Aetheraeon Notebook 31

"Not that it has any purpose in this world other than that you desired it. Because the man of wealth and the poor man are the same being. The poor state, the wealthy state are only states. The man who occupies the poor state is an individual that never ceases to be that individual. But if he falls into the state of poverty, well then you call him a poor man. But he doesn’t differ from the man who falls into the state of wealth. For the man in the state of wealth; he’s not any better; he has money, lots of money if he’s a fabulously wealthy person. But that doesn’t put him in a spiritual sense beyond the man that is poor.

But the man that is poor doesn’t know he could get out of the state of poverty. All these are states, infinite states and man blindly falls into states. If he knows they’re only states and he dislikes the state he’s in, he’ll get out of that state by now planting one of these moments, these heavenly moments by assuming that I am now secure. Security is a relative term. It may be that someone feels, well, insecure with a hundred thousand a year income. I’ m quite sure that if you take any of the fabulously wealthy men of our world and say, “your income as of now will be only a hundred thousand a year,” they would instantly have to sell their yachts, their homes, all these things, and give up membership in certain clubs because they couldn’t even pay their servants. If they had a full complement of servants in their many homes, and you said a hundred thousand a year, well, they’ll feel poor." - every natural effect unknown date

Falling into the state. He also said that desire is just desire. Yet in another place he said that desire is also for expansion purposes. He did differentiate between real desire and trash desire that's not really innate.

"It was God’s purpose to give us himself, and God is a Father. The only way he could do it however was to detach us from himself. Yet, like the sucker, he who sent us has never left us; therefore we must express that which the parent plant is. If its flowers were red, that which was transplanted will bear red flowers. Now, regardless of how healthy the stock may be, when it is transplanted it appears to die, showing us the secret of life through death. The seed falls into the ground and dies in order to be made alive. So the seed, containing within itself all that the parent contained, dies and is made alive to become the parent, containing within itself that which was in the parent stock." - he is my resurrection 1968

So there's the seed falling into the ground and dying again. He said the seed contains within itself all that the parent contained. Here's another quote that supports this.

"In the 16th chapter of John we are told: “I came out from the Father and came into the world. Again I leave the world and I return to the Father.” In these four short phrases we find the pre-existence of Christ, his incarnation, his death, and his ascension. I could put this in the first person, plural sense and say: “We came out from the Father” for we are told in the 1st chapter of Ephesians: “He chose us in him before the foundation of the world.” So all of us were chosen in him. That is why I can say, “We came out from the Father and came into the world. Again we are leaving the world and are going to the Father.”

How can this be? Let me use a simple analogy. A plant contains within itself the suckers which can be removed and transplanted. While existing within the plant, the suckers partake of the plant’s life, but when removed and transplanted they become the parent.

It was God’s purpose to give us himself, and God is a Father. The only way he could do it however was to detach us from himself. Yet, like the sucker, he who sent us has never left us; therefore we must express that which the parent plant is. If its flowers were red, that which was transplanted will bear red flowers. Now, regardless of how healthy the stock may be, when it is transplanted it appears to die, showing us the secret of life through death. The seed falls into the ground and dies in order to be made alive. So the seed, containing within itself all that the parent contained, dies and is made alive to become the parent, containing within itself that which was in the parent stock.

And so it is with us. We came out from God the Father and were planted in a world of death, a world of mortality. Then, having died, we become quickened and grow into the parent stock, for if we were a father before detachment, we must return as the one Father who sent us out. And everything God the Father possesses, we possess in our fullness. His son reveals himself as our son. Whatever happened to him happens to us, for we came out from the Father and came into the world. Again, as we leave the world we go to the Father. That is the great mystery of scripture." - same lecture

So he then reveals the pattern of life. Seeds, states, desires, they all contain the blueprint of life.

"There never was a time that you and I were not partaking of this tree of life, but we were not individualized. We did not voluntarily detach ourselves and enter this world, but were made subject unto futility in the hope that we would be set free from this body of death and obtain the glorious liberty of the sons of God. Now, the Son of God is one with God, for the son erupts into the Father. Like the sucker which contains within itself everything that the parent tree contains, but cannot know it until detached and transplanted, we contain within ourselves everything the tree of life contains, but will not know it until we come out from the Father and come into the world. Having died, death will be transformed into sleep, from which we will all awaken as God the Father. Individually we will all have these four mighty acts erupt from within to spell out the being we really are.

In the statement: “I came out from the Father” the pre-existence of Christ in you, who is your hope of glory, is established. I am not speaking of some little man who walked the earth 2,000 years ago, but of the mystery of Christ which is buried in every child born of woman. Christ, God’s creative power and wisdom, pre-existed. His detachment and entrance into the world through his birth from below is his birth into death. Then, after the long interval of death he is born from above into a world of life. Having come out from the Father and coming into the world, his return to the Father is essential. He comes back bearing witness to the fullness within himself of all that the parent contained, thereby knowing he is the Father. This is how all the fathers return." - same lecture

So much there again looking into the fractal field geometry.

"You see, when you emptied yourself of your power and wisdom to take on the form of a slave in the world of time, it was at once a tragedy and yet a triumph. Just like a sucker, which breathes and feeds on its parent, knows tremendous tragedy when detached and planted separately . . but it becomes the parent because of the separation. So your separation is a tragedy and yet a victory, for you do become aware of being God the Father because of it." - power and wisdom 1968

So NG is talking about the states being separated just as suckers from a parent that becomes the new parent containing all the genetic code of the parent before.

"Now, the seed that I contain within myself bears my image. Find the appropriate soil in which to plant it, and it will grow into the likeness of myself from which it was taken. You take a succor from a plant; try to take it from the plant. It participates in the life of the plant, but you take it from the plant and transplant it; it becomes in its turn the parent. So the seed of God is planted in man, and that seed is called Jesus Christ. It bears the express image of His person. So the seed comes to the Womb, which is man. By “man,” I mean generic man. It comes in the form of a story, which is the story of the Gospel, which is the story of God. He desires to raise us to the level where we can appreciate Him, where we can venerate Him, where we can understand Him; but I can’t understand Him on my present level, as He ought to be understood. For, to go back to the poem (“Little Boy Lost” by William Blake):" - the man within 1968

"So, I say it is His purpose, His office, to actually turn men into sons of God by grace, through union with Him who is the Son of God by nature. Now, here is the perfect seed of God, called Jesus Christ. Buried in me, it sort of takes a graft; and like the little succor of the plant, although it lives upon the tree, until detached, and partakes of the life of the tree, when once detached and transplanted, it becomes in its turn the parent. So, he takes his seed and transplants it, engrafts it into man; and then that transplant in its good time becomes the parent, and the parent is God the Father; and, therefore, the same son that called Him “father,” must call me “father.” Then I will know that I AM He; and there is no other way of knowing it."- same lecture

So these are both talking about transplantation. The moving of a seed into its own ground to become another parent.

"I have done everything that Scripture foretold that man must do. “I have finished the work thou gavest me to do. Return unto me the glory that was mine, the glory that I had with thee before that the world was,” (John 17:4, 5) for I was one with God the Father, and He detached me . . as He detached you . . for purposes of His own; and He actually implanted us His Word in this stock called “Humanity,” that we may become as He is. For, while we are part of that wonderful Eternal Tree, we partook of the nature of the tree . . yes. Our substance was supplied by the trees; we had no life in ourselves. We were part of the Life of that tree. By detachment and incorporation in the stock called “Humanity” we, the grafted bud, now bear the fruit from the parent tree from which we were taken. And now we bring forth everything of that parent tree. Well, He was a Father; I have to bring forth fatherhood." - the promise fulfilled unknown date

Here's more on the parent tree thing. We were taken from the parent tree, the supply, and while containing all of the aspects of that parent tree, God, then we are also containing the elements to become God. That's what the capacity is and what the promise is.

"Q: Neville, would you restate this proposition about the birth—to beget, to bear.

A: I said that there are…you can concern a birth from two angles. One from the father in which the verb is “to beget” and John uses it in all the gospel of John and the epistles of John. In the 13th verse of the 1st chapter of John—-“born not of blood nor of the will of man nor the will of the flesh, but of God”—-that verb is “to beget.” In the 3rd chapter when he speaks with Nicodemus and “that you must be born from above” that is “to beget.” That is not as the present state would be. So that you can take it from the father’s side, which is always “to beget,” or from the mother’s side in which the verb is “to bear.” So here, Mary, that’s female, that’s feminine, so she bears. So ___(??), well, the child is there, it’s been declared yours, as others told you it’s your child, so you bore it. But when it comes to David, no one tells you anything…it’s begotten. The little infant, the Christ child is discovered by the wise men and they proclaim that you are the parent. They don’t call you father, they don’t call you mother, they call you by your name; and they will say “It’s John’s child.” Others will ask a question, “How can John have a baby?” Nevertheless, it’s something born." - the smile 1965

Bonus.

Now back to the seed dying in the ground AGAIN. Then we will get to quoting all that is on crucifixion.

"Tonight’s subject is: “His Purpose.” When purpose is revealed, everything falls into place, so the revelation of purpose gives meaning to the existence of life. There is a purpose behind it all. It may not seem so, judging from this level, but there is a purpose . . a great purpose. It is God’s purpose to give Himself to us, because in the end we will awake as God. That is the purpose." - his purpose 1971

Well there's the grafting off of the parent tree to become our own parent. Simple. That's the promise, immortality.

"Now we are told in the 1st chapter of John (11-13) . . he is speaking of an entirely different kind of birth: “And those who believe in his name will be born, not of blood, nor the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God.” Not born in any that this (the body) is born. “Flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God,” only Spirit. When you are born, you are self-begotten. You have actually no parents. You come right out of a grain, the mystery of the grain of wheat that falls into the ground. If it doesn’t fall into the ground it remains alone; if it falls into the ground, it bears much fruit. The mystery of life through death, for God actually died to become you, to become me." - is Christ your imagination 1963

There's the falling into the ground again, vs being alone. Didn't NG talk about a seed being alone before?

"I left my Father and therefore in departure I died. The mystery of life through death: “Unless a seed falls into the ground and dies, it remains alone; if it falls into the ground and dies, it brings forth much” (John 12:24)." - Creation 1965"

Yeah that's where it came from, so it's the same quote. UNLESS it falls into the ground and dies, it remains alone, meaning unborn I believe.

"You will say, “Well, what is going to happen to me?” That’s yourself… you’re saving yourself. So don’t be concerned what’s going to happen to me. May I tell you, things happen. It’s all yours. He said to the first son, “All mine is yours.” But the son didn’t know it. He wasn’t detached; he wasn’t separated from the Father. So he couldn’t appropriate… not even a little kid. He said, “He never once gave me a kid that I could have a feast with my friends.” But he said, “Son, all that is mine is yours.” The son didn’t know it. But here, “Your brother, he was dead”—for separation from God is death— “and he’s alive. He was lost and he’s found.” So the seed had to be detached from the Father, fall into the ground, to be made alive. “For a seed unless it falls into the ground, then it remains alone; but if it falls into the ground and dies, then it brings forth much” (John 12:24). So the seed, which is the creative power of God, your own wonderful human Imagination, falls into the ground in you. This [body] is the red earth, called Adam. And then, it is made alive. Suddenly he begins to awake and he realizes who he really is. He encounters infinite love. But without the power of Imagination and divided from Imagination, love itself is eternal death." - love divided from imagination 1967

Ah so he's literally quoting John. That's where it comes from. Sounds familiar. Remember the seed is the code, the structure that unfolds and grows into the pathway cascade as a capacity for expansion, and the ground is the body.

"Now turn to Isaiah 55:11. “So shall my word be that goes forth from my mouth; it shall not return to me empty, but it shall accomplish that which I purposed and fulfill that where I sent it.” So the word when it comes is The Word called Christ. I tell you the story, believe it. The minute you believe it you have accepted it, it has fallen on fertile ground. It will then take root; and the word contains within itself the power of its own expression. The whole vast program of God for man’s salvation is contained in that Word, “the seed”, and it falls upon man and man hears it. He either believes it or he rejects it." - the fourfold gospel 1963

There's an example of "fertile ground". The seed falls upon man.

"And then, from then on I find that all that was recorded of the past isn’t past at all, because nothing preceded me. I was in the beginning; I am the first of his acts of old. What first?—his creative power. It shocks man to think that God impregnates us, as his bride, it shocks us to hear it, but it’s true. Jesus Christ is the sperm of God, the creative power of God, bearing his image, and it actually penetrates and passes through the surface of this being, the soul of this being, even though on the outside there aren’t any holes, either before or after the penetration of that sperm that fertilizes the being that I am. And I become a fertile being, and the being that penetrated me is the image of God and it matures within me. When it reaches that complete perfection, like an egg it breaks and out it comes; and I, its mother, I hold in my hands the infant child, the Christ child. I can’t understand it, when did it happen? And so I wonder and I ask questions, how is it possible? I do not know a man and I have no husband. I don’t understand how this thing works. And I wait…if really this is my child, well, show me his father. And I don’t know…I can’t find the father until a further expansion. And then, five months later another terrifi c expansion and here I am looking at what was always there. Just as I said earlier, as fame begets envy, this expansion begets my son David—and, “Thou art my son”—who reveals me as a father. And I didn’t know the father of that Christ child until I reach this degree of expansion which brought David into view; and David reveals me as God the Father, and therefore I know now who was the father of the Christ child." - the smile 1965

Well Christ is the "sperm of God". The creative power. His image. His template. So then, Christ would be the capacitive template that holds the "power of God" to actually bring that transformation. The Christ is that power, literally that life giving power of activating current.

"So the story is you may find today when you observe yourself, by observing your reactions, that it’s not a very pleasant land but it is still a fertile land; it can be cleared of all these trees of traditional wrong thinking and can be replanted in harmony with the beauty that you desire. And in the immediate present it will bear fruit in harmony with the seeds you plant.

So let us go out determined to bring about a better arrangement of our mind that we may produce more noble garments for our Father to wear. For this wonderful, visible, objective universe is only the living garment of my Father, it’s not a place of exile, as so many believe, talking about home and their going home, as though they are not now in the very midst of their Father. When you see me, you see my Father. Whenever you see me, you see the state of my mind, for you will see the world in which I live and the state of my mind, that inner arrangement, that’s my Father. When you see me projected, you then call it the Son, and my world round about me tells me where I am. All these inner states are places in this fabulous psychological consciousness. Inner state is equal to place and where I stand within myself determines what I see when I look outside the self. So, when I look out upon the world, that area of my Father’s garment, whether it be torn by reason of the inner place where I stand or whether it be lovely, I see only the inner arrangement of myself. I am forever surrounding myself with the true image of myself, and what I am in consciousness that only can I see. Knowing that, let me be determined today to seek righteousness, or right consciousness, that I may reap in the immediate present all the lovely things that I desire.

Now in summary, single out some noble aim in life. Having defined it clearly to yourself as a desirable state. the state you would like to externalize, ask yourself this very simple question, “What would the feeling be like were it true if I already embodied that noble state?” In response to your question will come a feeling; assume that feeling; it has reality outside of the present moment. Its being is in complete independence of present objective fact. It has real structure; it has reality in the deep of it. It came in response to your call when you said, “What would the feeling be like were it true?” And you named what you were thinking of . . if it was security, if it was health, if it was any state, that fish came from the deep; it’s located and you took the “I” and placed it in that feeling. You were actually standing upon it though it is invisible. Now remain on it.

If you remain in that state, you are told in the Bible three days, you will be “spewed out on dry land.” “Three” doesn’t mean three days; “three” means fullness, “three” means complete. So if I will live within that fish for three days until the whole thing seems natural and seems real, and it has the sensory vividness of reality. I will then be spewed out as something objective, and something that is commonly called in the Bible “land” or “dry land.” But it does have reality, as you feel it, only people get away from it because it doesn’t have immediate objective fact to confirm it. But you ride it for your three days and you will know what it was to enter that fish and remain in it until fullness was attained, until reality was attained within. In that state you were righteous and your righteousness will speak for you in time to come. It will not fail you; it cannot fail you.

Let us go into the Silence" - your supreme dominion 1953

More on all the parts of the so called law. Just to reiterate it all in one place. This is a decent summary of the operation of the NG method. The feeling is the experience of the implication of the seed targeted to integrate within and so remaining there is simply continuing to unfold that seed into what it represents. Simple right? Well that's obviously going to play out through involvement to get into state streaks.

"Here is a vision with tremendous spiritual significance. This vision was showing her the only way that man can ever awake. You are God! You, yourself, became human for a divine purpose. You died, and at the very end you will see the symbol of what you did. It’s the story of the seed: “Unless a seed falls into the ground and dies it remains alone, but if it dies it brings forth much.” The seed of God is His image and Jesus Christ is the sperm which is buried in Man. One day he will appear in the form as I have just revealed him to you, and you will reflect the glory of God the Father and bear the very stamp of his person." - one thousand two hundred sixty days 1968

The story of the seed. Interesting view. This is a good study. The story of the seed as it unfolds, that capacity growing, just as a human grows from sperm in the egg into who you are today. Wild stuff. The death is the symbolic making life, a rebirth. That can also be represented on the macro level as God is grafted off into each of us. That's where the "death" of God happens into the soil. I just need to restate once again that the details of the senses are contained within the implication, else you couldn't "feel" that way since the currents in the pathway cascade that represent those details wouldn't fire to make you feel such. That's why it's needless to focus on sensory details. The targeted seed, state, desire, already contains all the details within it. The seeds are already there, in the pattern as it unfolds. This is why I say that we don't need to "drop seeds" but I can get what he means here since dropping seeds is really just activation by acceptance of the vision and dying to the conditions. So yeah, there is a clear method here but once again his way of DOING that is still not very expanded and detailed. The persistence despite not seeing the full things manifest is simply going all the way to the threshold of total acceptance by moving pressure. That's what the "time delay" stuff could represent.

"This is the great mystery of the seed. Unless it falls into the earth and dies, it remains alone, but if it dies it bears much fruit. God died by restricting himself to the limit of contraction and opacity of man in order to go through this world of generation and decay. He is now buried in Zion (your skull), which is the stronghold David takes by going up the spiral water-shaft. One night I felt an explosion in my skull, and when everything settled, I, God, observed my son David, my beloved in whom I am well pleased. I found my anointed and fulfilled scripture. I tell you: you are not predestined to be rich or poor, known or unknown. You are here only to fulfill sacred history." - spiritual sensation 1969

"I tell you the drama begins in this manner: God made us and we are dead and there is no way to make us alive and creative as he is, unless he buries himself in us, and this is the mystery of life through death. John 12:24: “A grain of wheat unless it falls into the ground and dies it remains alone, but if it falls and dies it brings forth much.” So he plants himself in us and is crucified on us. Listen to the crucifixion. “The crucifixion is over.” (Romans 6:5) You aren’t going to be crucified again, you are already crucified. “If we have been united with Christ in a death like his we shall certainly be united with him in a resurrection like his.” The resurrection is to be; it takes place individually. And may I tell you from experience: it is true. God’s mightiest act is the resurrection, and each individual will be resurrected, and the day that you are, you will be the most startled being in the world, because until that moment you had no idea that you were dead; you had no idea that you were entombed, it seemed so natural to walk this earth and play the part that you are playing and think you are alive. You move from the cradle to the grave thinking you are alive, and in this moment in time you are suddenly resurrected. At the moment of resurrection you become awake, aware of it in your being startled." - the bible your autobiography 1963

"But always think of Jesus Christ as the little child, always the little child who always delighted in the presence of his Father, and he was the one who always experienced the emotion of delight.

The creative power experiences that. He’s not the source of it; he’s the one who experiences the emotion of delight. When one comes to this realization and finds the little child signifying his own birth from above, thereafter he finds the son that is given. And then the son that is given reveals to him who he is, and he breaks the wheel of death. For this is the mystery of life through death: “Unless a seed falls into the ground and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, it brings forth much” (John 12:24)." - the cabala 1965

I don't know why those who transcribed this called it the "cabala" that's incorrect it's the "Kabballah". Guess they're metaphysically illiterate fools too who transcribed the sources for these lectures. Just doing their job.

"When you hear someone is hurt, don’t gloat that God is getting even; God doesn’t get even. If you hear of anyone being hurt tonight, don’t say it serves him right. No retribution at all, not in this revelation. Simply a man unknowingly falls into a state; falling into a state it could be a good state or an evil state, but he reaps the fruit of the state. But he is neither good or evil. Blake said: “I do not consider either the just or the wicked to be in a Supreme State, but to be every one of them States which the Soul may fall into in its deadly dreams of Good and Evil when it leaves Paradise following the Serpent.” Who was that serpent? God himself! For He consigned me, he consigned you . . every being in the world . . to disobedience, and we left through disobedience, for he said: “You shall not surely die.”" - the book of Job 1963

Falling into the ground, falling into the state, through a reaction. A reaction implies something to be true.

"It is God, the only God, that is actually shaping himself upon you. And when that is shaped upon you, . . this is a form, a mold, . . but this cannot inherit the kingdom of heaven; this is flesh and blood. It takes this to mold it upon it, for what is being molded upon it is God, the unbegotten, and God being Spirit he is molding himself as spirit, the immortal you. And then you, God, are clothed. Well, how could you clothe God in form? He is clothing himself in a shape and that is you, . . so he begets us. But it began with the crucifixion. The crucifixion does not end the drama, it begins the drama. So everyone becomes a breathing, living, conscious being because God died for him.

It’s the mystery of life through death, as told us in John 12:24: “Unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, it bears much fruit.” It has to fall into the earth and die, and this is the earth (the body) in God’s kingdom. And God falls into this earth and dies, he forgets that He is God in His belief that He is man. God actually becomes man that man may become God; and molds Himself; this Unbegotten Being upon man. And when He is satisfied with that molding process, it is in the eye of God that it’s perfect; therefore, if it is perfect, then God is born in man. So God actually gives Himself to us, to each of, as if there were no others in the world, . . just God and you, God and I. Believe it. The whole story of the Gospel is this story." - the crucifixion 1973

So again the overall process of the promise is reflected in the law. They're one pattern. One process. Process is all, as I've said from my physics studies. It's the one process present in all things, and that process is God.

"Like the seed, you have to be detached from the Father and fall into the ground to be made alive; for unless a seed falls into the ground it remains alone, but if it falls into the ground and dies it brings forth much. The creative power of your human imagination is the seed which falls into your fleshly body (the red earth called Adam). Hearing the word and applying its truth, your seed is made alive and begins to awake, and you realize who you really are." - the cup of experience 1967

"The Easter story begins with the resurrection. God is buried in you and this is the story of his seed. “Unless a seed falls into the earth and dies it remains alone, but if it dies it brings forth much.” Here is the story of life through death. God dies for your salvation. His death is your redemption. He was with you from the beginning, experiencing all of your pain and joy. But when he gives up this world the curtain is split, and as he is lifted up he takes himself . . now individualized . . with him. That is your ascension. Now, the resurrection is not the ascension. Your resurrection and birth from above come first. This is followed by the ascension nine months later. To the Christian world this is only a parable, for they have not stirred themselves to question it. And not everyone who hears the truth will believe it, because they have not been called to hear it . . and that goes from the Pope down." - the great mystery 1968

"Start here, in this auditorium. Look at the pictures on the walls, the speaker and the audience around you. Then feel you are moving toward the back of the room and you will see everything at a different angle. Now, your friends know your weaknesses and limitations. You share your fears with them and they share their doubts with you. The desire to move and the movement itself is an inward motion. Using the same frame of reference, move inwardly by seeing them differently, and allowing them to see you, not as they formerly did, but as you would like them to see you. If they are friends they will rejoice, and if they are not they will show envy. Whatever they are relative to you, they will express. They are your fixed frame of reference and confirmation of your motion.

Now, there are infinite states in this world, and man moves from one state to another either consciously or unconsciously. He falls into them knowingly or unknowingly, but regardless, he must reap the fruit of the state into which he has entered. That’s the law." - the primal wish 1966

Interestingly he gave some example here. So he said "the desire to move and the movement itself is an inward motion" and then went on about the frame of reference being what you see implying what you want representing the fixed frame of reference. Interesting. That's more terms to study further. The endless study goes on @_@. Such little time so much work... The story of my life. Endless studying and learning and schooling of fools. Very satisfying.

"If I want to go to New York City, let me get as close as I can ‘til finally I can get right into it. As I get into it, then think of the world for confirmation. Motion cannot be determined except by a change of position relative to some other state. If I move from here to the end of the room without some fixed frame of reference against which I move, I wouldn’t know I moved. I would have no way of knowing that I move at all. There must be some frame of reference. Well, this is a frame, the world is a frame; it remains fixed relative to me the pilgrim who moves. So I move from poverty to security, or from illness to health, and so there’s a frame of reference, and my world will reflect that motion that I make…and this is praying." - law/storytelling/picture taking

"Now, motion can only be detected by a change relative to a fixed frame of reference. What would you do to move from where you are now and what you are now, to where you want to be? Would your friends see a change in you? Would your outside world look different? Take time to sort out your desire, and when it is clearly defined move in your imagination. How do you know you have moved? By mentally looking at your world and seeing its change." - the creator 1969

More on the fixed frame of reference. Back to the seed stuff.

"So God is buried in man. And so, being buried in man it’s the story of the seed. “Unless a seed falls into the earth and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, it brings forth much” (John 12:24), and this sets forth the story of life through death. And so, I will be born into an entirely different world by dying. So God dies, and the death I described just a moment ago is this tearing of the curtain. At that moment he dies…read it carefully. And he cried out a second time in a loud voice…at that moment the curtain was split right down the middle from top to bottom, so it coincides with his death. So, those of us who have had the splitting of the curtain of the temple from top to bottom that was the moment God died for our salvation. You are redeemed at that moment. He was hanging forever on us, with us, experiencing all the pain that we’ve ever experienced and all the joys that we ever experienced. But at that moment he gave up completely the Spirit and then we were split right down. And then as he…now he tells us: “And I, if I be lifted up, or when I am lifted up, I will draw all men unto me.” And this is the manner of my death, this is how I die. It coincides with the splitting of the temple…and his body is the temple. So my body is split right down… and that was when he died…and then he ascends. That was the ascension. So, the resurrection is not the ascension. They’re separated by nine months. Not three days; nine months. The resurrection comes first and the same night comes the birth from above. So, you are born from above right on the very heels of resurrecting from within you. Then nine months later comes this day that we are now celebrating." - the real meaning of good Friday and Easter 1968

"Man first is raised from the “dead.” He doesn’t know he’s dead. He hasn’t the slightest concept that he is dead. He struggles to keep what he calls “alive.” He insures himself, burdens himself with all insurances just to keep alive. He takes all the things in the world just to keep going. He calls this being “alive.” But he doesn’t know he’s dead. He is actually dead, and it is for a purpose.

God actually “died” when He dropped Himself in me! He dropped Himself in me as his “seed,” and His “seed” is Christ Jesus. And He has to “die” to be made alive. A seed must fall into the earth. Man is called the “red earth.” “Adam” means “red earth.” So, he falls into the earth and “dies” in order to be made alive.

“Unless the seed falls into the ground and dies, it remains alone but if it dies, it brings forth much.” [John 12:24] And so, it comes in and drops into the mind of man. It’s the Word of God. The story is all about you individually . . not collectively." - signs of the end 1967

"So, the seed was alive when it was planted in the ground, but it had to “die” to be made alive. So, we are told, “Unless the seed falls into the ground and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, then it bears much fruit.” It cannot remain dead. It’s alive first, it falls, and it dies. So, Christ literally . . the Seed of God . . it’s called “sperma” in Scripture. It’s the sperm. Literally translated, it means “the seed” . . the actual seed from the Creative Power of God, buried in man; and then it comes out as man." - same lecture

"In the interval . . all these things we sin against . . we fall into states. A man falls into the state of feeling sorry for himself. Knowing the law, instead of arguing with the man, just take him out of it. He may fall in again twenty-four hours later. A friend called me today and my wife answered the phone, and he said: ‘What news have you of Vicki?’ She said: ‘We are very pleased with her report.’ He answered: ‘Pleased? I wish I could say pleased about things concerning myself.’ He has been coming to my lectures for years. He was here last week. After years of saturation, he cannot conceive of feeling happy. And you tell him morning, noon, and night that these are states . . that if you put yourself in a state of being wanted, you will be wanted. The state of being unwanted, then you will not be wanted. It will go on forever. He cannot believe in this reality. I have brought him out unnumbered times, and yet I must never falter. ‘How often must I forgive? Seventy times seven.’ If he calls me a thousand times I still must pull him out, and you go over it all again. You and I who know this principle must forgive seventy times seven and not ignore him, because he will not do it himself. If he wants to lean, let him lean. One day when he least expects it, suddenly the whole story of Jesus Christ will unfold within him, and he is Jesus Christ." - the sin against the holy ghost 1963

"Man falls into these states unwittingly. You take someone, and without their knowledge or consent draw them into a level state and persuade yourself it is true. Though you have no evidence to confirm it, you persuade yourself it is so, and suddenly you will hear and he will confirm the fruit that he is hearing. But if you don’t do it and you believe all the things you hear and see in the course of a day, you are moving unnumbered (persons) into all kinds of confusing states. I say: don’t be concerned, but do practice freeing individuals from the sin that is forgivable. You could forgive every being in this world before He breathes upon you and gives you the gift of the Holy Spirit. You still can forgive. Everyone can do it." - same lecture

"Well I have told you the story. I have written the story; so if you try to tell it, . . well, you have heard someone who has experienced the story. Now you can tell it. I’ve told it in a chronological order, just as it happened to me. And here in this wonderful story, the whole story begins with the crucifixion. Now how can you tell a story of the nature that is told in the gospel, and begin with death? And yet, this is the mystery of life through death. Unless the seed falls into the ground and dies, it remains alone. But if it dies, it brings forth much. So, “unless I die, thou canst not live; but if I die, I shall arise again.” (John 12 : 24)

So I must die. I empty myself of all that I am in order to take upon myself the weaknesses, the limitations of man and become man. And I must be completely forgetful of the Being that I AM. I can’t pretend that I AM. If I pretend that I AM, I am simply masquerading in the flesh. I have to completely die; and that is the beginning of the drama, . . a complete amnesia as to who I am. And only in the end, having formed within me that which is called Christ, which is David, does David awaken me by standing before me. And then, memory returns. Then I know who I AM." - the son revealed 1969

"I will tell you, all will make it, but all are not ready to make it. That was an adumbration. That was a foreshadowing of what is in store for everyone in this world. This is the mystery of life. . through-death. Unless a seed, or the grain of wheat, falls into the ground and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, it brings forth much." - who Paul really is 1971

"When we speak of sin, don’t let anyone scare you about sin. He comes to forgive the sinner. His only interest is in the sinner. The so-called moral violations . . forget it! I do not ask you to violate them, but forget them. Everything will be ironed out. It is my duty. Through the consciousness of Paul, Ezekiel, Jesus . . “If I don’t tell you what I know of God’s law, then your sin is upon my head; but if I tell you and you still will not believe me, you will die in your sin, but your blood will not be upon my head.” So Paul said: “I will tell them. I have declared the entire counsel of God to them, so I am innocent of their blood.” Infinite states. A man falls into a state and so he is in the state, but he is not the state. Take him out of the state by saying while he is in the state: “What would you like?” and he names the state that he would like to enter. And you put him into that state by asking what it would be like if he were now the thing he would like to be; and you remain faithful . . leaving him where he is . . but you remain faithful to this concept and he comes out of it. On reflection, he might say: “It would have happened anyway.” It is all right . . you know. Tell everyone the story, and tell them it is entirely up to them. If they believe it . . as we are told: “If you do not believe I AM He you die in your sins.” (John 8) When you read it, you might think a man is telling you: I am God, and you are not. The whole story is taking place in the soul of man. That is the story." - you can forgive sin 1963

That's all of them. That's every quote about seed falling into the ground.

19/12/25

Dropping pressure to compromise in itself can manifest the changes in people. The way you drop it by involvement with the implication of the importance no longer mattering, to move the pressure and the currents that alter the pathway cascades you fire. That's a "reaction" that's different and shows faith. This I've noticed can change people in your life too.

Expansion through involved action that's "risky" and will lead to you possibly losing something is the most powerful, since we expose ourselves directly to God. If you read what NG really meant, about dying, it's all about exposure to higher function, higher cause, higher illumination of self and the only way to do that is through involving yourself into experiences of high pressure and come out the other end in a greater position than before. That's how ALL alchemy is done. Separate the components, take the lower components into a higher order state where purification can happen and then take those separated purified components and put them back together again into the new arrangement. This new arrangement is the altered pathway cascade, and the altering force is illuminating starlight that you can ONLY feel under pressure, when you "die" to your older limited composition and arrangement to then alter the field geometry.

Experiences of high pressure are the only way to die. Any "positive" experience that's accepted MUST by extension burn off ties that bind you to the conditions against accepting that state. Nothing else. Real risks, the more risk, the higher the reward. That means more of you is exposed to starlight. You will FEEL it as more warmth in your body when you're making that action, that moment where you're literally juiced up with so much energy not out of anything other than the implication being so great that you have no option but to kill off a massive part of your dysfunctional trash.

There is zero opportunity in meaningless pleasure. Imagining for pleasure sake holds no transformation. Therefore, if NG is serious about expansion, as I've quoted him talking about in various passages, then clearly the imaginal scene that implies the wish fulfilled MUST imply death of the trash and therefore induce pressure. Every coaching client I've had that I've applied this method for has had RADICAL results. It WORKS and I can prove that with 100% success rates. A client I spoke to last week had a massive uncontrolled shedding of tears and grieved his losses from his past and he let go of all the trash that bound him into constantly seeing comfort through unconsciously "performing" to be seen, since that was his way of getting attention. He broke down and lost himself, and yet what came out of that was strength you wouldn't believe. In the last week his reactions to the world are VERY different, and he's cut off so much trash and he was himself surprised it happened and never expected he'd willingly say no the way he was. He's changed a lot in just a week, after I tore his sense of self to absolute shreds. The harder I act as the divine intelligence and break you down into nothing but fine dust, the deeper your transformation will be, but the results will reflect a radically different life and it will almost be surprising the way you respond by default. You will not expect it. It will just happen, since you moved the pressure and rearranged the thematically associated pathway cascades.

What we miss in this modern world is risk and danger that's cheered for and sought out. I'm not talking about stupid types of danger like throwing yourself off cliffs with wingsuits on, though for some that can be very transforming, but I mean for example removing the safety guards from more sports, because knowing that there's a real risk of injury only opens up the game for higher levels of performance to be NECESSARY and for you to personally STRIVE to EXPANSION that's MEANINGFUL and not just for participation. Being the best becomes a game of extreme wit and drive beyond what we already have. Having REAL danger, REAL risk, REAL pressure that cannot be avoided because you're willingly facing that, this is where true heroes and idols that we can look up to as characters of immense inner mastery are found. Nobody worth their salt exists today. It's all about "safety" and removing all the risk which stifles expansion under pressure. This modern world is designed to keep us as small as possible so that we never seek expansion. That trash needs to be seen for what it is and eradicated.

If you want to understand yourself to a much higher ideal, you WILLINGLY place yourself into experiences of high pressure to force catabolic reactions on an alchemical level. This is direct spiritual transformation and WILL change how you see yourself and the world around you, as well as how the world views you in response. Modern manifesting has no pressure applied, there's no meaningful transformation, there's just meaningless participation that's encouraged. This is why only a few people in LOA get places, and no it's not all about relaxing. Relaxing more SHOULD be important since you will want to carry dynamic gazing with you as much as possible, but that should never detract from the necessity of meaningfully exposing yourself to pressure. If people in LOA want results, they need to face experiences that put them under pressure in meaningful ways to expand the innate capacities. In order for phase change, high pressure must be felt, and cut through. Going all the way is necessary for radical change in your life, else you'll run up against the same box and never actually die. Turn your head from the need to conform to any box except that which is looking upwards towards God. Challenge is no longer encouraged and supported.

When society is entering a parasitic era, it is when meaningful challenge is being actively marketed against as the people seek further and further realms of comfort and meaningless pleasure. The solipsistic view of me-ism comes out of this in response, where the individual and their pursuits of one upping the rest of the sick people around them becomes the only challenge. Comparisons between who can have the most eyes on their content, who can hit the best scoop on controversy, who can look the best, who can pull the most attractive woman, who can show off the most attainment in the sick status game of this sick world devoid of meaningful expansion. The expansion happens within the bounds of false pleasures, who can master pseudo pseudo satisfaction, because it's rewarded since that's where the collective consciousness circulates and where the systems that monetize that are rewarding such participation. Ad revenue for example, this is what many people live on. It's because it's made available since that's the meaningful available game to be played to compete in. In a world where such means of availability is only through real meaningful involvement with risk, then needless comparisons wouldn't be made just for pleasure sake since involvement is encouraged for expansion purposes and you're rewarded for such. Nobility of old, often times would be rewarded in society for attaining feats of high regard, most often through coming out of extremely high pressure experienced, provided that nobility wasn't inherited through name or money. Real aristocracy of old was in many cases formed out of heroism, people who attained feats the average person would only dream of attaining, and thus those people earned respect not from participating in sick societal norms the most or looking the most attractive and thus stimulating to the senses, but more or less through pushing themselves through meaningful expansion of the spirit which we all intuitively "know" how difficult that is, and thus respect is universally garnered.

This is why most modern zoom guys truly feel that their lives are meaningless, that striving for expansion has NO WHERE TO GO. The women of the zoom gen are all rewarded for playing the system, playing in the sick game, and the men who seek expansion are destroyed by the system. We have this warped middle ground now where participation is still necessary to some degree, and yet there's still no higher ideal that's supported by it and thus pursuits of expansion must be undertaken in personal space. This is going away though, as I believe the last decade has reached that threshold of true degeneracy just as it has in the past at times, though with the online spaces supporting this far more than ever, now the pressure for expansion as the pendulum swings the other way is necessary and will happen. Race wars will play out as well, and they're much much needed to separate peoples from their incompatible states. It's just a big mixing up of a bunch of polarity hoping some parts stick, when nothing really ever does because the intrinsic nature cannot stick. There will always be conflict fundamentally, all the way up to the highest levels of awareness that is. The noble who sits with a noble from another format of human, those two are both bound by their proverbial respective self sacrifice on the cross. They both died, and thus that invisible language of aura permeates both, despite holding vastly different qualities of life. Really the incompatibilities is that the compromised people of different racial backgrounds cannot hold space for each other since their differences bring out their own feelings of compromise and lack of meaningful expansion. I strongly believe that this is a factor that underlies why mixing people cannot ever happen, because that condition cannot ever be made true in this reality since reality seeks expansion of the individual as the fundamental principle for the purpose of existence. Culturally, racially, these differences ARE innate, though connection can be attained through shared responsibility for expansion. Nobody inwardly truly respects their colour polarity, We really don't, and the only ones who do are either rewarded for saying that or they share a sentiment of shared self sacrifice for expansion purposes with that person. This then, for the same type of people, can be only further amplified with the respect that person earned.

This seems to be something we see universally. When the world around you, the rules of engagement, are no longer rewarding meaningful expansion but degenerate participation, then we will have a very very sick society play out until the walls come down and the compromise is forced to be faced. We must learn to exclude inferiority in life, and be shameless about it. Those who seek to stay conditioned need to be made painfully aware of their ignorant self delusion in conforming to pseudo satisfaction that the system rewards. You as a master of RS must learn to grow into an intolerant individual who makes no friends with anyone who's not also seeking upwards movement towards God, lest they trample you in their ignorance and your tolerance. We are not here to see everyone by default in higher states as NG likes to believe, we are here to exalt ourselves through meaningful earned expansion that's then in respect going to allow our natural expression to see the capacity for transformation in others as we look down on them and their immense ignorance of self capacity through the meaningless rewards of the sick system. Exclusion of inferior culture, inferior status, inferior quality of participation, exclusion even of race, there needs to be no boundaries to the length if we are real. This has nothing to do with the other in comparison other than that we show up in the world to the degree that the other will stand with us in their own expansive process of movement towards God in meaningful ways. Different people, racial natures, have a different metaphysical foundation they stand on, and thus will seek expansion to a greater degree in meaningful ways than others. Want to prove this. Look at who built the world. There's your answer. The ones who struggled the most and failed the most and yet continued to push through the pressure innovated and expanded and built the world we stand on today. The rest, failed the test. Irrefutable facts of differentiation on a spiritual level based on genetic makeup, and yet in the west we're being forced to accept those who cannot share the same foundational degree of desire for expansion and striving for God. Throwing that useless trash out that different people approach God in different ways is cope trash that needs to be eradicated as such. No people worth their salt would live the way some of them to despite access to immense resources beyond what they'd otherwise have in todays world. It's pure cope.

Getting real has always been the way forward. Always has and always will. The nicety to die, to see our own point of comparison within us, to FEEL that natural striving, this is the ONLY thing we have no free will to avoid. We have free will in pretty much every way except this. There is no way of stopping expansion and the pressure to unfold that within you. It's impossible, because if you exist you're under the hospices of God driving you for his glory and pleasure to see you attain immortality. The alchemist reiterated to me today that we're one out of billions who are only here as an OPPORTUNITY to attain glory, the robe of glory, when the holy spirit puts on the robe then we have the complete anointing of the Christ and the death of man as the man is taken into being a God through owning his innate inheritance as such. To own that capacity means to own who you are, your individuated innate nature is your map towards divine anointing. It's the only map you have, and RS has made it 100% clear how to navigate that in all ways possible.

We are all equal in capacity. Never forget that. CAPACITY. We are NOT all equal now, just as we a not ALL GOD now. We are God in CAPACITY. That capacity determines your life, depending on how far you have unfolded it. The only way to unfold it is to die, to progress along the process of expansion as ones self. Remember NG himself taught continual expansion too as I've quoted, so nobody can throw at me the trash of needing to "earn" it. Yeah he said we don't need to earn the promise, since the promise is the only thing we cannot have free will to avoid, and thus naturally as an effect of dying, which remember is a core aspect of his doctrine too as I've irrefutably proven relating to seeds dying in the ground (the state), it would then necessitate that those who follow NG take seriously the tenants that RS has outlined in a fully systematic and practically oriented way. Manifesting change in life that's functional and satisfying comes only out of dying, as he himself proved with all the quotes I listed in the last 2 pages of the notebook going over it all. Nobody can deny these facts, so apply them or continue to waste time in compromise and feel the trash that comes as a result of decaying. Don't decay, become immortal. That's why you exist, it's the only reason.

Remember, experiences under high pressure in themselves are what reveal to us parts of us that we otherwise wouldn't access, since there's no incentive to because it hurts, Willingly involving in experiences in this world which push your limits, and involve risk, the risk of metaphysical death, those experiences teach you the most, reveal in you the most, expand you the most, and truly satisfy the hunger for experiences of God since illumination that comes off the back of being in the thick of high pressure experiences which you feel that "I'm about to die" internal feeling, that will be your ticket to heaven. We are all guaranteed to enter heaven, top down that is. The higher genius is guaranteed to enter heaven, but your specific emanation is not. I do not subscribe to what NG says about how we all die and end up in a new world like this one, because it doesn't work with what we observe and I can almost guarantee he was observing people who died and went to the underworld where they were seen by him based on how he saw scripture. What most don't get is that internally when you journey to these different states of reality, how you see it depends on how your subjective synthesis is operating, meaning your view of cosmology of reality and if NG saw this and bases his belief on "personal experience" without understanding that his context for such thematic representation to his senses will be tainted, then he cannot speak of such as fact. He cannot prove that, and nowhere in any system ever written including scripture does it support the rebirth as he claims after death, so all of you who are passively operating in life without facing pressure because you believe you'll get another shot are only shooting yourself in the foot and claiming that it feels good because you're so deep in cope it's not even funny. You're a copemaxxer and it's never going to end until a high contrast experience that challenges what you believe to be true and for you to accept that you're dead wrong in order to change the direction of expansion. Get real with how you feel and be willing to face the pressure that emerges out of such introspection. You will not be rewarded for it, and that's why you're in cope, because the people around you are not attaining the same degree of expansion and you're comfortable living in the narrow shrunk life of the rest of the fools who deny the reality of their existence,

You have access to RS, the greatest metaphysical system ever written, by a 22 year old when I started publishing RS online. It's been a few years now, but you have access to this notebook to drive you. Every answer is available here. Own it. Go all the way.

Being extremist should be considered a badge of honor in a sick world. You're not built for this world, you're way above it. Don't let it pull you down into the snares, and don't gaslight yourself into compromising to fit in with such parasitic ideology that's only propagated because it's profitable and socially accepted. Screw all that trash. Burn it to the ground and go all the way. Take an honest look at your life and all the people you overlap in reality. Now ask yourself if they're on the same path or if they're just there to keep as useful company. Cut out all the trash that seeks to pull you down and remind you of lower states. Hold some boundaries for who you let into your divine space.

