this is the flood. We are “drowned” with facts, victimized by them."

We are drowned by facts he says. Victimized by them, which is correct. When you see the perpetrators for what they are then you're no longer the victim of anything.

9/12/25

Last day of a free Aussie internet. Tomorrow Albo's big plan goes into action and we're all going to need to present ID to play around online, at least on some platforms.

So it's true. At least it would seem that way. Your overall thematic composition determines your appearance. More yang means more angle. Kidney yang. Kidney yang = TEST. Kidney yang is the core substance of vitality next, unless we're talking about Jing. Basically, having more of that thematic composition with very very potent kidney yang with balanced yin = unstoppable force and an electrifying gaze for the polarity when they get a good gaze on you. That's pretty much how this works. How do we get into that place? You expand into that on ALL levels. I do believe age reversal SHOULD be possible this way. Considering how I thought I went hard before I realize that I'm not even close to my potential. I've more than maxxed my intelligence stat to the moon and absolutely shred anyone who dares to compete with me on that level. Does that reflect from the gaze though? No. Therefore I have not integrated the archetypal nature of yang current to my capacity. The way I see it is this. Unless your field oozes activating current, yang, and people actually feel that and that you stick out like a sore thumb in a room full of weak mortal men, then you're really just another one of the rest. Your vitality needs to be FELT. It's not to compare or elicit reactions for stimulation, but that this is THE NATURAL STATE OF BEING OF AN IMMORTAL. It just is. Anyone who's not there is in cope land playing the games with mortals who cannot break the expectations and conditions of this Juu run world who want to keep you under their thumb. You can mercilessly tear off the heads of that trash and smile while you do it, there doesn't need to be intensity for such things really. The more we view things this way the more involvement becomes effortless really.

I also find myself now catching this "intensity" sensation that washes over me whenever I feel that "let's go" type of current arise. I feel it and then I immediately drop that. My experience is that while this can be functional it mostly causes more liver qi stagnation by sitting in needless agitation stemming from comparison that I thought "intensity" would bring out of me. The point is that the same result doesn't require that intensity sensation that has an undercurrent of agitation. You can smile and do the work too. We're here to have coherent shen, not to be machines. That's honestly one thing I picked up from NG the most, with the whole "isn't it wonderful" thing, where things that don't need to be seen as serious have importance dropped. Living this way and viewing everything as less important I believe plays a key role in actually integrating that nature of viewing reality more as God.

All of that work has taught me more and more about how to apply coaching more, and why being raw with people is truly the only way to get results. All the people who get results with this work are living an expanding life, they're not using LOA as a cope method for the fact that they feel like trash and can't accept it. It's just the fact. The more I study NG too the more I recognize that a vast majority of his doctrine can be summed up by simply one word. "Charge". It all comes down to that. All of his work is to move current, charge. It doesn't replace moving current in other ways that work the same mechanism though, and various examples of that can be proven in his case studies too. You don't need to lie down and deliberately imagine anything consciously to make your life better or manifest specific things. I also cannot stand the idea that unless it's a specific thing that happens then it's not manifesting. How insanely illiterate.

I also want to make this clear. Your parents set you up to fail and then make fun of you when you fail. They did. They consciously did it, I know that because of their responses to such effects they have on us. They basically deny all responsibility. They observe the changes and yet don't do anything about it. They want to mold you into their good little slave to be their projection toy basically. They need to get stuffed and you need to eradicate them from your life. They're absolutely trash and cannot help you in any way. THEY ARE THE CAUSE OF YOUR SUFFERING. I don't care what NG says, the fact is that how you feel and the conditions you face came FROM THEM, even IF they ARE reflections of your consciousness, it still happened and that's the pathway cascades you're operating from and seeing that for what it is is necessary to cultivate the kidney yang that's needed to actually develop fully. My staying in their box really was what screwed me over the most, especially to my mum, who knew what she was doing and didn't have my best interests in mind, despite what I would've thought. ALL women in this world, despite what anyone says to the contrary, are DESIGNED to leech our vitality as men, the carriers of that capacity. They NEED it, else they implode. Literally. It's that we need relaxation as carriers of the yang, they need activation as carriers of the yin, but they're literally only here to take our vitality and transform it into either parasitism, or productivity in healthy functional ways by regulating the men properly. Thing is almost all of them will be living in parasitic mode because they're conditioned by the Juize media trash that puts them on the pedestal and destroys their ability to properly transform masculine yang current in functional ways. Women should see US as the "attractive" ones, NATURALLY. We should be the ones sending out sparks, not them to us. We decide who we pick, and not just taking pickings for pickings sake. Screw all the trash out there that thinks otherwise. Nothing can be proven to the contrast when you're metaphysically literate.

We're here to carry the activating current of growth and expansion and drive that through our involvement in the world. Without that then these women don't have carriers of that current to regular functionally and thus become parasitic. It's both ends, which is why we have to give the Juize who engineered this a round of applauds. Congratulations. You've ruined an entire generation of humans who could've built a magnificent world. Either way, getting real with all the sources that keep you small and keep that activating current stifled need to be eradicated and eternally banished from your sacred space in your field geometry. Screw all of that trash you're going to leave it in the dust and move on.

So much of this work is restoring who you really are. So much of this work is simply deconditioning from the expectations to stay small and in the box where we can be easily controlled and projected on. If you're God in capacity, and want to own more of your capacity then breaking that limit is necessary which means owning more of your innate nature and eradicating any semblance of influence by involving yourself in the things that the conditions say you shouldn't and owning it fully. This goes way beyond what NG taught. We must die to the old self fully and uncompromisingly. That is in fact the only way to become as one with God. You have to become obsessed with the transformation. Think about who you are in that vision every day and act through meaningful implied involvement to get those state streaks going strong. Get all the way into it and go all the way. The pain sucks in the start but you will transform. The vision of yourself will be born no matter what, because that's the law. Where there's a desire, there's a way that will open up. I want you to get obsessed with killing who you are, not just integrating who you are now into that form, but totally dying to who you were before. TOTALLY TRANSFORMED AND UNRECOGNISABLE. The more radical and spontaneous the change the more brutal the transformation will be. Really what you're doing is killing your parents. That's who you're killing, and their trash that they infused into you by failing miserably. The result, even if all the action is just "placebo", will come if you fully dedicate yourself to going all the way and ERADICATE ANY SEMBLANCE of who you were. THAT is the most painful thing imaginable, the death of the comfort of compromise and pseudo satisfaction. Eradicate that trash by cutting through every condition and owning the vision you have for your life. Do what I did and imagine yourself standing before the people who screwed up your life and show them who you are and not care about how they feel or how anyone feels. It will feel VERY uncomfortable but it will be the way you "grow up" and be who you really always were designed to be. That's what we need to do.

Modern LOA interpretation is HARDCOPE. The most insane hard cope you could ever imagine. Imagining while still being the same person. NG tells us to build habits of thought, and if your new habits of thought represent your vision being made true here and now it will DRIVE YOU to WANT to involve. You won't WANT to sit around and do nothing because the involvement WILL BE SATISFYING BECAUSE IT MEANS YOU'RE TRANSFORMING FOR REAL RIGHT NOW. Get all that insane cope trash out of here that all you need to do is imagine and "not lift a finger". Screw that trash.

None of this is about comparisons to anything except the innate natural striving that moves through us that transforms us. That is ALL we are comparing to. NOTHING else.

There's a certain "feel" to this that you can live from.

So from what I've gathered from studying Goddard more is that periodic charge mediation is how persistence is applied, next to revising on the spot with conditions showing up to ruin your intuitive impulse. We have revision as the only method NG would preach if he could. Revision is pathway work. It seems that 90% of the threads are tied up well.

10/12/25

So here it is. Prolactin causes lack of drive. Plain and simple. Avoid prolactin to expand consistently and WANT to expand. That doesn't mean you're not relaxed, but that you're comfortable with the expansion.

Most zoom guys have been put down so hard and shamed and railed against for simply trying to expand. The doctrine is absorb and transform our energy into their own benefits that the conditioning has said is right for them. Nobody is there to pull them into line correctly, no ACTUAL masculine figure who knows how boundaries and real self respect works. Like the masculine figure who is doing their thing simply wouldn't even partake in the vitality absorption tactics that are at play. Most guys have been sucked try and there's nothing left but a soulless lifeless husk that wants to check out and live in pseudo satisfaction since they at least feel SOMETHING "positive". In reality it's them denying how they feel which is the problem, because in truth, they've got so must hatred for these life sucking women out there who are conditioned. Over 60% of them are heavily conditioned I'd argue. over 80% of them are conditioned to some degree, and the rest of the top 10-20% are probably already taken and enjoying life with someone who's financially stable.

Does this matter? Well it's a collective reality that cannot change because it's part of the script that God plays out AS us. Right? So this is suppose to happen, through all the means that it is, and that the time we're in is just a period that is highly contracted and is forcing transformation. It's making men, and some small fraction of women too, look at themselves honestly and be real with how they feel. Being uncensored in this world is the way to win. Since satisfaction cannot be attained through peer support on the broad level then the only other way to gain satisfaction is to simply be real and not compromise and allow yourself to ENJOY being rejected because it's the fact. You don't sucker up to the expectations of others, and you'll also know when to withdraw even playing into the vitality absorption traps that are laid and THAT actually depletes the women who tried to use you as a battery for her self affirmation. So it's change through men getting real with themselves, and forcing women to take a look at their meaningless self affirmation that's got the support and approval of Juize who peddle such narratives. Light natives get steamrolled while the aliens get the magic treatment.

I've spoken to people who are successful, who own multiple properties, supercars, own multiple businesses, have hot dates, all the things a man would think he wants in life, and their argument is that most men are simply too weak to get up and get real. I can agree, for real. Work is necessary, it always was and always will be, though he didn't start from scratch completely like we do, living in near poverty for years and trying to get ahead without options. It's necessary to change how you approach the game really, you move outside the bounds of how you play it. Zooms are for the most part fried, and all that cope that keeps the pseudo satisfaction cycles going isn't going to help at all. Getting real is the first step to anything meaningful, because you're recognizing natural striving for once. Then action on that in meaningful satisfying ways leads to functional self affirmation that comes from the expansion of the innate currents. There's no need for external validation, and because you can see it's all a trap, you simply distance yourself from that game and allow those who can see you for who you are to show up for you and be willing to put in the time because you're worth it to them. Chasing anyone in this world is just dumb really. I spoke to a 21 year old girl who lives in SA (South Australia) and makes over $300 an hour doing literally nothing. She's in child psychiatry and makes more money than basically any guy I know her age who has a job. She's not even qualified yet but still gets jobs without real experience. She literally told me she does nothing useful and encouraged me to get into it as well since it's so profitable. Little does she know I make more than her some weeks. Now up north in WA there's many farmers I know who are struggling to make ANY profit on product sold and they put in blood sweat and tears. This is what I mean. The power balance is being totally ruined. The jobs men do best are either not available for us generally or don't pay enough to be worth even trying and so everyone goes online to make cash which is what almost all zooms I know are doing now because it's way more reliable than trying to land a high paying Job. I got paid $120 an hour as a remedial massage therapist, but the work that's put in is significantly higher than what many other jobs provide in pay for doing literally nothing. So that's why the zooms be checking out now and not even playing the game to avoid burning out, but that's still cope because their vitality goes through the floor unless they're actively expanding in other meaningful ways. If you're living in cope pseudo satisfaction and not making ANY meaningful progress in expansion then you're going to ruin yourself hardcore.

Either way the point of this discussion is that the trends exist and are alarming. None of us personally are responsible for that situation, since it's part of the play. As pressure builds we expand willingly to avoid the pressure. The booms who didn't feel the same degree of pressure since social availability for men was affirmed and supported, then it's a totally different comparison. The support structures are dead, and that's why back in the regime that the infamous painter ran when he got in power was so supportive of the zoom like generation and they were given meaning and purpose. That's totally dead now. Every faction is against you, and if you're being abused on all fronts, then the only reasonable response is to call out the trash and rise above it to step on its toes and be willing to be seen as bad by the few who are dumb enough to drink the boomer cool aid. When women see the power dynamic shift they'll tow the line, at least more so, since they're unable to hold any support structure since they cannot build any themselves. They rely on the institutions building their support with Juu money. Our power goes way beyond that. We have an infinite wellspring of vitality available so long as we channel that current. That's why they cannot win no matter how much cash they print or how many 10's they condition into playing the games with us and put us down. By us being real we act as a threat to the system silently as we're not conforming but also acting as functional units in the collective to show other guys that you don't have to tolerate the trash and that rejection from these conditioned women is only validation for you. That's how it should be seen these days. If you're actually expanding and being real and they don't like it then more power to you, since you're only going to find the power balance shifting further over time in your favor as things get worse. Seeking validation from women is the WORST thing for zoom guys to do. LITERALLY THE WORST THING. You want their REJECTION, and the women who are real will come to you since they will see you. That 10% will see you. You SHOULD check out of the system and call out the trash and actively put the conditioning back on who propagate it and make it known to them and enjoy every second of the rejection. You don't have to conform to any of that expectation, and it's a natural response to the state crushing everything you stand for. You've been having the Juize boots on your neck your whole life, so what do they expect will happen? If the state and everyone the state supports (which is pretty much everyone except you light zoomer guy) then you have every right to respond with rejection towards their playbook and call out the trash for what it is, in a meaningful way. Reject their rejection. Totally disconnect from feeding the vampire's. Laugh at their attempts to suck the light out of you and make fun of their sucky lives. Be real and be satisfied.

How do you manifest who you want? You be yourself without compromise. Individualize and create your own path in life that's totally unique for your vision. Own it. Totally disconnect from the conditioned game they want you to play, because it's there to abuse you and you're not going to take that being used and abused status and instead put it back on them and rob them of the opportunity to feed their sick delusions. That's all. The LOA NG stuff will happen naturally through this movement of self love and self acceptance. Totally die to the person who wants to play in the vitality sucking game and forge the path towards true meaningful lasting satisfaction that's between you and whoever comes your way along that journey who's going to be there for you. Trust intuitive impulse and be fearless. No compromise.

All functional social structures rely on access to meaningful romantic relationships, even if for the most part they're just means of making our inner conflicts known, but it's still a more functional means of processing such. Without that access then culture fries and so do the brains of the people involved in that. You're not the issue, they are. This is done TO you, it's a collective reality. You cannot ignore that, and NG himself spoke endlessly against the "lying politicians" and all that even in his day. It's there, he talked about businesses turning us into slaves. He said that. I don't have the quotes on hand but he did have political opinions that are in line with seeing the state as an issue. He wasn't entirely someone with common sense takes and supported some degeneracy in other ways but my point stands that even NG himself bought into the stories about the social structure being exploitative, back in the 60's. Just think what he'd say now.

So how does the shift in seeing reality more from the whole "Christ consciousness" perspective play into all this? Well, you see the reality of things as part of the script of God playing out as expected and flow with the currents that move you. That's all. That's literally it. That's how NG saw it really. He saw everyone as himself, as God, as extensions of his capacity to be influenced through his movements on an inward level, though obviously he failed to move the collective reality in any meaningful way despite talking about changing the whole basis. He's said this, not to focus on specific people but the whole system that they are integrated within. That's his view and there's quotes to support that I don't have on hand because there's so many of them. My point here about this is that to change the collective is a futile attempt to fight against the nature of the predetermined script itself. Ng did say there are predetermined outcomes, such as your death. He literally says that your life from beginning to end happens in a specific timing within the history of the world and that your death will happen in a way that is necessary for "the work yet to be done in him". I still don't fully agree but I can see the basis of that point.

Also please do keep this in mind. Most of us are caught up in the paradigm of needing to recreate abuse traumas to make sense of how we feel. I've given you the shortcut which is getting real with how you feel and empowering yourself accordingly to reject such abuse as pathetic acts of projection, though most women who reject you for not conforming to the social normalcy are in themselves just living out their own need to feel the conditioning as well. The state becomes the abusive parents and any of these vampires who say they want the 666 are just playing the game they've been conditioned to want. It seems so many in the blackpill space still don't grasp the core foundation that women also have psychological tendencies towards degeneracy as well and it's not just biochemistry at play. There's levels that in many cases can drive attraction to forms that would be "sub 5" in many cases simply because that person simulates their unconscious unresolved conflicts to be played out and they get off on the pleasure of trying to resolve their traumatic trash instead of getting real with how they feel and rejecting someone who treats them like that. It's insane. I can't stand it to be honest. They're right when it comes to healthy minded women who aren't warped, but that's literally less than 0.01% of them if you ask me, within the 8-10 range. They don't exist basically. You're heavily coping in blackpill thinking that just because you bag a 10 that you'll end up with a healthy loving relationship. That's insane cope man it's coming from people who obviously haven't spent more than a few months with someone tops. There are basically zero psychologically healthy people period, let alone 10s that will want YOU and you also want them the same way.

This makes me wonder still, about treatment from them, there needs to be sufficient radiance. Real confidence and "flow" without conflict comes along side vitality. They're one in the same thing, as I've always said really. Vitality and the currents determine it all, including the NG LLA stuff, since that's working the same mechanisms. Now once again, all my experience and experiments tell me that attraction and thirst requires virility. PERIOD END OF STORY. I do not see ANY evidence of freaks getting 8+'s anywhere in LOA. Not a single one. I see no evidence of it at all which once again only demonstrates to me that the NG LOA stuff isn't above everything else as a so called law but that it's functional as a component at play within the rest of the aspects that also matter. This is something NG said, that we're going to die on a fixed timeline and we are powerless to stop it or even accelerate it. So if this is what he taught and he explicitly said the bible teaches then it only proves irrefutably that solipsism isn't the fact and that manifesting other people to show up for you depends almost entirely on your thematic composition as well to trigger thirst in them. I've always said this, that thirst comes from radiance. If you have no radiance then there's no thirst for what's not there. Do you get me? Without virility then SP manifesting is impossible because the law IS THEMATIC IN NATURE. Always has always will be. It's alchemical. So I will argue that anyone pushing that you can have anyone IN ANY STATE (of self respect/function as a highly verile guy) is there to sell you cope trash and keep you coming back for more to line their pockets. With out being who they want then they won't want you, just like you don't want someone else, and we know that projection onto others often backfires, because it's your dysfunction spilling out into the lives of others. Nobody wants that, unless they're dysfunctional themselves. It then clearly proves that manifesting SP is more than just imaginal acts at night, and NG said you don't even want a specific person but you want to be happily married. I still don't fully agree with this, not from the SP perspective but the motivation more or less.

The thing to consider with all of this is that without a powerful supply of activating current then you will never be able to make who you want thirst. You can't. It's literally impossible because there's always a natural cause. ALWAYS. If the way they thirst is through means other than pure biology then that's going to be how it'll manifest, but that will still be an overlay over the raw primordial yang current they really want. Every woman ever to exist wants your yang, just as you want to be absorbed in her yin. Right? Everyone dreams of their polarity, and the psychology of that is the thematic current dynamics. This is law. The real law. So the real law has and will always be thematic supply/demand. If it's true on one level it's true on all other levels. This is why the clients I know who get SPs get them through working in other ways as well, involvement that's meaningful matters. I screwed up so much of my life by lacking meaningful involvement and being a "good boy" for my parents and such since I didn't want to get rejected but that very submissive dynamic was a manifestation of my lack of virile yang that women CRAVE LIKE THE SUN. That's the thing that will morph your face and make seeming impossible changes happen, because the hormones are manifestations of the innate currents. The genes that activate do so through thematic sequencing of the Jing when capacities of current are reached and overflow happens. Anyone who didn't develop properly is deficient in Jing because they either were born lacking it or they artificially depleted it early on through deep heavy compromise where they couldn't manifest the traits of expansion. They couldn't BECOME activating yang current. They were weak and feeble and thus they cannot make the girls they want thirst. THEY CANNOT IT'S IMPOSSIBLE, primordially speaking that is. That's what I wrote about before and got cope from saying it by fools who want to stay small. When you look at the psychology of all of this it's about expansion, willing participation in using available activating current to cause a thematic pathway cascade to manifest more of that current through your life in all corresponding ways that would be possible for you. That cultivation is necessary.

The core of this is even from an NG perspective about seeing yourself beyond circumstances. Seeing yourself as God is the most uncompromising view to have. You don't become a doormat or anything and accept others standing on you, you're solid with who you allow to interact with your vitality. So manifesting has and will always be about moving currents of the meridian systems which manifest different mechanisms of action. It's sad to say but upwards of 40% of zooms cannot ever elicit thirst in who they would like to be with. They cannot because of Juize. It was never like this in the past when men grew up without depletion as the foundation and the constant psychological attacks keeping them small and weak. We're told that it's psychological first, then biological. The data I've been through would suggest this is correct, but not in the way you'd think. The psychology is responsible for the alteration of the biology. The biology adapts to the psychology. Always. This is an obvious law. So the psychological work is making habit of normalizing a different pathway cascade that will branch out into the implication of those themes of experience being available, including biologically. I've always been very yang in nature really, very expanding, but my biology never fully reflected that. I was able to compete in sports to a top percentile despite being less physically capable and often smaller then them. I just had "speed" and "agility" as my strength, which is a solid yang trait of dynamism. I find that whenever I move my body in those ways and express myself that way I psychologically feel massively confident and often get gazes from cuties. It's not something I try it just happens when I feel that pressure drive me to express that current. This is a postulate I've contemplated on lately and that is that the biology that's available for you that you feel the pressure to involve in action with, that will have an "mirror" effect on your psychology as those pathways fire from the biology involving in those pathways. The psychology will mirror the physical level affinity begin expressed. This I believe is a function that's been barely explored and could have deep implications as to how to use implied involvement even more effectively.

So I propose more or less that as always trusting intuitive impulse to move you will manifest the best for you. Also always remember that you're here to kill (not physically) your parents and the system that raised you to be a docile good little kid in this world who's going to bend over and take the beating because you have no power in yourself to say no screw that I'm going to do what I want and you turn it back onto them for abusing you. That's how we need to act here. This is a necessary part of the transformation for many people I work with who don't want to admit it at the start but later on will feel that way when they really feel the pressure and get real with how they feel and why they are the way they are. Those pathway cascades are real and they have roots in parental abuse very commonly. That's what you're in LOA for, to try and resolve that stuff but it takes more than just imagining them being positive. In many cases, if you don't have implied involvement as a foundation that's meaningful then you're going to lack deeply on the impact side of things when it comes to action which will drive your psychology towards real expansion. Your psychology will get to a point where that feeling of fury or whatever will turn into an acceptance since you've now mastered the implications of their impacts no longer being true for you. You've deconditioned and lived your truth. From here, I believe, then the deeper impacts of the psychological "rubbing off" of your expansion can have the effect you're looking for in changing them as NG says. Do keep in mind though, I do not know anybody personally who's demonstrated this.

So back to the core. To get the girl to actually thirst, you need to embody those currents and become them. This is by the way why physical training is ALWAYS required. The dynamics here matter. Nobody can sit around and do nothing and develop a rock solid figure. NOBODY ON EARTH CAN DO THAT. NOT ONE PERSON EVER. If they have then show me documented data showing that to be the case that's verifiable. Manifesting is a dynamic of thematic supply/demand and that will integrate within your capacity based on how expanded you are relative to the awareness of God. Seeing things as they are is almost always a necessary first step to getting there, as we know.

When NG says "don't lift a finger to make it happen", it's obviously contextual here. This CANNOT apply to things such as developing a world champion tier figure. Nobody on that level has that without "working" for it. Thing is that those people will WANT to involve, it will be a natural expression of those currents into natural striving. Since they're comfortable the current that's established by connection from the "seed"/state that NG talks about, then they will naturally involve without "lifting a finger" since only God acts. That's how I interpret this, because it cannot work that way. NG has already said that there's predetermined outcomes in our lives. He said there's no destiny though in other lectures, yet in "the sower" he said there is by explicitly saying the bible teaches predetermined periods of life and death in this iteration as well as an inescapable pathway towards spiritual expansion and individuation. He said this is what the bible teaches, therefore there's functions beyond our corporeal being that's pulling the strings and he personifies the subconscious mind in many cases as well as God. He said we're like "braincells" in the mind of God all comprising his body. Yeah, I can see that, the higher genius that we all have emanates who you and I am in this iteration until the work is complete; NG once again refers to this "for the work yet to be done in him" many many times. Dozens of times I can quote. It's important, and yet proves determinism is in his work, though on a spiritual expansion basis and not so much exact events outside of things such as entry and exit from life here. The alchemist has said before that the higher genius can in fact force control over your body and mind and literally pull you like a puppet without you having any power to stop it, and thus if the higher genius wants to, you could be killed instantly. That's not going to happen unless it's ready to happen though, according to NG. He explicitly said this is what the bible teaches so there's zero refutation. Therefore, if he said there's no destiny, he's either contradicting himself or there's more to his doctrine than we think. It seems our lives here, for the most part, are based on our free will decision to involve in what we want or not, be that attaining money or whatever else. The law is that our thematic supply/demand process manifests what we want.

NG in various lectures spoke about destiny in different contexts. I need to do a deeper study on this too. The study is endless. Either way, it seems he taught that who you "feel" yourself to be (thematically) will BECOME your destiny. The pathway cascades unfold INTO experiences that correspond. This can make sense absolutely. I can get on board with that.

"Now, if this very night you dare to assume that this immortal brother is your own wonderful human Imagination and he is Jesus Christ, you know what you are doing? See, character becomes destiny. The moment you dare to assume that your own wonderful human Imagination is Jesus Christ you adopt that character. Well, your destiny is automatic then, for you know his destiny—straight to the Father, one with the Father. You aren’t going to avoid the problems of life, no, that’s what this world is about. You aren’t going to avoid anything, but you’ll pass through them because you know the end. The end is resurrection; the end is one with God. But who is one with God?—Jesus Christ. So you must assume that I am he, as you are told in the 46th Psalm, “Be still and know that I am God” (verse 10). If you are afraid to do it, embarrassed to do it, alright, I can’t force you to do it, but the day will come you’ll have to do it. You’ll be moved from place to place in this world, through the gate of death, restored to life, and through other experiences until finally you come to the state that you dare to claim “I am he.” When you claim it, that’s your character. Whatever you claim that you are that’s your character and character invariably becomes your destiny. The destiny of Jesus Christ is God."

It's God taking form THROUGH the thematic currents moving through the pathway cascade. TCM maps these pathways very very intricately. So God becomes that pathway cascade and your character moves accordingly and the biology will adapt as we all experience. Who you're expressing yourself to be on a thematic current level determines how hard you'll juice up the romantic interests you have too. It's obvious and clear how this all works then. Biological changes happen through the meridian systems by assuming the thematic currents that imply the change on the psychological level that reflect in the biology. The biology MUST reflect the inner thematic currents to the degree that you "assume" them to be so. That's the ONLY thing that manifests, that we can prove to be so. We can pretty clearly prove this to be the case in all scenarios, and it would connect with that NG said about predetermined reality that we experience such as death and such,

This is a pretty clear insight as to the functional mechanics of all of this work. There's no point in staying in the LOA NG box where everything is seen as mind when mind is functionally these currents that IS the subconscious mind itself. That body, IS the aetheric body. They are one in the same thing. So, ANY biological shift IS possible. NG has talked about regrowing limbs, though I've only seen someone regrow toes and a nose from cancer and other factors. That's 100% possible, especially through the somatids, bions, microzym and such vesicles that literally form "chains" and link into each other following what I believe the meridians would "unfold" into as flesh and bone when currents are available to manifest that biologically. This makes complete sense and answers all the questions. This is something I figured out way back when I was just 19. This isn't new at all for me I've been through a ton of data on that since then. Too bad my currents were still weak. Damn it. So age reversal means fully owning your innate capacity and integrating all of these aspects completely as to literally reverse aging. The Jing unfolds correctly and without being depleted through living on postnatal Jing supply from food and such.

None of the ignorant coach morons in this LOA space even have a single clue about any of this stuff. They're so insanely illiterate. Is that a negative judgement? Well in that case NG is judging the politicians by calling them liars.

"he plays the part, for politicians are perpetual liars, making promises they cannot keep."

"I urge you to assume that you are important. That you are wanted. That you are contributing to the world; for as you do, you move to a higher level of yourself. The politician urges you to vote for him, claiming that if you do he will take care of you. He knows he is lying, but the average person, conditioned as he is, accepts these words and perpetuates the state. There is no prison strong enough to keep you behind bars when you know this principle."

"But unless man is told that, and if politicians will not tell people that, but tell them, “I’ll take care of you. Vote for me,” they know that they can’t really take care of them, they know that, they know they’re lying. But the average person conditioned as he is, he will accept these gratuities, and you can’t continue it."

"When the politicians promise change, don’t argue; smile as you have through the centuries, knowing they aren’t going to change anything."

"While here, you must pay the price of living in the world of Caesar. You may criticize our politicians and protest any raise in taxes, but you will continue to be taxed. All you have to do is learn the art of prayer and make more money."

"Every day politicians are trying to change the world. We have many who claim to be our saviors, yet each . . like the Hitlers and the Stalins of the world . . have clay feet. Still, people will believe in them and you can’t stop them, because they are dreaming. Being all imagination, you can’t stop man from imagining, and imagining creates reality."

I rest my case. NG clearly casted the same "negative" light on them and railed against other things in this world in other lectures, saying that it's "difficult to make a living in this world" under the context of when you die you'll struggle the same as you do here. That's what he's said many times. I could quote but I don't want to eat up notebook space for that when the quotes are on the website in the NG quotes page now. Every lecture and word he said is in there for free for you to read. So you can't go blasting me for saying that certain things are the way they are without also blasting the golden cow of NG who did the same repeatedly as I proved. Casting judgement as it's seeming from this level isn't the point. You see if changing the world was as simple as assuming politicians are honest and true to their word as NG would seem to do for everyone else, then why didn't he do that and why did he not see them as "lovely" and "wonderful" as he always says? Why not? Why make the exception? Well he said they play the part. Does that mean they're in a lower state of being simply being moved by an unseen force that's using them as the people who manifest the dysfunction in the world? Well that would seem to be the case at face value. He literally says they play the part of perpetual liars. Therefore we can assume that certain functions in this world are designed this way. The collective level world. He also said that the world and the conditioning is the flood, as I went over in a prior entry. The great flood is the environmental condition by which we're all swimming in until we exit the environment from the immortality work.

"Now, there will be false prophets in the world who will appropriate that garment . . not appropriate it, but will tell you. So, you are warned in Scripture to test every spirit, whether it be of God, for you are told in the 11th chapter of Second Corinthians that Satan will claim he is the Angel of Light. You are told in the 8th chapter of John that he is “a liar and the father of lies”; and he will come through sensitive souls and distort them, try to disillusion them, try to get them to falter along the way by claiming he is that which has been revealed otherwise of another. You will see it in Scripture, and so don’t for one moment think it’s not all within us.

The “devil” is not another. It is all within us . . the doubter. He causes man to doubt. He is the liar in man. He cannot believe the truth when he hears it; and if the ear is open as it should be in all of us, he comes through; but you are told, “Test him.” Ask him a simple question: “Now you’ve told me that you are this light, and not the one of whom you heard. Well now, tell me a simple thing: What will I do tomorrow?” Ask him . . he knows so much! Ask him the simple little question! “Tell me now: he that you’ve just denied that it’s his garment, what will he be doing, say, next Friday?” Not standing on the platform, for that I know, and therefore you will know it, too. But, “What will he be doing, say, on Thursday?” Give him that. Test the Spirit, whether he be from God. If they can’t answer how, well then, they are liars and the father of lies, as told us in the 8th chapter of John. So, in the 11th chapter of Second Corinthians he is declared the liar, for he claims that he is the Angel of Light; and he is not light, he is darkness. He is all “death.” He is all doubting. He is the liar. So, test everyone who comes inwardly, either in your dream, your vision, or when you are really beginning to awaken and the voice is being heard by you from within."

So he's saying that the devil is within us, which when you view what he said as everyone is you pushed out meaning that you're God and everyone is a part of God, then obviously that works. but functionally it's not really like that for everyone.

11/12/25

"So, here, today when you return read the whole chapter. It’s beautiful. But I started with the 27th verse, “And God made man in his own image, in the image of God made He him. Male and female made He them.” Then comes what is to be done. Then comes the promise if you do it. Then comes the judgment, “It is good and very good.” So you start knowing that you are the earth on which you now start to labor. If you do it, you shall be fruitful, and you will multiply, and you actually replenish this world, though it seemingly is barren you replenish it, if you subdue it. And the earth is self to be subdued, not by beating self as some people have misunderstood, not by isolating the self in some little secluded spot, not by running away from life, but in the midst of life is the opportunity to become meek: to take the violence that is man, it is individual man, and then bring it into the state of the meek, to transcend the violence by not fighting against conditions; know that conditions can only reflect what is within the one who observes that condition. So don’t rage against it; leave it just as it is. If conditions remain the same, that is a sure, sure sign that you have not been faithful to righteousness.

Had you been faithful to the consciousness of already being the man you want to be, conditions would have to change in harmony with that righteousness. So don’t rage against it; leave it as it is, and start today to take this wonderful earth, which is the foot stool of the Lord, which really is the mind of man, and start really to work upon it. Then you will not turn from left to right; you will keep the narrow path. You will go out knowing you can do it."

So I've been once again contemplating on the connection between real confidence and vitality and the juice, you know. So it's pretty clear that they all go hand in hand. Vital currents unfold as how you respond to the world. This whole NG stuff is just so insanely surface level it's crazy. That all comes as a result of this, not the other way around. Yeah, the inner level DOES drive everything else, but that's not going to do it by thinking in a vacuum. That's useless trash advice. "Don't lift a finger to make it happen". This is all about vitality matching. ALL about it. Without that then you don't get gazes, period. You cannot make up for that with psychological games, at least not fully. Vitality matching and exceeding is basically being a battery for activating current and having that spill over into how your biology manifests your inner level. The inner level spills out onto the exterior and cannot be faked. Unshakable confidence, ALWAYS comes from involvement that's meaningful. I do not care what anybody says that's an irrefutable fact and I've been through way too much data that tears to shreds this idea that it's all mental. I've done logging of how I feel about different things over the years on the regular, and especially lately, and it's VERY CLEAR that physically involving myself in the life I want automatically moves my mental states to be far more satisfied at baseline. Without that then you're done. It's actually over. You NEED to get real with how you feel and involve meaningfully. Without that then expect nothing of benefit to happen. 99% of people in LOA are looking for breadcrumbs in the world to validate such a weak feeble sense of self, signs make them have a racing heart, like it did with me because ANY positive movement was stimulating to an excessive degree since there was such a deep lack of satisfaction. I also am seriously critical of systems like HD for not factoring this in as well, which obviously matters. It's all here in RS, that's why I've spent years expanding this year after year until everything is answered.

Vitality cultivation and moving that current through meaningful implied involvement makes your mental state produce more of its kind. I cannot see proof of anyone in this world who went from a 1 to a 10 without that. Nobody. Not one person. I see nothing but weak trash peddling mentalism who haven't got a deep drive to transform their vitality. The currents make all of this work, that's God. Those who contain more God manifest more satisfying experiences. Spiritually expanded people must contain more God by default since that capacity for awareness necessitates immortality to be available. I do not believe that you can complete the work and die. The body is the alchemy lab, it is the vessel which houses God. The vessel is transformed in the process to handle that amount of current, which is what my qigong master always told me. He'd say you need to prepare the meridians for handling more power. The reality is that being a real juicer requires you to contain more of God and the only way to do that is to be real and follow natural striving. That is your only source of current that's satisfying. Everything else is compromise to meet the expectations of others and that's regression, not expansion. Real expansion requires us to go all the way and that's clearly observed in physically pushing limits and driving biological adaptation. This mechanism as I've discussed in earlier pages. Having power and vitality means you manifest whatever you want since the literal thematic supply/demand is available to metaphysically facilitate that. EVEN IF this is all just mental, then this function still applies anyway from the top down. There's really no way to avoid that, out of all the years of experimenting with this stuff it's clear that meaningful involvement always preceded big changes in my life, or feeling immense pressure and cutting through conditions inwardly that then opened up an outer level response.

The phenomena of manifesting specific things, and people, even while you seem to be lower vitality at baseline, is very real. The thing is that it most often comes out of willing expansion of some form, which has been my experience. It doesn't come from feeling positive. Persistence in feeling like you're the person you want to be will almost always necessitate involvement of some form with that in the world to lead state streaks which autosuggest that state at baseline. Therefore through repeated involvement you build habit and that habit draws adaptation from the biology to drive comfort in being that person you envisioned yourself to be inwardly. The mechanism is obvious but the people who say this can be bypassed obviously can't prove anything.

It starts with obviously developing properly, but our parental figures and environmental trash ruins that. How can this all be inner level lack in a vacuum on the NG LOA side of things if there's literally upwards of 60% of zooms wanting to ropemax these days because of their weakness? It's obviously designed this way, as I've gone over, but it also means that they're doing NOTHING useful to expand. These people cannot see themselves in their ideal consistently and that requires them to break the conditioning of the family unit that want them to stay small. Most people do not agree or like what I said but it's the fact. The family unit and the world around us wants us to be small and stuck in the box. Screw that. The ones who manifest the expression of verlie activating current embody that fully and remove the influence of those systems from their decision making. That's what happens. The ones who fully decondition retain their vitality. All those parts of you that you left behind to keep others happy are sucking the Jing out of you. Those people need to be cut out and you need to reclaim that capacity. I don't care what NG says about seeing everybody in a higher state, for most zooms that's necessary to start with this whole thing. Reclaiming true independence for real, because a vast majority of us have next to none, especially financially speaking which is also a very important factor because without recourses you're worth nothing more than your at face value stimulating ability. Without those sparks there's nothing else. The sparks are necessary obviously but sparks without somewhere to stay and call home is just sparks flying around in the endless void. If you produce sparks then it's pretty obvious that you'd likely get opportunities to attain such wealth. Posting online will make bank ad money through the screen. Welcome to modern women making more money online for doing nothing just by posting themselves for the copium addicts who live in their bedrooms affirming all day imagining being with that person and nothing happens and they're still massively unsatisfied. There's no true absorption or expression of that current it's just weakness all year round. Fact is that until that addict starts hating prolactin then he won't make progress in getting what he imagines himself having.

This is why I say that you can "manifest" whatever you imagine getting. The LOA space blew up because copium is on the highest point in history now due to such insane levels of conditioning in everybodies lives. This is why I despise the statements about NG saying "don't lift a finger to make it happen". That's insane. Nobody who applies that can make progress in a meaningful way. Implied involvement is in almost every case, basically all of them really, necessary. Biological adaptation REQUIRES pushing limits of capacity forward to expand. Inwardly it's the same thing, and that's why being willing to face the rejection of the weak is something you should look forward to, not resent. When you're in that place for real, your existence will inspire them to expand, since you're the embodiment of their capacity. This is what I said about acting functional reveals the weaknesses in others and often "changes" them.

People in this world are driven by what stimulates them. This is why I taught as a first principle that minimising needless stimulation is a way to get ahead since you're not then playing into the parasitism games out there that want to keep you small and weak. Your vitality is your ticket towards success in life. Your vitality is your sense of self. They go hand in hand. This is what I said ages back and now it's obviously clear. The currents that move you that come through you from God that you're accepting is how this works. That drive, that vision, that movement and involvement, that moves and circulates the currents to transform who you are metaphysically. Your field geometry metaphysically speaking then becomes more yang, that will reflect in your attitude, confidence, and most importantly, your outward appearance since that's the direct reflection of the coherency of your inward state. Those who are born deficient will mentally also be deficient. That's just how it has to be. There's no way around that. If deep satisfaction cannot be attained by fulfilling natural striving then you cannot even begin the immortality work. This is where I waver in practice from the alchemist in accelerating this work. If the foundation that's taught is vitality maxxing if you know all of what goes into that, then you then open up the spiritual level expansion to a much higher degree. That's necessary for the work to be done. Is it in every case this way? Well unless God has plans to keep you small then I doubt that it's anything except your own weakness and failure to involve yourself in what you want that keeps you stuck. In the beginning, it will be comparisons to others that will drive the frustration, seeing the juiced up 10's get absolutely swept away without effort by some 18 year old Greek God who worked his whole life on vitality cultivation when you then at 35 look at yourself and all your sagging yin based figure and want to put a hole in the wall for the feeling of true resentment. It's not resentment at you, it's at your parents. That's where this starts. If you had functional figures in your house, especially the father figure to demonstrate that point of comparison of function to then draw your capacity out, then you'll grow up accordingly. If that's not present, then unless another figure is present to play that role then you'll almost certainly manifest the biology of a cuck basically, someone who watches. Your beliefs shape your biology. If you get stimulated by seeing degeneracy occur that's supporting your lack of vitality then it's a sign you're seriously traumatized because of the lack of meaningful support in life. That is what draws out of you that capacity for the expression of the yang current. Once again, without a catalyst to draw it out then it will remain locked away to stay safe in the environment where there is no expansion encouraged. the parental projections will become your life, you will life to please them and that is the opportune of the manifestation of those traits. This is how the metaphysical nature applies to that, and also why when you wake up and get that drive online then things can begin to move forward.

This is why I will argue that anyone can become an 8+. Easy, IF they have that drive that is. It comes through you at that point. When the blackpill kids get their stuff sorted out and recognize the metaphysical side of things that are revealed in how biology responds to the inward view of ourselves that stems from psychological conditioning then we can begin to open up more effective ways of applying meaningful expansion of the biology. It's far more than just doing the so called work, because yeah that's obviously necessary but I will argue that the one who CRAVES the expansion will get infinitely faster and better results. That true desire for expansion MUST be cultivated and the way you get there is by willing to throw away the family unit and the rest of the world from validating you since that is in core the foundation of why you're here now, aside from malnutrition and other things like that though I'd argue that if you're inwardly expressive as that expanded type then nourishing food will show up for you some way some how. The inward level needs to go all the way into cutting through every level of the trash that keeps you small and being willing to accept that the whole world in its entirety is going after you to keep you down where they can cast projections onto you only frames things more in perspective. The inward expression will be reflected on the exterior, to the degree that you can accept who you really are, and how that will very likely go against what's established as acceptable.

The fact is that you will not find someone who manifests signs of high self confidence and such without their biology also reflecting that. NG himself said the body is an "emotional mirror" many times. If that's the case then that would imply that the biology must represent the inward expression, correct? The inward expression when taken all the way MUST express the shifts in for example hormonal foundation that will literally SHAPE the body, and the genetic expression can be fulfilled since sufficient nourishing current is available through that willing expansion and vitality cultivation through respecting ones self fully. That's where God is found, is he not? If we house God then those who carry MORE of God must represent higher forms of perfection? Correct? Therefore if we're all attracted to perfection then we're attracted to the geometry of God, and those who are more themselves in their full capacity will represent this and manifest the experiences accordingly without ever consciously imagining anything they want in this world. They will just know what they want and they will be moved accordingly.

