Aetheraeon Notebook 45

Newton had the Prima Materia at the top, which the alchemist says represents particles of generative starlight, KIND OF like bions, and this becomes the various "humors" as Newton called them which are the qualities of the elements to categories them, and then you have the planets or elements, the 4 elements and the 3 principles. It goes Prima Materia, then The cosmic salt and niter representing fixed and volatile elements, then they branch into earth and water, then into air and fire. Earth and water overlap with salt, since salt is material bodily form, then water and air would be mercury, spirit, the least dense and the most difficult to capture, and then sulphur which is overlapping fire and air. Sulphur contains mercury and salt within, which is why in lab alchemy you can extract the plant salts from a sulphur and reuse them in another batch if you want to just synthesize sulphur from ethanol and the plant salts. The whole "work of Saturn" as it's called is the case of transforming the dense lead into the solar gold. We automatically assume this must be an accurate interpretation of reality and so we try and try and try to find patterns in this, but we all fail.

The thing we can take from this above all else is the very substantive view of reality itself. Remember Newton saw reality as made of "corpuscles" which was a very common term used all the way up until Bohr came up with the atom as we know it now and the term particles became normal. They used particles before at times but it became academically normal after Bohr was institutionalized. I just can't shake the feeling that these physicists were stupid because of how they described the double slit experiment. It was Bohr I believe who thought that the electron particles "bounced off the edges of the slits" to form the wave patterns he saw. LIKE WHAT? ARE YOU STUPID? I was blown away by how dumb that was. It's not even close to what's observed. If they were rebounding off the edge of the slits and bouncing around they'd not form interference patterns. I've done experiments myself using lasers and I've seen the waves too. What blows my mind is that these people who are propped up as science heroes thought that this is how you explain the double slit result. HOW? One stone thought it was similar too.

I just don't get it. How could these super smart guys assume that this is the real explanation?

Anyway, Newton believed in the idea that I'm trying to promote here. He wrote about this in his work on opticks from 1718. He thought that the salts of the chemicals he was working with were absorbing moisture from the air, AKA osmosis, but in an alchemical sense. When we think about it, osmosis is a physics principle that is how water moves in and out of cells in the body. The gradients of salt and water determine this. It's a very real manifestation of alchemy, but a very very basic one at that, and there'd be many many many other "layers" of manifestation of this.

I've also just been made aware that there was supposedly another 911 attempt that just happened from some wild Arab thinking that crashing planes into Israel. This is just more manufactured trash. You know the news reporter said that there was a 23 year old woman on that plane who had a brother that died in the October 7th attacks in 2023, the COMPLETELY MANUFACTURED ATTACK, at least according to the footage which shows tiling artifacts not from any known codec. The assumption was that many of the videos were manufactured, so it's either there was no attack and that it was all fake, or that there was one and it was staged and then footage was doctored ahead of time. I've seen all this like 2 years ago. It's no surprise. But her brother dying on the attacks that supposedly happened 3 years ago OUT OF ALMOST 10 MILLIONS people from Israel who could've been on that flight, that's just very difficult to buy. The chances here are wild. I think it was spun this way to elicit reactions from people. The attack probably happened, but as usual it'll be spun because that's WHY these things happen. It's very unlikely that this woman had a brother die since there was only a few hundred dead. It's crazy because the death toll claimed on that day is just like the number from the holocaust, it keeps being revised over and over and over. We don't see this happening with other shootings, the number is set and known and published. Israel keeps inflating it up as the years pass on. Wonder why. It only indicates it's not as they say it is, which I believe at least part of it was manufactured and completely made up, AT LEAST PART, but again KNOWING that is very difficult. It's pretty obvious that the footage was doctored though, or just AI generated or something, especially since the footage has known AI artiefcts of objects vanishing out of thin air and whatnot.

So to me this isn't a shock, we know that war between the behemoth (Islam) and leviathan (white west) must happen really soon. This is being timed right in line with the economic crack on the way too. Jensen is having trouble keeping the AI train going, and he's been making up data for ages now and people are seeing through it, so it's just the big circular financing that's keeping this going. RTX 5090 cost almost 10k USD now. I've removed one from my workstation since I really think selling it will be the best way to go since I rarely use local AI anyway and dual 5090 aren't useful for anything else. I'll make so much profit.

Back to physics. Newton thought that there was real elements that exist and that the corpuscles on a smaller scale had higher virtue, which is how close it is to the divine.

"The smallest Particles of Matter may cohere by the strongest Attractions, and compose bigger Particles of weaker Virtue; and many of these may cohere and compose bigger Particles whose Virtue is still weaker..."

Virtue here are following the principles laid out before, how the elements overlap and have various qualities and how close they are to Prima Materia directly vs manifest objects. He actually proposes a model of alchemical integration, where the attraction force being strongest is from these elements being isolated vs being a sort of overlapping composite of multiple elements together.