Pain and suffering are the only things guaranteed in this world, and that's because the only thing guaranteed is an irrevocable need to expand towards God. Because God exist so you will feel pressure. That's why mastering the innate reality of existence on an alchemical level is essential then to ride the waves of transformation and not actually suffer. If feeling pressure is unavoidable no matter what, then mastering that pressure to operate according to functional cycles of transformation is how you live the most "successful" life, irrespective of what's supported by the collective consciousness since your contract with God trumps all of those subjective necessities to appease conditions. We must learn to ride the dynamism of life, ride the cycles of pressure and release, relaxation, yin and yang, as to become one with God as you integrate the alchemical fire and light of the star to become the stone for which the star can live through. There is no escape from this reality. Reality Synthesis.

Get schooled by the master.

20/12/25

So what I've noticed is that any time you take damage you're going to restore your vitality back stronger than before IF you're supplied to do so. Being broken down metaphysically speaking, and physically as an extension, facilitates expansion.

The "death" of the Christ on the cross metaphysically speaking is the breaking down of what's not to reveal what was already there underlying that in capacity which like a phoenix rises from the ashes that were burned away. Exposure to high pressure grows us. This is why reality is called the "fiery furnaces" as NG says. We must go through inevitable pressure (remember NG said it's INEVITABLE and WILL happen) in order to birth the Christ child. This is necessary to manifest anything better in our lives, else you never truly die to the current conditions. This is a core principle we all observe. A recent client of mine in the 90 day ended up going through massive pain spontaneously and days later had radical transformation, only because I made him question his pleasures in life. I made him question the authority of pseudo satisfaction and it worked. It always works. I've never seen it fail. If NG is worth his salt, and properly explained this principle (which he did if you piece it together) then you'll see that what he really taught, that would work, is to break yourself down like this using what you want as the catalyst for transformation. He's more or less getting you to willingly experience what you want under the context of the trash conditions and to then "die" to the conditions. The seed dies in the ground and is born again. The pathway cascades alter their arrangement. This is what's going on. The only way to change the orientation is to break it down under pressure. This is an alchemical fact that's present and woven through all facets of reality itself, and chemistry is probably one of the most clear examples of this.

We must ask ourselves where meaning and implication comes from. Importance. What is importance. Importance is activating of vital current, or a lack of it felt as a contrast. It's the feeling of a change in homeostatic conditions of a system. Importance is a pressure to resolve order. This is why we desire. This is what desire is. Desire is a pressure to mediate order through experience. Experience therefore, brings order. Unfolding the thematic sequence of the Jing. Unless we HAVE the experience fully then we are unable to satisfy that pressure to restore order to the system, and thus we will go through dysfunctional cycles of pseudo satisfaction to avoid going all the way through the necessary experience which brings order into the disordered system.

Manifesting doesn't bypass the responsibility of expansion towards God. It is the same mechanism. If people were to apply LOA in a time where riches and wealth and love was meaningfully available, like England in the mid 1360's for example, then how we interpret scripture would be vastly different since needs are no longer the same. the pursuit of higher ideals is available, The only reason the world sucks like it does right now and that LOA is so popular is because we're looking in the wrong direction. You're looking to solve a problem that's needless to solve. Manifesting riches, love, bla bla bla, is meaningless and will never satisfy the pressure to have an experience of God. A meaningful experience of God is expansion beyond the expectations of the world, though in this world that's made more available now than ever to partake in. It's next to impossible not to contrast the collective established narrative run by psychopathic Juize. In a world where order and systems that you belong to and are supported by will only then support further meaningful expansion, provided that pressure is felt. The rason why pressure is felt so greatly today is because nothing is working for almost anyone. Why? Because the supporting structure that underlies a social fabric where relationships especially has been turned into a business of transaction and meaning is replaced with corporatization for the personalized profits of involvement in the social fabric. Really, it's that we've been stripped of what made us, us, in the social sense. The corporatization has only come in the place of what already was and is innate. The belonging to a group is necessary for your life to exist as functional, for the most part. Without a structural system to integrate within, then social bonds are formed out of personal gain and not obligation to the support of said structure which supports all members of such, because participation mutually benefits. In this day though, that's being torn down, and arguably already has. So I'm not telling you to support such system and go out of your way to protect such a structure, and nor and I suggesting that this infers the shifting of personal expansion responsibility onto the group, but that we simply have our foundational belonging clearly identified so that we have available to us expected social contracts available without the need for conditional exchange to partake in such a "social market" which is only a term that exists because of parasitic ideologies permeating the modern world. This is why modern dating is called a "market" which is just insane if you ask me. Always thought that term is a disgusting warping on what should be functional social order, and not about a dog eat dog system where the ones who hold the most value according to the metrics of success in the sick society get the benefits of such. The sick are rewarded for participation and thus who would then want to go against such a system? Only those who dare to break the trash down and have the drive to expand THROUGH THAT MEANS. The means of breaking it down and going into your own direction IS the transformational path, therefore it has value.

What you need to recognize here is that going against social fabrics is in itself expanding because you're holding to a fundamental truth that requires you to step on peoples toes instead of being rewarded for going with the flow. This is how I believe the transition from dysfunctional systems of degeneracy transfer into a functional one, through the ones who seek expansion above fitting in with what is obviously an intrinsically known to be degenerative involvement that they FEEL is leading them to lose themselves. We have within us a sense of this innate direction of what is and isn't expanding, and as the expectation becomes more and more dysfunctional relative to that fixed point of comparison then things continue to suck more for those who participate and involve until they either throw themselves away fully or they snap and become a dissenter. Welcome to RS. Torn to shreds and back again. You cannot separate peroneal transformation front the collective roles we're expected to partake in, they mediate each other. The collective scenarios play out the stage by which personal involvement can take place by offering a decision to go with the degenerate flow or die to birth a form of self that's greater than could otherwise really be possible in such an environment. The external dysfunction and expectation to conform becomes the means of expansion in itself, and that is why the pendulum swings happen throughout time, and are also by extension predictable to the very second they occur. The more we get in touch with the values of meaningful metaphysical death to build a world around us for the better then the more our personal satisfaction will skyrocket. Belonging contributes towards personal growth, though the liberated mind would see that as the opposite and would then in such case only reveal a mind of such childlike dysfunction that seeks to destroy order in order to rebel against an inner state of agitation. There is no form or harmony, and thus chaos must be created and others must be expected to conform to that control can be felt on the partakers who involve in such ideology and gain value from it. For those people, that ideology of such chaos and revolution (think bolshevism) will be functional for their necessary expansion to unfold the implications of their conditioning, though that means that the rest will need to suffer under a state of disharmony.

We are not here to partake in anything that doesn't expand the self, that's what I know to be true. This whole thing where everyone is yourself pushed out, do not view any of it in any way other than that others show up to reveal in you elements of necessary expansion to process. That's it. People who you bump into therefore are predetermined thematically speaking. Decoding everyone is you pushed out to be literally everyone is a figment of your imagination is purely a psychosis and everyone who teaches that obviously is delusional and heavily compromised in their own expansion. Those people are the most insane of all, because it's solipsistic in such a view, where moral relativism is the only thing that matters. All throughout the work of NG, there has been an absolute frame of reference explored, though in order to integrate within such, you must master the self fully. How do you do that? You do it through death, meaningful death through the implications of dysfunctional trash being irrelevant that bound you in the box before. We are not here for anything other than for personal experience to expand, though as we all know, that must be contained within a system by which we rely on others to survive, to some degree or another. Without the food trucks running and the farmers producing crop and livestock to consume, then you starve to death. Those systems aren't in place because you imagined them, they're in place because that's a condition for our survival. It's the peak of insanity to assume that the vital support systems will always be there for you as well, because your assumptions have zero influence on the outer collective trajectory outside of the thematic sequences that you're destined to unfold, the lessons you need to learn to become a suitable vessel to house God. NG did teach we have lessons to learn here, and if that's the case then the law isn't the goal of your existence. Pleasure and indulgence of the senses is really the last thing reality or the law cares about, and yet everyone wants to operate with this as their foundation.

Group identification is a core missing part in understanding how LOA works. To the uninitiated who only wants pleasure in life they will disregard such, though the very circumstances they navigate will come down to these factors, including also to a degree what they even desire to begin with based on the collective situation they're anchored within. Lots of people want love in this world, though love is stimulation of the senses. Someone illuminates within you fragments of your psyche that need to be seen, and their vitality illuminates and stimulates you through what they represent/imply about what's now available to you. It's a thematic supply/demand process as I've ALWAYS taught, and thus manifesting any SP always comes down to providing more supply than them so that you will illuminate their desire for vitality. This is always the basis of love. Always was and always will be, though within that is obviously the psychological level of necessary illumination of conditioned responses that this person will either validate or not, thus driving a tendency to "love" them because they illuminate dysfunctions in us to play the role of a parental figure for example. That's just how it is, most people who come through coaching want an SP like their parents. The goal of my coaching almost every time is to reveal to this person why the SP they want really isn't who they actually want, because they intrinsically don't in truth. They ONLY want that person because they can play a role in stabilizing agitation. ONLY. They are a means by which unresolved conflicts can be played out. That's it. You don't consciously think that but that's what ALL love is based on without exception. The harsh fact is that nobody loves anyone, because it's always transactional on some level, including first "puppy love" that so many people put on a pedestal as "innocent love" which is insane because those people feel so stimulated not just because it's a first interaction with someone intimately and to share vital currents that way but because it's their first chance to experience the psychological expression of their unresolved conflicts in a personal manner and that is exciting. I know because that's how it was for me as well, not knowing what was going on of course. It's almost always dysfunction leading to stimulation in those places. It's the same with most things in life. Pleasure and relaxation come off the back of the contextual awareness of knowing everything is ok, because you've satisfied the innate need to move pressure. The CONTEXTUAL awareness is what matters with that, the implications, meanings not just for yourself in a vacuum but how that impacts others and by extension then the expansion you experience in response.

So this is why I say group identification is a key factor in making any of this work, since that's collectively necessary for satisfaction as well as in smaller familial circles as well. There's tons of data showing that we intrinsically reject those of other groups, culturally, socially, economically even, and most important, racially. Intrinsically nobody holds value for those who aren't like them, because the opportunity for meaningful expansion cannot come through those types of people. Thus throwing them all into a pool together and stirring the proverbial waters will only create mush that's unappealing to any of the groups involved. Opportunity therefore is taken away, dysfunction is encouraged, identification and meaning on the CONTEXTAL level is stripped, and now we begin to search for meaning in stupid ways that validate whatever conditions we have unconsciously circulating as a means of moving pressure and mediating transformation since other means of availability to perform that function have been dissolved and made unavailable. Do you get what I mean now? The availability for opportunity and supply to make transformation available in a stable and supported way is dead, but that environment in itself will force more meaningful change in those who don't care about others. You only transcend by removing the importance from the groups that you're told are just as equal and important as you. This sounds harsh but it's the fact. The more we disregard groups that do not fit to serve the function of that supportive structure and be totally uncompromising about such, then the more we establish order in our own reality. It's just the mechanics of polarities and the dynamics of pressure mediation to establish order out of forces and environments of chaos to establish such a contextual basis that leads to satisfaction which is MORE AVAILABLE AT BASELINE. Mental health issues skyrocket when a means of meaningful discharge are taken away, which is what I'm talking about, and thus the LOA element comes in. You're suffering not exclusively because you're failing at the game, but because you're trying to place too much importance on the game to begin with. Disconnecting from needing to even involve with those conditions will free you from so much.

Putting these factors in a course that's premium seems like blasphemy in this community but I don't care because it's the cold hard facts and people will in time consider this work to be the pinnacle of manifestation doctrine when nobody else had the guts to call things for what they were. The reality is that segregation of dysfunction is necessary to establish satisfaction, acceptance of innate self, and to establish an environmental story context that's serving the progression towards your own meaningful experience and expansion. These factors cannot be separated. They're always involved, we will all want to manifest money more in a system that's bankrupting us, not because personally we failed but because the availability of such factors is raising the bar for which necessary involvement becomes a far more important task than should otherwise be. The reason why is because you're tolerating other people stepping on your toes and not getting out of the way by detaching importance from letting them play such a role in your reality, and thus providing an obvious example of "everyone is you pushed out". That's what it ACTUALLY means. Segregation and boundaries make or break a hero from completing their journey. Knowing when to extend and when to withdraw matters the most out of any factor really, because that sets the contextual foundation of "cords" you're bound to which will leech the vitality out of you. This is where we are today. There's a big parasite on all of our backs called Is-Ra-El and until that leech is removed through swift action then you'll just continue to be a host for such parasitism. Why tolerate such degeneracy? It reminds me of the original days of when I was writing about the painter, and a big chunk of my audience bailed out on RS and saw me as the enemy because they're still psychologically children who can't question authority still, lest they be rended. Things suck not because of your assumptions, they do, but the way you navigate the circumstances can become satisfying if you orient your direction according to what's necessary, and that will almost certainly mean you're going to have to play group identification games to some degree to regain your independence and autonomy in this world. Fitting in with dysfunction only feeds your own delusions because you can't say no to what seems like another human, like you, though we know that long term function cannot be squeezed out of such arrangements and thus it's the best move to cut out the cancer from our hands and feet while we can easily do it.

Anyone who sees such as negative can go jump in a lake and kiss the bottom of the moss filled ground and then come tell me how it tasted.

The fact is that we will always go through cycles of where people support each ideology because that's necessary for expansion. Chaos will always come out of order, and Juize have always played that role, mostly through fiat financing of making available such ideology to younger impressionable minds which will then propagate without any way the established systems of order can really prevent. That's just how it is. My study of NG is pretty clear with the whole view of things. In order for us to see all as God, which fundamentally is correct obviously, we must first experience all the necessary views requires to integrate an non care for any group ideologies. Thing is to get there, playing within group ideologies is necessary, and thus the shifting polarity over time MUST play out to facilitate this process of integration of innate revelation. You will find some who claim to not take any sides, and yet NG himself took sides if you pay attention to his lectures. I've got a private study on that which I've not published yet but he clearly had biases. We all do, because you cannot exist without SOME form of polarity taking precedent, though that form of polarity will be necessary for expansion, and thus neither end are fundamentally "incorrect" in their own means of reaching a higher state, though if we look at what stabilizes material and social foundation, then being separatist is very functional. Nobody is colourblind, and it's functional to see the segments of such a rainbow as they are and recognize their value, or lack thereof, lest you be dragged down into degeneracy with the established expectations of such groups to fit in. That problem CANNOT be avoided, though it's made a problem to discuss in the first place because we are run by powers who operate through creating chaos, and thus also by extension speed up expansion. This is the truly enlightened view on polarity, as mechanical and how that impacts us personally.

Too bad the LOA space is too immature to handle such material being published. Screw all of those people. Maybe I should just do it anyway and not give a damn. None of them have a leg to stand on in refuting such a position anyway other than projecting lacks onto me, which will be repelled like paper balls being thrown at a solid concrete wall.

Yeah there's more than enough data that supports this reality. Experiments done decades back before things were even 1/20th as bad clearly outline the importance of group homogeneity for social and economic function and mental health. We're all told that we have to manifest away our issues, when in reality the issues are around us and facing the pressure to solve the problem at the root is the real solution. Ignorance only makes it worse. Nobody in LOA can explain why things are the way they are. The fact is that the suffering we face is not just a personal struggle, so do not blame yourself for everything. You were abused and still are being abused and want to gaslight yourself out of what's really going on within. Do not see yourself as less for seeing the issues as they are. I'm fully aware of all the NG LOA study, I just did that work. A vast majority of that doesn't even apply to you who's reading this because you're not expanded enough for it, and really neither am I at this stage. Thus we're operating at the level where necessitated processes of expansion lead us closer to that view, though beating yourself up because you can't magically change people is insanely self destructive. Your anxiety is able to be branched off, or it is able to be properly transformed through recognizing the lesson, or compromise pattern and false expectation you're assuming is important to buy into. Now the interesting thing is that when someone is at the stage of being disconnected from the importance of those social level variables and lives almost in a vacuum then as soon as those variables show up you'll often find a higher charge show up in them that's not usually felt, because contextually the IMPLICATION of what that means about them, and what they found to be important TO THEM brings out the compromise. Involvement in resolving conflicts on that level were ignored and branched off from, though the roots often still fester until they're made conscious again. Those who put their time into aiding their own people and sacrificed for them would often feel the most charge raise, that implies that the work they did to raise an environment that would be constructive for, for example, their own kind of children to be raised in through a functional system that's going to always be there to support their growth. That would make someone who spent vitality to establish that which has now been ruined under rainbow culture feel resentful at those who did this to their environment they put time into building up as supportive of their own people. No duh, that's a healthy response, and shouldn't be shamed, though that person in therapy would be told their feelings are invalid if they went to have dialogue. You see the issue and how silence and compromise fester to make the issue worse right.

The reason why in the past I would've said that this didn't matter, that none of that mattered, to some degree at least, is that I never connected fully what I said last night into this observation of environmental shift. It's true that personal experience that's expanding necessitates pressure to be cut through, and these means are opportunities for then the personal experience of transformation to play out. Did you get that? The conditions we face ARE a means by which expansion can play out. Therefore, I shouldn't need to even say what's correct or incorrect for someone to involve in. Whatever leads to expansion is necessary. That's just the fact. So that's why I don't need to now come out and say anything about how it's your responsibility to fix the issue. You can't individually anyway, because the timing of this is all God to be the judge of, but your process of expansion can be accelerated through these opportunities for self sacrifice. Part of what led me to recognizing so many facts is that I lived and breathed the death of the me who fit into ANY box out there. I murdered who I was so brutally that there's nothing left but dust in the wind. That opened me up to not giving a damn about any conditions when it comes to these types of issues, because I am so comfortable in discussion that I can see through all the trash other people have yet to cut through, which is 99/9% still. I lost everything to attain clarity on metaphysics, literally everything, but it was expanding, and even if the personal gain that I gain from this iteration, that expansion of consciousness and recognizing these thematics and their role leads the next one to carry on that work at baseline without needing to sacrifice the same since that awareness will be more and more innate.

I strongly believe that the ancestors who followed true traditional alchemical systems knew much of this and sought glory above pretty much all else, other than obviously building a functional family first since pretty much all unconditioned humans want that. There is obviously family trauma lineage within that as well, but that's a totally different issue. Overall living hard and fast and radical leads to greater personal development and development of the higher genius through you. The "work yet to be done in him" speeds up. Remember "repentance" is in the terms of NG a "radical change of attitude". We know that attitude and moods in his terms overlap almost 100% and moods imply something about you that you return to by habit, so operating from that continual fire of expansion will only bring more experiences of such nature through you. That seeking of rapid radical transformation often occurs through frequent death and rebirth cycles according to how your intuitive impulse moves you. Thing is that because you've built comfort for a certain state and established a life around that baseline you'll not want to give it up since too much will need to change and that change is the most painful thing next to death itself, because it's metaphysical death. That death however is growth, else how does the seed drop into the ground and die, and thus grow the new tree? It can't. That's how all of this works. It's not about really "taking risks" but that those risks often to the conditioned consciousness means death of that habitual state. It's not really a risk, not to God. God needs you to involve in change all the time, but you can't accept it. This is why being radical is necessary, since the direction towards such transformation comes only through that pathway. That is how we manifest massive changes in life. You become someone unrecognizable.

I also don't know why but every single bottle I've opened today, water, fuel canisters, jars, they've all had high pressure inside the vessel. Is something going on with the atmospheric pressure? I have no idea. It's just strange. Every single lid I've opened today has had the "ppssshhtt" where highly pressurized air rushes out. Not had that before. Pressure. Isn't that interesting. Must be related to something here. Who knows.

As I predicted months back in an earlier notebook entry, there will be inevitable conflicts between group identities within the rainbow states. It will happen, because reactions against human nature MUST occur to balance the pressure. I didn't manifest that, I just made a correct prediction. The moon star people will be the real issue. I only have this discussion to remind everyone that manifesting isn't something where you control the overall trajectory of social conflicts. You're 100% powerless to change anything with that. You only exist in this time because it's useful for God playing you for purposes of his expansion. This is for his glory, as NG has made clear. The time by which you exist in is determined by the star father, not your conscious desire. Therefore, "whatsoever you desire" is fallible. Period. The law of assumption has a narrow scope of operation, and mostly works through available means of involvement thematically that relates to what's desired. It's not a world shaping reality bending "law". That's insane trash that nobody has ever proven once and never will because that's not how it works or even why it works. It's to "cushion the blows of life" which is a correct explanation that NG used over 11 times in his work.

22/12/25

Ammonium carbonate picks up sulphur.

Collective conflicts are always mediated by Juize. These conflicts are INEVITABLE, as NG says. If that's the case, then the nature of reality by default is suffering to inspire transformation, meaning the lessons thematically speaking that are to be integrated are represented by the conflicts we face. The time we're existing in occurs "for the work to be done in him". Playing all these roles of being born into the role of a victim and such to then gain the stones to stand above the trash is necessary to transcend this lesson, else really you'll wind up in a world where that conflict will be looped since that's a necessary aspect for expansion that needs to be integrated to complete the quintessence of the self.

Here's what I know. Those who take the most pressure when it comes to learning a lesson and THEN INVOLVING IN THE IMPLICATION OF THAT MEANINGFULLY as a DEMONSTRATTION OF FAITH FOR TRUTH, that person will spiritually progress the most. The people who spearhead movements and reveal the darkest truth when nobody else supports you, those are the heroes. The real heroes aren't the ones who gain the most public applaud, they're the ones who are hated by the world the most, until then they're remembered as a hero for being an example of a lesson that the people then looking back failed to accept and learn from. This is what spiritually RS exists for.

Upholding to a higher ideal, as NG says, I believe is a necessary progression to making any of this so called manifestation stuff work for you as well. I'm working on a new level of this that's coded with his work which brings out a far more practical and guided approach to applying NG that will destroy modern LOA at the core.

Here's an interesting view I've not considered that I've stumbled upon that I've not touched on since like 2020. It's that certain people are incapable of transcendence because their innate spiritual nature is polluted from the core. Think about this also. What if the reason why Juize can get way with such disgusting filth is because we have changed internally, at least some have and to some degree. It's decline.

23/12/25

Nearly a mirror date.

Don't have much to add today. I just hate thumb pulling but I have no other way of improving my whacked jaw that's reliable. Been spending more time in nature that's enjoyable, and doing bursts of high impact movement all around and that super high intensely sprinting on the sands of the beach in front of big crowds of people watching my act and bursting through the forests at break neck speed that would break my limits makes me sleep better. Striving for excellence. The point of comparison that inspires, is the heroic past.

When your behavior isn't dependent on external support but on truth of principle that you become an embodied force for, then you are in supply and force changes in those around you by bringing out of them unconsciously repressed innate values that the world around them is designed specifically to repress. The thing is that you're not going to alter the collective trajectory. You will be smitten by God the all powerful and crushed under his mightily fist of fury and order keeping power. His will must be made manifest, and in this cycle of decline we must not seek to alter the trajectory in radical ways until the point in time where the threshold of expansion is within reach. Those who are moved to be eradicated by such acts serve their purpose in being martyrs for that process that galvanize the people around into order and action as a unit. More people working through the pressure to fulfil a common goal of meaningful expansion needs time to ripen, as all processes do. We are likely never going to experience anything getting "better" in our lifetimes. Collectively, today is going to be the most ordered day until your end, if you die. There will be cycles within the larger process of decline that may appear to be reestablishing order but they're blips of a slight self correcting current that's not here to change the overall direction, just to let off pressure on the individual relative to what they've been through. It will not establish true peace and order, but it will manifest this way to establish the illusion for the ignorant masses to cling to hope of normalcy, though the ones who understand this process understand that further decline is inevitable. It's something to be accepted, so that it doesn't cause you to waver through false expectations and meaningless projections.

We're in a time of highly accelerated expansion. The fools who claim that you can alter the play script of God are unbelievably ignorant and need schooling. The period that we've passed has and likely never will return ever in existence of human reality. Thierer is only decline that's inevitable. What does that mean for the individual? It means more or less that trying to make the most of the system will only drag you down into degeneracy that it supports and promotes. Why are most modern women so unbelievably ignorant especially of this? Their nature is to be conditioned, to follow order, and the established order is personal liberty above functional expansion, AKA "everyone is correct in their own right". Relativism, and this is the doctrine of degeneracy which proposes that looking in the mirror isn't necessary and that other people are always the issue for your suffering. It tells us that they must change, and that we're worth more than we objectively are. This is what leads to the degeneracy we find ourselves in and why especially black pill exists as a symptom of this culture. Within the context of this age, it's highly accurate, but overarching, totally misses the point, as I've said. Someone who operates freely as themselves wouldn't care about the validation of women anyway since 70+% of them are HEAVILY conditioned by the insane trash that's there only to create a power vacuum and demoralize any desire for expansion that's meaningful and would result in reward. This scenario exists for that purpose, to simply demoralize you through social conditioning on a massive scale that you are 100% powerless to stop. As stated above, you're not here to stop it but to totally disconnect from playing within the degeneracy at all, and justifications of accepting a degree of this degeneracy of the system come from conditioning and sheer ineptness to see things for what they are. The overstimulated shen which seeks more and more addiction to approval from the fools conditioned by the degeneracy that's normalized only further by feeing into it, these types simply cannot internally distance without a comparison to past culture of excellence and striving for expansion. The lessons to be learned from exploring certain roles in the dysfunctional system are for many necessary for their personal growth though, to some degree or another, and thus we cannot see them or their process as "bad" because it's still ultimately leading towards order, though in a very narrow perspective of impact in the world.

Today now more than ever, questioning the authority what you find pleasure in will become your greatest ally in navigating the times when pleasures that are meaningless are used against us to exploit and manipulate us, by design. This reality for the person exists as a substrate for expansion, and the time you're in is the most challenging of all. Applying RS in this day and age will guarantee the highest order results possible when it comes to mastery of navigation within the system and on the personal expansion level. The one who holds firm to a higher ideal for himself and those around him who are willing to follow the path of denying the trash of this age will receive the highest rewards in the end, instead of buying into the temporary pleasures of this weak and feeble reality that exists to demoralize you from becoming one with that higher ideal, as NG says. The death of the trash needs to happen, to go all the way. Uncompromisingly, to stand for what's correct above what's stimulations and to not give a damn about the seeming consequences. RS only exists today because of this attitude that I cultivated over years, more than a decade now. Metaphysically cutting off the heads of the dysfunctional fools around you is necessary to navigate a world like this. Being on the attack, being in the place to strike and impact meaningful shifts within the process of your expansion reveals the inner state of drive and striving for excellence. Looking to God for your actions, to the highest ideals of the embodiment of your capacity, to master and dominate, to not play by any rules of men but of the alchemy itself, the laws that dictate reality manifesting. These rules aren't assumptions, but an ever expanding view of self and thus how that self is able to involve in meaningful ways in the world to reflect that inner state of living in that higher ideal, the end. The end is always higher order, beyond the conditioning, and to embody the seeds that contain the pathway cascades and to manifest that within reality then we must live by the result of that in our lives, the effects in the world of what that means about us and how we relate to our surroundings. We don't do any of this to change the outside, we see ourselves in the view we desire, and accept that whatever is necessary to be done to get to that point is how the seeds are to unfold thematically and transform us to die to that inner truth fully and without compromise. You therefore become the embodiment of that higher ideal and that will be seen in the world around you as you show up accordingly, and as I stated at the start of this entry, the people around you will be activated through your embodied experience that pushes the limits of what they deem possible and reveal their own limits to be critically seen in ways they'd otherwise not.

This right here is how change on an individual level can cascade out into broader change and thus we become the manifestations of that collective trajectory personally expanding individually as the overarching process plays out. We think it's us, but we are always moved by the thematic procession translated into the sensory physical scenario we find ourselves in that constitutes the pressure that's necessary to feel to drive meaningful expansion.

Immortality has and always will be the goal of God as you. We become so solid in our conviction to God and our higher ideal of self expression and excellence that the external world cannot cause you to be pulled into the degeneracy that it thrives on. You, as someone who has the capacity for living such a divine capacity, do not even have one particle of your being resonate with the trash that wants to pull you into the void of self destruction and dysfunction. You cannot be corrupted by the availability of the trash that's right next to you only an arms reach away, you see it as spiritually devoid filth that is to be rejected. Welcome to the solution to all of the issues LOA has. You do not act on and do not belong to this dysfunction. You're way above it and always have been. The more people you step on in the way towards expansion, the more likely you're on the pathway towards pleasing God. Pleasing God is having faith, faith in your higher ideal. If NG tells us that the only way to please God is to have faith in him, his current that drives us, the inner truth of our capacity for expansion in functional and divinely inspired ways, for the peak expression of human potential, then this would mean the faith we have is in that vision, in the things not seen by the eyes and that have no evidence of the senses but that this ideal that you live by and hold steady to is your guiding light towards pleasing God. Do NOT interpret that to hold faith to imaginal senses, for they all represent nothing but symbolic reflection of thematic currents translated into a form that means something about you. The meaning is what we hold faith in, the implication, that this vision holds for us. Do not get sucked into seeing the imaginal senses as God. The implication of God in your life is what they represent. Reject all symbols of modern dysfunction and restore order for that which represents divine right of power and rulership of all that is good and holy. Holy means to be set apart, to be higher, or in other words, to rule by divine hierarchy. Alchemy is hierarchical, and where equality is viewed as dysfunction of the structure God created reality through. We are not all equal, and never will be. Some a much higher and worth much more than others. There are dysfunctional trash in this world, though being in the highest ideal of your own being, by default, drives out dysfunction from those around you, to some degree or another. When NG talked about seeing other people in higher ideals, it wasn't for them, but for self, as he's clearly said there's representations of ones own lack in others, and to the degree that you can dissolve the influence of those factors through implied experiences then you can mediate those currents to restore order within that reflects on the outside through the new means of involvement you've accepted.

Destruction always precedes expansion. ALWAYS. It's a fundamental reality of alchemy. The elements must be separated and the lower aspects then are taken up into higher order to be purified, which is a pressurization process. Then when purified, those elements can be structured into a higher order arrangement, and thus death of the conditions that bind us into false identifications must precede all meaningful and expanding state shifts. Going all the way is necessary to activate this function, else you stop before the full pressure is felt and full death is experienced. Without the seed dying in the ground the pathway cascades cannot ever unfold to their capacity. Thus why rejecting all forms of implication that symbolically resonate the dysfunctional pathways that bind us into the degeneracy of this modern world, those autosuggestions must be cut out and we must be willing to die to the implication of what that means about us. This is functional alchemy and how NG really taught the law, the way nobody else on earth can correctly explain, because I accept the role of the master of these mechanics fully and without compromise no matter what. Only RS has the full unfiltered truth, regardless of if you're ready for accepting that or not. We must die to our trash fully.

Listen very carefully. Taking a position for or against the downfall of the system, both of them can result in transcendence for the individual depending upon the commitment to that act and what it represents about that person. The full death to the implication is where the power is held. THIS is truly what NG stood for with his "imagination created reality" idea. That's ALL he stood for in fact because in his own words ONLY the implication has the power to please God. The full commitment to your ideology of meaningful expansion, and how the vision that REPRESENTS that movement of God, THAT is where the transformation is held. This is why I said that despite the chaos around us, some who embrace the chaos, the dysfunction, and take it all the way, those people in their own right become transformed through such an extreme act that will result in them dying to the expectations of the opposite. Expansion and the higher ideal for our capacity has always been to push limits and die to conditions that bind us into mediocrity. That is faith, and faith in action is going all the way to the point of death. That is pleasing God. Now his work can make sense practically. This interpretation looks COMPLETELY different to the conventional live in your imaginal senses and compromise to stay in happy go lucky feelings 24/7 that never meaningfully alters our relationship to the world. They apply methods to get something, instead of embodying the thematic currents themselves, as I've said in recent videos, which still goes over the heads of 99% of people who watch it. Assumptions I believe can be interpreted very closely to be the meaning and implication of belief relative to your fixed point of comparison, and thus produces charge phenomena and a pathway towards expansion and death. The pathway cascades, the seed (as a capacity for growth and the vision that represents this) embodies both the means by which manifestation can unfold as well as the manifestation itself. The details of the what are contained within, since the seed holds all the capacities for growth and how that becomes what it contains at the point of death. This is why death is necessary, the spiritual death of the trash that binds us to compromise and holding back expansion of how far we are willing to commit to an idea which leads and influences both your own vision into manifestation and drives the visions in others to conscious awareness and thus the experience of the first step of contrast being mediated through discontent with ones self when comparison is made to the fixed direction of natural striving.

The notebook is the only place I can even discuss this stuff, since the algo will not support these types of videos.

The ultimate "pill" is the "real pill" as I call it. Being real is the hardest pill to swallow. Being willing to reject the world is the hardest thing to do, since seeking approval is what we all strive for because it's simulating, and yet approval from a world full of heavily conditioned fools takes you nowhere close to transformation since the availability for such is the product of chaos itself, Unless you can ride in on that chaos and use it for transformation by pushing the limits of that chaos, then you don't get anywhere. Going all the way no matter the direction leads to expansion that's meaningful.

25/12/25

Got in the mirror date. It's Christmas here. Anointing day, alchemically speaking.

This program has been priority #1 and since I've got pretty much all the quotes from NG arranged in order it's coming together very very well. I don't need to go to the extent I thought I did to make this work. Spending 60 hours recording videos in different modules as I've been doing over time isn't necessary now.

""The fastest way to change your world is to make radical decisions that involve leaving something you find comfortable behind and burn that bridge permanently. These decisions catapult the sense of self off the charts in days if you go all the way. People will say how does this manifest an SP or money? Thematic supply/demand is the answer. What does that mean? What you're looking for changes since your attitude/state you habitually return to and operate from and make decisions out of changes in a meaningful way. You become the supply for what you'd otherwise be looking for others to attain, though implication of what's available to you in life via what that radical change means about you.

I suggest you read that over again if you didn't catch it. If you understand what's above then you can correctly interpret the scriptures that reference having whatever you believe to be true. Belief is an arrangement of the field geometry, meridian system activations that psychotically manifest how we experience states/attitudes of mind as NG puts it. Also an "attitude" and a "reaction" are the same thing in NG vocabulary, and therefore belief can be seen the same way because how you experience charge is how you experience belief. The only way to change belief and charge in MEANINGFUL ways (not just looping thoughts in your mind which DOES NOT manifest as NG himself said)

Implication and meaning is where the power is as NG himself said over and over. This is where charge is "felt" and thus the feeling is the secret, intuitively felt as meaning, contextual sense, implication. Connect the dots. Any time you make a radically different and self valuing decision that flies in the face of what you've been accepting for your life out of compromise then you're suddenly opening up "feeling" and thus the secret. How does this manifest SP and money without even thinking about them which happens to me and many others I work with? Implication through thematic pathway cascades and overlapping states. There's SO MANY SUCCESSES that never were through deliberate imaginal scenes, because I KNOW that they don't have ANY power outside of the implicational impact that they'd have, which can ALL be replicated on the outside, if available mediating experience can be applied that is.

Everything we've been taught about NG is wrong, and even my assumptions about what he taught years back when I first started this were wrong as well and I've had to adjust things to line up with what works and can be proven consistently. Unless this is the attitude we approach the study of the phenomena of manifestation then we will always be blinded by our own confirmation biases and be influenced by dumb takes on things that are easily proven wrong. Rigorous experimental application. extensive testing and ISOLATING VARIABLES is necessary to come to these conclusions.""

16/12/25

So I've got an interesting insight, relating to personal relationship stuff that's showed up over the Christmas period here. Women rely on male supply to feel stable, else they go mad. Why? Remember that yin is fixed, though in capacity is volatile. When there's an overlapping yang current the yin will become moisture, radical moisture. All yin substances in movement become moisture when overlapping a suitable container. EVERY system of metaphysical alchemical doctrine supports this. Period. No debate. Fact. This is also why the solar aspect is used to balance the lunar since the lunar is pulled along at any and all overlapping yang current, every influence. They are almost like blank slates to "impress" onto and shape to the likeness of the yang, which is why women in this world so easily go along with the conditioning since there's no higher order fixed perception to remain stable by unlike the men who are closer to that. It's an AFFINITY function more or less, and if you look at what's going on now you'll see the ones who benefit are the ones who go along for the ride of the shifting tide, namely younger women benefiting from everything and not needing any self inquiry at all. This is probably why most clients that are younger are guys, since they face the most issues. No surprise.

What you will find is that the base nature of the yin is fixed, not volatile, though as always since we operate within overlaps and never really in a vacuum This is what advanced gazing does alchemically within us. Advanced gazing is balancing to these currents, unlike any other form of gazing. It's a self correcting function that moves the yin in response to the yang, the solar driving the illumination of the lunar through the subconscious guidance of earth that's then mediated by higher genius. It's a hierarchy. The yin is always the lowest, the unconscious. The unconscious REQUIRES the conscious mind to overlap to have ANY useful power, else it runs the show. This is really what conditioning is, it's our own inner feminine nature that's gotten out of control and those unresolved conflicts show up. Now the alchemist has said the yang experiences this conflict at one point I recall, so the yang is what is seen on the outside to be the issue, the conscious thinking mind expressing these currents because it swims in the female, literally. The solar aspect NEEDS to be more powerful than the lunar in order to sublimate lower yin to refine the contents of the storehouse that then in response drives the solar male conscious aspect.

So this applies physically too.

28/12/25

I've never seen any meaningful change in the outer world happen without some limit being pushed forward first.

29/12/25

"So, that peculiar seed that I have just planted for a friend or for myself . . how long it is going to take, I don’t know, but I must actually believe it. And when I believe it, I drop it. A seed must fall into the ground and rot if it is to be made alive. I cannot hold it in my mind’s eye; if I take it and do not drop it, then it remains just a seed. I must drop it into the earth and let it rot. And when it rots, it means that I have dropped it from my mind. I’ve done it. That’s all I can do. And then, in its own wonderful appointed hour it will ripen." - the potters house unknown date

He tells us that we must forget about it. "drop it" from the mind. Drop the seed in this case, into the ground as the analogy, seems to be him saying to "drop" it from the mind or forget. What does this mean? I'm going to say it's meaning that you're mediating pressure to which desire is no longer felt, meaning pressure that pulls your attention into importance has been moved meaningfully. How else could you forget about it? This in a sense is about you experiencing something meaningful that implies the fulfilment of being the person that this seed means you now have/are. When you're "done" then it can be dropped. That's why I will argue that this whole thing about forgetting isn't really a possibility if need is present and need is a pressure to appease, a hunger to satiate, dissatisfaction.

"So here tonight, if you know anyone in your world who desires…and it comes within your code of decency…if they want you to kill someone, you don’t do it! If they want you to rob a bank, don’t do it! It doesn’t come within your code of decency. But no matter what they want, it goes way beyond their capacity at the moment, judging from appearances, to realize it, you grant it. You simply put on their little form, and simply move towards the fulfillment of what they want, feeling all the time that you, as the little one called John, called Mary, called by any name, that you have it. And feel the emotion of success, the emotion that would accompany that claim. And then drop it, and return to your former state called by your present name. You’ve done it!" - creative moments 1965

"After smothering yourself in feeling, you have sent it on its way and cannot take it back, for prayer is nothing more than the subjective appropriation of an objective hope. Imagine by giving objective reality to your hope. Hair is the most objective thing on a man. Bring your hope so close that you can feel what it would be like if it were objective to you.

Clothe yourself in that feeling . . and you have clothed yourself in the reality of an Esau. The world will not immediately reflect your feeling, but you have set your desire in motion and cannot take it back. You have given a subjective state your blessing by giving it objective reality. Now it must fulfill its destiny so that you will be blessed in all that you are doing.

If you don’t give your subjective hope objective reality, you can’t be blessed in its fulfillment. You must clothe yourself in the feeling that your wish is fulfilled. Jacob is your desire, waiting to be clothed in the feeling of external reality. Catch the feeling, and you have clothed Jacob with the external reality of Esau. Now deceive yourself into believing that your desire is externally real, and give it your blessing by subjectively appropriating your objective hope. Who is the blind Isaac? You are, for you cannot see what you are asking for in your outer world. It’s a hope and you are blind to it. But when you clothe yourself in the feeling of its fulfillment, you are eating the feeling of satisfaction. Feast upon this feeling morning, noon, and night, and in a way you do not know your desire will become an objective reality in your world.

In this story we see the importance of feeling. Isaac asked Jacob to come close and kiss him. The word translated “kiss” means, “to set on fire; to burn; to touch.” That’s an emotion, an intense feeling. Reality is felt through the sense of touch. Feeling is touch. Tasting is touch. Scripture tells us he tasted death for all of us. How do you taste death? By experiencing it. Jesus tasted death by dying in all, that all may know who he is.

Now I urge you to put his teaching into practice. He taught you to simply appropriate a subjective state which is your objective hope, and know it must externalize itself in your world. Do that and it will. Ask in faith, without a doubt, for those who doubt are like the wave of the sea that is driven and tossed by the wind. They are double-minded, for they know what they are while desiring to be something else. You must be single-minded by dropping what you believe you are and assuming that you are already what you desire to be, for you cannot desire something you already possess. Look into the wonderful law of liberty" - feel deeply 1969

We should know how to interpret this. He's talking about charge phenomena. When you ask yourself the question "what would it feel like if" and you immerse yourself into the reality of that contextual experience being real for you right now thinking FROM it then you'll target the pathway cascade that holds the overlap to implied conditions if any are present and thus you'll feel them in response as discomfort of some form. If you have no discomfort then you're feeling comfortable towards it and that will naturally come through you. Naturalness stems from charge that's stable.

Kiss and setting on fire obviously means to experience activation. Here he also talks about being single mindedness being about "dropping" what you believe you are and assuming you're who you want to be now. Then he says you cannot desire (feel pressure) for something you already have meaningfully experienced and satisfied. Makes total sense, though to get there obviously it takes us cutting through the trash that says we can't, else we'd be there already. "They are double-minded, for they know what they are while desiring to be something else." This is what I said about "trying to fit what you want into who you are now" which causes signs and all that stuff. Meaningless experiences that relate.

"At the present moment someone is treading the wine press of hate, and . . unrestrained . . the thought is sent on its wings of feeling. Perhaps sitting in a dungeon this night, someone is treading the wine press of war, and some little boy out in the field catches the idea and wanting to be a hero dreams of becoming a great general, commanding the destruction of the world. He is dreaming and you can’t stop his dream. So you are not warring against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers and spiritual wickedness in heavenly places, and heaven is within. In the inside of your mind these abominable, loathsome beings are carved. They are unseen forces impinging upon you morning, noon, and night.

But oh, what a thrill to get a letter of this nature! Her building is finished. She now knows that she only sends! She gave the order, saw herself as another, receiving, but when the message must be retold she once more became the teller. And when it is to be experienced, she will be the one who experiences it. So God only acts and is in existing beings or men, for God is playing all the parts.

In the end everyone brings his living temple to the house of God. Ephesians tells us how the structure is joined together and how the holy temple grows in the Spirit. It’s a spiritual temple, not one in this world. Scripture calls the church “the body of Christ”, but the word translated “church” is “communion of the assemblage of the redeemed.” It’s the assemblage of those whose building is finished. Playing the part of the receiver, we are the one being who is the builder. Finding Caleb, you (as Joshua, who is Jesus) are led into the Promised Land, as scripture is fulfilled. Having shone like the sun in order to lead you in, Caleb disappears leaving Jesus only. And who is Jesus? Your own wonderful human imagination!"

"Paul, in his letter to the Romans, divided the tenses, saying: “If we have been united with him in a death like his, we shall certainly be united with him in a resurrection like his.” The crucifixion is past. “He chose us in him before the foundation of the world.” If this is true, then the universal Christ gave us himself, for did he not say: “No man takes my life, I lay it down myself. I have the power to lay it down and the power to lift it up again.” And we are laid down with him, because he chose us in him before the foundation of the world. So, if you are united with him in a death like his, you will certainly be united with him in a resurrection like his. I know this is true, for he was resurrected in me, confirming the story of scripture. This is how the structure is enhanced and grows in God. And when the final curtain comes down and the temple is perfect, you will be God the Father and I will be God the Father, yet none of us will lose our identity!" - building your temple 1967

"He looks upon the whole vast world, with all that is in it and all the combinations . . everything as part of the eternal structure of the universe. What he means by “creation” is that here this structure is animated by spirit entering the body. I enter “Hamlet,” and Hamlet becomes, now, not just a costume hanging in a play, but he becomes a living, animated being. So, first we animate the body, but that is not the ultimate of creation. I then must become, not only a living being, I must become a life-giving spirit. That is when we awake from the dream of life where we only dream of the journey, and we are life-giving spirits . . one with God the Father." - ore-existence 1969

Structure. Here's structure seemingly meaning form, form by which activation can embody. What is the activation? Feeling. Movement of current. That's why he said not all thoughts create. Structure that's dead means nothing, structure that implies activation and expansion in response moves current by illuminating those pathways.