Think about this. The most direct manifestation of Jing is bones and organs. Jing is the closest substance to God, next to qi which is as the alchemist calls "generative starlight". Doing the gazing and such will tap you into more of a supply of that current, though as I've always said, one method in a vacuum won't get you massive results. Taking that qi and moving it will be 10x more effective and this is what I've experienced with especially dynamic gazing. It has that settling ability where the vitality just "integrates" in you and you carry it with you. I swear, even though your physical structure doesn't shift when you do it much, it will still draw stares. I've experienced this too many times for it not to matter, provided you're still integrated within a functional life around that of course. So Jing being a manifestation of bone, organs, structure itself, and that matrix of the subconscious mind being the aetheric template which is the perfected form of your body in genetic capacity except on a field geometry level, that appearance you see when you do advanced gazing especially will be who you're embodying by doing God work. Theurgy, which is where all of this leads to. Bones will move, and this is what the alchemist has told me as he's experienced this himself, who by the way stands so tall. I don't know his exact height but his legs are insanely long I can say that and his face is solid like you'd not believe, even for someone who's going on 60 years old. The inner work DOES matter, because as far as I know the alchemist doesn't train hard but still has such a stature. What manifests is the currents, ultimately, which in the biology must be reflected by the hormones and such, which are the basis of vitality in the body and will obviously reflect the inward level approach to life as well. It's all God.

Manifesting SP stuff requires vitality. It requires function. It requires expansion. NG never told you that, but it's the fact. Nobody can prove otherwise. NOBODY. These fools will need to get real if they want to get the 10's. Man that should inspire you. You're not pleasing the 10's, they're going to please you, because you're the one who has the vitality cultivated. How do you do that? You apply RS completely. The only model of complete metaphysical transformation. I also want to make it clear too, that there are high level women out there who will still settle for lower, they exist. The thing is those types are not psychologically functional the same way as you'd expect. There's trauma hiding under the surface that's not manifested on the biology yet, but it's there. That's why I never deal in black and whites when it comes to these things, though I will still say there's a black or white about either being vital enough or not to get what you want, because the between space is sign land. Reality is teasing you about your lacks. The ones who pull high rated women are going to have the metaphysical composition to play the role that woman needs to process her traumatic trash. That's what it is. She likes him ONLY for that function, which is to use him as a parasite so that she can expand. That's just the mechanics of how this works, and guys by the way are the same. We only like those who reveal our conditioning as well. That's just how it is, stimulation. The stimulation is what moves this, and that by the way is NOT intuitive impulse, at least not when its stemming from psychological "need" from an agitated shen seeking relaxation. Intuitive impulse is ALWAYS towards expansion, and yeah the relationship will lead to an opportunity expand but I believe that intuitive impulse will always drive you inwardly to face pressure in meaningful ways and that's why we don't listen to it because the conditions will come up as a wall to deny how we really feel. That's what's going on. That's what we all experience and observe.

LOA is coming down harder than ever and none of the coaches who made bank off these people will be standing up at the end of this winning. RS and similar models will be the only thing left standing because it's the fact and all the copium addicts who got stuck in mental stimulation cycles all day and ruining their lives will want to totally leave LOA behind forever because it's trash. NG by telling people to not lift a finger to make their vision come to reality is insane, especially for someone who's on the fence. The ONLY way to correctly interpret this is that God moves through us all and that "we" as the consciousness playing the role doesn't lift the finger since God does all that through us, but we by accepting natural striving and cutting through the conditions will be "lifting a finger" because that's pressure right there to expand that's being felt and mediated in meaningful ways.

Fundamentally, to sum it all up. If you lack vital expanding nourishing yang current as a guy, you're never ever going to be satisfied because that is necessary to actually feel satisfaction in the first place since you're literally malnourished. That vitality when it's overflowing will manifest the 10's naturally since you ARE a magnet and your current is that attractive force. No way to deny that. You need to cultivate the current, manifest it, get real and go all the way. This reality is here to break you down into fine powder and reshape you into a higher form than ever before. Nobody in your past had to do this, but you will because that's the play that's going on right now and God demands we play these roles. So own it and get real.

"So this body, . . you put it through hell, may I tell you? But you put it through hell to learn certain lessons. For we are told, “the Law is spiritual.” But man does not know the Law is spiritual until he has gone through all these fires of experience, and then he discovers that it is spiritual; and in the end, when the whole thing unfolds within him, then the Law becomes easy for him to operate, . . but not until the end. For we are told: “God has consigned all men to disobedience, that he may have mercy upon all.” He “has consigned all men to disobedience, that He may have mercy upon all.”

Here is a simple story . A boy born in poverty, born in Odessa, Russia, in a Jewish family who knew nothing of full meals; he was the oldest of a family of five. At a very tender age his mother died, leaving just a few babies. He was then maybe, I would say, ten. He had to work to support the family. His father was a worker, but could not bring in enough to feed the family. He never knew what it was to have a new pair of shoes, a new pair of pants, a new shirt, a new hat. Everything was given by charity, and these gifts were not new things; they were simply hand-me downs, what people had on. So, when he wore out the burlap shoe, he could go back and get another pair of things to wrap his foot in cold Russia.

He got a job going to the bank every day with large denominations of paper, and they would be exchanged for silver and copper. So when he came back he had the equal amount of money, this time in silver and copper. And one day, standing before the teller, the cashier, he noticed that the copper and the silver had similar external markings; they looked alike. And he wondered to himself, “wouldn’t it be wonderful if he made a mistake? Wouldn’t it be wonderful if that cashier made a mistake and gave me silver instead of copper?”

At that moment he assumed that the cashier did, and in his mind’s eye he took the things and then walked back to the store. He knew the cashier had not done it, but he simply wiped it out and played a little game. And he walked back feeling that the cashier had made the mistake and he wondered: “Now what would I do? I will go into a restaurant and eat for the first time in my life to where I feel satisfied. I will eat until it comes through my ears, then I’ll buy a pair of shoes and then I’ll buy a pair of slacks.” He knew that it would cover that much. When he got back to the store the man hadn’t made a mistake, but he had the joy of walking in that assumption.

The next day the man made that mistake. And he realized it the minute the man made the mistake. So he went to another bank and changed the money into the right amount so that he could take back the right amount to the store, leaving this money over. And with that extra money, he said, “I wrestled all day with myself, and that night when I went to bed I could hardly sleep. I wrestled and wrestled with myself because that was in conflict with what my dead mother had taught me. ‘Thou shalt not steal, thou shalt not covet.’ The next day my hunger and my desire to have a new pair of shoes and a new pair of pants overpowered what I had heard from my mother, and I ate until it came through, not my ears, but till I was stuffed. Then I bought myself a pair of slacks and I bought myself a pair of shoes.”

Well, who did it? “If the Law had not come into the world, I would never have known sin. If the Law did not say, ‘You shall not covet,’ I would not know what it is to covet, and yet He who is guiding me consigned me to disobedience.”

So here is the lady led like a puppet by this current that she could not control. It controlled her, forming out of her and in her that which could perfectly reflect itself. It is the story of Christ. “Until Christ be formed in you,” so we are told. “Christ reflects the glory of God, and is the express image of His person.”

Well who is forming the Master? The word translated “Master” means the Supreme Authority, the Controller, God, the Lord. That’s what it means. So when they use the word, “Master,” you look it up, and you will see it means the Supreme Authority, the Lord, God, the Controller. So the Controller is in control of every life in the world. That Controller is God and you are consigned to disobedience that He may have mercy upon you."

13/12/25

If the body is an "emotional filter" as NG has quoted 4 times at least now, then why wouldn't your hormones and such not play a role since they're what manifest AS EMOTION, vital currents and substances. They're the same thing,

Neville's thoughts if leaving permanently - unknown date

Now let us go into the Silence.

* * *

If you would like to tell the story as I’m telling it, may I encourage you to start. Start! If you feel that you aren’t qualified, forget it. A man or woman who tells me that he feels or she feels qualified to do it, I would suggest to them wait awhile. It’s when you feel that you’re inadequate…as Paul said, “Why should I?” As Moses said, “Why should I?” He stuttered; the other had a thorn in his side. And no one who does this work when they start really feels that he’s qualified. So don’t wait until you think you are ready one hundred percent, just start. It will come. All it needs is sincerity on your part. If you really want to do it, do it. Don’t ask anyone to ordain you, not in this work. There was no one who ordained Moses or ordained Paul, he simply started. He believed it, he tried it, he proved it, and then he told it. I started on my wife’s birthday, the second day of February, 1938. I started on a borrowed five dollar bill to pay the rent. The War was not on and in spite of what you might read in the papers we were still in the Depression, and there was not a job in sight. I rented the place at Steinway Hall for five dollars which sat about seventy. And that’s how I started. I didn’t charge…didn’t have the courage to charge. They either gave it because they loved me or they were embarrassed, and they paid the rent that night. Th ink six came. So it started from that little, little ___(??).

And may I tell you, again I speak from experience, I had no promotion, no ballyhoo, nothing, no money, completely unknown, but I wanted to tell it. And so, dressed in my best suit which was my tux, I sat in a chair. I think I went as long as fifteen minutes before I gave out, and then we asked questions. Now today, if my voice wouldn’t give out, I could go for hours and hours and hours. It never exhausts itself anymore. So I say to you who want to tell it, don’t wait until you’re prepared. You will never feel prepared. If you don’t feel like an artist feels on a first night, don’t do it. You must always feel like the artist on first night, always keyed up, always telling the greatest story ever told. So when you are…I’ve had six first nights on Broadway and I know the feeling, what it is to step before that audience and it’s all new. Everything back stage is all afi re, all electric, and you are one with it. Well, every time you take this platform you don’t take it lightly. You simply ___(??) that same thrill. You’re telling the greatest story in the world. So to you who want to do it, and I know many of you want to do it, may I tell you, do it! If you only have one…and the one will grow and grow and grow.

Now are there any questions?

Q: (inaudible)

A: No, my dear, when I go into the Silence not to ask for anything, just to enjoy the Silence, when I come out the hands are parched, my mouth is parched, and it acts almost like a diuretic. In fact, it acts like a diuretic.

Q: And you think that has nothing to do with telling the law?

A: No, I’m just sharing with those who will listen to me my own symptoms when I go into the Silence. But the little child certainly didn’t have parched hands and a dry mouth and she didn’t rush to the bathroom. She simply closed her eyes, communed with self, felt that she was actually, she was taking her friend with her to San Diego, and so convinced was she she said, “Th ank you”; then the mother had a change of heart and said “Yes, you may take her.” So don’t look upon these as outer symptoms. I told you these things only to share with you should you have them not to be disturbed, not to get excited…it’s a natural thing.

Q: When Jesus said, “I felt virtue go out of me” that didn’t pertain to that sort of thing, in helping someone? When the woman touched him, she received help. Doesn’t that go with giving help?

A: First of all, Ina, whenever you think of Jesus Christ think of Jesus Christ as your own wonderful being, not a “he” out there, walking like a flesh and blood being. It’s your own being, your own Imagination, that’s Jesus Christ. I will not deny wearing these garments of flesh and blood that we do wear them out, they do tire. And so, I know after a day of interviews I used to be completely pooped. I would give my all…I never took it lightly. So when I would say goodbye to the last one at five thirty in the afternoon, oh, the one thing I wanted was a good double or triple Scotch. I was simply completely gone. I was giving all day, and the body simply is an emotional filter. I would go into the Silence and feel intensely the good that someone asked me to hear for them.

So when I broke the spell and I said goodbye to them, took them to the elevator, that was something going out. At the end of a day of that, if you take it seriously you were tired. That’s why I don’t have any interviews. I’m pushing a thousand…you can’t get that old and just keep on forever.

Q: In reading scripture this morning, I came across “Ask and it shall be given, seek and ye shall find, knock and it shall be opened to you…”

A: Well, the question is, in scripture this morning he is reading the passage, “Ask, seek…” read it for me again.

Q: “Ask and it shall be given, seek and ye shall find, knock and it shall be opened to you.” At the spiritual, at the deepest level, why the differentiation between these three directions ask, seek, knock?

A: Well, put…the question is ___(??) ask, seek and knock—he wants to know why the differentiation between asking, seeking and knocking. Really they aren’t. If you take the one, knocking…knock and it shall be opened unto you…we go to Revelation now for the interpretation. “Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone will open unto me, I will come in and sup with him and he with me.” Well, who is the door? He said, “I am the door.” So that we can knock forever, but if I don’t open, then I don’t admit the solution of my problem. It is there knocking; I have to give acceptance to it. “Seek and ye shall find.” Well, you don’t go seeking. I’m looking for something and I’m told to assume that I have what I seek and I’ll find it. So I wouldn’t really tear them apart; it’s a unity.

Q: (inaudible)

A: Oh, my dear! The question is, would I tell the story of Adam and Eve and God. Well, that’s a whole, whole series of lectures. There is only God, my dear, in the world…there’s nothing but God. There’s no room for another. So the fall was not a mistake. It’s a plot, it’s a plan where God limits himself to the very limit of contraction, of opacity called man; for the purpose of then expanding beyond the translucence that was his prior to that decision to limit himself—because, there’s no limit to God’s expansion. If we think of a God that is already limitless in all things, then it’s not a God that could ever enjoy infinite expansion, infinite wisdom. So think of the infinity without boundaries. And to reach beyond where I am, limitless as I seem to be, I must come down to contraction and wear the garment of opacity; then break through like a seed breaking through. Have you ever seen a little seed coming through granite? I’ve seen them actually come through granite. You see them come through cement sidewalks…not through the I Am Is the Way 193 little crevice but actually break the whole thing through. Well, a seed must fall into the ground and die, the seed being God and God being his Word. It’s planted in this opacity called man, and it breaks through, and it’s God. There’s nothing but God! In fact, Yod He Vau He, which we interpret as God, as I AM, which we call it Jehovah, the He Vau He, which is the verb, its original meaning was “to fall, or the one who causes to fall”; or it was “to blow, or the one who causes the wind to blow.” So here, the descent was a design. We’re told that in the 3rd chapter of John: “No one ascends into heaven but he who first descended” (verse 13). So if the Son of man who is called Jesus Christ ascends, then he had to first descend. Well, that could not have been a mistake. No one can ascend but the one who descended. Well, it was God who descended. It was God who took the fall, in the sense of he limited himself to this [body]; and completely forgetting that he is God he’s not pretending that he’s me, he became me. He’s not pretending that he’s us. He emptied himself we are told in Philippians, completely emptied himself of his divine life and took upon himself the form of man; and finding himself in the form of a man became obedient unto death even the death on the cross of man (2:5). And from this restriction he’s breaking through, and when he actually breaks through he is greater than he was prior to his descent. Truth is an ever-increasing illumination and he said “I am the truth.” For you can enjoy ___(??) infinity forever and forever, but it is God’s purpose to ever expand. So, as the poet said, “Be patient”… someone asked about these four acts of creation here in this world…“Oh,” he said, “Be patient, for the great Master, the Poet, will show us in some fifth act what this wild drama means.” Just imagine what the fifth one is going to be. Q: Neville, as in the physical body where we have some voluntary muscles and organs and other involuntary things, is that the same truth prevalent on a spiritual level as the law is always voluntary and the act of God always involuntary?

A: Bill, I don’t know…

Q: In other words, all acts of God are involuntary, there are none induced?

A: As far as I’m concerned, every mystical experience I’ve ever had was involuntary.

Q: And the law was always voluntary…

A: The law, as far as I’m concerned, it’s an act on our part. We are the operant power…unless we operate, it doesn’t work. But as far as God’s will unfolding in us, it unfolds automatically, it’s involuntary. We don’t earn it; it’s grace, grace, grace and more grace.

Q: (inaudible)

A: Well, Ben, in this case, if you desire you would desire this consciousness only because God has sent the famine upon you. He said “I will send a famine upon the world. It will not be for bread or for the thirst of water, but for the hearing of the word of God” (Amos 8:11). So when that comes upon you, you may think, well now, I voluntarily seek him. No, the time has come upon you and when it’s upon you, not a thing in this world can satisfy that hunger but an experience of God.

Q: Does the use of the law have anything to do with the revelations? I mean could a person be unaware of the law and still have a mystical experience?

A: Why certainly, my dear. The law came after the Promise. The Promise is in the beginning. Paul personified in scripture, in Galatians, how would you take a book and personify it? Paul said, “Scripture foreseeing that the gentiles would be saved through faith,” then he goes on to say “Therefore Abraham…”—the whole thing begins in the loins of Abraham, it all comes out like the sands of the sea. Therefore Abraham was given a sort of preview of the gospel so he could say in the 8th of John “Abraham rejoiced that he was to see my day; he saw it and was glad” (verse 56). Abraham saw your day when he lived 2,000 years before you were born—if you take it in that light. But the whole, all of us, saw the play. We saw it in its detail and then amnesia set in. We had to forget, and then we entered a foreign land which this land and we are slaves. We may have a million dollars, we may have tonight…many a multi-millionaire is a slave of his millions, can’t sleep, who is stealing from him, watching all things, he has no rest. If anyone comes near him, he wonders if they want my money? If you take a very, very wealthy young girl who is left, say, a hundred million dollars, beautifully invested—and we have in our land dozens of them, not publicized—but if publicized would they have any assurance at any time that the boy who sought their hand really loved them for themselves? I won’t mention names but you have in your mind’s eye, you can think of a dozen who have been married seven times and they at all times had to marry say one person with a title, a prince. Of all the silliness in the world, he’s a prince, and this one is so and so, this one’s a count. What title?—the only aristocracy that I would accept is the aristocracy of the Spirit—an aristocracy of flesh and blood that cannot inherit the kingdom of heaven. We’re told that no one born of woman is greater than John, yet I tell you the least in the kingdom is greater than John. Well, take the greatest man who walks the face of the earth because of his stature, his intelligence, his know-how, his everything, he is not comparable to the least in the kingdom because he can’t get in with these qualifications. So the only aristocracy is the aristocracy of the Spirit.

Well, I’m away beyond my time, Mr. Fisher ___(??).

Well, thank you so much. And when I return if you’re on my mailing list, you will know where I am and all about it. Thanks."

Here's a lot of quotes about different things.

So lastly he talks about the law being voluntary but the promise is not voluntary. So our birth and death conditions would come under experiences from the promise, if they're involuntary and pre-determined.

"Neville: Now are there any questions?

Question: …a physical upset? Upset when something goes wrong?

Neville: Well, as far as I am concerned, my body is an emotional filter and bears the marks of my prevalent emotions. That’s what bodies are, they’re filters. Emotional filters. And so if you persist in a certain emotion, one of despondency, one of this, one of that, eventually it will take its toll and you’ll find it leaving its mark on these filters. For they are emotional filters. To know, first of all, to know that it is so. And then to stop or try to change these prevalent emotions. You know you have friends who, whenever you meet them, they complain, always complaining. Well, that is almost a permanent state with them. Now, discriminate between the state that they occupy and the occupant. The occupant is not that.

But if they remain in a state long enough, they feel at home in that state. If you pull them out, they’ll feel ill at ease. They want to actually feel that no one understands them, that they are this, they are that. And they delight in feeling that they’re misunderstood. If you try to pull them out, they don’t want it. They revel in it. And there are people who live that way. Well, don’t you follow suit. Tell them what to do, and if they do it, they’ll come out of it. There are people who will call you on the phone and who will say, “Now look here, I want so and so.” Thank you, that’s enough. Oh no, but wait, “I must tell you the facts.” And they’ll hold you there, if you let them, for one solid half hour, giving you all the facts why it can’t be done. So they voiced what they wanted and then they proceed to tell you why it’s impossible. And so they live that way. They go through life that way." - Every natural effect unknown date.

Replace emotion with thematic currents. Boom. TCM proven correct, and the rest of the alchemy that goes along with that. If the body is a structured emotional filter then it would mean that it would be a filter for the emanations of God as his capacity unfolds through us. NG said that the garment is the emanation I believe.

Also do listen to what he said at the end of the first section about where he would come home and drink double or triple scotch and feel "intensely good". NG also said that he's getting too old to handle doing more work, which is funny actually since apparently the law can according to modern LOA manifest "whatsoever you believe".

"After your resurrection from this state of death, you no longer marry, or die, but until then you will continue to fall in love, marry, get old, and depart. They have cemeteries there too, making money or people who own them by burying things that do not die."

I just want to say that this is obviously an incorrect interpretation of scripture. The whole thing about no longer marrying after the resurrections has nothing to do with being born in a new world and no longer having marriage, though that might relate, it's actually and quit obviously pointing to the level where the marriage of the sun and the moon no longer needs to take place since the star is in the stone. That's obvious to anyone who's studies traditional alchemy. This is once again where I am critical of NG with his scriptural interpretation. So with always, there's holes in what he says, and he's not as aware as we'd think. My latest video ruffled a lot of people up because it was brutally factual about what NG really taught, which contradicted much of what modern LOA teaches in the NG space, yet the critics literally ignore what the quotes say and dance around it as always. It's insane. I don't support that doctrine, I do not believe that in all cases our death is IN DETAIL predetermined, I believe that unless you're ripe enough for expansion to complete the work then the thematic nature of how you'll die IS predetermined but not ALL is predetermined. Within the container of this reality, if you take NG at face value, there's many contradictions and I still believe that much of his later so called mystical experiences were stemming from his alcohol consumption which I KNOW leads to such types of experiences. "I know this from experience" is always his explanation as to why something in scripture is correct according to his interpretation. This is once again why RS stands above the rest, since we do not take anybody as an authority and simply watch where the data leads us into correct and demonstrable accounts that everyone who tries such can verify for themselves.

Also, when NG said "power has come out of me" or whatever it was that Christ said when he was praying and healed the woman, I can say with certainty that this is obviously talking about a movement of vital currents. What else is power at that point? It's currents of thematic correspondence to resolve the damage.

Albright this is a theory I've got behind why NG talks about states and seeds and even desire being one in the same thing. I do not categories desire as he does but I can see his view on this. So he's called states and seeds eggs, and this is important because eggs are a Jing principle thematic in essence, which is what unfolds into the various currents that move us. Accepting the state/seed/desire is in his words" activating" seedtime, or the moment of reaction is the response from the emotional filter of the body that's felt as vital current moving in the channels. This is a stimulus that drives expansion, IF it's targeted correctly. So he's telling us to alter our Jing expression thematically by "feeling" into those currents, not actively, but in RESPONSE to the "reality of experience" as I call it which is overlapping the sun and the moon. Deeper state overlap moves your awareness into the subconscious level, the region of God where the structure of reality itself is manifest. This is where the whole "egg" thing and states and seeds stems from, as the supply of current that unfolds through the pathway cascade that the overlapping of the states would necessitate. I believe that ultimately his view of the so called law is totally whcked because practically speaking his SATS at night idea is so insanely inconsistent that it blows my mind he even taught it to begin with. Either way, the stimulation that's leading to an expansion. a cutting through of conditions, is the acceptance that moves qi and other substances where they need to go through the channels and that will intelligently thus drive your thematic supply/demand process. In other words, you become more functional, and that will become a draw for others who are looking for vitality to harvest for their own transformation through you. This is why parasites elicit responses from us, because they need to make their unconscious conditions conscious, and you're the carrier of the current they need to stimulate that instead of overlapping states in their own space.

This is my point. Seedtime is a reaction, or response, to something being true for you. Intuitively you'll "know" what that means psychologically because the channels by which that current is illuminating will "unpack" that implication as the charge sensation you feel. This is why "feeling" is the secret, because it's implication in action, basically. It's ALL current, not emotional, but since NG failed to grasp those functions then he had no other term to use it seems. We need to grasp that the thing about feeling eliciting seedtime is that it's simply you're illuminating regions of your unconscious for illumination to "unpack" and transform. When he says that the law and feeling is pretty much disconnected from the promise it surprises me really. He simply sees the promise as a COMPLETELY predetermined play that you have ZERO control over, though in one lecture he says you do, so. Contradictions? The seedtime he says is a reaction to life, and the MEANING/IMPLICATION of that is where the power is, meaning that's the belief, meaning charge phenomena really is a sense of belief. Right? I'm going to dive deeper into how he categorized belief and if there's any quotes that could illuminate this further but to me this whole thing where he tells us we NEED to believe doesn't make practical sense because we experience all kinds of things that we don't believe, for example as children when we learn new things, and so the only way to make sense of this is once again through charge phenomena. Feeling, current illuminating the circuits. That's pretty much what all of this can be seen through. That's probably the one thing I've been able to take away from his work uniquely, only through decoding it this way. The rest of his work is mostly useless if you ask me, since the principles are just totally against common sense like "don't lift a finger to make it happen". He's telling you to stimulate response EXCLUSIVELY in your body it would seem, and I still don't believe in every case he's talking about "top down" view where God does the movement and thus that's the explanation. He's talked about how we have no free will in ourselves to act outside of what we believe, what the seeds we've planted (or activated as he's also said before which to me makes WAY more sense and validates what I said in an old video nobody liked hearing) and thus those seeds MUST unfold since they're in procession in our field geometry as "belief". Current that moves us.

This really is a breakthrough explanation of his work that nobody else on earth has even come close to matching. I really want to put this behind paywalls and charge massive amounts of money for it because it's worth that, though I still want to have impacts in this space and do what I do best, schooling ignorant fools on facts about metaphysics and alchemy. Turning this into the dream $12-16k program that goes into every detail of his work using my unique model is the goal really. Screw the trash that says I am expected to make this available free. It's all here anyway, though I'm not going to point people to it and spoon feed them all this. I just know that the people who want it will find it if they're really truly interested in learning.

There's still more study to do but getting actually rich through this work is a very valid process. Fix the appearance fully in no time, school the fools on camera without compromise and provide real world examples to sell this program to anyone looking for the definite irrefutable and tested system of manifesting ever created. Scammy especially needs to get schooled harder than you can imagine. I can't wait to see these ignorant fools scrape the bottom of the barrel of reasons as to why for years they preached useless trash when the truth comes out about NG and what he really taught and the work I've done to reveal that, thousands of unpaid hours while they showed off the glamour life. Yeah, they'll all get a wake up call very soon when the people realize they've been lied to for profit motives. Screw every coach in this space who doesn't preach common sense methods and teach NG without addressing the real mechanics like RS has revealed and preaches "imagination creates reality" without grasping what that means. It's a scam this whole thing is a scam because it's interpreted totally backwards and I've proven that. It's also going to destroy the credibility of NG as well when everybody realizes that the real mechanics of operating the law is doing FAR MORE than JUST imagining. Imagination in a vacuum keeps people stuck in pseudo satisfaction. Physical level stimulus that's meaningful is NECESSARY to stabilize a state and I will almost 100% guarantee that everybody who does get results through applying imaginal stuff already had that coming off the back of an already somewhat functional life. Suggestion that's clear unfolded at that point, which is why manifesting satisfying things when you're a broke loser with no real basis for confidence or success is never going to work for them. The necessary change MUST take place through the exterior to build that meaningful autosuggesting experience that validates "oh so I CAN be myself" and drop the importance of the conditions, which in turn will change their "beliefs" and current expression. Anybody who teaches otherwise is a charlatan and they know it.

It's coming together so fast I can't even believe it. This study document made the whole process 10x faster because now I can just search a keyword and then find instant meanings to the terms. This blows Joseph's stupid NG AI out of the water because it's totally backed by the source and not an extrapolation of the source. The NG AI cannot tell you what I've revealed because it's literally conditioned to think the way he does and thus give examples of such. Anyone who tests it knows that, it's another scam. It's all just scam scam scam scam everywhere.

When you feel current move it's almost always going to be through state overlaps since that's how connection to the structural aspect of reality is established. Saturn. Dark mother. Earth. The aetheric substrate itself you could argue, though I can't prove that. The alchemist says we walk around inside the subconscious mind that's been rolled/folded up into what we experience. I know what he means by that but from RS we more or less view it as unfolded than folded, since the seed/source of emanation that contains the Jing for the currents to unfold in correct sequence is an emanation and not purely an elemental composition that exists in a sort of bubble or container. Every seed overlaps every other seed in the field geometry. It must, since every meridian connects to every other meridian in some way, not in a matrix way but through a linear procession way where the "steam" of one Jiao can raise into another and as I say "colour" the output of those downstream channels that the current moves through, thus effectively "overlapping". The channels themselves don't, but the currents and their format do. All the experiments I've done on myself through the TCM lens has revealed all of this clearly to me.

"Well, why did the father say to him, “I believe; help thou my unbelief”? Now, that is what I am trying to do this night, to help the unbelief. You say, “I believe”—but not to the degree that it will produce that effect. Well, how could I test my degree of belief? There is one supreme test you can give to any belief. If I say to you now and I mean this sincerely, “imagining creates reality,” I mean that. If that is true, it’s the Word of God. You might not find the words “imagining creates reality” in scripture, but you will find similar words implying the same thought. You will find these words in the Book of Mark, the 11th of Mark, “Whatever you desire, when you pray, believe you have received it, and you will” (verse 24). Well, isn’t that the same thing? If I believe that I’ve received what at the moment reason denies and my senses deny isn’t that imagining then must create reality? For imagining in my dictionary, and the word imaginary, is defined as “existing only in the Imagination, and, therefore, unreal.”" - Our real beliefs 1966

So here he defines imagining as existing only in the mind. He's talked about if you experience holding a tennis ball that this ball you see must exist somewhere and thus you can experience it. Well this imagery is to elicit a connection to the channels that would imply something about it to you. You see if someone imagines something scary they'll react internally with fear. They'll feel the current and a corresponding emotional sensation running parallel.

"Now you may go out tonight and say that imagining creates reality, and you could rehearse it so that you will say it in your dream, but do you believe it? If you believe it, this is the test how you believe. Try to realize what a severe test of belief action is. I say I believe, but I don’t act upon it. If I really believe, I couldn’t restrain the impulse to act, I couldn’t. If I believe that imagining creates reality and I’m faced with a problem, it doesn’t take me long to conceive the solution of the problem. I don’t care what it is, what the problem is. If I have a problem, I need not wait to ask anyone, I could conceive the solution. Well, does imagining create reality? Will I act upon it and simply imagine? Will I? If I don’t, then I haven’t met the test, and so my so-called belief could only be a half-belief. And so, action tests belief. When I am faced with anything in this world, do I act or do I exhaust all the little channels first before I act? The chances are that man goes through everything that is called a wise channel, everything, and when he exhausts all the channels, maybe, in sheer desperation, finding no other place to turn he might turn back to scripture, and then act. And would he act? If he acts, the promise is this, listen to it carefully, “Whatever you desire, when you pray, believe you have received it, and you will receive it.” That’s the promise. “And thy word is truth.” So will we believe?"

So with this whole belief thing, I also believe strongly relates to state overlap. More belief means you're operating closer to the subconscious mind, as NG did say faith is how the promise is unfolded. Faith in this context means connection to capacity I believe. We know that faith can mean more of a sort of knowing trust for something as well, comfort, though metaphysically we can view this as connection to innate capacities that stem from source of God.

What he's saying above as well, as he clearly defines belief here, meaning no action. If you believe it you won't want to act. You're certain of something to happen, it seems that's what he's getting at. Well practically I don't really know anyone who experiences this as how manifestation works, though there are some stories that might point to this but if it's not consistently how things are experienced then it can't be the variable at play. Interestingly here he talks about "half belief". He's literally telling us that action tests belief. That's incorrect. Does the sports athlete who's training to become world champion sit around and imagine and believe and do nothing? No action? No way. That's why I consider this to be practically damaging. I know what he's talking about with the charges and such here being stable to not make you want to impulsively act out of dysfunction and NEED but action can and will be a part of the bridge in many cases as the currents unfold through you. This is the kind of trash that the garbage coaches will try and use against RS to say how action isn't belief and it's going against NG. Well too bad, that's not how most of what we experience unfolds and everyone knows this. I am also not saying that inaction is never useful, because I've had things show up through inaction before, though I'll still say that those are only true in a small number of instances. I've had impossible things manifest where I had no willing participation in "making it happen", though I thematically involved myself in that through state streak and it came through me with the thoughts that ended up manifesting that outcome. I did nothing to aid it to happen, almost because I didn't expect anything to happen in the first place, which once again points to the fact that this was either an insane coincidence that's literally like one in thousands at least or that the whole idea about belief is once again flawed given how we observe manifestation unfolding. I don't care what NG said if it's not consistent with observation which is what RS is rooted in and how all manifestation doctrine should also be rooted in to prove causality of mechanics.

"And so, action tests belief. When I am faced with anything in this world, do I act or do I exhaust all the little channels first before I act? The chances are that man goes through everything that is called a wise channel, everything, and when he exhausts all the channels, maybe, in sheer desperation, finding no other place to turn he might turn back to scripture, and then act."

This section especially intrigues me. So he considers acts to be imaginal acts, not physical acts here. Obviously that's what he's talking about. Then, how would the quote from the book of James prove this. "faith without works is dead". So if having faith (I'm assuming relates to belief here AKA thematic current supply) is a test of acts then how would belief without acts work if acts test belief? James literally says that

"An assumption is an act of faith, and without faith it is impossible to please God." - a lesson in scripture 1967

There's a definition.

Also I've just thought. How come NG rarely ever talked about superhuman abilities if that's technically possible according to the idea that "all things are possible to God". How come we don't see literal superhuman abilities manifesting on the regular? There's one examples I believe he talked about where a woman burned her hand and she unburned it instantly with feeling that it was healed. Who knows if that's real, because the Maylo child story was another con job as I've proven earlier. It seems some of his stories miss pretty crucial details, or are overexaggerated, much like modern LOA culture.

"You do not have to limit your power of belief to what your reasonable mind dictates. The choice and its limitations are entirely up to you, for all things exist in the human imagination and it is from your imagination that your belief stems. If you go beyond the dictates of reason, it must be via your imagination, and since all things now exist there, you can at any moment go beyond what your reason and senses dictate."

So is this under the context of "cushioning the blows of life" as he's clearly stated over 8 times as the WHOLE POINT OF THE LAW, or that you can manifest superhuman abilities and such? Clearly when we look at the results, it's almost always stemming from basic things like money and health and social life shifts and such things like that. It's basic worldly things that contribute to almost everything that NG uses as success stories. Nothing truly extraordinary. You'd think those stories would prove the so called law irrefutably then right? Why not use that since the law can do literally anything. Well I'll tell you theoretically it can, ONLY through supply of sufficient vitality, Jing. This is what deep theurgy is designed for by bridging the inner and the outer to manifest for example lightning storms in a room. Given what my qigong master has demonstrated to me it's clear that those who are WELL NOURISHED are able to "believe" in superhuman. The fear and doubt and all that in my eyes is a lack of nourishment or willingness to expose yourself to the illuminating starlight of God which will make you drop the condition that's burning your Jing and throwing away your capacity.

You could argue that with belief, you're believing more in yourself, your innate capacity, with ALL of this, as an IMPLICATION. That's your supply to even enable the "reaction" to the experience of meaning to unfold through you since the currents that are contained within the seed that are accepted are now free to move. I hope you understood that point because it's big. The seed contains all the elements to unfold into the experience, just as NG has said about states, and desires, and obviously seeds. They contain the info to manifest it from dwelling in it. I see all of this as current supply. If you're tapped into your innate nature as yourself you'll be moving with natural striving, that infinite supply, and it will be natural, otherwise you'll be in conditioning that bind you to lack.

"As you are seated here you have the capacity to believe. You may believe in something stupid, but you believe and your belief will make it work. The one I speak of as God is your mightier self, yet your slave, for purposes of his own. He waits on you as indifferently and as swiftly when your will is evil as when it is good. He does it by conjuring images of good and evil just as though they were real. Allowing you to imagine whatever you desire, he projects it upon this screen of space in order for you to experience it. You can move into it so naturally and so easily you can forget the thoughtless moment when the seed was planted, and therefore do not recognize your own harvest." - all things are possible 1969

So this quote is interesting. He's talking about a "thoughtless moment" that activated seedtime, the reaction. A THOUGHTLESS moment, which you can "so easily" forget. You move into it so naturally he says. It must be comfortable. This sounds like intuitive impulse to me, a sudden sensation that moves you, an "impression" of action stemming from the seed unfolding. So we can clearly see here as an example of a comfortable belief manifesting in this "thoughtless moment" more or less which was natural. Comfortable movement through having belief. Belief here must be relating to a stable shen, minimal "needing" agitation. That's where magic happens since intuitive impulse sticks out like a sore thumb.

"But I do know from experience that on this level, if you dare to assume you are what you want to be, your inner conviction, your feeling of certainty will bring it to pass. When you embrace the desired state, you have assumed its impregnation, and its fulfillment has its own appointed hour. It will ripen and flower. If the state is slow in objectifying itself wait, for it is sure and will not be late." - an inner conviction 1968

This sounds like comfort, confidence, stability. This means you're well nourished. Like being well nourished with vitality IS the whole "assumption" thing really. Look at all of it in charge terms, implication, comfort, acceptance. There's no agitation, a stable shen.

"We rise to a higher level of consciousness, not because we have curbed our passions, but because we have cultivated our virtues. In truth, a meek man is one who is in complete control of his moods. And they are the highest, for he who desires to walk with the highest, must keep a high mood." - arise unknown date

Well here he's saying that keeping a "high mood" is the highest of consciousness. This is someone who's healthy and functional and stable and confident. Simple.

So here's some examples of this "high mood" I've found.

"If you are observant, you will notice the swift echo or response to your every mood and key it to the circumstances of your daily life. When you understand the relationship between circumstances, you will know that everyone you meet is part of yourself.

In the creation of a new life, you must begin with a change of mood which opens the door to a higher level. Start now to mold your life around a community of high moods.

Individuals, as well as communities, grow spiritually in proportion to their higher ideals. If your ideal is low, you sink to its depths, but if it is exalted, you are elevated to heights unimagined. You must keep a high mood if you would walk with the highest.

All forms of creative imagination imply elements of feeling, for it is the ferment without which no creation is possible. There is nothing wrong with the desire to transcend your present state. The world would not progress without man’s dissatisfaction with himself."

There's a lot in this one. So here he's considering high ideals as like high moods. Ideals. He's talked about this many times before. So living in a high mood in my eyes is more or less acting on what's satisfying for you and nourishing and expanding most importantly. He then does on to say ALL forms of creative imagination IMPLY elements of feeling. The last part of that quote is pretty common sense. I could also consider a high mood to be stable and yet powerful activation of the shen, to "feel" that higher ideal and thus imaginal scenes will naturally come through you automatically. Those thoughts will have power, as I've observed. You don't "try" to think, the state of self respect you live in and self nourishment you live in where your field geometry is strongly supported will unfold these so called moods and ideals through you. Health is basically how I consider this whole thing to work more or less, not exclusively but I'd say that's a big part of it.

When before he talked about communities as well. in contrast to individuals none the less, it became obvious to me that he's talking about groups of people living in a community, not an inner group of belief or whatever, though the mentalism fools will call other people dolls of belief of whatever.

We're going all the way with this one.

15/12/25

"The world, not understanding scripture, thinks that God will send a physical famine. Oh, that is possible, it happens all over the world anyway. It’s not because we cannot supply the food . . the problem is economic. We are told to curtail production, as we cannot find bins large enough to house our supply. We put an enormous weight on the taxpayer because we allow food to rot, as we do not know how to give it away. People are paid not to grow food, while our government talks about not being able to supply. Our southern states alone could grow enough to feed and clothe the world, but how to do it under the present economy? I AM not an economist so I cannot tell you how; but I do know it is not a lack of production, but rather a lack of economy. The economic problem I cannot solve" - A divine event 1969

So here we have NG telling us there's limits to the law. He "CANNOT" solve the economic problem. He's basically telling us that certain things in life cannot be changed for the better, and this is one of them. He calls politicians out for knowingly lying to us and he says that the economy is bad because of government corruption. That's what he's getting at here, clearly. That's an objective fact, though it doesn't have to be a personal fact of impact and implication. You can avoid most of the impacts of that personally by altering your situation economically. That will come through expanding sense of self.

This below quote is from a lecture by "Freedom Barry" in 1996 which is on the website but not linked anywhere without searching for it since I don't know how to categorize it. He's talking about his experiences with NG and it's got some interesting things. It talks about NG taking "private students" as well as his "I'll tell it to the bare walls" quote when he was told about his audience leaving because of what he was saying. The quote is from cool wisdom books, so props to whoever there does all this research. It's deeper than I've done into the history, though whoever runs that website likely has contacts with unique data. That's his natural striving, I'm here to analyze this from the RS perspective and filter out the trash from what's useful.

"I went to the lecture, and there I began kicking myself up and down all the hills that I wasted the opportunity, because this began to unfold. I went back to see him after the first lecture. I said, “Do you teach privately?” He said, “No.” As short as that. He said, “You are the operant Power.” Not meaning my person, although I’m afraid I must have thought at that time that was what he meant. “You are the operant Power.” He said that it’s a Principle that proves itSelf in performance. “I no longer take individual students.” Well, I continued going; this was then in June until he closed. I heard him five or six times before he closed and went for his two weeks in San Francisco. When he came back from San Francisco, I gave him two case histories of where I had put it to work. He was delighted. So, I never missed a single lecture from then until the calendar had come around another year, and he went to San Francisco, and that was where he had this “Birth from Above,” which changed the entire direction of his teaching. And that hall was full when he opened. It held three hundred people there in the Fine Arts Auditorium at the Wilshire in Los Angeles. That hall was full, and he told this shocking story in the most literal terms of being born through the skull of his head as a womb opens. And the next night, that was on Monday, the next Thursday, there were thirty people. The next Monday, there were twelve. He kept telling it, and so after the third night, and the audience was down to twelve, Freddy Messenger, who was his agent, he said, “Neville, you’ve got to stop telling that story or you’ll have no audience at all.” He said, “Then I’ll tell it to the bare walls.” And Neville would have. That’s the beauty of it, and he almost did. He did begin shaving off those rough edges; those very clinical aspects of the way it was being told. He certainly did no modify in any way the meaning of it. It was pure Scripture, but told in the language of person, in a place, doing a thing. So, when he had this vision of being born from above, and his own audience was falling away, and he asked me… he had his wife ask me when I bought my ticket to go in, he said, “Ask him if he will give us a ride home tonight, because Neville never drove in his life; he never owned a car; he never had a driver’s license; neither did his wife. I was so delighted to have those people in my car; they were the stars. I even washed the car."

So he talks about his manager, "Freddy Messenger". I've heard of this guy before somewhere I swear. Either way he's being told that since his lecture attendance went from being packed out to having near single digits attending that he needs to stop talking about his story of "the birth from above" and NG basically said that he'd preach it to the bare walls. I guess that shows where the intentions of NG was.

Here's another quote.

"Freedom: That’s a lovely expansion of the use of the word. If you can be as passionate in your devotion to the Discovery, as you have been to the misconception. I can remember Neville saying, using his system, he would say: “It’s all a matter of intensity.” And he said, “People will say, ‘I hate that son of a bitch,’ but who will say with that same degree of intensity: ‘Isn’t she nice?'” If you can put that much intensity… I think this is what Tirza is saying, that the passion that has been spent and misspent were redirected with that intensity, you could bring in the millenium. Love what You Are, not the shape you… with the same degree of intensity, wouldn’t it be wonderful to want that? And it does take an emotional response."