Actually it seems to me that Newton saw reality more from an atomist view, more than a Greek view like Aristotelianism.

Aristotelianism is what we're actually exploring here more or less, in a sense ancient Greek physics taken into the modern world. This is similar to what Kehlan was proposing in fact, but still not actually his model because the Aristotelian view proposed an Aether which he wasn't really directly supporting. I say there's an aether and that it never was disproven. It was only ONE model of the aether that was disproven, that's it. There's MANY different models of the aether, like the one Maxwell worked with or the one that Tesla worked with, which were different models and made different predictions of the experiment. So NO the aether WAS NOT "disproven", that's false info from Jew owned media that NEEDED the aether to be wrong and so likely used the Michelson Morley experiment as the PERFECT OPPORTUNITY to transition into the modern atomist view. Keep in mind, again, almost everyone who was prominent at the time was critical of the experiment's results. They didn't just abandon the aether, because guys like Lorentz worked on his own transforms for the aetheric model to explain what Einstein did. He's the one who created the "Lorentz force" as it's known and things like length contraction equations which are actually still used now, despite being modelled for an aetheric substrate.

Aristotelianism is the focus of this study. We are adapting ancient Greek views of physics into the modern world. I tried to find a model that Newton had but he barely had anything and it was very very primitive. We will have to develop this all ourselves. There's nobody out there that I can find who's doing this work it seems. I've found some whackos who think that reality is made of primitive objects but not fundamental alchemical elements themselves.

The Lorentz transforms must describe a real physical process occurring here. This is what his work was modelling effectively, a real aether that shifted and stretched like a fluidic elastic medium. This is what Maxwell worked with.

The way the Greeks seemed to view consciousness as it's called is that it contains all these pre-determined forms as capacities for experience. I mean that's basically what the whole microcosm thing is, where everything out here is what's correspondent to what's in here, but they didn't see that as just breaking down phenomena into categories. Having "more consciousness" in THAT sense seems to be related to having more elements to perceive, not just "wider" awareness. The thing is that in a practical sense really doesn't work unless we can demonstrate all these forms so fundamentally underlie all physics. That's still not proven and my attempts to put this together so far have run into walls. You can describe some but you need a systematic view on things. Like fundamental forces need to be established since these variables are the most common in mathematical descriptions that map them. Yang would obviously be radiant movement and energy manifestation where yin would be the opposite.

I just was made aware once again that the protein that the mRNA injections manufacture still persist in the body of most people who took it to significantly elevated levels. There's no enzyme in the body that can break it down, so it'll be there for life in most people. If you got that injection you've been targeted. 2/3 of the world has this in them, not me though of course. I'm not a fool who bought into that. It's funny because I remember having a dream where I was forcibly injected and felt like I was dying and woke up from the dream immediately. Isn't that an interesting thread too, that intensity in dreams occurs like right as you wake up from them. This is the same thing as NDEs with the intensity of the experience. Fools want to buy into this over and over that there's some spiritual dimension or body but there's really no data that supports this at all. It's all an assumption that's manufactured. It was a Greek thought but there's no real data which indicates this is a thing.

Greek thought of "the soul" as we know it likely wasn't even what the modern conception is. I'm honestly starting to believe that this entire idea of a spiritual body as is claimed, like a ghost in a body, wasn't even what the concept of the soul really was back then. I need to read more and find quotes from the Platonists and the likes. I've not read Greek source material since 2020 so I'm totally out of it. Ken use to hype up Plotinus as the most intelligent philosopher ever and now that I've got WAY more experience with this I can likely read through his work far more accurately instead of making false assumptions about what he means. I've totally killed off any notion of a psycho-spiritual reality model that's indicating multiple bodies and levels and evolution and whatnot of the "consciousness". That's so dumb.

Here's an interesting one. There's a documentary on conjoined twins about how they share sensory stimulus between each other, where they both share parts of the brain in their individual consciousness. What's this? If the soul is one per body then how can this work? Conjoined twins with shared brain structures like the thalamus which is responsible for sensory mediation will share sensory stimulus. So does this mean that if one imagines then the other does too? Well I think this is a very good case to explain manifesting mechanics and disprove NG LOA definitively because their reality would cross constantly with how they experience in a psycho-spiritual doctrine.

If you want some serious questions on "the soul" then go study conjoined twins, where they each have individual brains but in SOME of the cases the motor wiring can cross and even their visual awareness can cross too. This means that the manifest experience would be shared, despite having totally different "I AM" behind the eyes. How does this work? Nothing about this is explained, which is why I've been doubting the bible as a manifesting manual for a while now because it simply can't explain this stuff. I have fools send me DMs asking me about how I see scripture as a manifesting manual and I tell them I can't see how that works knowing what I understand about manifesting and I get met with hostility. They don't want to understand, they just want confirmation and biases affirmed. That's what almost everyone is like in this space. That's why I'm the only one doing this work.