"Let us examine this thought. In his 2nd letter to the Corinthians Paul says: “We walk by faith and not by sight.” When we walk by sight, we know our way by objects that the eye sees. But Paul tells us to order our life by objects seen only in the imagination. In other words, when you know where you want to go and what you want to be, you are told not to rearrange your physical structure, but to walk by faith, viewing only the rearranged structure of your mind. And if you will remain faithful to that state of consciousness, what is seen only in your imagination will objectify itself in your world." - walk by faith 1967

"The law, to be effective, needs feeling with form. Build a structure that would imply your desire is already fulfilled, and enter its form with feeling. You do not have to be concerned about influencing others, as they are not the cause . . your imaginal act is! Those who have a billion dollars are not causing your world. You and you alone are doing it, as your imaginal acts influence people. Everyone is yourself pushed out, so when you imagine, you are influencing yourself!" - what are you doing 1967

Well that right there he says we need feeling with form. Just like I said above. So structure is form, and feeling is activation, the reality of experience, that implies something about us. How else could you feel something without implication on the fixed perspective on self, else desire cannot be satisfied? Notice he never said that structure in itself has power, he says that it needs activation, feeling, implication to be experienced that implies fulfilment. Guess what, contextual sense is in itself a form as well, as I've proven endless times. You don't need imaginal sensory depth to make any of this work, since especially those who have aphantasia. All you need is "contextual sense", which is separate from imaginal senses, though comes under imaginal senses in principle because it's non physical experience still. It's a subjective experience and thus can activate the so called law.

"Well, this morning, in my usual ventures in the mind, here I found Abdullah. Ab is gone from this world now. Here stands before me—and Ab was my height, I’m 5’11”—Abdullah stands before me a man not over fifty years old, about 6’5”, in a Caucasian body. And here is Abdullah before me, no loss of identity, no change of identity, but this majestic figure, and he and I were discussing this theme of tonight. Then he showed me a little instrument with a tape, and then he said, “Now as you know, Neville, it only echoes; that’s all that it can do. That’s the world, the world is only mechanism, it’s just mechanical. The whole vast world, the eternal structure of God’s eternal world, all these garments they’re just as mechanical as that. And now, you’re not going to speak into it, you’re only going to hear, you’re going to listen, and what you listen to will play back there. What you listen to and hear from within you, as you actually hear it you’ll play it back there.” I thought of this party, that party, that party, and whatever I thought of and the very things I heard as I thought of it, and then he played it back coming from that tape. Not a word voiced from my vocal chords, just inwardly imagining that I am hearing the sound of a certain friend’s voice, and here comes this mechanical echo playing back." - Who are the condemned 1964

That's how he viewed reality it seemed. Mechanical. Not entirely incorrect really.

"You’ll have the power, the most fantastic power in the world. Nothing in this world…you speak of nuclear energy…there’s nothing comparable to the power that is given you. Here you come into a room like this, you could take a bomb and blow everyone up and destroy it. You think you could. You could destroy it, but that moment prior to the moment of destruction remains forever, so you can’t really destroy more than the instant that you think you did, and that instant remains in time. But with this power of which I speak, you come into this room, and you could turn off from within yourself that which allows everyone to be aware of being alive. And turning it off, they will believe themselves no…as a lady present knows from being turned off…that they are nothing, but absolutely nothing. That there’s nothing, they are nothing. And then you turn it on and then wherever you stopped it, they simply pick it up at that moment in time, and they go on, and they become someone again. So you know the power that you can really exert, you can turn off. You can not only turn it off, may I tell you, I’ve done it. Not on this level, I have done it. You turn it off and then you rearrange the structure of the intentions of those that you turned off. When you turn it on again they have not the intention they had when you turned it off, and they move in an entirely different direction." - call the next witness 1964

So here he's talking about more structure. He says that everything here is dead, truly dead, it has nothing but is a moment of time that's experienced by the garment. Well at the highest level you could see it like that I could say but from our awareness here that's not the case. If you embody activating current itself, the father, the supply, then you'll be separate from all the structure of the world and revoke all of its life, internally that is. Notice however that he said it didn't happen "on this level". I believe this was the story when he was near some train station or something and time froze and he saw it all as dead and that in that space of silent stillness then you could go in and alter the intentions of others to be as you'd like in an instant and they'd change from that point forward.

"If you have a goal, although it is unseen, it already exists. Your normal mortal eye cannot see it, but by rearranging the structure of your mind, you can see it clearly. If, as the days follow one another, you remain loyal to this unseen reality, and your goal is reached, you will have discovered the mystery of creation." - creation, faith 1968

Perhaps another has injured you or caused you grief. It doesn’t matter what has been done, when you know this law you can forgive anyone by rearranging the structure of your mind and set him free by imagining it never happened!" - creation, faith 1968

"If you want to test God, you may. Your immortal eyes and ears need not be open to test your creative power. Simply assume you are the one you want to be. Remain faithful to your assumption and, although everything denies it, you will become it. It does not matter who you are or what the world thinks of you; anything is possible to the “I” of imagination. " - enter the dream 1969

Well that's interesting. Your immortal eyes and ears need not be open to test it. Immortal eyes and ears. There seems to be here a condition on their opening huh. He's saying this under the context of the completion of the work it seems. He's said though that working the law becomes "easier" at the end, though he's also said "not until the end" as well referencing making the so called law work.

"This doesn’t mean that, just because you heard my vision you are going to enjoy wealth; you must apply what you heard, and remember when. If you would say: “I remember when I couldn’t afford to spend $400 a month for rent,” you are implying you can well afford it now. The words: “I remember when it was a struggle to live on my monthly income,” implies you have transcended that limitation. You can put yourself into any state by remembering when. You can remember when your friend expressed her desire to be married. By remembering when she was single, you are persuading yourself that your friend is no longer in that state, as you have moved her from one state into another.

When I say all things exist in the human imagination, I mean infinite states; for everything possible for you to experience now, exists in you as a state of which you are its operant power. Only you can make a state become alive. You must enter a state and animate it in order for it to out picture itself in your world. You may then go back to sleep and think the objective fact is more real than its subjective state into which you have entered; but may I tell you: all states exist in the imagination. When a state is entered subjectively, it becomes objective in your vegetative world, where it will wax and wane and disappear; but its eternal form will remain forever and can be reanimated and brought back into being through the seed of contemplative thought. So I tell you: the most creative thing in you is to enter a state, and believe it into being.

Now, causation is the assemblage of mental states, which occurring creates that which the assemblage implies. Let us say that I have two friends who would empathize with me (not sympathize) if they heard my good news. I put them together and listen (all in my imagination) as they talk about me and what has happened in my life. Being true friends, I hear their words of joy and see their happiness reflected on their faces. Then I allow myself to become visible to them and feel their handshake and embrace as I accept their congratulations as a fact. Now I have assembled a mental state, which occurring, created that which the assemblage implied; therefore I AM its cause. As I walk, firmly believing in the reality of what I have done, and that imaginal act becomes a fact, I may question myself as it how it came about. Then, remembering my imaginal act I would say: “I did it.” If I did it, then did not God do it? Yes, because God and I are one “I AM”. Are you going to continue to believe there is another on the outside; or are you going to believe the great confession of faith, which I would urge you to accept? It’s the great Sh’ma: “Hear O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is One.” If the Lord is one he can’t be two; therefore, if his name is I AM and you say “I AM,” you must be one with the Lord who brought the world into being.

Listen to these words: “By faith we understand that the world was created by the word of God, so that things that are seen were made out of things which do not appear.” Here we see that the word of God is an imaginal activity, which . . joined by faith . . created the world. And faith is nothing more than the subjective appropriation of an objective hope. Now, when you discuss your desire with me, you cannot see my imaginal act relative to you. If you tell me you need a job and I accept that thought, when I think of you I remember your need. But if I changed your words and heard you tell me you loved your job, I could remember when you needed one; for now my memory bank contains the fact that you have a job you like very much. And when we meet again you tell me that you have it, you are only bringing confirmation of my imaginal, creative act.

Now, if imagination works this way, and it proves itself in the testing time and time again, what does it matter what the world thinks? It costs you nothing to try it, and what a change in life it will produce for you. Try it, for you will prove it in performance." - believe it in 1969

So here we have NG telling us that causation is the ASSEMBLAGE of mental states, meaning their overlap, actually. Assemblage means basically collection into a single point, assembling of components. He's mentioned this before in the structure being subjective quote as well I can't find but I've got it in the earlier pages multiple times.

"Now, John Mills defines causation as the assemblage of phenomena, which occurring, some other phenomena commence to appear in the world. In other words, causation is the assemblage of an imaginal state implying the fulfillment of desire, which feeling will activate and produce in the world. And H. G. Wells put it this way: “Throughout the ages, life is nothing more than a continuing solution to a continuous synthetic problem,” How many times have you said to yourself: if I only had x-number of dollars I could live comfortably, then inflation appears and you are forced to use your creative power to construct an imaginal solution to your new problem." - Your maker 1969

In this one it's another example of implication being the "assemblage" being the pathway cascades in the field geometry representing this." - unknown source but I've got it referenced in another page

There's one on that. So this imaginal solution is representative, implication on releasing pressure, hunger, movement of current. How else do you mediate pressure if the experience of contextual reality doesn't hold meaning/importance to some degree? You can't. So imaginal/inner responses assembling together in overlap which holds implication causes manifestation.

"In other words, causation is the assemblage of an imaginal state implying the fulfillment of desire, which feeling will activate and produce in the world."

That right there is in fact a very accurate statement if decoded properly. Man who knew NG had this depth. All those words I threw at this guy totally ignorant of the depth here, but I mean who wouldn't say that given that it was only once I went through ALL 345 lectures he made AGAIN with this search tool I made that things came together exponentially faster. The implication has the power, not directly in terms of sensory details since we know they don't replicate as exactly as is imagined but that the overarching implication of what that represents and means will, that we can all prove clearly especially with signs. The phenomena of signs showing up proves this irrefutably in fact and makes it obvious that sensory detail or direct wording means nothing in essence without that implication holding importance to move current. That is the assemblage. The assembling of imaginal states (reactions/seeds that imply expectation based on baseline charge levels of various thematic currents) which then the response of that sensory detail will bring about the experience externally. It will drive you and others to play their roles based on how you feel. He said feeling ACTIVATES the state, a response, motor response he said. Sensory details are all dead, though the response to it activates it which your response will if implying the death of another state cause that focused state to take on life. This is movement of shen we could say, which has connection to the kidney heart axis as I've always said. Kidney Jing being the root pattern and the shen being the activation of conscious experience we have. The overlap of fire and water.

Do notice that he talks about responses to news paper articles or radio reports often when it comes to examples of unconscious activations of states. It's the reactions that imply something about us, these are what activate states. I don't know how anyone could prove otherwise I've literally gone over every example of him saying this and it's consistent with doctrine. This is how it must work. Without the implied response that means something about you, be it lack or comfort or whatever in between, that response will determine your relationship to it, AKA the sense of self, AKA the original formula of concept x feeling/sense of self = manifestation of old RS. Contextual sense I said back then was HOW you work that mechanism, which was my term for implication, or intuitive association. This all works, though this language that I've been using lately is more clear for more people. I still say that concept is a good term, since we should always get away from this sensory detail idea as the details often aren't important, though IF certain details can elicit a response from your currents then that detail SHOULD be focused on as a means of moving current over an overarching concept targeted. That's just narrowing out the concept more or less than anything at that level.

We also know this doctrine to be true since NG and scripture both talk about death a lot, implying death of limitations of this world that bind us into conditioning out vision for the expectations of others. Stones/facts of life as NG says.

"So we are told, go into the world and tell the story. Tell it to every being in the world…how they’re really living in a world made up only of their beliefs; that “All that I behold, though it appears without, it is within, in my Imagination, of which this world of mortality is but a shadow.” The whole vast world is myself pushed out, myself objectified. What self? The self made up of all of my beliefs—I believe I was this, that and the other. So today, may I tell you, take everyone in this world that you know, costs you nothing and, may I tell you, you don’t need to be graduated from any institution in this world to practice this art. You don’t need a degree. You don’t need any permission of anyone to say you are this, that or the other. You can do it just as you are here. You need no one’s consent to do it, because you’re doing it anyway. You’re walking the earth just a compulsive being made up of all the things that you believe, and then you out picture them in this world." - the art of dying 1965

All the things you believe would represent the field geometry and currents in their arrangement, and thus altering that arrangement of current determines what you believe, what you hold important and true for you since the meaning on that determines association relative to the fixed Jing or Christ child pattern.

"In the oldest of our gospels, which is Mark, the first words put into the mouth of that central fi gure, “The time is fulfi lled, and the kingdom of God is at hand; repent, and believe the gospel” (Mark 1:15). Repent! We are called upon to repent, and to repent means “a radical change of attitude towards life”; a radical change towards anything in this world, but radical right down to the root. So I meet someone in this world and they tell me their story. Having heard their story, they’ve left their impression on me because I trust them, I believe them. Having heard exactly what is taking place in their life, if it isn’t pleasant they’ve left me with some other aspect of my own being, for they’ve given me another impression. Every impression adds to my being. Every belief is my being. I am the sum total of all that I believe. Well now as I leave them and they go their way and I go my way, it is entirely up to me. not to them, to me, to change my being and bring it back into another state. For we are told in the 51st Psalm, “Against thee, thee only, have I sinned, O Lord”…I can’t sin against anyone but myself. Who took that impression? I did. Well, what is his name?—I AM—well, I am believing that. “Against thee, thee only, have I sinned, O Lord; therefore thy judgment was just.” Everything you do to me thereafter is just. I can’t complain, for I’ve only sinned against God, and God is I AM…because I took the impression. I saw it and seeing it, I believed it, and believing it, it’s part of my world now. I must live with it. So from thereon I either live with it and bear the fruit of that impression, or I change it. I change it by becoming another person.

So repentance in a lovely way means “to become another person.” Because that was my being that’s the being that I am. Become another person: I don’t see him that way, I don’t see her that way, I change it in my mind’s eye; and changing it, I persuade myself of the reality of that imaginal act. I represent the individual to myself as what I would like him to be, and seeing him in that light I believe in the reality of that imaginal act. Then time proves that it’s true…she or he conformed to this imaginal act of mine. If that is true, I keep my body balanced as it were. And I am being called by my Father back into that fall from the fragmented state."

Impression is being in it, reacting to it, experiencing the meaning of that to me. Repeatedly doing this in persistence moves current until satisfaction.

30/12/25

Creating satisfying feedback cycles is good.

Order of importance.

God. Vision. Opportunities.

That's the order of importance. God is always why we make decisions, for expansion purposes. Then our vision, which God moves through, and opportunities that overlap are the next stage. You will begin with opportunities for your vision that serves God. God is the overarching cause, and should be referenced as the integrated process which contains the vision and opportunities within it. Knowing that God moves through you in all ways is how you sink charge consistently. The wider awareness, that faith in that capacity, and that even seeming bad things that stem from making meaningful decisions are always there for your benefit is incredibly empowering. Any time you move things forward meaningfully then you expand. If you don't know what you want or where to go and you're lost and forgotten then always start with the foundation of vitality cultivation. Nourish your form, train hard, expand limits in the ways that you have available if no other obvious path is open and aware for you. This will provide supply of root pressure to make those levels conscious and ripen the opportunities. Those who grasp these mechanics and have applied it will know this. The root vitality matters.

So I've just had a 90 day client message saying he feels lost and doesn't know where to go, despite explaining what to do when this comes up multiple times. Why do they forget and not see it? It's simple. They lack expanding current to WANT to involve in meaningful experiences that are satisfying and so wallow around in the trash because its comfortable and not difficult. It's available to stay in the box, though I can bet if I could inject this guy with kidney yang and heart qi and maybe some spleen qi then he'd almost certainly WANT to work on unfolding the vision that we outlined. Whenever you're in that aimless state it's almost always because you're simply lacking in root pressure. Root pressure MUST be available for expansion to occur and that's nutritionally based from a biochemical perspective. This is just the fact, it's not NECESSARY to make those decisions but I will say that it will make you WANT to where you're not having to draw on every last drop of the bottom of the barrel to get into satisfying flow. I will say the moment these types also get sunlight and fresh air it can move the qi stagnations that might contribute. Been there too many times to count, probably 80+% of the time when I felt like that and just throw myself outside for a walk or drive somewhere in the hills I get revived and all that vision comes online with passion to expand. That's why you're unable and or unwilling to play the part, and why the conditions seem so big.

Keep in mind that when you're operating optimally then the conditions can seem much smaller even without taking tonics. Often it's simply stagnation of qi, and this is what most of the imaginal scene stuff can actually open up, to move qi, IF you do it right that is. NG is getting you to move current by imagining the death of your conditioned self. This is necessary in most cases, myself included often as well. We all face qi stagnation to some degree, and screen time makes qi stagnate like nothing else. Sitting around looking at screens CAUSES DIRECT qi stagnation, because liver qi is GOING to stagnate if you're in that position consistently every day and you will feel that stuck sluggish sensation which opens up the moment you begin to move again. The eyes connect to liver meridian directly, and when you're facing liver qi stagnation which "blocks" the vision from being available to you, even if it's "on the top of your tongue" and just needs that last push, getting into dynamic movement of some form almost always will open this up, and if it's not the same day then you'll wake up with drive the next day. That I can assure you.

So much of what keeps people stuck in the box at baseline levels is just qi stagnation and yang depletion. It's really that simple in most cases. So this is the foundation that I talk about. When your qi is online the way it should be then you'll notice opportunities more, you'll have a fixation on the vision, you'll literally HAVE MORE OF GOD IN SUPPLY, that starlight. It will be available FOR INTEGRATION. This is important. It doesn't mean that just because you've got good qi movement that you've integrated it, that needs integration through full thematic circulation. This means that the current needs to move in the ways that are necessary to unfold the Jing via natural striving, and by facing pressures that result in satisfaction. So qi that's available can be put to work and applied to be then integrated and establish a more expanded baseline. You need available current to establish that more expanded baseline, since it IS the supply of pressure to expand, and when that pressure is mediated properly then you expand at baseline through cutting through the trash and dying to the old self, rearranging the structure of the field geometry. Reference the NG quotes from the last entry and you'll see that.

So simply put, when you expand it's because you've had the Jing manifest in the substantive format (steam colour if you've read older entries and know those mechanics) because God necessitates you to play the role you're facing pressure to play "for the work yet to be done in him". This is the promise unfolding, as NG puts it, immortality, and NG said the only way to "speed it up" is repentance, which we know is metaphysical death. You can ONLY expand through death. Death is necessary to be refined, because your elements get separated, purified (put under pressure and processed representing cuttings through conditions to accept natural striving and vision) and then put back together again (integration phase and satisfaction) and this represents the full thematic cycle I talked about before where the currents take form in the necessary ways to move forward the Jing unfolding into the template that was set before you existed. This is all Jing unfolding, though Jing manifests AS kidney yang and yin, mostly as yang though that's consciously felt. You will then have that upward and expanding current manifest as the warmth of the heart, the spleen will warm, and the liver qi will be motivated and that creative vision will come online. If this creative vision is felt as stimulation (functional pressure) then you'll WANT to involve in putting yourself through the alchemical transformation process under pressure. This will be a desire, a drive to WANT to expand and be satisfied. The satisfaction is the relief of that pressure and the experience itself will thematically imply various currents to move to illuminate necessary roots in the Jing to accept more of your innate self. This is what's happening as the promise unfolds, the innate nature becomes conscious as implication through experience and when limits are expanded beyond what's accepted by the world (the stones or facts of life in NG terms) then you'll be operating repentance mechanically. Repentance and overlapping states are the same thing, and the alchemist confirmed this to me 2 weeks ago when I was going over this doctrine.

It's obvious and clear. Repentance is how NG said we can speed it up, and he also said there's LEVELS of repentance, just as there's levels of intensity, and levels of consciousness. All of this is variable nature based on the degree we've unfolded a capacity that's within us, a seed, a pattern. These are all terms NG used, and it makes sense when decoded correctly. So manifesting the change in the world, it all comes from this mechanism being worked. Any change in state is a change in pressure, since the response you have to a stimulus of sensory structure will illuminate the thematic currents in the channels that will have relationship to how the Jing has pressure to unfold and that fixed point of comparison within you is what that sensory impression implies and means about you, the degree of importance. This is the mechanics of state coherency as I use to call it, how you'll have stable currents move in the meridian systems and in response your psychology will reflect this as well as the works you perform in the world through the corporeal being. This whole free will thing is all current phenomena, because your psychology and biology is all dependent on the concentration and ratios of various thematic currents in the meridian systems. There's no way around this, your mind doesn't overpower these things, it moves the currents because it's by nature a phase conjugate self recursive circuit that attracts like magnets all necessary forms of stimulus to illuminate the Jing into motivation and awareness which initiates transformation. Because you exist you are unable to stop expanding. You have ZERO free will to stop that, and this is the foundational mechanism of your very existence. Expansion to become more of God, to integrate all the capacities in the pattern of the Christ child seed within until that pattern is fully unfolded. This is in fact what NG taught, as I've proven, against what I use to say.

So with all of this clear, if operating the so called law depends on the promise to be moving along the way then it means that expansion works the law, not the other way around. The law as it works where people claim you manifest everything including negative beliefs is true, but not in the way they interpret it. The things you "manifest" under that context are ALWAYS to illuminate the trash, which I've outlined above as the core function of your existence. You can't turn it off because it will always put you under pressure until you learn the lesson, thus you have no free will to avoid the promise because the pattern within you has its own appointed hour, when it ripens, and when it is ripe it will come through you and you have ZERO free will to stop that. It's all God the father as your source providing all of this movement of greater process. No avoiding this principle of transcendental activity through you. So the law doesn't bypass this, since you could say that if you don't believe in the promise then you can use the law to avoid this responsibility, but that's incorrect, therefore the childish interpretation of whatsoever you desire is dead and refuted. You in principle have that available, but WILL it? No. It won't be because your expansion is in a fixed direction of pressure applied thematically as the Christ seed unfolds. Remember that NG did speak about the lessons we need to learn and that our death and birth conditions are determined by the father, greater process as the source of emanation. He said that our being here is the emanation of God, the corporeal being. There's no way to avoid this process. We might as well then accept it and own the roles that we're being moved to accept since those roles in themselves will be expanding to some degree or another to accept, even if they're not the perfect vision but still will provide transcendental value.

I also want to speak on this point, since I know the alchemist for example if he read this wouldn't agree fully. I need to frame all of this under this perspective. All of this is to become more aware of who you are, as the capacity of the father. This is really what NG was speaking about relating to awakening as God, and this insight or gnosis cannot be comprehended by someone who's of lower consciousness, it's impossible. You must have access to the substances to have the awareness and width to see those things for what they are. We are doing this work to gradually see in ourselves the innate capacity become conscious as who we are. We are doing all of this to recognize self to be not self but the supply above it all, and the cause of the corporeal self. The more you overlap this awareness the more the promise has progressed, and the point of conjugation is when you've attained enough awareness for your awakening to be complete. That's the "explosion" in the skull as NG says. It's that you've raised enough of the dragon to overlap the higher order states and the effects of that is wider awareness. So in all of that work you do in the world to transform, you are in effect gradually seeing self as beyond the limits, and this overlap gradually opens up the awareness that you're beyond all of this. That awareness that's deeply buried as a capacity in the pattern is what holds the power, and when you cut through conditions you are getting more overlap with the dragon, the current of God the father, the starlight of higher order illumination which is the only force which is expansive in reality. Since it's all God then it must all be an emanation of the one source. Repentance is turning the light, you're allowing yourself to look at God through seeing beyond the limits of this world because that view of transcendence over the facts of the limits of the senses can ONLY be supplied by God, to some degree or another. Gazing taps you closer into this supply at baseline if consistently applied and especially advanced gazing since you're directly overlapping higher order states when you do it bit by bit. This is necessary to see self as God as a matter of ripeness. You cannot just "do" that, and see self as God, it must be gradually unfolded and experienced for real. This is also not excessive activation of the shen that people think is the feeling of being as God, which is just mania when the shen is uplifted excessively.

This is why RS is correct in the application. People think that doing this work isn't "manifesting" and yet nobody who says that can reliably prove anything in their lives relating to "making" it happen for them. Nobody can "do" manifestation. You cannot make it happen with anything other than an acceptance of more of self, which is working the principle of illumination as stated above. They're the same thing, they're not different, and yet people will continue to cling to this insane idea that you can bypass this process and go beyond anything here with your imaginal senses or whatever because of all the massive empty promises that have ruled the LOA space for years now. People will only gravitate to this false expansion work because it's stimulating and keeps them in pseudo satisfaction, unlike the real deal which is facing pressure. This has been known for thousands of years. This isn't new, I've simply connected all these systems and packaged this all together in a way that nobody else has done, though the depths of this work isn't popular or profitable since it's hardcore and mercilessly challenging. The fury of God is uncompromising. Odin in Norse mythos is said to be the most furious of all, and that's the passionate drive for expansion, Odin being the Father of Norse mythos. Odin hung himself on the world tree with all the 9 worlds of reality. The overlaps are obvious. The 9 is a container of the 8 gates which in itself is a container of the 7 Olympian archetypes which hold the core principle powers that manifest through everything in reality. The 7 eyes of God, which NG made a lecture on I believe references this directly as well, which obviously nobody in LOA has any idea how to decode properly. When you properly decode this work it's obvious about what it entails.

I will have to speak about imaginal acts having power on cam, not because it's true but because you dear viewer fail to even see beyond your own conditioning. This is simply a stepping stone to correct application, warming you up and tricking you as NG did into gradual self acceptance. He only taught that to play games with you, because it's all just a ritual to get you into an experience that puts you under pressure to accept more of yourself and thus gradually illuminate God in yourself as the pattern unfolds. That's all it's for, it's not above or different from anything else. So this is why I have no option but to preach half truth to even have a chance of getting the masses on board with this deeper doctrine by warming them up. Your ignorance is the issue. You are the narrow one here, and I have to play games to gradually open that up. Deep down I really don't care about this work but I have no option it seems if I'm going to end up getting to the multi million range. I know that this work is and will always be available and I will have another secret channel where I preach this without filter and it will be out there in the wild. So I will continue to speak these facts since it comes through me but I will also on the LDJ channel warm people up to get deeper into this and accepting the reality of how things work since they can't have too much heat applied at once. My videos that go hard always lose subs and my clients dry up in response. I suffer materially from those videos, and it sucks, though it's a necessary step to take in unfolding the full expanse of RS in public eye.

When your girl tries to control you, you withdraw care for her. You DO NOT try and validate her trash. EVER or she'll lose respect as you being the rock solid pillar of stone you are that she needs to stand on. She will be volatile and you must stand firm. Women will ALWAYS do this, because they need supply and control over the yang. When you withdraw whenever she's trying to be a leech on your vitality you simply go nope. This isn't something to be parasitic about, but you'll know when she's doing it if you're aware of your vision for your life and God and how you feel about these things and the implications of what her demeanor means about you in trying to go after your supply. I've gotten to the point now where I can pretty confidently say that my girl doesn't even try anymore as she use to in playing that role. I was as most guys are in the start blind as to these advanced and attempts to break down and get all emotionally volatile to attempt to drive contextual experience and pull out of you your weaknesses in conforming to expectations. If you know what you want and you fixate on that and she tries to put up walls of control around you access to that then you cut out any implications that she has to influence your decisions. You know what I learned? They will always cave if you don't cave. They will reflect on what happened and make different decisions if you get real with what's up. They don't determine the flow of current, you do, and she rides in on that. That's how it always should be, despite what this world tells us about equality and trash. We're vastly more aware than the social conditioning over how to handle relationship stuff. The guys who aren't experienced with this and who get caught in that will have their life sucked out but I can assure you that when you're at baseline more solid than she is then she will be the one who loses from making such parasitic attacks. She will deplete her own vitality and you'll be the one who remains on top and she won't be able to help but to come back. This goes WAY beyond assumptions and stuff.

I can assure you with 100% certainty that this mechanism of extension and retraction being the give and take of vitality supply is what drives success in relationships. Long term relationships that is. The virility matters to get in the door, but as I've said before just getting attraction is literally like 10% of the matter when it comes to long term attraction because you can LOOK juiced up but if internally you're still depleted and lacking deeply then good luck maintaining stability. I've said before that your vitality determines your appearance and that is true, though obviously when your Jing supply is more abundant in youth this matters less so generally. So it matters and there's overlap but when it comes to psychological maturity it isn't something that just because you look stimulating doesn't mean you are internally stable. There's a higher chance for that but it's not an overlap rule. The more you make her work for your attention the more you'll be appreciated. Your attention is valuable, your vitality is valuable. MAKE HER WORK FOR IT. Not the other way around. When you're working and putting in more than she is then good luck.

Honestly I could just do coaching for young guys at high ticket and make bank and be better than like 90% of these fools. It's all explained with metaphysical principles. The reality is that whenever you are stimulated and you want to put work in but there's no reciprocation then you're being used. Doesn't matter what you believe consciously, the assumption on a current level is lack, and therefore you will manifest signs and lacks. Coaching women on this stuff is honestly much easier because it's just telling them to be as stimulating as possible, though they tell you that the guy won't commit. Yeah, most guys now won't do that. It's an issue that most face and is a challenge to overcome. Why? Because the condition of most modern guys is extreme depletion and now more than ever we're waking up to the face that we're used as batteries by the world around us and get nothing back but being told to be better batteries. It's abuse abuse abuse abuse. Women are also abused, because they're put into narcissistic places of self exaltation that's based on nothing but meaningless validation and entitlement and so these women come to me expecting these 10s and they're not even worth a 5. They have nothing going for them at all, though stimulation matters the most. Getting commitment from the guys as a women is to go along for the ride and not get in the way. It's really that simple. Their challenge is being too parasitic and leeching the vitality out of the guy which also drains the guy of their own desire to expand. This is the issue women face, is this entitlement to vitality while not knowing when enough is enough and being ok with that. The women should ALWAYS be the one to earn the supply. Men are the source, women transform the source into moisture, metaphysical "radical moisture". Moisture is the higher order alchemical substrate that's necessary to build the vessel for transformation to happen and successfully without the elements leaking into places they shouldn't be.

You need to get the woman into a feedback loop of activity and approval. I know this sounds pretty animalistic but you can almost "train" them through offering supply/demand when it's ready to be provided and making them wait for it, else you dip. If you take away supply when they want it unwarranted then you'll have all the power. When women are not demanding of needless supply and go along for the ride without expectation then they gain more supply and win. None of this is about "oppression" but about dynamics of current. The man NEEDS to be in his power for this to work though obviously and if that's not there then the women is with a leech who cannot be the supply for her and she'll obviously go mad in response. This is necessary for relationships to work, so it's not like I'm saying that dysfunction in men breeds function at all, it's that dysfunction in any way breeds more dysfunction. You need the man to be the supply and have that available and without that then you're in a spot of trouble. That foundation is necessary no matter what, since that is your pillar of stone to stand on that will always be the barrier against parasitism. This is why having a slid vision for our life and fixating on unfolding that above all else is how you own that role. So all the ones who talk about women liking guys with confidence and such, it's an EFFECT of this being the supply, it's not that the guy may be externally confident like you'd think but that he's making HER FEEL THAT WAY, through the supply and availability of that ride she goes along for. She's ONLY got the expectation to go along for the ride with you. That's it, and to not demand. Be there for him to transform his current when necessary. That's literally all they need to do, these women, but when they demand more then you're dealing with a parasite who needs to be cut out from supply so that she learns and faces pressure.

The only way to wake up a woman is to take away her supply and make her look within. She MUST learn to understand that vitality isn't just going to be there on demand. If she expects that all the time then you're dealing with a parasite who's not worth a 1/10 no matter how beautiful she is. Cut that trash out. You'll learn very quickly that if you as a man stop valuing their stimulation then you'll see beyond all the superficial trash and recognize she's a cold hearted parasite who is extremely entitled and never learned boundaries or anything about how to genuinely respect and love. Love for women isn't some magic thing. Women love men through simply being there. That's it. Being available to transform the supply of the man. That's it. Seriously it's that easy, but women are being attacked so insanely hard that they're being overly encouraged to be their own supply and be their own person and all this trash taking the role of the man and WANTING that and seeing it as rewarding with the constant propaganda campaigns. Women who play that role will never be satisfied since they'll always lack supply that they'll be unable to get since they're being depleting to men. They can't sustain commitment since commitment requites not being a parasite. If you're beautiful and have boundaries then as a woman you make it. That's all that is needed. All of this lacking commitment from women is that they're being too much to handle, too much pressure for the man to face that he has NO NEED to deal with. He has ZERO expectation to be your support when you're being a parasite. Now every guy has a tolerance for parasitism since every woman ever to live is by default wired to be a parasite since there's no innate supply of solar current (other than God of course which is why women SHOULD do gazing especially) but when a guy feels she's too much then you must learn to distance and detach importance from that transforming factor. Men really don't need women, it's the other way around. Men can be stable without them, but not the other way around, despite what we've been told, as usual. Innately women don't need men if their capacity is accepted but most women need men at their current level of being. DO NOT see what I'm saying as bashing women, I'm simply outlining the clear mechanics that the modern world exploits to establish dysfunction in women by ruining their connection to what would otherwise be a supply of solar current to be functionally independent then, not in this trash we hear now. Women SHOULD be able to hold their own space without needing supply, and that will only benefit relationship dynamics when there's stability and access to solar supply from God within the woman. The man needs access to feminine lunar current also through gazing, and methods such as seed retention for at least 3 week streaks if you want to be truly powerful and independent in supply and not NEED women as your supply. Men who are weak will need women since they lack the yin within to feel stable. The only way to cultivate this for a man is to fast from the world in all forms of needless pseudo satisfaction. The pressure must be felt and transformed to build stability. Women must learn to cut through their trash too by looking at all expectations to overextend and demand more than they really need.

Women simply need to not be parasites, that's their biggest issue. Men need to fixate on a vision for expansion in their lives so that woman have a solid path to walk with their man. That's how you establish commitment and solid boundaries, in principle. Extend and withdraw when necessary. if as a man you extend and it's met with rejection then you're either someone who's compromised on vision and can't be the supply for her to feel illuminated or she's compromised, but I will bet that it's your issue in most cases as the guy. This is very common actually, where a guy will get into a relationship after doing lots of work on himself and then fall back when he's stimulated and has prolactin become his dominant hormone which depletes that drive to expand. Listen. Women CREAVE that expansive current, because they don't have it within them and NEED you as the supply. When you give too much then you deplete that supply and she bails out since there's nothing to give. When she overextends and demands more than she deserves (yes women don't deserve the world, big surprise) then she's got boundary issues and or has conflicts where she feels this need to demand in order to be stable within. This need for excessive current and be a means for her to actually make conscious her own conflicts and conditioning, though in most cases it'll be overwhelmingly a boundary issue because she's simply unable to be stable in her own innate supply from God by being there with the guy. She's simply suppose to drive the guy to expand, and the guy is suppose to own his vision. When the woman takes importance in the dynamic then the relationship will die. Women NEED to be "trained" as I said before by stronger men who have powerful supply and know boundaries. Train her like a child. Sounds petty but it's just the truth. I've observed this myself over the years and it's honestly just like this. You reward good habits with supply and take it away when she's overextending, just like how God punishes us by living in pseudo satisfaction. We cannot compromise or we lose our value. Excellence matters more than anything, and looks and cash and status are effects of that.

Also do keep in mind I'm not telling women to compromise on their vision either, since women will also have vision, though I will say that if the vision the woman has takes precedent as the importance of the relationship then there will be a dynamic that's out of balance. "Girl-bosses" and trash only end up with cuck guys. I know this because I see it in my life with relationships I've seen extensively. Those types were controlled excessively or were depleted needlessly and so seek compensation, and their expression comes out of lack and the need to be seen. As children, women who were invalidated for any attempts to have a self (much like men too) will be wanting then to seek supply to compensate through other means that are available. No man of honest integrity will want to be with a woman who's trying to be her own boss. That's disgusting filth and flies in the face of order. Now there are women who will play a role of similar nature naturally, where they'll for example have a craft of some form where they can produce goods and contribute. This is functional. The issue is when women demand higher positions on hierarchy without being in the position to be worth that role. There's a difference between women who are depleted and lack within and so need compensation for that on the outside to make sense of their lack as a projection, vs the woman who's functional internally and knows that she's innately valuable and doesn't need to seek approval and status to overcompensate. So many conditioned fools who read that will think it's "oppressive" and trash but they need to get schooled hardcore of course. None of that is oppressively, it's just polarity dynamics. The woman wants to feel safe secure and supported through the journey with the guy. Really whenever you hear these things it's stemming from the need to be cared for to some degree, because innately they are the ones who receive and accept, instead of provide supply, as I've said. So women who are in tune with feminine qualities will be able to receive freely, and not demand. That's it. It's so simple. They don't need to be a supply of anything outside of natural striving and their own transformation. I also do not believe that woman who partake in that will gain expansion since expansion is through facing pressure, and this system is providing comfort for them like nothing else. Without that pressure to WANT to transform, meaning to have a man who shows up as a powerful supply then there's no pressure on them to look within and drop the trash. Therefore women in general, upwards of 70% I will say, are heavily conditioned to believe that they're worth way more than they actually are and that anyone who doesn't agree with the delusion is to be outed. That's good for men, because they'll by not playing the games force women to look at their trash. When they lose years of being beautiful flowers ripe to blossom, they'll lose what made their value truly unique at capacity and they'll be forced to drop the trash for good, though many will benefit too much from validation that's meaningless to want to drop it. So generally, women are heavily rewarded for being parasites. Any of these OF girls are the epitome of parasitism. It's literally the exact issue we face, where women are put on the pedestal and men compete for the attention of a parasite who will only suck them dry. It's gross. When you learn to see through all of that trash then you'll recognize that the only thing that matters for functional relationships is a man to have a solid vision for life and for a functional woman to be willing to go along for that ride and not expect more than she really needs along the way.

That's all it needs to be. Making it more than that is the issue. Women trying to be more than they need to be, this is a challenge they face. It's about not NEEDING to be more. They SHOULD be the best that they NEED to be, but not to overextend into trying to play masculine role. This dynamic is the balance that functional relationships are mastered. To be honest too, giving women a satisfaction loop where they can be functional as themselves and attain satisfaction outside of just needing you there is another level of processes within the overarching process. They should be able to receive freely, and not demand excessively. Men should provide to their capacity their supply and not be a weak cuck who demands attention from women to validate their weakness. Men who get attention from women who play games with them feeds their delusions when it's all meaningless and is just the woman being a parasite. The men wake up when they realize that they're being controlled by the expectations of their family units and the system around them to be small and be good batteries. Instead they learn to be their own supply and thus distance from needing anything or anyone else. With all of this in mind, practically, the way LOA applies here is through these dynamics. Push pull, expectations being cut out and functional roles accepted. God is always driving function, the Juize always condition the world to manifest dysfunction and fund ideologies of disorder that cause chaos. God words through them though, which means they're main actors in the play. We need to learn to accept our role and play it to the capacity we have to play. Ultimately we are going to have capacity to realize each of these polarities within us anyway, and that will mean integrating the expression of those dynamics through us. If it's within then it's a comfortable availability that's been integrated to manifest through us in who we are. This is where assumptions, beliefs, and all of that stem from. It's all coming from this level. Integrated supply through acceptance of innate capacity by dropping conditions and trash that want you small and dysfunctional.

Overall then, attraction from men being supply matters to get sparks, and to drive further stimulation for that desire it will need to be consistently available. The appearance is one level of that, among many others. I will once again argue that the inner currents when in supply will manifest externally, thus immortality as a capacity is attainable. The rest is operating as God, knowing yin/yang dynamics and operating correctly within those dynamic ensures correct supply. You won't have negative assumptions about self and even others when you view reality from these dynamics as manifest through the senses. This I believe is a view closer to "God consciousness" where you see beyond the flesh and view the flesh as the manifestation of the currents at play, which are God, and thus can "detach" from needing the flesh to respond the way you want since you can seek supply from within and play the role that's actually satisfying. This is almost entirely about boundaries, and knowing what's the expectations of self vs not self, which in turn will drive how you respond to the world around you. When you're in supply as a man you're unstoppable and any functional woman will want to spend time with you since you'll be what they need that they cannot get. They will always earn your approval, not the other way around, EVER. When the man needs to sucker up to the woman then the dynamic is warped, because the man who's powerful in his own right will not need to seek approval and in turn by their natural expression will demand respect and the woman will compete for that power since they need supply of that yang current from the most powerful source. Men in tern compete for the most abundant transforming factor of yin, the woman who will be there to ride in on their process without getting in the way and be an example of their own power and status in the world, which obviously matters a lot for long term attraction. Men who are powerful can land anyone, provided they're not sub 5 of course. It's the IMPLICATION of that power that makes women weak in the knees. The implication is "this guy has lots of juice to absorb and transform" is what they think unconsciously. The implication is always a supply (or lack of supply) that is relative to their fixed perspective of natural striving that determines how they feel. When they don't have that, then they'll desire it, and that pressure will drive competition to be the most stimulating. Women SHOULD compete for the highest power men, not the other way around. I believe that women competing for high power men is partly how they expand, but since the competition is dead now they're all overly entitled and the dynamics are warped.

That's my take you won't hear anywhere else online about relationships. It still blows my mind how insanely illiterate and ignorant basically everybody in this world is relating to anything meaningful. I only got here through more introspection than anyone else. Because I faced insane pressure I had to find the deepest truth to stand on in principle. This is why I can't really go out there and talk about this stuff because my takes are pretty much something that everybody and yet nobody could agree with. Men being the dominant force in this world isn't a bad thing to state as fact, but so many are unwilling to own that role because of that it implies, what needs to be killed in order to accept it. This is the challenge of life, and also what NG was talking about through implication and meaning, and all the rest of it we've been over. How can I prove that? Well the Christ needs to die and be reborn in a higher order form for manifestation to work, as scripture outlines in the NG doctrine as we've gone over again and again. Dropping the seed and letting it "rot" in the ground or die is "forgetting" about it but you cannot forget if supply isn't attained else the pressure and desire will be felt and thus the principles of RS and NG in this regard overlap 100%. The language he used cannot be twisted to mean anything else outside of this context since all of his examples are clear when talking about seeds, patterns, states, pressures and desire, all of these currents as "feeling" are all there. "Self abandonment is the secret" he says. If self abandonment is the secret then that means that the implication of accepting what you truly desire that necessitates a part of you to die in effect is how you drop the seed and "seal the state" which makes your reactions different since the fixed point of comparison isn't referencing implication of lack now.

Best coach on earth ever to live. Nobody else compares. RS speaks for itself.

The pressure on men is to beat the system, and most of that challenge will come from economic issues, then it will come at a deeper level from unsatisfied needs and warped expectations on how to receive that thing. It will need to come in a specific package or it's not available. You lock yourself out, and the SP you target becomes your salvation for something you can't get any other way. The solution to this is to recognize that The expectation to receive it in the form you've been conditioned is the trap and that the people who hurt you are to take that burden off your shoulders to projecting back what you accepted needlessly from them opens up the opportunity to expand beyond the expectation of needing the specific specific person. SP manifesting only exists because people are so childish and can't get over their parental conditioning. That's why it's so profitable, and why so many people attach to needing this person in their lives. It's all a trap. It almost makes me feel fury when I think about all the people who I have to deal with who don't get that and won't want to get it. It's a boundary telling me to not bother wasting my time with them. I don't NEED to save them, and really I can't. My expectation there is that I'm responsible for saving them, my assumption that I NEVER consciously recognize from this wider angle when I buy into it, that needs to be acted on in ways that burn the bridge, and in my case that would be cranking up my price through the roof and also not even bothering to involve in helping anyone who asks for it without actually compensating my time first in a way that's satisfying for my position to take. They must earn my time, not the other way. I'm not "better" because I help the small guy out there who's just wanting help. That's not how I operate correctly. I have done that and it's almost always wasting both of our time. I can see it so obviously. I don't care about the flak that I'll get on the way out of that sphere, because I will get it because I'm not the supply they want me to be, but that will force them to look more closely at their lacks and be real as I always say. Without that acceptance of how they really feel and to cast the projection they falsely assumed to be as self back to where it belongs then they'll never expand beyond the limits.