He talks about intensity. That's another term to study. I know that NG talks about powerful emotions and such, though this intensity term in my eyes must relate to a sensation of current moving, much like a quickening. Perhaps he's inducing a quickening willingly (heart kidney axis with breathing technique for example) in order to forcibly "impress" thematic composition that relates to having something. I have used this method before and seen up and down outcomes, I've seen it work twice out of probably 60+ tries, so I will say it's likely another factor and not the technique. A few clients I've given this to who do advanced gazing on the regular also have experienced manifesting SPs using this same method, as they tell me at least. It's something that has SOMETHING there, though the quickening effect of an "inner sexual climax" so to say is more or less what his method is about and trying to attain on a metaphysical and current intensity level. That's not always true though because we know fleeting thoughts with no intensity manifest too. You could argue that those thoughts came from a highly intense experience, but I will say from the pathway work I've done and logging all the thoughts I have over the day every day for years now I've found that not to line up where there's an intense experience that thematically relates before thoughts of such nature randomly come through you.

"To you Truth is not confined by facts but by the intensity of your imagination. So here we find the embodiment of Truth, which I say is human imagination, standing in the world drama before the embodiment of reason personified as Pontius Pilate. And he is given the authority to question truth and they ask him, “What is the truth?” and Truth remains silent. He refuses to justify any action of his; he refuses to justify anything that was done to him, for he knows no man cometh unto me save I call him: no man takes away my life, I lay it down myself.

You didn’t choose me, I have chosen you. For here is Truth seeing nothing hereafter in pure objectivity, but seeing everything subjectively related to himself and he the source of all the actions that take place within his world; so Truth remains absolutely silent and says nothing when reason questions him concerning the true definition of Truth. Because when the eye opens it knows that what is an idea to sleeping man is a fact to the awakened imagination, an objective fact, not an idea. I entertain the idea of a friend and I make some wonderful concept of him in my mind’s eye and when I sleep it seems to be a wish, it seems to be the longing of my heart, but purely subjective, just an idea. And the eye within me opens, and he stands before me embodying the quality that I desired in my sleep to see him express. So what is an idea to sleeping man, the unawakened imagination, is an objective reality to awakened imagination." - awakened imagination 1954

So here he's talking about intensity. Intensity according to him is the truth.

"Truth does not depend upon fact. Truth depends upon the intensity of your imagination. Therefore, if I actually am intense about it, that is true. I might tomorrow find a corresponding fact to bear witness . . but, as I said earlier, let me not continue in that assumption and the fact will fade, proving it was not reality at all. Reality was in my assumption, and so truth depends not upon fact, but upon the intensity of imagination." - feed my sheep 1956

So here's another example. This is getting more and more clear now. Intensity obviously isn't about imaginal sensory detail, though that can be a part of it, but it's the reaction, the response, the MOTOR response as he's said. A movement of thematic vital current. More yang and action, activation. He's talked about "action" in the sense of inner actions, and an intense action which has that force of truth behind it that represents what you hold to be true, as though you're reacting to someone in your world in a heated discussion. That's what the "act" is he's talking about here. That can make sense, and now that I've fully decoded and proven that imaginal senses don't actually matter, obviously, then we can clarify the methodology. ANYTHING that elicits a movement, an action/reaction from you that corresponds to intensity of belief and truth about something being real to you, that's what he's obviously talking about. A movement of current. This is ELICITED in RESPONSE to the experience, which is obviously why I also talk about fasting from the world since that will only amplify your activating current. The heart-kidney axis for the most part rules this function. The fire into the water. Yang moving into the yin. I could make a program JUST on that and sell it for like $2000 easy. My work is the only work on earth which correctly interprets his doctrine. It's just there's SO MANY QUOTES to track..

"Now back in 1954, I awoke from a dream hearing these words: “You do not move in waking any more than you move on your bed in sleep. It is all a movement of mind. The intensity is determined by the strength of the vortex you create, which is just like a whirlwind with a center of perfect stillness. You only believe that you are moving when you are awake, as you think you move in sleep.” Well, I am a rational being and reason could not accept that statement, but I wrote it down and placed it in my Bible to await further revelation.”" - a movement of mind 1969

That is another interesting one because I know that the aetheric substrate organizes in helical vortical patterns that manifest as what we know of as particles. A point of compression and rarefaction operating in self recursion. Welcome to real physics. This is the model I worked with way back in 2019 till 2021. Interesting stuff. Eitehr way, he's talking about

"Someone sitting in a dungeon feeling abused can enter into an image of hate and cause disturbances in the world. Although he is completely unknown and buried in a dungeon, thereby unseen by the world, he can imagine with such intensity that many will be caught in its response. We are forever giving advice, when scripture has nothing to say about advice . . be it good or bad. Scripture only tells us to go and tell them the good news that you are immortal, as they are. That you created the world and simply extracted yourself from it, just as they can. Don’t give them any advice as to what they should or should not do."

So here's NG telling us again to imagine with intensity, and imagination is movement of God, theamtic current that's metaphysical and alchemical.

"Today I will say what is true concerning my world. Well, I pay so much rent and have an average income of so much, and I have obligations to life, and these seem to be the facts. That is true. I tell you: that is not true. For a true judgment need not conform to the external facts to which it relates. Truth depends upon the intensity of imagining and not upon facts. So, I will imagine that I AM ______ and I name it, that which I want to be, and believing that I AM that which I AM assuming I AM and remaining loyal to the assumption, I become it. I have done it, or I would not be here tonight." - Barabbas or Jesus 1953

Here's NG telling us that apparently he makes an "average income". He also tells us that the intensity of imagination is what matters. So I will argue, that if he's telling us to feel high and continue to return to feeling high, then that's absolute trash. That will destroy you, especially if you're already heavily depleted on the vitality side of things. I look at it like this. Intensity from his terms to me related to "drama" more or less. That can thematically relate to ANYTHING, but "drama" is more or less how I'd explore it. A vision that you're continuing to fixate on and unfold WITH INTENSITY. That's how I've ALWAYS "manifested" things I wanted. That to me is proven to be "the law".

"Now he said, “As the man said this, I must have entered into the spirit of that young man because I felt the embarrassment. I felt the feeling that this is unworthy…I’m not really worthy of all this because it was so easy. I only did what I ought to have done a long time ago. So I must have entered at one little moment from the disembodied observer to be the star in the drama. But then, I must have gone back to be to being the observer, because I heard him say it. Yet in it, it was not a vicarious thrill…I was actually experiencing the thrill. I entered into the state. So my rehearsal at night went right into the actual act, only it seemed to be that I am observing someone else.” Well, let me tell him, there is no one else. Humanity is a single being…in spite of its myriad forms and faces, and there is only in such seeming separation as we find in our own being when we are dramatically sundered in dream. So he was dramatically sundered and then a seeming other is playing the part that he wrote for himself. He played it. I can only tell him now, wait patiently, it’s done! You entered into a fourfold vision. Brought it right in through your own intensity when you spent the day on Tuesday constructing the scene which would imply the fulfillment of your dream, and rehearsed until the voices began to come alive, and the scenery became alive. Then at night you started it all over again and half-way through you fell asleep…as we are here asleep dreaming this." - BlakeL four types of vision 1968

So here's he's telling us that you continue to rehearse a play, a drama as I'd call it, until you become one IN the play as an actor or character that's been case to be in that role you've set for yourself. That's how he's pretty much explaining it. Now let me be clear, once again, if you're heavily depleted you will probably not be able to do this, because there needs to be a sense of desire to even go all the way with it in the first place. That threshold needs to be reached for anything to transform. That's always been true in all cases I've ever studied.

"If you are going to do it, as my friend did it, with that same intensity, then you will not postpone it. Now he knows this law, because he’s applied it so beautifully time and time and time again. Yet we’re all careless when it comes to a problem. Here’s a problem…you could do it imaginatively, oh well, it will take care of itself. It will not take care of itself because we are the operant power, it doesn’t operate itself. I either operate it or it remains dormant. And if I don’t practice every day…if I were a great concert pianist and I didn’t practice every day and then suddenly I’m called upon to give a concert, I am not ready. If I expose my playing before those who look forward to something great, I’m going to ruin my career. I must keep it day after day and practice. So when I am faced with a problem, I can’t put it aside and say, oh well, I’ll take care of that in time if it’s a problem. So having postponed it for months, he suddenly decided to do something about it, and he did, and moved from “soft Beulah’s night” into fourfold vision.

So when he said, “And now a fourfold vision is with me…and a fourfold vision is given to me” then he confesses that his greatest ecstasy is always in fourfold vision. So that’s fulfillment in scripture. Blake was a tremendous student of scripture. As you read in the 13th chapter of the Book of Proverbs, “Hope deferred makes the heart sick, but a desire fulfilled is a tree of life” (verse 12). And so if I really want something, well now, don’t just say, well, it will come. It’s not going to come! That’s simply hope deferred and it makes the heart sick. But if I know that imagining does create reality, I’ll do something about it. I will take these lovely images and let them interweave, and so construct them that when I bring that scenery into my mind’s eye it is implying something. Its implication is its power. What does it imply? Well, here in this case the young man is being congratulated because something of a major, of a most important thing has happened in his life. They only just heard about it and they came to congratulate him, and he thought it was so easy to do it that really this is not right. “You’re congratulating me for something that was so easy, so simple and really I only did what I ought to have done a long time ago”…the very thing that he constructed. Because in his letter to me, he said, “I knew it was a frustrating problem, yet I did nothing about it imaginally hoping that it would just go away or solve itself.” Well, it doesn’t.

Like here tonight as I look out, a friend of mine who had a few little skin cancers on his face, and his doctors could give him no more radiation and told him so, “You can do no more about it.” And every day you are confronted with your image as you shave. So he looked into the glass and here is his face staring at him with these skin cancers, and yet as he is looking at it, he has to imagine that they are not there. When they actually disappeared he doesn’t even know, but they left no trace of ever having been present. Well, I have looked at his face as closely as my eye will allow and there isn’t the slightest sign they were ever on his face. Here he has been given all the radiation that the skin could take, and his doctors said we can give you no more, sorry, and the only thing that I really could suggest would be an operation…just to have this thing removed by surgery. Well, he said, “I couldn’t go through it. So every day as I shave I am faced with the actual fact…but it isn’t, just isn’t there.”

So, Imagination cannot only bring things into being, they take things away. It can uncreate whatever it created."

Here's another quote from the same lecture, just expanded. He's giving us typical examples of there being ignoring of the things in the world, to just feel as though they're not there, like a child playing make believe.

"There are people in this world whose surface veneer appears to be altogether wonderful, but below that surface, there is an intensity and they do not know that they are only hurting themselves. She can’t touch me, although undoubtedly she has tried; but if she did it would boomerang in a way she would not know. I love her dearly, but she is intense and also of the same school that if you are not of a certain physical background you are not “in.”" - enter the dream 1969

Well would you look at that. Here's the "boomerang" thing from as far as 1969. What boomeranging is is that when you imagine something bad for another person then you'll get the effect of that back at you. He's talked about this in his early books but also in later lectures and there's other incidents where he talks about the boomerang effect but doesn't use this term. For example, the guy who got stuck in a woman's body for 6 hours apparently because he imagined her doing things that would imply she's not with the 3P. Florence Shinn told someone who wanted a lover with a 3P to send the 3P love. Interesting overlaps in principle.

"So, as the days went by, I said to him, “Ab, I am no nearer to Barbados than I was when I spoke to you.” And he said to me, “If you are in Barbados, you cannot discuss the means of getting to Barbados. You must actually live in Barbados in your imagination as though you were there . . just as if . . and view the world from Barbados. If you sleep in Barbados and view the world from Barbados, the means will appear, and you will go to Barbados. But as far as I am concerned, you are already in Barbados, because you desired it with intensity. All you had to do was simply to enter it; and you enter it now in New York City even though it is two thousand miles across water, . . and you aren’t going to walk across water; but you enter Barbados and view the world from it. If you see the world from Barbados, then you have to be in Barbados.”" - Gifts bestowed by God - unknown date

So here's one of him talking about intensity again, except he's talking about DESIRED it with INTENSITY. I can agree here, because desire is the heart activation. In order to activate "phase conjugation" you NEED to have that shen activated, but also anchored in the yin. Metaphysically this requires us to hold a strong foundation of yin to bind the shen in the blood of the body for the seed to be impregnated as NG says, To move current in a direction of intensity, that's necessary. You're weak and impotent otherwise.

"There is no difference between divine imagining and human imagining save in the degree of intensity of the two. When you and I are born anew, it means an expansion of the same power, which is imagining, and we rise to higher and higher and higher levels." - Law/storytelling/picture taking 1965

Strange lecture name. Here he tells us that the intensity actually determines the level of operation. He literally just said that intensity makes you enter divine imagination. So if intensity is the trick then that would mean that having a powerful basis of vitality is what separates human imagination to divine imagination. Did I just open up ANOTHER pathway to study in his work? Is this actually something he taught as a principle? I've never heard of this. Human imagination. This is why I've not put together the program yet, because there's STILL MORE to study.

"Now to the 1,260 days. On July 20 of the year 1959, my day was normal. I lectured in the morning to a large audience in San Francisco. Calling my wife around 9:00 P.M., I read the Bible and a bit of Blake and retired about 11:00 P.M., expecting nothing other than a normal, restful sleep. At 4:00 in the morning, a vibration centered at the base of my skull began to increase in intensity until I thought I would explode from the force of it. I am not a doctor, but I have read of massive brain hemorrhages and thought I was having one. I couldn’t conceive of living through this experience, yet I was unable to arrest it. Then I began to awaken, to discover that I was completely sealed within my own skull. I had but one consuming desire, and that was to get out of it. Intuitively knowing that if I would push the base of my skull something would give, I did, and something rolled away as I came out inch by inch just as a child emerges from the womb of a woman."

So here we have NG talking about the "explosion" in his skull. Why do I reference this again? Well think about this. If he's talking about feeling something in his body, literally feeling sensations that would be like physical pains of brain hemorrhages, then that would imply that the physiology DOES have meridian systems that relate to the "imaginal body" more or less. We KNOW from TCM and every other branch of behavioral science and related fields of biochemistry and such, that your moods depend almost entirely open the function of the inner biology. It also goes for the other way, though stimulation of that expansion needs to take place.

May I make a suggestion. Being functional, being vital, being well nourished and having clear circuits, this is what enables and opens up this function to work but since 95+% of us are all heavily depleted then this innate function cannot work effectively from an inner level. Thing is that from the data I have, pretty much every example by which expansion takes place will usually bring about satisfying manifestations which never had any inner intense imaginal act tied to it, or even a feeling of something on any of those related levels. It was pretty much just someone making functional decisions to nourish their vitality. That may in extension kick the ripeness up, and the alchemist has said that ripeness is a pretty close measure of "flow". Naturally moving through expansion in ways that are necessary to move pressure. The law and this almost always overlap to some degree, and there's almost no proof that the so called law operates outside of that, and the outlier experiences can typically be chocked up to something related to expansion causing it. My past experiences of having extremely functional biochemistry, even more than now, tell me that the so called law DOES exist as it's taught, because I can tell you that I manifested things I never felt worthy of at baseline really many times because I kept imagining them to happen and felt "good" about them. Thing it I was also doing hours and hours and hours of dynamic gazing back then too. I know that I had an insane amount of subconscious space back then and so the yin aspect was potent, and it seems my heart was highly active as well. I never experimented with this LOA stuff much back then though, and usually when I did try it I ended up with nothing. It was almost always when I was just being me and enjoying my time and had those "fleeting" type thoughts that "felt" good as well along the side. I wouldn't say intensity or drama was the right word, but there was a sense of comfort there for sure, even though looking back at how I operated I was still heavily compromised. That's my experience from the past, manifesting SPs and all that without trying and without seeing myself worthy of those interactions, yet they happened, often in ways that were even better than I imagined with how they spoke to me and how stimulating that was. It was just crazy even now looking back some of the things I was told by them. Very very "strong" things that imply attraction, let's just say that. I'm talking more than just passive comments, but like hard and fast "I need you now" type stuff, like FULL ON THIRST. That's the kind of things I never expected to hear. It's just wild stuff. Looking back once again, the only thing I can see that could've made that work, outside of common sense implied involvement type stuff and thematic availability given my environment, was more or less my vitality being top tier for a while. I was INFINITE in vitality back then no joke.

"This platform is concerned only with the great secret of life. Here we are convinced that the Supreme Power that created and sustains the universe is Divine Imagining, and it does not differ from human imagination save in degree of intensity. So God-in-man is your wonderful Imagination; that is God." - that which has already been 1959

Here's another example of human imagination vs divine imagination being the difference of intensity. This can make sense alchemically based on the eternal state of expansion you're operating from. So if intensity is about expansion of the inner states that are eternal, the substances, then "vibrating" on a higher level, operating more FROM the subconscious body, that would likely necessitate that you'll have that power available. Again, all the advanced theurgy work I've done and have had others do wouldn't reveal this to be the case though based on outcomes. It's typically visions and such that happen, where certain intelligences will show up in lucid dreams and you'll interact with them and they'll tell you things. That's very different though from what NG is discussing here. The whole divine imagination thing has to have something related to that though, and intensity I'm almost certain has to do with the amount of subconscious expansion you can live from and in at baseline, which relates to what I did years back with all the dynamic gazing I did daily and how I was operating on that level all the time.

"So make your image and ask no one to help you, for like the wake of the ship it will change the whole world, if it is necessary to the fulfillment of your drama. “Everything in the Pacific had to encounter that wake; nothing could stop it.” You are the ark of God and what you are imagining is influencing all the others who are also imagining. So Imagination changes things. Do not base it on facts. Truth as we see it is not confined to facts but depends only upon the intensity of Imagination. Everyone can do it . . but often reason will interfere. A friend told me tonight that he desired the answer to a certain problem and it was given to him. He said: “I prayed to the being within me.” It was a financial picture and he got the answer, but it seemed so stupid he did not apply it. Although he did share in it, it brought about everything that he desired. Reason interfered and he did not put his money into a certain venture. Reason stands between the man of sense and the man of Imagination." - same lecture

So here's NG telling us that we ARE the ark, and that others are also imagining. Everyone is you pushed out isn't that you are the only person on earth that thinks, that's insane. People who teach that are totally dissociated and likely narcissistic. He then goes on about the intensity. Let me find the root words of intensity.

"early 15c., of situations or qualities, "great, extreme," from Old French intense (13c.), from Latin intensus "stretched, strained, high-strung, tight," originally past participle of intendere in its literal sense of "stretch out, strain" (see intend). From 1630s of persons, "high-strung." Related: Intensely; intenseness."

This is the root. So it's to strain or stretch. Well "tension" is what N.Tesla used to define what we now call voltage in his day which is a condition of polarization of the aether, or the body of God. My ancient hypothesis that wave mechanics applied to manifestation phenomena I still believe in to some extent but I can't prove it.

"If you are with us for the first time, this is what we believe and teach here. We firmly believe that you, the individual, can realize your every dream, and the reason is that God and man are one. We believe that the difference is not in the mentality with which we operate, but only in the degrees of intensity of the operant power itself, and that we call human Imagination."

"We say that the Imagination of God and man are one, no matter how far it goes. Universes are created and sustained by “the same power that sustains our environment.” We say the power is the same, but we recognize a vast difference between the power that sustains the universe and that which sustains an environment. The difference is only in the degree of intensity of the center of imagining. So, if we increase the intensity [in] the center of imagining, we will create greater and greater things. So I see my dream, and I must learn to die to what I AM in order to live to what I want to be."

So both of those quotes are from the art of dying 1959. These relate once again to intensity.

"Here is this wonderful story of William Butler Yeats. He said, “I thought intently of a fellow student. I had a message for him, but I hesitated to write this message. Two days later I got a letter from a place several hundred miles away. In the letter he said to me, ‘You appeared suddenly in a very large gathering of people in a hotel where I am, and I said to you, because of the crowd, would you please leave now and return later.’ And he said to me in the letter I vanished, but I did return at midnight and gave him the message I had intended to give him, that I would not commit to writing. Now said he…Wm. Butler Yeats in his essays called The Essence of Good and Evil and this is the section called Magic. You can buy the book or rent the book, go to the library and read it…it’s under the caption Magic. He said, “I have no knowledge whatsoever of that visit. I do remember that I desired intensely to give him a message. I also know I hesitated to commit it to writing. But I have no knowledge of my visit to him and no knowledge of my appearance and my return to give him the message, but he enclosed in his letter to me the message.”

Now, is that not Imagination? What did it? He’s thinking of a friend. He intensely desires to tell him something, which he doesn’t write, but he has no knowledge that he appears seemingly to the friend in bodily form, as solidly real as though he were in the flesh. I have done it dozens of times to those who wrote me…I appeared to them. By some intensity of Imagination I appeared to them and they saw me. At the moment I didn’t have any knowledge. I have a few where I do recall deliberately doing it, with my sister and with a few others, but with the majority it was all done without any conscious knowledge of my projection in space and time. But it was still all Imagination. So you are influencing every being in this world to play the part they must play to bring to birth what you are imagining." - the art of imagining 1965

Here's NG saying that the intensity generated a bilocation experience of someone. This correlates to the subconscious capacity that I have talked about relating to how "much" of your aetheric body you can live FROM and project. There's even NG talking about "conscious knowledge of my projection in space and time" here, and he's talked about astral projection before too. All of this validates the idea that there ARE aetheric forms we have that ARE the subconscious body itself, or the "imagination"/divine imagination.

"Leave the good and evil and eat of the Tree of Life. Nothing in the world is untrue if you want it to be true. You are the truth of everything that you perceive. ‘I AM the truth, and the way, the life revealed.’ If I have physically nothing in my pocket, then in Imagination I have MUCH. But that is a lie based on fact, but truth is based on the intensity of my imagination and then I will create it in my world. Should I accept facts and use them as to what I should imagine? No." - the law 1959

Here's him talking about the intensity of the imagination again. He's then said that the difference between "human" vs "divine" imagination is intensity, and thus operating from a place of higher eternal state expansion seems to relate here again. Children aren't fully separated from those elements and so they're more open, at least that's what the alchemist told me as to explain why they're able to astral project and such so easy.

"So, listen to the words, “Take delight in the Lord, and he will give you all the desires of your heart. Commit your way (that is, your action) to the Lord; trust in him, and he will act.” So I did it. I assumed that I am in New York City. I am looking out on the world proving that I am in New York City, for were I in New York City I would see the world from New York City. So I saw it from New York City. I didn’t think of New York, I thought from New York, and slept in it. And that very night he acted. My intensity was so great, suddenly the paper comes before my face, he scratches out “Disapproved,” he writes in “APPROVED,” and then he speaks to me directly. Having said to me, “That which I have done I have done,” now believe it. “Do nothing.” And if you have ever gone through this you’ll know that it is the most difficult thing in this world when you are so anxious, to do nothing. And yet, there are moments as it was in my case when it was the only thing to do, to do nothing. And so I did nothing. And then, I didn’t appeal, he calls me nine days later and here I am that very day on a train to New York City."

Now notice when he talks about the whole "My intensity was so great, suddenly the paper comes before my face, he scratches out “Disapproved,” he writes in “APPROVED,” and then he speaks to me directly. Having said to me, “That which I have done I have done,” now believe it. “Do nothing.”, he's talking about God, the puppet master, forcing open NG's imaginal senses to have this experience and it happened THROUGH him. He didn't consciously manifest this. His INTENSITY was what drove the RIPENESS to have this happen. That's what manifested the experience, it was "ripe" to happen through facing the lessons and trials. Notice he also talked about anxiety as well. The alchemist has in fact talked about this in many cases being "pre-cognition" and not your conscious will creating anything, and that since you're aware of something you'll often try to change it if you don't like it but that will always fail in the end since God is playing the roles of everyone and everything in your experience. In the case of NG, it was pre-cognition as a matter of ripeness. He COULDN'T do anything, obviously. These movements ARE RARE, so I still continue to say it's very ignorant of NG to push this story as an example of a success to prove the so called law because he had nothing to do with it from a conscious will aspect. Intensity here relates to the will to expand more or less, the will to see yourself in a higher ideal, and the implication of that would overlap the sensory details, but the sensory details are within the seed of what the expansion and intensity represents you'll experience. This is the secret of pathway cascade mechanics and the whole "his ways are past finding out" as NG has said.

"The prophets equate the Rock with the Lord God Jehovah. This I know to be true. One day I sat in the silence, when quartz appeared before my vision. As I watched, the rock fragmented into numberless pieces and instantly molded itself into the human form, seated in the lotus posture in profound meditation. As I realized I was looking at myself, the form began to glow. It increased in intensity until it reached the limit of translucency. Then it exploded and my vision came to its end. Now I know I AM the Rock that begot me." - mystery of inspiration 1969

Once again another example of his intensity being related to "vibration" WHICH IS AN OVERLAPPING OF HIGHER ORDER STATES. Taking his words at face value without a proper context in alchemy makes this impossible to interpret. Visions and all that stuff come through you when you're expanded and ripe for that to happen, as I said before. You don't do anything except surrender to it. Advanced gazing can force this to happen if you're consistent with it.

"Not having had anything wrong with my head prior to this, you entertain the thought, because the whole thing is simply intensifying, and your head becomes more and more vibrant, and you cannot arrest it. You can’t stop it, and it increases in intensity, and when it reaches the apex of intensity, there is an explosion. And all of a sudden, standing before you is the David . . not a David, but the David of Biblical fame. And he looks at you, and you know he is your son and he knows that you are his Father. Here you are, admiring and drinking in the beauty . . sheer beauty. You can’t describe the beauty of David. People have tried to paint him. There is a sculpture called “The David”; it can’t come near the David . . that living reality . . that comes before you!" - the pattern man 1968

Another example of intensity being subconscious expansion and the likes which opens up mystical type experiences.

"Dwell upon this and you will find David, he who was anointed with the destiny of lordship. Samuel was told to “Rise and anoint him.” Taking the holy oil, he anointed David in the midst of his brothers, and from that day forward David never lost a battle. Although David did everything man is accused of doing, the Lord never condemned him because David was always doing the Lord’s will. It was the Lord who said: “I have found in David, the son of Jesse, a man after my own heart who will do all my will.” Everything is the will of the Lord. “As I have willed it, so shall it be. As I have purposed, so shall it stand. My spirit will not turn back until I have executed and accomplished the intents of my mind. In the latter days you will understand it perfectly.”"

There's so many examples of NG talking about "all my will" relating to the will of God in his lectures too.

"So, “I have found in David, the son of Jesse, a man after my own heart, who will do all my will.” So he is called the “servant”; but in the end, he is called the “Son.” He actually, now, has returned and become one. But standing before him is the one that he put through all the paces." - consigned to disobedience 1971

Here is NG talking once again about David. He's talked about David being the "sum total of all your experience" or something like that before. Here he's calling David the servant, the slave of God, who is "put through all the paces" by the will of the Lord. This doesn't sound like "free will" does it. It comes through you. "Only God acts". That's how this works.

"Yes, I gave it up as the son of God, and took upon myself this garment, and became a servant, a slave, and was crucified upon this garment called the “cross,” and made myself of no reputation, and became obedient unto death . . even death on this cross, and went through all the horrors of the world; and He called me, then, His servant. But in the end, when I have completed the work that I came to do, the cross is taken off, and I arise, and I AM the very Being, for I rose from the son to that of the Father.

But because I AM Father, there still must be a son to bear witness to my fatherhood, and he stands before me, and he’s David: . . the sum total of all my human experiences, but this time glorified. He doesn’t miss anything. His eyes are perfect, as told in the Book of Samuel: “beautiful eyes, clear complexion,” . . everything about him is perfect. You could not improve on the beauty of David. Not a thing is missing when you look upon him and see your son. And you certainly put him through the paces. You tore his eyes out when he was born blind. You took from him the capacity to speak. You took from him the capacity to hear. All these things you took, and he had to obey you, just as this lady had to obey this simple current pulled by a man." - same lecture

This is more proof of what I said. When he's talking about all of this he's talking about actual non dual theology where you're the higher I AM in capacity but also the servant here being moved through intuitive impulse and such. Feeling drives the form, and that's supplied by God. The beauty of David is the aetheric body revealed to you I believe. Once again notice that NG is differentiating between the father as I AM and you as the servant. You are God IN CAPACITY. The Christ child is being begotten and David is that man.

"The dreamer in you is God. It is he who is the source, the cause of your life. Dream fervently! Dream with intensity! Use the recorded techniques such as, “Come close, my son that I may feel you.” You can, by a spiritual sensation, persuade yourself that you are experiencing something physically." - the source 1968

Here's him talking about intensity again, but also spiritual sensation as well, as the sense of "the reality of experience" as I've called it.

"And then often those to whom the secret is revealed begin to use it wrongly. They discover Imagination creates Reality, and disliking someone they will imagine something bad and by their very intensity, bring it to pass. You can use this in a horrible way, so we are told he repented or was deeply concerned as to the consequences of his act." - the study of Judas 1959

This is actually a very interesting statement. It's not talking about the boomerang effect, since it's something bad about someone else that makes it happen to them instead of you. So this actually validates what he said in his earliest book where he talked about the need for the person to subconsciously accept what's being imagined for them. Is this not true? Remember this is right around when he had the whole "birth from above" which was in July, and this lecture above was from April. Some could argue that he changed that teaching but I've yet to find evidence of this once again.

Alright so I've done more and more and more digging and there's something to this. The idea that expansion = ability to "work" the law has many quotes from NG that would support this. I mean this is the traditional alchemical view on this anyway too so. Alright so there's like a spectrum here of expansion as self that we can go over. There's NG when he talked about the promise being required to work the law as he describes. Now remember how NG said that many people in his audience he knows who have had experiences of the promise and have fulfilled various passages in scripture. He makes many passive comments that you'll read. They're even in older lectures too, not just post 1959. So when someone is sufficiently expanded, as in their connection with the subconscious itself is greater which is the substantive body of the aetheric "imagination" body or divine imagination, then you'll be "closer" to the end of the play and more close to the acceptance of the true power. He has talked at times about this where we don't have much of the power we could otherwise have, and that only at the "end" of the play that we will have this power for us to use the law easily. There's another quote about him saying this too I can reference if I can find it. There's at least 3 I can reference.

"Now suppose, having arrested the activity within you, you change their intentions and . . releasing the scene with the changed motivation . . you discover that they move under compulsion to fulfill that which they now think they initiated. Do you realize that with this power you could cause them to commit suicide and think it was what they wanted? Like the lemmings, you could make them run towards the ocean, enter beyond their depth, and drown. That’s what you can do with this power; but it will not be yours until you are first incorporated into the body of Love!" - infinite power 1968

There's him telling us that he can basically make people walk off cliffs and kill themselves if he wanted to. Now look carefully. "but it will not be yours until you are first incorporated into the body of Love!".

"Although your power here is like a little firecracker compared to your real power, when you know what you want and believe you have it, your power of belief will make it so. Construct a scene which implies the fulfillment of your desire. Give it all of the sensory vividness you are capable of giving, and rest in the knowledge that its implication is the power to bring your desire into your world." - power and wisdom 1968

So here he's talking about your power being like a firecracker compared to the real power, which is when you're attained the immortality.

"So this body, . . you put it through hell, may I tell you? But you put it through hell to learn certain lessons. For we are told, “the Law is spiritual.” But man does not know the Law is spiritual until he has gone through all these fires of experience, and then he discovers that it is spiritual; and in the end, when the whole thing unfolds within him, THEN the Law becomes easy for him to operate, . . BUT NOT UNTIL THE END. For we are told: “God has consigned all men to disobedience, that he may have mercy upon all.” He “has consigned all men to disobedience, that He may have mercy upon all." - consigned to disobedience - 1971

This right here once again backs up what I said before about the whole needing to complete the expansion, or at least become MORE expanded. More God. You are a container for God, and the more individualized you are through the lessons we need to learn (which I've quoted earlier in the notebook I believe for proof) then the more we will house this real power. This real power is our capacity that's innate, the seeds within us that through transformation of our innate states, they unfold into the higher order substances which we gain access to in overflow as I've talked about. Nourishing vitality. This whole LOA space has totally failed to interpret all of this work, and misses the necessity for meaningful expansion WHICH IS IN FACT IN HIS WORK, as I've pretty clearly proven at this point. I too was wrong about this in the beginning. I didn't have the few quotes that prove he did teach determinism of greater process with me back then, either through my own failure to study his work deeply enough (most of the early lectures I went through back in the day were audio and the rest were read) and so now that I've created my own study tool it's making it much easier.

"Now I want to clarify a few points. In the Book of John this statement is made: “His voice you have never heard, his form you have never seen, neither does his word abide in you because you do not believe him whom he has sent.” Many of you have completely accepted the fact that I have been sent. You believe me when I tell you that I stood in the presence of the Risen Lord, who embraced me and I became one with. Having been incorporated into the body of Love, Almighty God sent me to tell my experience. Having accepted my words, many of you have had a sexual experience with me, in vision, and have interpreted this to be a physical experience on this level; but it is not, as this is a shadow world. Your acceptance brought about this union, yet I . . the speaker . . am totally unaware of it. The true story of Christ which I have brought you has now been made alive in you. It will erupt in time and your experience of scripture will be identical to mine." - a movement of mind 1969

Now just notice how EVERY TIME he mentions spiritual experiences they're always very intense and often very pleasurable, including the so called crucifixion with the vortices on his body. It's that pleasure from a pseudo satisfaction perspective coming from the drive to reduce pressure to transform and feel less of that expanding current, that's what he's talking about. The "vibrations" from a higher state. Believe it or not the alchemist has discussed that term with me before on a call we had like a month back or so and he said that when you apply a technique he's given me that I've not shared here that when you feel the "vibrations" that's the purifying light. There's a term in scripture that relates to it too but I can't remember, Point is that when you're expanding your consciousness by exposing yourself to more starlight on an inner level, provided that outer level implied involvement has reached the threshold of overflow, then you'll especially be able to feel this. You bathe in it, and it feels like "peace", but also tingly in a subtle way, almost as though you're turning into a different phase of being or something. It's not what I'd call "intense" though advanced gazing can be VERY VERY VERY intense when it happens with the quickenings, this was very gradual and smooth and peaceful, almost like I was totally "ok" in life for that time. I didn't seek it, I just allowed it to come over me when it was ripe. That's what it does, It's another means of accelerating the fulfilment of the promise, ripening until we fall from the tree like ripe fruit ready for harvest. Our entire expansion is like the seedtime and harvest parable too. Then you've got seedline doctrine which sees the physical level manifestation of this and the manifestation of "good" and "evil" on earth and the cycles throughout time that represent the script of the play. There's so many levels to scripture.

The deeper level of what NG is getting at here is that until you're ripe enough, which is an expansion measurement of how real you are as yourself and how individuated you've become through meaningful transformation, that opens up the power of the so called law to work "easier" for you AS AN EFFECT. So when you look at it with common sense terms, being real ANYWAY will open up the power of the so called law regardless since that's integration of who you are and that will unfold through you no matter what since that's ripeness in motion.

The law requires the promise it seems. The law isn't above or outside the promise. It's a progression of capacity that's manifest THROUGH the law as that capacity expands. The law stays the same the whole time but as you expand you become more individuated and you operate according to who you are to unfold the innate seeds, thus the law works. NG has talked about activating seeds as well, which would align with RS. I use to think I was in conflict with his teaching on this but the more I read the more I see that there MIGHT be a correspondence between RS and NG LOA, correctly interpreted that is. The morons who preach that everyone has the same power just isn't supported by NG. When NG talks about using the imagination more, it's for overlapping purposes, which is what the alchemist teaches with gazing and other methods I've applied. When you overlap states more, meaning the eternal states, then you'll create the substances in effect that lead you into embodying more of your divine imagination at baseline, which IS individuation since you're taking the sun up into the earth and purification occurs on the higher level where there's greater supply of starlight. You take the lesser yang INTO the higher yin as a container to transform what otherwise wouldn't be able to stand in that level. The subconscious must expand to be able to house the sun for that process to take place, and as we work in lab alchemy we do the same thing. This once again proves mentalism is insanely stupid.

Your biochemistry matters a lot to success. I just can't make that more clear. It's not like the deal breaker but it matters a lot, a lot more than you'd think, to a certain threshold of efficiency that is.

I've also considered this as an important factor too. Listen carefully. People who are alone and can't sleep well often have heart heat, liver heat, or yin deficiency causing empty heat. Many, not all, but many, will have difficulty actually properly relaxing. PROPERLY relaxing. This is what Wilhelm Reich often discussed as why most people experience psychosis, and from a TCM level that's correct in many cases. Unconscious agitation, most often stemming from a total lack of meaningful connection to being seen and that means you can't properly relax. My oxytocin explanation from before relating to the heart kidney axis as tension is released, that matters. The thing with the inability to relax properly is you'll always be wired to constantly be needing to work, but it's actually not needed as often as you feel stimulated to do so. You'll think it's intuitive impulse but in fact it's agitation driving it, which once again I've talked about the difference many times before. The field geometry is ALWAYS self regulating but trusting it is the challenge. So this is often the case especially for zooms like those who read this, who have nobody to physically turn to for actual relaxation to occur that will trigger the release of oxy that relaxes the body properly. Now I've not done tons of study into ways you can get this to work reliably without having someone there who ACTUALLY loves you (attracted to you and is stimulated by you being there with them as an assurance for a vitality supply) but what I'll suggest is to recall times in your life when you actually did feel that oxytocin release. That "seen" and "heard" and "felt" and "loved" sensation of "it's ok now". Your best bet to stimulate that release without someone there is to bring those times up, and HOPEFULLY (I can't prove this to validate nor do I have data on it) release the relaxing hormone. It's almost all hormonal, I swear. SO obviously looksmaxxing will only benefit you with this regard because having someone there who you consider trustworthy and such to relax with that you've got with you regularly will help you sleep better, which is EXTREMELY important. I will once again say this isn't necessary but in many cases I will argue that the MOST POWERFUL way to resolve heart fire and such is through meaningful touch and connection on that physical level. Why are so many zooms anxious like crazy? Pathogenic heat, agitation, heart fire, liver fire, unresolved conflicts are one big cause but the effects are that they're more socially disregarded every day and until they begin to restore connection with those sensations and expand where it's available then they'll forever down spiral. The solution is almost always the same, throw away the trash you've adopted from others and relax in the acceptance of "I never needed this in the first place". That's what we all have access to as a starting point, getting real with how you feel. From there expand your vitality in meaningful ways and get socially involved with people who resonate with your vision and are stimulated by your vitality to then transform that into connection that benefits both parties.

The fact is that we need intensity that's moving in meaningful ways towards what's needed to expand but we also need relaxation, the dynamism is necessary for function. You CANNOT do this in a vacuum. So I will argue once again that most of this whole needless stimulation trash, as tough as it is to cut out, is necessary to get that second step moving forward to get the solutions moving for how you really feel underlying all the numbness from scrolling and depleting your vitality. That will open up the view of your life that's greater and drive satisfying expression that will also to a degree lead to relaxation at night, though not the same. So simply put, if you don't have anybody to be your supply of oxy then provide it for yourself wherever you can. Another person who loves you will trump any other method to a certain point I'd say but obviously when you've got limited options then you'll need another supply. I DO NOT buy that you can do it in your imagination. Yeah I know the fools will preach that the biochemical responses to something being real is like as though it was actually there if you "feel" it to be real, but I'll say GETTING THERE for someone who's hyper agitated like I was is effectively impossible in any reliable way. It's just not. It CAN be in SOME cases, but it's not reliable and you're far better off acting in meaningful ways that provides satisfaction, which is relaxation, not the same degree, but it's a step to that end result and that's the most reliable way to attain it. The small things can get you there too, it's not that it needs to be massive, though I'll always argue that going all the way leads you into that place of real satisfaction that's beyond anything else. I'll probably do some more study on this oxy release thing soon to work on that level to help those with heat issues.

Bleh I need to go harder. HARDER BETTER FASTER STRONGER. Cut harder. Reset and refocus.

Thumb pulling sucks but it's the only way. beW knows this too. Yeah you know.

Anyway this is all clear. The NG stuff that is. It's all there. Mostly.

Think about this variable too. Think about this. So what stimulated you into massive radical change in your life that you felt was needed? What was it that stimulated this response? Ask yourself that and look back and you'll find almost every time it was through comparison. Right? It was when you saw someone else satisfied when you're not. You're feeling agitated, and you want to relax. This is fundamental yin yang dynamics. You're seeking a means of feeling less agitation, less pressure, which we have ZERO control to stop. That's the promise in action. The promise is that immortality will always be available to us no matter what, through these mechanics. Dissatisfaction is necessary for expansion, cycles of expansion and then stabilization and then into another dissatisfaction cycle. If you truly expand then you'll be met with a new wave of pressure to face when that integration of the prior cycle has completed. At this point something in your life will pop up and will remind you of a lack. Now this isn't to meet another persons expectation, but because it's pulling out of you a dream or vision you had for an experience you wanted that's been compromised on this whole time ONLY until you saw that thing you don't have surface in consciousness did you recognize your life sucks still. It's not like it TOALLY sucks but it's simple another source of unresolved agitation. So it's the comparison to someone having what's thematically related to your vision for your life that reminds you of that current, and reminding yourself of that vision on a repeated basis is really a form of persistence. This is what happens especially if you're nourished. Knowing that your nourishment plays an integral role in satisfaction is necessary.

"Now listen to these words from the 4th chapter, the 6th verse of Philippians: Have no anxiety whatever. The words are, “Have no anxiety about anything, but in everything by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving make your requests known to God” or “Let all your requests be made known to God.” Have no anxiety about anything. So you ask something…you say, “Well, the doctor said so and so.” Well, I don’t care what the doctor said. Well, the boss said so and so. I don’t care what he said. I am told, “Have no anxiety about anything, but in everything by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let all of your requests be made known to God.” So you sit quietly and now you’re going to commune with God. Wait for God to tell you something? Don’t you know who God is? How must I wait for God to tell me something? God is speaking to me every time I use my Imagination; for God is all Imagination and dwells in me as my Imagination." - the power of faith 1964

Right here is a big thing that NG is saying about anxiety. Don't have anxiety. Well easier said than done right. How do you drop the anxiety? Recognize that you're not below the conditions, since this if you ask me is at least on a psychological comparison level the cause of anxiety. There's other causes too but in this sense practically it's because you're not a vitality match for what you're manifesting. You're not nourished enough to feel worth the thing pretty much. In my opinion, the most powerful way to dissolve anxiety is simply by going all the way into accepting and owning the movement into bringing your vision into reality in any means available to you. When you go all the way then you'll always feel satisfaction at the end because you're impotent at that point. You've learned the lesson and integrated those aspects that have been branched off to meet the expectations of others. That's where you really meaningfully attain expansion by which nourishment can take place without turning to cope. The thing that keeps most people stuck is the inability to handle the necessary pressure and cutting through the trash as it becomes conscious through involving in it. When you involve in what you want the conditions WILL surface, and if they don't then you've not gone all the way to surface them yet. When you're at that point, then saying screw that trash I'm doing what I want and becoming unrecognizable to the trash is how you destroy anxiety. Now unless you're seriously cripple like I was then this will always be available for you. I was at the level where simply hearing someone get even a little agitated would make me feel viscerally sick and need to go lay down or I'd like die or something. It was just torture. I had to live in a bubble and it sucked. So unless you're literally UNABLE To handle pressure because you're so depleted on nourishing yin then you'll be able to make this work to some degree or another and that will only compound.