Oooo look at that. There's cases of conjoined twins where they can read each others thoughts, which means their imagination are shared. Is it ONE person or two? They manifest as two but they're in one body, despite seemingly having unique personalities. It's wild stuff. Yeah there's one case where they're called the Krista Tatiana twins literally are known to share thoughts. They have one brain but individual personalities. Their imaginations are shared. If one wants something the other will act as though they're the same person, but still be individual in terms of personality and attitude. So does this mean the I AM behind them as it's called is distinct or shared or separate? Who knows. This is the kind of stuff that nobody can answer.

I just want to once again say I'm doubtful of this idea that reality is constructed of fundamental elemental parts that are the microcosm of God that you are a receptive vessel for and can interact and experience them all. That's unable to explain all phenomena clearly, like how physics works, given what's known at this point at least.

The third man phenomena, as in when someone manifests in your world as a real projection of someone, much like what I've experienced, it's coming from being sick. You are SICK, and the body is projecting this figure to interpret your subjective experience and the other intelligence in your brain, the split brain phenomena, will talk back to you like it's another intelligence. This is what happens when you do extensive gazing and drift into these other worlds and whatnot. Your brain is literally overlapping regions that it's not built to do by default, and after doing this for years it's become clear how I've been so easily impacted by this and WHY when I'm in VERY INTENSE states that I most often have these things manifest. This is all explainable in TCM. TCM is the main reason I came to understand this, because these visions are pathogenic in TCM. It's a sign of overlapping states beyond their bounds. So the alchemist preaches pathogenic methods to induce effectively interconnection in the brain that's out of normal range to stimulate regions that will induce visions, and then market it as psycho-spiritual effects and proof of alchemical expansion. NO YOU IDIOT it's SICKNESS. This is what NG did with Abdullah and what all this "mental science" stuff is about, which I've always trashed from the start since I already knew that didn't work.

I'm literally the first person as far as I'm aware to have put all this together, and then to connect this to the psychology realm and the psycho-spiritual movement that followed it which we're now living in the effects of today. Who else has figured out the deeper mechanics of this, and that manifesting can be almost entirely explained via role dynamics through a physical neuroendocrine level? It's INSANE that I've literally decoded NG LOA so completely that we've even disproven scripture as a political playbook and that the soul doesn't really exist as an entity and the I AM is just a philosophical idea to explain somatosensory experience.

The idea therefore that reality is built out of fundamental forms, if we follow the trend, is very unlikely. If everything else so far has fallen from its grace then this is most likely the same way, and attempting to prove it to be truly empirical will be a serious challenge even for me. Nobody thus far as far as I know has correctly explained manifest reality through this Aristotelian model. Everybody JUST ASSUMES that these people were somehow more intelligent and smarter than us, and they look back at these people as having the ultimate truth JUST BECAUSE they know something is wrong with modern science. Yeah there is deep deep issues with modern sciences but that doesn't make ancient Greek philosophy the only answer. I've always tried to be as objective as I can, especially in the last year or so, especially, which was when I started seeing cracks in the psycho-spiritual reality doctrines from doing deeper TCM study and observing how I experienced manifesting and how gazing impacted me and the trends with what made it more intense or not. This has really been the thing which has allowed me to see all of this, and my distance from the NG LOA space and really any space out there or any people in specific that I'd follow or study has allowed me to simply do my own work and develop my own view.

This is why RS in my eyes stands above the rest, because it's got basis in all these systems and coherently places them where they really are, how they apply and what their limits are.

I still can't shake the fact that many of these psycho-spiritual doctrines were manufactured by Jews, at least since scripture was written out. It's just insane to think that this is what's come to the surface as the facts. I will argue all of this with mountains of data that I've gathered. There's really no debate at this point as far as I'm aware. I've seen more than enough to conclude that this reality is physical and nothing more. That's not a bad thing, but for some it is, because it strips out this fantasy of there being all these worlds to explore in other lives and whatnot. It's how they feel that's important, not what is, and all this subjective belief stuff to attempt to dodge that is just cope. I don't buy that for one second.

We know that the Jew wants to exterminate us all so that's clearly indicating a very real physical threat.

This indicates to me that eugenic reproduction really is the goal of life, as I said before.

I thought I had it all figured out some years back with all my alchemical understanding and my experiences with this stuff and my physics studies on the aether and my models of biology with the bions and such, it's all very unique stuff but RS in the early days wasn't THE TRUTH, per say. It was a VERY coherent model within the psycho-spiritual framework, but outside that, you could still poke holes in it which I've done, and now here we are.

Item added to your cart

Aetheraeon Notebook 45

Aetheraeon Notebook 44

Country/region