Whenever someone is obsessed over and NEEDS an SP, and then goes after me for saying they don't actually want that person (WHCIH BY THE WAY THAT'S WHAT NG ALWAYS SAID) then that's their own inability to feel like they're worth receiving love. Why? Because they've been conditioned to receive it only through a certain way, it's conditional love, and thus the person plays the role of what that expectation is to receive it which is always dysfunctional and when they get burned from it and expect me to magically solve it, then they'll get stuck in the box and unable to cut through the importance of the disproval of their family figures when they'll FEEL the IMPLICATION of actually accepting that they can be loved without needing it in the box the expectation demands they accept, This is the solution to a vast majority of SP issues. There's conditions on how you can either receive or give. I had it on how I can receive mostly but also on giving to some extent as well but that was mostly due to social conditioning and not really family conditioning. My parental figures placed locks on me and because the implication of me accepting being loved the way I wanted to be means I'd be hurting their expectations and control over how I would receive it then I'd end up with extreme anxiety that ruined my life. They did this to me, though the NG view is that because God plays all roles then it's not them but the currents of God driving this, and yeah I can see that, though from the perception of being in lower consciousness to be able to even reach a higher level of expansion, this is a necessary stepping stone to viewing things more from clarity and function. This is why I rail against the idea that we should see everyone as God and self pushed out because IT DOESN'T WORK! You WILL have that condition rule your life until you learn to accept how you really feel and cut through the importance of that to INTEGRATE that current and thus then be able to in effect see through their projection and manifestation on the thematic current God level. Until you cut through the trash on the lower more baseline level then you'll be unable to meaningfully see on that wider level, because seeing on that wider level necessitates that you're open enough on the subconscious and superconscious to have that view available in the first place. Those who are illiterate on these mechanics will say that anyone can experience God, and I will say yeah you can but you can't experience ALL of God, and even NG said that the pattern within, the Christ seed, has it's own appointed hour or ripeness. Therefore saying that you can apply a method to experience being God is insane and delusional trash. That's only because of the utter insane garbage out there being pushed without competition that's causing this mass delusion.

We must learn to see things from the level we're at to be able to expand, and trying to expand beyond your current capacity and what's ripe to unfold is only going to keep you stuck. How you really feel is the way you start with all of this. Always has been always will be. Don't care one bit what anyone else says. unless they can systematically explore ALL of the variables and how they overlap then I stand above the rest as the leader in this space. Nobody else compares, not even close. Every word that comes out of my mouth is worth millions. Nobody else comes close to competing. They don't have the fire to want to be the best like I do. Screw all the trash this is just how things are and if you want satisfaction in life and real expansion then RS is the only reliable system to apply for that. It works for everybody in all ways because of the systematic exploration of every variable at play that most people don't even know exists to recognize.

This page in itself is worth thousands. Screw it.

Really let's just also get real here too right. If a girl likes you, as a guy, and she plays games, she's a parasite. By games I mean she plays this stupid waiting to see if you message back and trash tests that just confirm biases and whatnot. She wouldn't do that with the chads I can bet. Look if someone is actually interested and you are too, you'll both want to involve in spending time together at any opportunity that's fulfilling. There won't be any of this leaving on read for days. That's not innate behavior, that's conditions showing up because she can't trust. If someone does that, you're not worth their time. Back in the early days of puppy love nobody would play those games, it's only when they get burned. This is what I mean. I'm not saying here anything other than someone who's functional wouldn't deliberately test. The girls who I got attraction from back in the day in at least probably 30% of instances would play that game, or they'd make up stories to test my response. I see tests as "I've been hurt and I can't trust unless I feel safe". It's a lack mindset, and that for her means that she can't be open since being open before burned her. That's also something about this commitment stuff that shows up too. Someone who's unwilling to commit also probably either has other options and they're playing games with you or that they can't receive, or even give in their case. What assumptions cause you to end up in these places and pick these people? I'd say it's because you're unable to accept your vision for life and that you're given the run around because you innately feel you're not worth the person you want. Cutting through it simply means stop putting in effort, because I can mostly bet that you initiated with the girl who did this to you, like I did. I got attraction from cold initiation from 5-6 pretty reliably when I wanted it and they'd ask for my details without prompt. Thing is those ones also often played games. The ones who go for you rarely play games. They like you but not LIKE LIKE you in the cases when they play games. They still see you as an option, not as priority. You're either not fire enough for them to CRAVE or they have issues. I'd say it's likely on your part that you're not fire enough in those cases, which as I said above the Chad would get the attention without conditions from those women. You don't because you've not got the same fire that stimulates them.

So I will go out and say over and over, that if you're not a 7-8+ then cold approaching women to get attraction isn't going to work reliably. That also doesn't mean that if you are in that boat that you'd get commitment, but it's more likely since this is a numbers game too. If you're in the place where you're fixated on your vision, then someone who sees your value and respects you and wants to spend time with you and prioritize you will not play games, or at least nowhere near to the extent. She will want to respond quickly. If she doesn't respond in a reasonable time then she doesn't want you as a priority and that's not someone who's worth your time. You should have women COMPETING for your attention as a guy. Period. If you're not there then work on your vision and let them come to you. If your vision if truly satisfying then you won't even care if women value you or not because you don't need them, hence why you'll naturally be detached and not make dumb moves. This is where I got to before I got my current girl, or at least was in a much better place than I use to be. You shouldn't need to lift a finger to make it happen. If she shows you attention and consistently shows up for you then she wants you, though obviously if she's stalking you and being obsessive then it's also dysfunctional. You'll know the difference though. So when they put in effort then you're in prime to accept their offer if you also want them back. Simple really. Fixate on your vision and provide supply. Can't lose. The challenge there comes down to what's necessary to be the supply and all the conditions on that.

I'm just going to focus on gazing method and milk the life out of that since NOBODY else online talks about it. I can also talk about implication but under the conventional perspective and making it important. I will not talk about the deeper levels of cutting through conditioning publicly since most people can't handle the truth. I will on my other channel but I will not reveal that to anybody and leave it to organically grow over time as it may. That's where RS is unfiltered, at least as much as YT allows it to be. Death and rebirth is another one I can talk about endlessly. Just make programs on all of these things and milk it for every cent it's worth. Those who want facts can come here. I want to make millions for the first time. ACTUALLY crank out the cash.

"Revise, then drop it as he dropped the ball. Release the past and hold onto the vision of what you want in its place. With this power you can completely redeem the past, “And God requires the past.” And, although your sins be as scarlet they shall be white as snow." - Christ in man 1966

So right here we have dropping it under the context of letting go of the trash.

"I was late getting here tonight. A friend came for lunch yesterday who, knowing the friend who brings me here every week, said: “Isn’t he unreliable?” and I immediately answered, “No! Never.” She didn’t want to hear that and is a very intense lady who knows how to reach him. Today for the first time my friend called to say he couldn’t make it. An intense imaginal act produced what the lady wanted to hear, but she will never get the satisfaction of hearing me say he was ever late or did not come.

There are people in this world whose surface veneer appears to be altogether wonderful, but below that surface, there is an intensity and they do not know that they are only hurting themselves. She can’t touch me, although undoubtedly she has tried; but if she did it would boomerang in a way she would not know. I love her dearly, but she is intense and also of the same school that if you are not of a certain physical background you are not “in.”" - enter the dream 1969

Just another interesting quote. NG here said that she wasn't able to touch him and that her intensity would boomerang back at her. This implies she has her own thoughts, else why would he say that. Why would he even speak about stories like her if according to the conventional LOA doctrine "everyone is you pushed out" and talking about bad things only shows your life is bad, which we all know is just stupid.

"I have given you, I think, a perfect technique to prove that you are a servant. Try it today! If you succeed in the simplest little way of taking an invisible state and making it become a reality, like the job for a friend or even the getting of a hat, or even the finding of the proper apartment, or even the getting of some little thing . . you try it. If you lost something, “Nothing is lost in all my holy mountain,” sayeth the Lord, for if it isn’t lost it is scattered now in Israel. Prove that it isn’t lost. What is it that you have lost? Well, take it in your own mind’s eye and then mentally touch it and mentally appropriate it and feel that you have it, that it is yours now, and remain faithful to that assumption and see if the thing returns. If the thing is recovered, you have proved that you have found Israel (a portion of him anyway) and you know how to take him and clothe him in such tones of reality that you can bring him to the Lord, for the Lord is your own wonderful consciousness. When you say: “I AM,” that is the Lord. Go tell them I AM hath sent you. So when you walk in the feeling “I AM so and so,” it is not seen as yet, but that is something you are bringing to the Lord, and the more you feel it to be real, the more natural it becomes. Then it clothes itself in external facts, but the external fact is not the truth of it. Truth and fact oppose each other. Truth does not depend upon fact. Truth depends upon the intensity of your imagination. Therefore, if I actually am intense about it, that is true. I might tomorrow find a corresponding fact to bear witness . . but, as I said earlier, let me not continue in that assumption and the fact will fade, proving it was not reality at all. Reality was in my assumption, and so truth depends not upon fact, but upon the intensity of imagination." - feed my sheep 1956

Another interesting one. Here's that "intensity" thing again. This intensity idea is interesting. Intensity seems to be an intensity of charge and fixation.

"If I could become now intense from that three-dimensional or threefold thing and dream intensely and enter my dream, that’s fourfold vision…if I could now start with my images and dream so intensely that I step into the dream. But if I don’t, it doesn’t mean it will not work. If I persist in it so that the dream obliterates what was and becomes the reality, that’s fourfold vision. Now this [world] is fourfold vision. Man has forgotten when he started this dream and he’s entered his dream. As Thoreau said, “The truest life is to be in a dream awake.”" - Blake: four types of vision 1968

I just wanted to throw this one in here again because it's NG telling us that we don't need to enter into it with sensory depth. Here intensely implies sensory depth, but obviously what comes out of that is implication as feeling which determines how you feel. For anyone who's done this in deep compromise you'll feel anxiety when you enter into what you want, as I did many times in the past and got VERY SICK from it. I will always remember my experiences of vivid sensory details that I imagined like a memory causing me bad sickness physically. I never intended that, but the intense anxiety I felt when I heard what I wanted being said it made my life 100x worse. This is why I cannot stand what's being taught, because it cannot work. The implication of the intensity I was experiencing was deep deep lack. The only way I could get what I wanted was to kill off the part of me that saw the condition that caused my anxiety as important and own what I wanted fully. This was necessary. I ONLY did that through dropping the whole LOA stuff and living with some common sense for once instead. I valued my vitality and then I could approach those scenes 100x more clearly and really I didn't even consciously do anything with that because the desire was there and it came through me when ripe. This thing NG is teaching is simply a sort of reboot to get you to move qi and move currents to go the last step into acceptance. I was talking about this with another regular client of mine who's going hard with this stuff and knows all about these mechanics because they've experienced it all.

"That if you desire something intensely and you truly desire it, and you have a clear mental picture of what you would like to be or what you would like to accomplish, or what you would like another friend to realize . . you know exactly what you would like in this world. Now, this is the water by which it could be born. But it cannot be born of water only; it must be born of water and blood. So I will give you the water. When you know what you want, you make as vivid and as lifelike a representation of what you would see, of what you would hear, and what you would do, were you physically present and physically moving about in such a situation.

To take an example: Suppose I desired a certain apartment, or home, or business. (Take one, so you will not be confused. We will take an apartment.) But reason tells me I cannot afford it. Reason tells me I haven’t enough furniture for so big an apartment. Reason tells me a thousand things that would deny that I could ever realize it, but I still would like it. Now this is what I would give you in the form of water, for something must come out of nothing and life out of death. To embody that state I make it real. You pull it seemingly from a state that is non-existent, therefore something out of nothing. To make it real and to incarnate it and to become alive to it and it to you, you are pulling life out of death.

Now this is what you do. There is a death involved but it is not the kind of death that men call death. There is a death . . there is a radical change of state of mind. You completely give up the belief that you are not living in such a place. That is irrational. But that is what you are called upon to do, to completely deny the evidence of your senses and to boldly assume that you are already in that state that you occupy. There you dwell in a state that reason denies. You dwell in an assumption that your senses deny.

That is [not] just the water. If you do it, you are applying the blood. If you are told to do it you are given the truth, for it will work. That water, if you could only add the blood to it, will bring the invisible state into the visible world, and what seemingly is non-existent will crystallize and harden into fact. But if you only know it as too many of us know it, and think the mere knowledge is enough, we will come here on Sunday and thoroughly enjoy this wonderful hour . . the music, the message, the meditation, the feeling of companionship you find here. And the whole thing is a thrill for an hour . . but such knowledge cannot bring Christ Jesus to birth. In this state, Christ Jesus (now I’ll analyze it for you)… on a lower plane the word, “Jesus” (Heb. Jeshua) means “salvation, to save.”

So if I desire something and I don’t realize it, then I simply continue a life of frustration. If I realize my objective, I have been saved from frustration. Take a simple matter: Suppose I wanted a suit of clothes because I was in need of raiment. If I don’t realize the suit of clothes, I am not saved from my nudity. If I realize the suit of clothes, I have been saved. For this is an all. . inclusive savior, not just a man. If I wanted water, literal water, a lecture will not quench my thirst. If I wanted food, literal food, the most wonderful revelation would not actually satisfy my hunger. So Jesus is all-inclusive, meaning everything you desire. He is it, because if you embodied that desire, you embodied your Jesus. Now, to embody Jesus, he cannot be embodied by the knowledge of what to do only. He can only be embodied by the application of that knowledge. So the knowledge of what to do is called water, the “water of truth”; but the use of that lovingly is called the flowing (shedding) of the blood.

So here we find the symbols that always accompany birth, that which is presented in this mystery. You are told the limit is within you. You make the limit; there is no limit. Whatsoever you desire, ask in my name, for name simply means nature. If I wanted to be in a house and to feel that I am the occupant of that house, there is a certain feeling, a certain nature that goes with it. I must appropriate it as though it were true. Here I am called upon to bring something alive out of a state that is dead. For if I told you what I have done, you would question my sanity and you would feel I am trying to give expression to something that is being pulled out of nothing.

For you cannot see it . . you don’t see me in the house, you don’t see me actually occupying and enjoying the life that you know I desire to enjoy. So if I persist in that assumption, to you (if you should know my persistence) you might think I am headed towards a form of insanity. But if tomorrow the house becomes an embodied fact and I the occupant, then you look at it passively and you will still try to justify it by tracing its appearance back to a visible cause. You will see that in some way, unknown to you, my resources were lifted up, that in some way I became more eligible for that house and you will trace it back to a change in my fortune. You will trace it back to a change in something in my world, but you won’t trace these changes back to the unseen assumption in which I dwell." - by water and blood 1956

This whole section here is good stuff. I think I understand now what water really means too. Looking at it without the elemental lens, water being "truth" is the vision. That's it. Since NG talks about truth and facts as opposites then water must represent the inner vision for what you hold to be true.

"Now this is what you do. There is a death involved but it is not the kind of death that men call death. There is a death . . there is a radical change of state of mind. You completely give up the belief that you are not living in such a place. That is irrational. But that is what you are called upon to do, to completely deny the evidence of your senses and to boldly assume that you are already in that state that you occupy. There you dwell in a state that reason denies. You dwell in an assumption that your senses deny." - same

This is the interesting part if you ask me. This radical change of attitude, state of mind. He tells us to give up the belief that you're not the ideal. Well practically that will mean giving up ALL conditions as well, and that means we will have to cut through the implications of those and how other people's expectations are more important than our vision. He doesn't say that here but that's what we all know we go through, so it's easier said than done obviously. Interestingly he also says: "So if I desire something and I don’t realize it, then I simply continue a life of frustration. If I realize my objective, I have been saved from frustration." and this right here is true. Frustration. Satisfaction releases frustration.

"Whatsoever you desire, ask in my name, for name simply means nature. If I wanted to be in a house and to feel that I am the occupant of that house, there is a certain feeling, a certain nature that goes with it. I must appropriate it as though it were true."

A certain "nature" that goes with it. Nature.

This is Websters original dictionary

"3. The essence, essential qualities or attributes of a thing, which constitute it what it is; as the nature of the soul; the nature of blood; the nature of a fluid; the nature of plants, or of a metal; the nature of a circle or an angle. When we speak of the nature of man, we understand the peculiar constitution of his body or mind, or the qualities of the species which distinguish him from other animals. When we speak of the nature of a man, or an individual of the race, we mean his particular qualities or constitution; either the peculiar temperament of his body, or the affections of his mind, his natural appetites, passions, disposition or temper. So of irrational animals."

Nature right there defining this context. The nature or "essence" and attributes of it. You adopt the quality of that thing, or in this case the state, the attitude, that quality is the feeling, which all feeling is charge phenomena based on implication of what is and isn't available to us. It's a mixture of various currents all moving together.

"So if I desire something and I don’t realize it, then I simply continue a life of frustration. If I realize my objective, I have been saved from frustration. Take a simple matter: Suppose I wanted a suit of clothes because I was in need of raiment. If I don’t realize the suit of clothes, I am not saved from my nudity. If I realize the suit of clothes, I have been saved. For this is an all. . inclusive savior, not just a man. If I wanted water, literal water, a lecture will not quench my thirst. If I wanted food, literal food, the most wonderful revelation would not actually satisfy my hunger. So Jesus is all-inclusive, meaning everything you desire. He is it, because if you embodied that desire, you embodied your Jesus. Now, to embody Jesus, he cannot be embodied by the knowledge of what to do only. He can only be embodied by the application of that knowledge. So the knowledge of what to do is called water, the “water of truth”; but the use of that lovingly is called the flowing (shedding) of the blood."

Here's another section from that lecture. Jesus is all things he says, including literal physical things and he tells us that revelations and such aren't going to necessarily bring about physical things. I can agree to some extent, but he's giving very common sense examples here.

"Now this is how a man is born of water and of the spirit. If I told you now that an assumption, though false, if persisted in, will harden into fact, that is a truth, that is water. But water is not enough. You must catch the spirit of it and apply that truth. Well, if I know that if I assume that I am the man I want to be and persist in that assumption, I would gradually become that. If I have that knowledge, that’s marvelous. But not to DO it is to try to bring this being to birth by water only. We are told this is the one who came by water and the blood. Not by water only, but by water and the blood. In other words, I have the knowledge, but I cannot bring to birth my ideal by bare knowledge. I must put it into action, I must DO it. Then when I DO it, I take my savior and I crystallize him by the doing. This is the story of our wonderful Easter."

Do it. Doing it is dying to the state that says you can't, meaning a "radical change in attitude" and attitude is charge.

I think I know how to make videos that will get tons of views and blow everything out of the water.

"The prophecy of the Old Testament is the seed which a carpenter called Jesus brings to birth. He comes not to abolish the law and the prophets but to fulfill them. The word, ‘bread’ in the statement: “Cast your bread upon the waters,” means to devour; to consume. Water is a euphemism for semen, that living water which carries the sperm of man. The creative act is psychological, not physical; yet the intentions are the same. You must cast your bread upon the waters with passion! You must be consumed with the desire and literally on fire with love for its possession, for an intense imaginal act will always draw unto itself its own affinity." - the game of life 1969

Well there you go. Intensity.

"Now, another rule is said in this manner: “Cast your bread upon the water and you will find it after many days.” In other words, do not be concerned as to how it is going to happen . . just do it. This statement hasn’t a thing to do with doing good as the world defines the word. Jesus was a carpenter. The word means one who produces from seed . . as a flower, a tree, the earth."

The earth. The tree and flower and seed. Earth he sees as this pattern, which alchemically speaking is correct since the aetheric template is on the subconscious level.

"You suggest, and they accept the suggestions; and then you, knowing they are going to act upon it, go out and then you do exactly what you have to do: work under compulsion to meet everyone you can and get them out. And then he sits back with his pipe, and he is so stunned! He can’t believe for one moment they would throw him out, any more than Churchill could believe they would throw him out after the victorious campaign in Europe. But they did!

Everything in this world is possible. Do not say “No” to anything if you want it to be “Yes.” Don’t give up. Everything is possible, because David does your will, and David is the symbol of humanity. Humanity does your will." - you dare to assume 1970

Well well well. Suggest. You suggest and they accept the suggestions. I've quoted this one before and it's under the context of a political shift that someone initiated. Point is that here is that suggestion term again. I'm searching for "wine" and that wine is the term that comes up 197 times over all his lectures.

"So when I speak of the water and the blood, I speak not of the things that you can see with the eye, such as water and blood. They are only symbolized functions of the mind and the function first comes with water. I must first know what to do before I can do it. So water comes first. He takes water and puts it into a stone jar gives it something like a shape, and from that stone jar filled with water, he draws . . not water, but he converts it; he draws wine (blood)." - by water and blood

Here's NG telling us that wine is blood and the shedding of blood is the death of the Christ into a new form.

"The world is forever echoing the changes taking place in you when you stop drinking the water by absorbing the psychological meaning of scripture and applying its message by drinking the wine. Drink wine from now on and change your world. Make it conform to the ideal that you would like to have. That is acting, and God only acts and is in existing beings or men. If you don’t act upon the knowledge you have, then God is asleep in you. It is time to “Awake O sleeper! Why sleepest thou O Lord? Awake! Do not cast us off forever. Awake and rise from the dead.”"

So faith without acts is dead. Well how does that work still? If having faith is theory and acts is application then it can work otherwise I don't see how.

". . you are influencing everyone, even though they do not see your picture or read your book. As Yeats again said:

“Having seen the operation of this law, we should never be certain it was not some woman treading the winepress who started that subtle change in men’s minds, or that the passion because of which so many countries were given to the sword did not begin in the mind of some shepherd boy, lighting up his eyes for a moment before it ran upon its way.”

Who knows who, this night, feels neglected, feels hurt, feels wrongfully accused, and who is sitting alone and “treading in the winepress,” who tomorrow will influence some catastrophe? Some shepherd boy dreaming of some heroic future and thinking only in terms of war that could bring him the crown of a hero . . he . . while tending his sheep . . is simply dreaming of being a hero, and using his talent, which is God . . using his imagination in some destructive manner, even though he tends the sheep.

So, I say to everyone, “Know what you are doing every moment of time because your imagining is creating reality.”" - God given talent 1971

A change of mind. Treading the winepress according to NG is living in dissatisfaction it seems.

Right there. Treading the winepress is dwelling and in this case it's in unresolved conflicts.

"The prophets and poets, inspired by the same voice, have told us this throughout the centuries. Yeats said: “I will never be certain that it was not some woman treading in the winepress who started that subtle change in men’s mind. Or the passion, from which so many countries have been put to the sword, did not begin in the mind of some poor shepherd boy, lighting up his eyes for a moment before he ran upon his way.” Who knows who is treading in the winepress this night? Who knows what a person in solitary confinement is imagining? Is he using this only power in the universe infernally or blissfully? I hope you use your imagination in the state of bliss, for the outside world is alive because of this hidden power within you. I know that a man, imagining intensely can influence millions. He can act through many men and speak with many voices. This little group of men, imagining their promotions, are influencing millions and moving through unnumbered men toward their goal. Those who cover their costumes with medals, like the Stalins and the Hitlers of the world, are displaying their complete misunderstanding of God’s power of imagination." - the hidden cause 1969

Here's NG defining it for us. Treading the winepress here is simply dwelling with feeling, imagining something intensely.

"No matter what you are doing, can you see clearly what you want to do and carry on a conversation inwardly with a friend which will imply that which you desire is now a fact? Then do it. For on higher levels of Imagining inner activity is revealed by inner conversation. If man would listen to what he is inwardly saying, he would know what he is setting in motion. As man walks the street if he would pause and say “what am I saying now?” he would find that 99% are justifying failure. But we are told, “You are without excuse for you have seen him and his work, yet you deny it.” When you hear the word God or Jesus Christ you think of some being external to your own imagining, but there is none for Imagining is God. That is what lights every being in the world, and as you imagine, so you will become. So no matter what your present limitations are, you can start now to dream the most noble dream, and you can walk through this door tonight as though it is true knowing that your Imagining is God. There is no fiction. You can write your own novel and realize it. Even someone in a dungeon may be imagining and who knows what he may call forth. If I were in a dungeon I would move the world if necessary to get out. A body may be physically confined, but you cannot confine God. Man only sees the proximate cause; the real cause of something you cannot see; for the invisible power is what is creating. Who knows who may convulse the world. It may even be a woman “treading” in the wine press." - the only Christianity 1959

Another example.

"But I say to you: your imagination manifests itself in the imaginations of men. The world is playing its part, because you are imagining every moment in time. Who knows who is treading in the winepress tonight, causing the subtle change in the minds of men. Perhaps he feels wrongfully accused, and is now sitting in jail thinking of getting even with society. That’s treading in the winepress. When he can lift his thoughts to the point of vision, the act is committed, and it will manifest itself in the world of man," - the secret of causation

Notice how every example he uses to define the whole treading the winepress here is about being stuck in some seeming dead end. Being locked in a dungeon. He says the person who imagines freedom within that dungeon is treading the winepress and thus moves the world to manifest his freedom.

"Who knows who is producing the changes in the minds of men today, producing war or peace. It could be some woman treading in the winepress; or . . as Yeats said . . it could be in the mind of some shepherd boy, lighting up his eyes for a moment before he ran upon his way. Dreaming of heroism, of noble battles where he was the hero, that little boy can cause the blood to flow. If you know who you are and how imagination operates, you will learn to control your imaginal activities. If you do not, they will be controlled for you by another, and you will become their victim." - same lecture

This is another example of NG talking about David the shepherd boy dreaming of heroism. Dreaming. Dreaming of some greater vision. Look at what he said at the end there too. I'll quote it again.

"If you know who you are and how imagination operates, you will learn to control your imaginal activities. If you do not, they will be controlled for you by another, and you will become their victim."

The other people will control you. That's spot on. They do, they bind us to expectations and conditions on who we can be. If we know ourselves (which if you reference the mechanics above you'll understand that) then we are free from their influence.

"Millions of people believe that someone has placed a curse on the Kennedy’s. Do you know that such powers do exist, because imagining creates reality. William Butler Yeats once said: “I will never be certain it was not some woman treading in the winepress who started the subtle change in men’s mind. Or that the pressing out of which so many countries were given to the sword, did not begin in the mind of some shepherd boy, lighting up his eyes for a moment before it ran upon its way.” Who knows who, this night . . feeling hurt and betrayed by a friend . . will set his thoughts of anger and revenge into motion, with no thought of regret. Perhaps he does not know the art of forgiveness or have the desire to forgive, thereby allowing his thoughts to move and build and build until they come to their inevitable end . . by out picturing themselves in his life. But as George Bernard Shaw said: “Some men see things as they are and say, Why? I see things that never were and say, Why not?” I tell you the incredible story of Jesus Christ, the pattern which man must follow in order to escape eternal death, and say, Why not?" - walk on the water 1968

Man he references this Yeats guy a lot. I've not quoted him saying this in all cases but my search results show his quote that's above here coming up many times.

"Well, if he insists on doing it, he’ll do it. You can’t stop a man from imagining. Put me in jail and throw away the key, but you can’t stop me from imagining. And who knows who is “treading the winepress”? (Nehemiah 13:15) It could be some woman in jail who is thinking that she is injured, that she is not entitled to that treatment; and she is carrying on in her mind’s eye the most dramatic scenes . . and they aren’t love scenes! These are all seeds that are being planted; and when the seeds come up for recognition, we don’t even recognize our own harvest." - who am I? 1968

Here's once again another example of someone being locked in the dungeon imagining something and "treading the winepress". Isn't that interesting how he ALWAYS references someone being locked away. It must mean that there's a connotation of intensity out of retribution or something. Treading the winepress pretty much always here relates to something negative, though in principle it doesn't mean that.

There's this one again, just to tie it together. Intensity of feeling, it seems that someone treading the winepress in his examples is someone caught up in hatred and such for their condition and buying into circumstances. They lose their vision and give importance to expectations and their imaginal acts imply their stagnations.

"Well, may I say to you, in the Bible, we speak of stone, the water, and the wine. The stone is the literal story, the allegory. And man must discover the fictitious nature and character of a story. And when he discovers the fictitious character of the story in scripture and then learns its meaning, he has found water. He has struck that rock like a Moses and water flowed out of it. Now, the first miracle or sign in the Book of John is the turning of water into wine. And so, you’re told, “Fill the stone jars with water and when they draw it out of the stone jars, that water that was in the stone jar, it was wine, perfect wine, lovely wine. So, first we have a story and man takes the story and accepts the story literally and so he goes through life with the literal meaning or the stone. When he discovers the fictitious character of the story and then it reveals itself to him, the true meaning, he has the psychological water. Now the little dog is the symbol of faith. Your faith is now in the psychological meaning of these great truths. If you apply what you know, you will convert it into wine. If you apply it. If you will take what you now know, that imagining creates reality, and dare to imagine that you are now what you would like to be, then you are turning this water into wine." - every natural effect unknown date

Here's more on wine water and stone.

"I urge you to learn the art of moving. Now, motion can be detected only by a change of position relative to another object. If I moved to the end of this room and everything went with me I would not know that I had moved. Objects must remain permanent relative to my motion so that when I move I can see them differently. This is true not only in space, but in states. Perhaps I want to move relative to my present business position. Blake urges us to enter into the images in our imagination. In other words, I must move. I must penetrate my new image of myself psychologically. If I have been promoted, the people who work in the office now will see me differently. Having moved, I remain there until they all see me fulfilling that state, and there I remain. I have entered the state and germinated it. I, the creative power of the state, have now fertilized it and know that if it is not now it will come; for if I remain aware of my new status those who formerly may have disliked me must see me as I saw myself, and if they have the power to promote me they will. Just as the lady in little Barbados was compelled to place me on the top of her list because I went into that state, walked up the gangplank, felt the reality, and saw a world as I would see it if it were true, so will the outer world be compelled to see me as I see myself." - examine yourselves 1968

"I give you water by telling you how the law operates. Now you must turn it into wine by application. You must examine yourself to see whether you are holding to your faith. You must test yourself to see if you believe that Jesus Christ is in you. If Jesus Christ is the creative power of God and he is in you, who can you test but yourself? Desiring to be wedded to a new state, turn the water of desire into the wine of fulfillment through application. Sleep this night in the consciousness of being in the state you want to express. Drink the wine of fulfillment and you have moved and things will happen. Your world will change from what it was because you have moved psychologically." - same lecture

So here he says that water is the knowledge of how to apply something. Wine is the application of that knowledge. You could argue that water is a theoretical structure, but not penetrated with the power of God yet. There's no movement of currents. NG has said over and over that implication has the power. If an applied imagined experience will have power it MUST move current to some degree or another, be it in the positive to leave behind mediocrity or be it a total change from negative to acceptance of more of self.

"On this level you can take that command, “Time to Act” and “No longer drink only water, but use a little wine for your stomach’s sake.” Water symbolizes the psychological life. In the second chapter of John, the story is told of Jesus filling the stone jars with water. Now, stone is the symbol of literal facts and water the symbol of their psychological interpretation. When you repent by changing the literal facts to conform to your fulfilled desire, your water has turned into wine, for wine is the application of the truth that you have heard." - God only acts 1966

Well that's a pretty clear definition. Man there's so many quotes I have no idea how to organize them all. When he says to repent though I find that interesting that he's talking about how you do it through changing the facts. That would IMPLY that change is necessary though of course.

"If I heard you were ill, saw this literal fact but wanted to turn this water into wine, I would see you healthy. Then I would repent by actually persuading myself that I am seeing you in the perfect embodiment of health, and so persuade myself of this fact that when I think of you I can see only health. When I see only this new, healthy you in my mind’s eye I have drunk the wine of fulfillment and won’t bring you up any more, as I know what you want to be pictured in my world. represent. Now, instead of drinking that water, turn it into wine by applying the knowledge you have and repent. Do not be remorseful or feel regretful, but when you see someone in need, fill it, for he is only yourself pushed out." - same

"Now to those who are sound asleep this may seem to you too startling: this may be just as startling as Einstein’s equation was; that was startling too. But I tell you I’ve seen it and I see it . . men are destined to be trees in the garden of God. They are planted on earth for a purpose and they don’t always remain men, they are transformed as they turn in and turn up. This is the true meaning of the transfiguration. There is a complete metamorphosis taking place like the grub into the butterfly. You don’t remain what you appear to be when man is asleep, and there is no more glorious picture in the world than to see this living animated human being, for every branch within him is represented by an extension of himself called another, and when he lifts the other up that branch not only comes into leafage but it blossoms and the living human blossoms that blossom upon the tree of man who awakens." - Awakened imagination 1954

Trees and branches. "for every branch within him is represented by an extension of himself called another," Well there's everyone is you pushed out defined. He's not saying that from ANY perspective other than God branching out into everyone else. It's the you in capacity is everyone is representing as pushed out.

"Always remember that the Bible is addressed to the man of imagination and not to any mortal man. Blake said: “It must be understood that the persons Moses and Abraham are not here meant, but are states signified by those names. The individuals being representatives (or visions) of those states as they were seen by mortal man in a series of divine revelations and recorded in the Bible.” I have seen these states in my imagination. At a distance they appeared as one man; however, as I drew near they became a multitude of nations. One man, represented by multitudes and multitudes of men in harmony, appears as a single being. The ancients saw Him and believing in what they saw they prophesied of the ultimate state, and personified him as Jesus Christ." - before Abraham was I AM 1968

Visions. Others being visions of states, representatives, implied sensory details of those currents within you to be mediated and organized proportionately.

"Now he said, “As the man said this, I must have entered into the spirit of that young man because I felt the embarrassment. I felt the feeling that this is unworthy…I’m not really worthy of all this because it was so easy. I only did what I ought to have done a long time ago. So I must have entered at one little moment from the disembodied observer to be the star in the drama. But then, I must have gone back to be to being the observer, because I heard him say it. Yet in it, it was not a vicarious thrill…I was actually experiencing the thrill. I entered into the state. So my rehearsal at night went right into the actual act, only it seemed to be that I am observing someone else.” Well, let me tell him, there is no one else. Humanity is a single being…in spite of its myriad forms and faces, and there is only in such seeming separation as we find in our own being when we are dramatically sundered in dream. So he was dramatically sundered and then a seeming other is playing the part that he wrote for himself. He played it. I can only tell him now, wait patiently, it’s done! You entered into a fourfold vision. Brought it right in through your own intensity when you spent the day on Tuesday constructing the scene which would imply the fulfillment of your dream, and rehearsed until the voices began to come alive, and the scenery became alive. Then at night you started it all over again and half-way through you fell asleep…as we are here asleep dreaming this.

Here, we are sundered too. Every being in my world is myself pushed out, made visible. I haven’t catalogued all the individuals and given to myself the image that it represents. But as my friend last Friday night, speaking of his mother, and how many years ago he came to the conclusion she was only an image, an image of the material world. Then came this wonderful mystical experience where he finds himself a young man in a suite of rooms looking out over the sea. He sits down and he writes a letter to his mother. He’s just about to go out to post it when a lady enters through the front door, and he turns to her and says, “I’ve just decided to go post a letter to my mother, but I’ve only just remembered that she’s dead, that she died.” So the lady said, “Yes, she died a long, long time ago,” which surprised him because it didn’t seem that she was gone that long. In our measure of time it was only a few months, but she implied it was a long, long time ago. Then he asked a very simple question, “Well, hasn’t my mother been paying for these rooms?” and she replied, “No, the undertaker has been doing it. He felt it better that you should think that she was providing for you until you came to your senses.” He’s on the verge of completely awakening, because he has already been elected. That short interval between being completely elected and taking office in an entirely different age is just around the corner. I don’t mean to disturb him by saying tonight, tomorrow night, for no one knows the day. He will not go one hour before his time; neither will he delay one hour.

As we are told in scripture today with the new translation, “Who by taking thought could add one hour to his span of time?” It used to be said that “…by taking thought could add one cubit to his stature?” That has now been changed from a measurement of space to a measurement of time. “Who by taking thought or by being anxious could add one hour to his span of life?” You can’t do it, so you need not be anxious because you aren’t going to postpone it. You aren’t in any way going to hasten it, in spite of what all our wise men tell us about transplants and doing this and extending life today, because we know more about the human body and more about diets. You read the obituary columns in the morning and all the dieticians die just as the others, and all the doctors go the same way, and they don’t live one hour more than those they’re treating." - Blake: four types of vision 1968

So here's a long one. At the end he talks about how death is pre-determined, but before that he mentions about others as self. You observe someone else you're observing self. That's a capacity of expanded awareness. I cant say I've ever experienced this viscerally myself as in a vision I had not that I willingly did it, but I've had results with imagining myself as another and seen VERY radical shifts. I felt current move within me in response to that vision. That person flipped like a switch. I've not done too many experiments like this but I know if I have desire again for applying it with this method it will work for me, as I will be ripe for it. This is why I tend to get results reliably when I do imagine because it's always natural when it does and I'm often at a threshold of acceptance. Imagining for the sake of it is useless and depleting and keeping you stuck. Sundered by the way means to divide as well.

"I have never felt such power in my life. Everything came back to me and this glorious creature that was the personification of all my noble acts, my lovely acts, my ever-loving thought, every state . . she glowed, and this one melts before my eyes. So I tell you: you will meet both of them. They are present now. You can’t see them at the moment but they are present wherever you go, but I tell you of them after you exercise Jacob. Every time you persuade yourself of something loving, something lovely . . even though reason at the moment denies it and your senses deny it, everything denies it . . to that degree you are so persuaded, you are feeding this glorious creature and you are denying food to this monster. It isn’t his fault; we gave him birth. As the poet said: “Alas, two souls are housed within thy breast, one to heaven does aspire; the other to earth doth cling.” Two are housed in the breast of every being and that is part of the structure of this world. Everyone is bringing into the world these two and they are invisible until that moment in time when you wrestle the testing of God and your name is changed from Jacob, to Israel. Then you will know why David, the true king of Israel, was the first to make a name for himself by being the first to subdue the Edomites.

You will see the Edomite embodied in a single lad, and that being is a monster; his name is Esau. You will redeem him not by blows, as the historians tell you, for they tell you that he [i.e. David] slaughtered in one night 18,000 Edomites. No, he didn’t slaughter any 18,000 Edomites as individual units. He conquered the whole of Edom, while knowing the embodiment of all was Esau. And when he melted the whole of Esau, he was a man after God’s own heart. So, we are told: “I have found in David a man after my own heart, and he is mine forever, he is my son, I will go before him . . I will be his father and he will be my son.” (Acts 13:24) And that one is being brought forth from the body; it is God’s only begotten, who becomes, in time, the father of that from which it emerged, in Christ Jesus. You are giving birth to Christ Jesus, that is, the father of David. And David will call him: “My father, my Lord, and the rock of my salvation” (Psalm 89). Every being in the world because of this conflict within himself is practically molding and shaping within himself Christ Jesus." - Esau Jacob Israel 1963

"So it becomes that creative power that actually, I would say, fertilizes what Moses represented. Moses represented the pattern man. See that you make everything according to the pattern as it’s being shown you on the mountain. So here, you’re seeing everything clearly. That is a pattern. Don’t alter one little thing. Make it just as it’s shown you on the mountain. But I can’t go in. That is the egg, the perfect egg. That’s the ovum. But an egg remains just an egg until fertilized. It must be fertilized by the sperm. So that sperm must penetrate the surface of the egg. It leaves no hole, either before or after penetration. And no one understands how it happens. Because no one knows, it’s all imagination.

I do not need to go through any door to put myself in a closed room. Seal the room, and I can imagine that I’m in it and I didn’t open a door to go through and I didn’t break down the wall to get through and when I depart, I didn’t go through an open door and I didn’t go through by breaking down the wall. I entered without leaving any hole and I departed without leaving any record of my entrance and departure. So, a little sperm penetrates the surface of an egg and it leaves no hole, either before or after penetration. But unless it penetrates, that egg remains just a perfect pattern of what ought to be or could be but could never by itself, ever unfold. It takes the sperm to penetrate it to make it unfold." - every natural effect unknown date

So he says that everything here is a pattern. Does that mean that the structure he talked about before is a pattern, the same thematic as Moses? A state, an egg, a desire implied. The egg remains a perfect pattern until fertilized. A pathway cascade in capacity yet to branch out and unfold into reality. To make that pathway cascade unfold it takes current to activate it, God, and the implication of that structure that you feel into activates and fertilizes the egg. Lines up with pathway theory from ages back.

"Now, you take it this morning. We invite you to try it for a friend. We ask you to try it for yourself. We have given you many angles how to test it, how to think of what you want first and see in your mind’s eye . . Israel. For when I know clearly in my mind’s eye what I want, I am actually looking at Israel, something that is real. It is real, but I must clothe it now in what the world calls reality by giving it external tones. But the thing was real long before it became a visible fact in the world. I see it in my mind’s eye by making as vivid and as lifelike a representation as possible of what I would see and what I would do and what I would actually hear, were I physically present in such a situation now. When I see it clearly I am looking into the eyes of Israel, and I found him scattered in the world . . but not on the earth, for it is not on earth that I see him. I see him in my mind. Now I am looking at it, and thinking of it, but the secret is to think from it, to occupy that state and get into it. When I get into it I will clothe it with reality. I can think of a place and then close my eyes and assume that I am in that place. When I assume I am in the place, I am clothing it with what the world calls reality. It was real before I clothed it . . when I saw it clearly this was Israel . . but he wants me to bring him, and the only way I can test that I can bring him and prove that I am the servant, is to occupy the state. So, I occupy the feeling of my wish fulfilled. When I get into the feeling of the wish fulfilled and remain faithful to that state, then I am walking in my vision and . . as we are told . . if one would only advance confidently in the direction of his dream and endeavor to live the life which he has imagined, he will meet with a success unexpected. Let me remain faithful to my vision by occupying my vision . . don’t just see it. He demands that I bring him, bring Jacob again unto the Lord." - feed my sheep 1956

So here we have it again. The representation that means what you'd like to have happen. Representation being a symbolic pattern or structure to activate through thematic composition within you the currents that change our belief, mood, association to that thing and mediate pressure and charge. This whole activating a state or seed is working this mechanism. I see this whole remaining faithful and persistent into the vision as an almost direct act of overcoming the world, and not some careless attempt to bring something into your world through magic or whatever which most people try to do. That giving up who you were is part of persistence. You pressurize the flow until the threshold of expansion is reached. I believe then that the connection to specific people, things, is simply just a more refined and specific composition of currents that manifests as those from the top down view of God. That view of things as "everyone is you pushed out" as in your thematic composition on that level determines how then they unfold since they're all branches of God, as your corporeal being is as well as an emanation of your source of emanation/higher genius, when you operate at the highest level for that moment then you're technically playing the other also in extension as the pathway cascades on the aetheric subconscious level overlap everyone since there's a shared collective reality. I have had some examples by which things seem to show up without direct involvement, though I will say that in every case, there was a limit pushed by which that occurred that involvement opened up ripeness for and thus as I've said the involvement sets up the inner experience to seemingly have power. It's the ripeness that was already present that moved the current where it needed to be.

"Desire is a gift of God. Man is required to do nothing more than accept the gift by simply giving thanks for the unseen reality before he observes it in his outer world. Through desire, God beckons us to lift our awareness to higher and higher levels of consciousness. During our journey through this dream of life, it is necessary to experience all possible states so that we may return as God, the Father, but enhanced by having experienced both good and evil. The desire to do more, to be more, and to have more than you are presently expressing is the urge for expansion." - imagination creates reality unknown date

Well there you have it. Desire is the urge for expansion. So if desire is a pressure to expand then that clearly ties in with everything else I've said before I even read this quote.

"In the spirit world, all organized societies are personified. Rivers, mountains, cities . . everything is human, for God is Man. Even the Los Angeles Woman’s Club building is personified in the spirit world. Representing a need of the ladies who own it, when seen in the spirit world, and trying to detach yourself from it, it will curse you, for it wants to feed on you." - imagining creates 1968

The spirit world huh. Isn't that interesting.

"Take the passages I have quoted tonight and see how they relate to the visions. Each passage dwells with eschatology, the doctrine of the last days, when Man turns from this age of sin and death to that age of Eternal life.

Now this may seem a deep spiritual night to many of you, but may I tell you it is directly practical, for while you were with me this night you left all of your worries and cares of the day on the conveyer belt which is moving automatically. Your heavenly Father knows your needs and is caring for them while you travel in the spirit world with me. You have left those who are self complacent, content with their own little circle. Those who know they are right are in hell where there is no forgiveness of sin. In hell it’s all self-righteousness, all justifying oneself. One of the greatest of all human weaknesses is the necessity of always being right, and that is hell until one becomes loose enough to ask questions. Whether the truth is accepted or not is irrelevant, but when they ask, answer directly: “When you find God you are going to find yourself. And when you find the truth you will discover that you and God the Father are one.”" - eschatology the drama of the end 1968

Here we have more on the spirit world and hell. Being right all the time is what he defines as hell. That's interesting. I can actually agree with this, because in most cases being right and placing massive importance on that is caused by expectations of others and it causes dissatisfaction.