It all depends where you are as to how far you can apply this stuff. Like that's why coaching is so helpful for so many because it's just the most direct way to get exactly what's needed from someone whos' been through the full spectrum.

I also want to state this. When you're so completely and totally expanded that you have immortal powers and such, to stop time as NG has talked about, then yes you can control anybody like a puppet and it won't matter. You will be so expanded that you are basically operating AS God, since you've completed the work and are one WITH God. God is housed IN you, AS you, transformed you INTO God. Yeah, I am sure that's going to be the case, you can and will almost invariably manifest whatever you imagine and life can and will be like a lucid dream since you're so insanely expanded that no force imaginable can stand against your will. You are FREAKING GOD! Thing is that when you're that expanded you'd have no desire to mess with the fabric of order here so it's stupid to assume you'd end up making people walk off cliffs like lemmings as he said. That's not the point, the point is functional expansion and individuation. Beyond that, it's simply existence in peace and with lucid dream like ability at baseline. You've taken all the fires and trials and learned all the lessons here (which NG did say remember) to which case you've gained natural access to that power in effect of expansion. It's something you cannot fake or bypass, it's a necessary function "for the work yet to be done in him". What we talk about in RS IS that work, that's the ONLY reason you exist here, to become an immortal God.

This is the ENTIRE function of your existence. Nothing else is there, and ALL the experiences here that happen to you are for expansion purposes. NG said you WILL face HORRIBLE things, "for the work yet to be done in him" and that is correct. You will face all kinds of trash but that's just how it works.

"So you are told, let me quote for you again, the 4th chapter, the 6th verse of Philippians, “Have no anxiety about anything”—-what a statement!—-“but in everything by prayer with supplication and with thanksgiving let all your requests be made known to God.” No anxiety about anything! Now comes letting your request be known to God. Well, my request is that John has a wonderful job, gainfully employed and moving up, expanding, month after month. So I meet John in my mind’s eye now, and John tells me he has the most wonderful job in the world. Well, that action was God. And so, he tells me; I react; I say “Amen” to that; the whole thing is done. I go to the end and then I don’t raise a finger to get John the job. I don’t call a friend and say, “You know John is in need of a job, can you help him out and steer him in the right direction?” I do nothing. I can’t put my hand upon that ark and steer at all. Let it be steered properly by the imaginal act, for the imaginal act contains within itself the power and the wisdom to externalize itself."

NG tells us that knowing our request was made to God is the way you kill anxiety. That's how it's done. I don't really agree with that obviously and I believe that this can only really work when you're at a certain level but for those that are at that point then have fun.

16/12/25

"We think we are sane when we believe in the evidences of the senses, when we believe in some mathematical state that proves itself in performance. He spoke of Blake as one who was a “real refugee from unbelief.” I tell you a fantastic story and you don’t believe it. Would that you would believe! Believe it, though reason would deny it and your senses deny it. Just to believe it and become a refugee from unbelief, because true religion cannot be analyzed. You can’t rationalize it; it is based upon these mystical experiences in the depths of the soul.

Blake said of the Bible: “The entire Hebrew Bible” . . he did not mention a few of the works. He didn’t mention Ruth, Nehemiah, and things of that sort, but he said: “The Five books of the Decalogue; the books of Joshua and Judges, Samuel , a double book, and Kings , a double book, the Psalms and Prophets, The Four-fold Gospel, and the Revelations everlasting.” (“Jerusalem,” Plate 48) He did not name the prophets, which he called the latter prophets (also the major): Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel. He said these are true vision. He did not mention the Epistles, but he said the four Gospels, Revelation, and the Hebrew Bible are eternal visions of what really exists. He saw it so clearly, that all these characters are personifications of eternal states and communed with these states, for when you commune with them they seem as real as you are. But they are personifications of God’s infinite mind; every aspect of his mind is personified. You are not an aspect of the mind, something entirely different. You are one with God. “Man is All Imagination. God is man and exists in us and we in him.” (“Annotations to Berkeley’s Siris”)

“The Eternal Body of Man is The Imagination, that is God himself; The Divine Body Jesus; we are his Members” . . part of the body of Jesus, and because there is only one name, we are he. So we pass through a process, a simple process which you can’t evoke, you can’t hasten it. But when you least expect it, divine mercy steps beyond and redeems man right into the body of Jesus. Then he passes through these stages, where he is born from above, where suddenly he beholds the divine Son [David] as his son; then the great woven structure of the body, the temple, is torn from top to bottom and he ascends to be one around this infinite throne of Jesus, who is God." - Blake on religion 1963

He talked about a "process", that bring the promise, the unfolding of innate capacity into immortality. He says that when we are "ripe", in the terms of the alchemist that is, then we are redeemed. We cannot be redeemed until God decides, and if God decides then that would mean it would be the perfect time. That means then I'd guess that our timing of events and how we come into contact with these things is pre-determined thematically. The alchemist has said this before that I've quoted somewhere as well.

My study today is mostly on the idea of ripeness in the NG doctrine. What determines the capacity by which we operate the so called law? That's what I'm looking to figure out because he's clearly said that we don't have full access to the power of the law "until the end", or until redemption. Until God chooses us and redeems us then we're in the process of transformation and the law is in part accessible for us to facilitate that transformation.

"If I could only go all out and believe in the reality of my imaginal act and not look back. Just go all out, and believe that things are as I desire them to be. But don’t look down now to my understanding to see if it is really happening, like pulling up the little seed to see if it is taking root. Really believe that it is going to take root and in its own way it unfolds within itself and grows. But don’t pull it up; walk right out in the belief that things are as I desire them to be, even though at the very moment it seems darker than ever. And if I do that, that is what Blake did." - same lecture

Interesting there. He's telling us to go all the way with the faith in the act, the implication to us. He's also talking about "pulling up the little seed" which is like "digging" up the seed that I've quoted somewhere before. So this thing about digging up seeds and looking at them is in fact a thing in the NG doctrine, meaning that through unbelief you can ruin a manifestation according to what this means. So faith and unbelief and such is a big part of recent study to find related passages that can provide greater context. I believe personally that this whole faith thing, faith in Christ, is more or less about living more from the subconscious level at baseline as I was saying before, looking THROUGH the world as gazing cultivates more or less. That sort of "detachment" through the shen being stable and thus not being excessively activated when trouble shows up to trigger you.

So belief ifs belief in your innate capacity as God, that you're above all the conditions of the world. You're activated and nourished knowing that it's a greater power innate moving you in life, more or less. True belief means you don't waver, meaning you're going to have a stable shen. I personally cannot see this whole belief in God thing being the driving force since tons of people who don't believe in that innate power or even know about it still get places. Look back in your life and you'll find tons of examples so it can't be taken literally like that. It's a principle of nourishment and operating from a higher place, regardless of the cosmology surrounding that. Personally this would be experienced as more or less a detached position towards the thing you're involved in. I see the whole seeing yourself as God thing and psychologically working the mechanisms we've talked about here by disowning others projections to be effectively the same thing when it comes to expansion, because the result is that you're operating more as self anyway, provided that the targeted result from seeing yourself as God above all the trash opens up the innate self to express instead of just feeding into another compromise pattern. I will argue once again as I said in my last video that having a personal basis for what conditions you're targeting and becoming unrecognizable to them for real is more effective since you'll be able to really dig into the involvement in a meaningful way instead of just doing it because you're trying to prove faith or something. Both work the same mechanism though so it really doesn't matter if they end up in the same result, though the way I teach it WILL be more reliable if data was gathered on effects I would 100% guarantee.

"Now, after the third temptation we discover the mind is at peace, and there is no more conflict within. There is no devil, no Satan . . only doubts. Doubt, in the mind of one who was born by the grace of God, gives God the feeling of impossibility. In Blake’s “Vision of the Last Judgment” he so wisely personified doubt, saying: “Satan thinks that sin displeases God. He ought to know that nothing displeases God but unbelief and eating of the tree of knowledge of good and evil.”" - God's almighty power 1968

There's the one thing that displeases God, unbelief and basically buying into the so called facts of life in the world.

"But this is not the only power and wisdom of God. In the greatest of all the New Testament, which is John, John does not emphasize the power. He states in the beginning . . yes, he declares might as power . . but the emphasis is not on power; it is on redemption and revelation. Revelation in John’s gospel is an act of God in self-revealing. So, in the first chapter he tells us what this power will do for us. First of all there are two endings to John. Let us take the real ending, which is the 20th chapter, the first ending, and whoever the writer is who calls himself John: “Now Jesus did many other signs that are not written in this book; but these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ . . .and believing have life in his name.” He is the power and the wisdom of God. That is what the author is telling us in the very end. Many signs he did, but in spite of the number of the signs and the character of the signs, it did not evoke faith. The whole teaching of the Gospel of John is based upon faith and unbelief in him. Either one or the other. Have faith in him, or you disbelieve in him, and few believed in him . . few, we are told, even his disciples. Only a few believed and they imperfectly." - Christ is your imagination 1963

So there's 2 endings to John huh.

"So what I’m getting at is this, she didn’t know that the structure…you see, God’s Word is literally true, but it’s conveyed to man in metaphor, in a figure of speech. And so, the words that will convey the Word, that’s a figure of speech, that’s ___(??). So when she constructed a scene in New York City and put me on the platform to tell her story, alright, I’m telling the story… that whole structure was all figurative. What did it imply? The potency of that structure was in its implication, not the structure. She could have taken any structure in the world. But what is the structure? It implies something. It must have meaning. For the Bible is, “In the beginning was the Word.” Well, the word logos means “meaning.” It must have meaning. So there was meaning with God in the very beginning. This is not an afterthought, this is not some emergency thinking. This is something that was prepared before the world was, and this meaning was with God, and this meaning was God.

So the whole thing has meaning. So I create the structure. Now, what does the structure imply? Its implication is the word, the truth that God is speaking. So if I am telling that she has $600 now more than she had before, it means she has $1,287. Now, Neville means nothing, the platform means nothing, all these things mean nothing, it’s the implication. That’s the potency of this structure. So forget structure. It’s marvelous because it conveys meaning. And so I have to use words to convey meaning. If I didn’t have to use words, I could just think and tell you the most marvelous things in the world. But while I’m limited to this world I’ve got to find words. And all the words are figures…even a simple little thing like “imagining creates reality.” Yet behind the three little words, what am I telling you? It’s so much I am telling you in that simple, simple little thing.

So here, we have belief this night. Our beliefs, our real beliefs, are what we live by, and our entire life is the outcome of our beliefs. If, like the father in the story, as related in the 9th of Mark, thought he believed and asked the great one to help his unbelief; then he tells him in a very simple manner “All things are possible to him who believes.” Now, throughout scripture, using the word “prayer,” “Teach us how to pray,” well, there is no reaction to that. There is no statement as to how. He did give us what is called The Lord’s Prayer. That’s something entirely different…it’s the most majestic. But to teach us how to pray…they said he was praying and when he ceased to pray in a certain place, they said to him, “Master, teach us to pray.” But no statement is made as to what he said. But if you will take a good concordance and look up the words and see what prayer means, the word prayer means “motion towards, accession to, in the vicinity of”—at or in the very place that you want to be." - same lecture

Here's him talking about implication more and about belief. Implication and meaning are likened to be the same thing in language effectively in this case of these quotes. The structure "of your mind" is another one he's talked about. So structure is arrangement, arrangement of mind, of the components of God, the "garden" that is the field geometry of all planted seeds that are unfolding and bearing fruit. So in this part of this lecture he's telling us what I've been saying since ages. Meaning, implication, that's what MOVES us, MOVES current, MOVES God. It's what in his words "ACTIVATES" the state, which in his terms is also a seed, a capacity. He also called the Christ child a seed as well. The "Christ seed" shows up many times in his work as well. We're going deeeeep with this one. NG here likened MEANING to BE God. Meaning is Christ, as he says. Logos. This is crazy I didn't even expect him to say it this way. "It's implication IS THE WORD" and the word as we know from John in scripture is Christ, or the POWER of God. The currents that move. NO DUH RS is on the ball before even confirming that from scripture or NG.

"Well, she wants to be in that place hearing her story. She got right into it. It’s all communion with self; it’s not on the outside. You don’t really pray here or pray in a church. It’s when you actually withdraw from the outer world. and go within, and then get nearer and nearer to the wish fulfilled. Well, I have to get nearer and nearer to the wish fulfilled…so I assume the feeling of the wish fulfilled and give it all sensory vividness, all the tones of reality, everything that would be real were it true. So I am hearing his voice. I hear… and now what is he saying, what does it mean, what does it imply? It implies that I have it. Well, then it awakens in her the reaction of having it. Believe that you have received it—it produces that feeling of having received it. That’s the end of the prayer: “Whatever you desire, when you pray, believe that you have received it.” Well, how to persuade myself that I have received what at the moment reason is denying and my senses deny? I use all this technique, and the technique is all figurative. Has no power whatsoever. It is what it is implying." - same lecture

"It awakens in her the reaction of having it", Right there. Boom we've got it. What he's telling us to do is move current. Obviously. That's what he described as seedtime. The WHOLE POINT of doing inner imaginal work really is more or less to "block out" the world so that you can form contextual basis to lead your pathways into activating where the innate truth is leading you and to when you "feel" the implication of what the inner experience means to you then you'll move the condition in importance and this will be faith in God. Is it not? Is this not how faith is established? Currents that illuminate us according to our correct innate nature. If sin is to miss the mark, to stay in suffering, then fulfilment and accepting innate self despite the conditions of the world is belief in him, because it transcends cosmology then and is simply operating according to the innate seeds of Christ that unfold through you. The Jing unfolding.

So if seedtime is the inner "motor response" that you feel and then if you persist in that assumption then you'll get it. So we know how to "seal a state" but how do we persist? This is where everyone goes way wrong. So NG talked about action being the test, physical action that is. He says that if you believe it then you won't want to act. I will argue that's not correct in all cases. In some cases, yeah, I can see that depending on what it is, but in most cases that's just not true. The business owner will work on the business. I need to work on this every day to make it happen, nobody will make this work for me since I'm the only one doing this work. I need to involve to unfold this, and that's fine. Point being that if action is the test of belief and faith as he's said before then that's an incorrect interpretation because it's not universally seen in all examples. We've figured out clearly about the whole activating the state and all those mechanics but what's the clearly explained mechanics of "persist" and such? Well if fear digs up the seed and unbelief pulls it out of the ground as he says then it would mean persistence is maintaining stability of assumption, stability of the Shen. Action or no action it doesn't matter. Stability of the vision being inevitable for you I will say is how this works and anything you can do to expand yourself into that position could only aid your belief would it not? I will argue that in some cases, you could explain his whole "don't lift a finger to make it so" under the perspective of those who don't have belief in it and are trying to "force" things as some in the LOA space say. I will say that this interpretation can make sense given where he's coming from and how he often makes these statements to the people who are new to this and will have assumptions in their minds about how this would work in a sort of suggestive correcting manner. "Don't lift a finger to make it so" is only encouraging their belief in it, and if they actually do and are naturally moved through the expansion then the action would happen no matter what anyway. So that's how I'd probably interpret that most clearly when it comes to how it would make sense in the most examples when it's applied. Obviously laying in bed all day and imagining isn't what he's talking about. That's just insane. He's preaching to a certain type of person who's got presumptions as to how to please God with faith, that they're doing it to please some expectation and not to move with the current. It's another psychological trick, because we KNOW it's not universally correct to "not lift a finger to make it so" especially in the elite athletics world where people obviously lift fingers on the daily and have their visions of being world class come true for the ones who make it to the top. No world class athlete imagines and sits around and shows up and breaks records. No chance. They will ALL have prior involvement to some degree or another and that will be what unfolds into the complete manifestation so we know that it cannot work if you interpret it at face value. It just can't, and the coaches and trash that want to validate their ignorance by certain cherry picked example case studies, then tell them to get stuffed and stop being such an illiterate fool wasting your time because they're obviously not critically thinking about any of these mechanics and only want your cash.

So above, NG tells us that the potency of structure is implication, and that's why I once again argue that the personalized approach where you see the conditions in the light they need to be seen in is THE WAY to do it since that's targeting the "feeling" most directly via implication which is the pathway cascade mechanics that I've spent almost 7 years now decoding. That goes way back to my original aetheric physics studies

"Well, now believe in his Word. It’s called in scripture, repentance. And so, she practiced repentance by not accepting the evidence of the senses and changing, a radical change of mind. So she didn’t have it, she’s not going to ask him for it, she’s going to try it. So in her mind’s eye she sets up a scene implying the fulfillment of her desire, and then the desire comes to pass. So that was repentance. She didn’t go to church, she didn’t go confess to some priest, she didn’t do anything in this world that the world calls repentance. Repentance means simply a radical change of mind, that’s what the word means. Metanoia is a complete radical change, not just a little change, right down to the root. I don’t know how it’s going to work, but I’m going to change radically. I’m not looking and hoping that it comes from this, that or the other; I just have it. And he’s telling my story and so I know. So she began to apply it. And when she saw me and thought now this whole thing is going to be simply farcical, it wasn’t. She didn’t realize that the power was not in the structure she had done, it was in what the structure implied." - same lecture

So right there at the end he says it again. NG literally said right here that the woman didn't even realize that the power was in what the imagined experience MEANS/IMPLIES about her. This is what I work with in coaching, by leading their pathways I tap into their structure that's already there to reverse engineer their implied unconscious conditions to extract the meaning and thus offer a solution to dissolve the importance on that unconscious condition. It works EVERY TIME. This is why I KNEW that this is how it works because of how reliable this method is. I've never had anyone not respond to this in ways that are transforming. NG clearly has said over and over and over that the imaginal senses themselves have no power, it's what it implies to you, means to you, that MOVES you, MOVES God, MOVES the current and thus arranges the pathway cascades according to the seed that you've activated. THIS IS INCREDIBLY CONSISTENT WITH WHAT RS HAS STOOD FOR SINCE DAY 1 BASED ON OBVIOUS FACTS ABOUT HOW THIS WORKS FOR ALL PEOPLE. So we've found it in his work, that the imaginal senses don't DO ANYTHING. It's RIGHT THERE, and in many other examples but this is far more clear. The feeling is the movement of current, the activation of seedtime and states, and that is implication moving current through the pathway cascades.

We've proven it, after so long. It's ALL THERE. I almost can't believe it's that clear. So how I've been approaching this the whole time was correct. Yeah I have refined bits over the years but this was always the essence. I used the "intuitive" sense to describe the feeling and "contextual sense" as well in the early early days with a lack of words to use but honestly implication is such a powerful term to use. The implication sense is the sense that activates the pathways and you "feel" the movement of that in the circuits.

"Until he is called, he is not sent. To be called is to be sent. When you are called and sent, you know it. Not speculating you know your mission. Even though you haven’t the intelligence of the world and you are unlettered in the language of the world, he tells you what to say. You go before the learned men of the world and people you call your own and tell them what mortal mind cannot tell them. You’ll tell them what they’ll never experience by reading books or by speculating, and you tell them exactly what has happened to you. They will look upon you as one, “Isn’t he the most wonderful dreamer. Isn’t his Imagination vivid.” Isn’t so at all…you simply are telling exactly what happened to you. But they can’t see the being that you are, because on this level when I depart this world, that is, when the world sees this level, they’re the same level. They’re still clothed in mortal garments that suffer and die… until that one moment in time when, after all the furnaces, they’re called into the presence of the living God and embraced, and fused, and then sent to tell the gospel of God. And we come one by one into that state. But, here, we walk the earth unknown, completely unknown, disregarded. You’re told in scripture, he reverses the entire thing. The one that he calls and holds the highest rank he ___(??). For he sends him, sends him into the world… no honors, no background, no intellectual, social, financial background whatsoever. He sent him, but he said, I go with him, for he who sees me sees him who sent me. But you can’t see him because the eye isn’t open to see him. So I tell you, believe what I’ve told you this night. It’s true you can be exactly what you want to be if you’re willing to construct a scene that would imply the fulfillment of your dream. And the power is not in the structure, that’s all figurative, that’s mental; but the power is in its implication. What does it imply? Remain faithful to its implication and it will come to pass in what the world calls reality."

Read that near the end? "It's all figurative" relative to the "structure" meaning the sensory level representation of the thematic currents. It's that CERTAIN thematic compositions of current MEAN something about you and your natural striving and OPENS UP EXPANSION when you ACCEPT it. NG was teaching EXPANSION doctrine not solipsism. Stupid me for originally assuming that, which I have obviously proven wrong which also proves the whole modern LOA idea to be whacked because I manifested proof AGAINST what I assumed, as we all do all the time since that's necessary for expansion. Being anything that you want is WHATEVER ACTIVATES THE CURRENT RELATIVE TO YOU. That's what I've always intuitively interpreted that to mean, not literally that you'll manifest actual insane superhuman ability just by imagining that but because to you what you imagine EXPANDS you by exposing you to more of God and that is the law in operation.

"So I tell you, believe what I’ve told you this night. It’s true you can be exactly what you want to be if you’re willing to construct a scene that would imply the fulfillment of your dream. And the power is not in the structure, that’s all figurative, that’s mental; but the power is in its implication. What does it imply? Remain faithful to its implication and it will come to pass in what the world calls reality."

I CAN DECODE THIS PERFECTLY NOW I KNOW EVERYTHING ABOUT EVERY WORD HERE. He is correct in this when interpreted correctly. That last sentence especially. He's telling us to create a representation of something that brings out of us the activating current that expands us, exposes us to more of God and thus closer to completing the "work yet to be done in him". He tells us to REMAIN FAITHFUL TO THE IMPLICATION! The implication. The movement of "this is my truth" and THAT proves that involvement CAN manifest it for us because it moves those currents as well in autosuggestion. It all works here. He's proven here what persistence means. Persist (remain faithful) TO its IMPLICATION. Implication is a pathway activation phenomena, intuitive impulse driven by greater process moving us intelligently. Remember that NG said we can dig up the seed and pull it out of the ground, so that means that denying intuitive impulse and conforming to conditions is not trusting or being faithful to God. The inner truth, the innate supply. IT'S ALL THERE. IT WORKS 100%! I almost can't believe it's this coherent it's crazy. This is NOTHING like what anyone else is teaching. This DESTROYS robotic affirmations and explains why you always get signs which will only manifest the lack feelings and imply you're not where you want to be. You're not trusting inner truth or anything you're staying in the box and trying to use "the law" to bypass meaningful transformation. Transformation and manifesting things are effectively one in the same process I will argue which it why it cannot be faked as well as why most clients who get results that I know often experience the same things I'm talking about because they go all the way.

I went from trying to destroy NG to supporting what he says, though that only came through years of in depth study of this stuff. You cannot take anything that these morons in this modern coaching space seriously because they're all delusional ignorant fools who only want your cash. They're not interested in meaningful expansion at all, else they'd be preaching this which has been the doctrine of RS since the start. This material is worth insane amounts because it takes down the multi billion dollar industry using his own words. All that work I did over the last few weeks putting together this study material that I can search for keywords has only made this 10000x easier.

The best thing that I can preach on videos is "you're worth the desire" type stuff more or less. They're not the MOST popular content but it's definitely far more palatable than the stuff I did last time that's going hardcore into the cold hard facts.

"I may not even remember having planted it, because memory comes afterwards. Memory comes when man begins to awake; the returning memory of the whole vast world is his. But until the child is born, memory is very short. We speak of total recall…I question it seriously. We speak of this one having a wonderful recall, alright, marvelous if he has a good recall. But does he recall not a passage in a book, not some little thing that he’s read, all that is marvelous, to train the mind to recall—but does he recall the moments in time when he planted the seed? The man who has some horrible situation in the world, does he remember—-though he’s a brilliant mind, with all the honors in the world—-does he recall when he went forth as a sower and planted that seed? That’s what I mean by recall.

Everything in this world you and I planted it. So someone comes into our world that we’ve known over the years and here comes a horrible state…or a lovely state. Do we recall when at some moment in the past we entertained just such a future for that person? Do we recall that we entertained it for that person? Of course we will justify it, we’ll say, well, when I recall that past (if I do) the situation at the time was so and so and so, and so I will justify my impression of that moment. It was that impression at that moment in time that I planted relative to that individual. “All that I behold, though it appears without, it is within, in my Imagination, of which this world of mortality is but a shadow” (Blake). For he gave me himself and there is nothing but God, so I can’t pass the buck. I can’t say, well, he did so and so, she did so and so or they did so and so. I can’t pass the buck. It all takes place within me.

So everyone this night if you really believe it…he said you’re either for or against me, there’s no lukewarmness. “Were that you were either hot or cold; but because you are neither hot nor cold but lukewarm, I spew you out” (Rev. 3:16). So when you hear the story, that imagining creates reality, either be cold to it and reject it, or be warm to it and accept it and live by it. But to be lukewarm and say, “I’ll play it safe, I’ll accept it, but I’m not going to sell my stocks and my bonds and things of that sort, I make no radical change in my world, because in the event it doesn’t work I want so and so as a cushion.” So you either accept it or you don’t accept. So, he who is not for me is against me…no lukewarmness at all. And man is invited to go out and simply take his record and falsify it.

So it doesn’t really matter where we were born in this world. It doesn’t really matter what limitations were imposed upon birth. For tonight, should anyone here make their exit from this world, you will be restored to life and find yourself in a world that is an automatic projection of all that is unreaped here to reap it there, while God still is playing his part within you. For “He who began a good work within you, he will bring it to completion at the day of Jesus Christ” (Phil. 1:6). So do not for one moment think it will not be completed; it’s being completed in us. But while it’s being completed we are inserted into the same time series best suited for the fulfillment of the unfulfilled desires that we have planted, good, bad or indifferent. So then everyone here is actually free if he knows he is the being spoken of in scripture—-that he can be any man, any woman in this world, really, if he really believes it." - the sower 1965

He's talking about being polar with either having belief or not. which I can mostly get behind. He also says at the end part there that everything in this world that is unreaped will be reaped in the next iteration, meaning continuing on? Well he's said one one lecture I believe that your skin colour can change when you go into a new iteration and the time period can change and all that so how does that work? It must mean something else, perhaps thematically we reap those seeds, and their meaning and cascade not in sensory detail but in overarching lessons that need integrating?

"Q: Neville, do you consider consciousness, awareness of being and Imagination are all the same thing? A: Yes I do. To be aware of being is to be conscious, and to be aware of being is to imagine. I may not be active. I call imagining the activity, but Imagination is to be aware of being. I call them the same. I coined the word “imaginal” ___(??), because I don’t see why you can’t make an adjective of the word. So I like it very much, “an imaginal activity” which would be Imagination in action. Q: In these little scenes…I remember reading in The Law and the Promise about the woman who lost her furniture, and she sat in her hotel room, and I understood it to mean she repeated this little scene in her mind until fi nally she was sitting in her own apartment surrounded by her own furniture, just by sheer repetition." - works by faith 1965

Right there NG revealed that he uses imaginal simply as a term that's the best thing he can think of to describe the phenomena, not that it literally IS.

Here's my insight. All that exists is thematic current, substances that are eternal, the states of scripture. These are all that exist within us and the pathway cascades are the unfolding of those into "limitation" to REPRESENT metaphysically those currents. All that exists within us in "imagination" is the subconscious field geometry of the aetheric body. That's who we really are, that's what we are moving when we "feel". It's ALL current. ALL OF IT IS CURRENT. So that means that EVERY imaginal scene is as NG said an IMPLICATION that activates those currents that will have a new arrangement which will unfold into the psychology we experience. That's the "state" and it's relative to the fixed pattern within us all which he also talked about which we're expanding through this work. It's ALL there. The imaginal details don't matter, the implications and meanings matter.

Apparently Eden also means "the spot for the moment where the presence of God is an open door to heaven". God placed man in Eden. The Jing? The thematic sequences? It's just crazy to see all of these aspects of RS coming true in his language and even seeing another level of scripture. That stupid "metaphysical bible interpretation" is utter trash throw that away and take things as we're going over here. Eden seems to represent the capacity for the Jing to unfold I'd assume. Jing is as I've said a "door" that closes slowly over your life by living in compromise since you're in sin so much. The more you're in alignment the more that door opens, and thus prenatal Jing is NOT fixed as TCM explains but that it can be "restored" more or less through living correctly and keeping the door open. Aging must therefore be a metaphysical representation of sin that's closing the door to God of the infinite supply we'd have access to if we completed our work. Immortality work is what this is all about.

Returning to the state, persisting, is continuing to make decisions which "water the seed" as in expands those implied pathway cascades that unfold the full vision you have for your life. This means IMPLIED INVOLVEMNET STATE STREAK. Same thing. Everyone experiences this. Obviously.

"Man is the fallen tree. Have you ever seen pictures in drugstores or in medical books of man with his skin off and the entire nervous system and his circulating system exposed…all the veins, all the arteries, all the nerves revealed? The skin is removed but the man remains. Isn’t that an inverted tree rooted in the brain? Well now, this tree has to turn up. It does not turn up until you go up the water shaft. Then man, who is now down in generation where all of his power is towards generation in this world— sex in the extreme sense—then he is lifted up. When he is lifted which is called the resurrection he enters the world or regeneration, where he creates just as this lady who wrote the letter created. You create not on a divided image; you animate forms with the power that comes out of you. You are life itself, life within you, not going down into generation but moving up into regeneration; for man in the resurrection is above the organization of sex (Luke 20:35). He creates without a divided image and all of his energies are flowing up." - the purpose of life 1967

Well here he likens the brain to be the seed and the tree to be the nervous system and everything else. In TCM it's the opposite, the Jing is the root and unfolds into all other aspects of the being. This makes far more sense metaphysically as well. The legs are like roots, the seed is planted at the base of the spine and the systems that expand up from the root are the trunk with the hands and head you could say being the branches and leaves. He talks about "this tree has to turn up" and that means the "turning of the light" in other systems.

"So when men do violence to themselves to bring it about, it’s stupid. There are men who will take the vow of celibacy and there are women who take the vow of celibacy. There are men…you go back into the early church, Origen, possibly the most influential early father of the Christian faith, who lived in the 2nd Century. Possibly next to Augustine he is the most influential. He castrated himself in the hope that he could produce it. You can’t produce it, not by any physical violence to yourself. Not a thing you can do until you are turned around. And it’s done by that violent act where you are split in two from top to bottom. When that body of yours is split in two and you see that golden liquid light that went into generation, and you fuse with it, as you behold it, up you go…as David entered the city of God. And there you are. No one can come through that gate for the entrance in is up the water shaft. So she saw it perfectly when she saw herself locked on the outside before the wooden gates. But that is only a foreshadowing of that which is in store for her. For she saw it and she saw the power that is hers, she saw what really is her future. But she will enter up the water shaft."

This is what he means. The water shaft, the water element is the root that unfolds all the way through to air. You turn the light from water into air. Unconscious into superconscious, heaven. That's the ascension to heaven from the man of this world who's rooted in the ground. The turning around is spiritually expanding, knowing yourself to be of the higher nature because you operate as yourself completely.

"In the Old Testament, David cried out: “Arise, O Lord and break the teeth of the wicked.” And in the New Testament, those who refused to accept the doctrine of Christ wept and gnashed their teeth as the door opened and the righteous entered the kingdom of heaven.

Imagination is defined as spiritual sensation. Come, let us now sense spiritual things that are not physically present. Right now I want you to feel a tennis ball, then a baseball, a volleyball, and a golf ball. They all feel different, do they not? If you can discriminate between these different balls, are they not real? If you can touch a tennis ball and spiritually distinguish it from a baseball, it must exist, even though it is unseen by mortal eye. So you see: you can behold a thing that is not seen by the mortal eye as though it were, and if you do your faith in Jesus Christ will cause the unseen to become seen.

Your friends are your own lack or limitation made visible. Like Job, pray for your friends and your own fears will be lifted." - Both are from - faith in god 1968

So here he's talking about how your own lacks are shown in the lives of others often times. That's only if that illuminates in you something of lack personally. There will always be people who lack, though you don't have to involve with them. I don't know if someone who's extremely highly expanded would be sort of "immune" from even experiencing other peoples suffering at all as in that just wouldn't be experienced but I doubt that. So unless he's talking about this from that perspective where other people are revealing something in you that holds them in that state then it's simply that their lack brings out of you feeling that's lacking. All of this feeling stuff is an activation based on something in the pathways being illuminated. It's all for expansion purposes, not subjective. This is how you correctly interpret his work.

"I could multiply that by dozens and dozens in my own case, and unnumbered in those who attend my meetings. So, it is simply imagination plus faith. As we are told, without faith it is impossible to please Him. The one we please is not some external being; it is internal . . your own wonderful imagination.

Now, I will put you to the test. We are told in the 13th chapter of II Corinthians: “Examine yourselves, to see whether you are holding to the faith. Test yourselves. Do you not realize that Jesus Christ is in you? . . Unless indeed you fail to meet the test!” (II Corinthians 13:5) Now I just gave you the test. This is the test: If the word “God,” “Lord,” “Jesus Christ” conveys the sense of an existent something outside of man, you have failed the test, for Jesus Christ is in you. He said, “Examine yourselves to see whether you are holding to the faith. Test yourselves. Do you not realize that Jesus Christ is in you? . . Unless indeed you fail to meet the test!” (II Corinthians 13:5) If the word “Jesus Christ” conveys the existence of someone outside of you, you didn’t meet the test. And all things are done by Him. “Without Him was not anything made that is made.” (John 1:3) And He is your own wonderful human imagination!" - Imagination plus faith 1971

This is just on faith more so.

"Now, John Mills defines causation as the assemblage of phenomena, which occurring, some other phenomena commence to appear in the world. In other words, causation is the assemblage of an imaginal state implying the fulfillment of desire, which feeling will activate and produce in the world. And H. G. Wells put it this way: “Throughout the ages, life is nothing more than a continuing solution to a continuous synthetic problem,” How many times have you said to yourself: if I only had x-number of dollars I could live comfortably, then inflation appears and you are forced to use your creative power to construct an imaginal solution to your new problem." - Your maker 1969

In this one it's another example of implication being the "assemblage" being the pathway cascades in the field geometry representing this.

"Now, threefold vision is when these images intertwine, inter-blend, have love affairs, marry, and beget new images. A day dream is threefold vision. A dream of the night is threefold vision, because it’s “soft Beulah’s night.” But you don’t have to wait for night: Your moods are your dreams in daylight. I can capture a mood. If I could sustain a mood, and dream through the day with a mood which would imply the fulfillment of my dream, I am setting something in motion." - Blake four types of vision 1968

This is NG telling us that moods are daydreams. In other words, moods, states, are what we move in and out of throughout the day, as he's stated many times. What we serve, what we're conforming to, who we're being thus is stemming from the supply/demand process we play out.

"But if I know that imagining does create reality, I’ll do something about it. I will take these lovely images and let them interweave, and so construct them that when I bring that scenery into my mind’s eye it is implying something. Its implication is its power. What does it imply?" - Blake four types of vision 1968

"Construct a scene which would imply the fulfillment of your desire. Enter the scene and remain there. If your imaginal counselor (your feeling of fulfillment) agrees with that which is used to illustrate your fulfilled desire, your fantasy will become a fact. If it does not, start all over again by creating a new scene and enter it. It costs you nothing to imagine consciously!" - brazen impudence 1968

"Contemplate this thought. On this level you may achieve any objective, and prove to yourself that invisible states, when properly rearranged, will externalize what they imply, for the potency of every imaginal act is in its implication.

Listen closely to your invisible thoughts. What do you hear? What are your words implying? That is their potency. What do you want? Name it and rearrange the structure of your mind to imply you no longer desire it, because you already have it!" - creation, faith 1968

Here's another example of him talking about implication and arrangement. It's so consistent. I see no contradiction. Interestingly he talks about "invisible thoughts" here. He tells us their IMPLICATION is their POTENCY. That's another term to study.

"So I assemble in my mind’s eye images that if true would imply the fulfillment of my dream. Its potency is in its implication. So they all play together, interweaving, and finally they fall in love, and then comes the fulfillment." - Blake four types of vision 1968

"You start with a dream; and you conceive a scene, which, if true, would imply the fulfillment of your dream in this world; that the potency of that thing is all in what it is implying." - test him and see 1969

17/12/25

"Let no one frighten you about the world coming to an end, only your journey will end. When scripture mentions the buildings falling, that’s all symbolic. I experienced that back in 1960 when I watched all of the buildings fall, but they were not buildings here but beliefs by which I lived. After my visions I could no longer believe in the little historical Jesus or what my mother taught me in the Christian faith, so all of the structures of my mind by which I lived had to fall. Then I had to build a new foundation from scratch, and the only foundation is the Christ." - The bible's mystery 1969

"But always think of Jesus Christ as the little child, always the little child who always delighted in the presence of his Father, and he was the one who always experienced the emotion of delight.

The creative power experiences that. He’s not the source of it; he’s the one who experiences the emotion of delight. When one comes to this realization and finds the little child signifying his own birth from above, thereafter he finds the son that is given. And then the son that is given reveals to him who he is, and he breaks the wheel of death. For this is the mystery of life through death: “Unless a seed falls into the ground and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, it brings forth much” (John 12:24).

So, God became man in his creative power that man may become God (Phil. 2:7), so all the commands are by God to God. Man as we see him in this world is part of the eternal structure of the universe. This thing called Neville—and all of its phases from the time it appeared on the scene until that moment in time when it vanishes and ceases to be to those who are left at that moment in time has never passed away, and it was not really brought into being. It was always a part of the structure of the universe.

I am animating it, as we are animating with the creative power, animating all of this in this world. I will leave it forever… it will still be part of the eternal structure of the universe, and unless animated, it remains dead in its every little aspect. The babe that nursed the mother, the little one reluctantly on his way to school, the little boy trying to find his way in life, the man, all of that, are simply garments that you animate. And the day will come, you and I, having gone through all the furnaces, experiencing this creative power that is God, will awake, and we are the creative power of God and one with God. Then we can say we are Yehudah.

Then a new venture…a new play with the same characters, for they remain part of the eternal structure of the universe. We conceive an entirely different drama. Now, tonight if you went to a play and you saw the actors, would you condemn them for the parts they play?" - The cabala 1965

"Well, I can’t tell anyone in this world what’s going to happen after we construct the play. So we construct the play. In the beginning was the play… that is the story…and all the human characters are bound to come, because wherever the play is there all the characters gather. I don’t have to concern myself with anything in this world. I have a brother, my second brother, who actually conceived a play and he saw it in his mind’s eye so clearly. Didn’t have a nickel, we had none, but he saw a sign which if true would imply that we as a family owned that structure, and that we were conducting business in it. My brother today is, in a really true sense of the word, he’s a lonely man. Because he’s become so powerful in the business world, the people that he knew so intimately before are afraid of him. He goes home, he’s all alone. He’s coming up here this week on business. He represents millions and millions, and it’s touched him in his own strange way because he actually grew into his picture. He’s weaned himself from his entire social world, because he’s a powerful business man in his area. Our President today, let no one tell you with all this bravado he is a very happy man…he’s a lonely man. People are afraid of him. He’s grown into his vision of what he wanted.

Everyone can grow into their vision if they will only actually believe the story. God told me a story in the beginning of time, and that story was he would so become me that I would become God. But he didn’t impose it upon me that I had to believe it, he swore it unto himself. I didn’t have to believe it—that’s unconditioned. But while I am passing through the horrors of the world, I must imitate God as a dear child and impose upon myself the same kind of a story, and believe it. Not take anyone into my confi dence, simply take myself and believe it. So I must imagine that I am the man that I want to be. I’m not saying let the two of us believe it, for I could pass the buck and say, well now, you didn’t keep your faith with me, you didn’t believe it. So I could always pass it to someone else. No, you can’t pass it to anyone else, it’s all to one’s self…either I believe it or I don’t. For God believed it and he brought it forth in me. I’m speaking from experience. He brought forth his child in me. He did it! He began the good work in me; he brought it to completion by the birth of the child in me (Phil. 1:6). Now I, as a man, must assume that I am the man that I want to be, and not turn to anyone for assistance and say, well now, you aren’t helping me, you aren’t agreeing with me, you aren’t joining with me. I don’t need anyone to join with me. I must imitate God as a dear child. If I imitate him, I do exactly what he did, and he did it without the help of anyone; for God is one, and so I am one. And so I simply start with the story…in the beginning was the story." - the law 1965

"Well, here is one…and many of you present heard it a few years ago… one morning, early in the morning, I had this experience. I’m standing in an enormous mansion on Fifth Avenue in New York City and three generations are supposed to be present. One is invisible—-he is spoken of as “Grandfather.” There are two generations, the second and the third, and the second generation is telling the story of Grandfather. The second one tells this story, “Grandfather used to say while standing on an empty lot, ‘I remember when this was an empty lot’ and then he would paint a word picture of his desire for that lot, and paint it so vividly they saw exactly the structure that would stand upon it. But to him it was standing upon it, and they saw it as something present standing upon it.” Well, they told that story in my presence. Then I woke and found myself on my bed…it was around three in the morning. I got out and wrote it out on a big yellow page, the entire story. It was too early to remain up, so I went back to bed and redreamed the dream. This time, as I went into the same structure, instead of hearing someone tell the story I’m telling the story. I so absorbed the message of the faith of Grandfather, I told them that I was standing on an empty lot, and standing on it I would remember when it was an empty lot. Then I painted for them the word picture of my desire for that lot in such graphic manner that they all saw it as I painted it in words." - same lecture

Right there's another example of "structure" he's using. The so called structure is the sensory experience. He said the sensory details have no power. This is correct and I can't believe nobody has figured that out properly yet. There's some that do say the sensory details are symbolic and it's the feeling but they don't even know what the feeling is actually doing and I've been talking about thematic currents for over a year now. The structure is contained within the feeling. The feeling is what holds the change, not the sensory details. Think about this. The thing that triggers you into a somatic response is already thematically determined, so that means that the implication of that response is where the shift in the arrangement of the pathway cascades comes from and thus the details don't matter since they're thematically integrated within the feeling. Feeling once again representing the detaching of the trash to accept more of self, which obviously will have an associated structure built into it else you'd not have something TO respond to, and that is relative to the fixed point of comparison as individuated self. This is why I argue that NG was in fact teaching expansion doctrine at core and it's ONLY through the RS view that this can be made clear. This is why practically you really can't separate the expansion from the transformation in the world. They're one in the same thing.

"But tonight bring a friend (or he may be an opponent) before your mind’s eye and represent him to yourself as being in a finer state, or freer, and then be faithful to your mental structure. Then, in a way no one knows, it will take on reality in your world and crystallize and become a fact." - the bread and the wine 1959

So here we have NG telling us to do this to someone else. Why? Well he said before that other people represent parts of us, which I can interpret correctly as conflicts that are unresolved they're bringing out of us. IF there's a feeling there, a charge, then obviously seeing someone else higher CAN move current within you too if that's the expansion. This is an interesting point because he often talks about seeing other people in higher states a lot and not just seeing self there. He's more or less trying to trick people into accepting the parts of them that aren't resolved yet through dropping projections from those conflicts, I believe. Remember the sensory details don't matter, but the implied movement of current and what that's illuminating in the pathway cascades holds the power. It's all current moving.

"I think you know how thrilled I am to be back here, for this is the one platform that grants me complete freedom. You know that. Dr. Bailes has never once restricted me or even suggested any condition. He gives me complete freedom of this platform, and for that I am really very happy, for I couldn’t be here unless he did.Now I have brought you this year an entirely new series. I have named this first one “The Power of Awareness” because it is the foundation stone on which the entire structure rests. Not a thing has happened in the past year to shake that foundation. Many things have happened, many revelations, many experiments, and yet the foundation remains intact.

For those not familiar with this foundation, we make the claim that consciousness is the one and only reality. So, if you call God the ultimate reality, that is the name we give to this ultimate reality. So we say Consciousness is God. We say consciousness in action is imagination. And if consciousness in action, or God in action, is the Son bearing witness of his Father, then we come to the conclusion that imagination is that son." - the power of awareness 1953

So here he defined imagination as "consciousness in action". A "movement" of God, currents. Feeling. That's the "secret" as he said anyway.

"Now that is the definition of this fabulous realm. Now let us look at the claim made for this realm. Our mental scientists, psychiatrists and psychologists of today refer to this region as the creative power in man; that everything in man’s world is determined by the activities of the subconscious mind; that man himself has absolutely no control over the activities of this region unless he first gets into a relationship with it. For here is a region that they call the subconscious; others call it the “unconscious” , and still others speak of it as the “collective unconscious”, but they claim for it a creative power that molds the outer world in harmony with the inner arrangement of its self. So they give it structure, they give it reality, they give it form, and they claim its structure determines the outer structure we observe and call the only reality: that any modification in the internal structure of this deep region results in corresponding changes in the outer objective world. But then they leave us at the mercy of IT, unless we can find the trick of entering into a relationship with it." - same lecture

Interesting quote. He's talking about a "fabulous realm" as well as "internal structure" of this "deep region". Then above he's talking about the subconscious. The field geometry. He's literally telling us here that there is in fact a structure to our consciousness that's not subjective and this clearly represents the meridian systems. This is crazy. He called the subconscious it's own realm, it's own world basically. Then he tells us, very rightly, that we enter into a relationship with it.

"So, let us turn back and freshen up again this word which has been so abused, which now is your imagination, which people, without defining, call the “subconscious” as though it was some appendage. People go around speaking of “my subconscious mind”, or “My unconscious mind”, not knowing what they are referring to." - same lecture

BOOM. There's the definition. He right there called the subconscious mind THE imagination. Buttttt, which facet is he talking about? The structural aspect it would seem. The feminine aspect of Saturn. There's also a male aspect of Saturn remember too so this is why it's so difficult to exactly determine what archetypal nature he's discussing. He has called the imagination both feminine and masculine in nature, though it's typically God the father as the masculine and the personal subconscious as feminine, earth, which is correct as well from a basic level view.

"Well, this fabulous series of mental states is your imagination. And may I tell you it has form, it has structure, just as real as the visible objective world; that the inner world is a world of reality. Call it by any name. I call it my wonderful imagination, and it assumes the form of all that I accept and consent to as true. It actually assumes the form of the sum total of all of my beliefs, and my beliefs need not be true. They need not come near the truth. My beliefs could be prejudices; they could be superstitions. It doesn’t care. It will take all the stripes of men and wear them. So it will assume the form of the sum total of all that man consents to in this world, and then mold the outer world in harmony with the inner arrangement of itself. Therefore, to change the outer world, I must modify or change, in some way alter, the structure of the inner or second man . . the second man being my imagination." - same lecture

"Series of mental states". Man this work is worth billions. Everything RS has bene talking about with pathway cascades and such can be correlated here. All that physics study I did that not a single other person supported in this space is correct. That's called being real and trusting inner truth despite the world not resonating. He also talks about so called beliefs not even needing to be true to show up. That's also correct, not in the subjective sense of solipsism and truth though but that's not seemingly what he's talking about. I like when he said it's what man consents to. What you buy into is typically how that works, but not exclusively since there's globalist agendas propagated by juize who are playing those roles regardless of if people consent or not, though I do wonder if people know something isn't right but go along anyway. That feeling in itself can manifest too, since there's a thematic association there which will show up in the most available way according to their structure. So we can clearly determine now that structure is subconscious, imaginal sensory with substantive nature and that the implication is the effect of that arrangement, the pathway cascades relative to fixed point of comparison. The desires are given to us by God as he said, so that means that natural striving is also a thing and that determines how we feel, where the charge is, and thus where expansion is which is the power of accepting innate self more and "tending to the garden of Eden" you could say.

"Now, if I don’t like the outer world, and I really believe it is caused by the structure of the inner or second man, I then must change his likeness, change his form, by observing how I react to all the unlovely, and how I am not interested in the praise of another, and then begin to feed my sheep, begin to change my thoughts, my feelings, my moods concerning others, and as I begin to change my reactions to people, I find I am changing the structure of the Son of God. And then I automatically produce corresponding changes in my outer world." - same lecture

Changing thoughts and feeling and moods does nothing unless those REACTIONS as he later said IMPLY a movement of current that's different. Sinking charge for example and then approaching the same scenario will minimize the importance of it and thus the thoughts correlated won't show up automatically the same way since the current that would agitate and drive thoughts of such nature has no basis to manifest. The pathways aren't firing since the substances are stable,

"Another word used, which is not often used, but it’s always translated truth, and that is Emeth—Aleph, Mem, Toph—that’s translated truth. Well, what is a true judgment? Now this is called faith. A true judgment, said the world of Caesar, must conform to the external reality to which it relates, that’s what Caesar said. I say, “Isn’t that a wonderful plant!” and you say, “What plant? Now he’s really gone.” So there’s a marvelous plant…and not one sees a plant…but I am seeing a plant, a lovely plant. And so, that’s a false judgment, for it does not conform to the external fact to which my judgment relates. There is no plant, so that’s a lie. So the word faith which is Emeth in another way is truth. So that’s not true…but I still say I see a plant; and I live in the assumption that that was an act, God acted. All things are possible to God. And so, in my Imagination I saw a plant. Who saw it? Well, God acted. Can I accept it? Can I react? For God acts and I’m called upon to react; God speaks and I’m called upon to say “Amen” to what he said. So can I say “Amen” to that…that there’s a plant there? If I can say “Amen” to it, well, then it’s done. And in no time, and in a way I do not know and could not devise, someone’s going to bring a plant. But they will say, “But someone brought it, it didn’t grow out of the piano.” Did I tell you it’s coming out of the piano? They want me to bring it out of something." - the power of faith 1964

I've not read this one yet, or at least I don't remember.

Back from more training. Man this stuff is brutal. Building the biology requires substance to be available to expand the capacity it has but then stimulus to trigger that growth is also required.

Here's another one where NG is talking about "pulling up" seeds through a lack of faith. This clearly points to the necessity of maintaining stability, not 24/7 in terms of one fixation but that you regularly return to this fixation by involving with it more than anything else. He did also say go go all out and not look back. That's what "going all the way" really is about, becoming unrecognizable and crossing the threshold of compromise into acceptance through involvement that reflects that. This is real transformation.

"What do I think he would like to be? Well, I could ask him, Are you satisfied with life? Maybe he tells me, No, he would like more money, a greater income, security, more health . . he names it. Then without raising a finger or asking anyone to help me, I could, by the use of my talent which is my imagination, represent him to myself as he would be seen by me if it were true, and without waiting for confirmation, let me assume that it is true, knowing in my heart that “The vision [which is now my vision] has its own appointed hour. It ripens, and it will flower. If it seems long, then [I must] wait, for it is sure, and it will not be late.” (Habakkuk 2:3) It will not be late for the thing that I have done, for all little seeds have their own appointed hour. A man comes forward in nine months, the horse in twelve months; how long the elephant takes, I don’t know, but a chicken in twenty-one days. So, every little seed has its own appointed hour." - the potters house unknown date

So here he tells us "Then without raising a finger or asking anyone to help me" as though it's speaking to the people who assume that there's no way of making it happen at all without action. I'm going to argue that action is in many cases necessary, though it will feel necessary, not out of "needing" but out of a willingness to expand. He never frames how this context of "without raising a finger" is to be properly interpreted so we need to assume that this is the way it is, based on all the other parts I've been through thus far it would make sense to see it this way. Don't lift a finger to make it happen isn't a rule, because that's not always true. It has to be speaking to a certain person who's got a rule against anything happening through inner work, as a sort of address to speak to their conditions just as he said how you don't need to ask anyone for permission or help or anything like that. That's a pretty clear context that's explored here, he's more or less speaking to the people who don't get the mechanics and that it CANNOT be a rule because there's innumerable instances where action can and will be necessary but it will be something you'll WANT to involve in as a function of persistence. You see the vision as worth and thus as you continue to expand into that direction you'll be willing to face whatever pressure is necessary to attain the naturalness of being and having. This work I do here, I need to act all the time to manifest and I felt contrast in the beginning to face but now it's normal and I don't feel any of that charge at all anymore.

"So, that peculiar seed that I have just planted for a friend or for myself . . how long it is going to take, I don’t know, but I must actually believe it. And when I believe it, I drop it. A seed must fall into the ground and rot if it is to be made alive. I cannot hold it in my mind’s eye; if I take it and do not drop it, then it remains just a seed. I must drop it into the earth and let it rot. And when it rots, it means that I have dropped it from my mind. I’ve done it. That’s all I can do. And then, in its own wonderful appointed hour it will ripen." - same lecture

He said he cannot hold it in his minds eye. He must "drop" it. I've talked about this before about how I don't see this whole thing as dropping a seed as even a thing, but more or les a function of actual detachment stemming from satisfaction. Stability. You won't want to dig it up if you're satisfied. Being agitated will mean you'll need that thing to feel stable, thus why you keep digging it up as he says to feel stimulated again and try to pseudo salsify the pressure. Moving the pressure satisfies the need to check.

"Revise, then drop it as he dropped the ball. Release the past and hold onto the vision of what you want in its place. With this power you can completely redeem the past, “And God requires the past.” And, although your sins be as scarlet they shall be white as snow." - Christ in man 1966

Well this sounds like a contradiction doesn't it? He's telling us to now hold onto the vision of what you want, in the place of the old. Think about this. If he's telling us to let it go and "drop" it into the soil to grow but yet he tells us also to hold onto the vision of what we want, then it would mean in the context of the last quote here to leave behind who we were and become unrecognizable in the persistence which is what that would mean. It's different processes for different stages of expansion. If otherwise, then it would contradict. I wouldn't call that a stretch, but I need more sources to validate this to be the case since it's so vague.

"You dwell upon it and don’t neglect the principle of your wonderful imagination. Use it lovingly on behalf of everything, for when you do, you are using it on yourself, as there is no other. The world is yourself pushed out. Imagine and then drop it. You don’t have to burst a blood vessel, call the “right” people, or do the “right” thing in order to succeed. All you need do is assume you are now what you want to be. Remain faithful to that assumption and in a way that no one knows you will become it. Then try it again and again, and while you are about your Father’s business working this principle, another work, unknown to the world, is taking place in you, preparing you for the fullness of time when the egg you have been carrying throughout the centuries is fertilized. Then, thirty years later, it erupts and all that is said of Christ is experienced in a personal, most intimate manner." - He is my resurrection 1968

Here's another one of him telling us to drop it, and don't take it seriously. That depends on where you're at when you do it.

"A. Some things we may desire may not be the best things for us. Naturally, I’ll agree with that. But I am free to choose. And my choice may be a wrong one, but I cannot say in advance that I would regret it. If it’s my choice, I must be big enough . . having made the choice and discover afterwards that it’s not what I want to perpetuate . . to drop it. It’s a state, and only a state. We have all kinds of ways of detaching after our choice has been proven wrong. Today many a person is planning his retirement . . planning all sorts of things. You can go off to Mexico, or you can go to Greece, go some place where you think you can live better and cheaper . . to discover after a year of it that he’s homesick; he wants to return to his native land. But that was his choice, if he is big enough to admit to himself: “I planted it” and then replant his seed." - Many mansions 1969

Here's him reminding us that the seed is the state, the reaction, the reality of that experience. You have the reaction and that moves the field geometry, That movement will cause others to respond accordingly, provided that as we've explored a means of involvement will be available for that, else you'll get what's closest to that on a thematic level. This is what signs are, except they're usually manifestations that bring out of you the trash reactions again and again because you don't see through the conditions binding you to seeing things in the way you've been.

"Perchance there is someone here who did not hear it . . the man is a negro, and his problem was that because he was a negro, all the marks and stripes of the world were against him. I tried to convince him it was only in his own mind that these stripes were placed; his acceptance of that as restriction made it restriction, but if he could only drop it by non-acceptance, by complete indifference, to the pigment of skin he could accomplish his every dream by acceptance of it now." - sound investments 1953

Here's a more practical example of "drop it". The condition is that this guy was black and saw that as a limit. When he looked at that condition and said screw that I'll do what I want anyway, by following the process that I've explained before, then you can drop the importance. NG literally said "by complete indifference" that he could accomplish his thing. What is he being indifferent to? The "stripes" or the conditions and trash, so he does what he wants regardless of conditions. That's the acceptance, or in this case "non-acceptance" of the conditions/restriction. NG right here gave a practical example of how this works by deconditioning from a condition against natural striving. You experience what you want regardless of the expectation to conform to, and that moves the current since you'll be IN the experience under pressure internally and move the same current as though it was real. Thing is that doing this is far harder than just doing it externally you'll find, but in theory it's possible IF you can take it all the way as though it really was real. The only way to make that work would be to place yourself into the thematics of the condition observing you and regardless of that observation you experience having what you want, which is how I got the overnight SP manifestation.

The state is replicated, the state being the response, relative to the fixed point of comparison through the pathway cascades as the implication and that's where the power is which is expansion. The state is what he said before, just accept the state, meaning just accept a new arrangement for how you'd respond to something. That's the seed, the implication is what that response means about you and the world around you. That's where the charge is, the current that arranges the structure according to the implication of that seed and how the overlaps of the states applies.

"Now, the whole vast world, and all within it, is nothing more than the appeasement of hunger. That’s the whole of life: the appeasement of hunger. And there are infinite states from which the Lord may view the world to appease that hunger. The “first man” can’t do it. He can only feed upon what his senses dictate. Wherever he is, he feeds upon the facts of life as he sees the facts.

It takes the “Second Man” to disengage Himself from that restriction and enter into a state . . any state in the world . . and feed upon it, and then . . in time . . bring the “first man” to feed upon it." - catch the mood unknown date

This is another example of him talking about inner response being the way it works. The second man being the subconscious mind, remember as we quoted above. I need to be putting all of these terms into a list of relationships. There's just so many.

When he talks about restrictions and limitations, they're the inner level barrier that prevents someone from accepting the vision and going all the way. It's the same thing as though it was real physically and they're involved. That's how it always has been anyway, because if it's real you'd internally respond anyway, though as I've said endlessly that doing this without moving current externally in satisfying ways where you can will only make the inner work 100x harder. The whole talk about restrictions and limitation and conditions is more or less just you unable to accept being real with the vision and accepting it regardless of the trash in the way.

"In Scripture, above and within are the same; below and without are the same. So, when you read, “I AM from above,” he’s telling you, “I AM from within”, for he tells you, “the kingdom of heaven is within you.” (Luke 17:21) So, I AM from above, therefore I AM from within. You, the ‘outer man’ . . you are from without, therefore you are from below. You are of this world. I don’t have to remain anchored to what my senses dictate and tell me that I AM. I need not be here. You, looking at me from the outside, as the “outer man,” will say, “Neville is on the platform.” Knowing my complete outer world, you would know my restrictions, my limitations. You do not know my ambitions, my dreams, my wishes. I, and I alone, know my ambitions and my wishes. The “Inner Man” knows them, and He knows how to enter these states and prepare a state for the “outer man” to fulfill it. The “outer man” can’t do it. The “outer man” is completely anchored by his senses and confirmed by his reason.." - same lecture

So this is another example, but as I've said it doesn't matter what the outer man sees as conditions since the inner man will be doing the moving. I don't even see this point he raises as practically relevant in most cases anyway since it's part of the process of going all the way. He's just saying this to psychologically lead the pathways of those with conditions into acceptance, that's all. It's just like the "don't lift a finger" thing, because if he really means that as a rule then he's full of trash, because we know that's not always true, so the only common sense interpretation is the same thing he's doing here as speaking to those with conditions that think they need to "do something" under a pseudo satisfaction context to make it happen instead of going all the way. It's another psychological pathway leading game he's playing with that I believe, but since most people don't get what that really means, then it's obviously interpreted at literally sit around and do nothing of value for yourself and just imagine. It really should be applied to live the best life you want and show up in the way you really want to which is satisfying for you. He often approaches it from the inner level of spontaneous responses to experiences of life and then moves on. He basically just moves the current through going all the way into acceptance of that part of him that's holding desire/pressure to experience it and then moves on since according to the mechanics, the pathway cascades when ripe will unfold according to the vision if the implication is touched on closely enough to move the dysfunction away. That once again as always requires you to GO ALL THE WAY, else it's not fully ripe to unfold and you'll continue to go through cycles of peak dip until that lesson is learned.

"Well, I told this gentleman exactly what Abdullah had taught me, that there was no cause outside of the arrangement of his own mind. If he was discriminated against, it was not because of the pigment of his skin, though he showed me signs as large as all outdoors denying him access to a certain area. The sign is there only because in the minds of some men such patterns are formed and they draw unto themselves what now they would condemn; that there is no power outside the mind of man to do anything to man, and he by the arrangement of his own mind, by consenting to these restrictions in his cradle and being conditioned slowly through his youth, waking into manhood believing himself set upon would have to be set upon, but “no man cometh unto me save I call him”. So then someone comes to condemn or to praise. They couldn’t come unless I call them. Not a man called Neville, but that secret being that is not called Neville. The secret being that is the sum total of all of my beliefs , all of the things that I consent to, that form a pattern of structure, that secret being draws unto itself things in harmony with itself. Well, that man went away and wrestled with himself. He couldn’t believe everything I told him, not that night, but last Sunday morning in the lobby, he came forward and we renewed the friendship. He took me next door to show me the fruit of this teaching ." - changing the feeling of I 1953

So here's another example of him talking about things we consent to and how that all forms into a pattern of structure, field geometry.

"He said, “Neville, it took me almost three years to really overcome that fixed idea that I, by the accident of birth, would be a secondary citizen, but I overcame .it. Now here is my office on Wilshire Boulevard. I picked this one not because it was the only one offered; four equally wonderful spots were offered me. I took this one because it had greater telephone facilities , but the others were equally good. Now here is my office. Now you couldn’t judge my income from this office, lovely as it is. Everything is nice about it, but, Neville, this year I will net a quarter of a million dollars”. Well in America that is still a fabulous sum of money. It would be staggering in any other part of the world, but even in fabulous America a man to net a quarter of a million is really up in the very highest of brackets. And that was the man that a few years ago told me the whole vast world was against him by reason of the accident of birth. He knows now he is what he is by virtue of the state of consciousness with which he is identified, and the choice is his to go back to the restrictions of his childhood when he believed the story or to continue in the freedom that he has found.

So you and I can be anything in this world we desire to be if we will clearly define our aim in life and constantly occupy that aim. It must be habitual. The concept we hold of self that is noble must not be put on just for a moment and taken off when we leave this church. We feel free here; we feel that we have something in common, that’s why we are here, but are we going to wear the noble concept we now hold of self when we go through the door and enter that bus, or are we going to return to the restrictions that were ours prior to coming here? The choice is ours and the hardest lesson to learn is that there is no one in this world that can be drawn into your world unless you, and you alone, call him." - same lecture

More relationship to childhood experiences. He's mentioned this multiple times as well. He also said revision is the only technique he'd teach if there was any.

"Although the words, “I and my father are one, yet my father is greater than I” appear to be contradictory, they are true. When I . . the awareness . . take on the limitation of flesh, I am aware of limitation. Finding myself in the form of a slave, I become obedient until death upon the cross called Man, where I remain as God, restricted by my incarnation. Then a predetermined plan erupts and delivers me from my self-imprisonment, and I return to the being I was . . but now enhanced because of my self-imposed restriction. Then I can say with Paul: “I have fought the good fight. I have finished the race. I have kept the faith. Now there is laid up for me the laurel leaf . . the crown of righteousness.”" - Christmas man's birth as God 1968

Here he tells us that being a slave to the flesh is how we become "enhanced". He calls it the "good fight" referencing Paul from scripture. Fight. Doesn't sound so "easy" does it.

"A: Well, the Promise came first and the law was given afterwards.

Q: But then who ___(??) here?

A: It’s good for you. It’s a creative power and why not in the world of Caesar live well, why not? Why not be creative? But as far as the Promise goes, it’s grace…and grace is unearned, unmerited. ___(??) gave in the letter to the Philippians, “He who began a good work in you will bring it to completion at the day of Jesus Christ” (1:6). The plan unfolds in you, for Christ is in you. Therefore, he began it and he’ll complete it. It was God’s wish, “Let us make man in our image.” So you’re told in the 8th chapter of Romans that “the creature was made subject unto futility, not willingly but by reason of the will of him who subjected him in hope”—and what was the hope?—“that he would be set free from the bondage to corruption and obtain the glorious liberty of the sons of God” (verse 20). Well, that’s going to happen, but it happens in a way no one foresaw. And therefore when it does take place, they don’t believe it. It’s not what they were looking for. Everyone wants a king on the outside and he doesn’t come that way. He unfolds in you and you are he. That’s why we are warned, don’t look here or look there. If anyone should tell you there he is or here he is, don’t look. It isn’t there. Your leader is within you and he will unfold within you. That’s the only Christ in the world.

Q: I’m not in communication because I have no understanding of “by grace.” What function do you mean “by grace”?

A: Well, grace as the scripture uses it means God’s gift of himself to man. It’s unearned by man, it’s unmerited. Men think they can earn it; they can’t earn it. So they have all kinds of things they teach…do this, do that to appease God, and then, of course, he will send the Promise upon you sooner.

Q: (inaudible)

A: No, I’m a man just as you are, with all the restrictions and limitations of a man. If I judged myself, I could honestly say I’d never find myself worthy to have received the grace that I have received; for I am still a man and I am in the world of Caesar. I’m very much a man. ___(??), therefore that’s one of the ___(??) that differs completely from the world of men in the world of Caesar. But no one can earn it." - eternal plan 1966

Well. That's interesting. So the law came second. The law is secondary to the promise. He said that grace is built into all of us as the pattern unfolds. Grace is bestowed before you existed because it's God processing that necessitates this to happen. He also said that man has all these limitations and restrictions. Built in? Therefore, wouldn't it be the case that if you imagined those restrictions weren't there, then you'd not manifest that? If restrictions on the biology are innate then doesn't that negate the law as an all encompassing thing?

"There came this separation on different levels to show how you can pray. You can be anything in this world. I would take a piece of wood, or a flower, or an animal and try to feel myself as it, and I finally could feel what it would be like to be a glass of water. For everything emanates from Divine Imagining, and I AM “It”, so then I AM everything. There is nothing but Divine Imagining, and “It” and human Imagination are one." - Esau and Jacob 1959

Well here's NG telling us that there's no difference between human imagination and divine imagination, yet before he said the difference is intensity. So what's going on here? Interestingly he also talks about being like a class of water. What would it "feel like" to be a glass of water? Well "target" it and sink into it. Does that mean you become a glass of water?

"Man finds it difficult to identify himself with his imagination, but the word “logos” . . translated “Word” means a purpose; a plan; a pattern. The Word which was with God in the beginning is Divine Imagination, through which all things are made. There is not one thing in the world today which was not first imagined. Perhaps you cannot grasp the idea that nature was first imagined, but you cannot deny that man’s clothing, home, business, and transportation, were imagined.

Man expresses himself through his human imagination, just as God expresses himself through his Divine Imagination. There is no clear-cut separation between God and Imagination, or man and his imagination. I tell you, Imagination is God Himself. He is the divine body Jesus, of which we are his members. Identifying Divine Imagination with Jesus, Blake claims Imagination became Man, that Man may become God’s power and wisdom, called Christ. Any Christ other than he who is crucified, buried, and rises in an individual is false, for there is no Christ other than man’s own wonderful human imagination." - Follow me 1968

Well here he talks about logos again, meaning, which he also likens to be a "pattern" or plan. I call that process and proportionality and fractality. States, Christ, eternal states as capacities. We know we are creating the Christ child, he's already there as the "Christ seed" that he's mentioned many times before, but we're by expanding ourselves as individuals becoming more like Christ and accepting more of that capacity. You view reality more from that expanded view, which is individuation. You're proportionate to that power. So if the eternal Christ seed is like a state as any other state of being, then elevating ones state into seeing more function in reality would be viewing things more from the Christ seed which unfolds it.

"So when you read the Gospels, whether it be Matthew, Mark, Luke or John, do not see a man walking through the pages, see the magnificence of Christ the Branch unfolding in you, and it takes root. There will come out a root from that stump. How does it take root? Well, you first hear the story and you believe it. Then the Word is planted. When one believes it, he has accepted the Word. The Word as translated in the Book of John is called Logos. “In the beginning was the Word,” that is the Greek Logos: “And the Word was with God and the Word was God.” That is really the translation of the Hebrew which means “The word of God, which contains within itself the power of its own expression.” That “Word” in the first verse of the Book of John is Christ. “In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God.”

Now turn to Isaiah 55:11. “So shall my word be that goes forth from my mouth; it shall not return to me empty, but it shall accomplish that which I purposed and fulfill that where I sent it.” So the word when it comes is The Word called Christ. I tell you the story, believe it. The minute you believe it you have accepted it, it has fallen on fertile ground. It will then take root; and the word contains within itself the power of its own expression. The whole vast program of God for man’s salvation is contained in that Word, “the seed”, and it falls upon man and man hears it. He either believes it or he rejects it." - the fourfold gospel 1963

Here he's talking about Christ being a branch, a stamp, a root. He says it's unfolded by believing the story, or the metaphysics, or recognizing the pattern exists within yourself that's innate to unfold. What is that pattern? Your innate capacity to be yourself, to view reality from a higher ideal instead of conforming to conditions in the expectations of the world. You expand beyond the limits of the world, and thus in turn embody more of that Christ seed. In the beginning was the pattern, and the pattern was with God and the pattern was God. So he says that when we believe that we are God, that immortal nature of emanation, then we merge more with that immortal nature. You contemplate on BEING it. Think about that. That "feeling" of seeing yourself behind yourself almost, as you do in gazing. That feeling I believe, of "contemplating" or more or less "feeling" as though you're a greater being than you are, that I believe is "believing in him" and praying to him in the most direct sense. I believe. Faith is as NG said the only way to please God, and if faith in him and belief, AKA operating from this level of self acceptance fully, then that would overlap would it not? Seeing your capacity for a life of satisfaction as self and seeing yourself beyond that character as God as the underlying themes of expression contained within that life.

I believe that seeing yourself as beyond the man you see yourself as now is a functional expression, while still operating as self in this iteration to the degree you can. That's what I'd say is belief and faith in him.

"Now, the day we really believe it and are bold enough to walk in that Name, there will be peace in the world. If we turn on the outside to an external God, there will be war in the world. For you have denied me and when you deny the real God there is confusion and conflict in the world. So any man who turns to a power outside of himself and bows before it as some sacred relic or some sacred object, or in any other way turns to it, he worships idols, for the living God is within you. Ye are the temple of the living God. He’s not outside and to look on the outside is to be led astray, and when you are led astray, you are led into confusion and nothing but confusion would result and, therefore, conflict and war." - the four mighty ones 1956

This is why he talks over and over about seeing God as your creative power. Being yourself and seeing yourself beyond your current limits and owning your vision for life opens this up, but not through the law as he said since faith and operating as a corporeal being in this world isn't having faith in him which I've quoted NG saying before. There's an important element here it seems about seeing yourself as God. Now from a traditional alchemy perspective this means much more than just belief, it means direct experience of God, in the sense of theurgy for example where you experience God in watered down forms that present to you the different aspects of God to integrate and thus "experience" God and having faith in him. That's how the theurgy work applies to this idea, which is far beyond just a subjective sensation of belief and viewing reality beyond this limited being.

"Ecclesiastes gives us this rule: “Even in your thought do not curse the king, or in your bed chamber curse the rich, for a bird will carry your voice or some winged creature tell the matter.” And Mark gives us another, as: “Whatever you desire, believe that you have received it and you will.” If you must believe you have received your desire in order to attain it, then you must start your game by believing it is finished. You must feel yourself into and partaking of your goal. And you must persist in that feeling in order to achieve it." - the game of life 1969

Here's another example of persistence. This to me sounds exactly like what I teach before, about remaining fixated on expanding into the vision you have for your life and you'll want to involve in that. I naturally want to, we all do, so that's part of it.

"Now, in order to play the game of life, you must know what you want to replace what you have. When you know what it is, you must assume the feeling that you have it. Although your reason and senses will deny its existence, persistence will cause your assumption to harden into fact and objectify itself upon your screen of space. Play the game this way. You may think it doesn’t work, but that’s because you have not tried it. You may believe the idea is stupid, but I tell you: the mood decides your fortune. Believe me, for I have proved this principle over and over again in my life.

It was Winston Churchill who galvanized the Western world by putting his words into practice. In spite of the horrors and bombing in London, Mr. Churchill sustained the mood of victory, and even in the darkest days he would not waver. Knowing the mood would externalize itself around the world, he sustained the mood . . while his opponents, not knowing the law, put their trust in armies and machinery of war.

Mr. Churchill’s wonderful statement, recorded in the “New York Times,” has proved itself to me. By simply catching the mood I have changed the circumstances of my life. Now I teach others how to do it. I invite you to ask yourself how you would feel if your desire was now fulfilled. Toy with the thought. Play with it a while and the mood will come upon you. Keep that mood by playing with the senses it evokes, and watch your world change to match your new mood."

Yeah no chance NG knew what Churchill was thinking. I won't go into how parasitic the life of Churchill was here but he wasn't a very "positive" person and wanted to kill millions as was stated. We need to be aware of NG placing his ideology onto others who he cannot prove to be the case of how they operated.

We do need to be aware. Believing in God within and operating the law is NOT the same thing. People in this space talk about believing in God as imagination to make the law work but that's not what NG said. There's different degrees and targets of belief. Belief and faith in God is the ONLY way to unfold the promise and birth the Christ child according to him as I've endlessly quoted. NG did say then the more you have faith in God as imagination then the more easily you'll operate the law.

"The lady who learned how to use the law saw it perfectly, too. The law operates by faith. If you believe, no effort is necessary to see the fulfillment of your every desire. If you go to the bank and have money deposited there equal to your check, you will give them your check in the belief that . . because of your faith . . they will give you the money you desire. Treat your desire in the same manner. Knowing your desire exists in your imagination, simply expect its fulfillment in your outer world. Try it. I have lived by this law all of my life and know, that by applying this principle, all of your desires will be fulfilled." - the heart of the dreamer 1969

An example of NG saying that the law operates by faith, but faith in the vision of the desire, not in the vision of God. If passive reactions can manifest through the law, seedtime, then faith in God isn't necessary to operate it, but faith in him is needed to unfold the promise. Integrating the different parts of God I believe is what all the scriptural prophesy is related to, not just random events. They represent attainments of expansion. I will still argue that being yourself and being as God are one in the same thing, since it's the power of God as Christ that unfolds in you as the individuated expression of God. You operate as self and that's taking in the power of God, though once again there's this level of belief in him as you that's needed according to how faith is needed to please him. Following the inner guidance mechanism is part of that expansion, through integrating those aspects of self in higher proportion. NG would seem to have us believe in some instances that they're separate, but I just don't see that entirely, but I can on some levels too. Mediating this seeming contradiction is pretty simple when you recognize that the traditionally alchemical view has always been that exposure to more of self is exposure to God and thus you'll have faith in him through experience with him. So NG is telling us here seemingly that operating the law and believing in God as you will open faith, but he also said that faith cannot be expressed through operating the law to get things in the world since you can do it without belief in Christ still, as we all do before we know this. So then in his own doctrine you have to effectively know you're God for that to work, but he says that the timing is predetermined and you cannot accelerate it. Thing is that he also has said you can speed it up.

"revision is repentance" he says.

Alright so here's an explanation.

So if Christ is the power of God and is God, the meaning, the Logos, David, then we must recognize this simple fact. If believing in him to operate the law and fulfil the promise is feeling into correct being and operating as yourself, then ripeness of the Christ seed MUST therefore relate to operating on that higher eternal state at baseline and merging the substances into one quintessence. The seed is the pattern of inner alchemy and that's operated through cutting through the expectations of the world in accepting the innate nature that the desire/pressure to expand is driving you through. Belief in him is belief in yourself, belief in unfolding that pressure into something functional and satisfying, which anchors the shen and expands the subconscious mind at baseline to some degree or another each cycle. NG says that without faith in God then Christ cannot be born. Through all of this you eventually learn that you're not of this world and that you are greater the more processed you are by that pressure to expand. The ripeness is natural, of recognizing that you're above all the expectations of this world and you transform accordingly. So belief in him is always a function of ripeness, and that ripeness is expanded through seeing beyond the world, while mastering operating in the world, using the law to "cushion the blows of life" while you hold faith in him no matter what. Overlapping eternal states is doing this mechanically from a traditional alchemical view.

"Housed in you, a human being, is the Christ-seed, which will bud and flower into fulfillment as Jesus the Lord. Until David is formed in you, you can describe Christ in many ways, but “No one can say ‘Jesus is Lord’ except by the Holy Spirit.” This is true, for the Holy Spirit brings to your remembrance all that you were told in the beginning." - an assured understanding 1969

So here he's talking about until David is formed, the "brother" of Christ who looks at you when you've unfolded the complete pattern and calls you the Father. David the personification of the complete expression of the Christ seed as the individuated nature taken up into the higher order states where ripeness is complete. Ripeness accelerates through operating in higher states, which involves cutting through conditions, which is dropping the need to play into the roles of others, which is the feeling and overlaps the sun and the moon to expand earth where the ferment of the immortal starlight can transform the sun beyond its resting place. The alchemist has made this clear to me, that all of the higher order work is taking base elements up into higher order states which is how acceleration of ripeness is really attained. Operating as the sun in the earth container exposes the sun to higher pressure and depth of experience which in itself opens up more faith in God as innate because of the nature of the non physical experiences. This is also partly why gazing works that process as well on various levels.

"Every child born of woman contains this incorruptible Christ-seed which possesses the power of self-expression and self-development. And every man is destined to mature and become his own father. If you come out of humanity, then humanity is your father; and if the symbol of humanity is David, and you come out of David, then he is your father . . but not forever. Having planted the Christ-seed in humanity, in time it will bud and flower and bring to fulfillment all that was contained within it. And when humanity has done his job completely, you will look back to see David . . he who fathered you in the world of time . . standing before you and calling you Father. Then you will have matured, for you will have become your own father’s Father. That is the mystery of Christ; for the Lord, speaking through his prophet Samuel, told you that when you are gathered together and lie down with your fathers, “I will raise up your son after you who shall come forth from your body. I will be his Father and he shall be my son.” Coming out of your body, he seems to be your son, but he is the one who is made to say: “My Father is he who you call God, for I know my Father, as he and I are one.”

Everyone will one day discover that he is God the Father, whose son is humanity, brought into focus as a single being called David. I hope you understand, as I cannot spell it out any clearer. I am telling you of my experiences of scripture. I am not manufacturing them, adding to, or speculating about them, but explaining scripture as clearly as I possibly can; for I, like Paul, strive for you, that you may have all the riches of an assured understanding and the knowledge of God’s mystery of Christ.

The term, “God’s mystery of Christ” is used to express both the human race and the individual who attained the ideal David represents. The human race certainly is not ideal. It is scattered and always at war, but when the race is finished, its experiences are brought together into one single, beautiful being. While humanity is scattered its beauty cannot be seen, but at the journey’s end all of its horror is brought together and personified as a glorious youth called David, the son of God, who is God himself.

It was God who buried himself in humanity, and at the end God comes out of humanity. Coming out, he is humanity’s son; but when David appears, he is God’s son, revealing his father. When that Christ-seed blossoms and fruits in you, individually, you will share the fruit of your labor by telling everyone who will listen to you of the mystery of Christ." - same lecture

So here we have David as representing humanity in completion, the product of your subconscious experience as all you thematically have available to experience on the outer world. David being humanity, all expressions of God as fractal representations, is actually the father while you're transforming. You being the sun, lesser yang, and that lesser yang as the sun contained in humanity must expand beyond humanity, to which then humanity can look up at you as God, and you back at David and see David calling you father as you adone the robe of glory. Ok so NG saying that David is the father of you as humanity which has the Christ seed in humanity, would imply then that the sun is buried within the waters of humanity, and that humanity carries the sun into maturity as God is revealed in him from that expansion. So in this case,

"In the Book of Samuel we read: “When you lie down with your fathers I will raise up after you your son, who will come forth from your body. I will be his father and he shall be my son.” Now we jump to the Book of Revelation, where the Lord is speaking, saying: “I AM the root and the offspring of David.” I AM the root, the cause which is the father. And I AM the offspring of my son, David; therefore I AM one with my grandson. All of the members of the human race are fused together into a single being called David. And what comes out of that? David’s offspring. If David’s root is the Lord, what comes out of David must be one with his root, so I AM the root and the offspring. I AM the grandfather and the grandson and David is my son. Man matures when he becomes his grandfather, for the grandfather is the Lord." - a divine event 1969

So here God is saying that he is the root (cause of all) and the offspring (product) of David. David is the son which houses then the sun by which the sun becomes the Star. The star in the stone (philosophers). So if all of humanity is all "fused together" into David, then that would mean functionally they're all contained within David, as David? The container that houses for maturation the lesser sun of everyone in humanity. This cannot be the subconscious level I do not believe, though the superconscious level is possible. I need to dig deeper.

"The day will come when you will awake to know this to be true; for David, the sum total of all of the experiences you have had in your dream of being man, will stand before you and call you “Father”. Then you will fulfill the 89th Psalm knowing, “I have found David. He has cried unto me, ‘Thou art my Father, my God and the Rock of my salvation.’ “Having played all the parts of Man, humanity, fused into a single youth, reveals your Godhood." - a movement of mind 1969

Yeah I know that I've read many times that David is the total of all experiences. This would be stored in the container that the higher genius holds. The alchemist has talked about how every experience of your iterations are "uploaded" to higher genius and those becomes available to you in the next iteration. This container might very closely relate to that aspect of David, the container for housing human experience as this works. David to me sounds very similarly to superconscious mind, but I cannot be sure there's direct overlap. The metaphysics is so difficult to explore with these things without a clear explanation between traditional alchemy and such. So if Mary in scripture relates to the personification of the INTELLIEGNCE of the subconscious mind, then perhaps the intelligence of David can relate to that which births the Christ child which according to scripture Christ came from David and David X Mary would be higher yang and higher yin together overlapping. The substances which generate the Christ child and yet are also contained within the seed as the pattern of God. That right there overlaps almost 100% perfectly with traditional alchemy. My grasp of David is that David is the superconscious mind, or at least the intelligence you'd overlap biblically to open up those capacities and states by dwelling there.

"As the Father, you will know that your son has always done your will; for you will have found in David, the son of Jesse (I AM) one who has done all your will. You, the Father, dreamed it and you, the son. played all the parts. And when the play is over you awake to come out of Golgotha to be born from above. Peter tells us: “We are born anew through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead.” While the world worships him as someone coming from without, you will find him rising from within . . not as another, but as your very Self, the dreamer of life." - same lecture

So this one also directly overlaps what I said before. Father emanates and "extends" as the alchemist says and the components that are created as a result of that extension include David and such which are necessary to overlap together to create the Christ child, hence how David births Christ and yet is also created by God. It doesn't contradict at all it's 100% consistent with traditional alchemy. He calls Christ the imagination, but remember Christ being the capacity that holds all the primary elements as extensions of God is also all of those parts, just separated. When NG talks about Christ being imagination and all that then it can makes sense, here, since he's talked about the subconscious being structural and a realm of its own then it would make sense to be the subconscious.

"Matthew and Luke tell the story of the birth as a woman called Mary giving birth to a little child who was different, yet born as we were born. But when you read the story in John (the most profound of all the New Testament writers) you discover where the birth takes place, and who Mary really is. Mary is the skull, the womb God entered. Blake said: “God Himself entered death’s door with those who enter. And he laid down in the grave with them in visions of eternity until they awake and see Jesus and the linen clothes lying there which the female had woven for them.” My mother wove this fleshly garment that I wear, and when I came forth it was from her womb; then the placenta followed. It had to be discharged, for it has no part of the earth. So it is with the napkin, telling you here that an unusual birth has taken place in the skull, where the drama began and ends!" - All that you behold 1969

So here he calls Mary the skull interestingly. He calls Mary the skull because he says that Christ is born in the skull. Elementally that's not really the case but I guess you could make a case for it in this sense. The brain is the sea of marrow and is a clear manifestation of Jing of the substantive aspect that provides us vitality. If Mary gives birth to Christ and we just went over David being involved in being the son of God and if God impregnated Mary to birth Christ then it must be through the exposure of Mary the subconscious level to the stellar level that the impregnation works until complete ripeness is attained. When Blake said that the Mother wove the linen clothes that Christ wears, it's obviously talking about the substantive yin aspect. Mother always being yin, a container. The greater sun or the air can also be a container as well, though according to NG David is the representation of all the suns of God, sons, which are housed in the son until the sun becomes stellar.

This whole thing has like 3 different levels of expression. Physical, psychological, and then elemental alchemical. Seedline, NG bible doctrine, alchemical traditional interpretation. There's at last 3 valid models.

"There is only one Spirit. The Spirit of Man and the Spirit of God are the same. God’s first great conception is recorded in the Old Testament as a foreshadowing of the event described in the first chapter of the Book of Luke, which tells the story of an angel of the Lord who speaks to Mary, saying: “Fear not, for you have found favor with God. You will conceive and bear a son and call his name Jesus.” Wondering how this could be, since she had no husband, the angel explains the theory of supernatural conception, saying: “The Holy Spirit will come upon you and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born of you will be called holy, the Son of God.” Now, the phrase, “come upon” and the word “overshadow” are the same by definition, and mean “superimposition; to be superimposed upon leaving your imprint, your seal.”

In the 33rd chapter of the Book of Exodus, the Lord speaks to Moses, saying: “I will put you in a cleft of the rock and cover you with my hand, and when I have passed by I will remove my hand and you will see my back. You cannot see my glory, but you will see my back.” This is the identical story of the angel and Mary. “I will put you in a cleft of the rock.” In Hebrew the word “cleft” means “to bore; to penetrate; to pierce a quarry.” And the phrase “I will cover you with my hands” means “copulation.” Here is the creative act stated in the New Testament as: “The power of the Most High will overshadow you” for this act is “superimposition of oneself upon a being.”" - conception 1968

So the spirit of man and the spirit of God are the same, though as he said before about divine imagination and human imagination the difference is intensity. Intensity here in my eyes relates to a measure of exposure and availability of higher states to be accessed and intensity is operating from those higher states of eternity. So here he's talking endlessly about how Mary is used to birth the Christ child. From the NG doctrine that's the skull, with the alchemical interpretation that's the subconscious mind itself that's available to access through for example gazing and other methods.