It wants to feed on you. Looks like there is "bad" things in the view of NG out there.

"We are all asunder, as every being is self, made visible. You have given yourself every individual in your world as an image, and you alone know what he represents." - fourfold vision 1968

That's another example of everyone is you pushed out.

"Now, every act of kindness is a death in the divine image for in every act you sacrifice yourself. Making alive what you no longer want to see, you die to that and live in what you want to see, so every kindness to another is a death in the divine image. By representing others to myself and persuading myself that they are as I would like them to be, to the degree that I am self-persuaded they will become it, and as they do I die to what I formerly made alive. I lived in what I thought them to be, and then I died to that thought. I did it deliberately so I laid it down myself! I have the power to lay it down and the power to pick it up again. I purposely laid my life down to what I saw and lifted it up to what I wanted to see, thereby resurrecting another (who is myself) into a new state. How often must I do it? Seventy times seven or as long as it takes me to convince myself that it is true. When I lay down my life for another he is my brother, for we have the same Father. As brothers we fall into states and resurrect ourselves into the unity of the Father!

So the greatest talent, the greatest challenge to overcome, is the art of forgiveness. By forgiveness I do not mean a verbal agreement, leaving the memory of what was forgiven. To completely forgive I must completely forget the event. No matter what was said, if you forgive me you can’t even remember what I did or said. Only willing to see what you want to see, if you persuade yourself that you are now what you want to be, you have forgotten what you were before. That’s forgiveness

True forgiveness is complete forgetfulness. Blake tells us: “The art of living is forgetting and forgiving.” If you don’t completely forgive you cannot forget, for to forgive is to change your attitude towards another, and as you change you forget what they said or did, thereby no longer keeping them in the state that compels them to do what they did! While in a state, man must play the part the state dictates, and man must play every part. God in his infinite mercy has hidden from us the parts we have played, because the shock would be too great if we were to see the horrors that we have committed as we passed through all these states. You see, when you fall into a state you can’t help but act from that premise, and you can fall into any state!" - infinite states 1968

Every act of kindness is a death where you sacrifice yourself. I can agree actually, though we need to first forgive ourselves before we can forgive another. Holding expectations of them keeps them stuck in their own conditioned state. We must transcend that expectation by accepting innate self first before we can freely represent another in the light we would then like to see them out of our own abundance of being. He also said that forgiveness is the greatest challenge to overcome. He tells us we must completely forget the event. You forget who you were before, that being that held the charge of the past response. Forgiveness is forgetting. I say it's forgetting charge, though some clients I've had told me that SP they manifested literally forgot things they revised. I don't know why they'd make that up to me. Do keep in mind though that these stories all came off the back of meaningful involvement and advanced gazing.

"While in a state, man must play the part the state dictates, and man must play every part. God in his infinite mercy has hidden from us the parts we have played, because the shock would be too great if we were to see the horrors that we have committed as we passed through all these states."

This quote from above, doesn't this necessitate that we all are forced by the promise to face suffering that's immense to fulfil the pattern? Is this not something that we are compelled to act on because of the will of God via the promise?

"So here, believe me when I tell you of my visions. They have never betrayed me, never. I might have betrayed my vision by ignoring it and encountering someone in need, not accepting what the vision is telling me to do. But it’s telling me that when I encounter anyone in my world to know I am only encountering myself… it can’t be another. Then I start it, and I represent that seeming other to myself as I would like him to be. To the degree that I persist in that assumption, then the other conforms to that state. So, here I must dream. And I think I can say tonight, I drank that cup to the very dregs. Shall I not take the cup which the Father has given me? For in the Lord’s hand there is a cup with foaming wine all mixed. Yes, I did not avoid any character in the world, I played them all, played all the characters—the white, the black, the yellow, the pink, the red. Whatever color there was, I played it. When he was honored or dishonored, I played it. I played all the characters of the world, and that I do know. So I can say, everyone in the world is playing all the characters. If you haven’t played them, you’re going to. But let me assure you because you are here—and no man comes unto me except my Father calls him— you are here, and I have reached the end of the road, and I have called you because my Father in me has called you. You play the parts too, you play them all." - love divided imagination 1967

So here he says the degree we persist in the assumption is the degree the world conforms. The degree we continue to cut through pressure to compromise and we accept ourselves is the degree to which we get what we desire. He also said the degree to which you believe in it is the degree it will conform. If belief and all this assumption stuff is stability of current then we know the answer once again. It's stemming from a firm conviction in a vision you have for your life, and maintaining that consistent pressure on playing out those visions for real will unfold them. I'd call that the law.

"Now this is the mystical meaning of a death in the Bible . . the death of Moses, a story familiar to all of us. We are told that Moses comes out of the land of Moab (Deuteronomy 34) and then scales the mountain of Nebo, goes to Pisgah, sees Gilead, and finally he looks into the promised land of Jericho. But the Lord tells him: “I will let you see the land, but you cannot go into it.” Then Moses dies. (The present state cannot be carried into the new; it has to die as a consequence of the new made alive.) “But his eye was not dim and his natural force was not abated.” And no one knows his burial place. First remember that all the characters of the Bible take place in the mind of man. I am Moses, you are Moses. It means to “lift up” or to “draw out of.” We are told in the very beginning of the story that he was pulled from the bulrushes. The word [“Moses” . . in Hebrew, “Moshe”] spelled backwards in the ancient Hebrew means “the Name” [haShem] or “I AM.” So I am drawing out of my own being, or the I AM. Moses comes from “Mo ab.” This comes from two Hebrew words meaning “Mother-Father,” or “womb.” Then he scales the mount of Nebo, which means “to prophesy,” or which represents the subjective state I long for. I will prophesy for you, or you for another. You single out a person’s longing. If he longs for something it means that he does not have it, else there could be no longing. But Moses climbs Nebo . . that is, he participates in seeing the state longed for. I single out something that implies I am the man I want to be. I scale the mountain. Then comes Pisgah, which means, “to contemplate.” I contemplate what I want to be. Then he sees Jericho, which means “a fragrant odor.” I will contemplate the desired state until I get the feeling or reaction that satisfies. I have not only scaled Nebo but I have reached Pisgah and looked into Jericho. I am filled with the emotion that implies the act is completed. Then there is Gilead, which means, “hills of witnesses.” Then I, as Moses, die. I cannot go into the promised land, and no one can find where I am buried." - the art of dying 1959

Did you catch that. "I will contemplate the desired state until I get the feeling OR REACTION that SATISFIES". It's something that's stemming from the symbolic sensory details being clear enough in their thematic composition to elicit a response, a reaction, a "feeling" which is the movement of current that IMPLIES you're now beyond limits. That's seedtime. That reaction is what the "feeling" is, and what seedtime is, and what all of this stuff he talks about it. It's a symbolic sensory experience implying something about you and that elicits a reaction. That's satisfaction, since you've reached a point of "oh this is real" but in an implication sense where what you've experienced breaks expectations. That's where the power of implication is, which NG said over and over is what holds the power and that the technique itself (imagining) has no power, and also why he said not all thoughts manifest, but the ones which elicit feeling, or reaction, or implication on self that breaks expectations and thus "shocks". I wrote about shocking yourself ages back and I've talked about this as a function of kidney heart axis and also explains why he used the "breathing method" to "work himself up" into a "state" which is a REACTION eliciting seedtime that branches out the capacitive pathway cascade of innate desire you've accepted. The acceptance of the wish being the "feeling" is the reaction, the response, the intensity of something changing, thus a "death" has occurred metaphysically.

Too bad I'm out of time for today.

31/12/25

Women will needlessly stir up drama to bring out and make sense of unconscious conditions. Men will do this too when they're heavily depleted.

Every time I feel a cool breeze I feel massively alive.

"So what I’m getting at is this, she didn’t know that the structure…you see, God’s Word is literally true, but it’s conveyed to man in metaphor, in a figure of speech. And so, the words that will convey the Word, that’s a figure of speech, that’s ___(??). So when she constructed a scene in New York City and put me on the platform to tell her story, alright, I’m telling the story… that whole structure was all figurative. What did it imply? The potency of that structure was in its implication, not the structure. She could have taken any structure in the world. But what is the structure? It implies something. It must have meaning. For the Bible is, “In the beginning was the Word.” Well, the word logos means “meaning.” It must have meaning. So there was meaning with God in the very beginning. This is not an afterthought, this is not some emergency thinking. This is something that was prepared before the world was, and this meaning was with God, and this meaning was God.

So the whole thing has meaning. So I create the structure. Now, what does the structure imply? Its implication is the word, the truth that God is speaking. So if I am telling that she has $600 now more than she had before, it means she has $1,287. Now, Neville means nothing, the platform means nothing, all these things mean nothing, it’s the implication. That’s the potency of this structure. So forget structure. It’s marvelous because it conveys meaning. And so I have to use words to convey meaning. If I didn’t have to use words, I could just think and tell you the most marvelous things in the world. But while I’m limited to this world I’ve got to find words. And all the words are figures…even a simple little thing like “imagining creates reality.” Yet behind the three little words, what am I telling you? It’s so much I am telling you in that simple, simple little thing.

So here, we have belief this night. Our beliefs, our real beliefs, are what we live by, and our entire life is the outcome of our beliefs. If, like the father in the story, as related in the 9th of Mark, thought he believed and asked the great one to help his unbelief; then he tells him in a very simple manner “All things are possible to him who believes.” Now, throughout scripture, using the word “prayer,” “Teach us how to pray,” well, there is no reaction to that. There is no statement as to how. He did give us what is called The Lord’s Prayer. That’s something entirely different…it’s the most majestic. But to teach us how to pray…they said he was praying and when he ceased to pray in a certain place, they said to him, “Master, teach us to pray.” But no statement is made as to what he said. But if you will take a good concordance and look up the words and see what prayer means, the word prayer means “motion towards, accession to, in the vicinity of”—at or in the very place that you want to be." - Our real beliefs 1966

"Well, now believe in his Word. It’s called in scripture, repentance. And so, she practiced repentance by not accepting the evidence of the senses and changing, a radical change of mind. So she didn’t have it, she’s not going to ask him for it, she’s going to try it. So in her mind’s eye she sets up a scene implying the fulfillment of her desire, and then the desire comes to pass. So that was repentance. She didn’t go to church, she didn’t go confess to some priest, she didn’t do anything in this world that the world calls repentance. Repentance means simply a radical change of mind, that’s what the word means. Metanoia is a complete radical change, not just a little change, right down to the root. I don’t know how it’s going to work, but I’m going to change radically. I’m not looking and hoping that it comes from this, that or the other; I just have it. And he’s telling my story and so I know. So she began to apply it. And when she saw me and thought now this whole thing is going to be simply farcical, it wasn’t. She didn’t realize that the power was not in the structure she had done, it was in what the structure implied." - Our real beliefs 1966

"Until he is called, he is not sent. To be called is to be sent. When you are called and sent, you know it. Not speculating you know your mission. Even though you haven’t the intelligence of the world and you are unlettered in the language of the world, he tells you what to say. You go before the learned men of the world and people you call your own and tell them what mortal mind cannot tell them. You’ll tell them what they’ll never experience by reading books or by speculating, and you tell them exactly what has happened to you. They will look upon you as one, “Isn’t he the most wonderful dreamer. Isn’t his Imagination vivid.” Isn’t so at all…you simply are telling exactly what happened to you. But they can’t see the being that you are, because on this level when I depart this world, that is, when the world sees this level, they’re the same level. They’re still clothed in mortal garments that suffer and die… until that one moment in time when, after all the furnaces, they’re called into the presence of the living God and embraced, and fused, and then sent to tell the gospel of God. And we come one by one into that state. But, here, we walk the earth unknown, completely unknown, disregarded. You’re told in scripture, he reverses the entire thing. The one that he calls and holds the highest rank he ___(??). For he sends him, sends him into the world… no honors, no background, no intellectual, social, financial background whatsoever. He sent him, but he said, I go with him, for he who sees me sees him who sent me. But you can’t see him because the eye isn’t open to see him. So I tell you, believe what I’ve told you this night. It’s true you can be exactly what you want to be if you’re willing to construct a scene that would imply the fulfillment of your dream. And the power is not in the structure, that’s all figurative, that’s mental; but the power is in its implication. What does it imply? Remain faithful to its implication and it will come to pass in what the world calls reality." - Our real beliefs 1966

Well he said it too many times to could. Remain faithful to it's IMPLICATION. Implication. Implication has the power. Remain faithful to the implication, that the vision represents for you. Every vision will have overlapping pathway cascades and some of them will need to die in order to birth the vision, thus the association is the implication, thus the implication that we remain faithful to is the expression of self beyond the expectations that bind us into lack.

Alright after some contemplation I've recognized another connection here. Listen carefully. So most people talk about "nervous system regulation" and all that stuff which is just another way of saying sinking charge really. This in itself isn't necessarily going to upend roots. What needs to be done to upend roots is to go into the heart of the implication of what's causing your reaction in the first place and "revising" it, which we know what that is, all methods are revisions. The application of this revision or tapping clear implication is directly cutting through the trash. This is how you actually drop importance, drop seeds. You literally cut through the meaning of that trash at the root and eradicate the self that responded with importance because you saw the expectation as bigger than your vision. So sinking charge in some senses when done exclusively isn't doing much other than ripening gradually towards opportunity to cut through the trash but you need to still face that pressure fully and uproot the trash. Until you get there then the condition will continue to remain important to you and you'll have those dysfunctional responses from your nervous system saying that this thing is unsafe and such. It's feeling unsafe because you've not stepped on the toes of the condition and put it in its place. You NEED kidney zhi, yang, to pull this off properly. If you're living in pseudo satisfaction then you're going to lack on this current. The yang is necessary to break down dampness and so sinking charge can cultivate yang but it needs to be moved correctly. Ripening still needs to be complete.

"Now, in this world a man who wants to be a success in business can sit down and map out a pattern (a scene) which would imply he has the success he desires. Then if he enters the scene and believes its truth, the pattern of success will unfold and the world will confirm it. But he must persist in the image of success, just as God has persisted, for the day will come when God will awaken and express the success he believes himself to be." - A prophecy 1968

So right here we have NG talking about the pattern unfolding. The pattern is the state. The desire fulfilled. Implication. Currents, supply demand.

I found some gold here. Read this. This is about patterns unfolding relating to implication.

"God destined us, in love, to be his sons through Jesus Christ according to the purpose of his will. Falling in love with his image, God entered it and became his son. Having declared what he was going to do, God does it through his pattern called Jesus Christ. Knowing what you want, when you conceive a scene that implies you have it, that objective becomes the pattern for your desire to unfold. Jesus Christ is God’s pattern, his purpose which he set forth for the fullness of time. Christ is the plan, the image God entered and made so real he claims he is the image." - A prophecy 1968

"This is the great mystery of the seed. Unless it falls into the ground and dies it remains alone, but if it dies it brings forth much. The pattern, like a seed, is planted in the earth, called Adam. The seed will take root and unfold according to its pattern." - a state called Moses 1968

"Repentance is turning around from the belief of a fleshly being called Jesus Christ, to the spirit that is Christ, the pattern man who is trying to awaken in you. Turn around by exercising your right to change your mind. Dare to believe the opposite, in spite of the facts that seem to be screaming at you. This is what I call “revision” and the Bible calls “repentance”. To revise is to repeal and if you have repealed a thing you have changed it. You can modify your concept of Christ and not completely change it by holding onto a little bit of the physical nature; but eventually you will drop it and turn around to start moving upward with the spiritual Christ, as the pattern which must unfold in all, unfolds in you." - eschatology the drama of the end 1968

"I pray this night as John did in his glorious 17th chapter, saying: “O righteous Father, the world has not known thee, but I have known thee, and these believe that thou hast sent me. I have made known unto them thy name, I will make it known that the love with which thou hast loved me may be in them and I in them.” Where can I go if I am going to the Father and the Father is in you? So when I go I will never be so far off as even to be near, for nearness implies separation. If I go to the Father and I and my Father are one, where can I go? And when I come to you it will be to unfold myself (which is the pattern) in you. Don’t look for me to come as flesh and blood on the outside, but as the pattern unfolding from within! In the end all will awaken to be the one body, the one Lord, one hope, one faith, the one God and Father of all. Returning one by one, we are that one body, one Spirit, one Love!" - same lecture

"This book of patterns will unfold in each one of us. How long it will be before the pattern unfolds in you, individually, only your heavenly Father knows. I can tell you this, however: it will happen in your old age! When you have had all of the experiences life here can give you and you seem to be barren, the child will come. That is my promise!" - follow the pattern 1968

"Now, “Jesus Christ,” what does the mind do? Go on the outside to some existent something external to yourself? Then you have failed to meet the test, for Jesus Christ is in you. Now, that Pattern has to unfold within you. It can’t unfold within you as long as you have a concept of Jesus Christ as flesh and blood." - who Paul really is 1971

That's an interesting one there. It CAN'T unfold within you if you think of Christ as literally a person. He's saying here that belief and understanding of this principle is necessary to attain immortality, but is that in principle or in effect of application? I'd say application, obviously. The belief will stem out as a result.

"This vision is God’s gift of grace, which is God’s unearned and unmerited gift of himself. In spite of the fact that you may feel you are unworthy of receiving so marvelous a gift, God so loves you he gives you his only begotten son to reveal your true identity and fulfill God’s purpose to himself. Your response to what you hear concerning the true Christ is the measure of your real faith, which deepens as the story is heard over and over again. Then you have but one consuming goal: to set your hope fully upon the grace that is coming to you at the unveiling of Christ from within you." - sharing in creativity 1968

"Seven means “spiritual perfection.” But we did not earn spiritual perfection: Fitness for the kingdom of God is the consequence not the condition of his grace. So the moment that man is called, and that is the individual, by that very call when he is embraced and has union with the Holy Spirit that fits him. Prior to that he was not; therefore, the whole is grace.

Now Paul asks the question—and this is most important—in his letter to the Romans, you’ll find this in 10th chapter, but the entire epistle to the Romans rests upon his argument for the paramount importance of faith. And by faith he means faith in the pattern, faith in God’s plan of salvation. For to him Christian preaching was preaching Christ not as a man but that great mystery that is Christ. Christ, as he defined him, is the power of God and the wisdom of God wrapped into a pattern, the pattern man, that will unfold within the individual (1Cor.1:24) And when you hear the story, your response to that something that has happened in the world of men is the measure of your faith. That kind of faith Paul is speaking of. Not that I believe I’ll get a promotion in my job or that I will get a large sum of money or that I will inherit some estate. He’s not speaking of that kind of faith. He doesn’t deny it, but the faith of which he speaks is the faith in the pattern, the faith in what he calls Christ." - the remnant 1968

That's another interesting one.

"And when you hear the story, your response to that something that has happened in the world of men is the measure of your faith. That kind of faith Paul is speaking of. Not that I believe I’ll get a promotion in my job or that I will get a large sum of money or that I will inherit some estate. He’s not speaking of that kind of faith. He doesn’t deny it, but the faith of which he speaks is the faith in the pattern, the faith in what he calls Christ."

Faith in the pattern. Faith in Christ. Let me try find more on this quote. Remember a pattern is a pathway cascade. Overlapping states.

"A Christian must have faith in Christ, God’s pattern by which he will be saved. But this is not the Christ the world is looking for. They expect some glamour boy who is beautiful on the outside. But Christ is the eternal pattern which God established in the beginning. Knowing he would fulfill his word, he came into the world, becoming flesh. And when the pattern unfolds within him, Christ has returned to the being he was before that the world was.

If you really believe in your I AMness, you must test yourself by daring to assume you are now the being you desire to be. Walk as though you were, and if this is a true doctrine, your desire will externalize itself on the screen of space. Test yourself every day, and then one day you will experience everything described in the Gospel as happening to one called Jesus Christ." - the revealer 1968

So here we have this again. So remember when NG said that even if you don't believe you can still test it and prove it? So that must mean then that he's either just saying that to get people into expansion (like he often does) or he's saying that as a contradiction because he's said many times that only until you've gotten to or near the end that you'll easily work the law. Remember. So if faith in I AM/God/Christ/pattern seed is required to make the law work then how does this apply?

"A miracle is the name give by those who have no faith to the works of faith. So the important question is not did Jesus work miracles in Galilee, but is he miraculously present, miraculously potent now? The answer we give to the second question is the only important answer, really. If we cannot give to the second question a confident and adoring yes, it doesn’t really matter what we say of the first. Is he present and is he potent now? I tell you that he is, but you must find out who he is and trust him implicitly." - works by faith not miracles 1965

So here's one.

"Now, without faith it is impossible to please God, and faith does work on this level. Everything you possess was brought into being through faith, and the glory of faith lies in its power to link us to the heavenly realm. Having heard salvation’s story, can you have faith in this divine vision (which is the gospel) in the time of trouble? No matter what happens to you, can you center yourself upon the vision? Can you believe that, housed within you as your I AMness, is the only creative power in the world? I hope so, because your faith in God is measured by your confidence in yourself." - you can never outgrow I AM 1969

Here NG talks about how ALL things require faith to exist. Faith in God? Can't be. It must be faith in the pattern, the pathway cascade of the implication and thematic composition of the vision.

The way I see this whole measure of faith in God is simply the degree of awareness you have that's ripe. Without that you cannot please God. Many of us are born with more awareness of this at baseline.

"Remember, “Every word that goeth forth from my mouth shall not return unto me void.” Do you believe it? “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”What’s his Name? I AM. So, begin to monitor every word (I AM) that you say. Do you see a pattern? Don’t the circumstances of your life reflect what you have been saying? You have been misusing the creative power that is God (I AM). Now that you are aware of what you have been doing, watch every word and make it conform to what you wish to bring into your life. Eventually, you will have faith that what you are stating, though there is no outward evidence to support it, is a fact in consciousness and will shortly project itself so that you may experience it in the outer. Knowing that God actually became you because He is I AM, you must realize that you are using your power to create every time you use that Name." - imagination creates reality unknown date

Watching thoughts is pointless, since NG himself said that not all thoughts create. It's the ones you react to, which we all know are the issues. Those hold charge, implication of lack and expectation against natural striving. Those thoughts and what they mean/imply are where the power is of seedtime.

This is Webster in his original dictionary on belief

"BELIE'F, noun

1. A persuasion of the truth, or an assent of mind to the truth of a declaration, proposition or alleged fact, on the ground of evidence, distinct from personal knowledge; as the belief of the gospel; belief of a witness. belief may also be founded on internal impressions, or arguments and reasons furnished by our own minds; as the belief of our senses; a train of reasoning may result in belief belief is opposed to knowledge and science.

2. In theology, faith, or a firm persuasion of the truths of religion.

No man can attain [to] belief by the bare contemplation of heaven and earth.

3. Religion; the body of tenets held by the professors of faith.

In the heat of persecution, to which christian belief was subject, upon its first promulgation.

4. In some cases, the word is used for persuasion or opinion, when the evidence is not so clear as to leave no doubt; but the shades of strength in opinion can hardly be defined, or exemplified. Hence the use of qualifying words; as a firm, full or strong belief

5. The thing believed; the object of belief

Superstitious prophecies are the belief of fools.

6. A creed; a form or summary of articles of faith. In this sense, we generally use Creed."

So right there we have it. A persuasion of the truth. Proposition of fact based on evidence. Evidence gives us an experience of heightened awareness which implies something is AVAILABLE. Right? Go back to my older entries and you'll hear me talking about the idea of availability being what we are moved by in belief. Belief I will say is what we will take to be true based on what's available to us based on what experiences we've had. The more I go over this again and again the more clear the language he used becomes. Being able to turn to any page of his work and decode it clearly is something that nobody seems to be able to do reliably.

So this is how I will decode persistence now, one of the many examples. Belief. Belief is a reference to a charge that a thematic composition representing an overlap of pathway cascades has which you "feel". Belief is felt. All of this is an experience of what's available or not based on integrated charge phenomena you've had which will obviously have experiences and thus "evidence" behind them. So this persistence thing is that whenever you have contrast show up that throws you into doubt you'll have in reference a form of evidence that you can draw from to negate the importance (meaning) of that thing that tried to cause doubt and so the remembrance of your vision and the higher charge of availability that's been experienced from your past either internally and or through involvement that elicits the same response, that becomes your reaction to that attempt of causing doubt. So persistence is continually returning to the evidence of the senses that should be MEANINGFUL as to dismiss the seeming importance of the trash. This means that implication through imaginal acts and involvement that moves the same current is moving charge on the importance of what would otherwise have caused doubt for you to then respond to that scenario with faith. Having faith is all about charge being at a degree of comfort to be stable and confident in your vision. The only way then to move charge that implies lack is to cut through it as I've always said. It MUST be meaningful, implication is meaning, and meaning is what moves current. That's how we overlap states and unfold the seed into the pathway cascades which will thematically come up when those forms of doubt arise. This is what all of this is doing, and remember that quote I mentioned where NG was talking about how his imaginal scene at night was for the purpose to make his thoughts conform more to the ideal in the next day? It's because it moves current and charge which thematically implies lack of the thing in your vision. Therefore your response cannot be one of lack because you don't FEEL lack. You can't under this condition, because you've seen how it's not important to you.

Obviously involvement is how 90+% of any of this works. State streaks which get you into that expansive place consistently makes magic happen.

"Tonight, when I leave this building I will ride home with my friend. As we travel we will pass certain streets and see familiar objects because we will be traveling by sight. But when I walk by faith my steps are invisible, for I will be walking in the assumption of my fulfilled desire. Paul tells us to “walk by faith and no longer by sight.” We all know what it is like to walk by sight, but now we are called upon to break that spell and walk by faith." - all things are possible 1969

"The link between your imaginal act and its fulfillment is your faith, which is nothing more than your subjective appropriation of your objective hope. Hoping your desire . . subjectively appropriated . . is true, faith is your link to its objectivity. Act as God, and simply let it be so. God said: “Let there be light, Let the sun appear. Let the moon appear.” After his imaginal act, God let everything appear, sustaining it by faith, knowing that without faith it is impossible to bring it to pass. “Faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not yet seen.” If you have faith in the reality of your imaginal act, it must objectify itself in your world." - biblical language 1969

So having faith in your imaginal act/vision is having consistent belief meaning a FEELING/charge phenomena of currents that imply availability. When you persist you're deciding to respond with availability. The way you really do that effectively as I've always said is to cut down the people who instilled the expectations and conditions that you can't be or have the thing and step on their toes. Cut them down to the ground and take your place. This is how you effectively do this, despite what most will say is reliable. I don't think seeing yourself as God or whatever will be effective for most because they're not at that degree of true faith yet and need some mediating process to get there and this one will work for everybody since it's how you ACTUALLY feel. That's how you begin overlapping the base states and gain access to higher order states for deeper faith in God.

"Since consciousness is the only cause, you cannot blame others for the conditions which presently exist nor can fate or chance be the cause of that which you are now experiencing." - imagination creates reality unknown date

Well that flies in the face of things he's said, since many experiences we have are in fact because of fate. The pattern unfolding for example, they are because of ripeness that we don't consciously believe, at least in the details. Our birth and death conditions are pre-determined as he said, regardless of what we believe. So this is a contradiction, truly. People in LOA will quote this and make the claim that it's ALL subjective but it's not because NG did talk about fixed functions that happen to us and so they'll fail to reconcile the contradiction because they can't go past the solipsistic view. I want to shred Eric and the rest of these LOA minions so bad. Tear their ignorant trash to shreds.

Wait. Read this.

"But tonight, I want to bring it down to this level of using your Imagination for everything that is lovely and loving in this world, I don’t care what it is. Your own wonderful human Imagination is God: That is the divine body that the world calls Jesus. Because you can imagine and I can imagine and we imagine, we are members of the one body, this divine body that is the Lord Jesus Christ. And so all things are possible to him; there’s not a thing impossible. So what can you imagine?—imagine anything in this world, I don’t care what it is. And experiment. Faith is an experiment which ends as an experience. But an experiment comes first. So I tell you, all things that you desire, believe that you’ve received them, and you will (Mark 11:24). That’s a challenge. I challenge you to experiment. Do you believe me? “Well, I trust you, I don’t think you would lie to me, so I would say yes, I believe you.” Then that is a measure of faith. But now it depends upon your experiment." - imagination, the real man 1968

Right there. Jesus is the body of the world. That sounds irrelevant in principle but it's very important. If Christ is a pattern, pathway cascade of all the thematic capacities we have, then the world is a composition of all of these components interacting. Therefore the world and everyone is you pushed out represents the condition (arrangement) of that Christ seed, from the top down perspective. The Christ seed (eternal states) and the "created states" as overlaps of aspects of the Christ seed all represent then degrees of those capacities in expansion that you'll experience, representing your "level" of consciousness. So the pattern, the seed, the cascade of branches and such, these are all shown in the world through HOW WE RESPOND TO IT, and thus what we believe to be true. Here I "believe" that NG is speaking of the idea that experiences are brought into our awareness effectively because we believe something (have charge on it) and thus will have to cycle through those experiences to bring that out of us to process the pressure as an effect of the Christ seed unfolding into complete ripeness one part at a time. Therefore going "through all the furnaces" is this process of cutting through all the pressure and learning the lessons and therefore the seeming law is to operate this mechanism of the seed/pattern unfolding. Remember that NG said that desire is there as a gift of God to expand. So this whole Christ is the world thing makes sense here, and in fact how it all is Christ because it really is. When you see it this way it can make sense. David can also make sense too, from his biblical doctrine, as a part of Christ that contains us within that vessel.

I see David more or less then as a sort of reality container that's part of the pattern and that the reality container which houses the proverbial alchemy lab eventually turns inside out and we look at it from within what was already there waiting to be seen, the Father. The alchemist says David is a title given to someone of a certain degree of awareness. When you can see it all as capacities, patterns, seed that contains the whole tree within it but that it needs to fully "unfold" then you'll be able to recognize all the different levels of how you can see the seed depending on the degree of unfolding that you've reached, which is faith, which is charge phenomena relative to the fixed point of comparison of that seed in its unfolding via natural striving.

"The lady who learned how to use the law saw it perfectly, too. The law operates by faith. If you believe, no effort is necessary to see the fulfillment of your every desire. If you go to the bank and have money deposited there equal to your check, you will give them your check in the belief that . . because of your faith . . they will give you the money you desire. Treat your desire in the same manner. Knowing your desire exists in your imagination, simply expect its fulfillment in your outer world. Try it. I have lived by this law all of my life and know, that by applying this principle, all of your desires will be fulfilled." - the heart of the dreamer 1969

So here NG clearly defines faith in your desire. I have quoted this before I believe. So the belief in having the cash is because of faith, and faith here is a quality of expansion and charge phenomena relative to a thematic composition. The vision would be the targeted thematic composition. It's that you feel the availability of that thematic composition given the charge within that meridian system and representative metaphysical pathway cascade. Your desire existing in imagination as he said is simply "checking" the pathway cascade to recognize what's available and what's not. When something "comes up" it's a sort or referencing or indexing of all the thematics that comprise that and their unique overlaps and running current through those pathways to establish within you the sensation/feeling/intuitive level "knowing" of what that means and what's available to you or not. If it's available you won't sink into anxiety and doubt you'll be able to reference experiences that confirm the assumption/belief and THIS IS WHY STATE STREAK IMPLIED INVOLVEMENT IS SO IMPORTANT. This is really what builds ripeness for the inner scenes to have effect by producing the conditions (again the arrangement of integrated currents) that can mediate the pressure in a meaningful way to then alter the charge and thus the faith/belief in the vision at baseline.

Every time I think I hit the bottom of the barrel of explanations it just gets deeper and deeper. I've explained it like this before but not in the same way of connecting these parts together. No wonder I couldn't make this into a coherent program for months, there's just so many factors and terms to make sense of in principle AND in effect of how they interact.

"If all things are possible to your imagination, then all things are possible to imagine! How would you act if God imagined you as you want to be? How would you feel? What would you do? Then do it. Feeling its reality, have faith in your imaginal act. Desire is your hope. Your imaginal act is your subjective appropriation of the hope you want to objectify. Now, faith is the link between God’s power and your desire. He doesn’t question your desire. He who is all creative power and know-how, simply gives it to you. That is Christ, he who is defined as the power of God and the wisdom of God.

Your assumption, though false in the sense that it is denied by your reasonable mind, if persisted in will harden into fact. You do not need to know the means that will be employed to bring your assumption to pass; all you are required to do is persist in your assumption and allow your own wonderful human imagination to give it to you.

All things are possible to your imagination. It’s up to you to provide the necessary link between your assumption and its fulfillment. That link is faith. Having assumed your desire is fulfilled, your faith in that assumption will cause it to harden into fact. That is the law. " - the nature of God 1969

Well here we have NG telling us again that feeling the reality of what you want and having faith in it are connected. The charge phenomena becomes the evidence of those thematic compositions that the vision represents. Really all that exists is the field geometry, but we have the sensory level interface that translate these currents into manifest form. So when you have faith in the assumption by assuming it's fulfilled (again another charge phenomena) then you'll have the stability of the currents on the pathways that imply availability instead of lack and stuff. So here NG is saying that the law is that the availability (or unavailability) of various currents determines what we experience, and how we respond to those experiences. The promise is the overarching process of this. I have to interpret it within his doctrine here.

"You want a job? Could you drive your car into the parking lot and occupy that space which would be yours were you the vice president, or any position you wish to occupy? Then do it mentally and do it over and over until it seems natural. Then the shadow world will rearrange itself and make way for the car in a physical manner. But then don’t forget how it happened, for then you will go sound asleep again, and then it might take you a very long time to again live by faith. When you have too much of the world in focus, you do not live by faith. How can you, if you can write a check for anything you want? Jacob is the eternally beginning one and I am called on to bring Him, and I can only do it through faith. So today, no matter what you desire, if you know that Imagination creates Reality then you can bring about a change of attitude and following this change in this shadow world around you. When you react, actually you penetrate. But when I change something within myself, I am acting, and only God acts in existing beings and men. Satan is that aspect of mind that reacts to life instead of affecting life. So do not argue but decide what you want in place of what you have or see. Until I can change a thing I can tolerate it, for I know I can change it, for when I change within, it will have to change outwardly, no matter what it is. “All that you behold, though it seems to be without, it is within, in the Imagination, of which this world of mortality is but a shadow.”" - the second vision 1959

Do it again and again until it seems natural. The naturalness is the comfort of that belief and implication for you, meaning you feel that it's available. This must therefore imply that if doing it again and again while it's NOT natural then we must face conditions and discomfort and unnaturalness until it becomes natural. So he's saying here indirectly that we will face doubt when getting to that point of comfort. I will argue though as usual that your foundational biochemistry is a good marker of what degree of availability of various currents you have to work with. I KNOW that if you're lacking in TEST for example then your ability to work this mechanism and cut through the trash will be difficult because feeling the pressure to even cut through in the first place to establish the naturalness requires that kidney heart axis to be strong. That IS where "feeling" occurs. That connection is how we determine what's available or not, at least as a primary meridian overlap. There's others as well but kidney heart is the most important for the reasons I went over in prior entries.

Now also read that further again. React. When you REACT you PENETRATE. "Penetration" metaphysically speaking, of a targeted state or thematic composition, that is a moment of heightened awareness that shifts the baseline degree of comfort of charge and establishes availability through the evidence of the senses you've experienced that IMPLIES you're comfortable with it. So here we have MORE proof of these mechanics being true. Penetration is reaction, is seedtime, is all of these things. Reaction, and that's a phenomena of the shen being moved by the currents in the meridians.

I'm literally a genius. Screw everyone in LOA who taught ignorant trash for years without competition. Imagination creates reality through the symbolic conjuring of thematic components in overlap that have implication to fixed nature and that reaction determines what you get in response via the so called law. THE REACTION MATTERS NOT THE WORD. The word should elicit reaction if it's implying what's necessary to cut through no longer matters. The words and images elicit response only through the means of implication and nothing else, that's why NG talks about implication having the power and the technique AKA imagining having "no power whatsoever". If the technique of imagining mattered, as he says all the time "imagining creates reality" then you'll clearly be able to now interpret every instance of him saying that to mean this instead, that the "psychic sexual act" is what seedtime is, where God enters into the state or thematic structure of the subconscious mind. It works. Everyone else has been wrong and I've been right this whole time. I'm a literal genius I can't believe it's that clear now. It's so obvious and these few quotes I found seal the deal. I never would've found these if I didn't spend something like 40 hours building the study tool from scratch to get this working because I KNEW I needed this and had to cut through the pressure to make it happen.

Next stage is the course. The 16k course that's going to change the game forever.

So when NG talked about "forgetting" that something ever happened, obviously means to move charge on that event. This is what we've all been doing. Nobody actually "forgets" things, as all of your experiences are uploaded to higher genius at death and all of them exist even when you're dead. So this is what's going to make sense of that. Once again, the people who interpret that at face value can't prove any of it.

Interestingly NG also said that Satan reacts. Satan reacts to life instead of affecting it, and yet he tells us that reaction causes penetration. Yeah Satan reacts but it's the charge that's dysfunctional and agitated.

"Take my words to heart and achieve your every desire. Learn to walk by faith and not by sight and, like Paul, turn your back upon everything you have ever accomplished and go forward . . by faith . . towards the goal you have set for yourself. Knowing what you would see if your goal were reached, how you would feel if you were there, what you would do now if it were true? Walk in that state and you will achieve it." - walk by faith 1967

Sounds like he's telling us to self abandon.

"All things are made by your imagination, for without imagining, nothing is made. Imagination is not limited to this level of consciousness. There are levels and levels of imagination, as your dreams and visions prove. This world is sustained by Divine Imagining, which is human imagining on a higher level. Our imagination is keyed low, but we are called upon to exercise this power, to examine ourselves to see if we are keeping our faith. On this level, faith is not complete until, through experiment, it becomes experience. Experiment with this statement: “Whatever you desire, believe you have received it and you will.” (Mark 11) If faith is not complete until, through experiment it becomes experience, you must take an unseen objective and place it in an assemblage of mental states which would imply its fulfillment. Then this desire must be activated by entering into its center, feeling its reality, and walking in the faith that it will happen. I tell you: in a way you could not devise, what you have assumed will come into your world." - your maker 1969

Right there. Levels and levels of imagination. God imagines through us. He tells us that faith necessitates direct experience that illuminates and means something important about you. That's where the implication is in power. He says that there must be an "assemblage of mental states" (thematic composition and branching overlapping pathway cascades) which we experience the implied fulfilment of to experience that externally. he then tells us again that activation here and penetration happen through feeling, charge phenomena, meaning. The intuitive level connection is that implied pathway cascade that holds charge. This is a good quote.

"Your presence here tells me you have played them all, because no one comes unto me save my Father calls them, and I and my Father are one. Your consistent attendance and your interest in my words tell me you are at the end of the play. Having played the part of the well-known and the unknown, the wealthy and the poor, the disgraced and the proud, you have played everything, as it is all contained within you. Every conceivable part is now a reality in you, but you need not activate it. You can, however, enter a state and by the simple act of assumption, activate that state, and not one power in the world can stop its response. If it takes a dozen or thousands of men and women to respond to your assumption, they will, for humanity is David . . a man after your heart who will do all your will." - all that you behold 1969

So if activation of a state and penetration of a state and seedtime and all of these things are "reactions" to life then we can clearly see here again that feeling that's elicited through the overlapping of thematic pathway cascades will bring about responses to that in the world, according to this theory NG proposes. So since David exists as a capacity within us all and David plays all the roles of the people according to NG then David acts as the world, humanity. They're moved by the state of David, a state within God, who is your capacity that this reaction mediates current through. You're playing God in extension as self and the state David representing others will mediate your pathway cascade structure into tactile experience thematically translated from the currents you "believe" in as the sensory visions and such.

"However, faith is the actual substance of that which is hoped for. It is the evidence of the thing you want which you do not see in the outer world. That which you want to do or be has already been created. Therefore, it actually does exist. It is possible to bring into your world anything in creation by your belief that you already have it. Faith that what you want is already a fact is the means by which you activate the invisible state. That state then is later reflected in your outer world. Creation is finished. God can create nothing that is not already existent. Faith or belief that you already are or have that which you desire is the only means by which to experience your desires. No limitation is imposed on that which you can have except your failure to assume possession of the quality or thing desired." - imagination creates reality unknown date

Failure to assume having the thing desired is failing to mediate pressure into satisfaction. You don't believe because you're still agitated and the seed is still conditioned before it can be activated, AKA before you can enter into the state or "penetrate" and fertilize it with the power of God, the Christ pattern which exists as all things and in which David is raising up from seed into full birth through the Father.

I've quoted this one many times but let's use it again. An assemblage of states which feeling will activate. Activation, seedtime, reaction. So it seems here that the so called law is the law of reaction and belief, therefore whatever you react to is what you believe. So when Christ says in the bible that whatever you belief you will receive, it can work under this context since that state has been activated. Choosing to react differently based on the desire to fulfil a vision for your life is working the so called law and also by extension the promise. You can't not work the law in unfolding the promise.

Websters original dictionary meaning for faith.

"FAITH, noun [Latin fides, fido, to trust; Gr. to persuade, to draw towards any thing, to conciliate; to believe, to obey. In the Greek Lexicon of Hederic it is said, the primitive signification of the verb is to bind and draw or lead, as signifies a rope or cable. But this remark is a little incorrect. The sense of the verb, from which that of rope and binding is derived, is to strain, to draw, and thus to bind or make fast. A rope or cable is that which makes fast. Heb.]

1. Belief; the assent of the mind to the truth of what is declared by another, resting on his authority and veracity, without other evidence; the judgment that what another states or testifies is the truth. I have strong faith or no faith in the testimony of a witness, or in what a historian narrates.

2. The assent of the mind to the truth of a proposition advanced by another; belief, or probable evidence of any kind.

3. In theology, the assent of the mind or understanding to the truth of what God has revealed. Simple belief of the scriptures, of the being and perfections of God, and of the existence, character and doctrines of Christ, founded on the testimony of the sacred writers, is called historical or speculative faith; a faith little distinguished from the belief of the existence and achievements of Alexander or of Cesar.

4. Evangelical, justifying, or saving faith is the assent of the mind to the truth of divine revelation, on the authority of God's testimony, accompanied with a cordial assent of the will or approbation of the heart; an entire confidence or trust in God's character and declarations, and in the character and doctrines of Christ, with an unreserved surrender of the will to his guidance, and dependence on his merits for salvation. In other words, that firm belief of God's testimony, and of the truth of the gospel, which influences the will, and leads to an entire reliance on Christ for salvation.

Being justified by faith Romans 5:1.

Without faith it is impossible to please God. Hebrews 11:1.

For we walk by faith and not by sight. 2 Corinthians 5:7.

With the heart man believeth to righteousness. Romans 10:6.

The faith of the gospel is that emotion of the mind, which is called trust or confidence, exercised towards the moral character of God, and particularly of the Savior.

FAITH is an affectionate practical confidence in the testimony of God.

FAITH is a firm, cordial belief in the veracity of God, in all the declarations of his word; or a full and affectionate confidence in the certainty of those things which God has declared, and because he has declared them.

5. The object of belief; a doctrine or system of doctrines believed; a system of revealed truths received by christians.

They heard only, that he who persecuted us in times past, now preacheth the faith which once he destroyed. Galatians 1:23.

6. The promises of God, or his truth and faithfulness.

shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect? Rom 3.

7. An open profession of gospel truth.

Your faith is spoken of throughout the whole world. Rom 1.

8. A persuasion or belief of the lawfulness of things indifferent.

Hast thou faith? Have it to thyself before God. Rom 14.

9. Faithfulness; fidelity; a strict adherence to duty and fulfillment of promises.

Her failing, while her faith to me remains, I would conceal.

Children in whom is no faith Deuteronomy 32:20.

10. Word or honor pledged; promise given; fidelity. He violated his plighted faith

For you alone I broke my faith with injured Palamon.

11. Sincerity; honesty; veracity; faithfulness. We ought in good faith to fulfill all our engagements.

12. Credibility or truth. Unusual.]

The faith of the foregoing narrative."

So here we have the same meaning pretty much as belief. Believe in him, believe in his power, believe in the pattern, the thematic currents. It makes sense. It's decoded.

"Well, facts have overflowed the world like the flood. Man actually is “drowned” with facts, victimized by facts. It is in the Imagination that everything lives, and not in its actuality, not in the fact. Unless Imagination penetrates the facts, the deluge remains a deluge. We are now in the deluge. This is the flood!" - the flood is still upon us unknown date

Penetrate the fact. Bring to life the fact, the thematic composition and charge relationship.