"It is difficult for man to understand that God’s creative power is personalized; that anyone raised from the dead and incorporated into the body of love is Jesus Christ, creating! In her vision everyone appeared to be dead, yet union had been consummated. All things are possible to God! By burying his creative power in them, he turns death into sleep and sleep into wakefulness and wakefulness into resurrection." - same lecture

Here's another example of NG talking about being incorporated into the body of love which we've established from prior quotes that this level of attainment is required to be able to pull people around like puppets and make them walk off cliffs like lemmings as he said. He said that you cannot do that until you've been incorporated into the body, so belief in him is ripeness and that ripeness is the attainment of these state overlaps which makes sense from the traditional alchemical view I've been talking about endlessly since the start of RS.

"So, I sit down in my chair and I see before me what is not physically before me, and then I am turned around. This outer garment . . Neville . . was put through all the paces from seven to twenty-one, and then came this fulfillment of July 21st of this year (the birth of the Babe out of my own being) and I saw the complete separation of that little one called Jesus Christ from that which is Esau. Out of Esau came Jacob, and out of Mary comes Jesus Christ, and both come from a separation or a tearing away. It has nothing to do with dogma. Do you want it to be? Well, you name it, identify yourself with it; completely absorb yourself with it. The outer man cannot do it, so the inner man has done it, for he has commanded that “you shall serve your brother.” This hairy garment comes first and then comes the one you cannot see, and that is Jacob. So no matter who you are, this is the plan of God to awaken sons. This outer world seems to come first, but it comes to awaken God who created it. When he individualizes himself, what he wants most is Jacob. The whole of the physical world is completed, and we are told it is now melting in radiation, and then when the yoke is taken from Esau’s neck, he is dead." - Easu and Jacob 1959

So here's NG telling us once again that Christ comes out of Mary. He said that Esau is separated from Christ, which I don't think I'd say is a separation but more of an integration. The Easu relates closely to the water.

"Now you will carry on when I am gone and you will be asked about him. When they ask you if you believe that a man called Jesus Christ was born of Mary, lived, and was crucified on a wooden cross, tell them the true story of salvation. You can, for you will be witnesses! You will have been born form above. You will have found David, who calls you Father. You will have been split in two, ascended into heaven, and witnessed the descent of the dove. When you have had all of these experiences you will be witnesses to the truth of God’s word. As a witness, you are the fruit of the tree of life upon which Jesus Christ (as God’s eternal plan) was crucified." - Jesus Christ 1968

Another example of him talking about Mary and David and Christ. If Christ is born of Mary then Mary is an attainment of expansion of consciousness, just as is David and consciousness is being aware of more at once, more of yourself, both as God and as your unique individuated identity. Mastering the unique individuated identity leads to the mastering of the Christ seed as that is how you begin to overlap the higher order states of Mary and David.

"So to you who are teaching now and to those who will follow, mark my words, you are going to be asked: “Don’t you believe in Jesus Christ as a man whose mother was Mary?”" - same lecture

Mother was Mary. Another example of that.

"Now, a lady recently shared a perfectly marvelous experience with me, saying: “I saw myself come out of myself as an old woman, holding a child in her arms. Although I saw her as another, I knew her as myself.” This is a perfect vision of the 18th chapter of Genesis. Sarah was an old woman. It had long since ceased to be with her after the manner of women, yet she brought forth the promised child. In this chapter God speaks to Abraham, and as he tells him of the promise, it turns from the first into the third person. It is said that Sarah laughed because she and Abraham were old. At the time she did not recognize the Lord; but when the one speaking of him in the third person says: “Is anything too hard for the Lord?” Sarah recognized him and doubted no more. This lady had the vision of Sarah, and will now have the experience of Mary and bear the promised child. That same night, as she closed her eyes, she saw a huge ear, a hammer, and a spike. As she watched, invisible hands drove the spike through the ear. Although she knew the ear was hers, it did not hurt. By that act, this lady fulfilled the 40th chapter of the Book of Psalms, for if you read the footnote you will see that ears will be bored for you. This is done for you to hear the word, coming uninterrupted from within." - My word 1968

Mary is to bear the Christ child. Once again another example. Mary with everything I've known is the subconscious mind, the intelligence of it at least. Here you also see him saying that the Child saw Mary as himself who also have birth to him as well, so it's the extension as the pattern and then the pattern folding out into its capacity here. Here he also talks about the promised Child. The "promise". If Abraham is promised to be the father of many great nations, and nations can also be seen as those higher states, then it wouldn't surprise me that out of Abraham (follow the lineage) comes Christ because we start off with Abraham and as we expand we get closer to David and Mary as the higher order states. Makes sense.

"This man is mad, for he claims he came down from heaven, yet we know his father Joseph and his mother Mary. He claims that he existed before our father Abraham. How could one living in this century say that David, one who preceded him by 2,000 years, be [sic] his son?" - no other foundation 1969

Here's him talking about how Joseph is actually the father. I do not know where to place Joseph on the state scale.

"As I go across this country the one question that is always asked me, whether it is a social gathering or any place: “Well, don’t you believe in a physical Jesus?” No matter where I go, I get it. I go to a small little dinner party of four or five . . “I know what you say Neville, but don’t you really believe that he did live, that he walked this earth 2,000 years ago and was called Jesus, and his mother was Mary and his father was Joseph . . or maybe it wasn’t Joseph?” To the unprepared mind, how can you explain what Paul said in the first three verses of the 3rd chapter of Galatians: “O foolish Galatians who has bewitched you?” For they went astray to some physical sense: “Before whose eyes Jesus Christ was publicly portrayed as crucified.” Now I ask you one thing: Did you receive the spirit from those works of the Lord, or by hearing with faith? Are you so foolish, having begun with the spirit are you now ending with the flesh?” For the whole vast world today is ending with the flesh and they can’t see the spirit which is Christ Jesus." - Paul's autobiography 1963

NG now says that Joseph "maybe wasn't" the father.

Look here's something. Whenever you believe in Christ, in imagination, you're overlapping states to SOME degree, If the power of God operates through Christ and all changes in state manifest change in the world and imagination is the "realm" that this is all contained in as a structure that's rearranged through altering the relationship in the field geometry to the pattern, then any time Christ is in action then you're operating ripeness are you not? You're reorienting the structure of the field geometry which then alters the response you'll have. We're told that faith in God pleases God, ripens you into that Christ seed capacity being realized, and thus wouldn't it alchemically not have that same function of working ripeness? From my understanding, gazing is working "imagination" and having faith in him on the functional alchemy level since you're overlapping states.

Now, let us go into the story and find out what he means by it. Mary wonders, “How is this thing possible, seeing that I know not a man?” And the Angel said to her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. Therefore the child to be born will be called Holy, the Son of God.”

Here he tells us the theory of supernatural conception, how it’s done. The power of the Most High he equates with the Holy Spirit, and in his benediction, now, he is wishing us to have this experience . . the experience of Mary. So, the office of the Holy Spirit is that the sons of God, by union with their Father, may by His grace become their own father. That is what he is asking for everyone in the world. If you would actually transcend this level and enter what is called “the Kingdom of Heaven,” or the New Age, you do it with the body you wear here, and you can only do it by a complete transformation and a radical transformation, which is brought about through union with the Father. And he tells us, the Father is all Love.

“And love of God” . . that’s the Father. He emphasizes the Holy Spirit as the office by which this union is brought about, as told us in the story of Mary: that “the Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you.” Now the power of the Most High is called Christ Jesus, for we are told, “Christ is the power of God and the wisdom of God.”

“Who touched me? for I perceive that force” . . that creative power . . “has gone out of me,” because someone touched him. Here is an actual creative act. On this level, it offends people, but on the highest level it is the most radiant, glorious, ecstatic event that you can ever conceive of, for you are being lifted up to an entirely different level.

On this level, it would seem immoral, incest, and here, the story is telling us, if we know the story as one should know it, that he who came out of his mother, as you are told in the story, was her Husband. He was his own father. “I and my Father are one.” For, did he not say, all things were made by Him, and without Him was not one thing made that was made?

So, here, who then is Mary? Are we not Mary? Are we not the emanation of God, from whom God hid His face only for a moment, for a short while? As we are told in the 54th chapter of the book of Isaiah, “Sing, O barren, and those who have not borne. Break forth into singing. You have not been in travail, for your Maker is your Husband; the Lord of Hosts is His name.”

So, here we are the “barren ones.” We haven’t brought forth the Promise. The Promise was a son. That was the Promise made to Abraham, the beginning of it all. And man waits and waits and waits, and he gives up in despair, because he hadn’t brought forth the son." - Paul's prayer interpreted unknown date

So this is interesting. I remember the alchemist was talking about the holy spirit to be earth I believe.

"Now he tells us the time has come, and when it came, then there is a method, a definite method, by which it appears in the world, and the Great Lover finds you, and in spite of your evasions and your resistance, you are now one with Him. There is union between the Father and the Son, for He is going to make the Son one with Himself. And this union is an embrace of love, so he incorporates the three states: “and the love of God” . . he puts that into the benediction. And Love embraces you. That is, by the office of the Holy Spirit, who impregnates you, for you fuse with the Father, and you become one body with Him.

That fusion is oneness. You put Him on just as you would a garment. As you are told in Scripture, “All who are baptized into Christ put on Christ.” So, the first event recorded in the Gospel, after the prelude of the mission of John, is that of baptism. This is the baptism. So we are told as John is coming to the end of his picture: “He on whom you see the Spirit descend and remain, he will baptize you with the Holy Spirit.”

Here is a secret. He tells you it’s a mystery. “He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit.” He is the Holy Spirit. Therefore, He is the one who impregnates you. He impregnates you with an embrace after you have actually answered correctly, which is: Love is the greatest thing in the world. So, he incorporates into the benediction, “and the love of God.” He starts off with the Son first, then he comes to God the Father, and calls it Love, and then he comes to the Holy Spirit, and he calls that now, “participating in the Holy Spirit.” And he calls it a fellowship, a union." - same lecture

Here's NG telling us that the baptism is basically putting on the spirit, being immersed in the spirit. Baptism is wearing the expansion of that immersion.

"You cannot separate the dreamer from God, and all dreams proceed from Him. Some are simple and need no interpretation, while others are revealed in a symbolic language and need an interpreter, as told us in the story of Joseph. His true identity is revealed when he looked into the faces of those who had had a dream and saw they were disturbed, for he said: “Do not interpretations belong to God? Tell me your dream.” Then he interpreted the dreams of the butler, the baker, and even Pharaoh himself, and they all came to pass just as he had said they would. Now, if only God can interpret a dream, why tell Joseph? Because he is a personification of God. His name was changed from Joseph (meaning “salvation”) to Joshua, which means “Jehovah is salvation.”" - A movement of mind 1969

Well right here we've figured out who birthed Christ as the father. Yeah it was the Father, yet also David. Joseph is God in scripture, the Father of Christ. Joshua is also God, salvation pattern unfolding. The Father. I guess that's why they all have J in their names. Jod. God.

So much work @_@ such little profits. Damn everything that tried to keep me down I'll harbor the truth until the end no matter what.

"Jacob cannot fail. A cue is given to us as to who he is when we see the one of the twelve sons he loved most. He loved Joseph most of all, for Joseph was the comfort of his old age. Joseph was born of the woman he wanted most, but in his conflict he had to marry Leah. Then, after he had served another seven years . . seven for Leah . . he was tricked. As he had tricked the father-in-law, the father-in-law tricked him. Then he had to serve another seven years, this time to get Rachael; and out of Rachel comes Joseph and his last, Benjamin. But Joseph was his love, the joy of his old age, and Joseph was a dreamer. Listen to the words: “Behold this dreamer cometh, let us sell him, let us kill him.” He could not only dream, he could interpret dreams, for this faculty in man that dreams is man’s imagination, and any interpreter of dreams is man’s imagination. “Behold the dreamer cometh, let us kill him.” Judah says: “No”, let us sell him to the Ishmaelites as the caravan moves on toward Egypt.” So they sold him, the dreamer. That is what everyone does in this world. But the dreamer rose to the heights of wealth and saved them in their famine. So, the dreamer in man will save him . . that’s Joseph. But what a long trail in time between the moment when they sold the dreamer into slavery to the one called David . . who brings out the darkness, who brings out the Edomite, and makes for himself a name of names in all of Israel. So God said of him: “I have found a man after my own heart.”" - Esau Jacob Israel 1963

More on Joseph.

"What is the technique? In my 21st year when I meditated I became identified with the bliss I contemplated as a sea of golden liquid light. Then I understood. Absorption! That was the secret. If I became completely identified with a state . . and named it . . to the degree that I became absorbed . . it worked. What became absorbed? Not the garment . . Esau. It was Jacob, which is all Imagining. Jacob had to be separated from Esau. “Two nations are in your womb, and two peoples, born of you, shall be divided; the one shall be stronger than the other; the elder shall serve the younger.”" - Easu and Jacob 1959

Here's NG telling us more on Jacob. Jacob is the imagination, inner guidance system, and Easu is the outer world.

"When this division takes place in you, that is God, and you do not need the help of anyone. For everything came upon Jacob, and only the sword was given to Esau. So this Esau (the body) takes food into his stomach and it must be transformed into bone and blood. It is a stormy process. And the very moment that he breaks loose from the yoke Jacob has placed on his neck, Esau is dead. It does not matter, for the immortal you is Jacob and you cannot cease to be. Let no one tell you that money or anything else is wrong if Jacob wants to exercise his talent for that. Every Esau has to serve Jacob. If you find Jacob and you dwell in the state and become completely absorbed in it, all the Esaus have to serve you to fulfill that state, and no power in the world can stop it. Read it carefully. “You shall live by the sword, and you shall serve your brother.”" - same lecture

So here's NG telling us that the immortal is Jacob. It's like the immortal capacity exists in the seed all through the states but is at different capacities or something. These are all the Christ seed in varying aspects anyway so.

"Esau had to marry the Canaanite, and the word means, “that which would humiliate,” but whom did Jacob marry . . that which came out of Laban . . the ideal of the world. The “garments” marry the Canaanite. If my old teacher, Ab, were here, he would frighten you to death. He used to say, “If anyone stands before you, and you think him so important, strip him and let him perform the normal functions of life . . and you will turn your back on him.” Jacob commands the world and Jacob is Imagination. No one has ever seen Jacob because he is like his Father, completely invisible, and then you arrive at the point where you discover your own invisibility." - same lecture

Something on Abdullah. Hear what Abdullah said though. That's interesting. That is actually what I teach too, to strip the person of their power, to disregard their expectation and throw it back at them so they have no way of preventing you from unfolding the capacity within. So is Jacob then, referencing this invisible power, simply then the aetheric body? I have no clue to be honest. I've not heard any frame of reference. If we look at what Jacob does, Jacob births the 12 tribes and is later named to Israel. Jacob becomes transformed through "wresting with God".

"The next time we see it is in the 32nd chapter of Genesis. This is the night, we are told, a man called Jacob (the supplanter) wrestled with God, and when it came to the breaking of the day God said to him: “Let me depart.” And he said: “I will not let you depart until you bless me.” And God blessed him. Then he said to God: “What is your name?” and God answered: “Why do you ask my name?” He would not tell him, so Jacob called the spot where God touched him “Peniel,” which means “the face of God,” for said he “I have seen God face to face and yet my life is preserved.” Then as the sun rose Jacob faltered because where God had touched shrank. It was the sinew upon his thigh. That is what man at that level of consciousness believed to be the creative power of the universe." - his name 1963

Here's some answers. Jacob, become Israel, is a level of consciousness, A LEVEL. Degrees of expansion, and thus able to operate the law more effectively as it's told. I've always said that the attainment of immortality should make life like a lucid dream, though involvement to some degree or another has and will always be necessary since that's just the nature of how our existence is. While we're in lower states then more involvement is necessary to reach higher levels.

"So, if you are ever in doubt, use that as your rule, and you can’t go wrong; and then the day will come that you and I will meet “on high.” Then you will be able to understand Scripture. Here’s the one who said, “I AM from above, and you are from below. I AM not of this world; you are of this world.” Do you think one man is talking to men? No; it is one Being speaking to Himself. Here is the “outer man” called Neville who came into the world first. This is the “Esau” of Scripture. And then after that, comes another one, . . my own wonderful human imagination; and that’s the “Jacob.” This is the “twin” that comes into the world. They aren’t two separate little boys. This is the story; this is an adumbration of that which comes later into the New Testament; that the one who could say, “I AM from above and you are from below; you are of this world; I AM not of this world.” So the Being that is speaking is your own wonderful human imagination that in Scripture is called “Jesus Christ.” And the “thing below” is the body that you are “wearing,” and that is “of this world.”

Now, you are anchored here. I will show you how I need not be anchored here, because these two, as we are told in Scripture:

“In thy limbs lie nations twain, rival races from their birth; one the mastery shall gain, the younger o’er the older reign.”

That’s from the 25th chapter of the Book of Genesis [Genesis 25:23, Moffatt’s translation].

Now we are told in the first book of Corinthians, the 15th chapter, that the “Second Man” is the Lord from Heaven, So, the second one who is mentioned in Genesis as Jacob, who became Israel as he wrestled successfully with the Lord, . . his name was changed from Jacob to Israel; he is that “Second Man.” He came second; Esau came first. Well, this [indicating the body] is the “Esau”; and it’s limited to its senses." - if any two agree 1971

So here's more on Esau and Jacob. Esau is also in dual seedline the source of Juize, who kill Christ in the flesh. So with this whole being 2 bodies, you can live in the aetheric body and expand that side more, which overlaps states, and shows faith in God since you're not then operating according to the flesh as the source of your truth. This seems to be what he's saying.

"Now, you take that 78th chapter of Psalms. The title of it is Asaph. That is, the Psalm is a Psalm of Asaph. “Asaph” means to gather together and to record, to take all the things and put them together. And then he said, “I will open up my mouth in a parable and utter dark sayings from of old,” . . dark sayings from of old, things that are difficult and hard to understand. Then, now, he goes through the entire story of Israel, as we call it in the Old Testament, and he tells the entire story, and he tells you it is a parable. He tells you they are dark sayings, hard to understand; and then he comes to the end . . it is a nice long chapter, . . and what does he say? “And the Lord awoke as from sleep, like a man rising out of strong drink.” And then he declared David. David is his Prince. David is his Shepherd over all the people.

At the very end, he records all the things through which man has gone, and then comes: “The Lord begins to awake,” and He awakes as one out of sleep, like one waking from wine, strong wine, . . as though it were a drunken sleep, where all things could happen; and then He awakes! And who does he call? He calls David. And the whole thing ends on the note of David, after the entire series of parables.

So, a parable is a story told as though it were true, letting the one who hears it wrestle with it, letting him discover the meaning behind the written word. It’s told as though it were true. Now, one has to discover the fiction from the fact. What is it trying to convey? It is telling a story. You will pass through the Red Sea. You will lift up the serpent in the wilderness. He is telling all these stories; and then it comes: “And then the Lord awakes.”

He awakes from the parable, and finds the kernel. He finds the truth; and then He calls David. So David comes into view, and David stands before you and calls you, Father. And the joy that comes upon you when you see your son standing before you, . . you have no other child, just David. For your child in this world is a brother." - Order then wait 1970

There's more on David here, as the brother which I talked about before, as well as the parables.

"In the Old Testament the story is told of Jacob who wrestled with the Lord and was touched on his thigh, causing it to shrink. Read this story carefully. Look up the word “thigh” in your Concordance and you will discover what is really being revealed. The truth is being told in a gentle manner so that the so-called “good” people of the world will not be shocked." - the heavenly vision 1968

Here's the God touching the thigh again as we read before. This from seedline doctrine studies reveals that this represents creative power, Jing, generative capacity to unfold, seed, reproductive ability. Why it caused it to shrink, I believe that's more to do with the creative capacity being internalized, like in Daoist systems when the phallus retracts in their mythos after ripeness is attained representing what I believe is the same alchemy.

"To change your present state you, like Dr. Millikan, must rise to a higher level of consciousness. This rise is accomplished by affirming that you already are what you want to be, and assuming the feeling of your fulfilled desire." - Arise unknown date

Well here we have it straight from the horses mouth. To rise to a higher level of consciousness, to experience the eternal states as they expand then we must accept the inner guidance system and master the desire, the pressure to expand. I wish I had the quote on hand where NG talked about desire being for expansion. I know I read it but I don't have a source.

This is NG saying that someone of higher consciousness is someone who's in mastery of the moods. This means drooping importance off the "facts of life" from other peoples projections.

"To change the present state we, like Dr. Millikan, must rise to a higher level of consciousness. This rise is accomplished by affirming that we are already that which we want to be; by assuming the feeling of the wish fulfilled. The drama of life is a psychological one which we bring to pass by our attitudes rather than by our acts. There is no escape from our present predicament except by a radical psychological transformation. Everything depends upon our attitude towards ourselves." - be who you wish to be, be what you believe 1951 radio lecture

Another example of how attitudes unfold, which are the result of the pathway cascades firing.

"We rise to a higher level of consciousness, not because we have curbed our passions, but because we have cultivated our virtues. In truth, a meek man is a man in complete control of his moods, and his moods are the highest, for he knows he must keep a high mood if he would walk with the highest." - same lecture

Here's him telling us to "keep" a high mood. Let me search this for other instances. I know he talks about how you can't be in any state eternally.

"Individuals, as well as communities, grow spiritually in proportion to their higher ideals. If your ideal is low, you sink to its depths, but if it is exalted, you are elevated to heights unimagined. You must keep a high mood if you would walk with the highest." - arise

There's the same thing again. So keeping a higher mood (response) is how you expand consciousness, though I'd say it's the other way around. A mood comes as a result of what's integrated, which acts can rearrange and this leads your habitual response then to settling into.

"I tell you the world you step into tonight when you put your head on a pillow is just as real as this one. Men claim it is a shadow and unreal, yet from these so-called dreams they interpret their state of consciousness. How can anyone interpret that which is unreal? The reality of that world as opposed to this one is solely produced from the level upon which consciousness is focused. If you are thinking from that world it seems the only reality. Focus your attention on this level, however, and that world will seem unreal. So, objectivity and subjectivity are solely determined by the level of consciousness upon which the individual is focused." - no other foundation 1968

Here he's saying that subjectivity and objectivity are products of the level of consciousness you're at. Focusing the level, the degree of "wonder" if you'd call it that. That seems to be what he's getting at. The alchemist has also eluded to this being a functional part of expansion into higher consciousness, where you will see the "wonder" in life more. I'd prefer to call it peace from what I've experienced. The alchemist nodded when I was talking about experiencing the peace, so it must closely relate. The peace feeling is something that stems from living more IN the subconscious level, by experiencing only what's "wonderful". I remember asking him about this thing that NG said about everything being wonderful and he said that it's like a method he teaches us that's related to what he calls "ascending". Now that's a big part of it according to both of them. That's once again not to deny what's going on and what needs attending to, but to not be "moved" by it is really the point. The response, the importance and the agitation isn't striking you because you're in peace. When you apply the ascending methods you literally feel "lighter" and floating, not in a sort of agitated unanchored sense but like you're just able to "breathe" easier not physically but psychically I guess. You're able to operate without small narrow view in a tiny room that's bouncing you around rapidly and agitating you. There's space to operate without expectations or conditions.

"The next step is now bringing it into solidity, which is the VAU. But how do I apply the name to the point where I can use the VAU in my name? I will assume that I am that man. When I walk in the assumption, I am walking in his Name. We are told in this state all will walk in the name of his God. I have found the Name . . found it within myself as, first, my awareness, my ability to become aware of something, my ability to become not only aware of it but to become aware of being it, so I walk as though I am the man that I want to be, so I solidify it, and the last letter only bears witness of the internal imagery, for the last letter is another HE, so there are two HE’s in the name, a JOD and a VAU. You cannot sound it . . Jehovah is not the name . . roughly translated it is I AM, but you have got to tear it apart and know what you mean by “I AM” for to say “GO and tell them “I AM” has sent you unto them.” When I go to Israel and they ask me who sent you, what is your thought? Just say “I AM” has sent me unto you and then complete it and tell them I AM that I AM. What does it mean . . I AM That? Yes, that is as it is because I AM as I AM. Were I different that would have to be different, so I AM that that mirrors the being that I AM, for what I see the world to be is a measure of my own level of consciousness, for whatever it is seen to be is a direct index to the level of consciousness of the observer of the world. It’s not the world . . I AM that . . I really AM,. . and that could not be other than what it is, while I remain as I am." - the four mighty ones 1956

Here's him talking about the level of consciousness being how you view the world then, but is that from the peace perspective? That's how it seems he's decoding it. Less importance on conditions. More acceptance of self, expansion into life the way that's satisfying and nourishing.

"The slightest change in my level of consciousness, the slightest change in the feeling of I AM this, results in a corresponding change in that, which is the world round about me. Let me now desire peace and actually walk in the name of peace, that there is peace in my world, and I will look upon a world and I will see peace where others see conflict, for I am only seeing that at all times: so what is my authority? My authority is “I AM has sent me unto you” and I AM that I AM. Do I know it? If I know it I will never complain. If I broke my neck I would know you could not have done it unto me: I did it unto myself. If I find myself in any state in the world I could not complain for I have found the Law, I have found the Name by which all these things are gathered together." - same lecture

Well here he's talking about peace now. Seeing peace where there is conflict. Moods. Charge phenomena and agitation. I wouldn't call it relaxation but more so, "integration" and acceptance of inner truth being all that matters at that point.

"Those not understanding it within themselves treat it so sacredly they will even cover the name as they unfold the scroll to read it. Have you ever gone to these wonderful churches and seen them reading a scroll that man himself wrote, for some rabbi wrote that down, yet when he comes to read it he will cover it, because he must not look upon the name of God. It’s a holy name. It’s not on paper. It’s not on the scroll. He can’t even utter it. It’s within him as his awareness, his ability to become aware of things, his ability to become aware of being the state of which formerly he was only aware of, and he walks as it and then he objectifies it and it becomes that, so I AM that I AM. So when a world is described from observation, it is always, as described, revealing the level of consciousness of the describing being. It is not the world . . that changes automatically . . if I, in one little way, change within myself." - same lecture

So here once again, he's telling us more or less that the whole operation of the so called law via imaginal acts is to operate more from this peace type state, mood, where charge is settled and stable in the shen. I've always said this brings about good luck, and I'd say this is an aspect of how that works. The change is from the field geometry charge level, where through experiencing the movement of current via implication in the pathway cascades, then you'll not react in the same dysfunctional ways and throw away your power to others expectations and compromise to keep them happy. Here we can see maintaining persistence and such more or less as deciding to respond without agitation to the world, but remaining fixed on the vision you have as inevitable, thus belief in him and expansion can unfold. In that sense, when you've reached this point of stability and detachment through going all the way then the conditions don't seem so scary. "Oh I can be myself after all".

"So think now of your personality as something that is informed by this mighty selfhood but informed by it, in respect to its level of consciousness in varying degrees. On one level I am informed as to the language of birds. On another level the language of trees, and on another level the language of the motion of clouds; every little formed cloud is telling me something. Every little ripple is telling me something. On a certain level the language is revealed. On a lower level it is simply an object moving in space. Lift up the object only, any object, and it takes on increasing significance . . and what a thrill when man so lifts himself that everything is talking and telling him of the kingdom within himself that not one little thing is by accident . . that the bird that seemingly is wild and simply lit in your yard just for a moment, on its way south or north, did not by accident light, it brought a message . . and every little thing in the world is telling you something when you rise in consciousness, and you rise in consciousness the day you find the Name and walk in it for “I will set him on high because he hath found my Name.” He knows my name. The only reason for the lifting up was the knowledge of the Name." - same lecture

Significance. Importance. Implication. Interesting right. So if implication relates directly to the experience of charge in the circuits and that an implication of negative association causes agitation then the significance is higher on that experience, the structure that's thematically associated to the channels that correspond on the field geometry level holds stagnation and charge that's causing agitation. So in the imaginal act, to experience the satisfaction, you're dissolving the agitation on the trash by recognizing you never needed to be that way to begin with.

"All things are made by your imagination, for without imagining, nothing is made. Imagination is not limited to this level of consciousness. There are levels and levels of imagination, as your dreams and visions prove. This world is sustained by Divine Imagining, which is human imagining on a higher level. Our imagination is keyed low, but we are called upon to exercise this power, to examine ourselves to see if we are keeping our faith. On this level, faith is not complete until, through experiment, it becomes experience. Experiment with this statement: “Whatever you desire, believe you have received it and you will.” (Mark 11) If faith is not complete until, through experiment it becomes experience, you must take an unseen objective and place it in an assemblage of mental states which would imply its fulfillment. Then this desire must be activated by entering into its center, feeling its reality, and walking in the faith that it will happen. I tell you: in a way you could not devise, what you have assumed will come into your world." - your maker 1969

So he's saying there's levels of consciousness and levels of imagination. Levels of imagination here relate to levels of consciousness I do believe. This quote right here above is very important. Faith requires experience. So then, this analysis of faith, in his words, is mostly about you accepting the implication of what your objective is to be complete. Here he mentions the desire being "activated" by stepping INTO it, AKA feeling the implication, the charge, and then certainty that comes in EFFECT. So anyone who's done this knows that certainty and stability and all that is a matter of "setup" and not so much conscious decisions being made moment to moment. It can be that way, though I'm going to argue that whatever your degree of agitation is at baseline will determine how far you can go with settling the charge and thus feeling the pathway cascades fire the "implication" of what you're experiencing to be "significant" for you or not. To deny the facts of the world is more or less stability of the psyche, which is through clearing the unconscious trash that binds us through implication to needing the expectations of others for self value. Therefore, once again, we can see that at the foundational level building up into higher levels of consciousness, the expansion happens through owning self in meaningful ways and dissolving importance of conditions of others against what we have as the objective. Trying to bypass that with some magical faith trick isn't a thing. You move current and then live from the result of this new arrangement of currents you now swim in or you don't.

So that's all connecting to what's been established. Faith in him isn't something separate, it's an effect of all of the transformation by accepting innate self, by cutting through expectations and owning the fact that those things don't matter. It seems to me that the more stable your shen is the more you're in a higher level of consciousness and have more faith. Faith is a condition of arrangement it seems, and cannot be "willed" really. Faith he pretty much says comes from experience and if experience that's implying nourishment is had then you'll be more stable because you're accepting more of self instead of throwing it away and giving it to the trash out there that suck the life out of you which you "consent" to as he says. So once again, all that you believe and consent to, represents this and nothing really else. This is functionally how the mechanics work. Belief in God is belief in the truth of the inner guidance mechanism, at least in the beginning, and as that unfolds the more you'll live in that truth of the higher states as a matter of transcending the limits of the world and the expectations others hold of you to conform to. You'll then likely have that peace feeling permeate you at baseline. Trying to force peace without there being a foundation to root into will cause peak dips, by ignoring conditioning that implies you're still throwing away your power mostly on an unconscious level since it's habit at that level. This means that as always, we start by getting real with how we feel to begin the ascension. This means moving currents to open up the implications of lack no longer holding importance to us, and this is what I've explained endlessly about what cutting through conditions means and how you do it. It's not difficult it just takes enough pressure to want to expand, and even NG said that our own dissatisfaction is needed to expand.

"All forms of creative imagination imply elements of feeling, for it is the ferment without which no creation is possible. There is nothing wrong with the desire to transcend your present state. The world would not progress without man’s dissatisfaction with himself." - Arise

"There is nothing wrong with our desire to transcend our present state. There would be no progress in this world were it not for man’s dissatisfaction with himself. It is natural for us to seek a more beautiful personal life; it is right that we wish for greater understanding, greater health, greater security. It is stated in the sixteenth chapter of the Gospel of St. John, “Heretofore have ye asked for nothing in my name; ask and ye shall receive, that your joy may be full.”" - be what you wish to be, be what you believe 1951 radio lecture

"So I tell you we must remember the story of the crucifixion. As Paul said: “I die daily.” I should be dissatisfied: I should have always a “divine dissatisfaction” and transcend and transcend, to become one of the awakened brothers. I cannot live on what I learned today. Extend the borders of your tent. Not only must I grow, but also I must also outgrow or I am not growing. Let no one tell you that this world is your end. You are a fabulous being. You do not change worlds by spatial travel; you change by a change in consciousness. Subjective or objective is determined by the level on which my consciousness is focused." - release Barabbas and crucify Jesus 1957

Wow that's interesting. The alchemist talks about "divine discontent" and Paul here talks about "divine dissatisfaction". NG tells us we SHOULD be dissatisfied, and as Paul says, to die daily. Transcend and transcend. There's also the subjective vs objective thing he talked about before that's determined by the level of consciousness. Intensity. Human vs divine imagination. Man we're really schooling all the fools with this one. We continue to push the limits of what's accepted, what's implied by who we're being, what's comfortable and involved with in life.

"But all day long you’re doing it anyway. Man is doing it, but he’s doing it asleep; and therefore when it comes into being and he harvests this marvelous . . well, whatever it is, he doesn’t recognize that he had anything to do with it. And the purpose of life is to become awake . . to wake everything in this world. So, I know exactly what I did. I sat down and I dreamed myself as affluent. I dreamed myself is this, as that, as the other, and having done it, I have confidence in God’s Law. No man can divert it. I can’t plant one thing and reap another." - awaken O sleeper 1968

So here's him talking about reaping what's planted inn the moment without seeming persistence again, unless that's implied.

"So, do it. Spend a little moment every day, and deliberately plant loving thoughts, loving seeds. Bring before your mind’s eye those that you know as friends. Represent them to yourself without their knowledge, without their consent, in some lovely manner. When they conform to that in the outer world, you don’t need praise. You don’t need to tell them, “That’s what I imagined for you.” You know. You have the satisfaction of knowing what you did; therefore they will conform to it, and you will see them, and you will reap it, and you’ll have the satisfaction, without having them feel obligated. If you tell them what you did, they will feel almost obligated to do something for you in turn. You don’t want anything in return." - same lecture

Look at that. Did you see what he said. He gave another example of an act about someone saying the "I imagined for you" thing and addressing this condition to make it happen. It's him telling people who think they need to imagine and then go tell them that this will happen to make it happen. That's another example of "don't lift a finger" type thing "to make it happen" as an example. You see this seems to be a pretty clear way to make it work, because obviously we need to lift a finger in many cases to manifest because that's just how things work here. All this work I'm doing I've put tens of thousands of hours "lifting a finger to make it happen". I just NEED to else RS couldn't exist, so that's why I am critical of this view and don't see taking it literally in a vacuum as the correct interpretation. When you see enough of these examples it brings the context with it, about him simply speaking to the people who hold those views as a condition against application. We know that sometimes you don't need to lift a finger, you can have fleeting thoughts make thins show up as I've told stories of here, but that's not always the case and natural striving will determine the degree of action necessary. Accepting and assuming the state of the wish fulfilled will move the currents, determine you to be clear in your truth and action will stem from that acceptance and not from the conditions of others. This is common sense really. We all know that you will need to act to make things happen, to build buildings, for example. Nobody can imagine building a house and "not lift a finger" that's just insanely stupid. So obviously NG is either insanely stupid or my interpretation of his words make it make sense.

"The entire drama of scripture unfolds in us and hasn’t a thing to do with any being that was mortal born. Christ in you who is your hope of glory is born from within, and does not walk the earth, as you who are born from the womb of woman. So who is Christ? This, the riddle of riddles, is asked all through scripture. In the Book of Proverbs the question is asked, “Who has established all of the ends of the earth? What is his name and what is his Son’s name? Surely you know.” Who has established all of the ends of the earth? The Father of fathers, one of infinite love, whose son is David. It is he who established all of the ends of the earth and sustains them from within you. You are his suffering servant, who is Himself." - a riddle 1969

So here's him calling us God's "suffering servant". He speaks of this a lot.

"Isaiah was not writing about a man of flesh, but was telling an eternal, immortal story. God himself is the suffering servant. He so loves you, he will not alter your imagination. If you imagine some horrible thing he will fulfill it, and because you have to experience all that you imagine he will suffer with you. Always allowing you to imagine, be it wisely or unwisely, he fulfills it with you. That is your suffering servant. But in the end, having gone through hell with you . . the one he loves most . . he rejoices, for when he comes out he and his emanation are one. This story makes no sense if seen only on the page of a book. It must be experienced to be understood." - the forming of Christ in you 1969

Here's him telling us that God will not "alter your imagination", but he will force the imaginal senses open when mystical experiences happen which NG did say were all involuntary so it's under the context of God basically making you imagine and react to implication in ways that would cause suffering. To cause you agitation needlessly, is what that more or less means. Also he said here "he and his emanation (extension) are one".

"Let me put this in a simple way: Tonight, when you look in the mirror, you will see Esau. The one who is looking in the mirror is Jacob. The word “Jacob” means “to supplant.” Jacob can supplant his physical reflection by replacing the one there with one he desires to experience. Loving Jacob, the Lord will mold Jacob into the likeness of what he is seeing, and you will become what you have been beholding." - same lecture

This is interesting. So he says that who you see on the external is Esau, and the one who's looking at the mirror behind the eyes is Jacob. Imagination. God. Christ. So Jacob he also characterizes as the observational awareness of self.

"All things are possible to you, because you are all imagination and imagination creates reality. Knowing what you want, imagine you have it. Knowing what you want to be, imagine you are it. Subjectively appropriate your objective hope and you have assumed a virtue you did not have. Ask no one to help, and do not feel below the water for something to fall back on if imagination doesn’t work. Instead, learn to count on your true Self, who is Jesus Christ!

Jesus, your own wonderful human imagination, is your hope of glory, and there is no other Christ. Defined as God’s power and wisdom, Imagination is in travail until Christ is formed in you. On that day your history will be changed from BC to AD, and every year thereafter will be the year of the Lord. Having been formed in you, Christ is born, and the words of Isaiah become yours: “For to you a child is born and a son is given. The government shall then be upon your shoulders, and you will be the Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace. And of your reign there shall be no end.”

Start now to look upon the great mystery of creation as the subjective appropriation of your objective hope. Dwell upon my words. Put them into practice, and you will experience their fulfillment, for all things exist within you!" - follow me 1968

He says look at this all as "subjective appropriation of objective hope", and hope being Christ. He also said "you will be the the wonderful counselor. That's another term we need to define.

"I tell this story only to illustrate a principle. You do not need to ask anyone to aid you in the answer to a prayer, for the simple reason that God is omnipotent and omniscient. He is in you as your own wonderful AMness. Everyone on the outside is your servant, your slave, ready and able to do your will. All you need do is know what you want. Construct a scene which would imply the fulfillment of your desire. Enter the scene and remain there. If your imaginal counselor (your feeling of fulfillment) agrees with that which is used to illustrate your fulfilled desire, your fantasy will become a fact. If it does not, start all over again by creating a new scene and enter it. It costs you nothing to imagine consciously!" - brazen impudence 1968

Here he defines the counselor as the feeling, implication. That was simple.

"When you read the 9th chapter of Isaiah, you may wonder what it is all about, but may I tell you nothing could be truer. Listen carefully: “To us a child is born, to us a son is given; and the government shall be upon his shoulder, and his name shall be called `Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.’” These revelations do not come in the order the prophets recorded them (or some scribe changed); but the names are true and are revealed in perfect order." - I AM the cause 1969

That's another interesting one. He talks about us being the wonderful counselor, as well as God, Father, Price of Peace. So he says there's an order here in them. The scripture said that Christ will be born and be called those names in that order. So does this mean that it begins with the overlap of conscious and unconscious to move the feeling/implication of the structure of the pathway cascades as that imaginal inner body?

"Now, the third great revelation is that of Wonderful Counselor. And in scripture the Wonderful Counselor is associated with a serpent. Referred to as the wisest of all of God’s creations, it was the serpent who suggested eating of the tree of knowledge. And when told he would die, the serpent said; “No, you will not truly die. For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.” The Wonderful Counselor did not lie, for believing himself to be you, he experienced death but did not really die.

Even though we depart this world and seem to die, we don’t. Instead we are restored to life in a world just like this, to continue our journey for unnumbered centuries.

Now, in the same 3rd chapter of Genesis, the Lord said to the gods: “Behold the man has become like one of us, knowing good and evil,” just as the serpent said he would. Only by coming down into this world of experience can you eat of the tree of knowledge of good and evil and become as the gods. So we see the 3rd title, Wonderful Counselor, has much to do with the serpent. We are told that: “No one ascends into heaven but he who descended from heaven, the son of man; and as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, so must the son of man be lifted up.” When you read these words they do not make sense, but when you experience them, and you willm the third title of Wonderful Counselor is conferred upon you.

Your eyes will be opened then, and you will know good and evil from experience. You will know that you will not die, but will return to the heavenly state from which you, the son of man, descended. And you will ascend like a fiery serpent." - same lecture

So there's another example here. He likens the serpent to be the counselor. When Moses lifted up the spirit in the desert, that's a foundational level of theurgy work. So once again be aware that the counselor is the implication, the feeling of fulfilment, satisfaction.

"If I were told in the beginning of time, I must confess, I had forgotten it, for it is simply the return of memory. So, the Spirit of Truth is called the Comforter. He is called the Counselor. And then you are told, when he comes to you, “he will bring to your remembrance all that I have said unto you” (John 14:25). So, he is a Remembrancer! So, man remembers." - the dweller on the threshold 1971

That right there is VERY important. Recollection. Remembrancer. Recollection is remembrance. The spirit of truth is called the comforter, the counselor, and this is as we said before, fulfilment of the wish. The recollection of self, the expansion of self by disregarding the conditions of the world and owing natural striving. That desire is there for feeding expansion and faith and as NG says since all desire and seed and states are all holding the implication in the pathway cascades as they intelligently move current into unfolding what that accepted desire means about you, then it's expansion into being more of yourself that's going on here with this stuff. Alchemically this works, and has been the basis that RS stands on since the start.

"“Unless I go away, the Comforter” . . he is called in one translation, and the Counselor in another, but he equates it with the Spirit of Truth, “I will send you the Counselor who is the Spirit of Truth.”" - same lecture

The spirit of truth. The acceptance of innate truth. Right? Lines up well.

"Again these same four, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John is revealed to us in a strange way when the child is given a name. Isaiah 9:6. “For to us a child is born, to us a son is given; and the government will be upon his shoulder, and his name will be called Wonderful Counselor.” Two entirely different experiences; . . a child is born, a son is given. Don’t put a comma between Wonderful and Counselor as so many Bibles have. Bear in mind there were no punctuation marks in the ancient Hebrew, not even breaks or paragraphs, it is all continuous. There are four names given in keeping with the fourfold Gospel. “His name shall be called; Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.” There are four titles.

Wonderful Counselor, . . that is Omniscience itself. You can add nothing to a Being who is completely awake; they would not have the automatic answer. So, here is Omniscience. Mighty God, . . Divine Omnipotence. That is when the third title comes. Then, Prince of Peace, that is at the very end when you are about to take off the garment for the very last time, as told us in the book of John. “My peace I leave with you, not as the world giveth, give I unto you.” He gives us peace that is beyond understanding. You can’t disturb that peace for he is the “Prince of Peace.” He is an “Everlasting Father”, . . he is Father forever. “When you see me you see the Father.” “Almighty God.” . . A might beyond the wildest dreams of anything you have ever seen. And when you see that Might you see it personified as a man. You look into his eyes and you see might as you have never known it before . . and it is a man. Then “Wonderful Counselor”. He promises he will send the Counselor. When he withdraws he will send the servants who have the understanding to follow him as he reveals what happened to him." - the fourfold gospel 1963

So he's saying that the birth of the Christ child is one event, then the son being given (David I believe) then is another event. Then he says the comma in most bibles (I know what he's talking about) between wonderful and counselor isn't really needing to be there. I can see that. The four titles of God in order are "Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.". So interestingly here he also expands on them individually. Wonderful counselor is omniscience, consciousness, itself. Right so then in brackets above (assuming the lecture text I copied this from didn't add that in later) means the fulfilment of the wish, but NG is saying that awareness itself is the counselor. So the servants who see what happened are likely those who are complete with the work.

"All this wonderful symbolism unfolds within man. And when the child comes it’s a miraculous child. The government, the full responsibility, all the authority will be on his shoulders. He will close and none shall open. He will open and none shall close. That’s the responsibility that is placed upon his shoulders. His name is Wonderful Counselor, for [he] has infinite wisdom now. Mighty God, possessing divine wisdom and divine might. His third name is Everlasting Father, as he is the eternal Father of humanity and the essence of humanity summarized in the eternal youth called David. Then comes the final title, Prince of Peace. Not just the peace after the conflict of war, but a full and complete enjoyment of everything in this world, for he has found peace. Then you are told, “Of his greatness there shall be no end.” And where does all this take place? In the individual you!" - the miraculous child 1966

The third name here being the Everlasting Father is David, eternal youth. Immortality. Prince of peace, enjoyment of all things in the world. These are qualities of the immortal are they not? Unconditioned awareness as the counselor, David as the Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace enjoying life as self. This is what we become as a capacity.

"In the very last chapter, the twenty-second chapter of Revelations we read “I AM the root and the offspring of David.” The creator entered his own creation, then emerged from it; therefore he is now the offspring. But by creating it, is he not its Father? And by entering it, not pretending, but actually becoming it he accepted all the limitations of the human flesh. Now playing all the parts, he cannot come out until the very end of the drama. And when the play is over he, as you, emerge. Then the essence of the whole vast creative world stands before you as a son, and David calls you “Father”." - same lecture

So the WHOLE vast collective world (all the braincells of God I'd take it) stands before you as a son, which is David who calls you Father. You must intuitively know that David is father, and David is all of your experiences, and according to how he called David the whole vast world, it must also be all the people who partake in those experiences then right?

"We are the Word spoken by God; but remember: God Himself is the Word. The author of this play is playing all the parts, for there was no one else to play them. God had to actually become the actor in this drama called life, and he cannot return empty, but must and will play every part completely and perfectly. Then the final revelation will be played, and God . . the Word . . will unfold." - the living word 1969

So here he's telling us again that God plays all the parts. So if humanity, all the parts of the play are God personified as David, then that means that the son is all of the capacities of God within all the played roles I say. Superconscious level, to some degree or another, and arguably even beyond that.

I just quoted the same part again. So Christ is the offspring of David, and David seems to personify all experience, humanity in the whole, the father of Christ and also the Father himself. This would seem to indicate then that David would have to be all the parts of creation which look at you and call you then the Father as you've completed the work.

"Now, the word “Judah” means, “to praise with extended arms.” It was Judah who embraced and kissed me, he severed my sleeve revealing the arm of the Lord, thus fulfilling scripture. “And who has believed our report? To whom has the arm of the Lord been revealed?” The arm is the symbol of the creative power of God. That is what was revealed in its beautiful imagery. Here was a handsome man, about forty, gloriously dressed, fulfilling everything scripture said he would do when he comes. Believe my words, for they are true. Let everything you formerly believed in go . . but do not let the word of truth go." - A parabolic revelation 1969

Interesting. He saw Judah, the man.

"The first five books of the Bible are called the Torah, or the Law, with Abraham as the symbol of the beginning of civilization. But the outstanding character recorded there is the infinite, eternal state called Moses. The word Moses is the old perfected [form] of the Egyptian verb “to be born”; so it is in the state of Moses that something is to be born. Now, at the end of the Torah we are told: “Moses, the servant of the Lord died and the Lord buried him, but no man knows the place of his burial to this day.” (Deuteronomy 34) Why? Because Moses is buried in you." - A state called Moses 1968

So Abraham is the beginning of civilization (man) and Moses means "to be born".

"For those who are not familiar with this symbol, the pig is the symbol of Christ, the power and wisdom of God. Every time you exercise your imagination lovingly on behalf of another or yourself, you are feeding Jesus Christ. My friend is stuffing his pig, because every moment of time he is alert and putting this law into practice." - all things exist 1968

So Christ is symbolized as a pig. Interesting. "My friend is stuffing his pig". That sounds so whacked, but it seems that "stuffing" Christ is putting the law into movement. Feeding. Feeding Christ. That's a very interesting quote actually. I thought it was we who feed off Christ, not the other way around, though God could be feeding Christ, since in capacity that power is what's opening up the Christ seed anyway so.

"This marvelous series of dreams revealed much. This lady admitted crossing the water while walking on a solid foundation. Now the Bible is a parable from beginning to end, and water is the symbol of its psychological truth. The literal interpretation of a parable is solid as a rock. When the meaning behind the parable is discovered, the stone is rolled away and the water found. However if a little solid reality in this world is desired while playing with this psychological truth, it becomes stepping-stones below the water. Loving what is heard is not enough. One must be willing to go all out and walk on the water. Instead, feeling she must be practical as she was living in a world of reality where rent must be paid, food bought, and clothes purchased, she is unable to walk by faith at the present time." - same lecture

Alright here we have water again, being "psychological truth". I actually don't even know if he's talking about eternal state as water, or the unconscious mind here as this explanation. He pretty much never talks about the unconscious mind really, as far as I know.

"Jacob is called in the New Testament, Jesus Christ." - Esau and Jacob 1959

So Jacob in NT IS literally Christ, the same. So wait. That makes Jacob in the OT the same capacity as Christ. Interesting revelation. Does that make Jacob the "Christ seed" in OT terms? Is this why Jacob has the 12 houses? The 12 aspects, gates to heaven, substances? I don't know, but I don't think that's a coincidence.

"So I have given you my technique in praying. I do not assume the responsibility for making anything so after I have identified myself with the state that I desire, I let it be so. It may take a day or a week or a month, and sometimes I never hear about it, but I know it must come true, for my word cannot return unto me void. I see what I want to see, and then I let it be true. I do not lift a finger to make it true, for how can I discuss it when it is already so. Whenever you have imagined yourself as you want to be and you have felt the thrill of it, that is Jacob’s command and the outer being has to move through all these states to fulfill it." - same lecture

So I just want to add on here. States, the arrangement of the implied pathway cascade that manifests through us via the meridian systems the psychological effect of that arrangement, this then unfolds through us the thoughts that will represent the desire fulfilled. They don't have to be first person present tense experiences or thoughts or anything more than a flash of an image in the mind to then be dropped. Really, you could even say it was the arrangement that was active that produced the thought of such, and not that the thought itself had that power. I don't know how I'd be able to really prove that looking back with my personal experience and the data I've been through but I can see some relation there in some cases. NG did talk about a quote where thoughts that relate to the state will follow if you're in the state. Too bad I can't find the quote or the source but I know I have it noted in the notebook somewhere.

The Christ seed is planted in humanity he says. In humanity. David. Bring to fulfilment everything that's contained within it. Humanity "has done its job completely" David fathered you in the world of time. So wait. David representing he who expands us while in this world, and also represents all of humanity by David (God as the root) playing all the roles of everyone in the world, is that driving force? Is David superconscious then? It would make sense, that's what I've thought from the beginning anyway.

"It was God who buried himself in humanity, and at the end God comes out of humanity. Coming out, he is humanity’s son; but when David appears, he is God’s son, revealing his father. When that Christ-seed blossoms and fruits in you, individually, you will share the fruit of your labor by telling everyone who will listen to you of the mystery of Christ." - same lecture

Yeah so buried in humanity is each person playing roles in the stage of the world by God. David must be that intelligence, the personification of that state. NG literally said David is who expands us, that aspect or facet of the intelligence of God being all of humanity and all of our experiences. It's kind of trippy to think about this stuff because you're viewing it from multiple angles at once but it makes sense really. He also talks about as God comes out of humanity, humanity IS God, David, the intelligence playing the roles, as I and other also, and that's humanity's son referring to God as the Christ seed here, but then when David appears Christ is fully expanded (as David in Christ) and thus David is the son now when before he was the father, since the conjugation altered the relationship of the sun to the heavens. Right? So we all have a personal Christ seed, the higher genius that would seem to represent at least in part, the pattern, and when conjugated through overlapping the eternal states then your relationship as the sun taken up into heaven then heaven/David becomes the son instead of the father, because that's what was said before. "David fathered you". This means that David must be the superconscious level or a facet of it which is heaven. No wonder nobody in the LOA space has properly decoded this stuff it's necessary to understand alchemy to grasp these things. Even I don't know EVERYTHING about the alchemical process but I know enough to get around.

So here's David as the father representing humanity again.

"David is not a little man born of a woman. He is spirit. Personified as an eternal youth, David is the result of your journey into the world of death. When the Christ child, in you, has put you through all the generations of men and you have experienced everything you agreed to in the beginning, you are perfect as your Father in heaven is perfect, and you have formed David, your son, to reveal you to yourself. The world thinks Jesus Christ is the son of God, but I tell you Jesus is the Lord. This is a mystery. David comes in the spirit and calls Jesus “Father.” Humanity is Christ, the son and Jesus is God the Father." - all that is divine 1969

Wow look at that. NG said that we "agreed" to experience this stuff. Fair enough, but as far as I know from our perspective as solar consciousness that's not really the case. Whatever. He said "Humanity IS Christ. Right it seems everything is Christ. Trying to determine which facets of this is next to impossible without cross referencing. More study..

"If it takes five hundred different beings, male and female, to respond to your imaginal act, they will come and seem to you to be the influence through which your desire is made visible. You see, humanity is David, always doing your will; and when your time is fulfilled, the whole of humanity is fused into a single youth and personified as David. Strangely enough, he comes from within you and reveals you as his Father. Then, speaking from experience, you will say: “I have found David. He has cried unto me, ‘Thou art my Father.’” and you will know your journey is at its end. It takes all the generations of men and their experiences to bring you to the point of confronting the beauty of those experiences, fused into a single youth known as David." - all that you behold 1969

So now humanity is David as we've heard, and he used the example above of hundreds of beings who partake in humanity being a part of that. "It takes all the generations of men and their experiences to bring you to the point of confronting the beauty of those experiences, fused into a single youth known as David.". That seems to be the answer. The beauty of those experiences, all the people playing all their roles, the total of all necessary experience personified as David, who birthed Christ with Mary.

"Your presence here tells me you have played them all, because no one comes unto me save my Father calls them, and I and my Father are one. Your consistent attendance and your interest in my words tell me you are at the end of the play. Having played the part of the well-known and the unknown, the wealthy and the poor, the disgraced and the proud, you have played everything, as it is all contained within you. Every conceivable part is now a reality in you, but you need not activate it. You can, however, enter a state and by the simple act of assumption, activate that state, and not one power in the world can stop its response. If it takes a dozen or thousands of men and women to respond to your assumption, they will, for humanity is David . . a man after your heart who will do all your will." - same lecture

Right so David is humanity, doing our will, meaning to move the characters in the world to play out the law? He clearly says here that an assumption manifest that moves people in the world will be the intelligence of David playing that role to do our will. Right. That's David's function. Superconscious mind, more or less it seems. David as a facet of God the Father, which you are in capacity.

"Everyone necessary to fulfill your assumption must and will come to bear witness to that which you are entertaining, internally. Now, although Nicodemus was a member of the Sanhedrin and knew Hebrew thought concerning history, he could not comprehend the idea of a second birth. It was he who asked: “How can a man who is old enter his mother’s womb a second time and be born again?” Then the answer came: “You, a master of Israel, yet you do not know; except you are born from above you cannot enter the kingdom of heaven called the new age.”

This is a drama of one being, expanding himself by first creating humanity, and then limiting himself to his creation. Humanity, although part of the structure of the universe, is dead. God, breathing upon it, possesses the body and Spirit, enters, and animates it. Now, in a body that is dead, God will go through the horrors of the journey, dreaming you and your experiences into being until he awakes where he began the dream . . in Golgotha, his tomb, which is your skull. And when God awakes, you awake. As you emerge from it, you will look back to see that which you occupied for six thousand years. You will see the linen clothes which your mother wove in her womb, and you will leave the napkin which the body expels.

Then those who come to bear witness to your birth will see only the discarded body and that which symbolizes your birth from above. Having had the experience, I can tell you: you started your drama in the skull and you will end it there. The drama is all about God, for he created it all. It is God who is playing all the parts of the drama and in the end it is God who extracts himself and rises from his own dead state. That is the resurrection. If you think in terms of one little being called Jesus Christ, you miss the truth completely; for Jesus Christ is your own wonderful human imagination who is God himself. When you imagine a state, God has imagined it; and just as a sound brings a response, your world will respond by playing the part it must play to bring about fulfillment.

All you are required to do is remain faithful to the state you entered. Now, Paul makes this statement: “Remember Jesus Christ descended from David according to my gospel.” Having experienced scripture, Paul calls it “my gospel.” He does not deny the descent of Christ, yet he knows that David was created by him. Having buried himself in David, God died by forgetting himself. Then David appears as memory returns, and he extracts himself from that body to discover he is far more luminous than he was before he entered it; far more translucent, greater in power and wisdom than he formerly was; for God is truth and truth is an ever expanding illumination." - same lecture

Lots here. So everyone in the play who bears witness "feeds" Christ, David, through humanity playing the parts that you play top down but also observe and "remember" yourself through. This seems to be why he constantly says that God is imagination, all the aspects of your psyche personified playing their functions out to reveal to you the metaphysical nature of your own being.

"As you emerge from it, you will look back to see that which you occupied for six thousand years. You will see the linen clothes which your mother wove in her womb, and you will leave the napkin which the body expels."

So this part of his quote is big. You look back and see all that's been occupies for 6k years. The linen is the form of the substantive aspects of water and earth.

"John being the most profound, he goes back to the grave and he tells it in symbolism, and all the signs are really . . all the signs that he uses in that wonderful picture of the grave are all . . well, signs. They are all figures, but the things that they signify are literal. So, he tells the story of the birth by using the sign of a napkin, which means the afterbirth, the placenta. He tells you what took place in that concrete state called the tomb: that when you found that little napkin, then a birth took place. Well, this was a different kind of a birth; this was the birth from God. God was born in this state. So he begins it with the very first act, for there are four “mighty acts,” and the first act is the Resurrection. A few moments later it’s followed by the “birth from above”, John ends it with that, but he begins it with the descent of the dove. So the whole thing is showing you, it’s going to be backwards now." - all powerful human words 1970

So here we have the napkin quotes above too. The napkin is the sign of the afterbirth, the placenta of the woman. The placenta of the higher birth that contained you, the Christ child in formation, so seeing the napkin symbolizes apparently the completion of that birth.

"In ancient times, the word “napkin” had a far wider range of meaning than it has today. We have a dinner napkin, a cocktail napkin, and also a sanitary napkin; but this napkin symbolizes the placenta, the afterbirth. The napkin appears, separate from the body, to tell you that a birth took place. This is the birth John insists is necessary for entrance into the kingdom of heaven." - all that you behold 1969

So here's more on the napkin.

More connection as we made before.

"Here is one told in the book of John. They say John did not tell of the birth. They say that only Matthew told it, and then Luke told it, so Matthew and Luke tell us of the birth of God, with the symbol of a child signifying that God was born. But, where is it in the other Gospels? Well, here it is in the end of John. They came to the tomb, and they found not the body of the Lord, for he was risen. The Lord was risen, but they found the linen clothes, and then they found the napkin, lying not with the linen clothes, but lying apart from the linen clothes. (John 20:3-7) When you read that and start to translate it into modern English, they don’t know what they are talking about.

The “linen clothes” symbolize the physical body, out of which he departed. You will see it when you come out. But, now, what is the napkin? The napkin in ancient times had very many more meanings than today. We speak of a dinner napkin, a cocktail napkin, a sanitary napkin, but in the ancient world, the napkin meant the placenta . . the afterbirth. If I see the symbol of the afterbirth, then a birth took place!

What took place? I see the evidence of a birth; I see the napkin. What was born here? God was born! Where was He born? Out of that thing that you call now “linen clothes.” That wrapped Him. Well, where was the napkin? Well, the napkin was not around the loins of a woman, the napkin was around his face; that’s where He was born. He came out of his skull; He came out of his head. He didn’t come out of the loins of a woman, out of the womb of a woman. So, here we find the napkin, the placenta, the afterbirth, signifying that something great was born here this day, and because it was a napkin, and the napkin covered his face, it was out of the skull that that birth took place." - family portrait unknown date

This is his explanation for the linen in the tomb. The napkin wasn't with the linen though, it was separate, as a sign as was said before. The linen obviously is the body. The linen clothes that wrap the Christ child in the scriptures represents the body then? The napkin he also says was around the face, since that's the skull where the birth took place. Right that makes more sense now.

"Let me turn now to the 20th chapter of 1st Kings. It’s a fantastic chapter. Read the entire thing when you go home tonight, I’ll only just cover it lightly. But a prophet, an unknown prophet, said to a fellow, “Strike me, at the command of God” and he didn’t. He said, “Because you did not obey the command of the Lord, as you depart from me you will be killed by a lion.” And so, as he departed he was killed by a lion. Then he said to another fellow, “Strike me, at the command of the Lord,” and he struck him and wounded him. Then he disguised himself with a napkin over his eyes and waited for the coming of the king of Israel. Then he said to the king as he came by, “I went into the midst of the battle; and a soldier turned and brought me a man and said to me, ‘Keep him; if by any means he disappears, your life shall be for his life, or else you will give a talent of silver.’ And as your servant was busy here and there, he was gone.” And the king said to him, “So shall your judgment be; you yourself have decided it.”" - the larger venture 1964

Interesting here. The napkin around his face. It's another sign of prophecy.

"The term, “God’s mystery of Christ” is used to express both the human race and the individual who attained the ideal David represents. The human race certainly is not ideal. It is scattered and always at war, but when the race is finished, its experiences are brought together into one single, beautiful being. While humanity is scattered its beauty cannot be seen, but at the journey’s end all of its horror is brought together and personified as a glorious youth called David, the son of God, who is God himself." - an assured understanding 1969

Ah right so he says that when humanity is scattered the beauty cannot be seen, because David is considered very beautiful. He says that all the it's only separation (not overlapped and integrated) that the beauty cannot be seen, though when all the states come together, all the microcosmic substances that represent all people and such, when they overlap then they become beautiful and that's David who's birthing us it seems.

So here's more of the doctrine of seeing yourself in all others. This relates once again to David and is relating to faith as well. The separation is united, in beauty. This seems to be what he's talking about with humanity all coming together as David and David births you as humanity, as your father, who births you, but that you grow out of through seeing yourself in humanity as God. Right? The overlap of the eternal states opens up such perception. This is why NG says that the law becomes more easy to operate when you reach the end and see yourself in all. This would mean you've transformed all the expectations and conditions of the people in your own play. This isn't actually solipsistic when you look at it properly either, because it's not denying a fixed point of comparison that's unfolding all capacities on a fixed trajectory. It's not all just subjective mentalism. At the highest level, the consciousness who's at that state of Christ could move anyone, since they're all simulacrums of the same capacity, and the alchemist has told me that all higher genii also are moved by the Father above all as well. The higher genius isn't really completely in control of that level above them it seems either, which remember is above the higher genius since then the higher genius has completed its work and the Christ seed is completely unfolded. So it can work.

"Unless one is born into the spirit world, when he leaves this world of flesh and blood he is not spirit but solidly real, as we are here. He is not seen by mortal eye because a veil has been drawn. But after your spirit is born the veil is removed from your spiritual eyes, and you will realize humanity is doing what must be done in order for God’s image to be formed in them." - follow me 1968

Your spirit is born then the veil is removed and then you see all people doing their needed acts to form the Christ child in them into completion like you have. This means that others aren't just figments of your mind or in their own reality bubbles, but that you can see "through" them as yourself, not in the solipsistic term but in a simulacrum integration form with consciousness above all the limits those people still hold. So then, when you're in this new age, all those people will be as you, expanded fully, and thus can instantly create in the new shared collective reality which nobody will control anyone there like here because consciousness is varied. It seems then, the one who is at higher consciousness is the one who pulls the strings, given the acts of those others isn't conflicting with their transformation relative to your imagined desire for them either, but isn't that God playing the role anyway then?

"Learn to adore your humanity, your spirit of life! Worship God by worshipping your own wonderful Human Imagination! You want to love God? Love your own spirit, for he is Christ. Remove humanity from you and you will not exist, so learn to adore your humanity, for that is your spirit of life. You may not be able to draw a straight line, yet you can create a smile on the face of a friend, or erase the lines of worry or age. You can do all these things, not by turning to another, but by using your creative power, the only God! Blake makes this statement: “Thou art a Man, God is no more, thine own Humanity learn to adore.” Humanity is your spirit of life! Turn to the only God, who is your own wonderful Human Imagination! Learn to adore him. All things are possible to God, therefore, all things are possible to imagine! Knowing what you want, ask yourself if you believe that your imaginal acts are committed by God. I tell you, they are!" - follow the pattern 1968

So humanity in this one is "your spirit of life". Humanity is how our reality is played out. If all things are possible to God then all things are possible to you as those other people in extension from top down. Since only God acts, the currents driving your inner truth will drive thematic supply/demand of the pathway cascade arrangement which manifests the experience accordingly. He tells us to adore our humanity, since that is God, us, David the beautiful. Love your own spirit, which he said is humanity. Humanity is the part that manifests all things for us, David, God. The simulacrums that each have their own path also mediate your experiences, because they're part of your process, and in capacity are you as well. Since they are you, when you love them, then you love yourself. First separating their expectations from you is necessary to even get there, else you'll be living from the pathway cascades of lack and limitation and you will not be able to love anybody being driven by unconscious conditioning from the humanity that surrounds you. I think NG here is basically seeing your corporeal being and humanity as well as all part of the actors in the stage play, in the body of God (not the body of love) and thus the rearranging of the metaphysical structure of the pathway cascades in the field geometry would necessitate then a rearrangement of the humanity in the world including yourself who is also a part of that play.

"My friend seemed to be observing someone else . . but there is no one else! Humanity is a single being, in spite of its millions of forms and figures. There is seeming separation, as divined in our own being when we were dramatically sundered, thereby causing a seeming other to play the part we wrote for ourselves. My friend wrote the script and played the parts by entering into a fourfold vision. In so doing, he carried it into his own intensity.

We are all asunder, as every being is self, made visible. You have given yourself every individual in your world as an image, and you alone know what he represents." - fourfold vision 1968

So NG is saying that when you look at another you're looking at yourself as a simulacrum. There's that thing again, about someone coming into their own intensity. Intensity is this word that to me represents operating from a higher consciousness, more of yourself, more without the expectations binding how wide you can view reality.

"This gentleman is on the verge of complete wakening into an entirely different age. No one knows the day it will happen. He will not depart, however, one hour before his time, neither can he delay it one hour. Scripture tells us: “Who, by taking thought can add one hour to his span of time?”

You need not be anxious, because you cannot postpone or hasten your departure, in spite of heart transplants and life-extending diets. You will notice, however, that all the dietitians, doctors, and health addicts do not live one hour longer than those who are not!" - same lecture.

Isn't that the same scripture I talked about in the video? It's not exactly the same but it's very similar.

"A: Alright, a very good question. The new translation of that is “Who by being anxious can add one hour to his span of life?” (Luke 12:25 RSV). In other words, your entrance and your exit is predetermined. That’s what the Bible teaches; that you make your entrance on time and your exit on time, though the exit seems to be suicide, though the exit seems to be the result of an accident. “But no one takes away my life, I lay it down myself. I have the power to lay it down and the power to take it up again” (John 10:18). So no one takes it from me at any moment in time. So who by being anxious can add one hour to his span of life? Therefore, it’s there to tell every man don’t be anxious concerning your exit; that is already determined by the play." - the sower 1965

Sounds like the same quote right? Just a different bible version. In the one from fourfold vision he talks about this scripture as in the time of your "departure"/death is predetermined but from the perspective of the completion of the work I'd assume based on the "entirely different age" and not the rebirth thing again. In the sower, it's framed more as the perspective of general life. So is the one from the sower also about the completion of the great work being where the death is predetermined? He talks about doctors and such also all living to a certain age and no longer, but they're under the frame of not having done the work I'd assume, so using them as an example wouldn't it apply to general death conditions? Is it then both?

"As we are told in scripture today with the new translation, “Who by taking thought could add one hour to his span of time?” It used to be said that “…by taking thought could add one cubit to his stature?” That has now been changed from a measurement of space to a measurement of time. “Who by taking thought or by being anxious could add one hour to his span of life?” You can’t do it, so you need not be anxious because you aren’t going to postpone it. You aren’t in any way going to hasten it, in spite of what all our wise men tell us about transplants and doing this and extending life today, because we know more about the human body and more about diets. You read the obituary columns in the morning and all the dieticians die just as the others, and all the doctors go the same way, and they don’t live one hour more than those they’re treating." - Blake four types of vision 1968

So here's pretty clear proof of him talking about general life and death, since he's using doctors and dietitians as how their allotted time is predetermined as well. I still don't fully agree with this view, though I consider it. He's saying that basically everyone who lives and dies will experience that exactly as God plans, and you have no control of that at all.

"When the gods came down in the likeness of men, some found a female garment and some a male. Entering death’s door with those who enter, and lying down in the grave with visions of eternity, the gods are dreaming the dream of life until they awake and see Jesus and the linen clothes which were woven with the cooperation of a male and female. These were emanations of the soul which is neither male nor female. “As it was appointed for all men to die once and after that comes the judgment, so Christ was offered once for the sins of many and will appear a second time, not concerning sin, but to save those who are eagerly waiting for him.” (Hebrews 9) You may hear of someone’s death, but he has not died to himself, as it was appointed that all men would die only once. We died when we left our heavenly home to come down and assume the limitations of the flesh. At that moment we were united with Christ in a death like his, with the promise that we would be united with him in a resurrection like his. Your death is over. When you go through the gate called death, you don’t die, but instantly emanate a young, unaccountably new body. Most of those who go through the gate do not even know it. They simply take their young body for granted, just as they do everything here.

All day long a miracle goes on in your body. Unknown to your conscious reasoning mind, tonight’s dinner is being converted into blood, tissue, and bones. No man can make a drop of blood, grow a new heart, or make one hair on his head. The other day it was recorded that a doctor had stated that his patient could not live three weeks without a heart transplant. He operated on the man, gave him a new heart, and the man lived 18 days! No matter what the doctors do, no man will live one hour beyond his span of time as told us in the Sermon on the Mount. “Who by being anxious can add one hour to his span of life?” Yet man goes blindly on believing he can.

All he is doing is publicizing his surgeons and the medical world. You are not the body you wear, so when its heart, liver, or lungs wear out, you will simply step out of it and emanate a new one. Made in the image of God, you are God’s prodigal son who came out from the Father. You have cleaved to the body you wear so tightly, you have become one flesh with it, so that whenever it is hurt, you are hurt. That is the Adam and Eve of scripture, therefore, it is not a myth. Your emanation does come out of you, but not from a rib. You have no body distinct from your soul. Your called body is a portion of soul discerned by the five senses, the chief inlet of soul in this age. You are now a living soul, destined to become a life-giving spirit. Having fallen, you emanate a body, which is necessary to function in this world, and you automatically do it with not one part missing. I meet those who have left this time/space and do not even know they have died. If I told you right now that you are not only sound asleep but you are also dead, you would think me mad and the possessor of a demon. That’s what they said of the Risen Christ. “Why listen to him, he is mad and has a demon.” Taking up stones to stone him they said, “We stone you for blasphemy, for you being a man claim you are God.” Then he replied, “Is it not written in your law, ‘I say you are gods?’ If he calls you gods to whom the word of God came, then why do you say of him whom the Father consecrated and sent into the world that he blasphemes?” (John 10)" - awake O sleeper 1968

Right so here he's expanded further. We have NG breaking down mortality for us. When he talked about the heart transplant patient, he was pointing to an example of how people in this world are entirely out of control of their death. They have zero free will to control that, according to him referencing scripture. It's not just talking about the total exit of the play entirely but also all of the iterations. I'm still critical of his view on this whole rebirth thing where nobody experiences death and rebirth as a child like we do here. How then do children exist in this world? How does that make sense, are they all just first iterations then? Who knows I've never heard him explain it, though he has said that when children suffer "God suffers" as the explanation. Sounds pretty bleh if you ask me.

"When someone born into poverty persists in dreaming he possesses great wealth and his dream comes true, his wealth seems perfectly natural to those who do not know his dream. You are dreaming. If you try to make your dream come true while doubting its possibility, you are heading toward a nervous breakdown. But if you go all out in your wonderful claim, you will fulfill it, for all things are possible to the God you are, for you are the God of whom the Bible speaks." - same lecture

Well well well. He tells us that if we try to make the dream come true while doubting then we will have a mental breakdown. Welcome to modern LOA. He says that as though it's so easy. Don't we all doubt? Well doubt must be related to a level of consciousness that will hold doubt since expansion and experience isn't sufficient to be able to cast out doubt when it arises. "If you go all out". Go all the way. Right we know how that works. Implied involvement is really the best way to bring that about as has been extensively explained.

"Jesus never claimed he was greater than another. Those who heard him did not know they were God, and he was only trying to awaken them to the memory that they were the sons who came down. He said: “Go tell my brothers that I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God.”" - same lecture

Recollection.

"If this universal diffused individuality is in all, then the incarnation must be regarded in a different light. We were taught that the incarnation took place 2000 years ago by a unique individual, who was the incarnate God. But I tell you: humanity is the incarnation. The central figure . . personified as Jesus Christ . . is the perfect archetypal figure everyone must express. He is called the true witness, the first-born of the dead. Now incarnate in your body of flesh and blood, you are dead in the sense that you have forgotten that you are the creator of all things, and do not see yourself creating anything you observe. The morning paper tells of what she, he, and they, are doing, and you cannot relate their actions to anything you have done; yet there is only one cause, only one God, who is resident in you as your awareness, your own wonderful human imagination.

The parable tells us that God entered a boat and fell asleep. Humanity is that boat, the ark where God the Father creates as he slumbers. Even though you do not know the people you read about, if the reading disturbs you, you are the cause of that conflict. All imagination, I am dreaming, causing the misfortune and unhappiness of those whose lives I have touched with feeling. When you awaken and recall your dream, do you always know the people there? Do you know the children that were yours in the dream? The people who frightened you? You never saw them before, so how could they be other than that which you caused? You do not recognize them, yet you . . the dreamer . . caused them to do what they did. The same thing is true here. If the actions of a seeming other cause a motor response in you, even though you do not know him, your awareness is the cause of the storm. But when you awake, memory will return and there will be a wonderful calm." - freedom 1968

So humanity is the incarnation of God. Yeah, David representing all of those states that we went through. I guess if everybody experiences all the parts all through time in the collective experience of all then it would make sense on that level that David can be the father. Humanity is the boat, the ark, in the great flood. One of every kind goes into the ark. One of every thematic of reality.

There's that "motor response" term I've talked about quoted. So by God being embodied in all of humanity and only God acts then only God is experienced, as self, as your capacity.

"Because everyone is the whole God, everyone will personify the perfect archetypal specimen called Jesus Christ. Lost in confusion, not knowing that humanity is the incarnation, men think of this archetypal specimen as the incarnate God. Yet the one grand commandment is: “Hear O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is one.” The word Israel means: the man who rules . . not like a god, but as God, because he knows he is God. And the word translated “Lord” is I AM. Now let me translate it for you: Hear, O man who rules as God, the I AM, our I AM is one I AM. We are not a bunch of little I am’s. Our I am is the one I AM who is God the Father. If this is true, then God cannot be divided; and the whole of him is wherever you are, wherever I am. There is no he, she, or they, in I AM!" - same lecture

Well there's NG talking about archetypal nature. He's saying that when we're lost in the ark not knowing that humanity is your own incarnation as God then you'll basically be living as Esau locked in the lower mind of perception and effectively unable to operate the law as he claims.

"If you will completely accept this, you will set yourself free. You may not immediately see the effect of what you have done in your imagination; but it must come, because there is no other creator to stop it. All things are made through awareness, and without it is not anything made that is made. It is imagination who claims: “I kill and I make alive, I wound and I heal. I form the light and create darkness. I form the evil and I make the good, the weal and the woe, and there is no other.”" - same lecture

So the implication of this is, stability, and detachment. Right? The effect of accepting this is the shen isn't agitated.

"So, the man who sees David as his son has gone through the entire history that was put into the mind of him. He has played all the parts, and having played all the parts, he is now entirely entitled to be awakened as the Father-within-him as him. And the concentration of the whole history of humanity stands before him as David, and David is the personification of Humanity. So, you can say that Humanity is the son of God! But Humanity personified as David of Biblical fame. So, all are contained within the man who awakes." - his purpose 1971

So the whole of humanity IS you who has become aware of being all of humanity, since that's the entire incarnation of God, and David is the collection of all of those parts who you were "fathered by". He says that when you see David is means you've "gone through the entire history that was put into the mind of him" and playing all the parts you're not entirely awakened. That's obviously a matter of expanding the inner eternal states, though it seems that NG is implying here that the effect of that expansion also will necessitate that you go through thousands of years of life experience. Interestingly he does also say that you'll look just like this in other iterations, so that must mean that you don't change your appearance then? You're a man or a woman forever of this genetic makeup? How does that even work if a child who was born dies in a few years old or something of some genetic disease. Does that child then wake up at 20 and have an already established life going for them and such? It's just crazy to think I've never heard any supporting data for this in any other doctrine I've ever read.

"Now let us unriddle the riddle. David is called the beloved. He is the personification of all the generations of humanity, and their experiences. It is out of David that God begets himself, for the dream is nothing more than the reproduction of the Divine Imagination in the human imagination. There is not a thing in the world but God, who is reproducing himself in humanity. God (Divine Imagination) is wearing the masks of humanity in order to experience its horrors, so in that sense humanity is his son. And when the journey is over for the individualized God, his experiences fuse into a single youth, whom he recognizes as his son, David. Then out of David (humanity) comes which would be the grandson, who is one with the individual, now the grandfather. So the riddle is this: Who becomes his own grandson who becomes the grandfather? Divine imagination!" - revealed truth 1969

Here NG says that humanity is the son while the journey is being explored. Id humanity is the son then that would be for the level of consciousness they're at at that stage since that's not permanently the case as we read before. He says here when the Journey is over for the individualized God, then HIS experiences form into a single youth called David. So that means that humanity being the son transfers to being then the grandson since your position has been expanded enough to be birthed again. Who seeded it all from the start? God the Father, or as NG says "divine imagination".

"Think of humanity as the soul of man, the bride of the Lord whose maker is her husband. The Lord so fell in love with humanity (his bride) that he left all and has cleaved to his wife until they became one flesh. So humanity is Mary, destined to bring forth the Christ child. And the child and the Holy Spirit are one, and the child and his grandfather are one. When you bring forth the son, God has finished his work in you and his cleavage on you is complete. Then you aren’t two anymore, but one. This is Divine Imagining reproducing itself upon humanity, which in the end comes out as God, the Everlasting Father." - same lecture

Oh so here we have Mary also as humanity. Right. Mary and David are both humanity. Humanity is the bride, Israel, and they became one flesh. Mary brings forward the Christ child, and the Christ child and the Holy Spirit are one as well as the grandfather. The work is done when David (humanity) calls you father, meaning you're revealed as the grandfather of all since David is the son and humanity within David is also now the grandson. Crazy lineage stuff here. Even all my study of seedline doesn't help a lot here really from this metaphysics perspective but I can see how it works. It's just trippy.

"I know this is difficult for you to grasp, but I feel we have reached the point in time for you to hear it. Out of Jesse (I AM) God the Father’s eternal name, will come a stem (David) humanity, and out of David will come a branch (Christ). Now, the question is: “What do you think of the Christ? How can the scribes say he is the son of David, when David, in the Spirit, calls him Lord?” I tell you: David is humanity . . that upon which Imagination molds himself and brings himself out of, then raises the individual out of which he came, back to himself along with the knowledge that the grandfather and the grandson are one glorious imagination. Humanity however will remain, for that is what Imagination molds himself on, throughout eternity. And when Imagination, individualized, has had all of the experiences of man, they will be gathered together and fused into one single whole, and appear as the eternal youth, David. You must go through all of the experiences of humanity before God’s son David will come forth to reveal you as his Father. It is he to whom the sign was given, for the child comes out of David; therefore the child is the grandson of God the Father and one with his grandfather, whom David reveals you to be.

I tell you: you are God Himself. The eternal Divine Imagination is reproducing itself in human imagination so that your I AM is one with the universal I AM. There can’t be any other. All the horrors you have known or may still know will add up to the birth of that wonder child. “To us a child is born.” It is to us, the human personality, that the child is born whose name is Everlasting Father. Then we experience His glorious son, David who made it possible. So Divine Imagination became humanity (human imagination) in order to beget himself. It takes all of the horrors of human history to produce that son who is the grandson of and one with the Eternal Father. The son, however, remains humanity, who condenses itself into a single youth called David." - same lecture

Human imagination (solar) comes from divine imagination. NG said the only difference between them is intensity. So then is intensity energy? I can't even remember if we defined it clearly using his own words.

I'm also not having time for a video up today. Damn it's another L I got so fixated on this work @_@

Well that's an interesting definition. Intensity is determined by the strength of the vortex you create. An intense movement of mind is what he's talking about, intense feeling of the subtle senses. So does that mean that more current means you're operating more as divine imagination? Human imagination is contracted divine imagination. Therefore intensity is the "openness" of imagination that's divine in capacity and that will be experienced as a more intense movement of the subtle mind. I see this as deeper overlap of water and fire, for example, which you "feel" as implication moving currents in the pathway cascades and operating in the subconscious level itself. I see the divine imagination more or less, at least part of it, as the subconscious eyes directly.

"Humanity is the “cross” that God wears; and on this cross, . . and it’s a painful load to bear, . . He forms His Son within you. And He doesn’t need anyone else, only the experiences of humanity. And every conceivable thing that man could ever experience, you . . prior to the actual forming in the very end . . you must have played. When you bring Him forward, there isn’t one part that you have not played." - the son revealed 1969

Humanity is the cross. He says that "every conceivable thing that man could ever experience" is necessary to have been played. There isn't one part not played. So once again, if we're born into the same flesh and don't even know we died, then how does that even work?

"You are told: “Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.” (Matthew 5:8) Well, how do I think I’m “pure in heart”? By diets? By going to church? By doing all the things that people tell me to do? No.

Man is purified by the death of his delusions.

As he dies to all of his delusions, he begins to awake, and it comes suddenly upon him, one delusion: that the white man is better than other colors, or the black man is better than other colors, or the yellow man is better, or the Christian is better, or the Jew is better, or the social worker because of his progress is better. All these are delusions.

But God in you is the Father. He will lead you through unnumbered experiences and take you into an experience that you could never consciously devise and shatter your delusions.

When the black man is looked down upon, one day he will save your earthly life. A black man would forfeit himself to save you from an ultimate, inevitable destruction. Or it could be the reverse: if he looks down upon the white, the white will give his life to save the black. And in that moment, that individual is saved by the death of that delusion." - the truth in Christ 1970

Man is purified by the death of his delusions. Only when we die to our delusions do we awake he says. The delusion according to NG is status and authority relative to others in humanity, instead of seeing humanity as yourself in extension. The delusion is separation, basically. This is what NG teaches here as the means of expansion. I still don't entirely agree but I can see how it would lead to that.

"Everything that man has imagined, is now imagining, or will imagine, will be expressed, and humanity will express it. The individual comes out, but He is playing all the parts, and He can say, “Forgive them. They know not what they do.” But each will come out, having played all the parts, and then he will be confronted with one being, a youth named David, and David will call him “Father”; and then the drama is over and he knows who he is. He is God the Father." - same lecture

"So I have found in David, the son of Jesse, a man after my own heart, who will do all my will.” (Acts 13:22) So, Humanity has done the will of God, because God is man’s own wonderful human imagination. Every imaginal act that man has ever set in motion, man performed . . good, bad or indifferent, for he did the will of God. God allowed man to make mistakes, but then the man had to pay the price. He allowed man to imagine anything in the world, and man paid the price! Therefore, everyone has done the will of God. “For I have found in David, the son of Jesse, a man after my own heart, who will do all my will.” (Acts 13:22)" - where are you staying unknown date

That's not a bad perspective on free will actually. God's will is for all the experiences to be had, to ripen for expansion. That's what we have no free will to avoid, as I've said, the pressure we cannot avoid.

"The modern translation of the word “root” is “scion,” which means a graft. I am the graft, and yet I am the offspring of that graft! I am the scion and the offspring of David . . David being Humanity. Engrafted onto Humanity is the Son of God, and He brings forth all that was in God. So if God is a Father, He brings that forth; and because He is one with the Father, He brings forth the Son. The Son calls him “Father.” Now we know who the Son of man is!" - who is the son of man unknown date

Grated on. My study in seedline tells me that the gentiles, which are of like kind, get grated into the fold to be saved through the sacrifice of Christ on the cross. So if the cross is the body and humanity, then the grafting into the fold is that because they're of simulacrum formation they're in on the promise of eternal life and that's the good news. Those who were already part of that structure were inheriting that eternal life anyway by default. That's seedline doctrine. Can make come parallels.

"Paul personifies scripture by saying: “The scriptures foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles, preached the gospel beforehand to Abraham.” The scriptures must be personified in order to preach. So three thousand years before the coming of Christ, Abraham was given a preview of God’s plan of salvation in the form of the gospel. Therefore, Abraham rejoiced that he was to see my day; he saw it and was glad.

When I say “I” (or “my”) I mean “we,” for we are the gods who collectively form God. In the great play, God is fragmented and the one becomes the many. But before the state of Abraham we, in perfect unity, wrote the play for a divine purpose. We agreed to enter the world of death and completely forget who we are in order to make the play real. This we have done and we will return enhanced by the play, but we cannot stop half way or turn back, we must finish the race. Everyone will fight the good fight. Everyone will go to the end and keep the faith we began in the state called Abraham.