When it comes to having faith in the pattern it's not JUST an idea in theory but to trust inner guidance system and make necessary decisions to be satisfied in life. We detach God (activation) from things we don't want, and thus alter the subconscious mind, or thematic structure composed of the pathway cascades. The only way to do that is to accept where God is moving you, what desire is, which NG said is to expand and eradicate the feeling of dissatisfaction and suffering. To be in flow is to be one with God since you're operating from his power, unfolding the pattern of the Christ. Failure to die metaphysically speaking is the failure to allow God to shape you in necessary ways and thus manifesting desires is a death of who we use to be to become who we have capacity for that's "felt" as desire for expansion. This works the law and the promise.

"“Sin” is simply knowing what to do, but not doing it. That’s sinning. So, if I discover what to do to penetrate a fact: to go beyond the fact and create a condition for myself and dwell in it and think from it instead of thinking of it … for the great fallacy of the world is perpetual construction . . deferred occupancy, to create and create in my mind’s eye all kinds of lovely things I would like to realize but never occupy them. I do not penetrate the state and go right into it, and give it cubic reality. But I know . . and you know . . and it’s not difficult to understand why the sense of touch is something we believe in more profoundly than we do in, say, the sense of sight, or the sense of hearing, or the sense of smell." - same lecture

The thing that needs to be understood about all of this is that it's a ripeness process here we're playing with. This often isn't a one and done and that's why repeatability is impossible because it's NOT MEANT TO BE REPEATABLE. It's a "law" because it's a functional mechanism but the thing is that pressure must be cultivated and reach a certain level in order for this to work. This is what we observe. When you involve it's working that pressure in meaningful ways repeatedly to ripen the seed ready for penetration, if we'd say that. There's a certain threshold of acceptance that can only be activated fully when you've got enough vitality supply of those currents to support that integration. NG never talked about this but this is WHY persistence is even part of his doctrine and how you actually build belief. This is how things actually work no matter how you look at it, because we all observe this and experience this. The time is necessary to ripen, though with all the data I've been through there are ways to speed this up substantially.

Listen to this.

"Now, you can penetrate the fact and break it; and that’s what we are here to teach. “I come, not to abolish the law and the prophets” . . I come not to abolish them . . “but to fulfill them” (Matthew 5:17) . . and to tell you the real Law. It’s not washing your hands before meals, although that is a very nice, clean thing to do. It’s not giving certain diets, doing this, that and the other. He explains that the entire Law is psychological. He takes one of the Commandments, which is a graphic one, to show you how everything must be interpreted psychologically.

He said, “You have heard it said of old, you shall not commit adultery. But I, say unto you, any man who looks lustfully upon a woman has already committed the act in his heart with her.” (Matthew 5:27, 28)

Well, what man hasn’t? What man has not violated that? So, he tells you the whole thing is a psychological thing. You cannot restrain the impulse. You may restrain it, based upon a thousand little reasons. Maybe you are afraid of the consequences. Maybe you are afraid that someone will find out. Maybe you are afraid of this, that and the other; but the impulse was there, and he tells you the impulse is the act. Well, if the impulse is the act, then creative acts are imaginal, for it was an imaginal act; so I have to observe my imaginal acts, for the imaginal act is a fact. It’s going to actually become a fact, and then it will confront me."

"The impulse is the act". Impulse/reaction to stimulus. The charge. He says that the impulse is imaginal. The imaginal act was the reaction. Imagination therefore as I've said is NOT YOUR IMAGINAL SENSES BEING THE ONLY PERSON IN LOA TO MAKE SUCH A CLAIM. I've not only been proven correct with this quote but others which point to this as well in his works. Please do remember, I DO NOT take back what I said that he failed miserably to explain it properly. He failed to explore this language consistently and make a clear outline of all these terms I've had to search through from decades of his recorded lectures. It's ONLY because of putting together this tool that I was able to find this. No other reason, and if any other LOA buffs out there was interested in the truth above the cash like I've been since the start then they'd have done the same. I only did this because of my pursuit for perfect truth, even at the cost of personal gain. I have ALL OF THIS HERE FOR FREE, which is worth tens of thousands. Nothing else ever written compares to the insights over the last few pages of the aetheraeon notebook.

Listen carefully. If he says that a reaction that's automatic when you look at a beautiful woman that causes you to lust (which he rightfully points out that we all do myself included) then that would mean there's a condition (arrangement) that's already established that's eliciting such a reaction when the "trigger" arises, meaning there's current of unfulfilled lust that's unsatisfied. This goes for ANY current. I never needed NG to prove any of this, I'm only going through what he said because that's the expectation and I might as well play into it since then there's nowhere for these fools to hide behind ignorant nonsense when it's all out in the open. Their character is no longer supporting their view, since imagination here is seen as reaction. Here he should say "reactions to life creates reality".

Oh man I found the goldmine here. There's easily 20 quotes supporting this I've found.

Lets' go hard here because I want to nail this one in. This program is gonna be insane when I've finally got all this data.

"Now, how will I know that I have changed the feeling of “I”? By beginning first with an uncritical observation of my reactions to life and then noticing my reactions when I think I am identified with my choice. If I assume that I am the man that I want to be, let me observe my reactions. If they are as they were, I have not identified myself with my choice, for my reactions are automatic and so if I am changed I would automatically change my reactions to life. So the changing of the feeling of “I” results in a change of reaction, which change of reaction is a change of environment and behavior. But let me warn you now. A little alteration of mood is not a transformation; it’s not a real change of consciousness. Because as I change my mood for the moment it can quickly and rapidly be I would say, replaced by another mood in the reverse direction. When I say that I was changed, as that gentleman changed his mood, his basic mood, his state of consciousness, it means that having assumed that I am what the moment denied, what my reason denied, that I remain in that state long enough to make that state stable. So that all of my energies are flowing from that state. I am no longer thinking of that state. I am thinking from that state. So that wherever a state grows so stable as to definitely expel all of its rivals, then that central, habitual state of consciousness from which I think defines my character and is really a true transformation or change of consciousness. Whenever I reach that state of stability, watch my world mold itself then in harmony with this inner change. And men will come into my world, people will come to aid and they will think they are initiating the urge to help. They are playing only their part. They must do what they do because I have done what I did. Having moved from one state into the other. I have altered my relationship relative to the world round about, and that changed relationship compels a change in behavior relative to my world. So they have to act differently toward me.

For the changing of the feeling of “I” results in the change of reaction, which change of reaction results in a change of world. If you like your world and you are complacent about it, you haven’t started on the road of the mysteries, for the very first beatitude appeals to one who is not complacent. “Blessed are the poor in spirit”. You must be poor in spirit, not complacent, not satisfied. The man who thinks that by reason of birth, the religion that he inherited at birth, is good enough for me, that he is not dissatisfied, he is not, I would say moved that being is complacent and therefore he is not poor in spirit; he is very rich in spirit. Theirs is not the kingdom of God. For if I could stir you, make you dissatisfied with self, then you will recognize that self and set about to change it. For the only field of activity for man is within himself and on himself. You do not work on the other. The day you change self, that day you change your world." - changing the feeling of I 1953

So right there. The feeling is reaction, and changing the I is a change in reaction, thus an alteration of the integrated currents that determine charge when various thematic components are brought into context of mind. He talks about a state of stability, and a change in consciousness is an alteration of charge variables relating to the pathway cascades that fire. TCM explains this all too keep in mind. The way he explains it above is just like thematic supply/demand.

"Leprosy doesn’t come from without. Cancer doesn’t either. Everything is within man. Read the paper and react. That reaction sets a feeling in motion, be it anger, frustration, or irritation. When the feeling leaves, where does it go? Back to sleep within you, for you contain the world and all that is in it.

God became you and, containing all, God is absolute. The world teaches that God is all good and never evil. But if there is evil, and God is not evil, then God is not absolute.

If you can experience something that God cannot then you must be greater than God, and that is not possible. When you read of an innocent boy who was murdered and you react, you activate something within you. It may be tomorrow’s tooth or stomach ache. I do not know what it will be, but God is not mocked. As you sow a reaction you reap an act, for you and God are one." - Christmas man's birth as God 1968

There's that reading the paper and reacting. That reaction sets emotion in motion and he says that feeling rebounds. I will argue that emotions don't rebound, but what they mean does. The frustration and irritation stems from compromise on the part of that person who reacted that way, thus the implication being altered holds the power. It's interesting that he says then that a reaction that implies something will bring about further confirming experiences. If anything, this proves that implied involvement works this mechanism and can be used to work the so called law as well. That's been more than proven now. NG was just so heavily internally minded that he rarely spoke about external involvement because he mostly wanted to explore this mechanism as it pushes limits from that level. Thing is that doing it internally in a vacuum is very very unreliable because you have to work all the levers that implied involvement would afford you in an arguably easier way. Without that then you're just shooting yourself in the foot and it's going to be exponentially harder to get out especially of the bottom of the barrel. If nothing works for you then good luck using any inner work in a vacuum. The only way you'd ever be able to make progress internally is if you nourish your biochemistry well and train physically hard and provide yourself pressure this way to cut through but even that's still iffy and unreliable but at least you'd have SOMETHING to work with to provide meaning.

"So I simply heard…I did not know this technique, because my friend Bob had not revealed it…he only got it a week ago…but in my own technique I heard him tell me it was done, and I felt the emotional reaction that would accompany the thought that it’s sold, it’s all done, and that was it. Well, a week ago, as time moves towards the inevitable end, escrow is today, it’s the end today. He said to me last Tuesday before we came here, as he picked me up, “You know, we only have a week, but you told me it’s done and so I believed you…and yet I can’t in some strange way completely put aside the anxious, critical, conscious mind. It still gives me a little needle…we only have a week, and so the time is moving on…only a week.” I said, well, David, I can only tell you I stood perfectly still in my kitchen, I thought of you, and I heard you simply say to me, “It’s done! I’ve sold it; the whole thing is done!” and I got the emotional thrill that would accompany that coming from you, my friend." - creative moments 1965

NG seems so confident here. I don't know if David got what NG imagined but I do know that David ended up talking about his anxiety later in Q&A in the lecture.

"Q: First of all, thank you for the promotion. I’m only an assistant professor, but you made me an associate. I’d like to add this because I think perhaps it might help other people, it may be useful. When Neville told me the apartment was sold, intellectually I believed him, but I have always been rather a lone wolf and by myself, and I have a tendency to be word-oriented. My problem is even though I believe something like Neville saying it’s done on a mental level, one still has one’s own inner conversations…you battle. So at the beginning of last week when I was confronted with this rather negative attitude with everybody concerned, I remembered something that I read in one of the ___(??) of Virgil. I thought that this was a good thought: Virgil said that you have to remember yourself continually. I think it’s very useful if we can remember that we are an “I am” playing a part. So I realized that what I had to do in order to ___(??) was to get my own negativeness out of the way, because I could so easily have neutralized the whole thing by dwelling on inner conversations which where built on fear. I know very well had I done this that which I feared would certainly have come upon me.

So I found that for me the thing that I did was to fill every single moment of the time that I was conscious with a conscious guiding of my own thought pattern in ways that would not be negative; in other words, even at the expense of repeating phrases such as “my Father and I are one” over and over and over. This was very helpful to me, because it isn’t a vain lip service or pleading. You’re not really asking for anything but affirming something. The mind can never think of two things at once, it can only think of one thing. If you guide it by the hand, not force it, but if you guide it, you think of something which you are consciously putting ___(??), it will dwell on that, it will not dwell on anything else. I find that when I find myself ___(??), I stop, I say I am aware that is what I’m doing, I will not accept it, and I start right in again. Fortunately, Neville has allowed me to record a lot of the lectures, and I tell you, I’ve sat in that apartment house and I wore out several sets of batteries playing them over and over and over, and thinking of specific lines. I think that perhaps this might help others in order to fill the time gap which we are subjected to on this level. You have to fill it with something, so you might as well fill it consciously with something of a positive nature. I have found this was the greatest help to me, simply to guide the mind by the hand."

That's what David did. David felt the doubt. He used thoughts of God to dispel the doubt, likely because that was meaningful to him. To me that never worked, and most people it doesn't. Applying the method I've outlined extensively over the last few pages will work reliably 100% of the time for all people.

"The phone rings. This happens, and you’ve told them over and over, and your reaction may not be quite the right one, but you reacted anyway. No one heard it, but you heard it, and your Father heard it; and you are going to build your world based on exactly what you’ve done, So you watch it morning, noon and night, because you are going to “play” this part," - control your inner conversations 1971

So here we have Ng telling us that every reaction is heard by God the Father and that will build the world accordingly. Reactions are feelings and feelings have implication that determines their quality.

"The end of everyone’s world is Christ. Everyone is moving towards the fulfillment of being God Himself . . every one. And therefore the story of Christ as told in the Gospels, you are going to play it, And when He awakes within you and unfolds within you and you are Christ, and you know you are, you are going to find those who will eagerly take all that you have to say when you give them the loaves and the fish; and then this is going to happen in your life: “Do not think for one moment I came to bring peace upon earth. I came not to bring peace, but a sword to set a man against his father and the daughter against her mother and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law.”

This will happen. And then comes the conflict in the world, and he is accused of being the devil. They say, “He has a devil. Why do you listen to him? He is mad.”

But then when you who have awakened from the dream of life hear these things, you rejoice, because you know your end is near. Oh it has to take place to “separate the sheep from the goats,” and let them go back into their world and genuflect and cross themselves for luck. And then, those who can actually follow, they will follow, for “My own must come to me.”" - same lecture

Well isn't that interesting. NG here is telling us that scripture says we will face conflicts in this world, not because of what we assume but because of the nature of the world around us. Isn't that something that confirms that we don't control it all? If scripture says we will face conflicts with the people in our lives for what we know to be true, isn't that effectively a "limiting belief" of scripture? Nah it's not it's just how things are, because you don't determine how awake people are, as NG has said only the Father knows the timing of when someone awakens. You have no power to awaken someone directly, and I've never heard anyone in scripture saying this, nor do I know any references from any other texts on such an idea, nor do the discussions I've had with the alchemist elude to this being a thing either. Ng tells us to rejoice when we're called mad. Isn't that interesting. That only disproves this idea that you can avoid all discomfort using the so called law, which as NG did say it's only to "cushion the blows of life".

Just then I thought of something and had a bad reaction internally. I know what it implies and so I cut through it instantly. I know what all of my conditions mean, I just need to move enough pressure to fully revise them. On the spot I know how to disarm the importance of such conditions though and it's only possible because of the extensive pathway work I've done. I know then that levels within levels can exist for conditions. One layer reveals and you cut through and another one opens up. This is something I experience as well, and I know how to work with that as well, though it's often more difficult. There's overlapping pathway cascades that can have different thematics associated to them which you'll need to then understand implication of to cut through again. It's like a multi level implication that's got a hidden root.

Do remember that prayer I believe means to "set on fire" or something, or was that to kiss. No that was to kiss, but prayer was similar. NG mentioned the meaning of that above somewhere.

"But if you will take a good concordance and look up the words and see what prayer means, the word prayer means “motion towards, accession to, in the vicinity of”—at or in the very place that you want to be." - Our real beliefs 1966"

There it is. To motion towards something, or to be in something, in other words to direct attention or current, God. I only seem to grasp this interpretation because of my aetheric physics background that I started with before I read anything LOA related.

I might as well just reference this lecture in whole. It's actually a special written lecture from NG that was part of some "new thought" bulletin from 1953. Here in this lecture he mentions "reactions to life" over and over, at least 8 times directly and many more indirectly related using other terms.

"With so vast a subject, it is indeed a difficult task to summarize in a few hundred words what I consider the most basic ideas on which those who seek a true understanding of metaphysics should now concentrate. I shall do what I can in the shape of three fundamentals. These fundamentals are: Self-Observation, Definition of Aim, and Detachment.

The purpose of true metaphysics is to bring about a rebirth or radical psychological change in the individual. Such a change cannot take place until the individual first discovers the self that he would change. This discovery can be made only through an uncritical observation of his reactions to life. The sum total of these reactions defines the individual’s state of consciousness, and it is the individual’s state of consciousness that attracts the situations and circumstances of his life.

So the starting point of true metaphysics, on its practical side, is self-observation in order to discover one’s reactions to life, reactions that form one’s secret self, the cause of the phenomena of life.

With Emerson, I accept the fact that “Man surrounds himself with the true image of himself . . . what we are, that only can we see.”

There is a definite connection between what is outer and what is inner in man, and it is ever our inner states that attract our outer life. Therefore, the individual must always start with himself. It is one’s self that must be changed.

Man, in his blindness, is quite satisfied with himself, but heartily dislikes the circumstances and situations of his life. He feels this way, not knowing that the cause of his displeasure lies not in the condition nor the person with whom he is displeased, but in the very self he likes so much. Not realizing that “he surrounds himself with the true image of himself” and that “what he is, that only can he see,” he is shocked when he discovers that it has always been his own deceitfulness that made him suspicious of others.

Self-observation would reveal this deceitful one in all of us; and this one must be accepted before there can be any transformation of ourselves.

At this moment, try to notice your inner state. To what thoughts are you consenting? With what feelings are you identified? You must be ever careful where you are within yourself.

Most of its think that we are kind and loving, generous and tolerant, forgiving and noble; but an uncritical observation of our reactions to life will reveal a self that is not at all kind and loving, generous and tolerant, forgiving and noble. And it is this self that we must first accept and then set about to change.

Rebirth depends on inner work on one’s self. No one can be reborn without changing this self. Any time that an entirely new set of reactions enters into a person’s life, a change of consciousness has taken place, a spiritual rebirth has occurred.

Having discovered, through an uncritical observation of your reactions to life, a self that must be changed, you must now formulate an aim. That is, you must define the one you would like to be instead of the one you truly are in secret. With this aim clearly defined, you must, throughout your conscious waking day, notice your every reaction in regard to this aim.

The reason for this is that everyone lives in a definite state of consciousness, which state of consciousness we have already described as the sum total of his reactions to life. Therefore, in defining an aim, you are defining a state of consciousness, which, like all states of consciousness, must have its reactions to life. For example: if a rumor or an idle remark could cause an anxious reaction in one person and no reaction in another, this is positive proof that the two people are living in two different states of consciousness.

If you define your aim as a noble, generous, secure, kindly individual, knowing that all things are states of consciousness, you can easily tell whether you are faithful to your aim in life by watching your reactions to the daily events of life. If you are faithful to your ideal, your reactions will conform to your aim, for you will be identified with your aim and, therefore, will be thinking from your aim. If your reactions are not in harmony with your ideal, it is a sure sign that you are separated from your ideal and are only thinking of it. Assume that you are the loving one you want to be, and notice your reactions throughout the day in regard to that assumption; for your reactions will tell you the state from which you are operating.

This is where the third fundamental, Detachment, enters in. Having discovered that everything is a state consciousness made visible and having defined that particular state which we want to make visible, we now set about the task of entering such a state, for we must move psychologically from where we are to where we desire to be.

The purpose of practicing detachment is to separate us from our present reactions to life and attach us to our aim in life. This inner separation must be developed by practice. At first, we seem to have no power to separate ourselves from undesirable inner states, simply because we have always taken every mood, every reaction, as natural and have become identified with them. When we have no idea that our reactions are only states of consciousness from which it is possible to separate ourselves, we go round and round in the same circle of problems, not seeing them as inner states but as outer situations. We practice detachment, or inner separation, that we may escape from the circle of our habitual reactions to life. That is why we must formulate an aim and constantly notice ourselves in regard to that aim.

This teaching begins with self-observation. Secondly, it asks, “What do you want?” And then it teaches detachment from all negative states and attachment to your aim. This last state, attachment to your aim, is accomplished by frequently assuming the feeling of your wish fulfilled.

We must practice separating ourselves from our negative moods and thoughts in the midst of all the troubles and disasters of daily life. No one can be different from what he is now unless he begins to separate himself from his present reactions and to identify himself with his aim. Detachment from negative states and assumption of the wish fulfilled must be practiced in the midst of all the blessings and cursing of life.

The way of true metaphysics lies in the midst of all that is going on in life. We must constantly practice self-observation, thinking from our aim, and detachment from negative moods and thoughts if we would be doers of truth instead of mere hearers.

Practice these three fundamentals and you will rise to higher and higher levels of consciousness. Remember, always, it is your state of consciousness that attracts your life.

Start climbing!" - fundamentals 1953

So when you read this and interpret it using RS then you'll figure out what it all means. Also I had this come into my head again and again. I don't have the reference for this but I KNOW I've heard it before from some audio lecture. He mentioned something about needing a "strong desire" or something very similar to make this work. I agree 100%. You need to have pressure and ripeness ready to explode. Without that then you're not ripe, This ripeness matters for success to happen. Anyway NG said that our reactions to life form our secret self, the subconscious aetheric field geometry which we swim in. This is correct, where we hold charges on the pathway cascades is the secret self that operates unknowingly. This is the "unconscious mind" in effect, viscerally speaking about "motor response". In essence through self observation we are doing pathway work, and thus mapping these reactions out is what I do with written pathway work to target aspects of our psyche which hold these reactions as excess charge, or as you could also say, unresolved conflicts. It blows my mind how many people don't get this. I know so many when I said that shut down. Poor foolish LOA followers. Need a wakeup call.

"Having discovered, through an uncritical observation of your reactions to life, a self that must be changed, you must now formulate an aim. That is, you must define the one you would like to be instead of the one you truly are in secret. With this aim clearly defined, you must, throughout your conscious waking day, notice your every reaction in regard to this aim.

This part of his lecture is very clear actually. He basically says that the imaginal self is the invisible secret self that reacts. It's so much easier to interpret "imagination" correctly using this term, instead of how he's used it later on which in my opinion is really bad. Using imagination is such a vague term. So NG says that our state of consciousness is determined by how we react to something, and that determines if we have it or not, meaning are we comfortable towards it, is it feeling available to us. If you're agitated then you'll not feel it's available, at least not clearly. I'll argue that you can be agitated and still get it but that's not for this talk in terms of the details of how that would work, which mostly comes down to mediating pressure and fixating on a vision no matter what.

"If, for instance, you had gone to an interview for a job you truly wanted but later learned that someone else was hired, you can revise that news to make it conform to what you wish you had heard. If you react by feeling depressed or assume any other negative attitude, you will then experience the same type of rejection in the future. Your reactions, whether positive or negative, are creative of future circumstances. In your imagination, you can hear words congratulating you on getting a wonderful new job. That imaginal act now goes forward and you will encounter this pleasant experience in the future." - imagination creates reality unknown date

I will say that this reaction is only a cause of what's already there in this case relating to the job. When he's talking about your reactions causing events, I see it more so as what's at baseline available to you thematically is what you'll get, which we can prove in all cases and that person will have reactions that will confirm this. He says that positive experiences will cause positive things. I will argue that if you're doing this in a sort of cope-tastic way that's not meaningful and alters your baseline state that you'd have reactions from then nothing positive will happen.

"As you review your day, it is important to revise each negative reaction so that you can remember it as what you wished had happened rather than storing that memory as it did occur. What you think of with feeling or emotion is an actual fact. That which you experience in the physical world is merely a shadow, reflecting the reality of your imaginal activity. Therefore, when you revise a conversation, an unhappy experience, or a quality about yourself, you are literally experiencing it in reality (your consciousness). The outer world is a delayed reflection of the inner and is confined to a dimension of space where events occur in a time sequence. Revision, then, literally changes the past. It replaces what occurred in the outer world with the revised version. The revised scene then gives off its effect by going forth to change future events." - same lecture

What you think of with feeling is a fact. Therefore determining the facts of life is to be clear of charge that implies lack because it won't cause you to waver in your belief. I've got a graphic that just flashed into my head then. Need to write it down.

"So, he’s taken now in Spirit into the temple. The parents bring the Christ child, for he is now eight days old and they bring him in to do for him according to the law. Simeon takes the child into his arms and lifting him up in his arms he blesses God. Then he said, “Lord, now let they servant depart in peace, according to thy Word; for mine eyes have seen thy salvation” (Luke 2:30). Then he said, “Behold this child is set for the fall and the rising of many in Israel; and for a sign that shall be spoken against, for he shall unveil, or reveal, the heart of all” (2:34,35). Your reaction to the story as told will reveal where you stand in the great play. Now, here is the child, it comes in, and he has been promised that he would not see death before he saw the Lord’s Christ. The Lord’s Christ which means “the birth of God in man” is symbolized in the form of a little child, which we will now celebrate in a couple of weeks. It isn’t any child—that is only the sign—this is set for a sign, as we are told. It repeats itself throughout scripture: “This shall be a sign unto you, you shall find a babe wrapped in swaddling clothes and lying on the floor”…that’s where you find him. But that is only the sign of an event that has taken place. What is the event? That engrafted Word has erupted, and the whole thing is now unfolding in the one in whom it has erupted… expanding forever in the bosom of God, the very God that created the universe and sustains it. And when he expands and expands, he is that God. But not until the Word has first been implanted within him. It takes root and then in the fullness of time it erupts." - imparting and implanting the word 1967

"So here, we have belief this night. Our beliefs, our real beliefs, are what we live by, and our entire life is the outcome of our beliefs. If, like the father in the story, as related in the 9th of Mark, thought he believed and asked the great one to help his unbelief; then he tells him in a very simple manner “All things are possible to him who believes.” Now, throughout scripture, using the word “prayer,” “Teach us how to pray,” well, there is no reaction to that. There is no statement as to how. He did give us what is called The Lord’s Prayer. That’s something entirely different…it’s the most majestic. But to teach us how to pray…they said he was praying and when he ceased to pray in a certain place, they said to him, “Master, teach us to pray.” But no statement is made as to what he said. But if you will take a good concordance and look up the words and see what prayer means, the word prayer means “motion towards, accession to, in the vicinity of”—at or in the very place that you want to be.

Well, she wants to be in that place hearing her story. She got right into it. It’s all communion with self; it’s not on the outside. You don’t really pray here or pray in a church. It’s when you actually withdraw from the outer world. and go within, and then get nearer and nearer to the wish fulfilled. Well, I have to get nearer and nearer to the wish fulfilled…so I assume the feeling of the wish fulfilled and give it all sensory vividness, all the tones of reality, everything that would be real were it true. So I am hearing his voice. I hear… and now what is he saying, what does it mean, what does it imply? It implies that I have it. Well, then it awakens in her the reaction of having it. Believe that you have received it—it produces that feeling of having received it. That’s the end of the prayer: “Whatever you desire, when you pray, believe that you have received it.” Well, how to persuade myself that I have received what at the moment reason is denying and my senses deny? I use all this technique, and the technique is all figurative. Has no power whatsoever. It is what it is implying." - Our real beliefs 1966

Communication with the self is communication with the subconscious field geometry, the pathway cascades, to explore the fractal field geometry of your psyche.

"A. Just as concrete. Man creates unwittingly just as well as he does wittingly, but in this world of ours we should learn to create consciously. But I can’t deny that the so-called unconscious creation is just as effective. We walk the earth, we see a headline, we don’t know the people involved, and we react. That reaction, felt intensely, was a creative act on our part. And we don’t know the people at all. So if you do it wittingly or unwittingly, it is still creative. Therefore, become aware of what you are doing. Or I can say to everyone, become more and more aware, so that at all times you are selective. You and I would not go into a store and say, “Give me a tie.” We select it. I say, “Don’t just bring me three ties. Let me see some ties” . . fifty ties, a hundred ties, and I pick out one. I may pick out two. I don’t go in and say, “Give me a suit.” “Let me see some suit lengths.” And from maybe a dozen or more, I select one . . texture, color, what I think I need in my wardrobe to augment the wardrobe. So, I pick it out and he makes it for me. I don’t let him tell me what I should want." - power 1968

Here we have NG telling us again that reactions no matter if they're consciously done or not have the power for seedtime.

"So now let us now analyze what I personally mean by seedtime. If everything is finished and completed, then why the promise there shall be seedtime and harvest as long as the earth remains ? Now seedtime, to those who are here this morning, as we should really know, we are not taking it literally, our seedtime is that moment in time when you and I react to anything in this world. It may be to an object, it may be to an individual, it may be to a bit of news that we have overheard, but the moment of reaction, that emotional response, is our attitude. Our attitudes are the seedtimes of life, and although we may not remember the seedtime or the moment of response, nature never forgets, and when it suddenly appears in our world, that suddenness is only the emergence of a hidden continuity. It was continuous from the moment of reaction until it appeared in the world.

If man could only remember these moments of seedtime, he would never be surprised when the harvest appears in his world. But because he has no memory as to that moment in time when he dropped that seed, which is simply his emotional response to something he contemplated, something he overheard, something he observed, at that moment the thing was done; he didn’t have to labor to bring it to harvest . . he simply encountered it as something already full grown, so he reaps now that on which he bestowed no labor, outside of choice. He selected it by his attitude, by his reaction." - seedtime and harvest 1956

Again, reactions are seedtime, are states being activated, states being compositions of thematic currents that hold an associated charge and thus meaning. Remember when NG said in fundamentals that 2 different people can react differently to the same stimulus and that determines their difference in states of consciousness? Same thing, clearly.

"All you need is time and you have it, it’s now. All you need is the thought, that’s money. So instead of spending that now, and spending the thought in the now, invest it now, for your now, this very moment as I stand here and I will get off the platform in a little while . . and you will think, well now this is gone, he’ll come back next year . . this is not gone. What I am doing now is not going to slip away; it’s going to move forward and embody itself as a condition, embody itself as the circumstance of my life. So that my now’s, my reactions to what I am hearing and saying and seeing, all of my reactions are in the now, and my reactions are spelling out my tomorrow. So I will repeat it . . through the doorway of now . . because he said, “I AM the door”, I AM is always first person present. Not I was the door, or I will be the door; “I AM the door,” “I AM the resurrection,” so what I do in the present, now, is not going to recede, it is going to advance into my future for through the door of the present, of the now, all time must pass. Now don’t spend it as it passes; as it passes through the door of the now, invest it. Every moment of your life see that it is a positive, constructive, noble moment. I promise you a wonderful, healthy, radiant future if you will invest the now." - sound investments 1963

"That which ye sow ye reap. See yonder fields! The sesamum was sesamum, the corn Was corn. The Silence and the Darkness knew! So is man’s fate born.

So when I reap these things in the world, I may deny it and try to argue my way out of it, but it confronts me and there it is. It would not have been brought into the world were it not planted as it was planted, because there it is, there’s the fruit. And so if today I am unwanted by the world, sometime in the past I must have felt very sorry for myself and felt unwanted. I feel they should really want me, because I had been so kind to them in the past. After all my kindness, this is what they do. Then I feel a reaction, then I feel unwanted. That’s what nations do, individuals do, families do . . don’t you do it! Do God’s law. God’s law is no respecter of persons. He doesn’t care whether you are an American or Russian or Chinese or African. He made all and he is sunk in all and the same law operates in all." - summary 1963

Here's NG telling us that our reactions of such nature cause unwontedness. I can't say this is always true, from experience. There are instances where people receive love when they don't feel they deserve it, though those people who don't feel they deserve it won't feel free to accept and receive even if it's right in front of them. These examples you'll find everywhere in life which seemingly would contradict this law, though what I know is that the inner experience of that person will be of lack still and they will likely end up in dysfunctional relationships in that case.

So here we have the emotion that implies the act is completed. I will contemplate the desired state (targeting the themes) until I get the feeling or reaction that satisfies. Satisfies here means that you've moved pressure into release in a meaningful manner, else the implication of lack still lingers. This is what pseudo satisfaction keeps you stuck with.

"I do not wait for signs to appear; it is when I am most aware of my restrictions and feel the pressures, then is when I must learn to die. I must learn to let go of what my senses dictate and “go mad” and yield to what is only a dream. But sustaining it and living in it, I die to what was physically real as I gradually lift up what was only the dream. You knew only the frightened man and not the other one. No one can tell where the other has gone." - the art of dying 1959

This right here is a very telling quote. Right here is the gold of NG. I wouldn't have found this if I didn't read on. Keyword searching still didn't pick this one out for me. He says that we must learn to let go and "go mad" as he says and yield to the dream, the vision. We accept ourselves through the letting go of implication against accepting our dream. Here we die, the art of dying is even the lecture title. Very fitting. This here tells us that letting go is a part of it, and he literally tells us here we feel pressures and restrictions and he said "this is when I must learn to die". He's literally telling us here to "let go".

Man I need to make vids on this stuff. There's just so many quotes.

"So, the changing of the feeling of “I” is a selective thing because unnumbered states are infinite states, but the “I” is not the state. The “I” believes itself to be the state when it enters and fuses with it, so he was presented with a state and without the faculty of discrimination in his youth, he fused with the state and believed these restrictions were true, and it took him three years to disentangle the “I” from these fixed ideas with which he had lived for so many years. Now you may take only a moment or you, too, may take your three years. I can’t tell you how long it’s going to take you but I’ll tell you this much. It can be measured by the feeling of naturalness. You can wear a feeling until it’s natural. The moment the feeling becomes natural, it will begin to bear fruit within your world." - changing the feeling of I 1953

Well this right here puts it into perspective. You can almost relate to this. He tells us here that we adopt childhood "restrictions" and we "fuse" with them since we lack "discrimination in youth". Sounds just like childhood trauma doesn't it. I just feel so much elevated current doing this right now because it's like I'm in that breakthrough sensation again, I already knew this but it's like finding these quotes from NG put all the doubt to rest because it's coming from the horses mouth and nobody can say otherwise. I could totally embarrass the whole LOA space with this. Playing half in half out vs going all the way with this is such a delicate balance it's insane. Can't cross too hard on either end, because of the fragile feelings of the people who watch these videos.

"I trust that you will find tonight’s message a very practical one, because today there are so many reading the paper and believing what they see and what they hear on radio and TV about the depression and the recession and this, that and the other. Now tonight let me tell you Who-You. . Are. We are told in Scripture . . this is the 19th chapter, the 26th verse, of Matthew: “With God all things are possible.” Then we are told in the earliest Gospel, the book of Mark, the 9th chapter, the 23rd verse: “All things are possible to him who believes. ”Divine Imagining has no restrictions placed upon it. Human imagining has one restriction placed upon it to believe. “All things are possible to him who believes.” So they equate man . . he is speaking of you with God, but on this level it is believing. Can you believe it? There is no other limitation, other than man’s capacity to believe what he has imagined. “All things are possible to him who believes.” So, the only restriction placed upon man is his ability to believe what his reason, what his senses, deny . . that’s all. No other restriction." - if you really can believe 1970

So here he talks about divine imagining and human imagining again, though he doesn't mention intensity. He's said that intensity is the difference between them in the other quotes, and so belief in unrestricted capacity must be this "intensity". I've talked about this before where I said that intensity is like your degree of "closeness" to God and the capacity that's available to you as a result.

Getting real with how you actually feel is going into the implications that are binding you into unavailability directly and with that pressure felt you "let it go" and die to it, meaning in RS terms you "cut through it" as I say. Same idea.

"Meanwhile, you take what I’ve told you so far concerning the Law, and apply it. Apply the Law. Your dreams, may I tell you, are most encouraging . . most encouraging. One who saw her husband encased in all kinds of limitations from the hips down, and before her eyes they all began to crack and break and fall apart, and then he jumped and danced for joy. So, take it just as you saw it. He is released; he has been freed from the restrictions, whatever they were, in the immediate present . . completely freed. And many of you have these wonderful experiences. Another one who sits next to her tonight, she had the dream of a wedding, and I was the only one . . seemingly . . that they would discuss. I sat to her right at a very long table, but across the table, and they all wondered why Neville is here, because this was a Jewish wedding. And yet, she knew that I was going to give the main speech of the evening. “Why is he here?” And so, I spoke in my own tongue, but each man heard me in his own tongue wherein he was born. And those who thought because they were all Jewish, that they would not accept me . . all but one accepted me. The one who was controversial in the beginning . . he didn’t understand one word that I said, but all the others that he thought would not accept me . . well, I thought that was the most marvelous vision that she had." - the mystery of Christ 1971

Here we have another example. A pretty basic one but it's there.

"And many of them, one after the other . . one has had one. I will tell her now from the platform that she and her husband . . In her dream, she saw a snake . . a rattlesnake, and the husband said, “I must take off the rattlers first,” so he began to take off the rattlers, and she handed him a hammer to beat it and to beat the snake to kill it. And in beating it, she awoke.

Now, that is a different kind of a dream. That’s a symbol of sex. You cannot crush out sex on this level. It has to be something entirely different. You don’t crush it out. You start to crush it out, and strange, peculiar dreams will possess you. It has to be transcended in the most normal, natural manner. It’s not really transcended until you ascend into Heaven. That comes when your body is split from top to bottom, and you . . like a fiery serpent . . ascend into Heaven. When you see that golden, liquid light at the base of your spine, after your body is severed in two from top to bottom, and you see that pool of golden, living, liquid light, and you fuse with it and you become it, and like a fiery serpent, up you go into Heaven, and you take it by force. You take it violently.

Now the energies that went down into generation are now reversed up into regeneration. But while they are still down, if you try to kill it, as many people do, from the early church members of the Catholic Church . . his name was Origen. He had himself castrated, that he would not be tempted by the women that he was teaching. He was one of the true early fathers of the church. He was born . . or, rather, he died one hundred years before Augustine was born. That’s how early he was. He came in the Second Century A.D.; and he was one of the moving spirits in the formation of the early church, which was the Catholic Church. And you read the story in the Encyclopedia Britannica. His name was Origen, and he castrated himself that he may not be disturbed when he had to face women and teach them the mystery of Christ. But he still could not cut it out that way. You can castrate the man, or woman, but it will still be in his imagination, and his dreams will still be of that nature. So, you cannot hit it and kill it. It’s simply something that leaves you by a reversal of energies. It turns from generation into regeneration.

Let us now go into the Silence." - same lecture

This one right here is much deeper though. There's some alchemical symbolism. He's clearly talking about the lesser conjugation. The alchemist has talked about it almost just like this about how he experienced this. I don't know anyone else who's had this experience, but when you access heaven it's through this process. Heaven isn't the complete end of the line either still.

"So when He appears before you, you are set free. So this is the Son revealed. Now you dwell upon it. Don’t try to force it into something. You “die” to all your former beliefs as you awaken to the truth.

If man insists on holding onto the little things . . the traditions of men, then he denies God. Blame no one. We are all born into the same restrictions. I was born into a restricted environment, believing in the historicity of scripture; believing that these characters lived; and all of a sudden, like Paul, . . Paul could say, “From now on, I regard no one from the human point of view; even though I once regarded Christ from the human point of view, I regard him thus no longer.” (Second Corinthians 5 :16, Revised Standard Version) He was speaking of the characters of scripture . . not you, not me, but the characters of scripture; and he saw them all, not as human, but as personifications of the eternal states of the spirit through which man must pass, as he comes to the very end; the climax of it all as Jesus the Father, who is God the Father. And if he is a father, there must be a son, or he is not a father; and the Son is what He brought forward, . . His anointed One called David.

Now you take it and dwell upon it; and may I tell you, you will not in eternity disprove it. No one will disprove it. I am not speculating; I am not theorizing. I am sharing with you my own personal, mystical experiences. It is true. There is only God in the world and His Christ; and His Christ is what He formed within Him, having experienced humanity, . . coming right down into the world of “death” and taking upon Himself the cross of death, which is man, and playing all the parts; and coming out at the very end. And what He brings out . . and only as He brings it out will He ever awaken from it. He could not awaken from the dream until He brings forward the image of Himself and the image stands before Him, and it is His Son, and the Son is David. So He has been seeking for David, and cries out in the 89th Psalm : “I have found David, …. and he has cried unto me, ‘Thou art my Father, my God, and the Rock of my salvation.’” (Psalm 89 :20,26)" - the son revealed 1969

So more here of depth. He says we die to all that we use to believe, among other things.

"Why are you weak? Why are you limited in this little garment of flesh? Because of God’s incarnation. He is not pretending he is in a human body. God had to empty himself of all that is he. Though he was rich he became poor, that by his poverty you may become rich. His incarnation is a complete embodiment wherein He took on all of the limitations of human knowledge. Incarnating myself in a little time slot called 1905, I took upon myself all of the beliefs that are related to that time. Born a Caucasian under the British flag I adopted the American flag. These are my restrictions. The beliefs I inherited as a Britisher and adopted as an American were woven together within this time slot, and they are all limited. In order to make them real I had to make it a complete incarnation. If I did not it would not be a real incarnation and only a masquerade, and God is not masquerading in this world. You completely emptied yourself of your true identity to take upon yourself the limitations and restrictions of this world. And while you are here, God’s pattern unfolds from within and you discover that you are He." - the tree of life 1969

More on restrictions and yielding. Yielding is letting go of course, dying, accepting truth and dropping the charge since you see through the importance via illumination of God.

"Well, what did Charlemagne do? You can go back to Constantine… alright, you’ve accepted Christianity as a fact, that’s Constantine. Then you go to Charlemagne, would you defend him, because all of his battles were against the so-called infidel who would destroy Christianity. There was a war all over the vast land of Europe. And then comes the last one, Luther. Well, who was Luther? What is the state? We know he was a man. They burned him at the stake for doing what he did, and yet Blake treats Luther as a state. What is that state? When you break all restrictions, all organizations within your mind’s eye that would completely confine you to an ism; when the whole thing gets upon you so thick that you can’t stand it and you see the chicanery behind, the whole thing becomes an organized political setup in the name of religion and you can’t stand one moment of it, and then you burst through the bridges as it were. Then it starts all over again…but you have escaped." - twenty seven heavens 1965

Here NG talks about all the labels as boxes and restrictions. Can agree.

"A: Abdullah? Lived to be over a hundred and had one consuming desire, to put the body back where he picked it up which was in Ethiopia. The last time I met Abdullah was about eight years ago in New York City. About seven years ago I met his secretary and she voiced that request of his, and said he was planning to return to Ethiopia. I haven’t seen or heard from Abdullah or the secretary since. I know he’s gone from this sphere. I know now that when I see him he is wearing his primal form, which is completely under the control of his imaginative power. It was Abdullah who first taught me how to “die,” like he said to me back in 1933, “You will die but not surely die.” Well, that seemed like so many idle words that I would die but not surely die. And he was telling me the great truth that I could not at the time grasp. Because when he told me this I was a strict vegetarian, teetotaler, celibate; I was everything that did nothing…that was Neville. Whatever man would do normally I didn’t do it; therefore, he said to me, “You know, you’re so good you’re good for nothing.” And then he said to me, “You’re going to die.” So I went to Barbados, still all these restrictions, and I came back from Barbados three months later and I hadn’t one restriction on me. And I can’t tell you to this day how it happened—came back drinking wine and liquor and enjoying it. Tried to smoke, couldn’t enjoy it when I tried it. And all the others that I tried I enjoyed. And so, that was my Ab. And he would always say to me, “The brothers came last night and what the brothers told me to tell you”—always referred to the divine society as the brothers. He really took it in the most wonderful manner: “Our Father,” therefore the fatherhood of God would imply “our Father” the brotherhood of man. And so, the exalted men—made to have gone through this vale of tears, which is called death, and resurrected from it—are part of the divine society, therefore, the brothers. And he never referred to them in any other way than the brothers. The brothers told him I was coming and I was late." - who are the condemned? 1964

Abdullah must've died before this point since NG said that "he lived". Isn't that also interesting that NG said he couldn't tell you how he did it, how he let go? He's never actually given a personal explanation of WHAT he did, other than imagine sleeping in Barbados. He even said he went to Barbados physically with all these restrictions still in place and when he came back he had none. He must've let them go while he was there or something.

"And the reason why I was late, the man who suggested to me that I should go there to hear him was a man that I didn’t trust at all. He went to Fordham University in the hopes of becoming a priest and he flunked in his third year. His father was a rumrunner in the days of prohibition, and died and left him an estate, the only child, of two million dollars. And he proceeded to lose the entire two million in the first year on Wall Street. So I had no confidence in his ability to do anything. So when he told me he met a man that I really must hear, I postponed and postponed and postponed the going. And one day I ran out of excuses, and it was a Sunday evening, and he said, “Now you have no more excuses. I know you have no dates, so come with me.” So I accepted. Ab was just about to start when I went through the door and so I took the first chair, not to disturb the twenty who were present. Ab was sitting in a huge, big chair, and he came right over, called me by my name, he said, “Neville, you are late, you’re six months late.” So I was stunned. The man knew my name and could tell me that I was six months late. And it was about six months before that that David, his name was David (??), asked me to come and hear a man called Abdullah. And from that day on I never failed, I was with Ab daily. (??) but I can’t, I have to pay rent here. But he would never take a dollar from me." - same lecture

Just more here. Also do keep in mind there's 269 matches for the word "Barbados" in search.

"Shortly after his visit my family sailed to Barbados, where we remained for three months. When we returned, my brother-in-law and sister came for dinner and this is the story Sam told me. Three weeks after our previous visit he attended a meeting on Wall Street. After the meeting was over a man he had known for years came over to him and asked if he would consider leaving the bank and joining him. He then quoted a salary which was twice what Sam was presently making, as well as promising him a five week paid vacation every year. Well, Sam was stunned beyond measure. He went home, discussed the offer with his wife, and they agreed it was a marvelous opportunity. That day he began his investment career representing the Rockefeller brothers . . not the foundation, but the five brothers and their sister. He never bought stock, only suggested it. One day he told me he worked with one portfolio for $394 million, and that’s just one of many! Sam remained there for eight years, leaving to become a junior partner in a brokerage firm." - whom do you seek 1968

Isn't that interesting. Rockefellers. The same family that admitted to being parasites who conspire against us in secret and wanting to kill humanity as a virus when they return. Remember that the Rockefellers funded the school system that pushed all the false sciences. Juize fund all false doctrines and cause chaos. Here's NG telling us that "Sam" got into an investment career (very lucrative in those days) for the Rockefeller bros. Juize always make money show up out of thin air, as we all know. Isn't that interesting though, how these people "get" their money? It's never out of thin air, or at least very rarely, in principle the way we'd think of "free" money. You'd involve in SOMETHING that would bring that about, though it would come to you as opportunity when you're in the right state. That's what I said in my implied involvement video and made it very clear.

"Man never learns his lesson. I can remember prohibition well. I came to New York City in 1922 and remained there until 1952, so I know New York City well. Old man Rockefeller, the one who really made the fortune, owned about six blocks between 5th and 6th Avenue. His entire family occupied one block on 54th Street. Before Radio City was built, he owned and rented out the two. . and three-story buildings there. One day his son said: “Do you realize that all of those buildings are speakeasies?” Here was a Baptist . . who gave millions for the dry campaign . . renting houses to be used as speakeasies. So you see, you can blind yourself to anything." - biblical language 1969

Yeah the Rockefellers funded speakeasies, what a surprise. Then he goes on to talk about prohibition since apparently there was bans on these places.

"I tell you: prohibition is stupid. You can educate a man out of a state, but you cannot prohibit him from occupying it. If I told you I would give you the earth if you would not think of a monkey for the next 24 hours, I would keep my earth, for you could not do it. Every commandment that is negative will be broken, for “God has consigned all men to disobedience that he may have mercy on all.” The moment I give you a command that is negatively worthy, I have consigned you to disobedience. There is only one commandment which is not negative. That one is “Love thy father and mother.” Every commandment has to be broken, yet man thinks he is so holy."

There's the context.

"Q: These worlds within worlds that you spoke of tonight, are they still all part of this world we’re living in?

A: Yes, my dear. This is the most important world. This is truly the world of death. Others, yes, they are, but this is the world of death. This is the world that really smells to high heaven to which God had to descend to reach the limit of opacity and contraction. You are blessed to be here. You know why? There are unnumbered waiting to get through. And we are passing bills for abortion and to limit population explosion instead of using our Imaginations to find the way to feed infinite numbers. We can do it! I heard George Washington Carver…the year he died he spoke in New York City at the Waldorf Astoria. Now he gave us the peanut butter, he gave us the peanut oil, he gave us something like 700 by-products of the peanut and the southern pine. He addresses the body of men, all great scientists, educators, publicists, all these intelligent, fine men and women, he said, “Ladies and gentlemen, we in America using only the southern part, south of the Mason-Dixon line, we could feed and clothe the entire world from the by-products”—which he called the third-kingdom.

Feed and clothe the entire world! No, our economy does not allow it…and so you stop them. Well, I have a little news for them they aren’t going to stop them. They aren’t going to stop them coming in with all the pills in the world. I haven’t seen where Rockefeller, who wants to become President, he has stopped it. He got a second one when the first one stopped producing. So he is going to stop others from doing it? You aren’t going to stop it. That impulse is the beginning of the impulse that started in the beginning, and you aren’t going to stop it. When someone says now they’re going to stop it, they haven’t overcome it. Nature has outlawed it, they’ve grown too old. They want to pass laws because they are impotent, so, they’re going to pass laws. Well, let them pass laws from now ’til the ends of time, they aren’t going to stop it. Unnumbered are waiting to come through into this world, which is the limit of contraction. This is the limit; there is no more contracted state then here, no more opaque state than here. You are blessed to be here. If you come in here and you are warped, you are blessed. If you come in here blind, you’re blessed. Without arms, you’re blessed just to be here. This is the limit of contraction. They’re coming through and no one’s going to stop them."

Well isn't that interesting he's talking about THIS world being important. NG said we're BLESSED to be here, because "there's unnumbered WAITING TO "GET THROUGH". Surprise, this is a fixed world. He says that THIS world is the world of death and that other worlds aren't this world of death, which means that this world isn't the underworld where we observe the "restored to life" thing. This proves what I was saying before. When he sees people die and be "restored to life" he's seeing them enter the underworld through his own lens that overlays what sensory details manifest to him when he sees them. It's like how different cultures all have different characters as symbols for principle thematic archetypes, even though the power is the same but since they're interpreting the sensory details differently then they see that God that another culture would see differently, despite seeing the same God. I'm glad I found this, because it's only confirming EVERYTHING I've said before from study in other systems.

He is on the ball, though you'd never figure that out if you don't have this study tool that I have. I will by the way be selling this study tool for a fair sum in the near future. I've found a lecture I didn't have added to it this morning that I found when searching for another quote. There's more quotes I believe I haven't got here either but they're very hard to hunt down.

Please do also remember, that if this is the world of death, and we all grow old and die here, then doesn't that mean that it invalidates the so called law since these experiences aren't under the law? He says that our birth and death conditions are fixed, thus the law doesn't apply to this, therefore the law cannot be all encompassing.

"This lady has tasted of the power of the age to come, and now sees everything as a symbol and we, merely actors in the play of life. Returning to an old state, she sees it as the same play being repeated with slight modifications. While trying to bring the past back to its former state by replacing her books, she realizes it means nothing. And as she sees her grandmother alive, young, vital, and wonderful and recognizes the symbolism she represents, her grandmother vanishes from sight.

I have been sent to tell you of a power of which you may be totally unaware. To tell you that you do not need any social, intellectual, or financial background to achieve your goals. Do you realize you could be number one in the social register, have the intelligence of an Einstein and the money of a Rockefeller . . yet not reach your objective? And you can have none of these things, yet fulfill your every desire if you will but believe me.

When the question was asked: “What is the work of God?” the answer came: “To believe in him whom he has sent.” This does not mean to believe in Neville as a man, but to believe what I tell you. Divorce the man from the message and believe in my words, for I and my Father are one and the words I speak are those of my Father, who is Jesus Christ.

Knowing his physical origin, Jesus was condemned for always being in the company of tax collectors and sinners. And when they asked him where he came from, he answered: “If I told you, you would not believe me.” When asked: “Who is your father?” he replied: “If you knew me, you would know my father also, but you know neither me nor my father. My father is he who you call God. I know my father and you know not your God.” Then they took up stones and stoned him, because they did not believe his ultimate origin, and saw only his physical one." - infinite power 1968

This is another interesting series of quotes. He said that seeing in a higher state is seeing everything as symbols, which really it all is, which I've talked about many times in old notebook entries where the senses are the limits and the thematics should be the language we live by.

"“Examine yourselves to see if you are holding to your faith. Test yourselves! Do you not realize that Jesus Christ is in you?” Now, faith is not complete until through experiment it becomes experience! When you test the Christ in you and prove from experience that it works, then you have the faith. But first you must find who Christ is, where he is, and what he is. You are not called upon to test a tradition of man as something on the outside, but Jesus Christ who is in you!" - Christ in you 1969

There's one. Faith is not complete without experience of it, meaning an anchor that holds charge representing the fulfilment of the desire, the acceptance of that aspect of self. Faith is an expansion mechanism therefore we could say, just like belief. Faith is repeated experience of something you know to be true and will not waver on since you KNOW from experience and felt the charge that overpowers all conditions against that fact. This is where faith comes in, and how we have complete faith, and thus belief.

"In the earliest gospel you will discover that the turning point is repentance. The very first words spoken by the pattern man are: “The time is fulfilled and the kingdom of God is at hand. Repent and believe in the gospel.” Believe the good news that you have heard from me. To repent is to radically change your mind. Regardless of what you believe, when God’s pattern of salvation is presented, can you accept it? Can you completely turn from the belief in a physical Christ on the outside, to the belief in a man of spirit on the inside? Or are you like the foolish Galatians, before whose eyes Jesus Christ was publicly portrayed as crucified? Do you know what the word “portray” means? “To make a picture of; to describe in words; to play a part like a drama on the stage.” Jesus Christ was portrayed as crucified; so “Let me ask you only this, did you receive the Spirit by the works of the law, or by hearing with faith? Are you so foolish having received the Spirit, are you now ending with the flesh?”

Repentance is turning around from the belief of a fleshly being called Jesus Christ, to the spirit that is Christ, the pattern man who is trying to awaken in you. Turn around by exercising your right to change your mind. Dare to believe the opposite, in spite of the facts that seem to be screaming at you. This is what I call “revision” and the Bible calls “repentance”. To revise is to repeal and if you have repealed a thing you have changed it. You can modify your concept of Christ and not completely change it by holding onto a little bit of the physical nature; but eventually you will drop it and turn around to start moving upward with the spiritual Christ, as the pattern which must unfold in all, unfolds in you." - Eschatology the drama of the end 1968

He says "turn around" relating to repenting. The alchemist says repentance is to "turn the light". Same principle, different details in mechanics. You really are in effect though doing the same thing, because with advanced gazing you tap directly into the Christ seed. You're literally overlapping the Christ seed when you perform advanced gazing, seeing through the eyes of the "imagination" itself. I can market this to get people into my coaching if they're desperate. They'll want it real bad. Talk about coaching a ton and offer payment plans for my 10k program to get a chance at it. Too bad. I can make bank if I want, I more than deserve this for the painstaking hours I've put into figuring this out.

"I had accepted the fact that I was on the ship. I knew it psychologically. That’s Christianity. “You have heard it said, ‘You must not commit adultery’ but I tell you, any man who looks lustfully upon a woman has already committed the act.” How? Psychologically. I may restrain the impulse and believe that because I didn’t perform the act I kept the law, but no one is justified by law in the presence of God. “Did you receive the Spirit by the works of the law or by hearing with faith?” It is not the law on this level that allows man to transcend this world. The law, operated psychologically, works perfectly on this level, and as I operate it I AM preparing the way for the promise to fulfill itself in me, for the promise comes after the law." - examine yourselves

NG says it's not the law that allows us to transcend this world, thus confirming what I said before about being able to "manifest" enlightenment of others and that they'll call you mad and such for your beliefs in the truth as part of scripture. NG says that the law leads the way for the promise to open up, and remember Paul says that the law is the "schoolmaster".

"Now we will go to this great Book of Galatians, 2:20: “I have been crucified with Christ; it is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me; and the life I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me.” Bear in mind imagining being that son, imagination being God the Father. Now let us go to the first two verses of the 3rd chapter: “O foolish Galatians! Who has bewitched you, before whose eyes Jesus Christ was publicly portrayed as crucified? Let me ask you only this: Did you receive the Spirit by works of the law, or by hearing with faith?” Listen to the words carefully: “Before whose eyes Jesus Christ was publicly portrayed as crucified.” Do you know what “portray” means? I think we all know, but let me refresh your memory: “To depict in a drawing or painting; or in some verbal description; or as an action on a stage,” a play on the stage. “O foolish Galatians! Who has bewitched you, before whose eyes Jesus Christ was publicly portrayed as crucified?” Answer me only this: “Did you receive the Spirit by works of the law, or by hearing with faith?” “Are you so foolish? Having begun with the Spirit, are you ending with the flesh?” Do you get it? The whole vast world has fallen victim to believing in the flesh of Jesus. Have you, having begun with the spirit, are you falling now, actually blind, and a victim of the flesh?" - Paul's autobiography 1963

Well here NG tells us that the whole world fell for a deception that's built into the very fabric of this world. This means that there's things we cannot change about this world, because they have function, AKA the law isn't all encompassing and only exists to reveal the promise. NG says the law comes first then the promise, but in another lecture he says that the law cannot complete the promise because faith in the pattern to a degree beyond the law is necessary to complete the promise.

"Now go back to the first chapter of John, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” (John 1:1) Now the Word is detached from the Tree of Life. “The Word became flesh and dwelt within us.” (John 1:14) He detaches it. God tears out of His own Being His Son, that they all may become as He is, and he actually engrafts them, as we are told in the book of James. “Receive with meekness the implanted Word.” (James 1:21 RSV ) And, so, that’s the Word, and you are that Word, that spore that is now engrafted into that wonderful stock called “Humanity.”

And, now, when you come out, you do not bear the fruit of man; you bear the fruit of that Tree from which you were taken, and that was God Himself. And the Bible tells you the fruit, so you follow the pattern.

When you go home, if not tonight, in the not-distant future, take the book of Hebrews. Every chapter quotes the Old Testament. Numberless verses all the way through quote the Old Testament. No other book is quoted . . only the Bible, and that “bible” is the Old Testament. It lays out the pattern for you, the most marvelous pattern all the way through. You will see, beginning with the very beginning “In many and various ways God spoke of old to our fathers by the prophets; but in these last days He has spoken to us by a Son.” (Hebrews 1:1, 2) Then he tells you who that Son is. And the first quote that he makes after that, of whom did he say . . and he quotes that 2nd Psalm, “Thou art my Son, today I have begotten thee.” (Hebrews 1:5) There he is quoting the words mentioned by David. Then he goes on, and you receive it in faith.

Then he takes the entire 11th chapter, which is a hymn in praise of faith, and goes forward into the 12th chapter, and shows you these characters who did not receive it, but still they are sustained by the faith of the Promise, and they are moving forward until that moment in time when the whole thing unfolds within them. He names all these wonderful characters in Scripture who had it, who accepted it on faith but not by works, because works cannot produce it. You either reject it, or you believe it.

If you accept it, then it is engrafted, and that wonderful spore is engrafted by your acceptance in faith alone." - the promise fulfilled unknown date

This is more about the seed and the grafting of components. Works also seem to reference works of the law, as in being someone. NG seems to say this isn't justifying to God, but faith is, and faith is in this sense belief in God as the pattern within, but that would necessitate that your thematic sequencing would unfold via the law as well, so the law leads to ripeness through observation of self and thus faith in capacities of the seed/pattern within.

"Q. [Inaudible]

Neville: My dear, I believe in being as specific as one can be. I just knew what I wanted so often on certain things, and wanted it in detail, and got it. If man cannot be that specific, all well and good. Take an end, an over-all end. But if you really are specific, God is very definite. Outline is perfect in God’s world. Look at the thumbprint. Not only a man’s thumbprint differs from all thumbprints, but his odor . . or the bloodhound couldn’t find you. Just imagine three and a half billion of us, and no two have the identical odor. No two have the same sound to their voice . . similar but not identical. See it on the tape as you speak, and that vibration will record it. You cannot reproduce it. Similar? Yes. No two . . you are so unique. You are the only one; therefore you cannot be replaced. [Transcriber: Completed from my notes; tape ran out at this point] There is no one in all eternity that can replace you. That is why you have to be saved, or the Living Temple cannot be completed. You are a stone in this living temple. God was very specific when he made you the unique being that you are.

I will not be “lost in the crowd” for the simple reason that God did not lose me in the crowd. I am individualized, and I tend forever and ever towards greater individualization.

Q. [Inaudible]

A. To be meek is to be self-disciplined or well trained. “The meek shall inherit the earth” because they have learned to use their Imagination." - power 1968

More on individuation as well as faith stemming from those who "learned to use their imagination" AKA operate as self through the work we do here at RS.

"Then we are told, “The meek of the earth seek righteousness and it is to the meek of the earth that the earth is given. As you are told the meek shall inherit the earth. You might have been taught to believe it meant the beaten man, the man who falls and grovels like the grasshopper; it doesn’t. The word “meek” if translated actually means to be tamed as a wild animal is tamed. To the man who tames the mind, the man who tames his being that he can set it any task and have it execute that task, that man is meek and the meek inherit the earth. And the meek always seek righteousness, so if I today began to subdue this earth, I must make righteousness my watchword, and so if I were righteous I would now single out the nature of the trees I would plant, the nature of the flowers I would plant, the nature of the animals I would cultivate, the nature of the fish that I would catch, and I would name them as desirable states, called in the Bible beauty instead of ashes, called in the Bible the spirit of joy instead of mourning, called by all these lovely things. As you are told, all the things that are good, dwell on these things. To every good thing, for He called it very good. Everything that I would call the good, which is a righteous judgment, will be the right judgment. I, in spite of the evidence of my senses that would deny it, in spite of reason that would tell me that it was impossible of realization, having discovered that I am the one planting my garden, that this is the only garden to cultivate, that this is the only earth to subdue, I would start now and boldly assume the good, first for myself . . always start with Jerusalem . . then go into the world and preach the goodness by knowing the goodness.

When you meet someone, regardless of what the appearance would reveal, know the truth for that one and set him free. Know that knowing as he ought to be known first by himself, but if he hasn’t known it as true of himself, you at least know it for him. And though you never meet him in the flesh again keep on knowing the truth that sets man free by knowing he is already free, and you are cultivating your garden. You are bringing it into subjection, you are subduing it and then you shall have dominion. So you are supreme in your world if you only know the world that you really are; so man is the psychological earth on which this wonderful whirl of events takes place. Man is the psychological earth on which all the animals move; every emotion is symbolized as the animal. Every fowl of the air is truly the idea you entertain. Every fish of the deep is the invisible state that you could catch if you only knew how to cast your net on the right side. For you fish all night and catch nothing, but then comes one who knows, who is righteous, and he casts it on the right side, always that right side, and the right side is righteousness or right consciousness. And I will catch it; I may not see them, I don’t have to see them. I don’t have to wait for the evidence of my senses to confirm, for I am told, “And faith was accounted unto him for righteousness.” So I will have faith in the reality of the deep; I will have faith in the reality of invisible states. So it’s now invisible, I know it, it’s a fish, but I have faith in the existence and the reality of the invisible state I want to externalize, knowing I can externalize it, for every time I externalize it I add to this wonderful garment of my Father, and that is my job, my duty." - your supreme dominion 1953

Being meek is to be clear. Animals in scripture apparently represent emotional current.

"So here, everyone of us, begin to believe that you are the only earth spoken of in the Bible. You are the one chosen to live in the center of the garden, but make it a garden, for the words are, “Keep it, keep it and plant it well”. You have dominion over every idea in your mind. You say you haven’t. Well, some may be to you disturbing, but you do have the choice of rejecting it or accepting it.

If you accept it, you identify with it and the state with which you are identified must, by the very law of your being, objectify itself within your world, that you may see by it how you plant that garden. Now, don’t wait one second beyond the time that you observe weeds instead of flowers. Start right at the moment of observation, and start to replant the garden. Start really to subdue it. Become the meek and the meek is the bold. The meek is the bold of heart who does not ask assistance. He walks knowing he can do it. He can fish. He can actually bring into subjection every bird of the air, every idea of the mind. He will begin to know these things spiritually. He will know them in the only way that you and I should know anything, by becoming it, not to have a world of information concerning objective things, and knowing these things only mentally. I must learn to know things spiritually; I must learn to know what love is spiritually by being in love. I must learn to know what security is spiritually be becoming conscious of already being secure. I must learn to know what health is by becoming conscious of already being healthy, and sustain these states in the name of righteousness, knowing that my righteousness shall answer for me in time to come." - same lecture

"So, here, today when you return read the whole chapter. It’s beautiful. But I started with the 27th verse, “And God made man in his own image, in the image of God made He him. Male and female made He them.” Then comes what is to be done. Then comes the promise if you do it. Then comes the judgment, “It is good and very good.” So you start knowing that you are the earth on which you now start to labor. If you do it, you shall be fruitful, and you will multiply, and you actually replenish this world, though it seemingly is barren you replenish it, if you subdue it. And the earth is self to be subdued, not by beating self as some people have misunderstood, not by isolating the self in some little secluded spot, not by running away from life, but in the midst of life is the opportunity to become meek: to take the violence that is man, it is individual man, and then bring it into the state of the meek, to transcend the violence by not fighting against conditions; know that conditions can only reflect what is within the one who observes that condition. So don’t rage against it; leave it just as it is. If conditions remain the same, that is a sure, sure sign that you have not been faithful to righteousness.

Had you been faithful to the consciousness of already being the man you want to be, conditions would have to change in harmony with that righteousness. So don’t rage against it; leave it as it is, and start today to take this wonderful earth, which is the foot stool of the Lord, which really is the mind of man, and start really to work upon it. Then you will not turn from left to right; you will keep the narrow path. You will go out knowing you can do it.

I know from experience it will not take long to see shoots appear; it will not take long to see the flowers appear. They will all appear, if you will take yourself in hand and by an uncritical observation of self watch the being you are; see the condition of the earth as it is now by the uncritical observation of your reactions to life. When you see who you are that is showing you the state of the earth as it is now. Don’t condemn it, just start to subdue it, and know that you do have dominion over all the fish of the sea, the fowls of the air, and all the animals that move upon the earth. Knowing them to be the moods of thought, the desires, the passions that move in you, start to entertain only the good and the very good.

Dwell upon them and you will re-people your earth for you are supreme within the circle of your own consciousness. Now you may say it’s a very little one; may I tell you that though you have a body and a life of your own, you are rooted in me, and you end in me, as I AM rooted in God and end in God." - same lecture

Pretty clear message here. Don't buy into conditions basically. Interesting that he also talked about passions that move you and such.

SP TIP.

What would having the SP imply you can experience now? That implication is better than "I have X" or whatever name they are. 100x better. For me the meaning was freeing myself from the binds of the conditions as I've gone over, but for others it might be something else like what that person opens up, such as going to some place you wanted to be at with them. That's one that comes to mind with me, and sharing that moment would be so lovely, as NG would say.

"You agreed to take upon yourself this garment of anatomy called man, which is filled to overflowing with passion. Now, believing yourself to be human, you have emptied yourself of your power and wisdom. You cannot restrain the impulse to act, even though you were told that if you entertained one concupiscent thought you would die. Can you now see that the drama is psychological and not physical?

The moment you contemplate an act, it has been committed. Whether it is pleasant and you may be inclined to do it physically, or you restrain the impulse to act upon that which you are contemplating, the act is already done!" - God's wisest creature 1968

This is terrible advice. Restrain the impulse to act, restrain intuitive impulse. He's approaching this from the perspective of how the charge will make you feel this "need" to act. Intuitive impulse never stems from this needing feeling of impulsivity that's dysfunctional coming from agitation, though in many cases it can lead you to act anyway.

"“You have heard it said of old: ‘You shall not commit adultery,’ but I say to you that any man who looks upon a woman lustfully has already committed the act with her in his heart.” Here you see the whole drama put into a psychological frame. It is not good enough to restrain the impulse. You can’t even have it! God consigned you to disobedience by giving you a garment of passion and then telling you that if you entertained one concupiscent thought, you would die." - same

So according to this we must remove all need at the root. Well, good luck there with this passion.

"Causation in our world is really mental. It was not always known as a mental state; it was believed (in the beginning) to be spiritual. And so laws were instituted and men abided by these laws. Outwardly they observed the laws. Then came the great revelation of “grace” that interpreted the law, thus bringing grace. For, says he: “Do not think that I have come to abolish the law and the prophets; I have come not to abolish them but to fulfill them.” And then he interprets law for us and puts it on a mental plane. “You have heard it said by men of old, ‘Thou shalt not’” and then he states it. “But I say unto you,” and then he puts it on an entirely different level and not one statement conveys it more graphically than this one: “You have heard it said of old ‘Thou shalt not commit adultery, but I say unto you, to look on a woman lustfully is to already have committed the act with her in your heart.’” To restrain the impulse, that is not good enough; but not having the desire, for then you haven’t committed the act. But to have the desire, and because of the consequences of your act you restrain the impulse, that is still not good enough . . the act was committed with the impulse." - grace vs law 1963

So here he says we need to not have the desire, not have the pressure, not feel the agitation, then we don't commit the act and sin. Isn't this what I've been saying about mediating charge? Sink charge works wonders for this in the moment, though long term it's going to need to tap roots.

"If I look upon a woman lustfully and I think I can get away with it, and it seems pleasant, I may be inclined to do it. If I contemplate that act along with its consequences for myself and my family, I may restrain the impulse. But, he tells me that’s not good enough – in the contemplation of the act I did it." - one greater than John unknown date

So here's that again. We must not have pressure to satisfy at baseline. We must be satisfied.

"So, causation is mental, it’s not physical. John didn’t know that. The state called John didn’t know that. If I restricted myself and resisted the impulse, I thought, “Well, am I not wonderful! I have just abided by the law ‘ye shall not do.”

Then comes the next state called Jesus Christ, and that state tells me that wasn’t good enough; the wheel is turning and you are going to do it tomorrow. The wheel will turn now and tomorrow when it turns all over again, you will be performing the act.

And you’ll wonder why has this happened to me to the disgrace of my family and myself? Because you thought by the restraint of the act you didn’t do it. And now he interprets the law for us and tells us the very contemplation of the act was the act. And so, when one gets to that point where they don’t even contemplate it, well, then off the wheel of recurrence we are lifted, one by one. And that is the story of the one that is greater than John." - same lecture

Well that's interesting. He's basically telling us then that restraining is sin because we feel the pressure coming up to move that current. If the current of agitation is present then it needs to be mediated at the roots into satisfaction, AKA the conditions need to become irrelevant which establish such pressure.

"So I abide by all external things and that doesn’t get me any place into the kingdom of heaven. Then I begin to do violence to my appetite. I restrain the impulse to do this, that, or the other, not knowing that life itself is nothing more than the appeasement of hunger, and God and only God gives me the different hungers." - same

God gives me different hungers huh. So different desire, pressure to experience, these are from God, which will operate the law by default mechanics.

"Now you may go out tonight and say that imagining creates reality, and you could rehearse it so that you will say it in your dream, but do you believe it? If you believe it, this is the test how you believe. Try to realize what a severe test of belief action is. I say I believe, but I don’t act upon it. If I really believe, I couldn’t restrain the impulse to act, I couldn’t. If I believe that imagining creates reality and I’m faced with a problem, it doesn’t take me long to conceive the solution of the problem. I don’t care what it is, what the problem is. If I have a problem, I need not wait to ask anyone, I could conceive the solution. Well, does imagining create reality? Will I act upon it and simply imagine? Will I? If I don’t, then I haven’t met the test, and so my so-called belief could only be a half-belief. And so, action tests belief. When I am faced with anything in this world, do I act or do I exhaust all the little channels first before I act? The chances are that man goes through everything that is called a wise channel, everything, and when he exhausts all the channels, maybe, in sheer desperation, finding no other place to turn he might turn back to scripture, and then act. And would he act? If he acts, the promise is this, listen to it carefully, “Whatever you desire, when you pray, believe you have received it, and you will receive it.” That’s the promise. “And thy word is truth.” So will we believe?" - our real beliefs 1966

More on satisfaction and action. Action in itself by the way if applied correctly can mediate pressure in powerful meaningful ways. Without implied involvement I'd not be here now. That saved my life.

"Now, let me warn you tonight, wait until you get home to try it. It’s much better to imagine the crisp currency falling on your bed than on the freeway! But do it, for I tell you everything is an imaginal act. There is no such thing as physical causation. It’s all imaginal, but the world will not accept it. They laugh at the man of imagination but they cannot disprove it. A man may physically strike another. That was the physical cause while the blow he received was the effect; therefore the whole thing appeared to be constructed physically, but I ask you: what preceded the impulse to strike? That impulse was the unseen cause, which was an imaginal act. The world is brought into being by imagination and sustained by imagination, and when imagination no longer sustains it, it dissolves and leaves not a trace behind. One must approach the gospel on this level first. If one’s interest is aroused on this level and it is proved to be true in the testing, then they may be interested in hearing about the promise." - power called the law 1969

"The impulse was the unseen cause, which was an imaginal act". The imaginal act I've decoded so clearly here. The act simply moves current, as we know, but that the baseline degree of charge that results from this act is going to "come up" as the impulse in future. Wow, we've decoded all the mystery here. It's basic "nervous system regulation" that's irrefutably proven. So many people buy into the mind magic trash. I even use to think he preached mind magic but it's not, because who could've written detailed notes on over 3300 pages of his work in a reasonable amount of time. Good luck. It would take years of daily study. This is why my study tool makes this 10000x faster.

"So, it’s a psychological act, not a physical act. I may restrain the impulse because I’m afraid of the consequences. I don’t want to destroy my social position or my financial position or my family life; yet I may entertain the thought. Well, I am told, my cowardice did not save me from the act. Others went out without contemplating the consequences, and they were caught in the act." - test him and see 1969

"You are told: “You have heard it said, ‘thou shalt not kill’ but I say unto you . . .Thou shalt not commit adultery, but I say unto you, any man who looks lustfully upon a woman has already committed the act in his heart.” The whole thing is raised from the physical level of the Pharisee, where he does not do it physically but he does it mentally and it is raised to the level of the mind, where if you do it mentally you have done it. To plot and plan to take advantage of another and you restrain the impulse, you think of the consequences to yourself, your friends and family and because you could not stand the embarrassment if you were caught then you restrain the impulse to do it. That was not good enough. You should not have entertained the thought. To entertain the thought is to perform the act, with the new code. Until you cannot even entertain the thought, if I contemplate an act and it seems pleasant, I might be inclined to do it if I could get away with it. But if I contemplate the act, along with the consequences to myself and others, and restrain the impulse if the act is to take advantage of another for personal gain, I am told that is not good enough." - the pure in heart 1963

NG says that just thinking about the thing and internally reacting is sin. Why? Because it's still the unresolved conflicts arising. Actually expressing that impulse there would be more functional since the implication would drop importance as a result, though NG doesn't teach it this way. He does it in the "safe" way. I teach it in the fastest way. NG before said that an imaginal act caused the impulse, but we know this is because of charge in the circuits driving that psychological translation on a thematic level into sensory thought to represent the importance of the implication of the stimulus coming up as the reaction.

If you understood that then you'll decode all the seeming magic. I know there's no magic to what he says, and the few instances that magic seems to occur it's because it was ripe to do so.

"But while waiting to hold that child in my hand that I may know it’s been born—-from then on expansion after expansion—while I’m waiting he gave me a law and we’re told the law comes 400 years after the promise. So the promise, everyone has received it…and the law we’ve all received. And teachers are sent into the world to stimulate interest in the law. The law is inward, it’s not outward. It’s not going to church and giving ten percent to the church. It’s not going and burning some little incense. It’s not doing anything on the outside. Listen to these words that show it so quickly, instantly, the inwardness of the law: “You’ve heard it said, ‘You should not commit adultery.’ But I say to you, anyone who looks at a woman with lust in his heart has already committed adultery with her,” any one (Mat. 5:27). It’s an inward act. Now you take this into anything in this world. I can contemplate a state and if it seems desirable I may be inclined to do it. But if I contemplate it along with its consequences, I may restrain the impulse. I may contemplate the idea of stealing, and then I think of the consequences, suppose I’m caught. To get all that may seem good, but to get it and then be put in jail may seem not quite what I want, so I restrain the impulse. But I am told to contemplate the state even though I restrain the impulse was in itself the act. The inwardness of the law is revealed to man.

So tonight you can contemplate being a wonderful person, a successful man, a successful woman, a happy man, a happy woman, one that is secure, exactly as you want in this world, and you contemplate it. But don’t ask yourself how; that is part of this wonderful law that imagining creates reality. You contemplate the state, and you wonder what the feeling would be like were it true. Then you feel yourself into that state as though it were true, and you view the world from that state as though it is true. Now, one second later something could break the spell and you’re back to where you were when you began to contemplate it. But you planted it! At that very moment when you felt yourself in it you planted it. Now when it matures in your world, it may come through so many strange ways you may forget that moment in time when you planted it…and then give all people in your world credit for the thing that has happened to you, forgetting completely that causation is spiritual, that the physical effect is not causative at all. It hasn’t any physical causation, it’s all spiritual; that that mental act when you lost yourself in the state that was the time you planted the seed. And then, all of a sudden, you come upon it and you reap it. If man could only remember that causation is spiritual and it has never been and never will be physical!

So tonight, you’re free. You can plant. You’re a sower. You have ideas, so you plant the thought, you sow the thought, and if you sow the thought tonight, then you’re going to reap an act. You can’t help it. Then you reap the act. You’re going to find you plant that, sow that, and it’s become a habit. Then you plant the habit, you repeat the habit, it becomes a character. Then your character becomes your destiny and that you can’t stop. So, my tomorrow will be determined by the thought that I sow today. “Be not deceived; God is not mocked, whatever a man sows, that—-not something else—-that shall he also reap.” And this law comes to us at the end of the 8th chapter of the Book of Genesis. A new world begins to appear, and “seedtime and harvest shall never come to an end. All things will bring forth after their kind; it will never come to an end” (verse 22). This is seedtime and harvest." - the sower 1965

Inwardness. The current driving psychological phenomena through the meridian systems. Everything I planted before has now fruit to show. I didn't KNOW it would, but I KNEW it would based on how I felt.

"One must see the whole vast world as a psychological drama. You may think you have never committed adultery, but the moment you lust after anything, the stage is set by your imaginal act. Restraining the impulse is not good enough. The moment you have the impulse to steal, the act is committed. The impulse to hurt is the act of hurting. You may be afraid to carry out any act, but when the impulse appears, the act is committed. Once you understand this, you will forgive all, for there is only one son (who you are), doing your Father’s will." - truth, the word of God 1967

Here's more of NG talking about the inner impulse to act which is the sensation of yang activating that meridian system which psychologically relates to the thematics at hand.

"We rise to a higher level of consciousness, not because we have curbed our passions, but because we have cultivated our virtues. In truth, a meek man is one who is in complete control of his moods. And they are the highest, for he who desires to walk with the highest, must keep a high mood." - Arise unknown date

Here we have NG telling us that one who is meek is someone who's functional as themselves and holds no compromises within them to trigger implication of lack. They don't hold excessive yang or depletions that stimulate dysfunctional responses. Manifesting therefore is a meridian system phenomena. The reason why "imagination creates reality" is because of thematic supply/demand and the fact that all of our inner components within the Christ seed are also represented as the meridian systems and the elements of the psyche which are simulacrums of the Father which we are expanding into that capacity to complete the promise, or immortality. I know with 100% certainty that this works.

"The other one is the lack of faith in I am he (John 8:24). If I do not believe that I am he, I remain in my sin and therefore I miss the mark. I must believe that he became me with all of my weaknesses and all of my limitations, and his name is I AM. Well, if his name is I AM and he became me, assuming all of my weaknesses, he’s still I AM. Did he not tell me that he emptied himself and took upon himself the form of a slave? This [body] is a slave, a slave of my passions, a slave of my ambitions, a slave of everything in this world. I’m enslaved by it. So he took upon himself the form of a slave and became obedient unto death, even death upon the cross (Phil. 2:7), and this is the cross." - born from above, John 3 1968

Interesting one here too. We're a slave to all of this, our ambitions, pressure to expand. This is why I said we have no free will to avoid God giving us desire, which remember NG did say that God "gifts" us desire for expansion.

"So I say to everyone, it’s done in the same way. Your own wonderful human Imagination is not a state; that is your existence itself. The soul of man, the immortal soul, is your own wonderful human Imagination. It cannot go to eternal death in that body which cannot die. How can it? It’s forever. It’s passing through all these things and you and I…don’t try to become a holy person. That’s not our purpose. As Paul said (and he included Peter) when he made the statement in the 14th chapter of the Book of Acts, he said, We are men (speaking now of the two of them), men of passions like others. We pretend not to be holier than others, just as you are (verse 15). You don’t have to be a holy man as the world calls a holy man to practice God’s law, because holiness is not a passport to heaven, believe me. All you need to do is believe in your own wonderful human Imagination. That’s God, that is the being spoken of in scripture as God. And God’s creative power spoken of in scripture as Jesus Christ is your own wonderful human Imagination when it is in action. “God only acts and is in existing beings or men. So let us to him who only is, who is among us in our own wonderful Imagination, let us give to him the decision” (Marriage of Heaven/Hell, Blake)." - on the law 1965

Jesus is your imagination in action he says. Christ is the seed, the capacity for experience, and when activated manifests through us the being we are, the state based on the charges in various meridians which psychologically translate into phenomena.

"There is an inner man and he is skilled in arranging things so that they reach to desired ends, not based upon the evidence of the senses. The inner man, by standing here, could desire to be elsewhere and deny the evidence of my senses, denying reason, dare to assume I am where I would like to be, and rearrange the furniture of my mind. Instead of using this to tell me I am here, I use other furniture . . objects of my mind. Here I rearrange it and remain faithful to that state until it takes on the tones of reality. And when it seems to be sensory vivid and I open my eyes upon it, I am shocked to find I am still here. That is the inner man, called Jacob, the supplanter . . he takes the place of the outer man. He supplanted his brother twice. First he took his birthright, then he took his blessing; so these are the two in conflict and the whole story is one of conflict.

Eventually, after unnumbered ages, Jacob will be given the name of Israel, “a man after God’s own heart.” It seems to come soon, but it doesn’t really. No one knows the length of time between the awakening of these two states of consciousness and the fulfillment in the form of Israel. But you must read the Bible from all angles." - Esau, Jacob, Israel 1963

Remember that NG said that the characters of the OT represent those in the NT as well, like a mirror? Israel is Christ which is why there's all the tribes and the symbolism there. The components.

Here's revision and repentance again. Denying the world and the facts, not out of ignorance, but functionally mediating pressure to release unresolved conflicts and agitation from implications of unavailability of what we desire.

1/1/26

Only a few hours into the new year and we're back at it again. I was working almost all the way through the new year. Took more notes last night.

Conditioned desires are to please other people.

Seeing "through" the world via gazing ripens faith in the pattern.

Ever since I've come to grasp more about what NG really taught and how it's almost directly in line with what TCM says, I can now interpret imagination correctly as the functioning of all of your meridian systems. This is WHYYYYYYYY TCM exists. It exists for this purpose, it's the Daoist system of analyzing the "imagination". TCM and NG overlap, it just took me years to put it together. It's still becoming more clear but it's there.

I've made some incredible breakthroughs on new year of all days. Liver qi and heart qi and kind of kidney qi (yang) matters the most for this function of imaginal depth to work. You cannot vividly imagine without these circuits working. If people have aphantasia then it proves that imagination is not equal in all, as in the imaginal senses. There's levels to this and there's mechanics to it that can be decoded. Apparently people who get heart surgery often end up with their imaginal senses diminished significantly and I find this interesting. I will look for more data on this idea. Belief is charge associated to ideas which are compositions of thematic currents, AKA illumination in various meridians that overlap as representing pathway cascades (or even like the rising coloured smoke idea I use to use) and this determines the psychological experience. So if heart fire and liver yang rising can cause vivid imaginal senses (through excessive "uncontrolled" activation of those currents in those circuits which SHOULD also show up on MRI brain scans) then it means that a lack of qi, yang, activating current (given enough yin is available as fuel for yang as catalyzing the current) would lead to diminished imaginal activity. Gazing therefore must activate these channels and "flush" the circuits to "suck" up the Jing when ripeness is available to manifest what you see, AKA the dragon rising or the light of the dragon. I'm such a genius. Nobody on earth compares. Insight after insight, right after a "give up" period of facing more pressure. All of the NG mentalism stuff has been totally torn to shreds and it's been explained systematically for the first time ever, as far as I know. All done for free of course..

In TCM hallucinations can also be caused by phlegm heat/fire through the opposite mechanism of fire, it's through "misting". So phlegm is because the spleen qi isn't able to break down solidified dampness that's lodged and obstructing the channels. This is important because kidney yang contributes to the spleen qi functioning as a means of breaking down dampness and especially phlegm. It's like melting butter. Kidney yang is fire, and butter is like greasy thick sticky substance, You know how hard it is to get off when you try to wash it with cold water. You NEED hot water to get it off. Why? Because alchemy. Kidney yang is the root source of heat in the body, functional warming heat that is, though the spleen which is designed to dry and break down thick sticky dampness requires the flames of the kidney yang to lick the spleen for the spleen qi to be functional. This is why TEST often will run side by side a functional metabolism, and also why TEST therapy is a method of treating diabetes and other metabolic syndromes. I've had "pre-diabetes" level blood sugar in the past when I was extremely depleted on kidney yang and other substances with extreme anxiety attacks and such. It was resolved easily through empowering the base meridians, which now that I've recognized the mechanisms of "imagination creates reality" I can make complete sense of my recovery. Miracle healings stem from moving currents by letting go of stagnations ONLY when it's ripe, AKA the conditions of substances in their capacity for catalyzing are at that level where real belief can be felt, belief here being symbolic in a sense for the condition of the field geometry being in function or dysfunction depending on the charge which represents the current that's causing issues psychologically and or physically. So working with spleen qi and opening up that channel (even if someone has powerful kidney yang which it seems that they have enough of to be functional given my assessment) will be necessary to clear the obstruction for the shen which "mists" the heart and causes obsession. Obsession is in TCM almost ALWAYS caused by phlegm, and the "colour" of the mist represents the format of the blockage of that channel. Sounds opposite when you think of it physically like pipes being blocked vs smoke colours changing perception but it's the same thing metaphysically. TCM can be confusing at times but enough study makes sense of these things, it just takes YEARS of being WRONG to get there. So to clear the obsession, you don't do anything other than work with spleen qi, and fixate their awareness on the form of the phlegm in the channel that's "formatting" the current like steam changing colour to cloud the vision of someone in the haze, and that will open up clarity and thus belief in necessary ways outside of the obsession. They'll see "through" the obsession.

This has given me an idea on how to approach a client that's not gotten results with me and has signs of hallucinations that are very very intense. I believe I have the answer now given this analysis which I never actually thought of before. When someone has forced imaginal sensory openings through regular advanced gazing (which activates the channel VERY strongly) then you'll only enforce then the phlegm stagnation in terms of how much it'll activate and cause obsession since more juice is moving through that channel. How do we know these channels exist? Tsubos. You can FEEL it, shiatsu taught me this years back. I guess all that time as a remedial massage therapist wasn't for nothing then. Learned a lot.

So when phlegm (obsessive type) forms it's due to the fluids of the body congealing through stagnation or cold (or even heat in some cases) that comes from trauma. As far as I know I've not come across any source talking about physical dampness congealing into phlegm causing obsession, such as literal fat like organ fat metaphysically causing a form of misting, though it might be possible. The point at which it congeals is the point at which the "imprint" of meaning on that fluid becomes "marked" more or less as a sort of "pattern" or colour that warps the current moving through that channel whenever it's thematically triggered in the pathway cascades. It's not ALWAYS triggered, but will be more often if the thematic is made conscious through related stimulus more often.

Interesting data here too. Apparently often those with aphantasia, especially those who acquire it from an incident of some form, those people have vivid dreams but can't consciously imagine sensory details in their mind. This to me links it not to a lack of liver yang activation but shen. There's lots of people who have "vivid" imaginations as in their creative nature and vision for what they desire to create can be powerful (realm of liver hun) vs someone with poor imaginal sensory details. This proves clearly that you DO NOT NEED YOUR IMAGINAL SENSES TO "manifest". ANYTHING EVER. It's current phenomena, always all the time. The imaginal senses are just a translation of those currents for those who have access to that interface in a vivid way but it's not necessary.

I don't think I need more NG quotes to prove any of this now really. It's clearly proven. "motor response" is enough to destroy mentalism if you ask me.

Persistence = implied involvement ripening. NG sees it as just ripening but we take it a step further here.

This program is coming together so much better now.

Imaginal acts to be useful require "it's real" under the context of the implication being dead to you and that the act will be a sort of "bridge crossing" event of cutting through the condition meaningfully. That's the dying and thus "dropping" and "forgetting" because the charge over the implication mattering is minimized as you're now out of the influence of that meaning something important to you. I'm going to add each of NG's books into my study resource. Last things to dig quotes from is his books. Here's a list of all of his books.

At your command 1939
Your faith is your fortune 1941
Freedom for all 1942
Feeling is the secret 1944
Prayer: the art of believing 1945
The search 1946
Five lessons 1948
Out of this world 1949
The power of awareness 1952
The power of unlimited imagination 1952
Awakened imagination 1954
Seedtime and harvest 1956
I know my father 1960
The law and the promise 1961
He breaks the shell 1964
Resurrection 1966

There's smaller "articles" or lectures he wrote out in the early 50's which I've already got in my study tool. The power of unlimited imagination is a lecture compilation so I don't count that as a "book".