The tree I saw was a perfect symbol of the tree of life. In Blake’s “Songs of Experience,” he said: “The gods of the earth and sea sought through nature to find that tree. But their search was all in vain, there grows one in the human brain.” That’s where the tree of life is. Having been felled, its roots are inverted in the brain with its branches as man’s nervous and circulatory systems. Man is the inverted tree, like the one you would see reflected in the still waters of a lake. Turned down into generation, that tree symbolized as man, will be turned up from generation to regeneration. On that day man is resurrected and returns, bringing back the fruit (the experiences) of this great play of decay and death." - before Abraham was I AM 1968

"Q: Neville, would you comment on the mystical meaning of Jews and Gentiles.

A: Jews and Gentiles. The Gentile in scripture—you take the New Testament, the part of it was simply the heathen, the pagan who had multiple gods. The Jew beginning with Abraham had the one God. It was always against any duality of gods; God and God only. “I am the Lord your God, the Holy one of Israel, your Savior… and besides me there is no God” (Is. 43:3,11). That they went astray, yes, and had Baal and multiple gods; but, basically, the Hebraic God is the one God.

Now, the pagan world into which this thing broke had multiple gods. They worshiped the stars, they worshiped everything–a god of health, a god of wealth, a god of power, a god of death, a god of life, and they prayed to their multiple gods. Today in our Christian world although we give lip service to one God, we have multiple saints, and we pray to this saint for this, and that saint for the other.

I am told that in Italy, or any great Catholic world, they’ll pray to this one and if they don’t get answer within a week, slap him in the face, go to another god. That was told me if they don’t get answer within a week, slap him in the face, go to another god. That was told me by an impresario in San Francisco two years ago. He said, “I actually saw it happen. I’m born a Catholic, I’m still a Catholic, I’m raised a Catholic, I’m a Catholic.” He said, “I’ve seen it.

They’ll go and pray before this one for awhile and if he doesn’t come through with what he’s asking for, they’ll spit on him, throw him out, ‘He’s no good!’ and go to another god.” Well, they still give lip service to one God, and call it by a name, they’ll call it Jesus Christ, but they don’t know who Jesus Christ is.

Jesus Christ is your own wonderful human Imagination, that creative know who Jesus Christ is. Jesus Christ is your own wonderful human Imagination, that creative power that is in man, and it’s one with the Divine Imagination. You don’t need any saints in this world, don’t need anything in this world to whom you pray, none. No intermediary between yourself and self that is God. God and his creative power are one.

So the gentile was the pagan of multiple gods. So he sends Paul to the gentiles, for Paul was equipped as the orthodox Jew and when he saw the real revelation, he was sent to the gentiles.

Peter went to the Jews. And then you get the story. But all these are simple…alright, I go to everyone. I don’t care whether you’re Catholic or a Christian Scientist or a Jew or anything else in this world, Mohammedan, I don’t care. I know what I’m telling you is true; it’s based upon experience. The whole thing is unveiled before me; I’ve experienced it. And so, I wasn’t always (??) because it’s true, this is everlastingly true. There’s only one God, one being playing all the parts.

There will be no conflict between gods when the drama is over but a rejoicing because the play came out just as predetermined. God planned everything as it has come out and as it will be consummated.

Q: (inaudible) if everything is supposed to be planned and we are the actors and come in with a script, then the whole thing is a fatalistic type of thing…just sit back and …

A: On a certain level it seems that way. You cannot avoid the conclusion of predestination when you read the letters of Paul. In the 8th chapter of the Book of Romans, when he tells us: “Those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son. And those whom he predestined he also called; and those whom he called he also justified; and those whom he justified he also glorified” (verse 29). These five terms…I don’t see how anyone can take the five terms of foreknowledge, predestination, to be called, to be justified, and to be glorified and arrive at any other conclusion than predestination.

Yet within the framework of a predestined play, the actors are given much freedom; because whether you are rich or poor does not alter the play, whether you are known or unknown. But if you want to be known more than to know of the creative power of God, then you are denying him in this world and falling in love with death; for this is death, when you want more and more of this state as the world seems to want it.

Tonight they are praying for Churchill’s recovery. What Churchill’s recovery? Let the old gentleman go. Ninety years old and he’s lived such a full and wonderful life, they’re asking people on TV and radio, “Let us pray for his recovery” That’s the most stupid thing in the world! Let the old gentleman who has played such a full and wonderful life close his eyes as they close tonight.

He’s not in a coma. Well, let him be free after ninety years of this. But no, the average person thinks well that’s oblivion, so let him have another one year of miseries. The old boy has been miserable for the last two years, being helped around. I mean, I would be embarrassed if all my normal, natural functions had to be assisted. Let me go when no one has to help me with any natural function." - the cabala 1965

So here at the second question he says that we're all predetermined when it comes to the unfolding of the promise, including the faith we have since that determines the timing, though within that we can choose to play other roles. Gentiles are those who worship pagans, of like kind. Someone who's like you, a God in capacity, who believes in the world above God.

"Now, the word translated nations in the passage that I quoted—“two nations are in your womb”—the word nations is goyim in Hebrew. A gentile is a “goyim, a foreigner, a stranger.” But in essence it means your backbone that is split in two. If you have a good concordance, a Biblical concordance, look it up, the word goyim. In fact, the word nations…and here it is split right down, every little segment of the entire thirty-two bones, from the top to the bottom, is split; at the base, this molten gold. And then think in terms of a sculptor making a beautiful image. He works from within. When he completes what he wants, then he covers it in clay, and then he pours his molten metal within and it takes the form of the mold. When it takes the form and coagulates, then he takes off the outer part and discards it. The outer part is this [body]. The day will come, I will discard it like an Esau, discard it like an Ishmael; send it off. As we are told in the very last book of he Old Testament, “Esau I hated; Jacob I loved” (Mal. 1:2,3). And these are the words of the Lord. You wouldn’t think that the God of love would hate, but he discards the outer part. It has no place whatsoever in the eternal kingdom. So, the outer man may have a bulbous nose, a horrible form…hasn’t a thing to do with the work that is going on in the inside. That inside is all that matters, and when it’s fi nished in the eyes of God, he pours himself into it. He is the molten gold…that’s the blood of Christ…and 70 Neville you see it at the base of the spine when you are severed in two from top to bottom." - works by faith not miracles 1965

Well there it is. Goyim. Bad goy.

18/12/25

Well here's an interesting data point. People who are forced to build skills from scratch and feel the pressure of the inability to perform to a level that a machine would, for example in drawing art, that person actually has significantly higher density in regions of the brain that relate to that skill vs someone who simply recalls things they saw that someone else or an AI made. The person who has the skill feels more nourished and more reward. Having skills and using them results in higher satisfaction in life. Building real problem solving skills improves your life, and the only way to build that skill is to struggle to find answers but to persist.

Doesn't this sound like the process of transformation under pressure? We need to solve a problem we are facing, we feel that we cannot make it happen but we involve to the degree we can and go all the way. Eventually at a certain threshold a breakthrough happens and skill is attained. When someone or something else thinks for you, where you don't feel pressure, then you cannot expand. You literally are unable to transform without the pressure.

My GF is legit putting in effort to please me more and more these days it's interesting. It's only getting better consistently that time I thought before that might've reverted hasn't changed back it's just more available now than ever. I find that when you boost vitality they respond better too. They can feel it.

"Assume your wish through the sense of feeling. That assumption, subjectively appropriated and believed to be true, is faith. Can you believe in its reality? Knowing all things are possible to him who believes, can you persuade yourself that, although your reason and senses deny it, your assumption will make it so? Blake, in his wonderful “Marriage of Heaven and Hell,” said: “I dined with Isaiah and Ezekiel and asked: Does a strong persuasion that a thing is so, make it so? and Isaiah replied: All prophets believe it does, and in ages of imagination a firm persuasion moved mountains, but many today are not capable of a firm persuasion of anything.” Everything here was once only a desire, believed. This building, the clothes you wear or the car you drive were first a desire, then believed into being." - all things are possible 1969

NG defines faith.

"The being you really are is the God in scripture who is your own wonderful human imagination. Can you leave this auditorium tonight in the deep conviction that you are what you want to be? Are you willing to assume its joys and woes? Your assumption is your subjective appropriation of an objective fact. That is faith and without faith it is impossible to please him." - same lecture

Another instance.

"So, this is what I mean by faith. “Faith is the assurance of things hoped for.” You hope for it? Well, now, the assurance is faith. Faith is not going to make it so. Faith is loyalty to the unseen reality. You know what you did? Well, now, that’s unseen by mortal eye. Now, you remain loyal to that unseen reality, and see how this bridge of incidents is woven, and you do not consciously devise it. No man can consciously devise the incidents necessary to lead you to the fulfillment of what you’ve done. Well, this is what I mean by faith. The very substance of what the world calls real is unseen. It’s unseen reality." - faith 1968

There's no way you can say that faith is anything other than stability of belief and all of this is thematically associated charge sensations depending on what pathway cascades are firing.

"So, Paul, to me, is the first in whom the vision took place. It came to one of the smallest tribes, Benjamin, a child of Abraham. Abraham is faith. It was all shown to Abraham and he believed it, and waited patiently for the fulfillment of what was shown him. He saw the play, too. It was all portrayed to Abraham. “And Abraham rejoiced that he was to see my day.” Then he went into the foreign land, as he was led by the spirit, but he still remained faithful to what he had seen in the play. The play unfolded before him and God played the part and God was Christ Jesus." - Paul's autobiography 1963

Abraham is faith.

"After smothering yourself in feeling, you have sent it on its way and cannot take it back, for prayer is nothing more than the subjective appropriation of an objective hope. Imagine by giving objective reality to your hope. Hair is the most objective thing on a man. Bring your hope so close that you can feel what it would be like if it were objective to you.

Clothe yourself in that feeling . . and you have clothed yourself in the reality of an Esau. The world will not immediately reflect your feeling, but you have set your desire in motion and cannot take it back. You have given a subjective state your blessing by giving it objective reality. Now it must fulfill its destiny so that you will be blessed in all that you are doing.

If you don’t give your subjective hope objective reality, you can’t be blessed in its fulfillment. You must clothe yourself in the feeling that your wish is fulfilled. Jacob is your desire, waiting to be clothed in the feeling of external reality. Catch the feeling, and you have clothed Jacob with the external reality of Esau. Now deceive yourself into believing that your desire is externally real, and give it your blessing by subjectively appropriating your objective hope. Who is the blind Isaac? You are, for you cannot see what you are asking for in your outer world. It’s a hope and you are blind to it. But when you clothe yourself in the feeling of its fulfillment, you are eating the feeling of satisfaction. Feast upon this feeling morning, noon, and night, and in a way you do not know your desire will become an objective reality in your world.

In this story we see the importance of feeling. Isaac asked Jacob to come close and kiss him. The word translated “kiss” means, “to set on fire; to burn; to touch.” That’s an emotion, an intense feeling. Reality is felt through the sense of touch. Feeling is touch. Tasting is touch. Scripture tells us he tasted death for all of us. How do you taste death? By experiencing it. Jesus tasted death by dying in all, that all may know who he is.

Now I urge you to put his teaching into practice. He taught you to simply appropriate a subjective state which is your objective hope, and know it must externalize itself in your world. Do that and it will. Ask in faith, without a doubt, for those who doubt are like the wave of the sea that is driven and tossed by the wind. They are double-minded, for they know what they are while desiring to be something else. You must be single-minded by dropping what you believe you are and assuming that you are already what you desire to be, for you cannot desire something you already possess. Look into the wonderful law of liberty which sets you free, and you will see your freedom in the faces of your friends. Persist in your assumption and it must come to pass." - feel deeply 1969

Kiss is to set on fire. Interesting interpretation. Jacob is the desire. Desires contain all the elements to unfold fully when accepted, or entered into. If Jacob is the Christ of the OT then that would mean that accepting your desire and entering into it is ripening the birth of the Christ child? He tells us that we cannot speed it up, though I know he's mentioned it to be sped up before in some other lecture in a Q&A section. I just need to find it.

"So here, we can take any idea…and maybe take a noble idea…but, how can I plant a thought? First of all, a thought unless it moves man into action is not creative. A thought by itself does nothing, doesn’t affect anything. So how do I take a thought and sow it that I can really make it become effective and it moves through this series from a thought, to an act, to a habit, to a character, to a destiny? Well, the Bible teaches it, and you listen to it carefully, this is from the 4th chapter of the Book of Hebrews: “Good news came to us just as it came to them; but the message they heard did not benefit them, because it did not meet with faith in the hearers” (verse 2). It did not meet with faith in the hearers. For are we not told in the same book, the 11th chapter, that “By faith we understand that the world was created by the by the word of God” —by faith—“so that what is seen was made out of things which do not appear” (verse 3). For the word created it, but without being mixed with faith it would be impossible to create anything. It had to be mixed with faith. So if I take an idea this night, say this noble concept as far as I can conceive it, I must mix it with faith. Can I persuade myself that it is so? Well, I have discovered from my own personal experience that I do it when I feel it. I must in some way persuade myself through feeling, so I captured this phrase, “Assume the feeling of the wish fulfilled.” I always start in the end; the end is where I start from. So I take an idea but the idea that I see it in my mind’s eye fulfilled. I occupy the end, the fulfilled state; there I then view the world and see that world mentally as I would see it were it true." - the supreme ideal 1964

Well there goes the robotic affirmation crowd.

"So I start in the end; the end is where I start from. In my end is my beginning. And then it takes me through…it becomes almost a habit of thinking. The next day it seems easier, and the next day it almost becomes my character; and finally, I find myself fulfilling it in a way I could not have devised. I didn’t know how it happened. I couldn’t have worked it out. I could not have placed myself in some state where I could just simply devise the means by which it came to pass. It seemed on reflection that it would have happened anyway. But it wouldn’t have happened anyway. It just simply happened that way. So I know exactly what I want, occupy the end, viewing the world from the end, and seeing it in bloom as it were, seeing it fulfilled. Then it becomes a habit, and finally, that’s my destiny. So on this level, anyone can be free, anyone." - same lecture

Hey look at that. That's what I remember before talking about this whole "the next say" thing. He tells us right here that starting with the end (feeling the wish fulfilled) makes it so that "the next day it seems easier". It becomes a habit of thinking. Right. There's another quote here I want to explore.

"Well, what did he do? He simply used his imagination to give her what she wanted. She wanted a man, not a jerk; so he simply got a man. And, now, as far as she is concerned, he is just the best man in this world. Well, I closed on this very last Friday in June; so I do not know if it is consummated or not . . I don’t know. But they are dating every, every day; and as far as she is concerned he is the only man in the world. But who did it? My friend, his name is Ray Lee. He sat down . . he likes her as a friend, and all the men in the office . . they like her. She has worked in the office for a while. It’s an advertising office. And Ray, knowing this principle, he figures, “All right, we’ll forget all of the people in this world that she thinks are no good, and I will now see that she has a perfect man.” And that’s all that Ray did. On his way home, he did it; next morning when he was shaving, he did it; and he was reminded by her gloom that something must be done more than what he did, so he did it again. So, he did it maybe four or five times in that interval; and in less than two weeks, she finds an angel on earth. Of course, he may not always be that; but, nevertheless, at the moment, he is all that he (Ray Lee) wanted her to find." - prophetic sketches 1968

Boom right there. Here he's explaining how persistence is applied practically. There's another example of this I've read. This is his words remember. So he said basically that this guy did it over and over and over. "It" being the entering into the end and feeling it. This means that persistence is repeated regular experience of it until it shows up. NG said that this guy entered the scene about 4-5 times over 2 weeks.

Alright so getting back to foundational practice. Without surrounding conditions being clear then you'll always be agitated and need to seek comfort in some way, likely through pseudo satisfaction. This is the issue. So people who tend to make the NG stuff work for them already have a comfortable ENOUGH foundation to stand on in surrounding ways. Without that then you will be agitated and seeking for something to discharge the pressure you're unable to mediate. This is and always will be foundational. NG seemed to elude to this in some of the terms he discussed but seemed to never really talk about things like that in any way that's clear. So RS stands above the rest in that regard, and all this satisfaction stuff should come off the back of an already comfortable foundation. The way you make that happen the fastest is by stabilizing the shen. Periodic and dynamic gazing is good for this. Best thing to make all the NG stuff apply for you is simply to involve in whatever provides meaningful experience that's satisfying towards who you're wanting to be, since that in itself is proof of being the person you want to be. With this satisfaction in state streak, you will be exponentially more likely to make "magic" happen with coincidences and such lining up like you'd expect. It happens, but almost always it comes off the back of willing expansion. The movement of pressure, into meaningful satisfaction, NOT pseudo satisfaction, that will provide the condition (arrangement) by which the thoughts thematically related to what you intend to manifest to come through you. We're creating the "set up" by which that vision can work through us far more naturally and in stability without need and such.

No matter what NG did or didn't say, this is always how it will work for everybody and explains pretty much every example of success. I swear, the success stories that show up come off the back of meaningful involvement in life in surrounding ways that support the stability of the state of being the person who has the thing. Always remember, states contain within them the means to unfold the vision, but that's stemming from correctly aligned psychological profiling of how you're expressing yourself. So that's why I call states "degrees of function as self/self love" because they are since that's where the power comes from. Operating according to the inner guidance mechanism opens this all up. Trying to interpret NG into fitting every part of his doctrine into RS is a challenge, but I will argue much of his SATS mechanics have been very closely aligned with the RS methods and how the mechanics of pathway work applies. When you do imaginal experiences properly they can have impact, because they will rearrange the structure of your pathway cascades if you experience meaningful movement of the currents internally. Involvement for some things isn't always the magic trick, since for me it wasn't what got me over the line, though as I said above, without that state streak implied involvement of making more nourishing decisions before getting into the inner work then the inner work wouldn't have made a single bit of difference to me and would've wasted my time. Inner work should almost always come off the back of meaningful involvement. This is what I've observed after years of pattern recognition with successes and failures.

Thoughts that hold power, including fleeting thoughts, come off the back of meaningful involvement in state streak. This is something that's clearly observed in almost all cases, and this can be as simple as "giving up" as in letting go of conditions that you've been stuck with for years. This explains pretty much every example of seeming magic happening. It's that something moved before the thought happened that related to it which drove that vision to unfold the way it did. This also explains why it can't be replicated on the spot, because it's almost that "set up" is needed to get it working reliably in most cases. Going all the way ties into this phenomena too. There's a threshold crossed where the pathway cascades overlap and interact that's shifted and the NG stuff where he talks about structure (the sensory details in imaginal technique) having no power but what the meaning/implication is that's overlaid on that represents holds the power. What this means is that a disproportionate region of the field geo is being illuminated in that place and the implication represents importance where refinement can be made. From here, "feeling" the wish fulfilled as satisfaction means disregarding the importance of that condition over the top of the vision being accepted, and this moment of "motor response" as NG says is what holds the power. Then you wait, not because waiting is bad but because you've established an arrangement of the field geometry which leads you to respond differently to when the same sensory stimulus thematically fires those pathways that previously triggered you. If you "fee;" (charge phenomena) that you already have it then you'll be stable and not agitated, therefore it's all a function of moving disproportion from the field geometry to establish a foundation of stability and comfort and this is what is observed.

So with all that in mind we know how this works with 100% certainty. If you want to manifest a lottery win, for example, then obviously you need to have the vision for such a win. With that pressure within that's agitating you (which is what desire is to force attention to transform the arrangement of the field geometry) driving transformation then you'll thematically end up "reacting" to things that illuminate the lack of what winning the lottery implies about you and your life in various ways. Those ways that you find related also should be fulfilled since those are surrounding conditions. Those surrounding conditions when nourished and are no longer a source of agitation will support the structure in the pathway cascades that brings about the result of winning lottery, be it through one ticket you end up buying or thousands. Doesn't matter, since you'll end up somehow with a winning ticket if your vision is to be that way and all meaningful conditions surrounding that are eradicated from your attention. The whole point more or less is to establish comfort at baseline, without agitation causing motor responses of lack.

Listen carefully. When NG talks about how your reactions to life cause seedtime, it's actually I will say that those pathways which really already exist are just confirming to you their arrangement. The agitation is already there as a condition, else you'd not react that way. There's a disproportionality somewhere that's bringing to your attention an agitation, heat, stimulation of the shen that's forcing attention to the region of the pathway cascades that needs rearranging. How do you rearrange it? You recognize what it means/implies and experience that factor no longer being a source of agitation. You negate the need for whatever is important about that to bind you into the response you had. How do you do that? Well I've explained that endlessly over the last few pages. You get real with how you feel. NG by telling you to enter a state, to activate seedtime by experiencing what you want, is ASSUMING that you're clear enough to not have a visceral response of lack. Guess what, most people who hold conditions on what they want DO NOT experience it the way he described. They will be agitated when going into the scene, and unless that scene actually implies/targets the exact pathway cascade that needs rearranging, then nothing will change in how you respond, since your agitation is a result of the proportionality of the pathway cascades. Simple fact. That's determining how you feel in all ways. This means that as I said before, the state when entered, is actually you experiencing implication. That's all that entering a state is, and entering a state is feeling the field geometry pathway cascades, however they're arranged. This is why I find it genius when he said the power is in the implication, not the sensory detail because sensory detail means different things to different people, and this proves that NG WAS talking about a letting go experience by this. That's the ONLY reason he'd say that, and why you need a scene to elicit the feeling of current moving. That's what he said has the power, and the above mechanics I just outlined is a world first to explore that.

This is what my video tomorrow will be on. To reveal these mechanics and how to operate it, in just enough detail of course.

Making any movement of mind work is by operating this mechanism. I am honestly still critical of the NG bible doctrine in various ways, since it seems to lack some critical details as well as how he explains what belief really represents and means, but whatever. I will argue that belief is a condition of the established field geometry. Our conscious experience moment to moment is always a result of what's unconsciously anchored. ALWAYS. You can ONLY change the structure of that foundation your conscious mind swims in through experiencing implication of parts of that structure no longer holding the same meaning and importance. "Motor response" in the words of NG also proves this is in fact a charge phenomena, about the "feeling".

"Now, in order to really understand scripture, you must have some knowledge of the experiences recorded there, because they are not of this world. The Bible speaks of the New Man who is in you. It is that Man of Spirit that I am appealing to, as he can believe in the reality of an imaginal act. The outer you knows a reality which it can touch, see, and hear. Its belief is based upon the evidence of its five senses and reason." - biblical language 1969

Belief here is explored as evidence of the senses. I can agree, in state streak that is. What the "experience" of belief is in this case, on an inner level, is about your relationship to what the sensory details mean and imply about you. So as said before, implication is implied charge phenomena. Conditions are importance's on things that aren't innate. It's that you've taken a projection from someone else and placed meaning on it that's important to you when it never was. That's why my method of disowning conditions to be so powerful. Everyone in LOA who talks about living in the end and the state of the wish fulfilled as though it's something you consciously do all the time is just stupid because anyone who does that in almost all cases will be in serious pseudo satisfaction and lack. Listen carefully to this. If you're someone who's got a foundation that's comfortable, say you've got enough cash to live with and it's nourishing, but you really want to be the owner of a sports car that's $3 million or something crazy. Well you'd think you have to make the money to get it but that might not be the case. What is necessary is that you're comfortable in the surrounding thematically associated areas of life, because someone who doesn't see the financial barrier as an important condition will manifest it without personally having to make the money for it. How do I know this? Well it's just functional mechanics, but that doesn't mean the person doesn't have to involve in any other way to build the real belief in having it. What I will say is that in all cases that someone manifests a free car or whatever that's worth a large sum, it will be because they're repeatedly involved in the auto world in some way, that they tour with the manufacturer when shows are on for example, or they'd have contacts who they know who have a similar car, or they are in a business relationship with a dealership who makes it. There's SOMETHING that will be available for them to involve with that they will also WANT to involve in, not to get it, not out of "need" but because it's a related association which holds an implication of "closeness" to having the car. The more you involve and experience being around and "in" the car, to the degree that you can "go all the way" with that's satisfying and actually nourishing to the drive to expand, that will be all that's necessary. From that point, those mechanics will work to manifest either a free car that you want, one that's loaned from a contact to you, or however it happens. There will be SOME WAY of manifesting it. THIS I strongly believe is how the thing where NG says to not worry about the how is meaning. It's not about don't involve at all and dream about it. If you actually dream about it then it will only lead you to wanting to involve, and that will be a natural progression of the mechanics of attaining it, how the desire holds within it the means to attain it, because the currents that move through the pathway cascades will bring about that end through you naturally.

However it manifests it will be through these mechanics. I 100% guarantee because this explains why people who dream all day and don't act get nowhere, but also the ones who take radical actions but cannot accept that these sensations of need are the issue as well, which NG did mention as a condition where he said "don't lift a finger" and it was talking to those types with conditions that meant something about them that was lacking. Understand it's about dropping conditions against it to establish comfort in clarity where agitation isn't driving action and involvement but a willingness to involve through affinity with the vision. You become more one with the vision that you had in the mind because of that involvement, which is why it's such a critical factor in the application of RS. People ask me endlessly about how to manifest free money, lottery wins, SP, whatever it is. I can 100% guarantee that those people could get those things, if they'd apply what I said above. That's not conditions on making it happen, it's actually the other way around. They must become comfortable in all surrounding ways, to enough of a degree that they're comfortable. I've manifested SP's literally walking outside my house without even trying, but that's because I worked this mechanism unconsciously. The reaction reveals the inner state, the field geometry arrangement, and thus your relationship to the world around you in thematic supply/demand implication. When there's literally no way for your involvement to extend outside of certain boxes because you're physically disabled, then going to any other degree will open that up to manifest for you. It's the degree of stability and coherency between the various associations that hold importance against having or being the person who hast the thing. This is why involvement matters so much, because it is how you establish that foundation in almost all cases via state streak which moves the importance of the trash by revealing to yourself with "evidence" that you no longer hold those conditions as important. It's the same thing as inner imaginal work.

This would also indicate that inner imaginal depth isn't necessary to manifest at all. Any means that elicits a motor response in you that implies nourishment is available at baseline will be all that's needed.

"Belief is the condition necessary to realize the desire. No amount of pleas or ritual will bring about the fulfillment of your desires other than the belief that you are or have that which you want." - imagination creates reality unknown date

So here, NG tells us that there is a condition to make it happen. Well if most people who manifest their things don't consciously "believe" in that thing happening, it must then mean something else other than a conscious story we tell ourselves relating to it. The story CAN relate to it, but it doesn't have to, from experience. It can be a fleeting thought once and that's it. The point here though really is that the pathway cascades and the implication that the vision means about you is what determines belief on a current and charge level. That's where belief comes from, so if belief comes from evidence of the senses, but that NG said the evidence of the senses doesn't have any meaning other than what that's implying about us, then the charge that's felt through the fixed point of comparison being illuminated relative to what's experienced, that then provides the meaning to it since that's accepting more of innate self thematically that will overlap what these sensory details represent about availability.

All of these mechanics work through the inner guidance system which is how you feel about different things, the activation of the meridian systems and the pathway cascades.

All of that works in fact, IF the scene moves current where it needs to go. I believe the secret to self abandonment is recognizing what implications to touch on by what you inwardly experience. That is inner alchemy, and on the deepest level, that's done for you by the greater intelligences you run up against in theurgy. When you're forced down to your knees and beg for space before divine powers who can tear the very fabric of your psyche to pieces. Advanced gazing makes you interact with them too, but in a sort of "touching your fingertips" on them kind of way. That's why when I do advanced gazing for upwards of an hour and a half every day lately I sometimes get the visceral reactions and my body literally is forced to move in crazy ways. It's always done that and I'm not in control of it when it happens, but it's moving current and that's all that matters. Whatever it's doing it's moving necessary stagnations in my meridians to open up clarity in response.

What NG taught as dying to ones self, or "self abandonment" should in theory explain deconditioning. I shall study that here now. That should be a last part to explore. I do know that he said "self abandonment is the secret" in one quote I read years ago and I made a short on it.

"We aren’t pretending. We completely abandon ourselves to these garments. The secret is self-abandonment. Never would you have made anything had you not loved it, . . never! We so loved it; and so, having loved it, we commit ourselves to the object of our love and actually become it. Self-commission is the secret." - self abandonment 1970

"For crucifixion comes before resurrection. Crucifixion without resurrection would be unthinkable; it would be the utter triumph of tyranny. If I could yield myself to my dream and it would not become flesh, it would be complete tyranny over this wonderful concept of life. But you cannot fail if you yield. If you hold back within yourself, wondering “What will I play as my last card if this doesn’t work?” then you have not yielded, you have not nailed yourself to it. It is a complete yielding. It is the great cry “My God! My God! Why hast Thou forsaken me?” If you know that you’re God doing it, you can yield. But there must be complete abandonment as though it were true and then you make it a reality. The cost is that form of mental abandonment that Blake calls “madness.” But man is afraid; he dare not so abandon himself to a dream, and so never “dies.” So Blake was right when he said: “There is nothing like death: the best thing in life is death.”" - the art of dying 1959

Ah so in this lecture he frames self abandonment under the perspective of "yielding". That's a term I've not studied extensively but I know he's used it a lot. Time to add it to the list. Also near the end there he calls the abandoning of himself (his current dysfunctional field geometry arrangement) to the dream death, the same way he talks about the seed needs to "die" as well. Think about that. Whoa did I just unlock a whole new depth of mechanics in his doctrine I never saw before? There's more and more. Self abandonment seems to have coded in it with this whole "death" thing (the microcosmic level Christ death on the cross representing this transformation) as a function of dropping the conditions that aren't yours to hold. That is base process crucifixion. This is what RS teaches about throwing the trash back where it belongs. So if death in scripture terms is the same thing then we've connected a new level here, because states, seeds, desires, all "die". That's interesting, because it truly does then represent the pathway cascades that rearrange and that proves it. Man as if this couldn't get any deeper. I just keep going deeper and no matter how much time I spend there's more. Death in this sense is leaving behind the importance of the conditions.

So far these are all the terms I've done deep study on that are what I'd consider "important".

Terms studied:

Abandonment -
Absorption -
Action -
Activate -
Appearance -
Believe -
Boomerang -
Christ -
Christ seed -
Condition -
Contemplate -
Death -
Desire -
Detach - https://realitysynthesis.com/pages/neville-goddard-quotes-detach
Die -
Doubt-
Dwell -
Emotion -
End -
Faith -
Feminine - https://realitysynthesis.com/pages/neville-goddard-quotes-feminine
Ferment -
Figurative -
Heaven -
High mood -
How to -
Ideal -
Identity -
Impression -
in the course of a day -
Individual -
Lessons -
Let go -
Meditation -
Motor -
Nervous -
Observe -
Oil -
Pattern -
Persist/ence - https://realitysynthesis.com/pages/neville-goddard-quotes-persist
Potency -
Power -
Pushed out -
Reincarnation - 26 - https://realitysynthesis.com/pages/neville-goddard-quotes-reincarnation
Remain faithful -
Restored - 208 - 0.03 - https://realitysynthesis.com/pages/neville-goddard-quotes-restored
Righteous -
Satisfied -
Scene -
Secret -
Seed - https://realitysynthesis.com/pages/neville-goddard-quotes-seed
Separate -
Sensation -
Shadowy -
Spiritual -
State - 2382 - 0.34 -
Structure -
Subconscious -
Suggestion -
Sustain -
Technique -
Trinity -
Unbelief -
Wind -
Yield -

Only a few of them I've got a source page with all the quotes listed. There's just so many and it takes hours to put them all in.

"I know the truth of that statement for although Blake was born in 1757 and died in 1827, we are closely woven in the tapestry of thought. One particular night we met, and after discussing the mystery of God, Blake said to me: “Fall backwards with a complete abandonment of self. Do not restrain yourself, just relax and fall.” Following his instructions I felt as though I was falling off the earth, as I hurled through space like some interstellar body. And when the motion ceased I looked up to see a single man aglow in the distance. His heart was like a flaming ruby, but when I approached I realized that all of the people in eternity were in that one body. I saw the body we will all be gathered back into when God’s play is over." - the ultimate sense 1969

Here's that quote about "falling backwards" that I've read many times. There really is a sense of "charge" that happens with this you feel. I know what he means. I've had a few clients also speak of this "explosion" they felt for the scene I instructed them to try and they got an SP to show up soon after. It does work, but it's very difficult to reliably do, because you do have to "let go". That's what I did that night when I felt the fury at full blast and died to needing to conform. That was my death.

Let's go deeper into this whole death of the seed thing. The seed is the state, as we've decoded and these quotes also prove that. Entering into a state is letting the seed die, meaning for it to unfold and become the tree instead of staying as a seed. This is death of the old state that's disproportionate and lacking faith, the belief, AKA the field geometry arrangement. It's coming together so well I almost can't believe it.

"This is the great mystery of the seed. Unless it falls into the ground and dies it remains alone, but if it dies it brings forth much. The pattern, like a seed, is planted in the earth, called Adam. The seed will take root and unfold according to its pattern." - a state called Moses 1968

So there's one example. I'll just list them all here rapid fire, unless there's something important to comment on.

"This is how the poem begins: “Awake! Awake O sleeper in the land of shadows, wake! Expand! I AM in you and you in me, mutual in love divine.” The being in whom we were contained deliberately fell into this state called death, for the purpose of expansion into glorious life. His story is told in the parable of the grain of wheat, which unless it falls into the earth and dies, it remains alone. But if it dies, it brings forth much. Here is the story of the mystery of life through death. Being all Imagination, if I want an extension of reality, I must contract and die. I must empty myself of the glory I had with the Lord, and enter the one body, which falls. The world tells us the fall was a mistake but that is not so, for God planned everything as it has come out and as it will be consummated. One day you will awaken, your mask will come off, and you will be enhanced beyond your wildest dreams as you awaken to eternal life. And when we all awaken, we will know each other more intimately than is possible to know one another here. My wife and I often think the same thoughts; but no matter how intimate we may be, we cannot know the intimacy that will be ours when these garments are taken off and we are once more awakened into eternal life. Everyone will awaken in time, but not by any effort on their part while here. Your awakening was predetermined and it will happen on time, regardless of whether you are shining shoes or employing a million people. Our government undoubtedly has a million people on its payroll, with the president as its head. So in a technical sense he employs a million; yet tonight the one who shines his shoes could awaken, while the president continues to sleep, yet no one can die. That is the glorious part! Your body is your emanation. Cut off its head and . . believing you are it . . you will instantly renew the same body, but with no missing parts. You will step out of the garment you now wear and men will call you dead; but you will have just stepped into another garment with no bridgework, no fillings in your teeth, no gray hair, no need to wear glasses or a hearing aid, to discover you are a young man (or woman) about twenty years of age. You will be in a terrestrial world just as real as this one, and continue your journey until you awaken." - awake O sleeper 1968

"Now he said, “Double the vision is always with me…twofold always.” Now what is twofold vision? I stand before a fireplace. I have stood before a fireplace unnumbered times, enjoyed it, its warmth, its beauty, but it still is simply wood burning. One day, as I look at it and the flames leap up and suddenly something is happening, it subsides then falls into embers, then into ash, and to all appearances it is gone. I say to myself, “My life is like a fire.” At that moment I achieved a simile. But I m stirred, I don’t stop there. Then I say, “Life is fire. My life is fire” and here I have achieved now a metaphor. I’m still fired…and I drop the “is” and I say life and fire have now become synonyms. I will never again think or see one and not feel the other, or feel one and not imagine the other. And I have achieved now a symbol, some forever image. So fire forever now is simply an image. Before, it was simply fire, now it’s an image…it reminds me of life. That is twofold vision when everything becomes an image. As Goethe said, “All things transient are but images.”" - Blake four types of vision 1968

"Now the word we translate “God” in Hebrew, Yod He Vau He, He Vau He, the verb in its ancient meaning—-yes, we translate it as “to be,” any form of the verb “to be,” “I am”; we translate it that way, “to exist, the self-existent”—but its primitive meaning was “to fall or to cause to fall; either that which fell or that which caused the fall.” Now listen to these words: “I came out from my Father and I have come into the world; again, I am leaving the world and I am going to the Father” (John 16:28). Think of a creative act. My creative power is part of me now. If I could endow it with speech, after the creative act it would say, “I came out from my Father and I have come into the world; again, I am leaving the world and I am returning to my Father.” I left my Father and therefore in departure I died. The mystery of life through death: “Unless a seed falls into the ground and dies, it remains alone; if it falls into the ground and dies, it brings forth much” (John 12:24)." - Creation 1965

"Q: Well, are there different levels of repentance?

A: I would say, based upon our understanding of the world there may be more difficult states to be overcome, one who has, say, lost an arm. To say, “Well, how can I repent in the sense of putting back an arm?” That would be more difficult and an impossible state compared to something that could happen, like a cancer disappearing without any further surgical remedies. But, in spite of that, I have had the experience where arms that were missing, eyes missing, all kinds of members of the body missing, and I walked by and everything came out of hiding as it were, as though they were in some hidden reservoir, and molded themselves beautifully into the empty sockets, eyes, arms, legs, all things, as I walked by. I saw it and experienced it so vividly. So I know the power of the new age, where man rises into a new world completely subject to his imaginative power. In fact, I didn’t do anything. I was one with perfection, and walking by, being perfect, not a thing in my world could remain imperfect, it couldn’t. I didn’t have compassion on anyone; I simply walked by demonstrating the power of perfection. So I know that world into which man goes when these things happen in him. But while he’s in this world, we’re all made subject unto this futility, certainly not by our own will, we are part of the structure. Then God in his infinite mercy redeems us through his Son. But through his Son he has to impregnate us with his Son. He is that male power that actually The Wonder Working Power of Imagination 145 impregnates the womb, the soul of man, and therefore the Son detaches himself from the Father, and therefore dies. It falls into the ground and dies, the womb; but it now is made alive and brings forth much, and redeems that womb into which it buried itself. This is the story." - same lecture

"Q: After all this happens, do you still meet tests to overcome?

A: After it happens? You’re still wearing a garment of fl esh and these garments of fl esh are related to the animal world. This is part of the world of the beast. I can’t stop it…I must eat, I must do all the things that the animal world is doing, it’s part of the animal world. When it’s taken off after these experiences, you’ve taken off the animal for the last time, and you are Lord, one with your creator. The Creator, the Revealer, and the Redeemer are one and they are God.

Q: Do some people die in this lifetime and never have any of these experiences?

A: Oh, the majority. The majority, ninety-nine point ninety-nine, and they’re all restored to life only to die again. And all these are being prepared. While God is preparing them, he is selecting the womb for his impregnation. His son, that power that is called “the little child” in the 8th chapter of the Book of Proverbs, “I am the first of his acts of old”—- the first creative act—-“and I stood beside him as a little child” (verse 30). “He who finds me finds life; he who misses me injures himself; he who hates me loves death” (verse 36). So the answer to your question, those who say there is no God and who hate the very thought of such theology, they want to control this world, and find some scientist or scientists who can perpetuate the little garment, go on forever in this and control of the world. Well, that’s a false dream, an idle dream, because they don’t believe in this that is something entirely different which is an act of mercy. Were it not for this creative act of God, we would simply be animated forms of a dead world.

Q: Then there is something that we must do to help bring this about?

A: The one teaching in the Bible concerning it is repentance, that’s all that I can find. He said, “The time is fulfilled and the kingdom of God is at hand; repent, and believe the gospel” (Mark 1:15). Believe the story. Here it has happened: One brought it into reality, the first fruits of those who slept, the first and true witness from the grave. Well, now one has returned. The seed that was planted in the womb of one has matured and brought back the story of redemption, the story of resurrection. Now he said, “Believe” after he tells us “Repent.” So the first command then was to repent, and to repent is to change your mind radically; and to go out and teach the world how to change their minds in spite of the facts of life, in spite of the seeming realities. While reason dictates? Alright, it may dictate it and I may find it diffi cult to change my mind when reason is forcing me to accept the evidence of my senses and the wisdom of men. You take…there is a chap in this audience tonight who went through a painful operation and painful experiences in the removal of skin cancers. And when the doctor said, “I can give you no more radium; you’ve had as much as I can give you”—and it’s not only an expensive operation, but it’s a painful thing—then he turned to this principle of repentance. He simply in his mind’s eye carried on an inner conversation with himself that it was gone. And he carried on with friends as though the friends said to him, “Well, where are they?” He said, “I don’t know… not even a trace that they were ever present on my face. And every morning…this man has a very heavy beard and he had to shave every day, and so shaving he couldn’t quite deny their presence. But inwardly he carried on conversions with friends as though they were not present. Then one vanished, the second vanished, and the third vanished, and they’re all gone. You can see it this night. I defy anyone to look at that man’s face with microscope and see where these skin cancers were ever present. So that’s repentance. He has practiced repentance, so he is prepared as a womb, loved by God because he obeyed God’s command to practice repentance. He’ll be impregnated if he hasn’t already been. I’m convinced he has been and he’s bearing the Christ child." - same lecture

I added this one in to reference that point that I made on NG saying that we can speed up the promise, among other experiences. So to me it seems that since repentance is a way to expand, which is to basically feel how you really feel and accept the vision fully, which is what he's talking about basically. Repentance is dying to the old self, so if dying to the old self accelerates the expansion, and inadvertently makes the law work, then we can see that the operation of the law, in effect of expansion, is how you unfold the promise. The law is just the mechanics of effects in the field geometry changing how you experience life, but that's not the main goal. NG did say that success according to the law is not success according to the promise.

"Use the law and it will take you from success to success, as you conceive success to be. As far as I am concerned, success is to fulfill the promise, and you CANNOT do that through the law. The promise is fulfilled through FAITH. Are you holding true to the faith? Examine yourself to see if you are. I have told you an eternal story. Believe it, but do not change it. The story is this: God became you that you may become God. Use the law to cushion the blows while God keeps his promise; and then one day, when your journey is over, you will say: “Into thy hands I commit my spirit. Thou hast redeemed me, O Lord, faithful God.” That’s the cry on the cross." - believe in it 1969

So right here we can hear him saying that Faith is the only way to fulfil the promise, and faith I'm guessing here is faith in terms of accepting innate self, which is God metaphysically as greater process, or as RS says the inner guidance system. I say that the RS take on this whole design matrix is 100x more practical than HD ever was since it works in all cases for everybody no matter what. There's no divisions of design variables needed to be understood. HD is in essence telling you to do what RS says anyway, but in an overly complex way that's just not practical. You don't need any of that to make this work. Yeah some parts have clear connection to our experience from HD, but it's just something that gets in the way the more seriously you take it. So NG clearly said that the law cannot be used to fulfil the promise, though by accepting innate self and repenting, you're operating the law anyway so. I believe here he's talking about operating the law from the not self perception and such, though in his other quotes we went over late last night he mentioned how we can assume anything here and we have freedom to do such. How do you reconcile this? Well the pressure comes from somewhere to want to repent, and NG has talked about our dissatisfaction as necessary to expand.

Remember that quote? Yeah right there Paul talks about dying daily and NG mentioned the "divine dissatisfaction" term. So this was under the direction of literal expansion of self, and crucifixion was a part of that, which we've been talking about thus far.

Back to the whole seed falling into the ground and dying thing. It's the end now I need a new page already. That was fast. https://realitysynthesis.com/pages/aetheraeon-notebook-31

Item added to your cart

Aetheraeon Notebook 30

Aetheraeon Notebook 30

Country/region