Ok I've put together his books into one document to search through. Time to run the search tool with each of these terms.

Abandonment
Absorption
Accept
Action
Activate
Appearance
Assemblage
Attitude
Believe
Boomerang
Causation
Cause
Challenge
Christ
Christ seed
Condition
Contemplate
Crucifixion
Dare
Death
Desire
Detach
Die
Dissatisfaction
Doubt
Drop it
Dwell
Emotion
End
Evidence
Faculty
Faith
Fears
Feminine
Ferment
Figurative
Forgive
Graft
Heaven
High mood
How to
Ideal
Identity
Immortal
Impression
in the course of a day
Individual
Intensity
Inward
Lessons
Let go
Meditation
Meek
Motion
Motor
Natural
Nervous
Objective
Observe
Oil
Out pictures
Parent
Passion
Pattern
Penetrate
Persist/ence
Potency
Power
Pushed out
Reaction
Rearrange
Reincarnation - reincarnation
Remain faithful
Represent
Restored
Restrict
Righteous
Satisfied
Scene
Seal
Secret
Seed
Separate
Sensation
Shadowy
Sphere
Spiritual
Spirit world
State
Structure
Subconscious
Suggestion
Subjective
Sustain
Technique
Translate
Trinity
Twelve
Unbelief
Vision
Vortex
Wind
Wine
Worth
Yield

That's all the terms I've done deep search on in his lectures. Lots of quotes as you can imagine. Thousands. Now we apply this to his books and see what we get. This is all I need to search through to have fully scrubbed his entire corpus of work for nuggets to reference, and build my program with. The only one on each that has done a full systematic study. Everyone will be copying my work in future. I'm the only one who's gone this deep and will be the gold standard of NG interpretation from now on. 2026 RS takes over LOA and we get big. It's show time boys.

Every reference from here will be to books not lectures, unless stated otherwise. Everything before here is from lectures, unless stated otherwise.

Let's begin with "subconscious". There's 121 matches for this word, and almost all of them are in feeling is the secret, but it also pops up in the search, the power of awareness and awakened imagination.

"Your assumptions determine not only what you see, but also what you do, for they govern all your conscious and subconscious movements towards the fulfillment of themselves." - the power of awareness 1952

"Your assumption guides all your conscious and subconscious movements towards its suggested end so inevitably that it actually dictates the events." - same

Well that means that the currents guide us, as I've said. God moves through you. Do keep in mind this is 1952 when he pretty much fully gave up on using the term subconscious. The last mention of the term subconscious in his lectures was in 1953 and there's one mention in his book awakened imagination.

"If the story of the immaculate conception and birth of Christ appears irrational to man, it is only because it is misread as biography, history, and cosmology, and the modern explorers of the imagination do not help by calling It the unconscious or subconscious mind." awakened imagination 1954

So from 1954 onwards he never mentions that term. Assumptions in this context as we know represent currents, pathway cascades that drive your psychology and biochemistry and other levels.

Reaction next. Actually you know what screw trying to organize it here, save that for the program this is my notebook. I'll just reference quotes I want to here. That's it.

"Thirdly: close your eyes and feel that you are already in the city or state that you would capture. Remain within this psychological state until you get a conscious reaction of complete satisfaction in this victory. Then, by simply opening your eyes, return to your former conscious state." - your faith is your fortune 1941

"This secret journey into the desired state, with its subsequent psychological reaction of complete satisfaction, is all that is necessary to bring about total victory. This victorious psychical state will embody itself despite all opposition. It has the plan and power of self-expression. From this point forward, follow the example of Joshua, who, after psychologically dwelling in the desired state until he received a complete conscious reaction of victory, did nothing more to bring about this victory than to blow seven times on his trumpet." - same

"Make no mistake about this. If, as you prepare for sleep, you do not consciously feel yourself into the state of the answered wish, then you will take with you into the chamber of her who conceived you the sum total of the reactions and feelings of the waking day; and while asleep, you will be instructed in the manner in which they will be expressed tomorrow. You will rise believing that you are a free agent, not realizing that every action and event of the day is predetermined by your concept of self as you fell asleep. Your only freedom, then, is your freedom of reaction. You are free to choose how you feel and react to the day’s drama, but the drama…the actions, events and circumstances of the day…have already been determined." - feeling is the secret 1944

Can't agree with that, not fully at least. Thematically yeah you can say it's all pre-determined but in detail, I don't think so. In effect he's saying that our actions that we would take to get the desire would be determined ahead of the experience, which I can on some level agree with but in specific the how and why and where and when it all up to pressure gradients to determine and I don't see how we'd have any real meaningful control over that unless an obvious means is available to use physically through involvement.

"Close your eyes and feel yourself to be faceless, formless and without figure. Approach this stillness as though it were the easiest thing in the world to accomplish. This attitude will assure your success. When all thought of problem or self is dropped from consciousness because you are now absorbed or lost in the feeling of just being I AM, then begin in this formless state to feel yourself to be that which you desire to be, “I AM that I AM”.

The moment you reach a certain degree of intensity so that you actually feel yourself to be a new conception, this new feeling or consciousness is established and in due time will personify itself in the world of form. This new perception will express itself as naturally as you now express your present identity." - your faith is your fortune 1941

So here he's telling us to go into a place that most people can't even come close to touching, total stillness. If you've got heat in your system, this will be effectively impossible. When you're in that place you'll just experience the conflicts showing up spontaneously.

"The Father, Son and Holy Spirit are three aspects or conditions of the unconditioned awareness of being called God. The consciousness of being precedes the consciousness of being something. That unconditioned awareness which preceded all states of awareness is God...I AM. The three conditioned aspects or divisions of itself can best be told in this manner:

The receptive attitude of mind is that aspect which receives impressions and therefore may be likened to a womb or Mother.

That which makes the impression is the male or pressing aspect and is therefore known as Father.

The impression in time becomes an expression, which expression is ever the likeness and image of the impression; therefore, this objectified aspect is said to be the Son bearing witness of his Father-Mother." - same

So here is him defining the trinity.

One thing I just thought of, which I don't know if I can put together in any reliable capacity, and that's about a complete list of every "manifestation" that NG made show up "without lifting a finger". Don't believe it's many that would be significant.

"This receptive attitude is the state of consciousness that you must assume before an impression can be made. As this pliable and impressive state of mind is attained, then begin to impress upon yourself the fact that you are that which you desired to be by claiming and feeling that you are now expressing and possessing that which you had decided to be and to have. Continue in this attitude until the impression is made." - same

So this is a MUST huh. You need space. Well guess what Goddard, you gave examples of where people reacted on the spot to things in the world without ever assuming a so called receptive attitude so obviously this is either under the context of specific targeted work or you're contradicting. So many fools have no idea how to interpret this correctly it blows my mind.

"In this receptive attitude of yours, while you contemplated being that which you desired to be, you were actually performing the spiritual act of generation so you are now on your return from this silent meditation a pregnant being bearing a child or impression, which child was immaculately conceived without the aid of man." - same

So the impression is the child, the child being a capacity like a seed for growth, therefore even in his early work he talked about this same process of seeds and such.

"Such acceptance of your desire is like dropping seed, fertile seed, into prepared soil. For when you can drop the thing desired in consciousness, confident that it shall appear, you have done all that is expected to you. But, to be worried or concerned about the how of your desire maturing is to hold these fertile seeds in a mental grasp, and, therefore, never to have dropped them in the soil of confidence." - at your command 1939

So he tells us that if we have agitation of any form then we're going to not "drop" the seed. I'm going to argue that dropping it is the acceptance in itself, since the currents that are within are what we move and when they're satisfied then we don't worry and fear and such in the first place. The agitation is because you've not actually accepted it, or in more accurate terms, you've not cut through the conditions generating the agitation against the acceptance of the thing desired.

"Stop all of the old mechanical negative inner talking and start a new positive and constructive inner speech from premises of fulfilled desire. Inner talking is the beginning, the sowing of the seeds of future action. To determine the action, you must consciously initiate and control your inner talking." - awakened imagination 1954

Yeah we went over this yesterday, the self talk implies currents of availability or not, and unless the inner talk moves the implication of lack into satisfaction through cutting through the meaning against acceptance of the aim then you're stuck no matter what you tell yourself. That's the "reaction" you're eliciting by willingly conjuring pressurized scenarios and cutting through them as though they were real. This is the only way self talk can work, and if there's no agitation then you're simply ripe for it to work anyway and the self talk was simply the reflection of what was going to unfold anyway. The self talk in some instances may push you JUST over the edge into acceptance since the conditions were so miniscule that they didn't really matter and the affirmation moved you into complete satisfaction but I'll argue that most of the examples are just ripeness unfolding through you and the thoughts you thought caused it really didn't.

"“When I read in ‘Seedtime and Harvest’ the story of the school teacher who, through her imagination, in daily revision, transformed a delinquent pupil into a lovely girl, I decided to ‘do’ something about a young boy in my husband’s school." - the law and the promise 1961

Well that's something. What would the teacher have changed? How would this work? Well how does NG know it was the teacher who made it happen too? So many assumptions, charges, beliefs. Haven't you noticed that in most cases of so called successes in proving the so called law it's vague examples of other people having things happen in their lives just as a consequence of imagining before bed or whatever? Usually that's the case. I believe that this lack of meaningful rigor has also been an issue in demonstrating causality by isolating variables as I've attempted to do over the years.

"When this belief is so firmly established that you feel confident of results, your desire will embody itself. How it will be done, no man knows. I, your desire, have ways ye know not of; my ways are past finding out. Your desire can be likened to a seed, and seeds contain within themselves both the power and the plan of self-expression. Your consciousness is the soil. These seeds are successfully planted only if, after you have claimed yourself to be and to have that which you desire, you confidently await results without an anxious thought." - your faith is your fortune 1941

Well right there is proof of what I said in that video and in other examples. Your desire is like a seed. A seed is like a state. A state is like an egg. An egg is a capacity for growth, a pattern. A pattern is God, or at least a component of God.

"The numberless unrealized hopes and ambitions of man are the seeds which are buried within the consciousness or virgin womb of man. There they remain like the seeds of earth, held in the frozen waste of winter, waiting for the sun to move northward or for man to return to the knowledge of who he is. In returning he moves northward through recognition of his true self by claiming “I AM the light of the world”." - same

Well this is a good quote. Every vision we have is a seed which is buried within us already. Right there. They're frozen he says. ISN'T THAT WHAT I'VE ALWAYS SAID? "The seeds are already there". Planting them is "activating" them. He's saying this from the perception of all states though I'd say, which are arrangements of the currents. Thing is he DOES mention the unrealized hopes and dreams of man are within us already, capacities, for expansion which he's said in another lecture. In returning he says we recognize the true self, which is the pattern. He's saying here that there's all these visions we have, states within us, that are frozen and are waiting to be activated by the illumination of God, the true self. Works.

"Doubt is the only force capable of disturbing the seed or impression; to avoid a miscarriage of so wonderful a child, walk in secrecy through the necessary interval of time that it will take the impression to become an expression. Tell no man of your spiritual romance. Lock your secret within you in joy, confident and happy that someday you will bear the son of your lover by expressing and possessing the nature of your impression. Then will you know the mystery of “God said, Let Us make man in Our image”." - same

So doubt he says "disturbs" the seed, or impression. He likened seeds and impressions to be the same here. Interesting, because an impression is a pattern. That's a term I don't think I've studied extensively from within his lectures. He says that doubt and such can cause a "miscarriage". In other words, you "dig up the seed" or something, dig out the child, miscarriage. The pattern cannot fully unfold unless it can grow in its own accordance THROUGH you.

"I have seen people, apparently hopelessly in debt, apply this principle, and, in but a very short time, debts that were mountainous were removed. I have also seen those whom doctors had given up as incurable apply this principle and, in an incredibly short time, their so-called incurable disease vanished and left no scar. Look upon your desires as the spoken words of God and every word of prophecy of that which you are capable of being. Do not question whether you are worthy or unworthy to realize these desires. Accept them as they come to you. Give thanks for them as though they were gifts. Feel happy and grateful for having received such wonderful gifts. Then go your way in peace. Such simple acceptance of your desires is like the dropping of fertile seed into an ever-prepared soil. When you drop your desire in consciousness as a seed, confident that it shall appear in its full-blown potential, you have done all that is expected of you. To be worried or concerned about the manner of their unfoldment is to hold these fertile seeds in a mental grasp and, therefore, to prevent them from really maturing to full harvest." - same

Well here we have it. Accept the desires as they come, as gifts. You see, desires are "gifts" GIVEN to us. He says to not question our worth as to receive it, but that's what we will all do since desires by default for most of us are conditioned. He then says that dropping the seed IS the acceptance of the desire, AKA dropping the conditional overlay, else you'd be able to "react" naturally to it anyway out of ripeness when it comes to mind, correct? Our attachment is caused by unresolved agitations which IS a lack of faith, a lack of experience that moves current to confirm who we are relative to the seed/vision.

"Man’s clarified desires are seeds containing the power and plans of self-expression and, like the seeds within man, these, too, are buried within an oily substance (a joyful, thankful attitude of mind). As man contemplates being and possessing that which he desires to be and to possess, he has begun the process of pressing out or the spiritual act of creation. These seeds are pressed out and planted when man loses himself in a wild, mad state of joy, consciously feeling and claiming himself to be that which he formerly desired to be." - same

Desires are seeds. Clear as day. The desire contains the plan for self expression. The desire is a pattern, a part of the pathway cascade structure of the subconscious mind itself, the body IS the imagination made up of these overlapping states. Interestingly he said that the seeds are buried in an "oily substance", which he said here in brackets is a joyful thankful state of mind. He also said that the seeds are "pressed out". Interesting term I've not heard before. Pressed out seems to be this opposite of "impressed" then, and if impression is the response, then the out pressing (or as he sometimes says "out picturing") would be the outwards effect right? Pushed out is the inward pattern externally manifest, everyone is you pushed out.

"The seed which is pressed out of a man grows into the likeness of the man from whom it was pressed. Likewise, the mystical seed, your conscious claim that you are that which you heretofore desired to be, will grow into the likeness of you from whom and into whom it is pressed. Yes, Gethsemane is the cultivated garden of romance where the disciplined man goes to press seeds of joy (defined desires) out of himself into his receptive attitude of mind, there to care for and nurture them, by consciously walking in the joy of being all that formerly he desired to be." - same

Press seeds of joy (being "defined" desires" out of himself into a receptive attitude of mind to nurture the seed.

"Jesus took with Him into His hour of prayer His disciples, or disciplined attributes of mind, and commanded them to watch while He prayed, so that no thought or belief that would deny the realization of His desire might enter His consciousness. Follow the example of Jesus, who, with His desires clearly defined, entered the Garden of Gethsemane (the state of joy) accompanied by His disciples (His disciplined mind) to lose Himself in a wild joy of realization. The fixing of His attention on His objective was His command to His disciplined mind to watch and remain faithful to that fixation. Contemplating the joy that would be His on realizing His desire, He began the spiritual act of generation, the act of pressing out the mystical seed…His defined desire. In this fixation He remained, claiming and feeling Himself to be that which He (before He entered Gethsemane) desired to be, until His whole being (consciousness) was bathed in an oily sweat (joy) resembling blood (life), in short, until His whole consciousness was permeated with the living, sustained joy of being His defined objective." - same

Why does he keep talking about this so called state of Joy as being important? Yeah we should all feel joy, though this being the thing he fixates on a lot makes me clearly interpret this as an activation of shen. You ONLY feel the "explosion" because the shen is lifted up by the gate of life between the kidney meridians.

"If you had the faith of a grain of mustard seed, you would this day, through the magical substance of feeling, seal yourself in the consciousness of being that which you desire to be. In this mental stillness or tomblike state you would remain, confident that you need no one to roll away the stone, for all the mountains, stones and inhabitants of earth are nothing in your sight. That which you now recognize to be true of yourself (this present conscious state) will do according to its nature among all the inhabitants of earth, and none can stay its hand or say unto it, “What doest Thou?” None can stop this conscious state in which you are sealed, from embodying itself, nor question its right to be." - freedom for all 1942

Sealed. That's another term I need to study more in the lectures. I've referenced it a few times but it makes sense to be a "condition" of the field geometry given the arrangement of various thematic currents that relate to that targeted state.

"Scripture teaches in the form of parables, and we must learn to distinguish between the parable told and its message. In the 18th chapter of the gospel of Matthew we read that he placed a child in the midst of them and said, “See that you do not despise one of these little ones; for I tell you that in heaven their angels always behold the face of my Father who is in heaven.” The word ‘‘angel’’ means ‘‘a messenger; to bring forth,’’ and the word translated “child” means “an infant; a term of endearment.” Here we find a child is always be holding the face of the Father who is in heaven and bringing forth his message by becoming what he beholds." - all that is divine 1969

Angels mean messengers. We should already know that.

"Then the Father selects that angel who is best qualified to bear this message or germinal possibility to Mary. You select the person in your world who would be sincerely thrilled in witnessing the fulfillment of your desire. Then Mary learns through the angel that she has already conceived a Son without the aid of man. You assume a receptive attitude of mind, a listening attitude, and imagine you are hearing the voice of the one you have chosen to tell you what you desire to know. Imagine that you hear him tell you that you are and have that which you desire to be and to have. You remain in this receptive state until you feel the thrill of having heard the good and wonderful news. Then like Mary of the story, you go about your business in secret telling no one of this wonderful and immaculate self-impregnation, confident that in due season you will express this impression. The Father generates the seed or germinal possibility of a Son but in a eugenic impregnation; He does not convey the spermatozoa from Himself to the womb. He has it borne through another medium. Consciousness desiring, is the Father generating the seed or idea. A clarified desire is the perfectly formed seed or the only begotten Son. This seed is then carried from the Father (consciousness desiring) to the Mother (consciousness of being and having the state desired). This change in consciousness is accomplished by the angel or imaginary voice of a friend telling you that you have already achieved your objective." - freedom for all 1942

So this one he talks about the Father (god gifting your corporeal being the seed/desire) generating the seed or ideas. Listen to that. "Consciousness desiring, is the Father generating the seed or idea.". It comes through you from God. Is this not what I've always said? Natural striving? Intuitive impulse? If the Father is the source then of desire, pressure, in a certain thematic composition, and then the mother Mary contains the womb by which the Father enters inside to illuminate, then we have state overlap of air and earth, or on the lower level we have fire and water. Kidney heart axis. It works. The angel is the messenger, so in that case with this example of him talking about sensory details of the imagined voice, would the angel be the structure of the subjective sensory representation that motivates the desire of God to burst into the egg and fertilize it in reaction? It seems that this impotence is simply a sort of one time transport of the power of God, the pressure, through into the thematic composition to alter the charge relating to that state to no longer hold pressure and need, which would mean it's available and integrated and comfortable. Here I use to say his books weren't deep. I've read power of awareness, out of this world, feeling is the secret, seedtime and harvest, five lessons, prayer the art of believing, the law and the promise and some other ones MULTIPLE times and yet it seems that these earlier books seem to have all the mechanical details that I didn't pick up. You'd think his later books would have the mechanics but they don't, not much at least. Seedtime and harvest DOESN'T MENTION "seed/seedtime" ONCE! That book is almost entirely about the 4 mighty ones and some examples. It's so bad. Feeling is the secret is full of language that 99% of people will have no idea how to interpret clearly and the power of awareness has no useful mechanics, like the rest. It's only when you go through the earlier works that these mechanics are known here, like in his lectures.

"The use of an angel or friend’s voice to make a conscious impression is the shortest, safest and surest way to be self-impregnated. With your desire properly defined, you assume an attitude of listening. Imagine you are hearing the voice of a friend; then make him tell you (imagine he is telling you) how lucky and fortunate you are to have fully realized your desire. In this receptive attitude of mind you are receiving the message of an angel; you are receiving the impression that you are and have that which you desire to be and to have. The emotional thrill of having heard that which you desire to hear is the moment of conception. It is the moment you become self-impregnated, the moment you actually feel you are now that or have that which heretofore you but desired to be or to possess. As you emerge from this subjective experience, you, like Mary of the story, will know by your changed attitude of mind that you have conceived a Son; that you have fixed a definite subjective state and will in a little while express or objectify this state." - same

So the angel is the representation of someone as a mediator of implication for you, based on what I'm interpreting. That's why they're a "messenger" as they're a sort of means to bring meaning by imagining someone else to represent meaning to you that you're targeting thematically. He says that the proof that you've changed state is your attitude, or reactions to life. He's said this in other lectures I've quoted endlessly too including in my videos. That's why I've said it because your reactions are the evidence of inner change, because the charge that drove dysfunctional reactions has been moved.

"Your conception of yourself as you fall asleep is the seed you drop into the ground of the subconscious. Dropping off to sleep feeling satisfied and happy compels conditions and events to appear in your world which confirm these attitudes of mind. Sleep is the door into heaven. What you take in as a feeling you bring out as a condition, action, or object in space. So sleep in the feeling of the wish fulfilled. As in consciousness, so on earth." - feeling is the secret 1944

This has brought nothing but lack into my life. Doing this especially in the past ruined everything and destroyed all positive things in my life. Everything was taken away from me and left me with dust. I cannot count the amount of nights I would sleep in positive states feeling ACTUALLY happy, or at least what it would seem like to me then, while then waking up FEELING LIKE I AM DYING EVERY NIGHT AND BE IN HORRIBLE PAIN. I'd be next to a dead man walking when I did this. IT DOES NOT WORK! The ONLY thing that works is mediating pressure in meaningful ways, else my suffering would still be with me to that extreme degree. The only thing that worked was to avoid all of this and sleep in whatever mood I knew represented expansion to me, no matter the emotional current or charge. I fixated on the vision I had and I didn't care how I felt emotionally. I made progress for the first time in my life by throwing EVERYTHING LOA told me to do out the window and lived with common sense. We're told this isn't manifesting, and yet for years I suffered SO BADLY because I did what they said and it ONLY stopped when I said stuff this I'm doing things my way and I'll get what I want instead of trying to "convince" myself while living in heavy compromise having my doubts creep up every day non stop. I'd live to try and distract myself from the doubt and nothing worked it always showed up because the way we're taught this is MEANINGLESS.

Using my method works for all conditioning because it's functional to the root cause of all of our issues. Living in false expectations to be someone you're not is the core issue of all of us, placing importance on other peoples expectations and conditions for how we need to life, and people who tell you they don't have any still do, they just can't see it yet. That's what my coaching is for, to reveal the trash that we're blind to.

"The first letter, JOD in the name God is a hand or a seed, not just a hand, but the hand of the director. If there is one organ of man that discriminates and sets him apart from the entire world of creation it is his hand. What we call a hand in the anthropoid ape is not a hand. It is used only for the purpose of conveying food to the mouth, or to swing from branch to branch. Man’s hand fashions, it molds. You cannot really express yourself without the hand. This is the builder’s hand, the hand of the director; it directs, and molds, and builds within your world.

The ancient storytellers called the first letter JOD, the hand, or the absolute seed out of which the whole of creation will come." - five lessons 1948

So JOD is seed too.

I also just want to mention that since I've trained much less lately (despite nourishing myself the same in other ways) I can feel the qi stagnation and this undercurrent of frustration as a result. It seems to me that physically moving my body consistently over the day especially for bursts frequently, this is necessary to keep qi moving. I know exactly what all of these stagnation patterns feel like and how they manifest in my psychology, and I also immediately know the answer to the solution. It's crazy how insanely useful TCM is when you know all the details of how to apply it. It is also extremely hot here and I don't have the AC on like I'm dumb or something so it's no surprise.

"You are now the woman with the issue of blood. What is this issue of blood? A running womb is not a productive womb. She held it for 12 years, she was incapable of conceiving. She could not give form to her longing because of the running of the issue of blood. You are told her faith closed it. As the womb closes it can give form to the seed or idea.

As your mind is cleansed of your former concept of Self, you assume you are what you want to be, and remaining faithful to this assumption, you give form to your assumption or resurrect your child. You are the woman cleansed of the issue of blood, and you move towards the house of the dead child.

The child or state you desired is now your fixed concept of yourself. But now having assumed that I AM what formerly I desired to be, I cannot continue desiring what I AM conscious of being. So I do not discuss it. I talk to no one concerning what I AM. It is so obvious to me that I AM what I wanted to be that I walk as though I were." - same

This is interesting actually. Faith closes the running of blood. This isn't about a woman in the flesh here this is metaphysical. I've searched the lectures for this running of blood thing and nothing comes up so he didn't preach this message for long.

"When you do become cleansed and you are free, then the womb, your own mind is automatically healed. It becomes the prepared ground where seeds, your desires, can take root and grow into manifestation. The child you now bear in your heart is your present objective. Your present longing is a child that is as though it were sick. If you assume you are now what you would like to be, the child for a moment becomes dead because there is no disturbance anymore." - same

So cleansing the womb is cleansing the mind, is moving current, is all of the things we talk about in other parts here about mediating illuminating currents.

"As Spring is the time of the year when the millons of seeds, which all winter lay buried in the ground, suddenly spring into visibility that man might live and because the mystical drama of the crucifixion and resurrection is in the nature of this yearly change, it is celebrated at this Spring season of the year but actually it is taking place every moment of time. The being that is crucified is our awareness of being. The cross is your conception of yourself. The resurrection is the lifting into visibility of this conception of yourself. Far from being a day of mourning Good Friday should be a day of rejoicing, for there can be no resurrection without a crucifixion. The thing to be resurrected in your case is that which you desire to be. To do this, you must feel yourself to be the thing desired. You must feel I AM that, for I AM the resurrection and the life. Yes, I AM (Your awareness of being) is the power resurrecting and making alive that which you are aware of being." - I know my Father 1960

That's good stuff. What's crucified are our charges that are dysfunctional and bound to thematics that imply unavailability because of expectations.

"The drama of life originates in the imagination of man. The real act of becoming takes place within man’s imagination and not without. The following stories could define “causation” as the assemblage of mental states, which occurring, creates that which the assemblage implies." - the law and the promise 1961

Right so the assemblage of thematic components, the composition as I say, is the cause. The overall state of consciousness, which NG did say there are levels of remember.

"By him they were made; by him they continue in being; And by him they can cease to be. The secret of causation is in the assembled imagery, but a word of warning, the assemblage must have meaning; it must imply something or it will not form the creative activity, the world." - same

Wow listen to that. A WORD OF WARNING! It must imply something or it will not form the creative activity. That's what we've already established. The sensory representation "targets" the thematic currents that overlap in pathway cascades and the charge is "felt" into and thus you can then mediate pressure in meaningful ways to free expectations.

"There is no fiction. If an imaginal activity can produce a physical effect, our physical world must be essentially imaginal. To prove this would require merely that we observe our imaginal activities and watch to see whether or not they produce corresponding external effects. If they do, then we must conclude that there is no fiction. Today’s imaginal drama, fiction, becomes tomorrow’s fact. If we had this wider view of causation, that causation is mental, not physical, that our mental states are causative of physical effects, then we would realize our responsibility as a creator and imagine only the best imaginable. Fable enacted as a sort of stage-play in the mind is what causes the physical facts of life. Man believes that reality resides in the solid objects he sees around him, that it is in this world, that the drama of life originates, that events spring suddenly into existence, created moment by moment out of antecedent physical facts. But causation does not lie in the external world of facts." - same

It's all mental huh. Well the physical world is a manifestation of the intangible currents. From this level I can agree, mental images in themselves though cannot manifest the world without there being current behind them. So if he said above the causation of phenomena is the ASSAMBLAGE (composition and meaning) of of imagery, then the charge/reaction that's elicited in response is the ACTUAL cause since that's the moment of activation/fertilization of the state, or capacity. You could argue that the states, desire (from the pattern perspective of implication) and all that stuff is a capacity, that these images we have are capacities to create, thematically. These things can "push out" quite literally through us, and through others, thus manifestation. It's not magic it's charge and aetheric pressure gradient phenomena, charge in the meridian systems mediating thematic currents that process in supply/demand which draws and repels things to us like linking cycles within each other that operate as one process, and people who are involved in that will play the part thinking they're the ones thinking when they're not, just as we're not also since God provides the current for the desire to activate when we accept it. That's why "only God acts" and how "you don't lift a finger to make it happen" if you interpret it as God moving.

"Chapter Five
THE COIN OF HEAVEN

“Does a firm persuasion that a thing is so, make it so?”

And the prophet replied, “All poets believe that it does. And in ages of imagination, this firm persuasion removed mountains: but many are not capable of a firm persuasion of anything.”
Blake, Marriage of Heaven and Hell

Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind. Romans 14:5

PERSUASION IS an inner effort of intense attention.

To listen attentively as though you heard is to evoke, to activate." - awakened imagination 1954

I thought NG said that attention needs to be as effortless as possible. Contradiction? Well he's talking about intensity again too, as well as activation here. That's why I quoted it for more examples of this term we can interpret. I've literally quoted almost every example of all these terms here over the pages.

"The world of creation is finished and its original is within us. We saw it before we set forth, and have since been trying to remember it and to activate sections of it. There are infinite views of it. Our task is to get the right view and by determined direction of our attention make it pass in procession before the inner eye. If we assemble the right sequence and experience it in imagination until it has the tone of reality, then we consciously create circumstances.

This inner procession is the activity of imagination that must be consciously directed. We, by a series of mental transformations, become aware of increasing portions of that which already is, and by matching our own mental activity to that portion of creation which we desire to experience, we activate it, resurrect it, and give it life." - same

So assembling the "right sequence" and experiencing that is how "we consciously create circumstances", aka move currents. Portion of creation, thematic currents in composition, the assemblage.

"They are activated as soon as Human Imagination enters and fuses with them. Each represents certain mental and emotional activities. To enter a state, man must consent to the ideas and feelings which it represents." - same

So here he says that we must consent to the ideas that the image implies. Once again, if there's secondary conditions and such on top then those will need to die first. Your death is the death of the person who holds to the expectations of others, or whatever the condition is.

"These states represent an infinite number of possible mental transformations which man can experience. To move into another state or mansion necessitates a change of beliefs.

All that you could ever desire is already present and only waits to be matched by your beliefs.

But it must be matched, for that is the necessary condition by which alone it can be activated and objectified." - same

Same stuff again. States and mansions are the same.

"The conscious mind originates premises. The subjective mind unfolds them to their logical ends. Were the subjective mind not so limited in its initiative power of reasoning, objective man could not be held responsible for his actions in the world. Man transmits ideas to the subconscious through his feelings. The subconscious transmits ideas from mind to mind through telepathy. Your unexpressed convictions of others are transmitted to them without their conscious knowledge or consent, and if subconsciously accepted by them will influence their behavior." - prayer the art of believing 1945

So the transmission of ideas to the subconscious through feeling isn't actually the transmission of ideas, but that the ideas take upon themselves significance through charge. Here we also have this telepathy ideas too, thought transmission.

"Whenever you become completely absorbed in an emotional state, you are at that moment assuming the feeling of the state fulfilled. If persisted in, whatsoever you are intensely emotional about, you will experience in your world.

These periods of absorption, of concentrated attention, are the beginnings of the things you harvest.

It is in such moments that you are exercising your creative power – the only creative power there is. At the end of these periods, or moments of absorption, you speed from these imaginative states (where you have not been physically) to where you were physically an instant ago. In these periods, the imagined state is so real that, when you return to the objective world and find that it is not the same as the imagined state, it is an actual shock. You have seen something in imagination with such vividness that you now wonder whether the evidence of your senses can now be believed, and, like Keats, you ask," - the power of awareness 1952

The shock. I've experienced this and it makes no difference. The examples of NG telling us about reactions to things in the world manifest the same outcomes he says so this isn't necessary.

"The windows of heaven may not be opened and the treasures seized by a strong will, but they open of themselves and present their treasures as a free gift – a gift that comes when absorption reaches such a degree that it results in a feeling of complete acceptance." - same

Absorption. Acceptance. Acceptance of more of self.

"I first discovered this close relationship of moods to vision when I was aged about seven. I became aware of a mysterious life quickening within me like a stormy ocean of frightening might. I always knew when I would be united with this hidden identity, for my senses were expectant on the nights of these visitations and I knew beyond all doubt that before morning I would be alone with immensity. I so dreaded these visitations that I would lie awake until my eyes from sheer exhaustion closed. As my eyes closed in sleep, I was no longer solitary but smitten through and through with another being, and yet I knew it to be myself. It seemed older than life, yet nearer to me than my boyhood. If I tell what I discovered on these nights, I do so not to impose my ideas on others but that I may give hope to those who seek the law of life.

I discovered that my expectant mood worked as a magnet to unite me with this Greater Me, while my fears made It appear as a stormy sea. As a boy, I conceived of this mysterious self as might, and in my union with It I felt its majesty as a stormy sea which drenched me, then rolled and tossed me as a helpless wave." - the search 1946

This right here is VERY important. So when he's talking about uniting with the greater self he's talking about the illumination of God here that's purifying. As I explained before it's only God that can change us, since we have no way of moving our center in ourselves, which the alchemist has said endlessly. Much of the power of these methods comes from accepting innate self which taps us closer to God. When NG talked about his past experiences here it's an indication that he's working theurgy processes to some degree without knowing it, meaning he was very ripe even early on.

"Your assumption is the hand of God moulding the firmament into the image of that which you assume.

The assumption of the wish fulfilled is the high tide which lifts you easily off the bar of the senses where you have so long lain stranded.

It lifts the mind into prophecy in the full right sense of the word; and if you have that controlled imagination and absorbed attention which it is possible to attain, you may be sure that all your assumption implies will come to pass." - the power of awareness 1945

Right there is another indication of these things I just mentioned.

Thematically speaking, yeah. I can agree. If we look at our lives we will know this.

"One afternoon, a young grandmother, a businesswoman in New York, came to see me. She brought along her nine-year-old grandson, who was visiting her from his home in Pennsylvania. In response to her questions, I explained the law of assumption, describing in detail the procedure to be followed in attaining an objective. The boy sat quietly, apparently absorbed in a small toy truck, while I explained to the grandmother the method of assuming the state of consciousness that would be hers were her desire already fulfilled.

I told her the story of the soldier in camp, who, each night, fell asleep, imagining himself to be in his own bed in his own home.

When the boy and his grandmother were leaving, he looked up at me with great excitement and said, "I know what I want and, now, I know how to get it". Surprised, I asked him what it was he wanted; he told me he had his heart set on a puppy.

To this, the grandmother vigorously protested, telling the boy that it had been made clear repeatedly that he could not have a dog under any circumstances... that his father and mother would not allow it, that the boy was too young to care for it properly, and furthermore, the father had a deep dislike for dogs – he actually hated to have one around.

All these were arguments the boy, passionately desirous of having a dog, refused to understand. "Now I know what to do", he said. "Every night, just as I am going off to sleep, I am going to pretend that I have a dog and we are going for a walk". "No", said the grandmother, "that is not what Mr. Neville means. This was not meant for you. You cannot have a dog".

Approximately six weeks later, the grandmother told me what was to her an astonishing story. The boy's desire to own a dog was so intense that he had absorbed all that I had told his grandmother of how to attain one's desire – and he believed implicitly that at last he knew how to get a dog.

Putting this belief into practice, for many nights, the boy imagined a dog was lying in his bed beside him. In imagination, he petted the dog, actually feeling its fur. Things like playing with the dog and taking it for a walk filled his mind.

Within a few weeks, it happened. A newspaper in the city in which the boy lived organized a special program in connection with Kindness to Animals Week. All schoolchildren were requested to write an essay on "Why I Would Like to Own a Dog".

After entries from all the schools were submitted and judged, the winner of the contest was announced. The very same boy who weeks before in my apartment in New York had told me "Now I know how to get a dog" was the winner. In an elaborate ceremony, which was publicized with stories and pictures in the newspaper, the boy was awarded a beautiful collie puppy.

In relating this story, the grandmother told me that if the boy had been given the money with which to buy a dog, the parents would have refused to do so and would have used it to buy a bond for the boy or put it in the savings bank for him. Furthermore, if someone had made the boy a gift of a dog, they would have refused it or given it away.

But the dramatic manner in which they boy got the dog, the way he won the city-wide contest, the stories and pictures in the newspaper, the pride of achievement and joy of the boy himself all combined to bring about a change of heart in the parents, and they found themselves doing that which they never conceived possible – they allowed him to keep the dog.

All this the grandmother explained to me, and she concluded by saying that there was one particular kind of dog on which the boy had set his heart. It was a collie." - same

Interesting. I can say that this would be a legit story and makes sense. He went all the way, that's what mattered.

"The one requisite is to arouse your attention in a way and to such intensity that you become wholly absorbed in the revised action. You will experience an expansion and refinement of the senses by this imaginative exercise and eventually achieve vision.

But always remember that the ultimate purpose of this exercise is to create in you “the Spirit of Jesus”, which is continual forgiveness of sin.

Revision is of greatest importance when the motive is to change oneself, when there is a sincere desire to be something different, when the longing is to awaken the ideal active spirit of forgiveness." - awakened imagination 1954

So intensity here is depths of imagining, which is the depths of feeling God, thus expansion.

"This quality of denial, when disciplined, protects man from receiving impressions that are not in harmony with his nature. He adopts an attitude of total indifference to all suggestions that are foreign to that which he desires to express. Disciplined denial is not a fight or a struggle but total indifference." - your faith if your fortune 1941

Well right there. Denial is indifference. Denial isn't delusion but a lack of charge, thus functional detachment since there's no expectation that holds importance to trigger reaction, managing you can hold to the faith and be indifferent. You fixate on the vision.

"As long as you remain in your present conscious state so long will you continue desiring that which you now desire. Change your conception of yourself and you will automatically change the nature of your desires.

Desires are states of consciousness seeking embodiment. They are formed by man’s consciousness and can easily be expressed by the man who has conceived them. Desires are expressed when the man who has conceived them assumes the attitude of mind that would be his if the states desired were already expressed. Now because desires regardless of their nature can be so easily expressed by fixed attitudes of mind, a word of warning must be given to those who have not yet realized the oneness of life, and who do not know the fundamental truth that consciousness is God, the one and only reality. This warning was given to man in the famous Golden Rule, “Do unto others that which you would have them do unto you.” You may desire something for yourself or you may desire for another. If your desire concerns another make sure that the thing desired is acceptable to that other. The reason for this warning is that your consciousness is God, the giver of all gifts. Therefore, that which you feel and believe to be true of another is a gift you have given him. The gift that is not accepted returns to the giver. Be very sure then that you would love to possess the gift yourself, for if you fix a belief within yourself, as true of another, and he does not accept this state as true of himself, this unaccepted gift will embody itself within your world. Always hear and accept as true of others that which you would desire for yourself. In so doing you are building heaven on earth. “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” is based upon this law.

Only accept such states as true of others that you would willingly accept as true of yourself that you may constantly create heaven on earth. Your heaven is defined by the state of consciousness in which you live, which state is made up of all that you accept as true of yourself and true of others. Your immediate environment is defined by your own conception of yourself plus your convictions regarding others which have not been accepted by them." - freedom for all 1942

You change the nature of your desire because you've accepted that there's no condition in the way of it and are in supply, hence the attachment is the pressure of the desire to expand. Here when he talks about the golden rule too, he mentions in other lectures about the boomerang effect where if someone rejects negative things then you'll get it back to you. He mentioned this even in post promise lectures too.

"The story of the Passover is to help you turn your back on the limitations of the present and pass over into a better and freer state. The suggestion to “Follow the man with the pitcher of water” was given to the disciples to guide them to the last supper or the feast of the Passover. The man with the pitcher of water is the eleventh disciple, Simon of Canaan, the disciplined quality of mind which hears only dignified, noble and kindly states. The mind that is disciplined to hear only the good, feasts upon good states, and so embodies the good on earth. If you, too, would attend the last supper . . the great feast of the Passover . . then follow this man. Assume this attitude of mind symbolized as the “man with the pitcher of water” and you will live in a world that is really heaven on earth. The feast of the Passover is the secret of changing your consciousness. You turn your attention from your present conception of yourself and assume the consciousness of being that which you want to be, thereby passing from one state to another. This feat is accomplished with the help of the twelve disciples, which are the twelve disciplined qualities of mind*" - same

Sounds pretty useless to me. I get the principle but that's not how this works in application.

"No simpler method was ever recorded of consciousness impregnating itself than is found in the story of the Immaculate Conception. The four characters in this drama of creation are the Father, the Son, Mary and the Angel. The Father symbolizes your consciousness; the Son symbolizes your desire; Mary symbolizes your receptive attitude of mind; and the Angel symbolizes the method used to make the impregnation. The drama unfolds in this manner. The Father begets a Son without the aid of another. You define your objective.. you clarify your desire without the help or suggestion of another." - same

Mary represents yin, as I've said.

I'll let you interpret that. It's just putting together parts we've already been over.

More on angels in scripture and application of this idea. It's that someone you hear a voice of (or see I'd assume using other senses) is what this is about. Remember that if we are impregnated as NG says then it means our attitude changes, meaning our charge has been dropped in terms of the importance of the expectations and conditions. This means that hyping yourself up and feeling like it's really real and then going back to react the same way means nothing changed. You never actually changed state, you never dropped the seed, you never actually implied fulfilment which would mean that conditional overlaps would ne dropped for you to drop desire. The desire is pressure for expansion, as gifts from God. Therefore, imagining something without changing the underlying current is wasting your time and has nothing to do with what's being taught.

"As you feel, so do you impress her; and she, the perfect lover, gives form to these impressions and out pictures them as the children of her beloved. “Thou art all fair, my love; there is no spot in thee,” is the attitude of mind to adopt before dropping off to sleep. Disregard appearances and feel that things are as you wish them to be, for He calleth things that are not seen as though they were, and the unseen becomes seen. To assume the feeling of satisfaction is to call conditions into being which will mirror satisfaction. Signs follow, they do not precede. Proof that you are will follow the consciousness that you are; it will not precede it." - feeling is the secret 1944

Yeah I can understand this if you apply is correctly. When you sleep in the state of expectations being irrelevant to you then you'll have impacts that are positive' I've done this over and over and it works to improve circumstances.

"Prayer is the art of assuming the feeling of being and having that which you want. When the senses confirm the absence of your wish, all conscious effort to counteract this suggestion is futile and tends to intensify the suggestion.

Prayer is the art of yielding to the wish and not the forcing of the wish. Whenever your feeling is in conflict with your wish, feeling will be the victor. The dominant feeling invariably expresses itself. Prayer must be without effort. In attempting to fix an attitude of mind which is denied by the senses, effort is fatal.

To yield successfully to the wish as an accomplished fact, you must create a passive state, a kind of reverie or meditative reflection similar to the feeling which precedes sleep. In such a relaxed state, the mind is turned from the objective world and easily senses the reality of a subjective state. It is a state in which you are conscious and quite able to move or open your eyes but have no desire to do so." - same

This is a bombshell

Right there he's telling us that "flipping thoughts" as it's said is useless. I've mostly said that too, though if you know how to cut through conditions on the spot with dynamic advanced pathway work, then you CAN apply this. You kill the implication on the spot by making radical actions that imply the disempowered nature of the expectation and this will transform your life. I have various clients that will confirm this. He literally says that flipping thoughts intensifies the suggestion of the senses, which I can agree with, though I will argue that there are in fact ways of approaching it that will work if you've done enough pathway work to understand meaning and then how to apply that to go all the way when opportunities to cut through the trash arise. That is working THE SAME mechanism as entering into the state of the wish fulfilled. It's arguably a more direct way of doing it actually and I will say that many radical changes in peoples lives came from this, a moment of courage for inner truth. People who watched my video on that thought I was probably a whacko who never read NG and yet here we are. What ignorant trash. We KNOW how this works, and here's NG telling all the girl boss ignorant fools who make millions off LOA coaching that their "thought flipping" is useless and will make it worse. Yeah it will, because it made my life worse, just as it does to pretty much everyone who tries this. It's something that absolutely ruined my life beyond measure.

"On the other hand, the undisciplined man finds it difficult to believe that which is denied by the senses and usually accepts or rejects solely on appearances of the senses. Because of this tendency to rely on the evidence of the senses, it is necessary to shut them out before starting to pray, before attempting to feel that which they deny. Whenever you are in the state of mind “I should like to, but I cannot”, the harder you try, the less you are able to yield to the wish. You never attract that which you want, but always attract that which you are conscious of being." - same

This is correct actually. The feelings you have underlying the sensory details will always dominate. This is the expectation being made conscious. When the expectation is conscious you'll be stuck in the box and only keep looping the meaning of that until you cut through it all the way. https://realitysynthesis.com/pages/aetheraeon-notebook-32

Item added to your cart

Aetheraeon Notebook 31

Aetheraeon Notebook 31

Country/region